Misplaced Pages

SETI@home: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:36, 28 December 2007 editZahnrad (talk | contribs)718 edits Undid revision 180618213 by 216.41.123.210 (talk) Please contribute to the talk page discussion and explain your view← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:17, 3 November 2024 edit undoMaxeto0910 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users93,248 edits consistency throughout the articleTag: Visual edit 
(610 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|BOINC based volunteer computing project searching for signs of extraterrestrial intelligence}}
]
{{Multiple issues|
{{Original research|date=December 2023}}
{{More footnotes needed|date=December 2023}}
}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=July 2019}}
{{Infobox distributed computing project
| logo = SETI@home logo.png
| developer = ]
| released = {{start date |1999|05|17}}
| latest release version = SETI@home v8:8.00
| latest release date = {{start date and age|2015|12|30}}
SETI@home v8 for ] and ]/] ] Card:8.12/<br /> {{start date and age|2016|5|19}}<br />
AstroPulse v7:7.00/<br /> {{start date and age|2014|10|7}}<br />
AstroPulse v7 for nVidia and AMD/ATi GPU Card:7.10/<br /> {{start date and age|2015|4|23}}
| status = In hibernation
| goal = Discovery of radio evidence of ]
| funding = ] and private donations
| programming language =
| operating system = ], ], ], ], ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://boinc.berkeley.edu/projects.php|title=Choosing BOINC projects|website=boinc.berkeley.edu|access-date=January 3, 2023|archive-date=January 3, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180103072445/https://boinc.berkeley.edu/projects.php|url-status=live}}</ref><br />], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/DownloadOther|title=DownloadOther – BOINC|website=boinc.berkeley.edu|access-date=January 3, 2023|archive-date=January 3, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230103033124/https://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/DownloadOther|url-status=live}}</ref>
| platform = ]
| genre = ]
| license = ]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/sah_porting.php|title=Porting and optimizing SETI@home|website=setiathome.berkeley.edu|access-date=January 3, 2023|archive-date=January 3, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230103033126/https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/sah_porting.php|url-status=live}}</ref> <!-- or | licence = -->
| website = {{URL| https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/ }}
| active users = {{decrease}} 91,454 (March 2020)<ref name=bionicstats>{{cite web|title=Detailed stats – SETI@Home|url=http://boincstats.com/en/stats/0/project/detail/overview|website=BOINC stats|access-date=March 5, 2020|archive-date=January 4, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150104041228/http://boincstats.com/en/stats/0/project/detail/overview|url-status=live}}</ref>
| total users = {{increase}} 1,803,163 (March 2020)<ref name=bionicstats/>
| active hosts = 144,779 (March 2020)<ref name=bionicstats/>
| total hosts = 165,178 (March 2020)<ref name=bionicstats/>
|screenshot=SETI@home_custom_background_and_logo_screensaver.gif|screenshot_size=250px|screenshot caption=Screensaver with custom background}}


''' SETI@home''' ("SETI at home") is a project of the ] to analyze radio signals with the aim of ]. Until March 2020, it was run as an Internet-based public ] project that employed the ] software platform. It is hosted by the ] at the ], and is one of many activities undertaken as part of the worldwide ] effort.
''' SETI@home''' ("SETI at home") is a ] project using ]-connected computers, hosted by the ], at the ], in the ]. ''SETI'' is an acronym for the ]. SETI@home was released to the public on ], ].<ref>{{cite web

|url=http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/ast23may99_1.htm
SETI@home software was released to the public on May 17, 1999,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/ast23may99_1.htm |publisher=] |title=ET, phone SETI@home! |author=Tony Phillips |date=May 23, 1999 |access-date=6 October 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061001170505/http://science.nasa.gov//newhome/headlines/ast23may99_1.htm |archive-date=October 1, 2006 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite APOD |title=How to Search for Aliens |date=May 17, 1999 |access-date=6 October 2006}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/classic.php |title=SETI@home Classic: In Memoriam |date=December 15, 2005 |access-date=6 October 2006 |archive-date=March 8, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070308090420/http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/classic.php |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nettalklive.com/seti/ |title=Searches For ET! |work=Net Talk Live! |access-date=12 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000815053637/http://www.nettalklive.com/seti/ |archive-date=15 August 2000 }}</ref> making it the third large-scale use of ] over the Internet for research purposes, after ] (GIMPS) was launched in 1996 and ] in 1997. Along with ] and ], it is the third major computing project of this type that has the investigation of phenomena in interstellar space as its primary purpose.
|publisher=]

|title=ET, phone SETI@home!
In March 2020, the project stopped sending out new work to SETI@home users, bringing the crowdsourced computing aspect of the project to a stop.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Overbye|first=Dennis|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/23/science/seti-at-home-aliens.html|title=The Search for E.T. Goes on Hold, for Now|date=2020-03-23|work=The New York Times|access-date=2020-03-23|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331|archive-date=April 7, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200407093808/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/23/science/seti-at-home-aliens.html|url-status=live}}</ref> At the time, the team intended to shift focus onto the analysis and interpretation of the 20 years' worth of accumulated data. However, the team left open the possibility of eventually resuming volunteer computing using data from other radio telescopes, such as ] and ].<ref>{{Cite magazine|magazine=]|url=https://www.wired.com/story/setihome-is-over-but-the-search-for-alien-life-continues/|title=SETI@Home Is Over. But the Search for Alien Life Continues|access-date=February 27, 2021|first=Daniel|last=Oberhaus|date=2020-03-03|archive-date=February 28, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210228203800/https://www.wired.com/story/setihome-is-over-but-the-search-for-alien-life-continues/|url-status=live}}</ref>
|author= Dr. Tony Phillips

|date=May 23, 1999
As of November 2021, the science team has analysed the data and removed noisy signals (]) using the Nebula tool they developed and will choose the top-scoring 100 or so multiplets to be observed using the ], to which they have been granted 24 hours of observation time.<ref>{{Cite web|title=New zones, a milestone, and next steps|url=https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=85810#2088641|access-date=2021-11-27|website=setiathome.berkeley.edu|archive-date=November 27, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211127200350/https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=85810#2088641|url-status=live}}</ref>
|accessdate=2006-10-06
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap990517.html
|title= Astronomy Picture of the Day
|date=May 17, 1999
|author=Robert Nemiroff
|coauthors=Jerry Bonnell
|accessdate=2006-10-06
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url=http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/classic.php
|title=SETI@home Classic: In Memoriam
|date= December 15, 2005
|accessdate=2006-10-06
}}</ref>


==Scientific research== ==Scientific research==
The two original goals of SETI@home were:
There were two original goals of SETI@home. The first was to prove the viability and practicality of the 'distributed grid computing' concept, and the second was to do useful scientific work by supporting an observational analysis to detect intelligent life outside Earth.
* to do useful scientific work by supporting an observational analysis to detect intelligent life outside ]<ref name="acmanderson">{{Cite journal |last1=Anderson |first1=David P. |last2=Cobb |first2=Jeff |last3=Korpela |first3=Eric |last4=Lebofsky |first4=Matt |last5=Werthimer |first5=Dan |date=November 2002 |title=SETI@home: an experiment in public-resource computing |url=https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/581571.581573 |journal=Communications of the ACM |language=en |volume=45 |issue=11 |pages=56–61 |doi=10.1145/581571.581573 |s2cid=15439521 |issn=0001-0782 |access-date=September 19, 2022 |archive-date=September 20, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220920172330/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/581571.581573 |url-status=live }}</ref>
* to prove the viability and practicality of the "volunteer computing" concept<ref>{{Cite web |title=S.E.T.I. - 100000 pr |url=https://sites.google.com/site/scoemiche/s-e-t-i |access-date=2022-09-19 |website=sites.google.com |archive-date=September 20, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220920171704/https://sites.google.com/site/scoemiche/s-e-t-i |url-status=live }}</ref>


The first of these goals is generally considered to have succeeded completely. The current ] environment, a development of the original SETI@home, is providing support for several computationally intensive projects in a wide range of disciplines. The second of these goals is considered to have succeeded completely. The current ] environment, a development of the original SETI@home, is providing support for many computationally intensive projects in a wide range of disciplines.


The second of these goals has failed to date: no evidence for ETI signals has been shown via SETI@home. However, ongoing continuation is predicated on the assumption that the observational analysis is not an 'ill-posed' one. The remainder of this article deals specifically with the original SETI@home observations/analysis. The first of these goals has to date yielded no conclusive results: no evidence for ETI signals has been shown via SETI@home. However, the ongoing continuation is predicated on the assumption that the observational analysis is not "ill-posed." The remainder of this article deals specifically with the original SETI@home observations/analysis. The vast majority of the sky (over 98%) has yet to be surveyed, and each point in the sky must be surveyed many times to exclude even a subset of possibilities.


==Procedure details==
SETI@home searches for possible evidence of ] transmissions from ] using observational data from the ]. The data is taken 'piggyback' or 'passively' while the telescope is used for other scientific programs. The data is digitized, stored, and sent to the SETI@home facility. The data is then parsed into small chunks in frequency and time, and analyzed, using software, to search for any signals--that is, variations which cannot be ascribed to noise, and contain information. The crux of SETI@home is to have each chunk of data, from the millions of chunks resulting,analyzed off-site by home computers, and then have the software results reported back. Thus what appears an onerous problem in data analysis is reduced to a reasonable one by aid from a large, internet-based community.
SETI@home searches for possible evidence of radio transmissions from ] using observational data from the ] and the ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://seti.berkeley.edu/listen/research.html|title=Berkeley SETI|website=seti.berkeley.edu|access-date=10 June 2017|archive-date=July 31, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180731153757/https://seti.berkeley.edu/listen/research.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The data is taken "piggyback" or "passively" while the telescope is used for other scientific programs. The data is digitized, stored, and sent to the SETI@home facility. The data is then parsed into small chunks in frequency and time, and analyzed, using software, to search for any signals—that is, variations which cannot be ascribed to noise, and hence contain information. Using volunteer computing, SETI@home sends the millions of chunks of data to be analyzed off-site by home computers, and then have those computers report the results. Thus what appears a difficult problem in data analysis is reduced to a reasonable one by aid from a large, Internet-based community of borrowed computer resources.


The software searches for five types of signals that distinguish them from ]:<ref>{{cite web |url=http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/about_seti/about_seti_at_home_4.html |title=How SETI@Home Works – What is SETI@home Looking For? |publisher=SETI@Home Classic |access-date=23 June 2010 |archive-date=September 9, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190909020950/http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/about_seti/about_seti_at_home_4.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
The software searches for four types of signals that distinguish them from noise: ]:{{Fact|date=February 2007}}
*Spikes in ] * Spikes in ]
*] rises and falls in transmission power, possibly representing the telescope beam's ] passing over a radio source * ] rises and falls in transmission power, possibly representing the telescope beam's ] passing over a radio source
*Triplets &mdash; three power spikes in a row * Triplets&nbsp; three power spikes in a row
*] signals that possibly represent a ] digital-style transmission * ] signals that possibly represent a ] digital-style transmission
* ] detects signal waveforms.


There are many variations on how an ETI signal may be affected by the interstellar medium, and by relative motion of it's origin compared to Earth. The potential 'signal' is thus processed in a number of ways (although not testing all detection methods nor scenarios) to ensure the highest likelihood of distinguishing it from the scientillating noise already present in all directions of outer space. For instance, another planet is very likely to be moving at a speed and acceleration with respect to Earth, and that will shift the frequency, over time, of the potential 'signal'. Checking for this through processing is done, to an extent, in the SETI@home software. There are many variations on how an ETI signal may be affected by the interstellar medium, and by the relative motion of its origin compared to Earth. The potential "signal" is thus processed in many ways (although not testing all detection methods nor scenarios) to ensure the highest likelihood of distinguishing it from the scintillating noise already present in all directions of outer space. For instance, another planet is very likely to be moving at a speed and acceleration with respect to Earth, and that will shift the frequency, over time, of the potential "signal." Checking for this through processing is done, to an extent, in the SETI@home software.


The process is somewhat like tuning a ] to various ], and looking at the signal strength meter. If the strength of the signal goes up, that gets attention. More technically, it involves a lot of digital signal processing, mostly ]s at various ] rates and durations. The process is somewhat like tuning a radio to various ], and looking at the signal strength meter. If the strength of the signal goes up, that gets attention. More technically, it involves a lot of digital signal processing, mostly ]s at various ] rates and durations.


===Results=== ==Results==
While the project has not detected any ETI signals (see ]), it has identified several candidate targets (sky positions), where the spike in intensity is not easily explained as noisespots<ref> at the Classic Seti@home website</ref> for further analysis. The most significant candidate signal to date was announced on ], ], named ]. To date, the project has not confirmed the detection of any ] signals. However, it has identified several candidate targets (sky positions), where the spike in intensity is not easily explained as noise spots,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/candidates.html |title=Signal Candidate |publisher=Classic SETI@home |access-date=23 June 2010 |archive-date=September 1, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070901054148/http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/candidates.html |url-status=live }}</ref> for further analysis. The most significant candidate signal to date was announced on September 1, 2004, named ].


While the project has not reached the stated primary goal of finding extraterrestrial intelligence, it has proved to the scientific community that volunteer computing projects using Internet-connected computers can succeed as a viable analysis tool, and even beat the largest supercomputers.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://boincstats.com/en/stats/-1/project/detail |publisher=BOINCstats |title=BOINC combined – Credit overview |access-date=23 June 2010 |archive-date=January 22, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130122022019/http://boincstats.com/en/stats/-1/project/detail/ |url-status=live }}</ref>{{Failed verification|date=March 2020}} However, it has not been demonstrated that the order of magnitude excess in computers used, many outside the home (the original intent was to use 50,000–100,000 "home" computers),<ref name="Sullivan">{{cite web |url=http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/woody_paper.html |title=Sullivan, et al.: Seti@Home |publisher=Seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu |access-date=17 May 2009 |archive-date=December 21, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081221172659/http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/woody_paper.html |url-status=live }}</ref> has benefited the project scientifically. (For more on this, see {{section link||Challenges}} below.)
Astronomer ] (2004), has stated that he expects to get a conclusive signal and proof of alien contact between ] and ], based on the ]. This implies that a prolonged effort may benefit SETI@home, despite its (present) nearly ten year run without success in ETI detection.


] ] stated in 2004 that he expects to get a conclusive signal and proof of alien contact between 2020 and 2025, based on the ].<ref>{{cite news | work = Space Daily | title = First Contact Within 20 Years: Shostak | url = http://www.spacedaily.com/news/seti-04e.html | date = July 22, 2004 | last = Shostak | first = Seth | author-link = Seth Shostak | access-date = 12 June 2006 | archive-date = June 29, 2006 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060629082041/http://www.spacedaily.com/news/seti-04e.html | url-status = live }}</ref> This implies that a prolonged effort may benefit SETI@home, despite its (present) twenty-year run without success in ETI detection.
While the project hasn't reached the goal of finding extraterrestrial intelligence, it has proved to the scientific community that distributed computing projects using Internet-connected computers can succeed as a valuable analysis tool,and even beat the largest supercomputers.<ref>http://www.boincstats.com/stats/project_graph.php?pr=bo</ref>. However, the original intent was to use 50,000-100,000 "home" computers: it has not been demonstrated that the order of magnitude excess in computers used--many outside of the 'home'-- has benefitted the project scientifically (see 'threats to project').{{Fact|date=December 2007}}


==Technology== ==Technology==
Anybody with an at least intermittently Internet-connected computer was able to participate in SETI@home by running a free program that downloaded and analyzed ] data.
]
Anybody with an Internet-active computer can participate in SETI@home by running a free program that downloads and analyzes ] data.


Observational ] is recorded on 36 ] tapes at the ] in ], each holding 15.5 hours of observations, which are then mailed to ] (Korpela et al. 2001). ] does not have a high ] internet connection, so data must go by ] to Berkeley at first. Once there, it is divided in both ] and ]s ''work units'' of 107 seconds of data (SETI@home 2001), or approximately 0.35 MB, which overlap in time but not in frequency (Korpela et al. 2001). These work units then get sent from the SETI@home ] over the ] to people around the world to analyze. Observational data were recorded on 2-] ] hard disk drives fed from the ] in Puerto Rico, each holding about 2.5 days of observations, which were then sent to ].<ref name="Korpela">{{cite journal | title = SETI@home&nbsp;– Massively Distributed Computing for SETI | first = Eric | last = Korpela | author2 = Dan Werthimer | author3 = David Anderson | author4 = Jeff Cobb | author5 = Matt Lebofsky | journal = Computing in Science & Engineering | date = January 2001 | pages = 78–83 | url = http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/~korpela/papers/CISE.pdf | doi = 10.1109/5992.895191 | volume = 3 | issue = 1 | bibcode = 2001CSE.....3a..78K | access-date = October 25, 2005 | archive-date = October 23, 2014 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141023225217/http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/~korpela/papers/CISE.pdf }}</ref> Arecibo does not have a broadband ], so data must go by ] to Berkeley.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/about_seti/about_seti_at_home_2.html |title=About SETI@home page 2 |publisher=Seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu |access-date=17 May 2009 |archive-date=March 10, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200310022312/http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/about_seti/about_seti_at_home_2.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Once there, it is divided in both ] and ]s ''work units'' of 107 seconds of data,<ref>{{cite web | title = The SETI@home Sky Survey | url = http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/sciencepaper.html | author = SETI@home | date = 2001<!-- no valid last modified available --> | access-date = 2 June 2006 | archive-date = April 22, 2020 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200422000741/http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/sciencepaper.html | url-status = live }}</ref> or approximately 0.35 ] (350 ] or 350,000 ]), which overlap in time but not in frequency.<ref name="Korpela"/> These work units are then sent from the SETI@home ] over the Internet to personal computers around the world to analyze.


Data was merged into a ] using SETI@home computers in Berkeley. ] was rejected, and various pattern-detection algorithms were applied to search for the most interesting signals.
The analysis software can search for signals with about one-tenth the strength of those sought in previous surveys, because it makes use of a computationally intensive ] called '']''<!-- this is really not true - see the talk page - need to fix--> that no one else has had the computing power to implement.


The project used ] for ] processing starting in 2015.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/apps.php|title=Applications|access-date=July 5, 2019|archive-date=October 5, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221005061217/https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/apps.php|url-status=live}}</ref>
Data is merged into a ] using SETI@home computers in Berkeley. ] is rejected, and various pattern-detection algorithms are applied to search for the most interesting signals.

In 2016 SETI@home began processing data from the ] project.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://breakthroughinitiatives.org/news/3|title=Breakthrough Initiatives|website=breakthroughinitiatives.org|access-date=31 May 2019|archive-date=May 31, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190531153829/https://breakthroughinitiatives.org/news/3|url-status=live}}</ref>


===Software=== ===Software===
] Manager working on the SETI@home project (v 7.6.22)]]
]
]
<!--Generally needs to go much deeper about how the software works internally rather than how it appears to a non-technical participant. Maybe put this in how it section and make this a history section?--> <!--Generally needs to go much deeper about how the software works internally rather than how it appears to a non-technical participant. Maybe put this in how it section and make this a history section?-->


The SETI@home distributed computing ] runs either as a ] or continuously while a user works, making use of processor power that would otherwise be unused. The SETI@home volunteer computing software ran either as a ] or continuously while a user worked, making use of processor time that would otherwise be unused.


The initial software platform, now referred to as "SETI@home Classic", ran from ] ] to ] ]. This program was only capable of running SETI@home; it was replaced by ] (BOINC), which also allows users to contribute to other distributed computing projects at the same time as running SETI@home. The BOINC platform will also allow testing for more types of signals. The initial software platform, now referred to as "SETI@home Classic", ran from May 17, 1999, to December 15, 2005. This program was only capable of running SETI@home; it was replaced by ] (BOINC), which also allows users to contribute to other volunteer computing projects at the same time as running SETI@home. The BOINC platform also allowed testing for more types of signals.


The discontinuation of the SETI@home Classic platform has rendered older ] computers running pre-OS X versions of the ] unsuitable for participating in the project. The discontinuation of the SETI@home Classic platform rendered older ] computers running the ] (pre December, 2001) unsuitable for participating in the project.


SETI@home was available for the Sony ] console.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dotsch.de/boinc/SETI@home%20applications.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080108193313/http://www.dotsch.de/boinc/SETI%40home%20applications.html|archive-date=2008-01-08|title=SETI@home applications}}</ref>
On ] ] new work units for a new version of SETI@home called "SETI@home Enhanced" started being distributed. Computers provide the power for even more computationally intensive work than when the project began. This new version is more sensitive by a factor of two with respect to Gaussian signals and to some kinds of pulsed signals than the original SETI@home (BOINC) software. This new application has been optimized to the point where it will run faster on some workunits than earlier versions. However, some workunits (the best workunits, scientifically speaking) will take significantly longer.


On May 3, 2006, new work units for a new version of SETI@home called "SETI@home Enhanced" started distribution. Since computers had the power for more computationally intensive work than when the project began, this new version was more sensitive by a factor of two concerning Gaussian signals and to some kinds of pulsed signals than the original SETI@home (BOINC) software. This new application had been optimized to the point where it would run faster on some work units than earlier versions. However, some work units (the best work units, scientifically speaking) would take significantly longer.
Notably, there have also been some distributions of the SETI@home applications that have been optimized for a particular type of CPU. They are referred to as "optimized executables" and have been found to run faster on systems specific for that CPU. As of 2007, most of these applications are optimized for ] processors (and their corresponding instruction sets). <ref>http://lunatics.at/index.php</ref>


In addition, some distributions of the SETI@home applications were optimized for a particular type of ]. They were referred to as "optimized executables", and had been found to run faster on systems specific for that CPU. {{As of|2007}}, most of these applications were optimized for ] processors and their corresponding ]s.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://lunatics.kwsn.net |title=Seti@Home optimized science apps and information |publisher=Lunatics.kwsn.net |access-date=17 May 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090424210331/http://lunatics.kwsn.net/ |archive-date=April 24, 2009 }}</ref>
SETI@home has also been used as a ] tool for ] workstations, as it runs the computer ] at full power for a sustained time period. This is especially useful to ].


The results of the data processing are normally automatically transmitted when the computer is next connected to the internet; it can also be instructed to connect to the internet as needed. The results of the data processing were normally automatically transmitted when the computer was next connected to the Internet; it could also be instructed to connect to the Internet as needed.


==Statistics== ==Statistics==
With over 5.2 million participants worldwide, the project is the distributed computing project with the most participants to date. Contrast this to the original intent of SETI@home, which was to utilize 50,000-100,000 home computers. Since its launch on ], ], the project has logged over two million years of aggregate computing time. On ], ], SETI@home had performed a total of 10<sup>21</sup> ] operations. It is acknowledged by the '']'' as the largest computation in history (Newport 2005). With over 1.6 million computers in the system, as of ] ], SETI@home has the ability to compute over 355 ] . For comparison, ] (currently the world's ] ]) peaks at just over 360 TFLOPS with sustained rate of 280 TFLOPS. With over 5.2&nbsp;million participants worldwide, the project was the volunteer computing project with the most participants to date{{when|date=March 2014}}. The original intent of SETI@home was to utilize 50,000–100,000 home computers.<ref name="Sullivan" /> Since its launch on May 17, 1999, the project has logged over two million years of aggregate computing time.{{as of?|date=May 2012}} On September 26, 2001, SETI@home had performed a total of 10<sup>21</sup> ] operations. It was acknowledged by the 2008 edition of the '']'' as the largest computation in history.<ref>{{cite web | title = Largest Computation | url = http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/index.asp?id=53519 | work = Guinness World Records | editor = Newport, Stuart | date = 2005<!-- no valid last modified available --> | publisher = HCI Entertainment | access-date = 3 December 2005 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20051128165405/http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/index.asp?id=53519 <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = November 28, 2005}}</ref> With over 145,000 active computers in the system (1.4&nbsp;million total) in 233 countries, {{As of|2013|06|23|lc=on}}, SETI@home had the ability to compute over 668 ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://boincstats.com/en/stats/0/project/detail |title=SETI@Home Project |publisher=BOINC Stats |access-date=23 June 2013 |archive-date=July 3, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130703143037/http://boincstats.com/en/stats/0/project/detail |url-status=live }}</ref> For comparison, the ] computer, which {{As of|2013|06|23|lc=on}} was the world's ] ], was able to compute 33.86 ] (approximately 50 times greater).


== Project future == ==Project future==
There were future plans to get data from the ] in ] to analyse the southern hemisphere.<ref> in the "Future directions of SETI@home" page on the Classic Seti@home website</ref> However, these plans seem to have been discarded, since they aren't mentioned in the project's website. Other plans include SETI@home Enhanced (an application with increased sensitivity), a Multi-Beam Data Recorder, a Near Time Persistency Checker and Astropulse (an application that uses coherent dedispersion to search for pulsed signals).<ref> at the SETI@home website</ref> There were plans to get data from the ] in Australia to analyze the southern hemisphere.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/setifuture.html#southern |title=Southern Hemisphere Search increasing SETI@home's sky coverage in the "Future directions of SETI@home" |publisher=Classic SETI@home website |access-date=23 June 2010 |archive-date=February 19, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070219101606/http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/setifuture.html#southern |url-status=live }}</ref> However, {{As of|2018|06|03|lc=on}}, these plans were not mentioned in the project's website. Other plans include a Multi-Beam Data Recorder, a Near Time Persistency Checker and ] (an application that uses coherent dedispersion to search for pulsed signals).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/sah_plans.php |title=SETI@home Plans |publisher=SETI@home |access-date=23 June 2010 |archive-date=October 11, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071011025755/http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/sah_plans.php |url-status=live }}</ref> Astropulse will team with the original SETI@home to detect other sources, such as rapidly rotating pulsars, exploding primordial black holes, or as-yet unknown astrophysical phenomena.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/ap_faq.php |title=Astropulse FAQ |publisher=Setiathome.berkeley.edu |access-date=17 May 2009 |archive-date=April 29, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090429072028/http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/ap_faq.php |url-status=live }}</ref> Beta testing of the final public release version of Astropulse was completed in July 2008, and the distribution of work units to higher spec machines capable of processing the more CPU intensive work units started in mid-July 2008.


