| Revision as of 09:49, 3 July 2005 editDocu (talk | contribs)97,802 editsm →Junior, Senior← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:27, 19 May 2022 edit undoJ947 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,900 edits rcat |
| (305 intermediate revisions by 86 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
=== ] (common names) === |
|
#REDIRECT ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Redirect category shell| |
|
'''Convention:''' Use the most common name of a person or thing that does not conflict with the names of other people or things. The principal exception is in the case of naming royalty and people with titles. For details of the naming conventions in those cases, see the ] page. |
|
|
|
{{R to section}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{R to project namespace}} |
|
When choosing a name for a page ask yourself: What word would the average user of the Misplaced Pages put into the search engine? |
|
|
|
{{R from merge}} |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
The Misplaced Pages is not a place to advocate a title change in order to reflect recent scholarship. The articles themselves reflect recent scholarship but the titles should represent common usage. |
|
|
|
|
|
Names of articles should be the most commonly used name for the following reasons: |
|
|
* We want to maximize the likelihood of being listed in external search engines, thereby attracting more people to Misplaced Pages. For example, the pagename is ] and not "James Earl Carter, Jr."; the string "Jimmy Carter" in the page title make it easier to find: search engines will often give greater weight to the contents of the title than to the body of the page. Since "Jimmy Carter" is the most common form of the name, it will be searched on more often, and having that exact string in our page title will often mean our page shows up higher in other search engines. |
|
|
* We want to maximize the incidence that people who make a link guessing the article name, guess correctly; people guessing a different name may think there is no article yet, which may cause duplication. |
|
|
* Using a full formal name requires people to know that name, ''and'' to type more. |
|
|
|
|
|
Redirects help, but give a slightly ugly "redirected from" announcement at the top of the page. |
|
|
|
|
|
Examples of common names that should be used instead of formal names are: ], ] (not <nowiki>]</nowiki>), ], ] (not <nowiki>]</nowiki>), ], ]. Middle names should be avoided unless they are the most common form of a name (as in, say, ]). |
|
|
|
|
|
Initials in names should each be followed by a period and a space; for example: ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
== Use simple titles == |
|
|
|
|
|
Remember that a link is the title of the page it links to. |
|
|
Titles should be as simple as possible without being too general. |
|
|
For example, the page about ] should simply be called "Jazz", |
|
|
not "Jazz music", because "jazz" does not refer to anything other than music, and the simpler title makes linking easier. |
|
|
Adding the word "music" is redundant. |
|
|
On the other hand, country music should be on a page called ] because the word "country" has other referents besides the musical genre. If we ignore potential ambiguity, the ideal of simplicity can be at odds with the ideal of precision. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=== Subpages === |
|
|
|
|
|
A page with a slash (/) in its title is treated like any other page and there are no longer any special subpage features. So the use of subpage notation when naming pages is discouraged. Therefore, contributors have the burden of showing that a subpage is necessary, otherwise articles using a subpage will be moved to a main page. For example, use "]" or "James T. Kirk (Star Trek)", not "Star Trek/James T. Kirk", for an article on the fictional character Captain Kirk. Unnecessary subpages existing prior to this convention are in the process of being moved to their own main page. For discussions leading to the use of this convention see the ] page. |
|
|
|
|
|
== Junior, Senior == |
|
|
If the addition of "Senior" or "Junior" to a personal name is necessary, use "''', Sr.'''" or "''', Jr.'''" e.g use: |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*John Doe, Sr. |
|
|
instead of: |
|
|
*John Doe Sr |
|
|
*John Doe, Sr |
|
|
*John Doe Sr. |
|
|
*John Doe, Senior |
|
|
*John Doe Senior |
|
|
*John Doe, sen |
|
|
*John Doe, sen. |
|
|
*etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
== Don't overdo it == |
|
|
In cases where the common name of a subject is misleading (For example: |
|
|
"tidal wave" would be a misleading title since these phenomena have nothing to do with tides), |
|
|
then it is sometimes reasonable to fall back on a well-accepted alternative |
|
|
(], for example). Also, some terms are in common usage |
|
|
but are commonly regarded as offensive to large groups of people (Eskimo and Mormon Church, for example). In those cases use widely known |
|
|
alternatives (] and ]). When in doubt, check a mainstream reference work. |
|
|
|
|
|
This does not mean that we should avoid using widely known pseudonyms like |
|
|
], ], ], or widely known common names of |
|
|
]s and other things. But it does mean that we need to temper common |
|
|
usage when the commonly used term is unreasonably misleading or commonly regarded as offensive to |
|
|
one or more groups of people. |
|
|
] |
|