Misplaced Pages

Aïbeg and Serkis: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:18, 16 February 2008 editAramgar (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,592 edits Added disputed tag← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:26, 23 November 2023 edit undoDurziil89 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,805 edits per article 
(35 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{For|other uses of Serkis|Serkis (disambiguation){{!}}Serkis}}
{{disputed}}
'''Aïbeg and Serkis''', also '''Aibeg and Sergis''' or '''Aïbäg and Särgis''', were two ]s sent by the ] ruler ] to ] in 1247–1248. They were the first Mongol envoys to ].
{{redirect|Serkis|other uses|Sarkis}}
'''Aïbeg and Serkis''', also '''Aibeg and Sergis''' or '''Aïbäg and Särgis''', were two embassadors sent by the Mongol ruler ] to ] in 1247-1248. They were the first Mongol envoys to ].


Aïbeg ("Moon Prince") is thought to have been a ] ], possibly ], and Serkis (from the Christian name "Sergius") a ], possibly ].<ref>Roux, p.316: "Ascelin of Cremone (...) had himself accompanied by two diplomats, a Christian turcophone, maybe Uighur, named Aibeg ("Moon Prince"), and a Nestorian, probably Syrian, Sergis".</ref> Both were sent by Baichu , to accompany the 1245 embassy of the ] ] back to ], ]. They stayed there for about a year.<ref>Runciman, p.259</ref> Aïbeg ("Moon Prince") is thought to have been a ] ], possibly ], and Sergis (from the Roman and later Christian name "Sergius" or "Sarkis") a ], probably ].<ref>Roux, p.316: "Ascelin of Cremone (...) had himself accompanied by two diplomats, a Christian turcophone, maybe Uighur, named Aibeg ("Moon Prince"), and a Nestorian, probably Syrian, Sergis".</ref> Both were sent by Baichu, to accompany the 1245 embassy of the ] ] back to ], ], where the Pope was residing at the time. They stayed there for about a year.<ref name="Runciman, p.259">Runciman, p.259.</ref>


Aïbeg and Serkis met with Innocent IV in 1248, and remitted to him a rather vexing letter from Baichu, expressing his difficulty in understanding the Pope's message, and asking for his submission:<ref>Roux, p.316</ref> Aïbeg and Serkis met with Innocent IV in 1248, and remitted to him a rather vexing letter from Baichu, expressing his difficulty in understanding the Pope's message, and asking for his submission:<ref>Roux, p.316.</ref>


{{quote|"By the strength of the ], the word of Prince Baichu. You Pope, know that your messengers came to visit us and brought to us your letters. They made strange discourses to us, and we do not known if you ordered them to utter these words, and if they did so of their own accord..."|Letter from Baichu to Pope Innocent IV, 1248<ref>Quoted in Roux, p.316</ref>}} {{quote|"By the strength of the ], the word of Prince Baichu. You Pope, know that your messengers came to visit us and brought to us your letters. They made strange discourses to us, and we do not know if you ordered them to utter these words, and if they did so of their own accord..."|Letter from Baichu to Pope Innocent IV, 1248<ref>Quoted in Roux, p.316.</ref>}}


As a reply to the letter from Baiju, Innocent IV remitted to the envoys the letter known as '']''.<ref>Roux, Histoire de l'Empire Mongol, p.316: "Sergis et Aibeg were finally sent back on November 22, 1248, with an answer, known as ''Viam agnoscere veritatis''" (Original French quote: "Serbeg et Aibeg furent finalement congédiés le 22 Novembre 1248 avec une réponse, la lettre connue comme ''Viam agnoscere veritatis''").</ref> <ref>Setton, p.522 "The Pope's reply to Baidju's letter, ''Viam agnoscere veritatis'', dated November 22, 1248, and probably carried back by Aibeg and Sargis"</ref> According to historian Kenneth Setton, it "stated that Innocent IV had acted out of a sense of duty to let the true religion be known to the Mongols, and that he regretted the Mongols' perseverance in their errors and adjured them to cease their menaces."<ref>Setton, p.522</ref> The Pope appealed to the Mongols to stop their killing of Christians, while indicating no further interest in continuing the dialogue.<ref>Rachewiltz, p. 118. "In his letter the pontiff urged the Mongols to stop persevering in their errors and to end the slaughter, especially of Christians. There is not even a hint at a renewal of the dialogue with the Tartars."</ref> As a reply to the letter from Baiju, Innocent IV remitted to the envoys the letter known as '']''.<ref>Roux, Histoire de l'Empire Mongol, p.316: "Sergis et Aibeg were finally sent back on November 22, 1248, with an answer, known as ''Viam agnoscere veritatis''" (Original French quote: "Serbeg et Aibeg furent finalement congédiés le 22 Novembre 1248 avec une réponse, la lettre connue comme ''Viam agnoscere veritatis''").</ref><ref>Setton, p.522 "The Pope's reply to Baidju's letter, ''Viam agnoscere veritatis'', dated November 22, 1248, and probably carried back by Aibeg and Sargis".</ref> According to historian ], it "stated that Innocent IV had acted out of a sense of duty to let the true religion be known to the Mongols, and that he regretted the Mongols' perseverance in their errors and adjured them to cease their menaces."<ref>Setton, p.522 .</ref> The Pope appealed to the Mongols to stop their killing of Christians, while indicating no further interest in continuing the dialogue.<ref>Rachewiltz, p. 118. "In his letter the pontiff urged the Mongols to stop persevering in their errors and to end the slaughter, especially of Christians. There is not even a hint at a renewal of the dialogue with the Tartars."</ref>


Aïbeg and Serkis stayed at Lyon for about a year, before returning to the Mongol realm on November 22, 1248.<ref name="Runciman, p.259"/><ref>Roux, ''Histoire de l'Empire Mongol'', p.316.</ref>
According to Grousset, in the response he remitted to them the Pope deplored the delays in establishing a general alliance between the Christians and the Mongols.<ref>"Histoire des Croisades", René Grousset, p523: Grousset mentions the "response remitted to Aibag and Sargis" in which "he deplored the delays to the general agreement between Mongols and Christiandom" ("Innocent IV congédia Aibag and Sargis en leur remettant pour Baiju une réponse dans laquelle il déplorait les retards apportés à une entente générale des Mongols et de la Chrétienté.").</ref> Runciman also states that Aibeg and Sarkis returned to the Mongol realm in November 1248, "with complaints that nothing further was happening about the alliance".<ref>Runciman, p.259</ref>

Aïbeg and Serkis stayed at Lyon for about a year, before returning to the Mongol realm on November 22, 1248.<ref>Runciman, p.259</ref><ref>Roux, ''Histoire de l'Empire Mongol'', p.316</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
Line 22: Line 19:


==References== ==References==
* Jackson, Peter, ''Mongols and the West'' * Jackson, Peter, ''Mongols and the West'', p.&nbsp;89
* Grousset, Rene, ''Histoire des Croisades, III'', Tempus, 2006 edition, ISBN 226202569X * Grousset, Rene, ''Histoire des Croisades, III'', Tempus, 2006 edition, {{ISBN|2-262-02569-X}}
* Rachewiltz, I, ''Papal Envoys to the Great Khans'', Stanford University Press, 1971. * Rachewiltz, I, ''Papal Envoys to the Great Khans'', Stanford University Press, 1971.
* Roux, Jean-Paul, ''Histoire de l'Empire Mongol'', 1993, Fayard, ISBN 2213031649 * Roux, Jean-Paul, ''Histoire de l'Empire Mongol'', 1993, Fayard, {{ISBN|2-213-03164-9}}
* Kenneth Meyer Setton, "A History of the Crusades" * Kenneth Meyer Setton, "A History of the Crusades"
* Runciman, Steven, ''History of the Crusades, III'', Penguin Books, 2002 edition, ISBN 014013705X * Runciman, Steven, ''History of the Crusades, III'', Penguin Books, 2002 edition, {{ISBN|0-14-013705-X}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Aibeg And Serkis}}
]
] ]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 19:26, 23 November 2023

For other uses of Serkis, see Serkis.

Aïbeg and Serkis, also Aibeg and Sergis or Aïbäg and Särgis, were two ambassadors sent by the Mongol ruler Baichu to Pope Innocent IV in 1247–1248. They were the first Mongol envoys to Europe.

Aïbeg ("Moon Prince") is thought to have been a Turcophone Christian, possibly Uighur, and Sergis (from the Roman and later Christian name "Sergius" or "Sarkis") a Nestorian Christian, probably Assyrian. Both were sent by Baichu, to accompany the 1245 embassy of the Dominican Ascelin of Lombardia back to Lyon, France, where the Pope was residing at the time. They stayed there for about a year.

Aïbeg and Serkis met with Innocent IV in 1248, and remitted to him a rather vexing letter from Baichu, expressing his difficulty in understanding the Pope's message, and asking for his submission:

"By the strength of the Khagan, the word of Prince Baichu. You Pope, know that your messengers came to visit us and brought to us your letters. They made strange discourses to us, and we do not know if you ordered them to utter these words, and if they did so of their own accord..."

— Letter from Baichu to Pope Innocent IV, 1248

As a reply to the letter from Baiju, Innocent IV remitted to the envoys the letter known as Viam agnoscere veritatis. According to historian Kenneth Setton, it "stated that Innocent IV had acted out of a sense of duty to let the true religion be known to the Mongols, and that he regretted the Mongols' perseverance in their errors and adjured them to cease their menaces." The Pope appealed to the Mongols to stop their killing of Christians, while indicating no further interest in continuing the dialogue.

Aïbeg and Serkis stayed at Lyon for about a year, before returning to the Mongol realm on November 22, 1248.

See also

Notes

  1. Roux, p.316: "Ascelin of Cremone (...) had himself accompanied by two diplomats, a Christian turcophone, maybe Uighur, named Aibeg ("Moon Prince"), and a Nestorian, probably Syrian, Sergis".
  2. ^ Runciman, p.259.
  3. Roux, p.316.
  4. Quoted in Roux, p.316.
  5. Roux, Histoire de l'Empire Mongol, p.316: "Sergis et Aibeg were finally sent back on November 22, 1248, with an answer, known as Viam agnoscere veritatis" (Original French quote: "Serbeg et Aibeg furent finalement congédiés le 22 Novembre 1248 avec une réponse, la lettre connue comme Viam agnoscere veritatis").
  6. Setton, p.522 "The Pope's reply to Baidju's letter, Viam agnoscere veritatis, dated November 22, 1248, and probably carried back by Aibeg and Sargis".
  7. Setton, p.522 .
  8. Rachewiltz, p. 118. "In his letter the pontiff urged the Mongols to stop persevering in their errors and to end the slaughter, especially of Christians. There is not even a hint at a renewal of the dialogue with the Tartars."
  9. Roux, Histoire de l'Empire Mongol, p.316.

References

  • Jackson, Peter, Mongols and the West, p. 89
  • Grousset, Rene, Histoire des Croisades, III, Tempus, 2006 edition, ISBN 2-262-02569-X
  • Rachewiltz, I, Papal Envoys to the Great Khans, Stanford University Press, 1971.
  • Roux, Jean-Paul, Histoire de l'Empire Mongol, 1993, Fayard, ISBN 2-213-03164-9
  • Kenneth Meyer Setton, "A History of the Crusades"
  • Runciman, Steven, History of the Crusades, III, Penguin Books, 2002 edition, ISBN 0-14-013705-X
Categories: