Misplaced Pages

:Guide to administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:38, 11 February 2008 editKeilana (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators59,299 editsm Reverted edits by Mike0001 (talk) to last version by Dycedarg← Previous edit Latest revision as of 08:52, 2 October 2023 edit undo1.47.89.100 (talk) →When reporting at AIV is not appropriate 
(61 intermediate revisions by 48 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Wikimedia help page}}
{{editabuselinks}}
<noinclude>{{Misplaced Pages how-to|WP:GAIAV|WP:GAIV|sort-by=Administrator intervention against vandalism, Guide to}}</noinclude>
{{WikipediaVandalism}}
{{Noticeboard links}}
⚫ '''This is a guide to reporting users to ]''' (shortcuts ] and ]). This guide is intended to prevent invalid reports that needlessly take ]s' time, thereby allowing vandals more time to cause havoc before being ].
{{Misplaced Pages vandalism}}

⚫ '''This is a guide to reporting users to ]''' (shortcuts: ], and ]). This guide is intended to prevent invalid reports that needlessly take up ]s' time, thereby allowing vandals more time to cause havoc before being ].


==What to report== ==What to report==
First, read the policy at ]. Administrator intervention against vandalism is for reporting users ''currently'' engaging in persistent vandalism. See the section "]" for handling common incidents that should not be reported here. First, read the policy at ] and ]. Administrator intervention against vandalism is for reporting users ''currently engaging in persistent, clear vandalism or spamming''. See the section "]" for handling common incidents that should not be reported here.


Report only clear violations that do not require discussion or detailed explanations. If there is a reasonable chance that something may ''not'' be vandalism, it probably should be reported elsewhere, or not at all. Report only clear violations that do not require discussion or detailed explanations. If there is a reasonable chance that something may ''not'' be vandalism, it probably should be reported elsewhere, or not at all.


==When to report== ==When to report==
Vandals should '''always''' receive enough ] before being reported. What constitutes "enough" is left to your best judgment. Consider the user's past edits, warnings and blocks, the severity of their offense, the likelihood that their edit(s) could have been made in error or otherwise in ], and the type of user in question (IP addresses may be shared or dynamic, and old warnings could be irrelevant to the current situation). Vandals should '''always''' receive enough ] before being reported unless they are ]. What constitutes "enough" is left to your best judgment. Consider the user's past edits, warnings and blocks, the severity of their offense, the likelihood that their edit(s) could have been made in error or otherwise in ], and the type of user in question (IP addresses may be shared or dynamic, and old warnings could be irrelevant to the current situation).


Blocking is meant to be preventive, not punitive. Therefore, the user must show a strong likelihood of making further disruptive edits despite warnings and being informed of the blocking policy. Always give a final warning, and report only if the vandal has vandalized at least once '''after''' that. (A final warning is a "level 4" warning, usually {{tl|uw-vandalism4}} or, in more extreme cases, {{tl|uw-vandalism4im}}.) Administrators are likely to remove your report if they feel that the vandal has been insufficiently warned or has stopped after the final warning. ] is meant to be preventive, not punitive. Therefore, the user must show a strong likelihood of making further disruptive edits despite warnings and being informed of the blocking policy. Always give a final warning, and report only if the vandal has vandalized at least once '''after''' that. (A final warning is a "level 4" warning, usually {{tl|uw-vandalism4}} or, in more extreme cases, {{tl|uw-vandalism4im}}.) Administrators are likely to remove your report if they feel that the vandal has been insufficiently warned or has stopped after the final warning.


==How to report a user to AIV== ==How to report a user to AIV==
All reports should be placed at the bottom of the "User-reported" section of ], using one of the formats described below. One easy way to do this and to avoid edit conflicts is to use the "+" link, which appears to the right of "edit this page" in the tabs across the top of the page (in the default skin). Just leave the "Subject/headline" field blank, and place your report in the big empty text box; it will automatically be appended to the end of the page. All reports should be placed at the bottom of the "User-reported" section of ], using one of the formats described below.


