Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jtrainor: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:24, 25 December 2007 editTenOfAllTrades (talk | contribs)Administrators21,283 edits →Stalking: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:07, 19 November 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,135,113 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery 
(268 intermediate revisions by 97 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{nobots}}

'''Welcome!''' '''Welcome!'''


The Rules The Rules


#Be cool to me and I'll be cool to you #Be cool to me and I'll be cool to you. If you show up here and act like a jerk expect to have your posts removed.
#No anon IPs #No anon IPs. Log in if you want to talk to me.
#No puppets #No puppets. Self-explanatory.
#No Homers #No Homers
#Don't randomly template me instead of attempting to actually talk to me. This is 'shit and run' and will get you nowhere. Especially don't template me about being close to 3RR-- I am quite capable of counting to three and assuming that I can't will most definitely be taken as a personal attack.
#Catch-all prove 'em wrong clause: #Catch-all prove 'em wrong clause:
::5a) Yes it is ::5a) Yes it is
Line 13: Line 16:
::5d) No ::5d) No


==EBaum's== ==Deaf Culture==
Hi! Just wanted to explain quickly why I removed the Disability template from the ] page you added. It's been an on and off debate whether the page should have it, but an informal ] came to the conclusion that it should stay off the page. The basic reason came down to that though the physical inabilty to hear can be considered a disability (though some would say otherwise; a debate for another time, I'm sure) Deaf Culture is more about the culture that revolves around the Deaf Community. I'd be more than happy to elaborate a bit on this topic if you'd like. ] (]) 18:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Look. I have stairs in my house, so I know just how much of an annoying thief Bauman's is. And I support the fact that the article was protected (heh) in its current state. Don't vandalize it. And don't claim he steals everything from SA; he steals from ''everywhere''. ] 12:22, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
:I disagree, but I don't really have the time or energy to start a fight over this. ] (]) 20:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


==Your last two AfD nominations==
::I meant he steals everythinhg from everywhere. :p I don't want to vandalize it, I just want his crimes described on the page. ] 14:10, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
==Image copyright problem with Image:Emot-clownballoon.gif==
Thanks for uploading ]. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The ] is very careful about the images included in ] because of ] (see Misplaced Pages's ]).


Please read ] before considering nominating articles for deletion. In short, an unreferenced article won't be deleted on notability grounds if the sources can be found easily via a search. I find it generally saves everyone's time if I do a quick search for sources before considering nominating, with Google Books and their news archives being most useful. --] (])
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Misplaced Pages is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Misplaced Pages are ], ], and ]. Find the appropriate template in ] and place it on the image page like this: <code><nowiki>{{TemplateName}}</nowiki></code>.


== Mangum or Magnum ==
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from ].


Please double-check the spelling. —&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 00:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
:Go ahead and trash it, I only used it once for a humourous reply on a discussion page. I expected the auto-purge to prune it long ago.


== Yayyy! == == Re: DIREKTOR at WP:AE ==


Would you mind explaining how exactly my request is "clearly frivolous"? --] (]) 12:38, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Someone else who removes paginal.nl SPAMs! ] 06:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
:You're complaining because someone made three reverts in -11 days-. ] (]) 01:46, 26 September 2012 (UTC)


:I do what I can :) ] 22:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


== Response ==


==Arb==
Look, if you want to be part of the solution rather than part of the problem, see the discussion at ]. Otherwise keep your trolling off my talk page, please. Unhelpful posts like that are neither needed nor wanted: you have clearly failed to ] on a massive scale. Moreover, if you dislike Misplaced Pages so much, why are you still here? ] <sup> ]</sup> 16:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
:Disagreeing with you does not make me a troll. ] 18:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
* ];
* ].


Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> ] (]) 17:35, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
::What? Sorry? I only encountered these Gundam articles about a week ago. Not me. Moreover, your failure to assume good faith is so obvious that it does constitute trolling. I have no vendetta against Gundam. However, these articles fail ], ], ], and ] on a gigantic scale and very few of them actually assert notability, which is actually a '']'' deletion criterion. They are clear candidates for deletion. I would appreciate it if you began to assume good faith when there is every reason to do so. ] <sup> ]</sup> 14:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)


== Starnbar ==
:::I fail to assume good faith because no good faith exists on your part. Instead of nominating just the RX-78 Gundam article for deletion as claimed in the AFD vote, you nominated every mobile suit article you could find, in an apparent attempt to flush as much as possible before anyone else noticed.


{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
Furthermore, I will definitely not assume any good faith on your part when you call people who disagree with you trolls. ] 21:42, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]|]}}

|rowspan="2" |
== What happens when you go looking for votestacking support on external websites ==
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''

Which you did, at Mechatalk, is that someone takes it upon themselves to vandalize my userpage and user talk, and a lot of admins have to waste a lot of time doing blocks. Next time, think before you characterise Misplaced Pages editors as "going nuts", as the consequences may not be altogether pretty. Everyone has had to waste a lot of time. If you do know the fellow that is doing this, would you mind telling him to call off the socks? Thank you. Cheers, ] <sup> ]</sup> 16:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

:I mean, pictures of lynching? Yuck. Please help stop this if you can. ] <sup> ]</sup> 16:50, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

::I have no responsibility for anyone who decides to vandalize your userpage and certainly do not endorse such activity. The intent of my posts on other forums was to rally support for an issue I am concerned with.

Fair enough. I'll see what I can do with mechatalk. Cheers, ] <sup> ]</sup> 19:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, there is a way. Admins can view the histories and the deleted articles and restore them for you in your userspace, or maybe a subpage of ]. Contact one of the admins who closed the AfDs, say what articles you want back in your userspace to work on, and I'm sure they'll help out. Damn it, hopefully in less than a week I'll be able to do that for you. Incidentally, the reason why the histories aren't available to non-admins is that otherwise it would be too easy to undo the deletion by simply reverting. Cheers, ] <sup> ]</sup> 08:33, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

== That article ==

Eh, I think you've done it OK, but if there's a problem I'll fix it. I just left my delete vote with extensive reasoning...grr, that article makes me sick. Some of us actually bother to source our stuff to RS, and then we get people doing this? Great. Anyway, thanks for the heads up. As a future tip, deletion nominations normally should be longer, but I think I've covered the important points. Cheers, ] <sup> ]</sup> 19:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

:Alright, fixed now. Cheers, ] <sup> ]</sup> 19:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

== Thinking big ==

Agreed. I sincerely doubt that every single episode of The Simpsons passes the central notability criterion at ], or indeed any other notability criterion for that matter. How many of these episodes meet ""A topic is notable if it has been the subject of at least one substantial or multiple, non-trivial published works from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject and of each other."? Not many, I would guess. As regards the technical aspects of mass nominations, ] will tell you what to do.

However, it's probably best to take a more cautious approach than to mass-nominate a whole load of junk at once. Men are weak and tend to get frightened at mass AfD nominations. My own strategy for this would be first to alert the community - either at ] or at ] to the problem, and see whether rough consensus exists to deal with it. If there is rough consensus, then I would first nominate just one article to set a precedent. Perhaps ]? But mass-nominations are rarely successful - the only one that I can remember of the top of my head for a double-digit number of articles was one for a whole load of TV/radio masts that really did have no other claim to fame bar existing.

