| Revision as of 01:26, 3 February 2008 editSeresin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,029 edits →/Workshop page format: new section← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 07:53, 15 January 2025 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,141,424 edits →The Signpost: 15 January 2025: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{NOINDEX}} |
| ⚫ |
{{User:Daniel/Icons}} |
|
|
|
{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class=" multicol" style="background:transparent; width:100%;" |
|
{{User:Daniel/Header}} |
|
|
|
| align="left" valign="top" style="border:0; font-size:95%; font-family: Segoe UI, Tahoma, sans serif; font-size: 95%;"| |
|
{{User talk:Daniel/Header}} |
|
|
|
__TOC__ |
|
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE. --> |
|
|
|
| width="360px" align="left" valign="top" style="border:solid #0581B5 1px; font-size:95%; padding: 3pt; background:white"| |
|
== Archives == |
|
|
⚫ |
{{User talk:Daniel/Archive}} |
|
This page was last archived on Saturday, February 2. The most recent comments can be found in ]. For a complete list of archives, please see ]. If you wish to leave me a new message, please click <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Cheers, ] (]) 11:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|} |
|
|
{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" class=" multicol" style="background:transparent; width:100%;" |
|
|
| align="left" valign="top" style="border:0;"| |
|
|
{{-}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Buccaneers–Eagles rivalry == |
|
==Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #13== |
|
|
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 13}} ♬♩ ] (<small>]</small>) 16:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not necessarily saying the article should have been kept, but I noticed your comment {{tq|The couple of keep-leaning comments, and the sources presented by said comments, were refuted by noting their lack of independence. Alvaldi's comment at 20:08 7 January 2025 is a nice summation of this.}} I think its worth noting that Alvaldi said to ''keep'' the article on the basis that there was enough independent, in-depth sources for notability (cited <small> (2024), (2009), (2003), (2003).</small>). There were a few other sources that were non-independent that were presented, but a good number of them were actually independent. ] (]) 03:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
== Worthington == |
|
|
|
:Yes I agree, but the two sentences are somewhat separate - the attempted refbombing of the debate, Alvaldi aside, were of sources that are "probably perfectly fine to use them in the article to source some facts, but as they are not independent sources so they do not help establish that the article passes WP:GNG which is needed for it not to be deleted" (to use Alvaldi's words). Josh and yourself showed a consensus that Alvaldi's sources were marginal, and Alvaldi (funnily enough, despite !voting keep) refuted the attempted refspam by KatoKungLee. Have to make this sentiment more obvious. Cheers, ] (]) 04:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
::PS: Happy to restore to draft for further work if so desired, anyone please let me know. Thanks, ] (]) 04:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
You didn't respond, so I was bold and recreated it in good faith. The previous deletion thing was not viewable, so I couldn't see why it was deleted previously. Not trying to step on any toes. --] (]) 16:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its 3am here and I was about to vote for deletion on this while typing my rationale, but I see that you've already closed it. If you think it would make a difference, I kindly request you to reopen it for a day. This XfD is very similar to ], which was taken to DRV and reopened. Subsequently, two editors were blocked. ] (]) 22:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
== /Workshop page format == |
|
|
|
:], STONEX was reopened because it was closed by a non-administrator (very different reason). I'll reopen it on the basis you're about to offer a contrarian view to the close (and the closed was based off no participation), please vote ASAP as it may be closed by anyone else. Thanks, ] (]) 22:24, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thank you for reopening it. I have made my comment and hope it makes a difference. By similar, I meant that the vague votes cast by the driveby voters were similar to those in StoneX. ] (]) 22:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Thanks for commenting so quickly — it removes the justification for my original no consensus close (no really significant participation since the last relist), so makes it a good decision to reopen. Cheers, ] (]) 23:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ''The Signpost'': 15 January 2025 == |
|
Hey Daniel. You said that the new format was requested by the arbitrators. As can be seen ], there is much opposition to the format. Is there/What is the process whereby we can request a change? Thanks. '''] | ]''' 01:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"><div style="column-count:2;"> {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2025-01-15}} </div><!--Volume 21, Issue 1--> <div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * ''']''' * ] * ] * ] (]) 07:53, 15 January 2025 (UTC) <!-- Sent via script (]) --></div></div> |
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Subscribe&oldid=1269316164 --> |