| Revision as of 20:36, 6 January 2008 editMatthewcollins1989 (talk | contribs)154 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:54, 23 November 2015 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,132,848 edits →ArbCom elections are now open!: new section | ||
| (33 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == File:British Empire Anachronous 6.png listed for deletion == | |||
| ==]== | |||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Fdw -->] (]) 21:36, 19 May 2010 (UTC) <small>(Please note that this article for deletion request was posted by myself ''on behalf of {{user|Vadac}} who asked for assistance with posting to AfD.<small><span style="border: 1px solid; background-color:darkblue;">]]</span></small> 21:44, 19 May 2010 (UTC))</small> | |||
| ] | |||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you are doing in ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> ~ ] 22:00, 3 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :I was under the honest impression that the 3RR rule applied to the same words, rather than the article as a whole. Two separate incidents occurred on the ] page today, which had come up before and the proposed changes that I was reverting were against the consensus. So in retrospect having had this explained to me, I acknowledge breaking the 3RR rule in this case, but for what it's worth, my reverts were in good faith. ] 22:25, 3 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::Fine with me. ] blocks are supposed to be preventive, not punitive, so your acknowledgement of the rule should keep you in the clear. --] 22:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691988767 --> | |||
| ==United Kingdom== | |||
| I have warned the user in question about his 3RR and asked him to revert his latest one. Be cautious as you are at 3RR as | |||
| well. If he refuses, I will report him. Thanks. ] 17:33, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Reply== | |||
| I think your knowledge of Misplaced Pages is inadequate, this is an article of "United Kingdom", not the British Empire, which forms a part of it's history, which is where this fact is mentioned. | |||
| And beware that it is not my liking or yours that determines what goes in here, but facts in the right neutrality. That is the key to working in Misplaced Pages. Regards,] 17:45, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :An opinion you could have discussed on the talk page, instead of doing a 4RR and then disputing it here and with insults on my talk page AJ. ] 17:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::: ''Not'' an opinion, Mark, the Misplaced Pages works on rules. See some featured articles, like ], and you will understand how Misplaced Pages works. This is not a place to over state things to satisfy ones personal feelings. it is an encyclopedia. Hope you understand. Regards. ] 17:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Rules which you have just ], and have been reported for. ] 17:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I am affraid it is ''you'' who has broken the 3RR rule. Seeing your page, it is clear this isnt the first time you've done this.] 18:01, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::For someone that lectures others on rules, it might be wise to understand them first. My three reverts do not break the 3RR rule. Your four do though. ] 18:04, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Obviously your lack of knowledge shows. And like I said, your page indicates your editing history. For a reference, see mine. Would help explain how Misplaced Pages works. Also see some featured articles (which reflect the best of Misplaced Pages), which ] isnt, and will understand why it isnt. Be a mature editor, and avoid adding pompousity and chest thumping material. There are other forums to express these, like blogs. Feel free to do so there. They a meant for that. But an encyclopedia is a place to mention '''facts''' in the right place, with the right weight. Once again stating that this is an article on the country '''United Kingdom''', not the British Empire, where these things can be stated (what you repeatedly add)] 18:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Let's await the outcome of the 3RR request AJ and then see if you are still editing. If you do get blocked, I would advise being more cautious in throwing insults around like tour "lack of knowledge" one here - GSD2000 has frequently been shown to be a courteous and knowledgeable editor and deserves more respect. You may be right for all I know about your other points, but like I said, they would be better discussed first on the correct talk page rather than doing multiple edit reverts to try to force the matter. ] 18:18, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I eagerly await the result Mark. My editing history is there for all to see. The History of ] itself shows who ''began'' the multiple reverts. the "knowledgeable" editor GSD2000. I am mearly responding to the impolite comments on my page, some of which hinted at questioning my neutrity.] 18:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't see any challenges to your neutrality on your talk page, or indeed any remarks at all to do with United Kingdom before you did the 3RR. ] 18:35, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: "whether you like those relations or not, and I suspect you don't, which is the reason for your removal of it". by User Gsd2000. Also, be informed that my last edit was the 3rd revert. Not 4th. By definition my first revert was ''after'' user Gsd2000 reverted my edit. Honestly would have appreciated if you had first understood what was edited, before reverting yourself. I generally edit articles to improve them, not to push views. Again, refer my edit history.] 18:41, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==IRA killings== | |||
| You might be interested to see what is happening here ] | |||
| Check my user logs and you will quickly see the agenda here...]]<sup><font color="brown"><small>(kiwiexile at DMOZ)</small></font></sup> • 19:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Corsica== | |||
| Hello! I just read your article ] and am wondering how the Kingdom of Great Britain was in personal union with Corsica from 1794 to 1796 - there don't seem to be any sources/references/etcetera? Regards.--] (]) 20:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:54, 23 November 2015
File:British Empire Anachronous 6.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:British Empire Anachronous 6.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vadac (talk) 21:36, 19 May 2010 (UTC) (Please note that this article for deletion request was posted by myself on behalf of Vadac (talk · contribs) who asked for assistance with posting to AfD. Chzz ► 21:44, 19 May 2010 (UTC))
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)