Hope this is helpful. At any rate, talking to the community before a mass AfD is definitely a good idea. Good luck! Cheers, ] <sup> ]</sup> 22:41, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

== Community noticeboard ==

It's back now, an excess of enthusiasm on the part of one admin who is doing sterling work in pruning the project of unnecessary instructions and processes, don't be too hard on him. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 16:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

== Lightsaber AfD ==

I saw you post there again... I would still like to know your answer on the afd to my concern I raised there in my last reply, if possible... thank you. - ] 20:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

==Allegations of Islamic apartheid -- Article for Deletion==
What about these too? These are used far less than is 'Israeli Apartheid'

*]
*]
*]

Your thoughts?] 08:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

:I didn't notice those, thanks for pointing 'em out. I'll wait and see how the other AfDs do before I try nominating those though. ] 20:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Israeli Apartheid is overwhelmingly more a legit term and topic than are those others above. I have no idea why you chose the one with the most reliable sources and most use in society as the one to delete.] 22:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

== Re : Request for undeletion ==

Page userfied as ]. - ''Best regards'', ] 09:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

== image ==

I'm not sure what purpose you thought suggesting that image be added. Do not do that again. --] 09:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

:edit a dead guy's article about it ] 10:23, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

:: I'm afraid I do not understand that response. --] 12:40, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

== Image:Cbwhat.JPG listed for deletion ==
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ''']<font color="green">.</font>]''' 10:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC) <!-- Template:Idw --> ''']<font color="green">.</font>]''' 10:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

== Zaku AfD ==

Hi Jtrainor, thanks for your note, I'm working on it right now. If you notice something similar in the future the process to follow is here: ]. Thanks for reminding me that I forgot to follow the process... ] (]) 20:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

== Mobile suit articles ==

Please, stop blindly reverting these articles. You do not ] them, and they are in need of better sourcing to ], as well as a great deal of style cleanup and rewriting to describe the subjects from a ]. In particular, the old, stat-heavy, tabled infobox is problematic: it's overlarge, filled with in-universe statistics, and completely lacking in the sort of information an infobox in an encyclopedia of the real world needs.

Touching the articles you think you own is not vandalism. I highly suggest you make yourself familiar with what ] means on Misplaced Pages. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 16:24, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

:I highly suggest you not put words in my mouth. I'm reverting them because your edits are a ham-handed hack and slash job and are significantly detrimental to their quality, not because I think I own them.
:Your edits to the Jagd Doga article in particular are vandalism because you arn't even cleaning up your mess, just removing a bunch of stuff and tossing tags on willy-nilly. ] 16:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
::All I've removed from those articles are the massive infoboxes filled with statistics, and yes, those need to go. They're the kind of thing that belong on fansites, not an encyclopedia of the real world. Why is it necessary to know the exact weight of a fictional object? Or its exact model of equally-fictional engine? What encyclopedic purpose does that serve?

::As for the cleanup tags, I highly recommend that you ''carefully'' read the cleanup guides linked from each tag. They're telling you exactly what I'm telling you now.

::As for accusing me of "ham-handed hack and slash," your reverts have also removed italics corrections, typo corrections, header fixes, and other miscellaneous edits. Pay attention to what you're doing. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 16:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

For example, in ...
#You replace an infobox designed based on the advice at ] with one filled with in-universe trivia
#You add an additional non-free image in violation of ]
#You change the headers from level 2 to level 3, when there is no level 2 header to begin with
#You remove the italics for "Mobile Suit Gundam", the proper name of a longform work
#You bold "all range attacks" for no reason I can figure out
#You replace a much-more awkward phrasing of the Zeong's attacks

So, what the hell are you doing? - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 19:16, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
:Were you planning on explaining? I know you're online and editing, and I believe I deserve some sort of explanation for these wholesale reverts. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 20:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
::Hello? You're reverting yet again, with no explanation here, at ], on my talk page, on the article talk pages, or even in the edit summaries. Were you planning on explaining yourself? - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 07:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
:::You've obviously made up your mind on the subject. I fail to see how anything I can say will possibly change your viewpoint, so why bother? ] 08:02, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
::::Well, you're allowed to decide that interacting with other users isn't productive and abandon an issue, but you don't get to blindly revert without comment while doing so. I would much rather you made your voice heard, by participating in discussion in any of a half-dozen places. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 08:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

And you're back to revert warring without discussion, often reintroducing images slated to be deleted because of fair-use issues, and indiscriminately removing cleanup and cleanup tags. Please stop this. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 07:12, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Given your past history, you are hardly in a position to point fingers. ] 07:16, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
:This doesn't address the problem. ''You are reintroducing images slated to be deleted because of fair-use issues, and indiscriminately removing cleanup and cleanup tags.''

:You also need to carefully read ]. The reason I created a new infobox in the first place was because the old infobox (in addition to being rather ugly) included excessive, unencyclopedic in-universe detail and no real-world detail at all. There's a fruitful discussion at ], where you are conspicuously absent. Preemptively accusing me of disregarding your arguments is a bit silly when I've done my best to respond to any sort of communication that didn't accuse me of being part of a shadowy conspiracy (and even most of those) or compared my actions to those of Nazi Germany.

:If you have a problem with that infobox, please, PLEASE, participate civilly in a discussion ''somewhere''. I don't care where. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 07:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

You did it , and still haven't made any comments on talk pages anywhere. You don't own these articles. You don't get right of refusal over any edits made to them. Can you please join some discussion somewhere, preferably without accusations of conspiracy? - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 02:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

== Please change your userpage ==

Please remove the "List of people who should not be able to use the edit button". It is ], including ]. In the same vein, you may wish to revisit your use of the phrase "Jewish conspiracy". Thanks. ] 19:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

:The jewish conspiracy thing is something that appeared when someone was quoted in FYAD on the somethingawful forums a while ago. It doesn't mean anything at all. ] 19:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

== Blocked ==

I have blocked you for 24 hours, since you have outright stated you have no intention to discuss your continued reversions to those three Gundam articles. Discussing disputed edits/reverts is not optional. Either stop reverting and drop the issue, or engage in discussion; you seem to want to have your cake and eat it. &ndash; ] 20:55, 1 July 2007 (UTC)



== dear good user ==
I would like ] thank you for helping out ], but ] actually does mean taking a ] while the ] of a ] while it is ]<small>citation needed</small> air. Please refer to ]

== A Man In Black, etc ==

Hiya. Please do actually talk to AMIB sometime. The entire recent history for those MSN-0X articles is you, Malik and him reverting over and over. Honestly, if this continues as it has it'll end in a bad way and all three of you will all suffer in some way and the article will end up how none of you want it. I know you don't like AMIB but evidently he's not going to let this drop so you're going to have to do ''something'' about it.<br>On another note I've noticed that since your block expired you've replied once or twice to AMIB and those weren't the most constructive comments ever made. All he wants is for you to discuss things ''somewhere''. &ndash; ] 20:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