On March 31, 2020, UC Berkeley stopped sending out new data for SETI@Home clients to process, ending the effort for the time being. The program stated they were at a point of "diminishing returns" with the volunteer processing and needed to put the effort into hibernation while they processed the results.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.engadget.com/2020/03/04/seti-home-stops-for-now/ | title = SETI@Home ends its crowdsourced search for alien life after 21 years | first = Daniel | last = Cooper | date = March 4, 2020 | access-date = March 4, 2020 | work = ] | archive-date = March 5, 2020 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200305051713/https://www.engadget.com/2020/03/04/seti-home-stops-for-now/ | url-status = live }}</ref>
== Competitive aspect==
SETI@home users quickly started to compete with one another in an effort to process the maximum number of work units. Teams were formed to combine the efforts of individual users. The competition continued, and grew larger, with the introduction of BOINC.


==Competitive aspect==
As with any competition, attempts have been made to 'cheat' the system and claim credit for work that has not been performed. To combat cheats, the SETI@Home system sends every workunit to multiple computers, a value known as "initial replication" (currently '''3'''). Credit is only granted for each returned workunit once a minimum number of results have been returned and the results agree, a value known as "minimum quorum" (currently '''2'''). If, due to computation errors or cheating by submitting false data, not enough results agree, more identical workunits are sent out until the minimum quorum can be reached. The final credit granted to all machines which returned the correct result is the same, and is the lowest of the values claimed by each machine. The claimed credit by each machine for an identical workunit often varies due to very minor differences in floating point arithmetic on different processors.{{Fact|date=February 2007}}
SETI@home users quickly started to compete with one another to process the maximum number of work units. Teams were formed to combine the efforts of individual users. The competition continued and grew larger with the introduction of BOINC.


As with any competition, attempts have been made to "cheat" the system and claim credit for work that has not been performed. To combat cheats, the SETI@home system sends every work unit to multiple computers, a value known as "initial replication" (currently '''2'''). Credit is only granted for each returned work unit once a minimum number of results have been returned and the results agree, a value known as "minimum quorum" (currently '''2'''). If, due to computation errors or cheating by submitting false data, not enough results agree, more identical work units are sent out until the minimum quorum can be reached. The final credit granted to all machines which returned the correct result is the same and is the lowest of the values claimed by each machine.
Some users have installed and run SETI@home on computers at their workplaces &mdash; an act known as
'Borging', after the assimilation-driven ] of '']''. In some cases, SETI@home users have misused company resources to gain work-unit results &mdash; with at least one individual getting fired for running SETI@home on an enterprise production system (Foreman 2004). <!-- First firing was much earlier, but needs citation finding before one can use that information-->


Some users have installed and run SETI@home on computers at their workplaces; an act known as "Borging", after the assimilation-driven ] of '']''. In some cases, SETI@home users have misused company resources to gain work-unit results with at least two individuals getting fired for running SETI@home on an enterprise production system.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1782050.stm |title=BBC 2002 |work=BBC News |date=January 28, 2002 |access-date=17 May 2009 |archive-date=January 7, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090107085414/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1782050.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> <!-- The first firing was much earlier, but needs citation finding before one can use that information-->There is a thread in the newsgroup alt.sci.seti which bears the title "Anyone fired for SETI screensaver"<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://groups.google.com/g/alt.sci.seti/c/0ksE8kN4wJI|title=Anyone fired for SETI screensaver|website=groups.google.com|access-date=June 6, 2022|archive-date=June 6, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220606023940/https://groups.google.com/g/alt.sci.seti/c/0ksE8kN4wJI|url-status=live}}</ref> and ran starting as early as September 14, 1999.
Other users collected large quantities of equipment together at home to create "SETI farms", which typically consist of a number of computers consisting of only a ], ], ] and ] that are arranged on shelves as diskless ] running either ] or old versions of Windows "headless" (without a monitor).


Other users collect large quantities of equipment together at home to create "SETI farms", which typically consist of a number of computers consisting of only a ], ], ] and ] that are arranged on shelves as diskless ] running either ] or old versions of ] "headless" (without a monitor).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://bhs.broo.k12.wv.us/homepage/staff/seti/farms.htm |title=SETI Stack and farm systems |publisher=Bhs.broo.k12.wv.us |access-date=14 July 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090131122519/http://bhs.broo.k12.wv.us/homepage/staff/seti/farms.htm |archive-date=January 31, 2009 }}</ref>
==Threats to the project==


==Challenges==
Like any project of prolonged duration, there are factors that may result in its termination. Some of these are detailed below:


===Potential Closure of Arecibo Observatory=== ===Closure of Arecibo Observatory===


At present, SETI@home procures its data from the ] facility, operated by the National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center, administered by Cornell University. The decreasing operating budget for the observatory has created a shortfall of funds, that have not been made up from other sources, such as private donors, NASA, other foreign research institution, nor private non-profit organizations, such as SETI@home. Until 2020, SETI@home procured its data from the ] facility that was operated by the National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center and administered by ].


The decreasing operating budget for the observatory has created a shortfall of funds which has not been made up from other sources such as private donors, ], other foreign research institutions, nor private non-profit organizations such as SETI@home.
The National Science Foundation has made it clear the Arecibo will close in 2011 without such funds, and therefore the present data stream for SETI@home would cease in that situation.


However, in the overall long-term views held by many involved with the SETI project, any usable radio telescope could take over from Arecibo (which completely collapsed in December 2020),<ref name="guardian collapsed">{{cite news|date=1 December 2020|title=Giant Arecibo radio telescope collapses in Puerto Rico|work=]|agency=]|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/01/arecibo-radio-telescope-collapses-puerto-rico|access-date=1 December 2020|archive-date=December 5, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201205135942/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/01/arecibo-radio-telescope-collapses-puerto-rico|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="APNews1Dec2020">{{cite news |last1=Coto |first1=Danica |title=Huge Puerto Rico radio telescope, already damaged, collapses |url=https://apnews.com/article/technology-arecibo-observatory-puerto-rico-science--0da6abb251f455977bf0c752348e712e |access-date=5 December 2020 |work=AP NEWS |date=1 December 2020 |archive-date=April 22, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210422013836/https://apnews.com/article/technology-arecibo-observatory-puerto-rico-science--0da6abb251f455977bf0c752348e712e |url-status=live }}</ref> as all the SETI systems are portable and relocatable.
===Greenhouse Gases and the Billion Dollar Computation{{or|date=December 2007}}===

Although SETI@home promulgated itself as a mindful use of (otherwise) free PC clock cycles, the program(s) run(s) at a cost of $0.50- $1.50 per day per user--for electricity, and so on]. In ten-plus years(from the first alpha tests), and millions of runs per year (see 'Statistics', i.e. 'aggregated..time 2 million years'), this had cost more than $500,000,000 USD in equivalent energy costs. It is likely that SETI@home will cost more than $1 billion USD in a few years in real energy.

These costs have exceeded total funds spent on all other SETI projects, and the integrated toll, from electricity generation of carbon emissions (greenhouse gases)] has approached that produced by a moderate-sized city in a year. When analyzed in this context, SETI@home could be viewed as a project with a very real cost both in terms of funds and in greenhouse emissions due to the electricity usage required by its many nodes.

===Alternative distributed computing projects===
When the project was launched there were few alternative ways of donating computer time to research projects. However, now there are a lot more options, and therefore SETI@home has to compete with other projects. As different people have different value systems, some will (for example) prefer projects with a relatively high chance of benefitting humanity in the short term, while others will avoid these because they are more likely to be associated with commercial profit. Yet there are now nonprofit organizations working for these humanitarian goals, such as the ], which likewise has teams and a points system, yet focuses not-for-profit research that is deemed to be in the interest of the public good, such as ] research, proteome folding, flaviviridae anti-virus research (Yellow Fever, West Nile Virus, Hepatitis C and Dengue Fever) and South African Climate Prediction.


