Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Chuut-Riit: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:35, 2 January 2008 editRobJ1981 (talk | contribs)32,546 edits →Chuut-Riit: note to closing admin← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:22, 6 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''Delete''' <i>]</i> <sup>]</sup> <sub>]</sub> 23:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}}


:{{la|Chuut-Riit}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Chuut-Riit}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Line 8: Line 14:
* Unless notability can be proven by sources, per the guidelines of ] this should be '''merged''' into ] —] (]) 05:15, 1 January 2008 (UTC) * Unless notability can be proven by sources, per the guidelines of ] this should be '''merged''' into ] —] (]) 05:15, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
*'''merge'''. ] (]) 11:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC) *'''merge'''. ] (]) 11:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per ]. Happy New Year! Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 18:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC) *'''Keep''' per ]. Happy New Year! Sincerely, --<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;">]</span><sup>'']''</sup> 18:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
:'''Note to closing admin'''. The page that Le Grand mentions is just an essay and isn't a requirement to follow when editing. ] (]) 06:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC) :'''Note to closing admin'''. The page that Le Grand mentions is just an essay and isn't a requirement to follow when editing. ] (]) 06:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
*'''Merge''', I checked, there are no online sources that could be used to save this article. In light of the fact that there is a place to merge, it should be merged there. ] (]) 02:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC) *'''Merge''', I checked, there are no online sources that could be used to save this article. In light of the fact that there is a place to merge, it should be merged there. ] (]) 02:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small><small>—] (]) 10:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' as article fails ] and ]. There are no reliable sources to demonstrate the notability of this ] outside of the Man-Kzin Wars franchise. --] (]) 10:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
**'''Comment''' On what basis do you claim this is a ]? ] (]) 03:32, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' No real world significance is established or even suggested for this character, & it therefore fails our notability requirements for fictional topics. ] (]) 20:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 02:22, 6 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete JERRY contribs 23:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Chuut-Riit

Chuut-Riit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

There is no assertion of notability through reliable sources, and as such its just an in-universe plot repetition of various plot points from the source article. Therefore, it should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 03:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Note to closing admin. The page that Le Grand mentions is just an essay and isn't a requirement to follow when editing. RobJ1981 (talk) 06:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.