:AMIB's contributions to the articles in question have lowered their quality rather than raising it. He has insulted me and my friend MalikCarr (violating WP:CIVIL in the process), and has been attempting to delete large numbers of Gundam-related images, a pattern which is not out of the ordinary for him with regards to other disputes (see the whole Misplaced Pages: Final Fantasy talk page etc, there is at least one user there who has had EVERYTHING he uploads tagged for deletion by AMIB). ] 04:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

::That doesn't really address anything I said. What counts as raising or lowering quality is clearly subjective, and the main point I'm trying to make is that you can't carry on blanket reverting with just the occasional snide comment (AMIB isn't the only one here who has violated ]). Secondly, clearing out inappropriately-used fair use images per ] is a co-ordinated effort across the wiki. See ] and ], and if you think AMIB is being a dick with images try having a discussion with ] or ] about it. I myself have gone through people's logs deleting tonnes and tonnes of their uploads. Trust me, this is not AMIB on one of his one-man crusades. &ndash; ] 14:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free images without good sources or rationale need to be deleted, and ] strictly limits how Misplaced Pages uses non-free images. It sucks in a way, but it is the way things are. If I weren't tagging the images, Durin or ed g2s or TTN or Jeff Gustafson or Betacommand or Carnildo would be. As for ], I stepped in when I noticed a dispute over non-free images becoming heated, and ended up the new target of rancor from the user already on tilt. Unfortunately, that happens.

Now. I haven't meant any offense to you, and I would like to actually collaborate with you in working on articles. Your pattern of reverting every single one of my edits to Gundam articles with the edit summary "rv" makes this nearly impossible. Would you please engage in civil discussion with me somewhere? I could link you somewhere, but just anywhere that isn't "Go away A Man In Black" or "Looks like a deletionist is trying to ruin our articles." I didn't come here looking for a confrontation.

That said, there is some unfortunate business that needs dealing with. If you continue removing "No fair use rationale" tags without replacing them with proper ], I will unfortunately be forced to block you. This is exposing Misplaced Pages to significant lawsuit risk, and blatantly violates ] to boot. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 04:35, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

===The Images===
Hi, I have noticed the commotion here and had a look at the actual images. While Man in Black there has not shown the best behaviour, please be aware that these policies exist on Misplaced Pages to protect the rights of the artists - most of whom you will find are not at all happy about their work being used on Misplaced Pages.
# I think this image: ] could be saved. But you need to specify where ''exactly'' it came from. It is not enough to say "promo image". You need to specify the magazine (and edition) or a specific website where it came from. And then you need to provide a fair use rationale as described (I could help you out there if you are confused).
# The website from which the sketch images came: http://www.mahq.net/ are not taken directly from the magazines, so you cannot use them (without permission) even under "fair use" - if you would obtain the images from the magazines directly then you could use them under "fair use" without permission, provided that you specify a fair use rationale as already mentioned above by others.--] 03:50, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

==Anime Detour==

Unless you'd care to post on the talk page what sort of POV is being pushed in the article, stop adding a tag that claims it's there. ] 22:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

:I have not added a POV tag to the article. The only tag I've added to that article is a cleanup tag to the history section, which is in need of a cleanup. --''']''' (]) 22:52, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

== Accusations of bad faith ==

Why have you repeatedly accused ] of bad faith? Please explain on the appropriate pages. --] 20:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

:Check his edit history. On top of that, check the articles which are the subject of http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/F90_Gundam_Formula_90. It should be blatantly obvious he didn't read any of them, and instead simply mass-nommed.

Not that he's read any of the other articles either, except for perhaps a brief glance; otherwise he would not be using almost the exact same text for every Gundam AfD he's started, all of them referencing the material in question as being from a comic, when even a cursory glance at the articles in question say that the stuff is from an anime. ] 20:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
:Why would you claim it is obvious he has not read them? I think there is very legitimate concern over the notability of those articles. --] 20:20, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
::Go look at some of the mass-nommed articles in question. http://en.wikipedia.org/Gundam_%28mobile_suit%29 in particular is very well written and sourced, as is the Zaku II article and several others. He didn't even add the AfD tag to all of them. ] 20:22, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
:::I've clarified that nomination, it's only about one particular mobile suit; he is only providing a list of similar articles that should be considered for deletion under similar criteria. --] 20:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

== Re: AMIB's edits ==

I've been watching several Gundam articles for a while now, and to be honest I don't see how his edits were "destructive" at all. That would imply to me that he's doing things such as adding false statements, blanking the page, etc., not changing the infobox to something more concise. If anything, this feels like you're holding some sort of grudge against him. ] 17:25, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

:If you don't see how changing the best Gundam articles currently on the wiki (besides Gundam (mobile suit)) to a crappy looking thing with an infobox that makes little sense and tags bukkaked everywhere isn't destructive, I really don't know what to tell you. It's especially glaring in the case of the Jagd Doga article-- compare the version I keep reverting to with AMIBs' and it becomes obvious. ] 21:16, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

::The short infobox that tells the most basic details (Where did it first appear? Who designed it? What faction uses it? etc.) doesn't make sense, yet the humongous waste of space and laundry list of weapons, pointless stats, etc., that is the old-school infobox does? I don't understand.

::You're right, the in-universe tag on the Jagd Doga is in a poor position, but that can be fixed easily enough without requiring an edit war. Other than that poorly-placed tag on Jagd Doga and that smaller infobox, there is ''no difference'' between the real meat of the article in his version and your/MalikCarr's version. ] 22:09, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

== Userspace deletions ==

The only pages I deleted in your userspace were redirects to nonexistent pages (] and ]). I must have been cleaning up a list of broken redirects. The target page, ], had been previously deleted by ]. I suggest you take the deletion up with Krimpet. ] 13:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

==WP notability fiction==
You might want to check out the discussion going on over there. There's a link from the anime and manga wikiproject, btw. ] 01:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

== Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Paptimus Scirocco ==
I agree that this article needs to be fixed, and I've made a few more changes to it, but I would not delete or redirect it considering the epic battle that took place between him and the protagonist ]. ] 14:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hi there. There have been some comments left on the WQA forum regarding your dispute with Necator. Feel free to take a look ]. The consensus seems to be that a source is needed to justify the the claims about the missile withstanding the blast (regardless of how true it is). Remember, the guideline for wikipedia is: ]. However, if you think that claim is nonsense, then you need to find sources to back up your position, in order to avoid posting ]. And if you both have conflicting sources: well, that's not really a problem, since it can be written as "Bob claims x, however Alice claims y". Misplaced Pages's place isn't to determine who's correct, just to report what can be reliably sourced. Best, --] <sup><small>(])</small></sup> 23:09, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

:Do you have some diff's to support that? I'm not really invested enough to mount my own investigation here. --] <sup><small>(])</small></sup> 00:31, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

::Look, I'm not really interested in digging into histories. If you give me some diff's, I'll give you my opinion, but otherwise, I don't care enough to do a POV-investigation. (I'll give some suggestions on how to resolve that in WQA though). As far as the IP being Necator's: have you done a checkuser? If not, please don't make sock-accusations with proof. It's not terribly civil. Best, --] <sup><small>(])</small></sup> 00:41, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