===More restrictive computer use policies in businesses=== ===More restrictive computer use policies in businesses===
In one documented case, an individual was fired for explicitly importing and using the SETI@home software on computers used for the U.S. state of Ohio.<ref>{{cite web |date=October 9, 2004 |author=John Adams |url=http://www.oreillynet.com/databases/blog/2004/10/knock_down_then_kick.html |title=Knock Down, Then Kick – O'Reilly Databases |publisher=Oreillynet.com |access-date=17 May 2009 |archive-date=May 13, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130513035117/http://www.oreillynet.com/databases/blog/2004/10/knock_down_then_kick.html |url-status=live }}</ref> In another incident a school IT director resigned after his installation allegedly cost his school district $1&nbsp;million in removal costs; however, other reasons for this firing included lack of communication with his superiors, not installing ] software and alleged theft of computer equipment,<ref>{{cite news |title=Higley firing tied to alien-search software |date=November 30, 2009 |newspaper=The Arizona Republic |url=http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2009/11/30/20091130searchforaliens1202.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100407055848/http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2009/11/30/20091130searchforaliens1202.html |archive-date=April 7, 2010 |url-status=dead}}</ref> leading a ] editor to comment that "the volunteer computing nonsense was simply the best and most obvious excuse the district had to terminate his contract ]".<ref>{{cite news |author=Christopher Dawson |url=http://www.zdnet.com/blog/education/admin-fired-for-incompetence-not-alien-search/3408 |title=Admin fired for incompetence, not alien search |work=ZDNet |date=December 2, 2009 |access-date=20 November 2013 |archive-date=May 11, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100511193644/http://www.zdnet.com/blog/education/admin-fired-for-incompetence-not-alien-search/3408 |url-status=dead }}</ref>


{{As of|2005|10|16}}, approximately one-third of the processing for the non-BOINC version of the software was performed on work or school based machines.<ref>{{cite web | author = SETI@home | year = 2005 | url = http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/venues.html | title = SETI@home computer venues | access-date = 12 June 2006 | archive-date = July 3, 2008 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080703160840/http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/venues.html | url-status = live }}</ref> As many of these computers will give reduced privileges to ordinary users, it is possible that much of this has been done by ]s.
In at least one documented case, an individual was fired for explicitly importing and using the SETI@home software on computers used for the State of Ohio]
signalling that such non-essential use of SETI@home--outside of the 'home'--can have serious negative consequences.


To some extent, this may be offset by ] and ] of home computers,{{Citation needed|date=December 2007}} especially those with ]s,<ref name="SETI_GPU">{{Cite web
As of ] ], approximately one third of the processing for the non-BOINC version of the software was performed on work or school based machines (SETI@home, 2005). As a lot of these computers will give reduced privileges to ordinary users, it is possible that much of this has been done by ]s themselves.
|url=http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=73935

|title=SETI@home now supports Intel GPUs
To some extent, this may be offset by better connectivity to home machines.
|date=January 29, 2014
|access-date=February 19, 2015
|archive-date=February 20, 2015
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150220063011/http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=73935
|url-status=live
}}</ref> which have also benefited other volunteer computing projects such as ].<ref>{{cite web
| url = https://www.engadget.com/2006/09/29/stanford-university-tailors-folding-home-to-gpus/
| title = Stanford University tailors Folding@home to GPUs
| author = Darren Murph
| date = September 29, 2006
| access-date = February 19, 2015
| archive-date = October 12, 2007
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071012000648/http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/29/stanford-university-tailors-folding-home-to-gpus/
| url-status = live
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
| url = http://graphics.stanford.edu/~mhouston/
| title = Folding@Home – GPGPU
| author = Mike Houston
| access-date = February 19, 2015
| archive-date = October 27, 2007
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071027130116/http://graphics.stanford.edu/~mhouston/
| url-status = live
}}</ref> The spread of ] devices provides another large resource for volunteer computing. For example, in 2012, Piotr Luszczek (a former doctoral student of ]) presented results showing that an ] matched the historical performance of a ] (the fastest computer in the world in 1985) on an embedded ] benchmark.<ref name="iPad2_Cray2">{{Cite web
|url=https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTE4NjU
|title=Apple iPad 2 As Fast As The Cray-2 Super Computer
|first=Michael
|last=Larabel
|date=September 16, 2012
|access-date=February 19, 2015
|archive-date=February 20, 2015
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150220054659/http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTE4NjU
|url-status=live
}}</ref>


===Funding=== ===Funding===
There is currently no government ] for SETI research, and private funding is always limited. Berkeley Space Science Lab has found ways of working with small budgets and the project has received donations allowing it to go well beyond its original planned duration, but it still has to compete for limited funds with other SETI projects and other space sciences projects. There is currently no government ] for SETI research, and private funding is always limited. Berkeley Space Science Lab has found ways of working with small budgets, and the project has received donations allowing it to go well beyond its original planned duration, but it still has to compete for limited funds with other SETI projects and other space sciences projects.


In a December 16, 2007 plea for donations, SETI@home stated its present modest state and urged donations for $476,000 needed for continuation into 2008. In a December 16, 2007 plea for donations, SETI@home stated its present modest state and urged donations of $476,000 needed for continuation into 2008.


===Unofficial clients=== ===Unofficial clients===
A number of individuals and companies made unofficial changes to the distributed part of the software to try to produce faster results, but this compromised the integrity of all the results.<ref>{{cite journal | title = The SETI@Home Problem | journal = Crossroads |year = 2000 | first = David | last = Molnar | volume = 7 | issue = 1| url = http://oldwww.acm.org/crossroads/xrds7-1/september2000.html | archive-url = https://archive.today/20120715134754/http://oldwww.acm.org/crossroads/xrds7-1/september2000.html | archive-date = 15 July 2012 | access-date = 30 January 2011}}</ref> As a result, the software had to be updated to make it easier to detect such changes, and discover unreliable clients. BOINC will run on unofficial clients; however, clients that return different and therefore incorrect data are not allowed, so corrupting the result database is avoided. BOINC relies on cross-checking to validate data<ref>{{cite web |url=http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/SecurityIssues |title=SecurityIssues – BOINC – Trac |publisher=Boinc.berkeley.edu |access-date=17 May 2009 |archive-date=June 5, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110605024001/http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/SecurityIssues |url-status=live }}</ref> but unreliable clients need to be identified, to avoid situations when two of these report the same invalid data and therefore corrupt the database. A very popular unofficial client (lunatic) allows users to take advantage of the special features provided by their processor(s) such as ], ], ], ], ].1, and ] to allow for faster processing.
A number of individuals and companies made unofficial changes to the distributed part of the software to try to produce faster results, but this compromised the integrity of all the results (Molnar 2000). As a result, the software had to be updated to make it easier to detect such changes.

BOINC allows unofficial clients and relies more on cross-checking. <ref>http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/SecurityIssues</ref>


===Hardware and database failures===
==Other distributed computing projects==
{{original research|date=February 2023|part=section|reason=The section appears to be original research elaboration upon the passing mention of "The sources of failure, both hardware and software,seemed limitless." in <ref name="acmanderson" />.}}
{{See|List of distributed computing projects}}
SETI@home is a test bed for further development not only of BOINC but of other hardware and software (database) technology. Under SETI@home processing loads, these experimental technologies can be more challenging than expected, as SETI databases do not have typical accounting and business data or relational structures. The non-traditional database uses often do incur greater processing overheads and risk of database corruption and outright database failure. Hardware, software and database failures can (and do) cause dips in project participation.
Distributed computing is also being used for medical research, such as to searching for ] treatments and in ] projects. Since the switch to the BOINC platform however, users can divide work between projects, choosing to give only a percentage of CPU time to each.


The project has had to shut down several times to change over to new databases capable of handling more massive datasets. Hardware failure has proven to be a substantial source of project shutdowns, as hardware failure is often coupled with database corruption.
However there are a few services which allow the user to manage all of his or her projects and computers running BOINC in one place, such as .


