| Revision as of 05:59, 13 July 2005 editSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 edits units← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:00, 26 December 2024 edit undoMike Selinker (talk | contribs)Administrators110,478 edits Notification: listing of Category:Pulitzer family (newspapers) at WP:Categories for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (681 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=30 December 2021}} | |||
| *], Sep-Oct 2004 | |||
| == Archives == | |||
| *], Nov 2004 | |||
| *], Sep-Oct 2004 | |||
| *], Nov 2004 | |||
| *], Dec 04 - Jan 05 | *], Dec 04 - Jan 05 | ||
| *], Aug 2005 | |||
| *], Jun 2006 | |||
| *], Aug 2006 ??? | |||
| *], Jun - Aug 2006 | |||
| *], Sep 2006 - 2009 | |||
| *], 2010 - 2015 | |||
| ==] has been nominated for discussion== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 12:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==Changed Title== | |||
| I changed the title of "Culture defines politics" to ]. I think this is a winner of a title for the subject material. I hope you agree. Let me know what you think? Thanks for your consideration and time. ] 19:14, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| I am thinking that to make it an even better title is to title it "Cultural imprinting on politics". Is that okay. "Cultural imprinting" is an adverb and not a straight verb. Is this okay for you? And does it sound better and match encyclopaedic concerns? let me know please.] 15:17, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Cleaning up... == | |||
| I haven't been active here for a while, and don't foresee that changing any time forseeably... so I've been cleaning my user space, and was wondering if you would like ] to be moved to your space? It is still occasionally being attacked by Netoholic, though not for the past month. Best contact me at ]... - ] 05:40, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| : Doing well... I think I'll leave that where it is then, since it's linked to a half-dozen ways. | |||
| - ] 05:51, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Archiving== | |||
| Maurreen, could I ask why you break up chronological archives? It makes things very hard to find. The Post-invasion Iraq archives were very mixed up and material seemed to be missing. Do you have a particular reason for doing things that way? ] 06:52, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :There were 10,000 words missing. I don't know whether it was you or not, but it may be connected to the habit of moving sections of Talk pages around. Do you have a particular reason for archiving in a non-chronological order? It makes it very hard for editors coming after you to find anything. ] 07:04, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Adminship == | |||
| Maurreen, you've done great work on Misplaced Pages. I was wondering if you'd be interesting in a ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 06:19, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Sure thing, then. Remember, much of the opposition was due to your inexperience at the time. Maybe in a few months. Regards --]<sup>]</sup> 07:14, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==MoS== | |||
| Maurreen, do you happen to know whether the MoS is policy or a guideline, and where in Misplaced Pages it states which it is? Best, ] 11:54, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Maurreen, thanks, I found the policy page eventually. The MoS is a guideline. There's policy, semi-policy, and guidelines. I was asking because Jguk put the MoS into the policy category, but so far as I can tell without consensus. Do you happen to know where I'd find the Talk archives from around September-October 2004? That's when it was done, so I'd to see whether there was any discussion about it. Don't go to any trouble to look, though, but if you happen to know that would be helpful. Best, ] 23:57, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Maurreen, thank you, that's very helpful. The person who added the text to the article saying it was policy was ]. I asked him how he knew it was policy, but it seems he added it only because he wanted passing editors not to make radical changes without discussion. Following that, Jguk simply added the policy category on his own initiative. Anyway, I think it's sorted out now. It's a guideline according to the policy page at ]. Best, ] 07:13, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| The issue I've been discussing is adding a rider to the usage and spelling section. It says: "Articles that focus on a topic specific to a particular English-speaking country should generally conform to the spelling of that country." I would like to add that people are not regarded as being "specific" to a particular country, unless they hold office. So, for example, just because John Smith was born in Canada does not mean he has to be written about in Canadian-English, unless he becomes prime minister of Canada, in which case he does. But I'm being opposed. ] 07:23, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| I'm not sure about the EU issue; I'd like to think about it. It would be useful to know when it was added and what the consensus was, so if you know that, it would be helpful, but again don't go to any trouble. I don't agree with it, and I certainly wouldn't want to see it extended beyond treaties etc. It's true that EU documents use British English but that's only because they're written by British translators, and I'm not sure that ought to force all Misplaced Pages editors to use BE to write about any EU treaty or institution. ] 07:38, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Yes, there were only the two, so s/he was clearly a sock. I don't really mind - I was just curious, and I did give in in the end, so dear old Bernard is now in British English. ] 08:33, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry, I forgot: also these ] 07:42, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==New wiki?== | |||