:::Please see my comments on WQA. I'm personally done here. (Nothing personal, I'm just not getting into this). --] <sup><small>(])</small></sup> 00:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

== RE:Necator ==

I've fully protected the page, because it's in dispute, and so you guys can have some time to yell at each other and work it out (hopefully) on the talk page (not that I'm implying you're yelling at each other, but it often turns into a yelling match). I'm just still trying to figure out how out of all the admins I'm always the one receiving these (to me random) requests. -]<small>(]·])</small> 04:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Emot-munch.gif)==
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] 15:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

== Request for mediation ==

I have filed a request for mediation over the Gundam edit warring at ]. Please sign your acceptance or rejection over this issue. ] 05:55, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

== It's now a deletion review ==

Hello, '''Jtrainor'''. I'm alerting all of the editors that took part in the ] that it is now a deletion review, as seen in ]. I felt that you may want to lend your voice about this topic in its deletion review as well. ]. After reading that, I'm sure that I won't have to tell you to watch for it being put up for deletion again, if this deletion review doesn't come out as '''Overturn and delete'''. I'll see you around. ] 20:53, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


==N64 games and lists==
Hi, I noticed you were one of the few people that thought the List of Japanese Nintendo 64 games had some useful information and it should be meged or saved, and I wanted to invite you to the orignal N64 talk page to see what we've been working on, however the two normal page maintainers seem to not want to discuss it even the one that tried to delete the Japanese page. So far it seems to be pretty good, with one entry per program and alternate names and region names listed in a separate column next to the main Misplaced Pages title used here. Let us know what you think of the examples we've made there. Have a great day.](] 13:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC))

== ] ==

It takes about a minute to write a quick fair use rationale to satisfy the "no rat" people. I've added it in the interest of not smothering the flames of another possible war, but just an FYI. ] 00:03, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

:BTW, the List of people that should not have the edit button probably violates ]: ''Material that can be construed as attacking other editors, including the recording of perceived flaws.'' ] 00:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

==Request for mediation accepted==
{| class="messagebox" style="width:90%"
|- |-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Common sense is so rare these days. ] (]) 02:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
|]
|A ] to which you were are a party has been ].<br>You can find more information on the case subpage, ].</center><br>
::''For the Mediation Committee,'' ''']''' 04:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
|} |}
<small><center>This message delivered by ], an automated bot account ] by the ] to perform case management.<br>If you have questions about this bot, please ].</small></center>


== User page ==


==Evidence phase open - Manning naming dispute==
Hi Jtrainor. I have some concerns about your user page. Would you mind editing it to conform with ]? Thanks in advance. --] 00:29, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


Dear Jtrainor.
:My user page complies with WP:USERPAGE already. I see no changes that need to be made. ] 12:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


This is just a quick courtesy notice. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at ]. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at ]. '''Please add your evidence by September 19, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes.''' You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, ]. For a guide to the arbitration process, see ]. For the Arbitration Committee, ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 23:40, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
::I disagree, I was thinking of "Misplaced Pages is useless crap because anyone can write anything down" and the section entitled "List of people whom I think should not be able to use the edit button". From the policy page, under "What may I not have on my user page?"; "Material that can be construed as attacking other editors" and "There is broad agreement that you may not include in your user space material that is likely to bring the project into disrepute, or which is likely to give widespread offense". I consider those two sections to be in breach of our policies and I am asking you nicely to modify them to conform with our goal of encyclopedia. Thanks again for your consideration. --] 16:53, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


== Categories ==
:::It doesn't attack any specific editors and it's an opinion piece. Misplaced Pages is not censored and I highly doubt a bit of a rant on a talk page is going to attract negative attention from the world at large. ] 17:12, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


Hey - when you add a category tag to an article (as with Breen), it's good to make sure that the category actually exists. The category in question was deleted a few years ago as a result of ]. ] (]) 14:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
::::] and ] are specific people. --] 17:18, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
:Ah, okay, my bad. ] (]) 03:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


== ] ==
:::::All it says is that I think they should not be able to use the edit button. If they complain (and AMIB hasn't despite having seen my user page plenty of times in the time we've dealt with each other), I'll remove the stuff. ] 17:19, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
::::::I disagree with your interpretation; I think you should ask whether these entries on your user page are actually advancing the project. I think they are not, and rather than argue further with you, I have raised the matter centrally ] so that others may have an input. Best wishes, --] 19:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691988767 -->


== Banned from posting sources, replay ==
:::::::I think you should ask yourself if all those userboxes on YOUR userpage "advance the project any". The long and the short of the matter is that my userpage has had that stuff up for months and no one other than Necator and yourself have complained any, and Necator only brought it up as an attempt to muddy the waters from the fact that his complaint has no merit. ] 19:52, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


Hello. I would like to replay to you here since my posts are being deleted in the report. I was never reported and that admin keeps banning me. He appears in every discussion I have with the reported user. I'm not hiding I'm the same person because I haven't done anything wrong. You said that all are saying I'm a sock but that is not the case. Only FkpCascais and HighInBC are doing that. In the referenced discussions you can see that none of the following editors had a single complaint against me: Joy , Director, Ąnαșταη, Robert McClenon, Brustopher , Tuvixer, No such user, Shokatz, Markewilliams, Relichal1, LjL,AlbinoFerret . FkpCascais is calling HighInBC to ban people for him and all that is done without any report (I'm not the only case). I've been active for a few month in the referenced discussions and you can see that there is no reason to ban me. I feel I haven't done anything wrong by posting sources and when the page protection expired I'll post them again. From the reports against FkpCascais it is obvious how he deals with people who he don't agree with. I had a quite of struggle on Serbs of Croatia article with him. I opened a RfC, discussed for months, he tried to block me and another user when we were the only one who opposed him. I managed to bring that RfC to other editors who joined. Then FkpCascais became very rude to them also, and he was finally reported by one of those editors and banned from that discussion. Sorry if I bothered you, but you seemed interested to why I'm being banned without any report. I will keep posting sources to the talk page in any way since those sources can help someone. ] (]) 17:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
== Re: POINT violation ==


== Working to remove Mark Roosevelt POV tag ==
Let's deal with this in pieces. First, about the edit-warring. Have you taken the issue to the talk page? Perhaps there you can work something out. As for the incorrect warnings, just revert them, just make sure that you're not violating 3RR. My second piece of advice is to make sure you don't violate 3RR. I'm also presuming that the article in question is ]. Looking at the history, I didn't see a recent 3RR violation by anyone, can you please point me to the diffs? If you think the users are the same, and are circumventing 3RR, not just editing constructively, open a ]. Also, if going to the talk page doesn't help, open a ] request; I'd mediate the case if you would like. I hope this helps. Regards, ] ] 16:19, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
:OK, I've taken a look at the history, and have seen you revert 4 times on the 27th, and the other person at least 4 times on the 27th. You both are in violation of the 3RR. Don't edit the article for now; violating the rule further will most likely result in all of you being blocked. I really recommend taking this to the 3RR noticeboard, and I also recommend opening a mediation cabal case. Again, I'd be willing to mediate. Regards, ] ] 17:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


Thank you for your work on ]'s page. I am working to address your concerns regarding neutrality. May we talk here or shall I comment on the "]" page? Thanks. ] (]) 14:22, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
== Necator ==