==See also== ==See also==
{{div col}}
*]
*] *]
*]
*] *]
*] *]
*] *]
*] *]
*]
*] *]
*]
*]
*] *]
*]
{{div col end}}


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}
*{{cite journal | title = The Ultimate Hacker: SETI Signals May Need to Be Decontaminated | first = Richard A., Jr. | last = Carrigan | year = 2003 | journal = Astronomical Society of the Pacfic | pages = 519}}
*{{cite news | author = Foreman, Liz | publisher = Associated Press | url = http://www.wcpo.com/news/2004/local/10/08/seti.html | title = State Employee Fired For Using State Property To Search For Aliens | date = ]}}
*{{cite journal | title = SETI@home - Massively Distributed Computing for SETI | first = Eric | last = Korpela | coauthors = Dan Werthimer, David Anderson, Jeff Cobb and Matt Lebofsky | journal = Computing in Science & Engineering | month = January | year = 2001 | pages = 78-83 | url=http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/~korpela/papers/CISE.pdf}}
*{{cite web | title = The SETI@Home Problem | url = http://www.acm.org/crossroads/columns/onpatrol/september2000.html | author = Molnar, David | year = 2000 | accessdate = 2006-06-02}}
*{{cite web | title = Largest Computation | url = http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/index.asp?id=53519 | work = Guinness World Records | author = Newport, Stuart (editor) | year = 2005 <!-- no valid last modified available --> | publisher = HCI Entertainment | accessdate = 2005-12-03}}
*{{cite web | title = Scientists be on guard... | url = http://technology.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,16559,1650296,00.html | work=Guinness World Records | author = Sample, Ian | year=2005<!-- no valid last modified available --> | publisher = The Guardian |
accessdate = 2005-11-25}}
*{{cite news | publisher = Space Daily | title = First Contact Within 20 Years: Shostak | url = http://www.spacedaily.com/news/seti-04e.html | date = ] | last = Shostak | first = Seth | authorlink = Seth Shostak | accessdate = 2006-06-12}}
*{{cite web | title = The SETI@home Sky Survey | url = http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/sciencepaper.html | author = SETI@home | year=2001<!-- no valid last modified available --> |
accessdate = 2006-06-02}}
*{{cite web | author = SETI@home | year = 2005 | url = http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/venues.html | title = SETI@home computer venues | accessdate = 2006-06-12}}


==Notes== ==Further reading==
*{{cite journal | title = The Ultimate Hacker: SETI Signals May Need to Be Decontaminated | first = Richard A. Jr. | last = Carrigan | journal = Bioastronomy 2002: Life Among the Stars |year = 2003 | volume = 213 | publisher=Astronomical Society of the Pacific | page = 519 | bibcode=2004IAUS..213..519C}}
{{Reflist}}
*{{cite news | title = Scientists be on guard... | url = http://technology.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,16559,1650296,00.html | author = Sample, Ian | work = The Guardian |access-date = 25 November 2005 | location=London | date=25 November 2005<!-- no valid last modified available -->}}
*{{Cite web |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/05/aliens-on-your-packard-bell/527445/ |title=A Brief History of SETI@Home |publisher=The Atlantic |first=Sarah |last=Scoles |date=May 23, 2017}}


==External links== ==External links==
{{Commons category|SETI@home}}
* - the project's website
* {{Official website| https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/ }}
:* (the tradeoff between time and bandwidth changed after this)
* {{YouTube|id=IfeGNAZY92k|title=SETI@home screensaver video}}
:* split between ] and ] aspects.
*
:* (unofficial, not editable)
*
*
*
*
*
*


{{BOINC topics}} {{BOINC topics}}
{{Extraterrestrial life}}
]
{{Portal bar|Free and open-source software|Astronomy|Stars|Spaceflight|Outer space|Solar System|Science}}
]
]
]


{{DEFAULTSORT:SETI at home}}
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 04:17, 3 November 2024

BOINC based volunteer computing project searching for signs of extraterrestrial intelligence
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (December 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (December 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)

SETI@home
Screensaver with custom background
Developer(s)University of California, Berkeley
Initial releaseMay 17, 1999 (1999-05-17)
Stable releaseSETI@home v8:8.00 / December 30, 2015; 8 years ago (2015-12-30)

SETI@home v8 for NVIDIA and AMD/ATi GPU Card:8.12/
May 19, 2016; 8 years ago (2016-05-19)
AstroPulse v7:7.00/
October 7, 2014; 10 years ago (2014-10-07)

AstroPulse v7 for nVidia and AMD/ATi GPU Card:7.10/
April 23, 2015; 9 years ago (2015-04-23)
Development statusIn hibernation
Project goal(s)Discovery of radio evidence of extraterrestrial life
FundingPublic funding and private donations
Operating systemMicrosoft Windows, Linux, Android, macOS, Solaris,
IBM AIX, FreeBSD, DragonflyBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, HP-UX, IRIX, Tru64 Unix, OS/2 Warp, eComStation
PlatformCross-platform
TypeVolunteer computing
LicenseGPL
Active usersDecrease 91,454 (March 2020)
Total usersIncrease 1,803,163 (March 2020)
Active hosts144,779 (March 2020)
Total hosts165,178 (March 2020)
Websitesetiathome.berkeley.edu

SETI@home ("SETI at home") is a project of the Berkeley SETI Research Center to analyze radio signals with the aim of searching for signs of extraterrestrial intelligence. Until March 2020, it was run as an Internet-based public volunteer computing project that employed the BOINC software platform. It is hosted by the Space Sciences Laboratory at the University of California, Berkeley, and is one of many activities undertaken as part of the worldwide SETI effort.

SETI@home software was released to the public on May 17, 1999, making it the third large-scale use of volunteer computing over the Internet for research purposes, after Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search (GIMPS) was launched in 1996 and distributed.net in 1997. Along with MilkyWay@home and Einstein@home, it is the third major computing project of this type that has the investigation of phenomena in interstellar space as its primary purpose.

In March 2020, the project stopped sending out new work to SETI@home users, bringing the crowdsourced computing aspect of the project to a stop. At the time, the team intended to shift focus onto the analysis and interpretation of the 20 years' worth of accumulated data. However, the team left open the possibility of eventually resuming volunteer computing using data from other radio telescopes, such as MeerKAT and FAST.

As of November 2021, the science team has analysed the data and removed noisy signals (Radio Frequency Interference) using the Nebula tool they developed and will choose the top-scoring 100 or so multiplets to be observed using the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope, to which they have been granted 24 hours of observation time.

Scientific research

The two original goals of SETI@home were:

  • to do useful scientific work by supporting an observational analysis to detect intelligent life outside Earth
  • to prove the viability and practicality of the "volunteer computing" concept

The second of these goals is considered to have succeeded completely. The current BOINC environment, a development of the original SETI@home, is providing support for many computationally intensive projects in a wide range of disciplines.

The first of these goals has to date yielded no conclusive results: no evidence for ETI signals has been shown via SETI@home. However, the ongoing continuation is predicated on the assumption that the observational analysis is not "ill-posed." The remainder of this article deals specifically with the original SETI@home observations/analysis. The vast majority of the sky (over 98%) has yet to be surveyed, and each point in the sky must be surveyed many times to exclude even a subset of possibilities.

Procedure details

SETI@home searches for possible evidence of radio transmissions from extraterrestrial intelligence using observational data from the Arecibo radio telescope and the Green Bank Telescope. The data is taken "piggyback" or "passively" while the telescope is used for other scientific programs. The data is digitized, stored, and sent to the SETI@home facility. The data is then parsed into small chunks in frequency and time, and analyzed, using software, to search for any signals—that is, variations which cannot be ascribed to noise, and hence contain information. Using volunteer computing, SETI@home sends the millions of chunks of data to be analyzed off-site by home computers, and then have those computers report the results. Thus what appears a difficult problem in data analysis is reduced to a reasonable one by aid from a large, Internet-based community of borrowed computer resources.

The software searches for five types of signals that distinguish them from noise:

  • Spikes in power spectra
  • Gaussian rises and falls in transmission power, possibly representing the telescope beam's main lobe passing over a radio source
  • Triplets – three power spikes in a row
  • Pulsing signals that possibly represent a narrowband digital-style transmission
  • Autocorrelation detects signal waveforms.

There are many variations on how an ETI signal may be affected by the interstellar medium, and by the relative motion of its origin compared to Earth. The potential "signal" is thus processed in many ways (although not testing all detection methods nor scenarios) to ensure the highest likelihood of distinguishing it from the scintillating noise already present in all directions of outer space. For instance, another planet is very likely to be moving at a speed and acceleration with respect to Earth, and that will shift the frequency, over time, of the potential "signal." Checking for this through processing is done, to an extent, in the SETI@home software.

The process is somewhat like tuning a radio to various channels, and looking at the signal strength meter. If the strength of the signal goes up, that gets attention. More technically, it involves a lot of digital signal processing, mostly discrete Fourier transforms at various chirp rates and durations.

Results

To date, the project has not confirmed the detection of any ETI signals. However, it has identified several candidate targets (sky positions), where the spike in intensity is not easily explained as noise spots, for further analysis. The most significant candidate signal to date was announced on September 1, 2004, named Radio source SHGb02+14a.

While the project has not reached the stated primary goal of finding extraterrestrial intelligence, it has proved to the scientific community that volunteer computing projects using Internet-connected computers can succeed as a viable analysis tool, and even beat the largest supercomputers. However, it has not been demonstrated that the order of magnitude excess in computers used, many outside the home (the original intent was to use 50,000–100,000 "home" computers), has benefited the project scientifically. (For more on this, see § Challenges below.)

Astronomer Seth Shostak stated in 2004 that he expects to get a conclusive signal and proof of alien contact between 2020 and 2025, based on the Drake equation. This implies that a prolonged effort may benefit SETI@home, despite its (present) twenty-year run without success in ETI detection.

Technology

Anybody with an at least intermittently Internet-connected computer was able to participate in SETI@home by running a free program that downloaded and analyzed radio telescope data.

Observational data were recorded on 2-terabyte SATA hard disk drives fed from the Arecibo Telescope in Puerto Rico, each holding about 2.5 days of observations, which were then sent to Berkeley. Arecibo does not have a broadband Internet connection, so data must go by postal mail to Berkeley. Once there, it is divided in both time and frequency domains work units of 107 seconds of data, or approximately 0.35 megabytes (350 kilobytes or 350,000 bytes), which overlap in time but not in frequency. These work units are then sent from the SETI@home server over the Internet to personal computers around the world to analyze.

Data was merged into a database using SETI@home computers in Berkeley. Interference was rejected, and various pattern-detection algorithms were applied to search for the most interesting signals.

The project used CUDA for GPU processing starting in 2015.

In 2016 SETI@home began processing data from the Breakthrough Listen project.

Software

The BOINC Manager working on the SETI@home project (v 7.6.22)
Screenshot of SETI@home Classic Screensaver (v3.07)

The SETI@home volunteer computing software ran either as a screensaver or continuously while a user worked, making use of processor time that would otherwise be unused.

The initial software platform, now referred to as "SETI@home Classic", ran from May 17, 1999, to December 15, 2005. This program was only capable of running SETI@home; it was replaced by Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC), which also allows users to contribute to other volunteer computing projects at the same time as running SETI@home. The BOINC platform also allowed testing for more types of signals.

The discontinuation of the SETI@home Classic platform rendered older Macintosh computers running the classic Mac OS (pre December, 2001) unsuitable for participating in the project.

SETI@home was available for the Sony PlayStation 3 console.

On May 3, 2006, new work units for a new version of SETI@home called "SETI@home Enhanced" started distribution. Since computers had the power for more computationally intensive work than when the project began, this new version was more sensitive by a factor of two concerning Gaussian signals and to some kinds of pulsed signals than the original SETI@home (BOINC) software. This new application had been optimized to the point where it would run faster on some work units than earlier versions. However, some work units (the best work units, scientifically speaking) would take significantly longer.

In addition, some distributions of the SETI@home applications were optimized for a particular type of CPU. They were referred to as "optimized executables", and had been found to run faster on systems specific for that CPU. As of 2007, most of these applications were optimized for Intel processors and their corresponding instruction sets.

The results of the data processing were normally automatically transmitted when the computer was next connected to the Internet; it could also be instructed to connect to the Internet as needed.

Statistics

With over 5.2 million participants worldwide, the project was the volunteer computing project with the most participants to date. The original intent of SETI@home was to utilize 50,000–100,000 home computers. Since its launch on May 17, 1999, the project has logged over two million years of aggregate computing time. On September 26, 2001, SETI@home had performed a total of 10 floating point operations. It was acknowledged by the 2008 edition of the Guinness World Records as the largest computation in history. With over 145,000 active computers in the system (1.4 million total) in 233 countries, as of 23 June 2013, SETI@home had the ability to compute over 668 teraFLOPS. For comparison, the Tianhe-2 computer, which as of 23 June 2013 was the world's fastest supercomputer, was able to compute 33.86 petaFLOPS (approximately 50 times greater).

Project future

There were plans to get data from the Parkes Observatory in Australia to analyze the southern hemisphere. However, as of 3 June 2018, these plans were not mentioned in the project's website. Other plans include a Multi-Beam Data Recorder, a Near Time Persistency Checker and Astropulse (an application that uses coherent dedispersion to search for pulsed signals). Astropulse will team with the original SETI@home to detect other sources, such as rapidly rotating pulsars, exploding primordial black holes, or as-yet unknown astrophysical phenomena. Beta testing of the final public release version of Astropulse was completed in July 2008, and the distribution of work units to higher spec machines capable of processing the more CPU intensive work units started in mid-July 2008.

On March 31, 2020, UC Berkeley stopped sending out new data for SETI@Home clients to process, ending the effort for the time being. The program stated they were at a point of "diminishing returns" with the volunteer processing and needed to put the effort into hibernation while they processed the results.

Competitive aspect

SETI@home users quickly started to compete with one another to process the maximum number of work units. Teams were formed to combine the efforts of individual users. The competition continued and grew larger with the introduction of BOINC.

As with any competition, attempts have been made to "cheat" the system and claim credit for work that has not been performed. To combat cheats, the SETI@home system sends every work unit to multiple computers, a value known as "initial replication" (currently 2). Credit is only granted for each returned work unit once a minimum number of results have been returned and the results agree, a value known as "minimum quorum" (currently 2). If, due to computation errors or cheating by submitting false data, not enough results agree, more identical work units are sent out until the minimum quorum can be reached. The final credit granted to all machines which returned the correct result is the same and is the lowest of the values claimed by each machine.

Some users have installed and run SETI@home on computers at their workplaces; an act known as "Borging", after the assimilation-driven Borg of Star Trek. In some cases, SETI@home users have misused company resources to gain work-unit results with at least two individuals getting fired for running SETI@home on an enterprise production system. There is a thread in the newsgroup alt.sci.seti which bears the title "Anyone fired for SETI screensaver" and ran starting as early as September 14, 1999.

Other users collect large quantities of equipment together at home to create "SETI farms", which typically consist of a number of computers consisting of only a motherboard, CPU, RAM and power supply that are arranged on shelves as diskless workstations running either Linux or old versions of Microsoft Windows "headless" (without a monitor).

Challenges

Closure of Arecibo Observatory

Until 2020, SETI@home procured its data from the Arecibo Observatory facility that was operated by the National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center and administered by SRI International.

The decreasing operating budget for the observatory has created a shortfall of funds which has not been made up from other sources such as private donors, NASA, other foreign research institutions, nor private non-profit organizations such as SETI@home.

However, in the overall long-term views held by many involved with the SETI project, any usable radio telescope could take over from Arecibo (which completely collapsed in December 2020), as all the SETI systems are portable and relocatable.

More restrictive computer use policies in businesses

In one documented case, an individual was fired for explicitly importing and using the SETI@home software on computers used for the U.S. state of Ohio. In another incident a school IT director resigned after his installation allegedly cost his school district $1 million in removal costs; however, other reasons for this firing included lack of communication with his superiors, not installing firewall software and alleged theft of computer equipment, leading a ZDNet editor to comment that "the volunteer computing nonsense was simply the best and most obvious excuse the district had to terminate his contract with cause".

As of 16 October 2005, approximately one-third of the processing for the non-BOINC version of the software was performed on work or school based machines. As many of these computers will give reduced privileges to ordinary users, it is possible that much of this has been done by network administrators.

To some extent, this may be offset by better connectivity to home machines and increasing performance of home computers, especially those with GPUs, which have also benefited other volunteer computing projects such as Folding@Home. The spread of mobile computing devices provides another large resource for volunteer computing. For example, in 2012, Piotr Luszczek (a former doctoral student of Jack Dongarra) presented results showing that an iPad 2 matched the historical performance of a Cray-2 (the fastest computer in the world in 1985) on an embedded LINPACK benchmark.

Funding

There is currently no government funding for SETI research, and private funding is always limited. Berkeley Space Science Lab has found ways of working with small budgets, and the project has received donations allowing it to go well beyond its original planned duration, but it still has to compete for limited funds with other SETI projects and other space sciences projects.

In a December 16, 2007 plea for donations, SETI@home stated its present modest state and urged donations of $476,000 needed for continuation into 2008.

Unofficial clients

A number of individuals and companies made unofficial changes to the distributed part of the software to try to produce faster results, but this compromised the integrity of all the results. As a result, the software had to be updated to make it easier to detect such changes, and discover unreliable clients. BOINC will run on unofficial clients; however, clients that return different and therefore incorrect data are not allowed, so corrupting the result database is avoided. BOINC relies on cross-checking to validate data but unreliable clients need to be identified, to avoid situations when two of these report the same invalid data and therefore corrupt the database. A very popular unofficial client (lunatic) allows users to take advantage of the special features provided by their processor(s) such as SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, and AVX to allow for faster processing.

Hardware and database failures

This section possibly contains original research. The section appears to be original research elaboration upon the passing mention of "The sources of failure, both hardware and software,seemed limitless." in . Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (February 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

SETI@home is a test bed for further development not only of BOINC but of other hardware and software (database) technology. Under SETI@home processing loads, these experimental technologies can be more challenging than expected, as SETI databases do not have typical accounting and business data or relational structures. The non-traditional database uses often do incur greater processing overheads and risk of database corruption and outright database failure. Hardware, software and database failures can (and do) cause dips in project participation.

The project has had to shut down several times to change over to new databases capable of handling more massive datasets. Hardware failure has proven to be a substantial source of project shutdowns, as hardware failure is often coupled with database corruption.

See also

References

  1. "Choosing BOINC projects". boinc.berkeley.edu. Archived from the original on January 3, 2018. Retrieved January 3, 2023.
  2. "DownloadOther – BOINC". boinc.berkeley.edu. Archived from the original on January 3, 2023. Retrieved January 3, 2023.
  3. "Porting and optimizing SETI@home". setiathome.berkeley.edu. Archived from the original on January 3, 2023. Retrieved January 3, 2023.
  4. ^ "Detailed stats – SETI@Home". BOINC stats. Archived from the original on January 4, 2015. Retrieved March 5, 2020.
  5. Tony Phillips (May 23, 1999). "ET, phone SETI@home!". NASA. Archived from the original on October 1, 2006. Retrieved October 6, 2006.
  6. Nemiroff, R.; Bonnell, J., eds. (May 17, 1999). "How to Search for Aliens". Astronomy Picture of the Day. NASA. Retrieved October 6, 2006.
  7. "SETI@home Classic: In Memoriam". December 15, 2005. Archived from the original on March 8, 2007. Retrieved October 6, 2006.
  8. "Searches For ET!". Net Talk Live!. Archived from the original on August 15, 2000. Retrieved January 12, 2022.
  9. Overbye, Dennis (March 23, 2020). "The Search for E.T. Goes on Hold, for Now". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on April 7, 2020. Retrieved March 23, 2020.
  10. Oberhaus, Daniel (March 3, 2020). "SETI@Home Is Over. But the Search for Alien Life Continues". Wired. Archived from the original on February 28, 2021. Retrieved February 27, 2021.
  11. "New zones, a milestone, and next steps". setiathome.berkeley.edu. Archived from the original on November 27, 2021. Retrieved November 27, 2021.
  12. ^ Anderson, David P.; Cobb, Jeff; Korpela, Eric; Lebofsky, Matt; Werthimer, Dan (November 2002). "SETI@home: an experiment in public-resource computing". Communications of the ACM. 45 (11): 56–61. doi:10.1145/581571.581573. ISSN 0001-0782. S2CID 15439521. Archived from the original on September 20, 2022. Retrieved September 19, 2022.
  13. "S.E.T.I. - 100000 pr". sites.google.com. Archived from the original on September 20, 2022. Retrieved September 19, 2022.
  14. "Berkeley SETI". seti.berkeley.edu. Archived from the original on July 31, 2018. Retrieved June 10, 2017.
  15. "How SETI@Home Works – What is SETI@home Looking For?". SETI@Home Classic. Archived from the original on September 9, 2019. Retrieved June 23, 2010.
  16. "Signal Candidate". Classic SETI@home. Archived from the original on September 1, 2007. Retrieved June 23, 2010.
  17. "BOINC combined – Credit overview". BOINCstats. Archived from the original on January 22, 2013. Retrieved June 23, 2010.
  18. ^ "Sullivan, et al.: Seti@Home". Seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu. Archived from the original on December 21, 2008. Retrieved May 17, 2009.
  19. Shostak, Seth (July 22, 2004). "First Contact Within 20 Years: Shostak". Space Daily. Archived from the original on June 29, 2006. Retrieved June 12, 2006.
  20. ^ Korpela, Eric; Dan Werthimer; David Anderson; Jeff Cobb; Matt Lebofsky (January 2001). "SETI@home – Massively Distributed Computing for SETI" (PDF). Computing in Science & Engineering. 3 (1): 78–83. Bibcode:2001CSE.....3a..78K. doi:10.1109/5992.895191. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 23, 2014. Retrieved October 25, 2005.
  21. "About SETI@home page 2". Seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu. Archived from the original on March 10, 2020. Retrieved May 17, 2009.
  22. SETI@home (2001). "The SETI@home Sky Survey". Archived from the original on April 22, 2020. Retrieved June 2, 2006.
  23. "Applications". Archived from the original on October 5, 2022. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
  24. "Breakthrough Initiatives". breakthroughinitiatives.org. Archived from the original on May 31, 2019. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
  25. "SETI@home applications". Archived from the original on January 8, 2008.
  26. "Seti@Home optimized science apps and information". Lunatics.kwsn.net. Archived from the original on April 24, 2009. Retrieved May 17, 2009.
  27. Newport, Stuart, ed. (2005). "Largest Computation". Guinness World Records. HCI Entertainment. Archived from the original on November 28, 2005. Retrieved December 3, 2005.
  28. "SETI@Home Project". BOINC Stats. Archived from the original on July 3, 2013. Retrieved June 23, 2013.
  29. "Southern Hemisphere Search – increasing SETI@home's sky coverage in the "Future directions of SETI@home"". Classic SETI@home website. Archived from the original on February 19, 2007. Retrieved June 23, 2010.
  30. "SETI@home Plans". SETI@home. Archived from the original on October 11, 2007. Retrieved June 23, 2010.
  31. "Astropulse FAQ". Setiathome.berkeley.edu. Archived from the original on April 29, 2009. Retrieved May 17, 2009.
  32. Cooper, Daniel (March 4, 2020). "SETI@Home ends its crowdsourced search for alien life after 21 years". Engadget. Archived from the original on March 5, 2020. Retrieved March 4, 2020.
  33. "BBC 2002". BBC News. January 28, 2002. Archived from the original on January 7, 2009. Retrieved May 17, 2009.
  34. "Anyone fired for SETI screensaver". groups.google.com. Archived from the original on June 6, 2022. Retrieved June 6, 2022.
  35. "SETI Stack and farm systems". Bhs.broo.k12.wv.us. Archived from the original on January 31, 2009. Retrieved July 14, 2009.
  36. "Giant Arecibo radio telescope collapses in Puerto Rico". The Guardian. Associated Press. December 1, 2020. Archived from the original on December 5, 2020. Retrieved December 1, 2020.
  37. Coto, Danica (December 1, 2020). "Huge Puerto Rico radio telescope, already damaged, collapses". AP NEWS. Archived from the original on April 22, 2021. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
  38. John Adams (October 9, 2004). "Knock Down, Then Kick – O'Reilly Databases". Oreillynet.com. Archived from the original on May 13, 2013. Retrieved May 17, 2009.
  39. "Higley firing tied to alien-search software". The Arizona Republic. November 30, 2009. Archived from the original on April 7, 2010.
  40. Christopher Dawson (December 2, 2009). "Admin fired for incompetence, not alien search". ZDNet. Archived from the original on May 11, 2010. Retrieved November 20, 2013.
  41. SETI@home (2005). "SETI@home computer venues". Archived from the original on July 3, 2008. Retrieved June 12, 2006.
  42. "SETI@home now supports Intel GPUs". January 29, 2014. Archived from the original on February 20, 2015. Retrieved February 19, 2015.
  43. Darren Murph (September 29, 2006). "Stanford University tailors Folding@home to GPUs". Archived from the original on October 12, 2007. Retrieved February 19, 2015.
  44. Mike Houston. "Folding@Home – GPGPU". Archived from the original on October 27, 2007. Retrieved February 19, 2015.
  45. Larabel, Michael (September 16, 2012). "Apple iPad 2 As Fast As The Cray-2 Super Computer". Archived from the original on February 20, 2015. Retrieved February 19, 2015.
  46. Molnar, David (2000). "The SETI@Home Problem". Crossroads. 7 (1). Archived from the original on July 15, 2012. Retrieved January 30, 2011.
  47. "SecurityIssues – BOINC – Trac". Boinc.berkeley.edu. Archived from the original on June 5, 2011. Retrieved May 17, 2009.

Further reading

External links

Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC) projects
Active
Beta
Alpha
Technology,
tools
Terminated
or inactive
Extraterrestrial life
Events and objects
Signals of interest
Misidentified
Stars
Other
Life in the Universe
Planetary
habitability
Space missions
Interstellar
communication
Types of alleged
extraterrestrial beings
Hypotheses
Fermi paradox solutions
Related topics
Portals: Categories: