| Revision as of 20:13, 22 December 2007 editJ Milburn (talk | contribs)Administrators129,890 edits →Igneuspentheism: Close debate; result was speedy delete← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:18, 21 July 2022 edit undoQwerfjkl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Rollbackers212,880 editsm Fixed missing '#' in colour hex codes per AWB request | ||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| :{{la|Igneuspentheism}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Igneuspentheism}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| My second ] nomination for today. '''Delete'''. Blanchardb-<small><sup>]]]</sup></small>-timed 19:22, 22 December 2007 (UTC) | My second ] nomination for today. '''Delete'''. Blanchardb-<small><sup>]]]</sup></small>-timed 19:22, 22 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Non-notable, no references, unencyclopedic, man I wish they had a speedy category for this kind of stuff... ] (]) 19:33, 22 December 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Non-notable, no references, unencyclopedic, man I wish they had a speedy category for this kind of stuff... ] (]) 19:33, 22 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' I think db-group might apply. Regardless, no notability. ] (]) 19:37, 22 December 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' I think db-group might apply. Regardless, no notability. ] (]) 19:37, 22 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| *'''Speedy delete''' I was thinking db-web but db-group could work as well; this article is clearly not notable. ] (]) 20:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC) | *'''Speedy delete''' I was thinking db-web but db-group could work as well; this article is clearly not notable. ] (]) 20:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:18, 21 July 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete by me, for obvious reasons. J Milburn (talk) 20:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Igneuspentheism
- Igneuspentheism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
My second made-up religion nomination for today. Delete. Blanchardb--timed 19:22, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable, no references, unencyclopedic, man I wish they had a speedy category for this kind of stuff... Icestorm815 (talk) 19:33, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I think db-group might apply. Regardless, no notability. Pharmboy (talk) 19:37, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Little or no value--NAHID 20:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete I was thinking db-web but db-group could work as well; this article is clearly not notable. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.