| Revision as of 14:48, 15 February 2008 editScarian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers28,509 edits →Re:RfA suggestions from 2 weeks ago: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:13, 2 December 2024 edit undoPedro (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators22,741 editsm archive | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{archive box|] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]}}{{clear}} | |||
| {{administrator}}{{Right now British}} | |||
| {| class="messagebox standard" style=background:{{{}} | |||
| | style="text-align: {{{align|center}}}"| | |||
| {{{message|'''Dear visitor to my talk page; I'm seriously busy in real life at the moment. I'll still reply here, and will be on daily, but if you're after me for such things as ] you may have to wait for more than a day or so. Sorry.'''}}} | |||
| |} | |||
| {{archive box|] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]}} | |||
| <b><font color="Black" face="tahoma"> Please leave new comments at the bottom of the page. Please sign you name if you'd be so kind by typing four tildes i.e. <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> at the end of your message.</font></b> | |||
| <br /> | |||
| ] | |||
| <b><font color="blue" face="tahoma"> Hi, please leave a message.</font></b><br> | |||
| = | |||
| ==203.94.143.9== | |||
| Pedro, I urge you to look at the contributions for this IP and the fact that it's been given three warnings for vandalism this month alone. As well it has a very long history of blocks for vandalism. I believe a second look is worthy. ] (]) 23:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == RE: Editor review == | |||
| Thanks for the editor review, Pedro! I left a more lengthy response ], so you may reply there if you wish. Thanks again! ''']''' <small>(] • ])</small> 02:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == BRC == | |||
| So, erm, when are you joining? '']'' <small>(])</small> 08:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :When I get five spare minutes with a camera and my bath robe! Which could be ] with my time pressures at th emoment :( <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 10:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == please sign here == | |||
| I finally found you. I had adapted my signature from sorry guy and had decide to ask him if he minded. He told me he got it from you, so I ask you, do you mind me using and adaptation of your signature?--<small><span style="border:3px solid #004e00;padding:2px;">] ]</span></small> 10:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::More than welcome! <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 10:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notice of request for deletion of editor {{BASEPAGENAME}} :)== | |||
| ] {{BASEPAGENAME}}, the editor you are, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that you satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space. Your ] are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit during the discussion but should not remove the nomination (unless you wish ]); such removal will not end the deletion discussion (''actually it will''). Thank you, and have a good sense of humor :). ]''']''' 00:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, about time too! <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 08:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Myles Munroe== | |||
| Thank you for your edits to ].--] (]) 12:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thanks== | |||
| Re: . As far as I'm concerned, anyone who wishes to fix my typos is welcome to do so... :-) <font face="Verdana">]]</font> 19:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == On RFR == | |||
| Ha, ha. :) Well, I'm glad to know that our concerns there were supported by each other. :) ] 20:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == -to == | |||
| That wasn't "to" bold, was it? LOL]]] 20:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :) class !! | |||
| ==Rollback thanks and username== | |||
| Thanks very much for granting me rollback :) My username is just my real name, so no link with the college :) When friends speak of how their names are famous, I usually win with the college in Winchester :D Best thanks, ] | ] 21:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: WT:RFR == | |||
| Sorry, but I'm not following you. Can we discuss this ] instead of battle? ] <small>(] • ])</small> 22:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :yep! <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 22:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::If you're going to use January 10 2008, can you at least link "January 10" and not just "January"? ] <small>(] • ])</small> 22:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Done my friend - This is a wiki - you could have done it yourself you know!!. Please don't feel like this is some kind of "battle" that you "won" or "lost" - it's just about making wikipedia as clear as possible. Best wishes. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 22:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I know now what you were trying to do, however, now there's the matter of making sure are styled in the same fashion. Is there a bot or something that can save us the trouble? ] <small>(] • ])</small> 23:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I'm not sure you're correct here. My first random click was ] which is in the general format I prefer, and per MOS - basically not your format, I'm sorry to say. Bear in mind that ] is high visability so clarity is best. Altering individual talk pages of less high prominence articles seems a poor use of bot resources <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 23:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::What would you suggest? Manual editing of individual talk pages or just leaving it alone for now? ] <small>(] • ])</small> 23:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::I'd leave them - most seem either in the format as above or with no date specified at all. The link to the debate is far more important. Frankly no date at all hardly hinders the project - it's really only to try and pre-empt another XFD debate shortly after the first one. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 23:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Re:RfA suggestions from 2 weeks ago == | |||
| Hi Pedro, I read your comment on my RfA... those dodgy AIV reports were all ]'s workings/bugs etc. I know that users '''must''' (at least) have a final warning or an <nowiki>{{subst:uw-vandalism4im}}</nowiki> before a report to AIV is possible. When Huggle has done these things I've quickly attempted to undo the error and taken full responsibility. I do hope that has been noted. Thanks again for your comment to me 2 weeks ago; I really appreciate it. Take care, ]] 14:48, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:13, 2 December 2024
=