:Hit me up whereever. My primary concerns, as noted on that page, is that it's current state was created basically by a PR flack from the university the guy works/worked at. ] (]) 14:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
If he continues, let me know and I will block him. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 13:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


::Thank you. I will work on it and move any additional discussion to the "]" page. ] (]) 18:07, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
== Template:Mobile Suit (unused redirect) ==


:::Good morning - Revisiting this issue. Looks like sources were added back in July. However, I didn't want to remove the maintenance template until we touched base. Looking forward to your response. --] (]) 16:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
I've noticed {{tl|Mobile Suit}} which redirects to {{tl|Infobox Mobile Suit}} but {{tl|Mobile Suit}} has no links.<br/>Is there a reason to keep {{tl|Mobile Suit}}? &ndash; ] 18:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


== ]: Voting now open! ==
I'm pretty sure it's just a leftover. ] 18:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Jtrainor. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
Any objection to {{tl|tfd}} delete nomination? &ndash; ] 19:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Nuke it. If it turns out to be needed it can always be brought back, after all. ] 20:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you and we'll see where the discussion goes. &ndash; ] 21:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/6&oldid=750545473 -->


== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
== TfD nomination of ] ==
] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> — ] 21:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Jtrainor. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
== Template:Infobox Mobile Suit ==
Please help me understand, as one of the contributors, recent ] activity by expanding ] and thank you. &ndash; ] 18:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
'''Topic updated''' &ndash; ] 01:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
'''Topic updated''' &ndash; ] 03:21, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/06&oldid=813406902 -->


== Select Survey Invite ==
'''Topic updated''' &ndash; ] 10:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.
==Request for mediation not accepted==
{| class="messagebox" style="width:90%"
|-
|]
|A ] to which you were are a party was ] and has been delisted.<br>You can find more information on the case subpage, ].</center><br>
::''For the Mediation Committee,'' ''']''' 04:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
|}
<small><center>This message delivered by ], an automated bot account ] by the ] to perform case management.<br>If you have questions about this bot, please ].</small></center>


Your survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_8ppceiOEKZAn8gZ&Q_CHL=gl
== ] ==


I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Misplaced Pages that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.
{| class="messagebox" style="width:80%"
|-
|]
|
|A ] to which you are a party is now active, and your input is requested. Further information is available at the Mediation location, ].


Sincere thanks for your help! ] (]) 01:17, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
''Kind regards'',<br>] 23:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
|}


== Re:Return of the IP == == PROD ==


Articles that have previously been through AFD are not eligible to be PROD'd, as info. -- ] (]) 01:17, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
I'd recommend you post something on ]; the admins there should be able to figure it out. I'm not an admin, and thus can't view deleted contribs and such, so I may not be of much help. Regards, ] ] 21:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


:Oh, good to know. ] (]) 02:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
== GundamRes ==


== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==
Even if it's a disruptive account, the point still stands that it ''is'' written in an in-universe perspective and consists entirely of plot summary. ] 01:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Jtrainor. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
:How am I wrong? There is ''nothing'' in the article that has any out-of-universe perspective: no interviews, no information on its creation, etc. Just a huge, long, plot summary. ] 01:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
::Its a wikistalking and sockpuppet issue. There is a lot of Out of Universe perspective in the Psyco Gundam article, but this nice editor chases around with his sockpuppets to harass trainor and malik.... Just another example of gaming the system to drive away good editors by those who do not remember that wikipedia IS a specialized encyclopedia and worship at the altar of FICT. ] 01:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
:::...why is why I re-added the tag and added the {{tl|plot}} tag. I am not a sockpuppet of anybody, therefore I would like a reason for why '''my''' addition of the tag was reverted. ] 01:33, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
::::Throwing gasoline on the fire, eh? I'm sorry, but instigating problems is bad form Hbdragon. ] 01:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
:::::I'm sorry, but reverting with a summary of "You're wrong" without explaining why I'm wrong? Also poor form. ] 02:22, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
::::::Be nice, Kyaa. In hbdragon's defense, he really has no idea what's been going on all this time. ] 03:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
:::::::Ok. I'll be nice. :P I like dragons anyways! :P ] 13:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
==Edit warring block==
I have blocked you for 72 hours for engaging in ] with ], ], and ] on multiple articles for an extended period of time. <font face="Broadway">]'']</font>'' 03:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
:I will not dispute this block ] (]) 05:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/06&oldid=866998196 -->


== GundamsRus == == Happy Holidays ==


{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
I don't know why you're so up in arms about it &ndash; AGK removed that plus the latest AMIB-MC exchange, effectively making it a dead issue. Obviously another RfM is going to be required for the issues regarding GundamsRus, but from what you just said, it doesn't look like any mediation request will get off the ground. ] (]) 04:31, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]

|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" |
:(replying here since I'm blocked) For what it is worth, I do appreciate that you are trying to help. It's not your fault this mess exploded in all directions. ] (]) 05:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Best wishes for this holiday season! Thank you for your Wiki contributions in 2018. May 2019 be prosperous and joyful. --] (]) 22:56, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

'''Noël ~ καλά Χριστούγεννα ~ З Калядамі ~ חנוכה שמח ~ Gott nytt år!'''
==Gundam Mediation==
|}
You should dump that. AGK has removed my challenges to hbdragon as "disruption" despite there being no compunction that non-parties do not comment on the mediation case page. I don't see his mediation as being fair unless he's willing to follow the four pillars and remember that wikipedia, and all the pages within, is the encyclopedia that ANYONE can edit. ] (]) 18:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

:i was actually wondering if that was going to be removed or not &ndash; on arbitration cases at least, users make statements and threaded conversation (as we just did) is usually disallowed, with clerks occasionally refactoring it into other statements . I'm not sure if he would let you make your own statement &ndash; I'm as new to mediation as everyone else is.
:For the record, mediation is the only shot at resolving this long-standing conflict, and I urge you to not reject it outright. If it fails just because the parties cannot come to an accord, that's one thing, but if it fails on account of the withdrawal of one of the parties, that just looks bad. I'm following through with all steps of ] if need be, and I hope this is the first and only step I need to take. ] (]) 19:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
::I'm less keen on this accomplishing anything than I was 24 hours ago. If AGK is going to squelch communication, why bother? And to label our discussion as "disruption" is insulting and betrays a bias in my opinion. He should recuse himself and find another less biased mediator to replace himself. ] (]) 20:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
:::Oh, just to clarify, the second paragraph was for Jtarinor, not to you. ] (]) 21:46, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
::::Kya, you arn't involved in the mediation, so of course your messages are being removed. Chill out a little and let's see what AGK does with regards to the mediation. I am in possession of information that you are not about this-- wait and see. ] (]) 23:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
:::::When I correct, in good faith, obvious falsehoods and inaccuracies, it should not be labelled as disruption. I may not be a party, but it is incorrect in many ways for my good faith responses to be labeled disruption. Then again, its obvious that Hbdragon has read my responses to him so I guess all is even here. :P ] (]) 02:41, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

== Gundam ==

The problem is - to an outside observer, it appears that nothing <i>is</i> being done. There are dozens of these pages that haven't been seriously edited for months, if not years. And I'm not particularly targeting Gundam - it's just one example of many fiction-based subjects where there are <i>swathes</i> of really poor articles; badly written, unsourced, in-universe, nothing but plot summaries, and so on. ] - it's utterly pointless in its current state. Even when articles are sourced, they're often merely sourced to primary sources. Most of these articles would be better off in a specialised Wiki; they don't belong in an encyclopedia. Oh, and don't take my talk page personally; I was quoting someone else, best to read his talkpage for the details. <b>]</b> 19:01, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

==Your recent reversions==

I think it's quite possible were reverted because they were not particularly ]. I ask you to please remember that insulting other editors is not productive or appropriate, even on a humour page. Revert-warring is also not the best approach. Thanks - <font face="comic sans ms"><b>]</b> ]<font color="navy">♦</font>]</font> 05:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

== December 2007 ==
{{{icon|] }}}Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from {{{{{subst|}}}#if::Image:VX2.jpg|]|Misplaced Pages}}. When removing text, please specify a reason in the ] and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the ]. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the ]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> ] 18:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


== Misclicked ==
== Do be civil, and do your homework next time ==


rollback but the undo-ing was intentional. Gasoline on a fire and all that. If you're bothered enough, please read the archives. ]] 14:47, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Re: ] ()
:You have no policy-based reason whatsoever to remove my post from the talk page. ] (]) 15:19, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
::Unhelpful speculation is just that... unhelpful. You have no basis to bring up unfounded rumours, either. Please desist. There's enough salacious material there as is that is based on facts. If anyone knew about some Spanish contributions causing problems, they would have already been brought up at that page. ] <sub>(] / ])</sub> 15:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
:::I've done some investigation on my own and found out that the rumors are far from unsubstantiated. Fram offended LauraHale, who has subsequently used her ties to the WMF to get him unjustly punished. ] (]) 23:20, 26 June 2019 (UTC)


== Speculation at ] ==
You don't get a free pass on ] and ], even when the editor you're insulting is the figurehead of the project. Calling a fellow editor 'ignorant' isn't acceptable around here.


I have removed the section (and good faith responses) you recently started at ] since it contained wild speculation about both Fram and another user with clear and forseeable real-life consequences. Please be more mindful on how such posts may affect ''actual'' persons. ] (]) 00:16, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
In any case, if you want to 'take issue' with another editor, the appropriate place to do so is on that editor's talk page; it's not a Village Pump issue. Finally, before you go off half-cocked the next time, it's a good idea to read that editor's talk page ''anyway'', even if you want to sound off someplace more publically in the end. If you had done so in this case, you would have noticed that Jimbo has already been asked about this very issue: ]. The remarks published by the BBC were incomplete and taken out of context, and Jimbo had already responded to concerns similar to yours twenty minutes before your post to the Pump, and hours before you the thread there.
:It's not wild speculation because it, you know, ACTUALLY HAPPENED. ] (]) 03:19, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
::That's what you say, without any evidence to back it up. Knock it off, or I will block you for BLP violations. ] <sub>(] / ])</sub> 12:14, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
:::You do realize that anyone can click someone's contribs and find things out the exact same things I did? You are too late to hush this up in any case; people are already talking about it outside Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 14:26, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
::::I am not responsible for preventing disruption outside of Misplaced Pages. People can and do say all kinds of garbage at other sites. Some editors have, with diffs, pointed out that evidence could suggest the WMF may have a COI in this instance, while other editors have given evidence that this is not the case. What has not been said is that they have "proof" of the motives of others. I've seen your edit history, and you have done a good job in the past of removing unsourced, speculative material from articles. Why you would promulgate such drivel ("It's a fact!") is perplexing, as you wouldn't allow this in an article. But if you must, go to one of those other sites with a much lower standard of care, lower standards for "facts" and lower standards for the well-being of other people. They will welcome you with open arms. ] <sub>(] / ])</sub> 14:52, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
:::::There are literally other people discussing the exact same stuff I've mentioned on WP:FRAM right now, and I can't help noticing that you arn't trying to pull the same act with them. ] (]) 18:51, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
::::::I'm hardly omniscient. I happened to notice your statement. You have no idea how much I don't want to say this, because I utterly detest this type of admin work, but if you'll point out the diff where unsubstantiated aspersions and say-so occurred, I guess I'll have to deal with it. Otherwise it is just another unsubstantiated aspersion. I should point out that I know the difference between "A+B looks funny if it were to equal C" and "A+B=C". ] <sub>(] / ])</sub> 20:14, 27 June 2019 (UTC) ] <sub>(] / ])</sub> 20:14, 27 June 2019 (UTC)


== User page deleted ==
Jimbo's staked out a reasonable position, and though I can't read your mind, I suspect it's within reasonable shouting distance of your opinion. So, there it is. Either Jimbo is lying about what he said, or he was the innocent victim of some overzealous trimming on the part of the BBC. In the first case, you can call Jimbo a liar someplace else; this isn't the place for it. (We're busy writing an encyclopedia here.) In the latter, you probably owe an apology. ](]) 02:12, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Your user page, ], was tagged by another editor as ''G10: Attack page or negative unsourced BLP'' and I have deleted it. Please do not recreate it or continue to speculate on the habits, editing and behavior of other editors or it will also be deleted. If you want to write this type of content, please do it on some other website, message board or blog, not on Misplaced Pages. Thank you. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 00:26, 3 July 2019 (UTC)


== A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process ==
:I'm being perfectly civil, if a bit blunt. If my words are unpleasent to read, don't read them. ] (]) 02:23, 9 December 2007 (UTC)


Hello!
::If you didn't want your words to be read, you wouldn't put them on the Village Pump. I've not called you out on your oversight there because I was hoping that you'd take the opportunity to comment on the information that you &ndash; apparently &ndash; weren't aware of when you first posted. I still hope that you will. ](]) 03:36, 9 December 2007 (UTC)


The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate ] that followed ] you’ve been part of.
:::Oh, I do think I'll be keeping away from the Village Pump. I'd rather not have even more people picking through my wiki business and looking for things they can make more trouble for me with. In your favor, I do exclude you from this as you have merely commented and not actually done anything. ] (]) 06:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


Please fill out to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
==I have no problem with you, since I don't know you==
I do have problems with the personal attacks on your User page and with your comments on the Village Pump. <font face="Comic Sans">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 21:11, 9 December 2007 (UTC)


The privacy policy for this survey is . This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
== Who's the sock? ==


Thank you for your participation, ] 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
If you're going to accuse someone of being a sockpuppet (), it's helpful to identify the puppeteer. If you can make a convincing case that an editor is a sockpuppet, he can be blocked, particularly if the sock account is being used to prosecute an edit war or engage in harrassment.
<!-- Message sent by User:Trizek (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=User:Trizek_(WMF)/sandbox/temp_MassMessage_list&oldid=19553910 -->