| Sounds interesting. What did you have in mind? ] 08:19, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Maurreen, I tried to leave this message for you twice yesterday, but after saving both times, checked and it wasn't there. So this is third time lucky. ;-) Just to say, I find your idea very interesting, and I think people would love it. But it would be a huge project. Do you have any thoughts as to how to start it? ] 19:15, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry not to get back to you sooner but I've spread myself a little too thin here recently, so I'm finding it hard to keep up with everything. I do love your idea, but can't quite see a way to get it started. There are a couple of editors who have edited some of the journalism pages, who may be in journalism themselves. Did you have any luck with anyone else? We could put up a note somewhere asking for anyone who's interested, but you may not want to announce it widely as it's a good idea. ] 08:31, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I've taken the liberty of moving the discussion you pasted to ] to ], and of putting up a draft format at the project page itself. I'd appreciate it if you'll have a look and tell me if you like it. — ] (]) 21:07, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm glad to see you like my formatting. (The thing that I'm most concerned about is whether the Reasoning paragraph cannot be simply integrated into the introduction.) Anyway, it might be wise to note that I'm going to be away for a week as of tomorrow, which means that - unless you're willing to implement this yourself - it will take some time until this is integrated into Misplaced Pages procedures. Which is good, as it means there's plenty of time for feedback to build up. — ] (]) 08:49, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks. — ] (]) 08:56, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Transport(ation)== | |||
| Maurreen, | |||
| I was trying to be helpful - '']'' is a disambiguation page - the main article you were referring to is at '']''. Also, and unconnected to the first point, you will note that there is no "first major contributor rule". ] refers to that as a "last resort" test, and, of course, you and SV have decided that ] isn't policy, but only a take-it-or-leave-it guideline anyway. Kind regards, ] 19:17, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == New Wiki Q == | |||
| You mean a non-] wiki? ] 08:19, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==You're missed already== | |||
| Please come back to the page, Maurreen. We'll either have an agreement soon, or we'll take a break as you suggested, so either way it will be over soon, and the changes, if any, will be minor. But they may loosen things up just a little, which I think you want too, so please stick with it just a tad longer. Best, ] 10:13, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, the latest news is that we appear to have reached an agreement. Jguk has agreed to allow a sentence to the effect that not all people are topics, because people might have lived in more than one country and so on, so it's now just a question of finding the right words, which I suspect will not take long. It's nowhere near as much as I wanted, but I'm prepared to take it. As for the EU thing, I am prepared to agree to that as an exchange, though you should have input too, and particularly about the OAS thing, as I'm not too bothered about that either way. But if you've really had enough, then don't feel you have to comment, because you'll drive yourself nuts otherwise. The OAS can always be added later, and the EU thing removed if you don't want it, so don't fret. It's only an encyclopedia after all! (Something I should tell myself too.) ;-) ] 10:45, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Wiki== | |||
| Oh, I meant not to announce it publicly before it's ready to start, in case the idea gets stolen. I didn't mean never to tell anyone, LOL. Otherwise it would be just you, me, and maybe my dog. We'd have fewer problems with styles of English, mind you. ] 08:33, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Journo wiki == | |||
| Thanks for the note, I think it's a good idea. Some possible content: | |||
| * AP Stylebook type stuff, but would be Creative Commons so could be printed and used all over | |||
| * Expanding on some existing content in Misplaced Pages, such as ] | |||
| * Expanding on Disinfopedia type content, such as a guide to newspapers and media groups, from Sulzburger to Scaife | |||
| * Case studies | |||
| This could be part of WikiCities, or could be a WikiBook, or another project altogether. Let me know what you think. ] | ] 17:21, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi. I don't know if this matters to you (and I apologize if it doesn't), but Jguk has recently been adding speedy notices to that page. Regards, ] 01:34, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Maurreen. Vacuum is a troll, as evidenced by the complete lack of useful contributions Vacuum has made (see ). He appears to be here only to stir up trouble. Kind regards, ] 06:56, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Maurreen. I completely agree with you about your right to keep the page. However, in the interest of not escalating matters, perhaps you should just let Jguk keep his speedy notice there until you reach a resolution. It's highly unlikely it'll actually get deleted, with the controversy, and if it is, you can just undelete it with your sysop powers. Thanks, ] 16:30, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Category:Wikipedians:Military== | |||