===Accounts=== ===Accounts===
To report a user, you should use the {{tl|vandal}} template. Your report should look something like: <br /> To report a user, you should use the {{tl|vandal}} template. Your report should look something like: <br />
<code><nowiki>*{{vandal|Example user}} concise reason eg vandalised past 4th warning. ~~~~</nowiki></code><br /> <code><nowiki>*{{vandal|Example user}} concise reason e.g. vandalised past 4th warning. ~~~~</nowiki></code><br />
This will appear as This will appear as
*{{vandal|Example user}} concise reason e.g. vandalised past 4th warning. <font face="comic sans ms" color="#454545">]</font><sup>]</font></sup> 13:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC) *{{vandal|Example user}} concise reason e.g. vandalised past 4th warning. ]] 13:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)


<small>Minor caveat: if the username has an equals sign '''(=)''' in it, you'll need to use <code><nowiki>{{vandal|1=Username}}</nowiki></code>. Don't worry too much about broken reports, though!</small> <small>Minor caveat: if the username has an equals sign '''(=)''' in it, you'll need to use <code><nowiki>{{vandal|1=Username}}</nowiki></code>. Don't worry too much about broken reports, though!</small>


===Anonymous users / IP addresses=== ===IP addresses===
Anonymous users' contributions are logged by their ]es so they may be traced to check whether it is a shared IP (for example, a school). Reporting is the same, except with a different template ({{tl|IPvandal}}) that has a few extra links:<br /> Unregistered users' contributions are logged by their ]es so they may be traced to check whether it is a shared IP (for example, a school). Reporting is the same, except with a different template ({{tl|IPvandal}}) that has a few extra links:<br />
<code><nowiki>*{{IPvandal|127.0.0.1}} concise reason e.g. vandalised past 4th warning. ~~~~</nowiki></code><br /> <code><nowiki>*{{IPvandal|127.0.0.1}} concise reason e.g. vandalised past 4th warning. ~~~~</nowiki></code><br />
Which will appear as Which will appear as
*{{IPvandal|127.0.0.1}} concise reason e.g. vandalised past 4th warning. <font face="comic sans ms" color="#454545">]</font><sup>]</font></sup> 13:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC) *{{IPvandal|127.0.0.1}} concise reason e.g. vandalised past 4th warning. ]] 13:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)


==When reporting at AIV is not appropriate== ==When reporting at AIV is not appropriate==
*Any vandal who hasn't been warned properly should not be reported. *Any vandal who hasn't been warned properly should not be reported, except for egregious cases.
*Violations of the ] should be reported to ] *Violations of the ] should be reported to ]
*If you suspect someone of ], file a report at ]. Obvious and malicious sockpuppets may be reported to AIV. A link to the sockpuppetry report should be included in the reason for reporting. *If you suspect someone of ], file a report at ]. Obvious and malicious sockpuppets engaging in vandalism may be reported to AIV. A link to the sockpuppetry report should be included in the reason for reporting.
*Usernames that clearly violate of ] should be reported at ]. *Usernames that clearly violate ] should be reported at ].
*Do not report edit wars or other disruptive behavior that doesn't fit the description at ]. These can instead be reported to the ] or its ]. AIV deals mainly with obviously malicious edits that require no discussion; complex cases should usually be referred to other boards. *Do not report edit wars or other disruptive behavior that doesn't fit the description at ]. These can instead be reported to the ] or its ]. AIV deals mainly with obviously malicious edits that require no discussion; complex cases should usually be referred to other boards.


==Why hasn't the user or IP address I reported been blocked?== ==Why hasn't the user or IP address I reported been blocked?==
Line 44: Line 47:
*If it is an IP address, it may be shared; blocking could affect many users at once. Administrators are reluctant to block such IPs because doing so may cause ], especially in the case of ]. *If it is an IP address, it may be shared; blocking could affect many users at once. Administrators are reluctant to block such IPs because doing so may cause ], especially in the case of ].
*You haven't used the appropriate template, and the bots removed the report as a comment. *You haven't used the appropriate template, and the bots removed the report as a comment.
Also:
*If administrators don't act on reports within 4-8 hours, the reports are considered stale and are removed. If this happens you'll need to resubmit your report.


