Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Brahmin Tamil: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:28, 6 January 2008 editMostlyharmless (talk | contribs)4,420 editsm →Brahmin Tamil: insert moved from prod← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:01, 28 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''Keep''' --] 02:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}}


:{{la|Brahmin Tamil}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Brahmin Tamil}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Deserves discussion - appearance at wikibooks is not sufficient reason for Prod deletion ] (]) 03:45, 6 January 2008 (UTC) Deserves discussion - appearance at wikibooks is not sufficient reason for Prod deletion ] (]) 03:45, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
:Obviously there's a wikibook with the same content. However, I think that the subject here meets ], ], and other criteria, and with a few alterations will form a decent article on the subject. ] (]) 03:51, 6 January 2008 (UTC) :Obviously there's a wikibook with the same content. However, I think that the subject here meets ], ], and other criteria, and with a few alterations will form a decent article on the subject. ] (]) 03:51, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
*'''Strong Keep''' no reason for deletion. ]<sup>] | ]</sup> 03:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC) *'''Strong Keep''' no reason for deletion. ]<sup>] | ]</sup> 03:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
*'''Speedy keep''', Nominator has stated reasons for ''keeping'', not deletion. ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 04:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC) *'''Speedy keep''', Nominator has stated reasons for ''keeping'', not deletion. ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 04:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
** ] (]) 04:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC) ** ] (]) 04:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
***Oops. So does that mean that we close this? ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 04:28, 6 January 2008 (UTC) ***Oops. So does that mean that we close this? ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 04:28, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I can see no valid rationale for deletion. The article needs work, so '''keep''' for improvement.--] ] 09:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', unless someone wants to make an actual argument for deletion beyond "copy of Wikibooks" (which is GFDL). If there is an issue with attribution I understand there is a technical fix. --] | ] 22:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
*'''Strong Keep''' There is no valid reason for the deletion of this page. This page talks about a particular dialect of spoken Tamil. Perhaps there could be more work and referencing of sources to back up the article. ] (]) 04:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' article obviously needs work, but does not need to be deleted ]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 05:00, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 23:01, 28 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep --JForget 02:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Brahmin Tamil

Brahmin Tamil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Deserves discussion - appearance at wikibooks is not sufficient reason for Prod deletion Mostlyharmless (talk) 03:45, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Obviously there's a wikibook with the same content. However, I think that the subject here meets WP:V, WP:N, and other criteria, and with a few alterations will form a decent article on the subject. Mostlyharmless (talk) 03:51, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.