| Revision as of 02:57, 7 February 2008 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits Fork← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:50, 24 December 2018 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by Sofarrell5335 - "→Nomination of Drop Stop for deletion: " | ||
| (947 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| {| class="infobox" width="100px" | |||
| |- | |||
| !align="center"|]<br/>] | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| |} | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| __TOC__ | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| == Starting fresh == | |||
| Time to archive. -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 03:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ] (]) 13:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==Prominence== | |||
| I have nominated ] ] because it is an underhanded way to twist policy to suit one's own interpretation. Feel free to comment. - <font face="Verdana">] <sub>]</sub></font> 22:06, 30 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : I have. Thanks for that. Short of arguing it to death, what road would you suggest to solve the issue with ScienceApologist at both ] and ]? -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 22:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :: ] has many options, but I think these problems, and those related, have gotten to the point where mediation would probably be best. I suggest you work with the editors to create a request you all agree to. --] (]) 00:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Thanks for the constructive advice. Last time I tried a mediation I got burned by incivility. So forgive me if I am a bit cautious with that route. -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 01:34, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Yes, but I'm suggesting something slightly different that should avoid such problems. If you can all agree first to exactly what you want mediated, then you've already resolved the problem that you (and most others) encounter when trying mediation. --] (]) 01:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: I fail to see how that is any different from last time. I guess I want a response from other users besides you. -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 02:14, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Hello. We are trying to get help editing a page, is there a way to directly discuss. Thanks you so much. Kindest Regards and Merry Christmas, stephen <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:49, 24 December 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ==Categorical imperatives== | |||
| ==File source problem with File:Hay.jpg== | |||
| Hi Levine2112... Just wanted to let you know how much I appreciated your supportive comments over the last couple weeks regarding the whole "category:pseudoscience" thing on WP. And it looks like reason (as outlined in NPOV) may even prevail! -- at least, outside homeopathy, where lawlessless and chaos rule.... btw, speaking of 2112, have you heard the 1974-ish bootleg of ] in Cleveland? Damn fine show. cheers, ]<sup>(])</sup> 22:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| : You're welcome. It is much deserved. Have you considered adminship yet? I haven't heard the bootleg, but as you know I am a fan and now that I know it exists I shall track it down! -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 23:11, 30 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the ]. | |||
| ::I think you can find that boot on one of those ok-by-artists, live-recording Bittorrent sites like Trader's Den or Dime-A-Dozen. I discovered it by surfing around about ], whose songs the Beatles covered a bunch of; Rush does this crazy Zeppelin-esque cover of one of them. Adminhood: to the extent that I've decided to stick around and work to improve WP, sure; I guess I'm as qualified as anyone. No great rush though (totally unintended pun until I typed it :-) cheers, ]<sup>(])</sup> 03:48, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::P.S. Adminship is ''supposed'' to be not that big a deal, but in practice seems to have become an hours-consuming stressful "hazing"-type deal, which I'm not sure is really worth it... just to get a set of sysop tools that should ideally be available to all, yet hardly ever used. ("Ideal" is a long way off, of course.) I think that energy may be better spent editing at Citizendium. That site like a nice next step, and growing. best regards, ]<sup>(])</sup> 05:06, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Thanks for the info about the artist-friendly download sites. I am very sensitive to that as I have had friends lose their jobs as the record industry battled with pirates. And I hear you about adminship. I've seen it described as merely a software update. That said, I also feel that admins serve a greater purpose than policing. I feel they serve as interpreters of policies for the rest of the "civilian" editors because they are given a higher level of respect having earned their position. Generally, I agree with your perceptions into policy and therefore I feel that Misplaced Pages would be a better place with editors like you lending your view on policies to the hoi polloi. Whatever you decide to do, best of luck in all of your endeavors! -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 05:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> | |||
| ==Note== | |||
| Please refer to the ''']''' to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a . If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 14:16, 31 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Why did you move my comment? ] (]) 23:06, 30 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : Mine was in direct response to OrangeMarlin's and therefore I wanted mine to follow his. All I did is change your indentations for ease of ready. Feel free to change it back if it is an issue. -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 23:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :: It's ok. You didn't think I was responding to his challenge? ] (]) 23:20, 30 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::: I guess not. I will reread. -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 01:34, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691991546 --> | |||
| Please check the bottom of my talk page. ] (]) 21:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| And this ] (]) 21:16, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : Wow! Were you reported by someone originally? Sorry you had to go through that 8 minutes of confusion. -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 21:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :: It was a result of this. and the section below. There is also this, added to the policy page of NPOV, without any consensus or discussion on the talk page. | |||
| Please note. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:51, 31 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Article Probation (civility) == | |||
| The article ] is under article prohbation per ]. Editors making disruptive edits may be banned by an administrator from ] and related articles or project pages. Editors of such articles should be ''especially'' mindful of content policies, such as ], and interaction policies, such as ], ], ], and ]. Editors must be individually notified of article probation before being banned. All resulting blocks and bans shall be logged at ], and may be appealed to the ]. Your edit could be considered a violation of civility. ] (]) 17:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : What part? And considered by whom? -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 21:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :: Well, me, for one. And I just wanted to make sure you were aware of the terms of the probation. ] (]) 21:55, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::: What part do you think is not civil? -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 21:56, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::: "you are just trying to disrupt this process" - comment on the content, not the contributor. "This is disruptive to the process," would be acceptable. ] (]) 21:56, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: I will change to what you suggest. Considering what he was doing, do you think he was being disruptive? Consider ]. -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 21:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::: I think both of you are being disruptive. ] (]) 21:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::: How am I being disruptive? I am actively seeking dispute resolution and clarity while SA is muddying my attempts. Also, consider your comment about TDII's apology being "baseline". Was that not uncivil? -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 22:03, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::: You can't stop responding. Every minute of every day you are constantly proclaiming you are right and he is wrong. You edit war. | |||
| :::::::: No. If I had said "TDII sucks at apologzing" or "TDII's apology was insincere" then that would have be incivil. The fact of the matter was that the apology as presented was the baseline of apologies. It was not directed at the target of the personal attack, it was no where near the attack itself, he did not withdraw the attack, it was after substantial prompting and it was two words. He didn't go to his targets talk page to apologize, and he didn't say anything substantial about his apology. That's why it was baseline. I make no assumption about motive or skill in saying this - the edit itself was nothing more than a baseline apology. ] (]) 22:08, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::: First of all, you are now being extremely uncivil with me with your characterization of my editing habits. | |||
| ::::::::: Second, I maintain that when someone swallows their pride and apologizes, it is a big step and we should encourage such behavior. Belittling TDII's apology as "baseline" is uncivil in my eyes. -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 22:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notice== | |||
| The way notice works, if somebody gives notice, they are also accepting notice. There is no need for reciprocal notification. I expect that every active editor within the homeopathy articles is going to be on notice shortly. Hopefully behavior will improve and no bans will be called for. Happy editing, ] <sup>]</sup> 22:34, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == AN/I posting == | |||
| So you are aware and may respond, you have been mentioned in a posting about ScienceApologist at AN/I: ]. ] (]) 17:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] article probation notification == | |||
| You should be aware that Homeopathy and related articles are under probation - Editors making disruptive edits to these pages may be banned by an administrator from ] and related articles or project pages. Editors of such articles should be ''especially'' mindful of content policies, such as ], and interaction policies, such as ], ], ], and ]. Editors must be individually notified of article probation before being banned. All resulting blocks and bans shall be logged at ], and may be appealed to the ]. ] <small>]</small> 22:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Corrected _FD for ] == | |||
| Sorry, working at home on a dial-up connection through a sticky-keys-laden craptop. The corrected deletion nomination page can be found ]. - <font face="Verdana">] <sub>]</sub></font> 17:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Edting Special pages== | |||
| Can special pages be changed...by anyone?--] (]) 13:53, 3 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : See ]: ''Most of the content of these pages is automatically generated and cannot be edited. To suggest a change to the parts...'' -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 21:26, 4 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *What?--] (]) 23:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : Click on the ] link and read the opening paragraph. The answer seems to be "no". -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 23:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==New Shortcut== | |||
| You first introduced this policy to me. In my current holding pattern, I have created a link that I think you and others might find useful. ] Cheers. ] (]) 00:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Please do not wikistalk me== | |||
| You are obviously wikistalking me. I'd appreciate it if you did not. Thank you. ] (]) 03:05, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : I think I have to look up wiki guidelines about "stalking" but I'd like to note here that I have myself included SA's Talk in my watchlist during periods of what I considered contentious editting. I don't mean to imply that SA has ever accused ''me'' of stalking, or that Levine is or is not doing anything similar; I just want that on the record as a concerned party. And it wasn't SA but his pal Ronz who stalked me, in the sense of spamming my talk after I had explicitly renounced further attempts to resolve our differences by direct conversation, and after I had explicitly asked him not to (the wikiquette item I introduced and following RfC were never addressed, and dropped for inactivity); however, at the time it certainly seemed that SA and Ronz had their metaphorical probosci deeply ensconced in each other's morphological tori. ] (]) 20:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :: and note, if watching your opponents' talk pages is a component of stalking in this venue, then Ronz apprarently is watching this, he just complained at ]. Fruitlessly, I should think, as it appears nobody is willing to get in the middle. ] (]) 21:19, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::: I find PeterStJohn's language about SA and Ronz here extremely incendiary, and clearly intended as such. In short, flame bait of the worst kind. PeterStJohn may want to remove it. ] 23:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::: The "owner" of the Talk is welcome to remove it at his discretion. It may be removed as a result of an action from e.g. an RfC or an ANI. Meanwhile I'm standing by it and will defend myself at the Wikiquette or whatever open recourse any claimant seeks. ] (]) 23:34, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Addendum: I very definitely prefer open forums, such as a Wikiquette, to seeking help from allies individually, towards resolving disputes. I seek uninvolved 3rd parties. I don't expect to meet any but I seek them. ] (]) 23:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Note== | |||
| Just wanted to inform you about the section. ] (]) 03:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Fork == | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Chiropractic&diff=next&oldid=189391448 Time: 01:37, 6 February 2008 | |||
| I deleted the tagged orignal research and the POV material. | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Scientific_inquiries_into_chiropractic_care&diff=next&oldid=189335743 Time: 01:15, 6 February 2008 | |||
| Your next step was commenting on the talk page about POV Forks of a new article. You were fully aware of the POV fork policy. | |||
| There was a discussion for the new article and consensus was achieved. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Chiropractic#Too_long.21 | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Scientific_inquiries_into_chiropractic_care&diff=prev&oldid=189411284 Time: 02:27, 6 February 2008 | |||
| However, you forked the disputed material to another article without discussion or an edit summary. This goes against Misplaced Pages policy and by extention may also be in violation of the probation. | |||
| See ]: A '''point of view (POV) fork''' is a content fork deliberately created to avoid ] guidelines, often to avoid or highlight negative or positive viewpoints or facts. Both content forks and POV forks are undesirable on Misplaced Pages, as they avoid consensus building and violate one of our most important policies. | |||
| You have not gained the consensus of the community to fork POV material to another article. Regards, ] ] 02:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:50, 24 December 2018
Nomination of Drop Stop for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drop Stop is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Drop Stop until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Plushy (talk) 13:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello. We are trying to get help editing a page, is there a way to directly discuss. Thanks you so much. Kindest Regards and Merry Christmas, stephen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sofarrell5335 (talk • contribs) 12:49, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Hay.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Hay.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:16, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)