| Can you edit the "Category" page and give standards or qualifications that one can label oneself a "Wikipedian" military. Is it one who was in the military? Or only edits military articles? Or just likes the military? Can you give parameters for inclusion on the category page. Thanks. and whether I qualify, I might join it.] 18:31, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Got another question. I tried to put my name first like and then I tried just so that my name would list aphabetically. Is there something in the code that prevents just the listing by names in the category. Please let me know. Thanks.] 16:18, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Figured it out. Have the members type something similar to this: <nowiki>]</nowiki> and it shows up aphabetically. I forgot to use the "|" in the command code. ] 18:25, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Journawiki== | |||
| This is looking really good, Maurreen. Congratulations on pulling it together so fast; I'm impressed. Perhaps you or someone could write about it for Wikinews, which might attract people outside Misplaced Pages, and you could also try putting details on journalists' mailing lists and websites. I have a query for you about this sentence (regarding the liberation of Buchenwald): "At six o'clock that evening, the first American tank arrived, and behind it the Sixth Armored Division of the U.S. Third Army." Is this the right way to put it: the U.S. Third Army? In the source I took it from, it said "Third U.S. Army," which didn't sound right, but I'm not sure. ] 00:56, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks, Maurreen, that's very helpful. I'm going to take another look through Journawiki as soon as I get the time, probably tomorrow, and will look to see whether there's anything I can usefully add to it. You've done a great job. ] 03:39, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi Maurreen: Masterly edit of the Poetry form section. Good job! --] ] 08:56, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Splitting the difference== | |||
| Yeah, I thought so, too. Thanks. ] 05:46, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Category:Currency== | |||
| Are you aware there is already a ]? Either the two categories should be merged, or there should be a "See also" link each of the categories going to the other category. —] (]) 03:29, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thank you== | |||
| Hi Maurreen, this is to thank you for supporting me in my adminship nomination, which I appreciate very much. Best, ] 03:49, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I've just seen your March 5 note on ]... Took me some time, I know. Yes, this page is probably ready to be operational, although more feedback would have been nice. So... What do you say: should I (or we) take the plunge (remove the warning at the beginning of the page, add it to ], and place a notice on ]), or should I place another notice on ] and wait for more feedback? — ] (]) 15:44, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] ? == | |||
| The category you created yesterday, ], isn't that about the same stuff as ]? —] 11:45, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Accounting reform == | |||
| You changed the categorization of accounting reform from economics to accounting. But the article deals primarily with reforming the national accounts (GDP, National Disposable Income, etc.) and very little, if anything, with accounting. I think that economics is the proper category, but don't want to move it back without talking to you first. Maybe you know something I don't know.--] 04:18, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I wish I could help you, but the little economics I know I learned 15 years ago as a freshman in college. Maybe macroeconomics, since it generally deals with nations using something other than GDP to show the world how wonderful they are. (As you can tell, I'm not a fan.) But I'm an accountant, not an economist, so I'd have no real idea. Sorry.--] 04:52, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Refactoring an old discussion == | |||
| I've been so bold as to refactor the comments you made way back on ]. I'm thinking of reviving this proposal, in a new form, and I'd like the new talk page to be a ] zone. However, I'm aware this goes against ''de facto'' Wikiquette and I can't retroactively instate it, so if you find you don't agree with , please feel free to replace them with something better. ] 15:52, 2005 Apr 3 (UTC) | |||
| == Working together on Economics & Finance categories == | |||
| We discussed this a few weeks ago... I'm making progress on cleaning the Finance category... moving articles from the main cat to appropriate sub cats. I'll occasionally dump articles into the main Economics category, since that seems to be where you're working lately. I know you're trying to clean up that main cat, so I try to limit my dumping. Feel free to do the reverse... I'll keep cleaning things out of the main Finance cat, so don't worry about detailed subcategorization unless you want to. | |||
| ] 00:17, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Commas== | |||
| Hi, there. Sorry to hear (per your user page) that the wikistress is getting to you. I have a couple of questions: | |||
| #Your ] says that the CMS favors "year first." I'm assuming that's a typo for day first, which is what my 14th Ed. recommends (but I do remember hearing that they were planning to cave in and go with mmm dd, yyyy, in a later edition). | |||
| #Whenever I come across language like "] is the world ] capital," I have an uncontrollable urge to stick the misssing comma in. Am I being unnecessarily pedantic? Has usage overtaken me? (I sidestep the related question with "] declared itself the world ] capital on March 4, 2002 and has not looked back since" by using the dd mmm yyyy format, of course.) | |||