== ArbCom 2019 election voter message ==
However, if you ''don't'' have any evidence to support the suggestion of sockpuppetry, ''don't'' level such accusations. Edit summaries like ("''you have not made a single positive contribution to this article''") are never appropriate. If you don't want to work with &ndash; or receive messages from &ndash; another editor, that is your choice. If, however, you are unprepared to interact courteously and civilly, then you need to step back from the articles where you're in conflict. ](]) 02:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
:I suggest you contact ] for details. I don't feel like rehashing all this again. Also, stop watching my contribs to find things to bother me about, please. ] (]) 03:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
::On your advice, I've asked MalikCarr for information. Why don't you want to tell me why you think GundamsRus is a sock? Looking at his block log, he apparently had a rough start on Misplaced Pages...but as an admin there's not a lot I can do if he's keeping his nose clean ''now''. ](]) 03:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
:Er, I still don't see how GundamsRus is a sockpuppet; it would probably be best to stop describing him that way: . If you don't want to respond to his comments, that's fine. If you want to archive them, that's fine too. Just don't call him a sock. ](]) 03:57, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=926750232 -->


== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==
:Question: Are you calling GundamsRus a sockpuppet because he sometimes isn't logged in when he edits? If so, you should be aware that that isn't sockpuppetry&mdash;it's just carelessness or technical difficulties. I've asked him to be more careful about logging in before he edits, just because using a mix of IPs along with his account makes it more difficult to follow discussions and disputes. In the meantime, I would ask you to just ignore it if it happens, and ]. You guys already have a lot of legitimate grounds for disagreement&mdash;there's no need to get bent out of shape over a minor technical detail.
:Note that as far as policies like the ] go, the 'electric fence' line is at three reverts per person, not three reverts per account. He doesn't gain any sort of advantage in an editing dispute by being logged out, and any blocks he might receive would apply equally to him whether logged in or not. ](]) 15:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC)


<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
:(update) I have given GundamsRus some suggestions about how he might be able to log in; he's apparently having technical difficulties with one of his computers that causes the login process to stall. ](]) 19:10, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
==Undoing my redirects==
Unless you have available sources or some sort of reason as to how they can improved, please leave the articles as redirects. We have a large problem with fiction articles, and leaving them to rot does us no good. ] (]) 00:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
:There is no "we" here. I have had ample opportunity to examine what you are doing and it is not improving anything. ] (]) 00:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=990307860 -->


== ANI Notice ==
::For one, it is saving us from thousands of AfDs, and the deletion of possibly reusable content. And you probably don't really care about the various other reasons, so I won't go into those. If you would like to try to change ] to allow for unsourced content, be my guest, but please do not reflect your view upon a couple of articles that clearly fail it. ] (]) 00:56, 15 December 2007 (UTC)


] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (]) 20:44, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
:::As stated, there is no "us". Your method of operation is as follows: a) redirect articles against consensus. Edit war to preserve the redirects. b) If you lose, nominate the article for AfD and call in several meatpuppets to help you.


== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==
I have run into similar editing practices before, though not on so large a scale. Don't try to sweet-talk me, because I will have none of it. ] (]) 00:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC)


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
::::Again, please try to change the way things work on a higher level instead of playing around with a few articles. If you are going to persist with stalking me, please do some research before reverting. Your last revert was fully discussed for a good while. ] (]) 01:09, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
:::::Stalking you? I reverted a few of your edits only, until I noticed the Arbcom case about you and the sheer volume of your stuff. I plan to wait and see on this one as the stuff you are doing most assuredly violates a number of policies. ] (]) 06:01, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
:I'd like to remind TTN that per ] they are not his redirects. ] (]) 08:16, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>
The ArbCom does not think that TTN's actions are violationg policy, as the passing principle regarding TTN is that only of cautioning or admonishing...no probation, edit parole, or any punishment that they would give out for edit warring and breaking policy. ] (]) 08:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
:And thus we're silenced as fiction is driven off of wikipedia. Fantastic. ArbCom "justifies" his disruption. Beautiful. Shall we all bow down before the Cabal now? I think not. ] (]) 09:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
::This just isn't any ]...this is the ultimate authority on resolving user disputes. Some detractors of the "real-world notability" notion of FICT brought a case against TTN, and the ArbCom looks to say that they don't think it's disruptive (I say "looks to" since who knows an Arb member might suddenly think otherwise). If those detractors themselves become disruptive, then I think ''they'' might be put before ArbCom, so, everybody has to tread lightly here. ] (]) 01:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
:::Totally not an ordinary cabal. It is a tainted cabal full of super sekrit lists, shady maneuvers and Keystone cop-like fumbling. ] (]) 06:17, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
::::Okay, I got the secret lists (the Durova case), but I'm not getting the shady maneuvers and Keystone cop-like fumbling. ] (]) 07:36, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
:::::Did you miss the zscout desysopping? The most recent one, that is. ] (]) 07:38, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


</div>
== [[Gundam Mk-II ==
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1124425177 -->


== ANI for Talk:Yasuke ==
...And I point you to ]. MalikCarr ]ly made a change to the wording which hadn't been discussed on the talk page. ''In moderation'', this is an acceptable practice, with some provisos.


] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (] · ]) 16:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
A Man In Black disagreed with the changes, and removed the unsourced statement. This is also a part of the Misplaced Pages process.


== Mysterious account shows up out of nowhere with detailed knowledge of Misplaced Pages's processes ==
Finally, I expect that there will be no further edits to the disputed section until they have discussed things. ](]) 15:47, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


I feel like this should be an automatic reason to checkuser someone. ] (]) 16:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
== ] ==


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
Can you explain to me how it's a violation of WP Policy? ] (]) 15:16, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
:Examine what Torc2 said on the talk page. He explained it before I could. ] (]) 17:05, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== Stalking ==


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
If you feel that you're being stalked by another editor, the best place to go is ], where an administrator can take up the issue.


</div>
Please don't just leave on another user's talk page without being a bit more detailed. ](]) 19:24, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->

Latest revision as of 00:07, 19 November 2024


Welcome!

The Rules

  1. Be cool to me and I'll be cool to you. If you show up here and act like a jerk expect to have your posts removed.
  2. No anon IPs. Log in if you want to talk to me.
  3. No puppets. Self-explanatory.
  4. No Homers
  5. Don't randomly template me instead of attempting to actually talk to me. This is 'shit and run' and will get you nowhere. Especially don't template me about being close to 3RR-- I am quite capable of counting to three and assuming that I can't will most definitely be taken as a personal attack.
  6. Catch-all prove 'em wrong clause:
5a) Yes it is
5b) No it isn't
5c) Yes
5d) No

Deaf Culture

Hi! Just wanted to explain quickly why I removed the Disability template from the Deaf culture page you added. It's been an on and off debate whether the page should have it, but an informal straw poll came to the conclusion that it should stay off the page. The basic reason came down to that though the physical inabilty to hear can be considered a disability (though some would say otherwise; a debate for another time, I'm sure) Deaf Culture is more about the culture that revolves around the Deaf Community. I'd be more than happy to elaborate a bit on this topic if you'd like. Deafgeek (talk) 18:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

I disagree, but I don't really have the time or energy to start a fight over this. Jtrainor (talk) 20:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Your last two AfD nominations

Please read WP:BEFORE before considering nominating articles for deletion. In short, an unreferenced article won't be deleted on notability grounds if the sources can be found easily via a search. I find it generally saves everyone's time if I do a quick search for sources before considering nominating, with Google Books and their news archives being most useful. --Pontificalibus (talk)

Mangum or Magnum

Please double-check the spelling. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 00:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Re: DIREKTOR at WP:AE

Would you mind explaining how exactly my request is "clearly frivolous"? --Joy (talk) 12:38, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

You're complaining because someone made three reverts in -11 days-. Jtrainor (talk) 01:46, 26 September 2012 (UTC)


Arb

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Professionalism and civility and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, Alanscottwalker (talk) 17:35, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Starnbar

The Original Barnstar
Common sense is so rare these days. 88.104.5.244 (talk) 02:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

ref

Evidence phase open - Manning naming dispute

Dear Jtrainor.

This is just a quick courtesy notice. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Evidence. Please add your evidence by September 19, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Seddon 23:40, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Categories

Hey - when you add a category tag to an article (as with Breen), it's good to make sure that the category actually exists. The category in question was deleted a few years ago as a result of some discussion. DS (talk) 14:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Ah, okay, my bad. Jtrainor (talk) 03:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Banned from posting sources, replay

Hello. I would like to replay to you here since my posts are being deleted in the report. I was never reported and that admin keeps banning me. He appears in every discussion I have with the reported user. I'm not hiding I'm the same person because I haven't done anything wrong. You said that all are saying I'm a sock but that is not the case. Only FkpCascais and HighInBC are doing that. In the referenced discussions you can see that none of the following editors had a single complaint against me: Joy , Director, Ąnαșταη, Robert McClenon, Brustopher , Tuvixer, No such user, Shokatz, Markewilliams, Relichal1, LjL,AlbinoFerret . FkpCascais is calling HighInBC to ban people for him and all that is done without any report (I'm not the only case). I've been active for a few month in the referenced discussions and you can see that there is no reason to ban me. I feel I haven't done anything wrong by posting sources and when the page protection expired I'll post them again. From the reports against FkpCascais it is obvious how he deals with people who he don't agree with. I had a quite of struggle on Serbs of Croatia article with him. I opened a RfC, discussed for months, he tried to block me and another user when we were the only one who opposed him. I managed to bring that RfC to other editors who joined. Then FkpCascais became very rude to them also, and he was finally reported by one of those editors and banned from that discussion. Sorry if I bothered you, but you seemed interested to why I'm being banned without any report. I will keep posting sources to the talk page in any way since those sources can help someone. 141.138.59.111 (talk) 17:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Working to remove Mark Roosevelt POV tag

Thank you for your work on Mark Roosevelt's page. I am working to address your concerns regarding neutrality. May we talk here or shall I comment on the "Talk:Mark Roosevelt" page? Thanks. Johnnie Stringfellow (talk) 14:22, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Hit me up whereever. My primary concerns, as noted on that page, is that it's current state was created basically by a PR flack from the university the guy works/worked at. Jtrainor (talk) 14:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. I will work on it and move any additional discussion to the "Talk:Mark Roosevelt" page. Johnnie Stringfellow (talk) 18:07, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Good morning - Revisiting this issue. Looks like sources were added back in July. However, I didn't want to remove the maintenance template until we touched base. Looking forward to your response. --Charlottemj (talk) 16:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jtrainor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jtrainor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Select Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Your survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_8ppceiOEKZAn8gZ&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Misplaced Pages that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 01:17, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

PROD

Articles that have previously been through AFD are not eligible to be PROD'd, as info. -- ferret (talk) 01:17, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Oh, good to know. Jtrainor (talk) 02:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jtrainor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Best wishes for this holiday season! Thank you for your Wiki contributions in 2018. May 2019 be prosperous and joyful. --K.e.coffman (talk) 22:56, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Noël ~ καλά Χριστούγεννα ~ З Калядамі ~ חנוכה שמח ~ Gott nytt år!

Misclicked

rollback but the undo-ing was intentional. Gasoline on a fire and all that. If you're bothered enough, please read the archives. ∯WBG 14:47, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

You have no policy-based reason whatsoever to remove my post from the talk page. Jtrainor (talk) 15:19, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Unhelpful speculation is just that... unhelpful. You have no basis to bring up unfounded rumours, either. Please desist. There's enough salacious material there as is that is based on facts. If anyone knew about some Spanish contributions causing problems, they would have already been brought up at that page. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
I've done some investigation on my own and found out that the rumors are far from unsubstantiated. Fram offended LauraHale, who has subsequently used her ties to the WMF to get him unjustly punished. Jtrainor (talk) 23:20, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Speculation at WP:FRAM

I have removed the section (and good faith responses) you recently started at WP:FRAM since it contained wild speculation about both Fram and another user with clear and forseeable real-life consequences. Please be more mindful on how such posts may affect actual persons. Abecedare (talk) 00:16, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

It's not wild speculation because it, you know, ACTUALLY HAPPENED. Jtrainor (talk) 03:19, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
That's what you say, without any evidence to back it up. Knock it off, or I will block you for BLP violations. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 12:14, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
You do realize that anyone can click someone's contribs and find things out the exact same things I did? You are too late to hush this up in any case; people are already talking about it outside Misplaced Pages. Jtrainor (talk) 14:26, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
I am not responsible for preventing disruption outside of Misplaced Pages. People can and do say all kinds of garbage at other sites. Some editors have, with diffs, pointed out that evidence could suggest the WMF may have a COI in this instance, while other editors have given evidence that this is not the case. What has not been said is that they have "proof" of the motives of others. I've seen your edit history, and you have done a good job in the past of removing unsourced, speculative material from articles. Why you would promulgate such drivel ("It's a fact!") is perplexing, as you wouldn't allow this in an article. But if you must, go to one of those other sites with a much lower standard of care, lower standards for "facts" and lower standards for the well-being of other people. They will welcome you with open arms. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:52, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
There are literally other people discussing the exact same stuff I've mentioned on WP:FRAM right now, and I can't help noticing that you arn't trying to pull the same act with them. Jtrainor (talk) 18:51, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
I'm hardly omniscient. I happened to notice your statement. You have no idea how much I don't want to say this, because I utterly detest this type of admin work, but if you'll point out the diff where unsubstantiated aspersions and say-so occurred, I guess I'll have to deal with it. Otherwise it is just another unsubstantiated aspersion. I should point out that I know the difference between "A+B looks funny if it were to equal C" and "A+B=C". 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:14, 27 June 2019 (UTC) 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:14, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

User page deleted

Your user page, User:Jtrainor/Summary of Fram Drama, was tagged by another editor as G10: Attack page or negative unsourced BLP and I have deleted it. Please do not recreate it or continue to speculate on the habits, editing and behavior of other editors or it will also be deleted. If you want to write this type of content, please do it on some other website, message board or blog, not on Misplaced Pages. Thank you. Liz 00:26, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ANI Notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:44, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ANI for Talk:Yasuke

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 16:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Mysterious account shows up out of nowhere with detailed knowledge of Misplaced Pages's processes

I feel like this should be an automatic reason to checkuser someone. Jtrainor (talk) 16:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)