Revision as of 10:13, 11 February 2008 editDevadaru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users659 edits →Vivekananda and Ayyavazhi: thanks← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:50, 30 June 2012 edit undoOxfordwang (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers5,436 editsm Reverted edits by 151.151.109.8 (talk) identified as personal attack on another user (HG) | ||
(202 intermediate revisions by 51 users not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
: Nov 7th - Dec 4th; | : Nov 7th - Dec 4th; | ||
: Dec 5th 2006 - 21st October 2007; | : Dec 5th 2006 - 21st October 2007; | ||
:Till Feb 29th 2008; | |||
:Till April 15th 2008; | |||
:Till June 20th 2008; | |||
:Till August 5th 2008; | |||
:Till October 20th 2008; | |||
: Till November 25th 2009; | |||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ||
== Welcome back == | |||
==]== | |||
This arbitration case has closed and the final decision can be found at the link above. ] is subject to a comprehensive editing restriction for one year. He is limited to one revert per page per week (excepting obvious vandalism), and is required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page. If he exceeds this limit, fails to discuss a content reversion, or makes any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he may be blocked as set forth in the decision's enforcement provision. This notice is given by a Clerk on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. ] 19:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
==]== | |||
In view of your contributions to ], ] may benefit from your input. Please consider participating in that discussion. -- ]]/] 06:29, 21 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==]== | |||
Did you look at the page in question? "Hostile" is not my personal opinion. My PERSONAL opinion is "vicious" and "nasty". And I'm an agnostic. I imagine an actual Catholic would be really offended. "Hostile" is a fair and impartial assessment of the page. Or "antagonistic". Please have a look for yourself. External links out of Misplaced Pages don't normally present a point of view so opposed to the page it is linking from. Not in my experience anyway. Is there a non-controversial, recommended method for identifying a link of this kind? Thanks. | |||
] (]) 16:11, 9 December 2007 (UTC) (in Toronto) | |||
== ] == | |||
I notice you've reverted the changes I'd made to this article. The article is currently under consideration for ] and, as I said in my edit summary, the changes were intended to meet concerns raised in ]. It seemed to me that the concerns raised there required a rewrite of the article, which I attempted to do. Would you please mind discussing precisely what your concerns with the changes were? -- ] (]) 11:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Carnatic Music == | |||
Hello Bharatveer | |||
I agree with your earlier comments | |||
"Parthy, I reverted because i felt it was a simple case of tamil pov pushing( inserting tamil font in front of kannada and some childish remarks regarding vedic infuence etc ). | |||
+ It is none of your business to ask me to spend time on this article. Hope you stop this sort of unfriendly acts. ] 08:08, 26 July 2006 (UTC)" | |||
I have same opinion and trying to fix it though getting reverted again and again. I have tried one more time. | |||
Hi BV, | |||
Knataka | |||
Welcome back. Hope you'll have a constructive time here. All the best. --] (]) 07:22, 25 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
:You are most welcome. --] (]) 17:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Indian religions == | |||
Bharatveer, I've noted your good edits on the ] page. Trouble is, there is a Jain cleric called AnishShah19, who is vandalizing there saying Jainism evolved alongside the 1500 BC Vedic age, and also that Jainism is as old as Indus Valley civilization. He goes on to give a dozen speculative sources and tries to pass them off as confirmed accepted fact. | |||
==] nomination of ]== | |||
I would request your help there in reversion of his edits and arguments in the talk page (if possible, as it is huge by now). Just try if you find time and patience. Thanx. ] (]) 16:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
] A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please ], as well as our subject-specific ]. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the ]. | |||
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that they ] the page or have a copy emailed to you.<!-- Template:Db-bio-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 09:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Vivekananda and Ayyavazhi == | |||
== Romila Thapar == | |||
Hello Bharatveer, | |||
Tomorrow - I promise! --] <small>(])</small> 02:58, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
I noticed that there have been frequent inclusions and then subsequent deletions (by you) of the material relating to Swami Vivekananda and Ayyavazhi. It looks like the Ayyavazhi editors will continue to restore your deletions. (And you no doubt will continue to delete them!) I wonder if a solution could be found by including that material on one of the Ayyavazhi pages. Perhaps a short note on the Vivekananda page could direct to the new location. (I also mentioned this to the last reverter). | |||
== Note == | |||
] (]) 03:53, 9 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Please see ]. ] (]) 11:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
Thanks. Looks like Paul Raj is also satisfied now. | |||
You've been banned by the Misplaced Pages community. If you'd like to edit again, you may appeal. Please contact ] if you'd like your situation reviewed. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 10:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 03:50, 30 June 2012
Welcome!
Archive 1: February 2006 - May 2006 ; Archive2 : June 2006 - July 2006 ; Archive3 : Aug 1st,2006 - Aug 9th,2006 ; Archive4 : Aug 10th 2006 - Aug 31st 2006; Archive5 : Sept 1st 2006 - Sept 12th 2006; Archive6 : Sept 13th -Nov 6th; Archive7 : Nov 7th - Dec 4th; Archive8 : Dec 5th 2006 - 21st October 2007; Archive9 :Till Feb 29th 2008; Archive10 :Till April 15th 2008; Archive11 :Till June 20th 2008; Archive12 :Till August 5th 2008; Archive13:Till October 20th 2008; Archive14: Till November 25th 2009;
Welcome back
Hi BV, Welcome back. Hope you'll have a constructive time here. All the best. --Ragib (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- You are most welcome. --Ragib (talk) 17:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Heather Ellis
A tag has been placed on Heather Ellis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 09:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Romila Thapar
Tomorrow - I promise! --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 02:58, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Note
Please see WP:AN#Community ban for Bharatveer. Moreschi (talk) 11:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
You've been banned by the Misplaced Pages community. If you'd like to edit again, you may appeal. Please contact the Arbitration Committee if you'd like your situation reviewed. Jehochman 20:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)