| If and when you have a moment. Thanks. ] 16:34, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for your reply. It's good to know I'm not the only one putting in those missing commas (and it's also reassuring to know that the CMS still advocates dd mmm yyyy: I have a soft spot for underdogs and lost causes). I'd suggest a note be added on the point to the relevant articles -- MoS commas section, city naming conventions -- as long as it's not going to set off another holy war ("''no one'' does it like that nowadays..." etc.) I see the MoS crowd have just found a new bone of contention, in the form of the capitalization rules for headers; dunno, professional deformation and all that, but sometimes you've just got to kowtow to house style, even though you don't like it. That, plus the fact that your time would be better spent writing articles instead of whinging. Cheers, ] 04:07, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Aboslutely. As you'll have seen in my comments above, I thought it was a formal/traditional/strict vs. informal/modern/sloppy question. I wasn't expecting UK vs. US to raise its head again, because I honestly don't believe that ''is'' the issue. ] 18:12, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Reviving Maintenance Collaboration of the Week == | |||
| == Misplaced Pages Manual of Style and Capitalization == | |||
| Hello! I'm interested in reviving the ] and noticed that you were a member. Would you be interested in helping to start this WikiProject up again? <span style="font-family:monospace;">'''] (]|])'''</span> 16:30, 20 June 2016 (UTC) | |||
| About a month ago I was trying to find out why the incorrect capitalization rule that is in the Manual of Style is there. So far nobody has responded to my requests to posts a citation from a manual of style support the Misplaced Pages rule. Today I went over onto the offensive over that matter. | |||
| ==] has been nominated for discussion== | |||
| I did an internet search and found a quote from the ''The United States Government Print Office Style Manual 2000'' and another quote in the ''Chicago Manual of Style'', 14th Ed. that support my position. I have therefore posted those quotes on the sub-page talk page and on the talk page of the main manual of style page. I have also found out which user put the 'rule' onto the site in the first place and challenged them to support what they wrote with a citation. I await the reply with interest. ] 17:47, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for merging to ]. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 13:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == David Helvarg == | |||
| == Category:Communication by region == | |||
| Hi Maurreen: I have just finished tinkering with the biography of a journalist ]. The stub was on VfD and I felt that he deserved better (even though I knew nothing of him then). This is the first time that I have written a biography of another journalist and I have been feeling my way (the other biographies of journalists seem too varied, and often inadequate, to be much help as exemplars). Could you please cast your informed eye over it and make appropriate improvements or comments before I submit it for ]? Thanks --] ] 21:49, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, I have nominated ] for speedy renaming to ]. – ] ''']'''] 08:48, 8 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Maurreen: I made the changes that you suggested and have listed the article on ]. Thank you very much for all your help. --] ] 10:51, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==] has been nominated for discussion== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 12:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Category:Journalism and Category:News trade == | |||
| ==] has been nominated for discussion== | |||
| ...are listed on WP:CFD under April 21. At least for me. Perhaps due to the new funky template thing, you need to reload or purge the page cache or something to get them to show up for you. -- ] 02:52, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 17:58, 24 August 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Ive reverted your edits to the news trade and journalism templates. Reason - Use articles not Categories, and most categoriees should have articles. Maybe you could write up something about ]. ] is a valid concept in journalism as a term of reference for non-Journalistic entities within the news trade. Why did you remove it? Business news likewise. And last but not least the comment "sometimes" is out of place for an article series template. Regards, -]|]| 09:02, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| ==Looking at Journalism Project== | |||
| Maurreen, thanks for doing good, sound, work on the "Journalism beat" here on WP. I've not worked on a "project" as such, but I'll look into it and posted some comments there at the Journalism Project. I'm not sure I understand what that is, but if it has to do with bringing some kind fo meta-organization to the overall heading "journalism" that that's a good idea. I hope it will be very neutral, factual and reflective of the normative standards extant in the industry...I'm sure with your eye on, it will go in that direction. Yours, ] 14:46, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Maurreen. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| == Serial comma == | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| A couple of users are trying to strike all guidance on the serial comma from the Manual of Style, saying they've reached a consensus to do so. Could you comment on the talk page? I know you've been involved in that in the past. I know there was a vote not so long ago where the majority opinion was to keep as is. Do you know where that's archived? ] 21:56, 2005 May 9 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| RE: My posting in the ]… | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/5&oldid=750543698 --> | |||
| :'':Your comments are well done. ] 07:23, 10 May 2005 (UTC)'' | |||
| ==] has been nominated for discussion== | |||
| Thanks, Maurreen. I thought they might have been somewhat overcooked myself. But I find useful discussion on this subject quite rare, and I long for a happy medium. ☺ I admire your patience and persistence in working on this meal prepared by far too many cooks. ] ] 08:01, 10 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 20:13, 14 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Queen Elizabeth II == | |||
| Please note that I have disputed the neutrality of ]. Jguk reverted my NPOV template, claiming that the NPOV dispute is just a personal campaign of one person. ] 08:58, 15 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Hackathon to help Misplaced Pages 1.0 == | ||
| Hi Maureen, I saw you chimed in helpfully on Jguk's spurious RfC against Whig. I'm not sure if you saw that Jguk created one on me also—mostly with the same free-floating semi-accusations. A few details differ, but I was wondering if you'd have time to chime in on my RfC with a similar comment to that you made on Whig's. It probably does't matter much, since the whole WP "gaming" is silly to start with... but just in case uninvolved editors happen upon it, another voice makes the situation more clear. All the best, ] | |||
| Hello! A voice from the past here! I hope you're doing well. WP1 has been fairly quiet, but is getting active again now. I thought you might be interested in on August 13-18 in my home town of ], right after . Let me know if you'd like to participate. It would be great to meet you in person! All the best, ] (]) 04:47, 1 May 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Looking for help on a major wiki project == | |||
| == Netherlands, (Dut/Hol) listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Netherlands, (Dut/Hol)'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 17:38, 22 May 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Misplaced Pages:MCW listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Misplaced Pages:MCW'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span> 23:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==Discussion at ]== | |||
| Hey :) I was wondering if you'd be interesting in helping out with www.Knowmore.org, a corporation search wiki we're trying to get off the ground. We could DEFINATELY use some people that know how to make a wiki community great & the site is almost a blank slate at this point. It's been heavily customized and is designed to help responsible consumers enter any product or company name and immediatly find information about that co. (the main focus of the wiki is corporate & political information in a much more specialized way then wikipedia currently offers) Let me know if you're interested! aim: knowmoreorg or bernard@knowmore.org | |||
| ]You are invited to join the discussion at ]. ] (]) 07:38, 6 October 2017 (UTC)<!-- ] --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2017 election voter message == | |||
| ==David Helvarg FAC== | |||
| You gave me some great help with ]. It has now been hugely rewritten and I would welcome your comments at ]. --] ] 15:39, 24 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Maurreen. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| == RfAr re: Styles == | |||
| Please see if you are interested. ] 09:54, 29 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == David Helvarg revisited == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for your polishing tweaks to ]. I think that it is now ready to go back to ]. --] ] 10:37, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=813406947 --> | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ==Theo RFA== | |||
| ] | |||
| And now thank you for your remarkably prompt support of my RFA nomination. I am astonished that you beat the nominator in entering your support. --] ] 09:42, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. | |||
| And now, thank you for your congratulations. I refuse to accept your apology for all the help that you gave me … I cannot accept anything so unneeded. This is a volunteer project: ''any'' help is a boon and I found your comments and changes to be valuable triggers. I hope to work with you again on something.—] ] 18:12, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> ] (]) 20:58, 7 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == lots of edits, not an admin == | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. Since you've been previously nominated I added an '*' immediately before your name in ]. If for any reason you're NOT interested, my apologies and please remove the '*' (you could entirely remove yourself from the list also, if you'd like). I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list. Thanks. -- ] <small>(])</small> 18:31, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 06:30, 26 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| == ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
| I have now reopened the notice board, if you are interested in contributing new topics, or in nominating articles for the Collaboration of the Week, which also received a revamp. Please post on the project's talk page if you show interest. ] 02:47, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Maurreen. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| ==Era proposal== | |||
| Well, I finally bit the bullet and wrote up an ]. Maybe you could offer some feedback if you get a chance. Cheers. ] 22:03, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == Re: News Trade == | |||
| Nothing personal against the author of the article, but, yes, I think ] should be VfDed. ] 16:04, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ==Military Parlance== | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=866998231 --> | |||
| ==] has been nominated for discussion== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 19:14, 10 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for your edits on this - it all helps! :) ] 21:30, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==] has been nominated for discussion== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 21:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :Keep editing Maurreen! :) ] 17:52, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == "George Washington between the wars" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''George Washington between the wars'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ]] 03:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ==] has been nominated for renaming== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''' has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 04:47, 24 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Category economics game theory == | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Maurreen - I've noticed that you are creating a category called economics game theory and moving some game theory articles there. Is there a reason why you are doing this? Game theory is already a sub-category of economics, why the name change? best, --] 18:11, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 22:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :Maurreen - Good you noticed that! I think probably the appropriate action would just be to remove the economics category from those pages and leave the game theory one. The reason I'm worried is that game theory is highly interdisciplinary (involving sociology, economics, biology, political science, and philosophy) and so I wouldn't want to mislead people by making a special category "economics game theory". Thanks for your quick response, and I'll try to keep my eye out for those duplicate categories! best, --] 18:22, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == "Liberal theology" listed at ] == | |||
| ] A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 21:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == "Outline of art" listed at ] == | |||
| ] A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 22:13, 13 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ==] has been nominated for merging== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''' has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. —] (]) 15:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Could you explain removing category economics == | |||
| ==] has been nominated for merging== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''' has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 18:24, 21 November 2021 (UTC) | |||
| You removed category economics from ] - why? ] 22:15, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| <table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
| I was wondering why you removed cat:geography from this article. ] 1 July 2005 13:20 (UTC) | |||
| <tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| I was wondering why you removed many articles from the geography category. Cheers, ] 1 July 2005 14:20 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small> | |||
| :Subcats. Ok. I think it's entirely reasonable for there to be a ] subcat. I'll assist to the degree I'm qualified. Cheers, ] 1 July 2005 23:27 (UTC) | |||
| </td></tr> | |||
| </table> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1056562944 --> | |||
| ==] has been nominated for renaming== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''' has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 09:04, 21 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Are You the Person I Need? == | |||
| == ] has been nominated for deletion == | |||
| *Hi! I see from watchlist you changed 'category' on ], to physical geology so are you a guru on categories? The Bo Hai is not really a sea, nor a Bay, though the article equates the two, misplacing the real bay, which is indeed part of the Bo Hai... itself a Gulf technically, or so I understand. To make matters even more confusing, I gather 'Hai' is indeed Chinese for 'Sea', making all clear as 'Mud'. <G> | |||
| *So what's your actual expertise — fixing a red link, or a real life geographer? Other? | |||
| **If you are a category guru or geography specialist, that's not the only place that 'invented at need' copycat category was posted that evening, so things should be adjusted, one way or another. | |||
| *I wanted (meant) to get a hold of someone on that issue, and did post a talk page note, as I copied the 'category type', as it were, while trying to straighten (criss-cross) geo-political references, but got diverted in an expansion or three or four during the week. | |||
| **In any case, there needs to be some category consistancy geo-region to geo-region, or so I would argue. Please advise. Thanks! | |||
| ::] || ] 3 July 2005 00:54 (UTC) | |||
| reply: | |||
| *The category you replaced: 'Bays of China', should, of course, be a sub-category of 'Geography of China'. I MODELED 'Bays of China' on another 'Bays of _______', category which I'd have to retrace to tell you what '________' was to be certain, but I think it was Australia. Perhaps the sub-category 'Bays of China' is one you should add under 'Geography of China', and revert your original change. Perhaps there is a 'Bays of the Pacific', or 'Bays of the World', but I don't know how to check. I am fairly new to Wiki. Hence, I was hoping you knew for sure which categories and subcategories were supposed to be under the project guidelines, and which were perhaps omitted or overlooked as categories by the people who were working China related things. | |||
| *What I do know for certain, is that there is a 'Bays of _________' category or subcategory, and I happened across it, so modeled 'Bays of China' on it, which gave a red link. | |||
| *To fix the redlink, one could fix the Bays of China by replacing it with 'Geography of China', but that might then be inconsistant with the other 'Bays of _________' I did see. So I was hoping you knew which way it was supposed to work, or at least '''who to ask'''. You would know that if someone had asked you to change my original, but not if you changed it when you saw it as a red link (on your own). | |||
| Thankyou for your time and answer. I hope that I made the small issue clear. My view is that 'Bays of China' is a proper sub-category of Geography of China, and should be added there; that of course means you should revert your change to the article as well. If not, the other two Bays on ] need changed as well. No matter what, at least two changes are needed. | |||
| *Please let me know what you decide and do. Thanks again. | |||
| ::] || ] 3 July 2005 06:28 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page. ] (]) 23:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ==] has been nominated for merging== | |||
| Hi. When you have a moment, would you please take a look at ]? Thanks. Hope you had a good holiday. ] 3 July 2005 10:24 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 05:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Jguk== | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| The temporary injunction is not listed, but as the case is closed, is no longer in effect anyway. ] July 3, 2005 18:51 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under ]. | |||
| == Project Journalism == | |||
| I'd like to make a simple template that would advertise the project which we can place on Talk pages of related articles. Do you know how to do that? The whole namespace thing is new to me and I don't want to make a mistake. It could say something like, "A new project on journalism is underway, participants needed" with link to project page. ] 5 July 2005 00:07 (UTC) | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 18:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{AIDvoter}} | |||
| ==] has been nominated for merging== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 12:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==] has been nominated for renaming== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 12:33, 9 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| ==] has been nominated for merging== | |||
| Come to my userpage!--] 6 July 2005 20:45 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 12:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==IDRIVE== | |||
| Thanks for offering your help on the Improvement Drive. It is still new enough for me to enjoy doing it. Right now, on the other hand, it looks like there might be an edit war coming up, because one user, SimonP,has ''removed'' all of the nomination templates on COTW and IDrive. I placed them all on the main page, according to a discussion on the COTW discussion page. (This was also done on COTW nominations.) Actually I came to the Collaboration pages because they seemed edit-war-free, but let's be optimistic, the problem may be solved in peace. Some people have set up a vote on whether the templates should go on the article page or the talk page, here: ]. | |||
| == CfD nomination at {{Section link|Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 15#X by ethnic or national origin}} == | |||
| Also, you voted for refugee, so you routinely get this template: | |||
| {{AIDvoter}} | |||
| --] 18:14, 10 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''{{Section link|Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 15#X by ethnic or national origin}}''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd mass notify--> Thank you. –] (]]) 22:38, 15 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Template designs == | |||
| ==] has been nominated for splitting== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 09:20, 7 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Maurreen. I'd really appreciate it if you could cast your eye over my ] and pass some comments. The main thing I'm after is whether you think that the organisation would be appropriate for a ] competition similar to the talk page one. I'm still trying to think of how to sort it all out (and am waiting until after the new template location page has done its business). Perhaps having separate polls for each category? ] ] 22:35, 10 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==] has been nominated for renaming== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 05:54, 15 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Vote! == | |||
| ==] has been nominated for renaming== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 06:01, 15 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| You've shown your opposition of ], but you didn't vote. Please do. ] ] 22:58, July 10, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==] has been nominated for renaming== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 02:00, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Units== | |||
| Thanks for letting me know. B. is an inveterate POV pusher about this issue, making only conversion edits to articles with no other input. He recently lost an adminship nomination because of it. Also, be careful when you read any descriptions he gives of situations or of other pages. He distorts and mispresents. If it's an issue you care about, check it out for yourself rather than relying on him. My position on this is that it should be up to the editors on the page to decide, except for science articles, where something might hinge on it. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 05:59, July 13, 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:00, 26 December 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Maurreen has not edited Misplaced Pages since 30 December 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Archives
- /archive 1, Sep-Oct 2004
- /archive 2, Nov 2004
- /archive 3, Dec 04 - Jan 05
- /archive 4, Aug 2005
- /archive 5, Jun 2006
- /archive 6, Aug 2006 ???
- /archive 7, Jun - Aug 2006
- /archive 8, Sep 2006 - 2009
- /archive 9, 2010 - 2015
Category:Trade organizations based in the United States has been nominated for discussion
Category:Trade organizations based in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 12:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Reviving Maintenance Collaboration of the Week
Hello! I'm interested in reviving the Misplaced Pages:Maintenance collaboration of the week and noticed that you were a member. Would you be interested in helping to start this WikiProject up again? Chickadee46 (talk|contribs) 16:30, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Category:Television personalities has been nominated for discussion
Category:Television personalities, which you created, has been nominated for merging to Category:Television people. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 13:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Category:Communication by region
Hi, I have nominated Category:Communication by region for speedy renaming to Category:Communications by region. – Fayenatic London 08:48, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Category:Journalism sourcing has been nominated for discussion
Category:Journalism sourcing, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:08, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Category:Value has been nominated for discussion
Category:Value, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:58, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Maurreen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Category:Financial institutions has been nominated for discussion
Category:Financial institutions, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:13, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Hackathon to help Misplaced Pages 1.0
Hello! A voice from the past here! I hope you're doing well. WP1 has been fairly quiet, but is getting active again now. I thought you might be interested in this Hackathon on August 13-18 in my home town of Potsdam, New York, right after Wikimania. Let me know if you'd like to participate. It would be great to meet you in person! All the best, Walkerma (talk) 04:47, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Netherlands, (Dut/Hol) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Netherlands, (Dut/Hol). Since you had some involvement with the Netherlands, (Dut/Hol) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 17:38, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:MCW listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Misplaced Pages:MCW. Since you had some involvement with the Misplaced Pages:MCW redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Killing_of_Patrick_Harman
You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Killing_of_Patrick_Harman. Zazpot (talk) 07:38, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Maurreen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Polk County Historical Markers
A tag has been placed on Category:Polk County Historical Markers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Outline of performing arts for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Outline of performing arts is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Outline of performing arts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robynthehode (talk) 06:30, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Maurreen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:McClatchy family (newspapers) has been nominated for discussion
Category:McClatchy family (newspapers), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:14, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Category:Journalism genres has been nominated for discussion
Category:Journalism genres, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 21:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
"George Washington between the wars" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect George Washington between the wars. Since you had some involvement with the George Washington between the wars redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesomeHwyh 03:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Category:Economics paradoxes has been nominated for renaming
Category:Economics paradoxes has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 04:47, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of List of American copy editors for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of American copy editors is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of American copy editors until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
"Liberal theology" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Liberal theology. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 9#Liberal theology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ItsPugle (talk) 21:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
"Outline of art" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Outline of art. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 13#Outline of art until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Interstellarity (talk) 22:13, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Category:Misplaced Pages geography work groups has been nominated for merging
Category:Misplaced Pages geography work groups has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —andrybak (talk) 15:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Category:Culture terminology has been nominated for merging
Category:Culture terminology has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jamzze (talk) 18:24, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Category:Sunken cities has been nominated for renaming
Category:Sunken cities has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:04, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Category:Misplaced Pages CD Selection-GAs has been nominated for deletion
Category:Misplaced Pages CD Selection-GAs has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Schierbecker (talk) 23:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Category:Newspapers of the Americas has been nominated for merging
Category:Newspapers of the Americas has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Communications by region
A tag has been placed on Category:Communications by region indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz 18:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:The New York Times sportswriters has been nominated for merging
Category:The New York Times sportswriters has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:The New York Times writers has been nominated for renaming
Category:The New York Times writers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:33, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:American journalists for national newspapers has been nominated for merging
Category:American journalists for national newspapers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:46, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 15 § X by ethnic or national origin
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 15 § X by ethnic or national origin on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:38, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Category:Critics employed by The New York Times has been nominated for splitting
Category:Critics employed by The New York Times has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 09:20, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Category:Pulitzer family (newspapers) has been nominated for renaming
Category:Pulitzer family (newspapers) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 05:54, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:Graham family (newspapers) has been nominated for renaming
Category:Graham family (newspapers) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 06:01, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:Pulitzer family (newspapers) has been nominated for renaming
Category:Pulitzer family (newspapers) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 02:00, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: