| Revision as of 16:51, 11 February 2008 editCallmebc (talk | contribs)1,692 edits →Killian Documents: Request for GW comment← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 03:37, 18 October 2023 edit undoDonner60 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers236,025 edits not around since July 2013 |
| (496 intermediate revisions by 62 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{not around|3=24 July 2013}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|algo = old(60d) |
|
|algo = old(60d) |
|
|archive = User talk:Jc-S0CO/Archives/%(year)d/%(month)s |
|
|archive = User talk:Jc-S0CO/Archives/%(year)d/%(month)s |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
<center> |
|
{| align="center" style="width: 85%; cellpadding=10 cellspacing=8; background-color: #E9F5FF; border: 1px solid #3A392C; vertical-align: top; border-right-width:4px; border-bottom-width:4px; rowspan=3 vertical-align: top;" |
|
|
|
{| border=1 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
<center>'''<font color="red">NOTICE:</font> If you leave a message on this page, I will reply on this page. If I left a message on your ], please reply there and I will get back to you whenever I can.'''</center> |
|
<center>'''<font color="red">NOTICE:</font> If you leave a message on this page, I will reply on this page.<br/>If I left a message on your ], please reply there and I will get back to you whenever I can.'''</center> |
|
|
|}</center><br> |
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
== Source for the section in "Movement to impeach George W. Bush" == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. We're into the last five days of the ]. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! |
|
Oh I know it was, it's on a lot of websites, the information is freely distributed. I know of the nightweed website, I sent her a few messages regarding current issues. I won't be putting it back on the article for impeaching bush because another person made a good point why it shouldn't be there. It's because it is more like regular evidence, rather than a direct impeachable offense. It may be on a different wikipedia article, but one that it fits with better. ] (]) 20:58, 24 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=WiR_list_2&oldid=812113507 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ''The Bugle'': Issue 207, July 2023 == |
|
== WP:FILMS Welcome == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="width: 100%;" |
|
<div style="border: 2px solid black; background: black; background-color:lightgreen; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 90%"> |
|
|
<div style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">'''Welcome!'''</div> |
|
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" | |
|
|
{| |
|
] |
|
|
|
| ] |
|
Hey, welcome to ]! We're a group of editors working to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of films and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{tl|User WikiProject Films}} to your user page. |
|
|
|
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div> |
|
|
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> |
|
|
* Project news: '']'' |
|
|
* Articles: '']'' |
|
|
* Book review: '']'' |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|} |
|
|
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;"> |
|
|
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 19:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1162117336 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ''The Bugle'': Issue 208, August 2023 == |
|
A few features that you might find helpful: |
|
|
* Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's ]; it is highly recommended that you . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="width: 100%;" |
|
* The project has a ]. The newsletter for November has been ]. December's issue is ''currently in production''; it will be delivered as a link, but ] are available. |
|
|
|
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" | |
|
|
|
|
|
{| |
|
There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like: |
|
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div> |
|
|
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> |
|
|
* Project news: '']'' |
|
|
* Articles: '']'' |
|
|
* Book review: '']'' |
|
|
* Op-ed: '']'' |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|} |
|
|
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;"> |
|
|
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 11:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1166489155 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ''The Bugle'': Issue 209, September 2023 == |
|
* Want to jump right into editing? The ] show things you should include. |
|
|
* Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the ] to see how you can help. |
|
|
* Want to know how good our articles are? Our ] has rated the quality of ''every'' film article in Misplaced Pages. Check it out! |
|
|
* Want to collaborate on articles? The ] picks an article every week to work on together. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="width: 100%;" |
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask ], and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! ] (]) 08:47, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" | |
|
|
{| |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div> |
|
|
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> |
|
|
* Project news: '']'' |
|
|
* Articles: '']'' |
|
|
* Book review: '']'' |
|
|
* Op-ed: '']'' |
|
</div> |
|
</div> |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|} |
|
|
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;"> |
|
|
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 21:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1174199736 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ''The Bugle'': Issue 210, October 2023 == |
|
== WikiProject Films ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="width: 100%;" |
|
The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 21:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)</small> |
