Misplaced Pages

User talk:68.224.117.152: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:30, 26 January 2008 edit68.224.117.152 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:07, 3 November 2021 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)Tag: AWB 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:

{{IPsock|Ionas68224|confirmed}}
{{tnull|helpme|Please tell ArbCom because they seem to not have received the above email. I am appealing. --Ionas}} {{tnull|helpme|Please tell ArbCom because they seem to not have received the above email. I am appealing. --Ionas}}


:The ArbCom members have been informed of this message on their respective talk pages. Please do not re-add the {{tnull|helpme}} tag. ArbCom will contact you. --<font color="#617599" face="Courier New">]</font><font color="#999999" face="Courier New">]</font> 02:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC) :The ArbCom members have been informed of this message on their respective talk pages. Please do not re-add the {{tnull|helpme}} tag. ArbCom will contact you. --]] 02:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
:Okay, thanks. --] (]) 02:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC) :Okay, thanks. --] (]) 02:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


Line 52: Line 52:
Ionas Ionas
</pre> </pre>

----

I'm afraid that, having discussed your case, the Committee has declined to unban you.

] ] 16:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:07, 3 November 2021

{{helpme|Please tell ArbCom because they seem to not have received the above email. I am appealing. --Ionas}}

The ArbCom members have been informed of this message on their respective talk pages. Please do not re-add the {{helpme}} tag. ArbCom will contact you. --omtay38 02:17, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. --68.224.117.152 (talk) 02:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Can an arbitrator please respond to this: I have sent the following E-mail to the Arbitration Committee and they have not responded, see the date the mail was sent. The arbitrators either: do not read emails, refused to read mine, or have not got it yet. Now I will WP:AGF that they have not received my email, so I will post it here:

I am User:Ionas68224, and known on IRC as Ionas_Freeman. I have had a 
terrible history here, one that I won't go into great detail about. If you 
don't know, you can review 
http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Ionas68224 or 
http://simple.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Ionas68224 for the 
history. I would like to appeal my block, or what Ryulong and someone named 
"Ryanpostlethwait" on IRC (presumably User:Ryan_Postlethwaite) call a ban 
(even though I am not on LOBU and only they have called it a ban).
I was previously a dick (after I was a vandal), and quite mean, not assuming 
good faith with vandals and basically unsympathetic as User:bibliotheque on 
English Misplaced Pages and kind of chatty on the Simple English Misplaced Pages. I then 
felt that I should change my en.wp name to match my simple.wp name, 
Ionas68224. And so I did. Then, I had made a comment saying on Ryulong 
(someone who I'd never met since then)'s RFC saying that he should be 
desysopped for his meanness, and people ganged up on me saying I had only 
been there 30 days, then saying that it was trolling, and even went so far 
to go that I was a terrible criminal for being on a B.A.D.S.I.T.E. 
wikipediareview, and for supporting Daniel Brandt.
So, now I realise that Daniel is quite a mean person, using the law to 
intimidate people like Phaedriel after finding his old Misplaced Pages Review 
posts outing on WR that a certain editor was transsexual, revealing the real 
identity of Katefan0, and Phaedriel. Accuising one of our nicest Wikipedians 
of being a felon when I think he was actually doing something to "harass and 
annoy" Phaedriel, and I have concluded that since his threats never really 
turn into real lawsuits, he does it to feel proud of hisself.
----
So anyway, I want to contribute constructively under a new account. I will go
under a conditional: If I am allowed back on, I will 
be blocked for up to a week, then, well, you know the rest (in the ARBCOM 
tradition) if I:
a)harass users
b)make mamy personal attacks after being warned
c)am disruptive after being warned, or
d)attack Ryulong (no warning needed)
Is this something we can agree on?
Ionas

I'm afraid that, having discussed your case, the Committee has declined to unban you.

James F. (talk) 16:16, 26 January 2008 (UTC)