| Revision as of 07:56, 10 January 2008 editMayalld (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers20,695 edits →Run Rincewind Run!: c← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:30, 4 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''Delete'''. ] (]) 22:20, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{ns:0|F}} | |||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|F}} | |||
| :{{la|Run Rincewind Run!}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Run Rincewind Run!}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| '''Delete''' NN fanfilm. Fails to meet notability requirements of ]. Previous PROD was contested on the grounds that ] appears in it. However, his was not a sufficiently major role to make the film notable per ] ] (]) 08:34, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | '''Delete''' NN fanfilm. Fails to meet notability requirements of ]. Previous PROD was contested on the grounds that ] appears in it. However, his was not a sufficiently major role to make the film notable per ] ] (]) 08:34, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' No evidence of notability - this film was aparently only shown at a convention and wasn't broadcast. --] (]) 09:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' No evidence of notability - this film was aparently only shown at a convention and wasn't broadcast. --] (]) 09:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] ] 12:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)</small> | *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] ] 12:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''keep'''. Misplaced Pages is not paper; the fact that the film wasn't broadcast doesn't alter its notability for the purposes of wikipedia, IMO. Pratchett appearing in the film, even briefly, surely makes it notable. ] (]) 12:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | *'''keep'''. Misplaced Pages is not paper; the fact that the film wasn't broadcast doesn't alter its notability for the purposes of wikipedia, IMO. Pratchett appearing in the film, even briefly, surely makes it notable. ] (]) 12:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :*'''Comment''' as detailed above, ] defines notability for films, and is explicit that notability is only inherited from a participant if he/she played a major role in the production. Pratchett's role was as a cameo. Whilst the film may (in your opinion), surely be notable, Misplaced Pages policy says otherwise. ] (]) 13:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | :*'''Comment''' as detailed above, ] defines notability for films, and is explicit that notability is only inherited from a participant if he/she played a major role in the production. Pratchett's role was as a cameo. Whilst the film may (in your opinion), surely be notable, Misplaced Pages policy says otherwise. ] (]) 13:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Even if Pratchett was in it, it still fails ]. No reliable sources could be found pertaining to the film, and furthermore, it was only a minor film shown at a convention. ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 13:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Even if Pratchett was in it, it still fails ]. No reliable sources could be found pertaining to the film, and furthermore, it was only a minor film shown at a convention. ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]•])</sup> 13:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep'''. This film has a section in "An Unofficial Companion to the Novels of Terry Pratchett", thus meeting wikipedia's requirements of notability. ] (]) 1:16, 10 January 2008 |
*'''Keep'''. This film has a section in "An Unofficial Companion to the Novels of Terry Pratchett", thus meeting wikipedia's requirements of notability. ] (]) 1:16, 10 January 2008<small>— ] (] • ]) has made ] outside this topic. </small> | ||
| :*'''Comment''' ] seems to disagree with you ] (]) 07:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC) | :*'''Comment''' ] seems to disagree with you ] (]) 07:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' An 18 minute film made at a cost of $300 and shown at a fan convention grossly fails the Misplaced Pages standards for film notability. ] (]) 17:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' An 18 minute film made at a cost of $300 and shown at a fan convention grossly fails the Misplaced Pages standards for film notability. ] (]) 17:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' Given that there is '''a''' source regarding this film, that makes the information about Pratchett's role in the film worthy of inclusion in the article of Terry Pratchett. However, as I'm unfamiliar with the film and mostly unfamiliar with Pratchett's work (I know ''of'' it), I can't say either way whether the film warrants its own article. I lean toward "probably not," but for now, having given my two cents, I'll abstain. ] (]) 22:21, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' Given that there is '''a''' source regarding this film, that makes the information about Pratchett's role in the film worthy of inclusion in the article of Terry Pratchett. However, as I'm unfamiliar with the film and mostly unfamiliar with Pratchett's work (I know ''of'' it), I can't say either way whether the film warrants its own article. I lean toward "probably not," but for now, having given my two cents, I'll abstain. ] (]) 22:21, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''', fan film, doesn't pass notability. ] (]) 03:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', fan film, doesn't pass notability. ] (]) 03:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''', seemingly non-notable. ] (]) 20:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 16:30, 4 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. The Placebo Effect (talk) 22:20, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Run Rincewind Run!
- Run Rincewind Run! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Delete NN fanfilm. Fails to meet notability requirements of WP:NF. Previous PROD was contested on the grounds that Terry Pratchett appears in it. However, his was not a sufficiently major role to make the film notable per WP:NF Mayalld (talk) 08:34, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of notability - this film was aparently only shown at a convention and wasn't broadcast. --Nick Dowling (talk) 09:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:41, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- keep. Misplaced Pages is not paper; the fact that the film wasn't broadcast doesn't alter its notability for the purposes of wikipedia, IMO. Pratchett appearing in the film, even briefly, surely makes it notable. Robinh (talk) 12:45, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment as detailed above, WP:NF defines notability for films, and is explicit that notability is only inherited from a participant if he/she played a major role in the production. Pratchett's role was as a cameo. Whilst the film may (in your opinion), surely be notable, Misplaced Pages policy says otherwise. Mayalld (talk) 13:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Even if Pratchett was in it, it still fails WP:NF. No reliable sources could be found pertaining to the film, and furthermore, it was only a minor film shown at a convention. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 13:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. This film has a section in "An Unofficial Companion to the Novels of Terry Pratchett", thus meeting wikipedia's requirements of notability. Agent Pleochroic (talk) 1:16, 10 January 2008— Agent Pleochroic (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Comment WP:NF seems to disagree with you Mayalld (talk) 07:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete An 18 minute film made at a cost of $300 and shown at a fan convention grossly fails the Misplaced Pages standards for film notability. Edison (talk) 17:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Given that there is a source regarding this film, that makes the information about Pratchett's role in the film worthy of inclusion in the article of Terry Pratchett. However, as I'm unfamiliar with the film and mostly unfamiliar with Pratchett's work (I know of it), I can't say either way whether the film warrants its own article. I lean toward "probably not," but for now, having given my two cents, I'll abstain. LaMenta3 (talk) 22:21, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, fan film, doesn't pass notability. Terraxos (talk) 03:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, seemingly non-notable. Doctorfluffy (talk) 20:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.