|
|
|
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" | |
|
|
|
|
|
{| |
|
== MfD nomination of ] == |
|
|
|
| ] |
|
|
|
|
|
| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div> |
|
], a page you created, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ]''' 00:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> |
|
|
|
|
|
* Project news: '']'' |
|
:*The US and the UK are the 2 largest foreign troop contingencies yes. You could equally have chosen an image from each force, but given all the patriotic userboxes on your userpage it's pretty clear what your intent was. --]''' 02:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
* Articles: '']'' |
|
::*Yes, the US and UK are the two largest entities. But being as I was not readily able to find a UK-related Iraq War image, I chose instead to represent the ground and air fronts instead of individual nations (again, the US and UK were not the ].) If you can find some UK images, I would be happy to consider them. But this alone is not a basis for deletion. ~ ]<small><sup>(]|])</sup></small> 02:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
* Book review: '']'' |
|
|
|
|
|
</div> |
|
== Archive links to CommonDreams == |
|
|
|
|- |
|
|
|
|
|
|} |
|
Hi, I am wondering why you have decided (twice now) to delete a reference which is archived at CommonDreams.org, despite having the original reference at the Associated Press also intact. Is there something in Misplaced Pages policy that mandates that any article '''archived''' by a partisan site is unsuitable for inclusion in an article? ] (]) 16:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|} |
|
:As a matter of fact, ]. But the bigger question is why an archive link is even needed when the original is still available on AP's website. ~ ]<small><sup>(]|])</sup></small> 16:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;"> |
|
:: Regarding the ] link, I see. Thanks for the info. In the future, you may want to consider fixing the issue with the reference rather than outright deletion. ] (]) 16:41, 28 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 19:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
:::No problem. ~ ]<small><sup>(]|])</sup></small> 16:42, 28 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
</div> |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1175234447 --> |
|
== IP == |
|
|
|
|
|
I would recommend that you sign up for an account. It's free, anonymous (no IP-Location backtracker on your talk page), and you are not restricted from editing semi-protected articles. ~ ]<small><sup>(]|])</sup></small> 19:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
:Thanks, but no thanks. I have no interest in registering an account. ] (]) 19:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==WikiProject Films ]== |
|
|
The ''']''' of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have any suggestions for improvement or desire other topics to be covered, please leave a message on the talk page of one of the editors.Thank you. ] (]) 01:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== 9/11 == |
|
|
|
|
|
:] ''For future reference, Xiutwel, if you want your opinions here to be respected, please return the favor. '' |
|
|
I was under the impression I was doing pretty well, but you show me I can still improve on that. I am being very patient with dozens of editors who are extremely frustrated and rude, and violate wikipedia policy all the time, erasing facts whereever they find them, because they have some dogmatic belief in their government's virtues. Despite this irritating behaviour, I am doing my utmost to remain polite. Please let me know specifically when you feel I'm being unrespectful, if you want me to be able to change. (You might wanna consider giving the same pointer to some other editors on that page, though.) — ] ♫☺♥♪ <small>]</small> 02:30, 5 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
:The wording of your post here is yet another example of the incivility which I originally called you on: you have consistently failed to ]. If you cannot be brought to see the meaning of this, I shall not waste my time trying to explain it to you. As it is, the matter in which this dispute arose has now been closed. ~ ]<small><sup>(]|])</sup></small> 06:03, 8 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Killian Documents == |
|
|
|
|
|
Please explain your recent edit to ] on the article's Talk page. Specifically, you removed from the opening sentence the critical information that experts have characterized the documents as probable forgeries. What was your reason for doing this? ] (]) 14:43, 11 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Request for comment == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. A little back, after a Talk page discussion, I placed on ] with "''Relative weight of warming/cooling ] components as estimated by the ]''" as the description, and I had given some thought to have the description clear and brief for non-experts. But that was later changed by ] (while I was blocked) to "''The ] in 2005 relative to 1750 as estimated by the ]''," but I think this description is not as informative, if not being outright cryptic, for a typical user of Misplaced Pages articles for this type of subject. I had created a new Talk page proposing changing the wording back to its original, and asked for comments. Only ] responded a couple of days later with just ''I like my wording, actually.'' I asked him to explain that but he didn't and after a couple of more days, I finally changed the wording back to the original. He then almost immediately reverted me. I reverted back and explained on his talk page how he had ample opportunity to comment before hand but didn't. But he only reverted again, and appears not to want to get into a serious discussion. I have to avoid even a hint of getting into a revert war (which he knows all about), so I'm just requesting some other GW regulars to stop by and offer an opinion on the wording if they have one. Thanks in advance. -BC aka ] (]) 16:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