==See also==
* ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 08:52, 2 October 2023

Wikimedia help page
This help page is a how-to guide.
It explains concepts or processes used by the Misplaced Pages community. It is not one of Misplaced Pages's policies or guidelines, and may reflect varying levels of consensus.		Shortcuts
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Vandalism
    Dealing with vandalism
    Resources and assistance
    Further information

    This is a guide to reporting users to Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism (shortcuts: WP:AIAV, and WP:AIV). This guide is intended to prevent invalid reports that needlessly take up administrators' time, thereby allowing vandals more time to cause havoc before being blocked.

    What to report

    First, read the policy at Misplaced Pages:Vandalism and Misplaced Pages:Spam. Administrator intervention against vandalism is for reporting users currently engaging in persistent, clear vandalism or spamming. See the section "When reporting at AIV is not appropriate" for handling common incidents that should not be reported here.

    Report only clear violations that do not require discussion or detailed explanations. If there is a reasonable chance that something may not be vandalism, it probably should be reported elsewhere, or not at all.

    When to report

    Vandals should always receive enough warnings before being reported unless they are vandalism-only accounts. What constitutes "enough" is left to your best judgment. Consider the user's past edits, warnings and blocks, the severity of their offense, the likelihood that their edit(s) could have been made in error or otherwise in good faith, and the type of user in question (IP addresses may be shared or dynamic, and old warnings could be irrelevant to the current situation).

    Blocking is meant to be preventive, not punitive. Therefore, the user must show a strong likelihood of making further disruptive edits despite warnings and being informed of the blocking policy. Always give a final warning, and report only if the vandal has vandalized at least once after that. (A final warning is a "level 4" warning, usually {{uw-vandalism4}} or, in more extreme cases, {{uw-vandalism4im}}.) Administrators are likely to remove your report if they feel that the vandal has been insufficiently warned or has stopped after the final warning.

    How to report a user to AIV

    All reports should be placed at the bottom of the "User-reported" section of Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism, using one of the formats described below.

    Accounts

    To report a user, you should use the {{vandal}} template. Your report should look something like:
    *{{vandal|Example user}} concise reason e.g. vandalised past 4th warning. ~~~~
    This will appear as

    Minor caveat: if the username has an equals sign (=) in it, you'll need to use {{vandal|1=Username}}. Don't worry too much about broken reports, though!

    IP addresses

    Unregistered users' contributions are logged by their IP addresses so they may be traced to check whether it is a shared IP (for example, a school). Reporting is the same, except with a different template ({{IPvandal}}) that has a few extra links:
    *{{IPvandal|127.0.0.1}} concise reason e.g. vandalised past 4th warning. ~~~~
    Which will appear as

    When reporting at AIV is not appropriate

    Why hasn't the user or IP address I reported been blocked?

    If you reported a user or IP address to administrator intervention against vandalism and they weren't blocked, you should first check the page history; most administrators explain in their edit summary why they are removing an entry without blocking it. If no reason is given, you can (politely!) ask the administrator who removed the report from the page. Some of the more common reasons are listed below:

    • The user hasn't been warned sufficiently.
    • The user stopped making malicious edits since the final warning, especially if it was an IP address.
    • The administrator deems the warnings inappropriate—for example, in the case of a content dispute.
    • If it is an IP address, it may be shared; blocking could affect many users at once. Administrators are reluctant to block such IPs because doing so may cause collateral damage, especially in the case of sensitive IP addresses.
    • You haven't used the appropriate template, and the bots removed the report as a comment.

    Also:

    • If administrators don't act on reports within 4-8 hours, the reports are considered stale and are removed. If this happens you'll need to resubmit your report.

    See also

    Category: