| Revision as of 05:30, 7 January 2008 editWhisperToMe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users661,378 editsm →Section names← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:04, 29 November 2015 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,500 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:NcSchu/Archive 3) (bot | ||
| (288 intermediate revisions by 76 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Archive box| | |||
| Archives! | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| }} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 50K | |||
| |counter = 3 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 0 | |||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 0 | |||
| |algo = old(5d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:NcSchu/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{Usertalksuper}} | |||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| <!--Please put new talk page subjects under this text and put the newest subjects at the bottom. Thanks!--> | |||
| ==British Airways== | |||
| Thanks for the clarification on the Manchester Airport situation with BA. Regards, ] <sub>]</sub> 17:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Continental Airlines== | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --] 05:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I'd appreciate some research on your hand before you accuse me of breaking the 3-revert-rule. I was reversing vandalism each and every time, and the last time I checked this was ''not'' a violation of the 3RR. If you need some explaining, the anon user ] continuously changed an entry in the article to make it seem like Continental Airlines had ] aircraft instead of Boeing 777-200ER aircraft, which is simply not true. The anon user was continuously on the offense in his edit comments, saying words such as "prove it", "idiot", and "wrong" and then when I did "prove" it, he simply reverted it again and said that he didn't care. Fortunately another user corrected it this time, however it clearly shows no wrong doing on my part. Thank you. ]<sub>(])</sub> 16:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::]. --] 19:40, 10 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Specifically when two users revert each other's edits simply because they disagree with one another's edits. That was not the case here, in which I was reverting an edit that was clearly false: Continental does not have 777-200LR aircraft, they have 777-200ER aircraft. I find it absurd that I should ignore the correction of false information simply because of the 3RR. I understand how it could easily have looked like an edit war, but I also had indications that the anon user was a vandal, especially after he/she ignored referrals to sources. ]<sub>(])</sub> 20:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Manchester Airport colour changes== | |||
| In retrospect, I agree. Best, — ] <sub>]</sub> 20:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Newark Airport logo == | |||
| ]] | |||
| Well... Do you still think SVG version is worse than PNG. About that it's on my user page... Look: Nowhere it's said "My creations", but "my contributions" and... This is one.<br>''']''' <small>(])</small> 14:41, 15 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Learn some manners == | |||
| When editing wiki, there's no need to use the summary lines to insult other people & call their contributions "silly". Grow up; you're not a teenager anymore. - ] (]) 18:11, 20 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I was in fact not specifically calling you silly. If you re-read the edit comment you'll see I was calling the use of abbreviations in general, such as "w/", silly, because they really don't make sense in the context of an article when space-saving is not required. Seriously, "silly" is a very light and comical word to use (unlike, "stupid", which is by far immature). You're over-reacting, especially telling me to "grow up" (no need to insult people, eh?). In fact, you end up being slightly hypocritical by doing the exact same thing you scold me for in your edit comment. I hope there's no need to have this very minute and, if you'll excuse me, silly, incident get in the way of editing. Regards, ]<sub>(])</sub> 18:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == EWR-AMS == | |||
| Try going to NWA's website again. No NWA operated EWR-AMS flights are loaded into NWA's schedules. The only flights i have found is '''Northwest Airlines Flight 8658''', which is operated by KLM. Flights from EWR-AMS won't happen for the next 2-3 months. Also check the EWR website. ] (]) 18:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I found the problem, I was using the default dates that the NWA spits out, whereas you were probably using today's date. Doing some date-picking I've found that the NWA flights begin on January 6th. Even though it's in a couple of days I'll still add in the end/begin templates. Thanks. ]<sub>(])</sub> 18:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Terminated destinations== | |||
| To my knowledge, terminated destinations are NOT relevant to airports but ARE relevant to airline destination lists. Is there a place where a group of people came to a consensus about airline destinations? ] (]) 00:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Which talk page? And how is "historically relevant" defined? | |||
| Anyhow, I make sure that all such terminated destinations have citations (my favorites are those explaining why the routes fell, i.e. BA with Zimbabwe, AC with Delhi, etc.) ] (]) 05:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Virgin America destinations == | |||
| I completely agree with you. I've replaced the new article with a redirect to the section you re-instated. I also included a comment that the article shouldn't be re-created without discussion in the Talk page ... ] (]) 00:11, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Section names== | |||
| The reason why each of the sections of "Terminated destinations" begins with "Terminated in " is so the sections may be linked. | |||
| If I tried to type in ] to get a list of terminated destinations for Asia, instead I would get the *first* Asia section, which lists destinations not terminated. | |||
| Hi Sorry, | |||
| Also if one finishes editing a section, Misplaced Pages redirects to the *first* section bearing that name. | |||
| How do I change an Image on a Wiki page do to the Aircraft Livery has now been rebranded & the photo in question has been replaced by a much nicer & newer version? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:42, 22 December 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| In order for a section link to work, the names have to be unique. ] (]) 05:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:04, 29 November 2015
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
 | Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:
|
Hi Sorry,
How do I change an Image on a Wiki page do to the Aircraft Livery has now been rebranded & the photo in question has been replaced by a much nicer & newer version? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisxuereb1989 (talk • contribs) 12:42, 22 December 2014 (UTC)