| Revision as of 17:01, 8 February 2008 view sourceMike0001 (talk | contribs)593 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:05, 18 December 2024 view source Z1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,124 edits Undid revision 1263797244 by Z1720 (talk) Not neededTags: Replaced Undo | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{Usertalksuper}} | |||
| {{TOCright}}{{archive box|image=]|auto=yes|width=150px}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 200K | |||
| |counter = 3 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 0 | |||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
| |algo = old(3d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:Collectonian/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| I prefer to reply to comments on the page they were left, so if I left a comment on your page, reply there it is on my watch list. If you leave a comment here, watch this page until the discussion is done as I will only leave replies here. '''Comments which I find to be ], full of ]ities, an attempt flame baiting, or that are are excessively rude may be deleted without response.''' If I choose not to answer, that's my right, don't keep putting it back. I'll just delete and get annoyed at you. I'm something of a neat freak, so I regularly ] items from my talk page when the discussion is resolved or closed, hence the archive box over there. ->> | |||
| Are you hear about an edit I made? You may want to check my ] first to get some general info on ] about edits I make. Here are some quick links as well: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| <!-- Comments go below here! --> | |||
| == Re: InuYasha and Date Formats == | |||
| That's the thing, I've also seen it both ways. I noticed that the dates given at ''InuYasha'' were formatted UK style and an entire section was Americanized. What to do? Since the majority of the dates were already in UK style I just went along with it. ] <small>(] • ])</small> 03:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Good question, really. I've seen it both ways in some articles, and being rather regional, I tend to go for Americanized. I personally only use UK style in articles on UK shows. ~scrounges around in the MOS ~ Okay, it looks like either can be used for the article, so long as its consistent. The only main requirement is that for US-centric articles, the americanized should be used, while UK ones should use the "international" format. :) ] (]) 03:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::How does Canada style the dates? I ask this because the English dub is from there. ] <small>(] • ])</small> 04:21, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::According to the MOS, Canada uses both equally, so either is acceptable. ] (]) 04:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::We might have to keep an eye on {{user3|Snapper2}}. I'm not sure what his deal is, but he's almost breaking ] on Naruto's page. ] <small>(] • ])</small> 05:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Yes, I've noticed. He is a relatively new editor, so I've been fairly lenient, but if he keeps it up I'll send him a warning as well. ] (]) 05:30, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::. '''''~]]]''''' 05:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Hmmm...sorry about that, I presumed you were new because of your actions, but since you are not then you do not need to be told, again, that your edits are not appropriate. For future reference, if multiple editors undo a change you make, you should not just keep making redoing it. Rather, bring the issue up on the talk page and discuss your point of view there. In the case of these edits, I could agree that the part "According to Viz" can be removed if Viz is only the publisher of the cited work, however the excessive wikification is completely unnecessary. Repeated wikifications are unnecessary and would only be required to be removed when we take the article up for FA status. If you continue to just revert the changes, you will violate 3RR and be subject to blocking. ] (]) 05:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::Other editors reverted me with the explanation of adding unneeded wikification, which I was not doing on the whole; the only link I added was one that Sesshomaru removed when he reverted me, and I in turn reverted him. It was not but negligence on my part. Even then, to again quote ], "It is not uncommon to repeat a link that had last appeared much earlier in the article." Links, present or not, are not going to be the downfall of an article. '''''~]]]''''' 05:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::You sure act like a new editor. Otherwise, you'd know better than to edit war and . Just open up a discussion on the article's talk page if you still disagree with the edits. ] <small>(] • ])</small> 05:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Collectonian, can you take a look at ]? I would like to solve the problems brought up by Snapper2 on Naruto's page. ] <small>(] • ])</small> 23:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I'll go ahead and get Naruto Uzumaki updated per the talk. No one (aside from you and I) commented on the matter and frankly I don't believe anyone else bothers. ] <small>(] • ])</small> 07:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I've noticed that seems to happen a lot...someone will complain, but then in the end only one or two people really care enough to do anything. Funny thing is, I don't even watch the show :P ] (]) 07:49, 8 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Really? I think people who particularly like anime or manga should. {^_^} Well, actually, if you were at one time a ''Dragon Ball'' supporter then the show is right for you. Anyways, I'll get the changes done. Thanks for your support, ] <small>(] • ])</small> 08:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::LOL, never could get into Dragon Ball either. Kinda ironic because it is the only anime my younger brother likes! :P ] (]) 14:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Expert for ] == | |||
| Actually, it already has the attention of one -- if I count. I've been working on the page over the past month. At the rate I work -- and the rate I watch episodes for summarizing -- I have a couple more weeks left of cleanup. —] (]) 14:27, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :LOL, sorry. I wasn't checking the history, just kinda quick hitting while adding in the ADV manga to the categories. Feel free to remove the tag. I think after I tagged I saw another one you were working on too? ] (]) 15:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :: If so, I haven't noticed. I does need cleanup, which is what I've been working on, but I'll remove the expert attention tag. —] (]) 15:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Good luck. I'm still trying to smack around Fushigi Yugi while also working on Marmalade Boy. I still have 6 summaries to write up. :P ] (]) 15:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Yeah, I kinda slowed down once I made a personal pledge to whack one article from the project cleanup list a week. This week, it's the list of Black Cat volumes/chapters (which has a couple paragraphs of summary ''per chapter'' -- oy). —] (]) 17:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I'm trying to get myself to focus more too, cause I'm finding I don't get much done when I'm letting myself get pulled into multiple articles at once. :P ] (]) 18:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::: Yeah, that. BTW, I moved the cleanup tag to ] -- a split I should have done earlier, but I was waiting to finish filling out the episode lists -- because most of the cleanup issues seem to be associated with that. With the honking big tables out of the way, the main article is, I think actually pretty much a B-class article -- even has a decent start on a Reception section. —] (]) 14:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Cool! I saw that earlier. Definitely needed it. I wouldn't say it was ready for B class though. The character list could, and probably should, be broken out, the anime section has a list that should be prose, and there is a stub section. :P ] (]) 15:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::: Hmm. We must be reading the qualifications for B differently. Those are enough for me to say "don't bother trying for GA yet, but it's getting there, so B." —] (]) 20:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::Possibly...I tend to take a much stricter view of what should be B and up than most, though it also seems to go by project. Film is very tough on assessments, while TV, not so much. ] (]) 20:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ''Fushigi Yūgi'' and romanization == | |||
| I did what I could for the romanization on both pages, though I have some reservations about the episode list; I'd feel better about it if I had the series to check against, as kana readings for more obscure combinations are hard to come by. In particluar, the "星見" in episode 26's title ''could'' be "Hoshimi", but the first thing the online dictionary I use gave me was a name and not a deinfition, so I don't know if that's accurate. The four ''Eikoden'' titles also has similar problems, so I simply cut them. <span style="font-family: serif">—], '']''</span> 03:03, 7 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks, it is much appreciated :) ] (]) 03:05, 7 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Rough Collie|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''Your continued attempts to add the image after it was explained to you repeatedly why it was not appropriate, is not acceptable. Your are blatantly violating Misplaced Pages policy and refusing to accept that the image of your dog does not belong in the article at this time. I explained why multiple times, but you just keep stubbornly trying to shove it in. If you readd it again after this warning, you will be reported for violating the 3RR rule.'' ] (]) 17:01, 8 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:05, 18 December 2024
Redirect to: