Misplaced Pages

User talk:KellyAna: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:10, 17 February 2008 editKellyAna (talk | contribs)6,723 edits I'm Sorry: reply← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:01, 19 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(572 intermediate revisions by 91 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="usermessage" style="background-color:Orange; border-color: #Black;"><div class="plainlinks">
<div class="usermessage"><div style="text-align:center;" class="plainlinks">If you leave me a message on this page, I will reply on this page and vice versa. Thank you.<br></div></div><!-- REMOVAL OF THIS COMMENT IS CONSIDERED VANDALISM. DO NOT REMOVE MY MESSAGES FROM MY PAGE-->
'''Welcome to my talk page'''

*If you post a message on this page, I'll reply on this page.
*If I've left you a message on your talk page, I will watch it for your response, so please reply there. RESPONSES LEFT HERE WILL BE MOVED TO YOUR PAGE.
*Please sign and date your comments by inserting four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) at the end.</div></div>
<small>Credit goes to Pairadox for the big orange banner</small>
<!--Template <!--Template
:Archivebox begins--> :Archivebox begins-->
<div class="infobox" style="width: 315px"> <div class="infobox" style="width: 315px">
<div style="text-align: center">]<br /> <div style="text-align: center">]<br/>
] ]
</div> </div>
# ] # ]
# ] # ]
# ] # ]
# ]


</div><!--Template:Archivebox ends--> </div><!--Template:Archivebox ends-->
__TOC__ __TOC__


== Nicole Walker ==
==Sami needs sections!==

LOL, nosy me went to ] to check out what was going on, and I noticed that her loooong character bio is in desperate need of some subheadings to split it up! I see you've said it's being worked on, so maybe you have that in mind. Obviously, it would make editing easier if the text was broken up. &mdash; ]<sup>]</sup> 01:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Listen, you. Stop altering the Nicole page with false information. I have asked you nicely. Now you are just being annoying.
:I know. I think she does too. I started watching the page when it was being moved all over but now I'm looking at the storyline and it kind of sucks and is in need of a lot of clean up. It needs like a section for the 90s, her marriages/engagements, her schemes. There's a lot that could be done. But give me this, I at least tried to edit "in present tense" this time. ] 01:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


==Apology==
I don't know how to reply on "my page." I am sorry for my comment and question on the EJ Wells talk page that were so inappropriate that they had to be immediately deleted. Your time is valuable and I should mind my own business and not bother you. ] (]) 03:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

== Grant Chuggle now on LTA ==

To bring back a brief blast from what I hope will always remain the past, I have taken the trouble to create ] at LTA for Grant, in case he returns. This way you can include the link with any AIV report to save the trouble of explaining him to another admin. ] (]) 20:18, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

==Welcome back==
Welcome back, hope all is well! &mdash; ]<sup>]</sup> 23:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
:As well as can be expected. LOL. Good, or maybe bad, news is I went to the doctor today and found out why the mood swings and really really bad moods. I don't have allergies, I have a roaring sinus infection. Not making excuses, I did what I did, but at least I got an answer to why. How's life as an unemployed person in LA? ] (]) 23:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
:: I'm glad that you're getting to the bottom of things. I have suffered from sinus infections myself and I know that they're no fun! Do you trust the doctor? I had to go through 3 or 4 doctors before I found one who I really felt was understanding things, and then once I found a good one, I've stuck with him for years. :)

:: BTW, one other small piece of "course correction" advice. Please be very careful with what you put into edit summaries. Sometimes they can get you into even more trouble than actual comments, because they show up more quickly if someone is doing a quick scan of your contribs: {{user|KellyAna}}. So I recommend that you be scrupulous about keeping the summaries limited to the content, and don't refer to other users at all. You're doing a good job reverting bona fide vandalism, but be careful to only use the word "vandalism" in an edit summary if you're reverting something really blatant (like the editor that changed "son" to "daughter"). That's definitely vandalism. However other edits, where people seem to be making good faith changes that are just wrong, it's not okay to refer to them as vandalism. A revert may still be appropriate, but it would be better to use some other edit summary such as "reverting unsourced material" or "fixing", or when in doubt, the nice neutral "copyediting" is always safe. :) Just giving you a heads-up, --]]] 00:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
:::To be honest, it's too soon to tell about the doctor. Knowing that Claritan isn't going to help an infection did make sense and the "mood swing" comment didn't until I looked it up. He explained the combination of an infection with the wrong medicine and the proximity to the brain and pain effecting moods, yada yada yada.... I guess it makes sense in a way, I have been in a lot of pain but I thought it was because the world bloomed all at once without warning and then we had close to a week of rain. I don't know anymore, I just want the pain to stop and the moods to go back to normal because this isn't working.
:::Now, about "vandalism." I didn't think I had used that word tonight except for the guy who called Lorenzo Lamas a girl. But maybe I did.
:::I am sorry for what I said to you. The infection is no excuse, we should control our bodies, not our bodies control us. The head pain (my face hurts if I bite down with my front teeth), the wrong medicine, the lack of ability to breath are factors but they aren't an excuse for how I treated you. I make no excuses, I should have walked away rather than been such a bitch. I'm sorry. Please accept my apology. I can't guarantee I won't do it again, that would be a lie, but I can say I'll try not to. ] (]) 00:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

== Apology ==

I knew I'd misclicked and reverted your edits to the 3RR noticeboard, but I originally thought I must have accidentally hit the rollback button. I just noticed that it was actually twinkle's vandalism button, so I wanted to apologize for the edit summary even though I'd rolled myself back within a few seconds. --]]] 03:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
:You're all good. Thanks for taking the time to apologize, that's really nice. A lot of people wouldn't do that. I appreciate that you did. Have a good night and thanks again. ] (]) 03:34, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

==Politeness==
I said "polite and friendly." This doesn't cut it. Please read ]. --]]] 04:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
:This is getting WAY TOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MUCH. I was nice. I didn't snark. You are "holding me to too high a standard" and by your standards I'll never cut it. I'm going to go cry myself to sleep because I can't, I just can't live up to your new found standards. I was not impolite. I WASN'T. Why are you being mean? Going to cry now because YOU told me to warn him about the April Fools thing. Maybe you should have done it instead of telling me to do it.] (]) 04:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
:: If I would have done it, I would have posted something like, "Hah, cute April Fools joke on your userpage. Too bad you can't keep it there for awhile, but it does kind of run afoul of ]. Just thought I'd drop you a reminder about it. I look forward to reading more about you, the editor, when you update it!" (note: This doesn't mean I want you to copy/paste, I'm just suggesting a different kind of tone. But you gotta write whatever feels sincere to you) --]]] 04:53, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
:::I have no sense of humor, I hate April Fools and got a man fired for pulling an April Fools joke. I was nice to the best of my ability based on what you said to tell him, you need to stop holding me to some ridiculously impossible standard that I will never live up to. You should have done it yourself and not chastized me for not doing it your way. If it really is an April Fools joke, it's not funny. ] (]) 04:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

:::: For what it's worth, I feel the same about 80% of the April Fools jokes I see. ;) But you really have to work on your courtesy. --]]] 05:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

==Gina Von Amberg==


Thank you so much for that spelling correction! It has been bothering me for quite some time! ] (]) 18:42, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
==Las Vegas==
Nobody knows if they went through with the annulment so for the time being they are still married until they clear it up.] (]) 04:30, 28 January 2008 (UTC) :You're welcome. ] (]) 19:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


== The Walker Family ==


Why did you undo all my contributions? Paul, Fay, and Taylor need their own pages and now they are gone. ] (]) 19:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
If The Futon Critic is "gossip" then I'm hear to tell you they have the right "gossip" and they have been 100% reliable all season with the episodes for Las Vegas. You still didn't say why now you're jumping in there. I submitted episodes earlier in the season and you never said boo.
:Minor characters with little to no notability have no place in an encyclopedia. These pages were previously merged or deleted and do not belong on Misplaced Pages. This is not a fan site, it is an encyclopedia. When notability is not there, pages get removed. ] (]) 19:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


::Want me to block him now? ]] 19:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
I still stand by The Futon Critic as a reliable source for episodes, because they get their information from NBC. Same goes for TV Guide's blogs. They've stated many times someone will make a guest appearence on a show and said person does appear.
:::Yes please. He's being uncivil and removing valid content along with creating unnecessary previously merged or deleted pages AND I am 99% sure he's a sock. Thank you. ] (]) 19:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


::::Bah, I gave him a block for 24 hours. Maybe he'll calm down after that. Keep up the good work and happy editing! ]] 19:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
James Blunt - "Same Mistake" in the two hour finale of Las Vegas titled "Three Weddings and a Funeral Parts 1 & 2" airing ]] @ 9:00pm E/P.
:::::Thank you. I'm curious to see if {{User|NikoSwavae00}} now shows up. They were editing the same brand new pages that I redirected back to the main ''Days'' page. {{User|Grant Chuggle}} used to delete any mention of ]s so it makes me really suspicious. I guess I'll just have to be vigilante tonight. ] (]) 20:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


I have no idea. I didn't really pay so much attention to the content but to the fact that RionDC was doing things he shouldn't have been doing. I'll take a look and see if I can spot any similiarities. ]] 16:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
I'd like to point out one other thing. Many users do not believe Wiki is reliable either, since this site too relies of fans of shows for information and can be considered "gossip". ] (]) 16:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
:Many people/users don't believe Misplaced Pages is reliable because of users who continually put up unreliable information. If we were more diligent about bad sources, Misplaced Pages would become a more reliable site in and of itself. Stand by Futon Critic all you want, it's not considered reliable, as you've been told many,many,many times, your edits will just continue to be reverted. ] (]) 00:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)


: - Could be grounds in itself for an ]. But you'd need to find harder similiarities than just editing the same article. Sorry I couldn't be of any more help. Message me if you need anything else! ]] 16:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
If the Futon is so unreliable, then why did every single episode for Season 5 of Las Vegas right? Same thing for Gossip Girl, Law & Order: SVU, ER and CSI?


== Morgan Hollingsworth ==
Btw, concerning references, when are you going to re-add for episodes from Seasons 1-4 and the rest of Season 5? ] (]) 22:07, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
:It is not my responsibility to go back and find old references but it is my responsibility to keep you from removing legitimate references. You were blocked for your actions. You should discontinue editing in a manner that has already gotten you blocked. ] (]) 22:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


Why was the page deleted? Reid Hochstedler 17:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
==Kristen Renton==
:The page was deemed unnecessary as she is not ] by Misplaced Pages standards. She's a minor character and this is an encyclopedia, not a fan site. Minor characters don't warrant pages. ] (]) 17:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Kristen Renton on Days of Our Lives is on Contract not recurring status. She first appeared on days in september 2007 on recurring status. But in december went on contract. Her first contract appearance on Days was December 3, 2007. http://members.aol.com/jason47b/ is a source on this but I've seen this news in several different places. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 23:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:: I disagree, I believe she is notable. The character has been involved in story lines which could be considered central to the show, e.g. Campus Rapist, Ford Decker death, ... I will reinstate the page and add a notability tag, if other people questions her notability I will delete the page. Reid Hochstedler 17:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC) <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Incorrect. That is false information perpetuated by a wanna be Days "historian" by the name of Jason (you've put up his not considered reliable source webpage) based on speculation that her name was in X order in the credits. She's not on contract and has only appeared once in 2008. ] (]) 23:44, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
:::Well, several others with more experience than you or I decided the page should be redirected to the main Days page. If you reinstate a deleted page, you will be flagged. Her page has already been deleted. Adding back a deleted page is a violation of Misplaced Pages policy. Consider this a warning. ] (]) 17:23, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
::I found another source that says Kristen Renton is on contract. Here is the Link http://www.soapcentral.com/days/castlist.phpIf this is not satisfactory enough, I will email nbc, sony pictures, whoever... to get proof.
Thanks. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:12, 30 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> :::: I can agree with creating a list page for minor characters. Thank you for not being irrational. Reid Hochstedler 17:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC) <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Wiccan! ==
:::Also, just because she's only appeared once in 2008 doesn't mean she's not on contract. Frances Reid is on contract and only appeared twice in 2007. I understand these are special circumstances for the shows aging Matriarch. I'm just saying that one does not have to be on often to be on contract. They put her on contract so they can use her at their will. Just because they aren't using her much now doesn't mean they don't how plans on using her more later down the road. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::http://www.dayscafe.com/cast.html is another source. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::http://celebratingthesoaps.com/news.html another source <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::http://www.sptimes.com/2007/12/30/Northpinellas/Days_of_her_life_look.shtml also mentions her year-long contract <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::::The most recent link I put up with a published newspaper article. That's a veriable source. If you have doubts about this source or want to know where the reporter got her source (she interviewed Renton herself by the way) there is a link to the reporters email address below the article. One of us could contact her. Thank you. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:46, 30 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::::Further speculation... I've seen this on several message boards, there's a rumor that Morgan is Tony and Anna's long lost child. Tony and Anna made their first appearance in 2008 today. (1/29). Since we haven't had Tony and Anna yet, they couldn't have used Morgan yet to initiate this storyline. I don't have proof that this storyline will take place...I'm just trying to show her lack of appearance on 2008 thus far does not mean anything about if she's on contract or recurring. Which is an argument you used that she's not on contract. Besides her character was in her hometown for christmas break...my college would not start up school for the spring semester until the end of January...so its perfectly reasonable to assume why the character hadn't been seen yet. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 05:20, 30 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::::::Rumours and speculation have no place in articles. ] (]) 14:12, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
:::::::That rumor was not in an article. I placed it in the discussion. I had no intentions on putting this information on an article. I was only trying to make a point about how Morgan is popping up everywhere in the rumor world and she should be taken seriously. I would hope you try to help me verify if she's on contract or not. And It would be okay if you said that rumors without reliable sources have no place here. But you got on to me for placing a rumor on article when I did no such thing. I expect you to not get on to me for things I did not do.<small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:52, 30 January 2008 (UTC)] (]) 23:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)</small>
::::::::What are you talking about? I didn't "get you" for anything. At the end of each comment is a signature, check that before accusing, please. ] (]) 00:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
:::::::::That comment was not directed to you, it was directed towards IrishLass as it was in a response to her comments right above. I know your User talk page isn't the place to respond. But IrishLass commented on my comments to you on your page and I was just continuing the conversation. It was fairly obvious that those comments were directed to IrishLass. She was the one who comment that rumors and speculations have no place here and I was responding to her. I did not once say your name in that comment when I defended myself against her getting on to me. Please fully understand that context of the comment before accusing me of accusing you. Thanks! ] (]) 05:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
::::::::::I suggest next time you use a name and the bold feature (i.e. '''Doolkid''') when replying to someone. I causes far less confusion in the long run. ] (]) 05:32, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
::::::::::::<b>KellyAna</b>I just want offer my apologies for any trouble I may have stirred up. Please refer to my detailed comments on days of our lives cast page. Thank you.] (]) 00:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


Uhhh, that's about all I had to say...sorry. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 19:42, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
==Las Vegas Guest Stars list==
:Okay. I'm confused. Am I needed to work a spell or something? ] (]) 19:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
I am only using imdb to look up episode then i am using the dvds box set i own to verify the name. which they match.
] (]) 04:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC) TJ21
:Two problems, IMDB isn't reliable source and the DVD box is OR, Original Research. Making so many unsourced changes is problematic. Just go slower and people will be less wary of what you are doing. I have no doubt you are making legitimate edits but you need sources and references. ] (]) 04:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
okay gotcha, i'll remember that in the future. thanks for the information. ] (]) <small>—Preceding ] was added at 04:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


==Las Vegas Production== == April 2008 ==
<div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:|'''{{{reason}}}'''|repeated ]}}. Please stop. You're welcome to ] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:true|] <sup>]</sup> 22:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 -->
Oh, I didn't know there was a spot in the infoboxes for that. Should we include the executive producers also. I noticed several sites include both production companies and producers. Here are the names if you want to add them: Gary Scott Thompson, Matt Pyken, Kim Newton, Justin Falvey & Darryl Frank. Those came off of NBC.com, I'll leave it up to you on rather or not to add them, I'm busy on another site. Anymore issue's with Robin? Thanks DJS--] (]) 02:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
:Yes and Yes. Yes, we should include them, that's why I went and brought the whole template over. I didn't mean to maliciously remove your edits, I thought the field was filled in but the Vegas box was missing it. I think any field we can fill in makes the box look better. There's co-producers and executive producers. Fill them in as appropriate would be my opinion. As for Robin, constant!! She loves to remove citation request, valid sources, et al. ] (]) 02:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
::No Problem, let me know if you need help with the infobox or consensus/my opinon on the Robin issue.--] (]) 02:32, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


== Montgomery Gent ==


:You've been repeatedly asked to stop the ] and maintain civility. Calling good faith edits and the dropping a on the editor's page isn't maintaining civility; you've been specifically asked before to stop referring to contributions you don't like as vandalism. I have blocked your account for 24 hours. When you return, please remember that you can always step away from Misplaced Pages for a bit if you don't feel you can respond in a calm and civil manner. ] <sup>]</sup> 22:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Okay for the second time, yes there were in that episode, I saw it, even if you didn't. Since you won't believe me, go over to TV.com and look it up. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
{{unblock reviewed|1=Please, seriously, explain what personal attacks I made. Someone claiming to remove content that they own which you cannot own date information? How is that not vandalism? I feel that what I did was in good faith and not personal attacks. Seems as though others can call things vandalism or call dates their work but I cannot revert removal of mass amounts of verified content. I, further, don't appreciate the false accusations of a "need to step away" as I was only doing what I've done for months and NEVER been warned about. I was not even afforded a cursory "this might not be the way to do something" even though I believe what I did was correct and did not violate civility. The revert of removal of mass content has always been reverting vandalism, since when is it not. The editor removed content claiming it as his own, that's not allowed.|decline=I do this with a somewhat heavy heart. Under her former username, I had helped her out a lot in her early days here and it was quite fulfilling to watch someone you'd mentored a little grow and develop. I was stunned by the first block, but I have long trusted Elonka and I should say that the way she is handling this is vindicating many of us who supported her RfA a few months ago. Reading her explanation below, especially the bit about the harassing emails, really makes me sad. Kelly, don't do this. If you have a roaring sinus infection it might be a good idea to just sit back and do something else until you feel better, even after the block expires, as it and the medication cannot be helping your mood. Harassing emails is serious business ... this gets people ]. I don't want Kelly to be one of them, as she is capable of so much. — ] (]) 02:44, 5 April 2008 (UTC)}}
:First, their name is Montgomery GentRY. It stands for Eddie Montgomery and T-roy Gentry. You seem to completely not understand that the citation request is for them being in that SPECIFIC episode. If you can't prove it, remove it. Yes, they guest starred this season but you have NO proof which episode. ] (]) 04:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
: I support the block. KellyAna had been cautioned, by me, that it was uncivil to refer to good faith edits as vandalism. Jason47a is an editor with whom she was involved in a prior dispute, and had issued personal attacks towards. She had also been blocked for those attacks. Jason47a noted a page on Misplaced Pages, ], which was unsourced. He added a source to the page, which was his own personal website. KellyAna removed that source as unreliable. Jason47a consulted me (Elonka) for advice, and I counseled him that per ], unsourced information could be removed by any editor. He could have removed large portions of the page, but instead he simply modified some dates and removed some details. Then KellyAna reverted him, called it "vandalism" in the edit summary, and even worse, put a vandalism warning on his talkpage. This was inappropriate on multiple levels, and KellyAna's actions violated multiple policies, from ] to ] and ]. She has already been blocked multiple times just over the last week or so, and received cautions from numerous editors and administrators. I actually think that a 24-hour block is quite lenient at this point. If KellyAna wants to continue participating on Misplaced Pages, she needs to abide by policies, and she needs to show that she can work in a cooperative and collegial manner with other editors. --]]] 00:25, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


== My User Name== ===Extension of block===
I am extending the block to 48 hours. Jason47a informed me that someone matching KellyAna's communication style had sent him a harassing email. I asked him to forward the email to me, and I can confirm that it is from the same Yahoo address which KellyAna previously used to write harassing emails to me, and that it has the same communication style. Along with extending the block, I am also disabling email for this account. If any reviewing admins would like to see the email, please contact me or Jason47a, thanks.
Hello, I'd be happy to explain how I made up my username. See, One of my favorite television shows is ], so what I did to make my username was take the abbreviation (OLTL) and use the numbers off of a telephone keypad. For example, the letter "O" appears on the number "6", "L" on the number "5", etc. The last four numbers come from the year in which I began watching, 2002. I know this sounds a little silly, and possibly confusing, but I can change my user name if it is required. ] (]) 01:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
:That's at least a good explanation that I understand. My sister in law uses 2337 at the end of whatever user name she chooses for whatever site. 2337 spells BEER. So, I get it. Not a problem. Just wanted to make sure there was a reason since Misplaced Pages likes for there to be a reason. Happy editing!! ] (]) 01:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
==CASINO IN MACAU CHINA===
sex lies and lamaze episode:
1. the buddist statue and chinese theme is to attract chinese investestor in order to build a casino in MACAU,CHINA. In order ot get into macau needed chinese investors. So he takes them out personally. 1. it is shown him taking them out. 2. at the start of the episode danny and mike talk about it and how its a great move for cooper to do it. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
ITS NOTS A POV ITS FACT GO WATCH THE EPISODE ON NBC.COM/ they mention IT! <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


KellyAna, stop this, before the block is extended even further. --]]] 00:49, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
== Thanks! ==


===Page unprotection===
Thanks for helping me understand the difference between the cast members. I am sorry for my mistake. Have a great weekend. ] (]) 15:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
I have unprotected the page since someone wanted to post an SSP report here. KellyAna, you are allowed to post here again, but please make sure all comments are in compliance with ]. I may also be willing to lift the block, so that you can post at the SSP page, but I would need assurances from you that you would be able to moderate your behavior. --]]] 02:30, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
:You're welcome. Just try not to jump the gun too much. ] (]) 16:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
:Listen, I'm okay with the 24 hour block. That's fine. I said it, I did it, I was the bitch that I am (although I didn't mean to violate policy, but it is how it is). What I'm really pissed about is I didn't "abuse the Misplaced Pages email system." Jason's email is available on his site and it has been since we first tussled nearly 2 years ago on NBC. Quite honestly, since I've seen the SSP, I don't think unblocking me is a good idea because I'll likely tell DJS, a one time confirmed sock puppeteer himself {{User|CarsGm5}}, where to "stick it." I know when I "need a time out" and with as pissed as I am, a time out until tomorrow morning is probably a good idea. Leave it for 24, I'm pissed and a bitch right now, leaving it is best. ] (]) 03:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
::Leave it for 48. I just read Daniel's comments and just cried. He is so sweet and always has been. He's right, I need the break and a block is just how it needs to be done. Or maybe unblock and see if I can control. Irregardless, I'm okay with it staying. I can piss off a lot of people but disappointing Daniel is too much. ] (]) 03:25, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


== Aj Cooper == == Question ==
Is it allowable to link a video or upload pictures to prove identity? I took them, or was in the picture. It's visual proof of who I am and who Irish is and why we talk to each other off of Wiki through our other site. ] (]) 03:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
* Sure, you can upload a reasonable amount of fair use images. But better would be if you could come up with a plausible explanation for why you use a similar writing style, and you're never online at the same time. --]]] 03:12, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
:: That's Irish presenting Ali the pony. That's me next to her. ] (]) 03:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


For what it's worth, I don't think you're the same person. Irishlass updated the Gina Von Amberg article months ago...you made the spelling change a few days ago. If you were her, why didn't you make the change then? I may not agree with everything other editors say and do, but I will stick up for someone when they are wronged. Sorry you're having such a hard time. ] (]) 04:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
okay when a guy says he played COLLEGE BALL it means he played for his college. Its a slang term. There is a difference between playing pick up games and COLLEGE BALL. ] (]) 16:04, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
:::As I am not allowed to defend myself against DJS's accusations, why is a video of the two of us so offensive? No, Ali didn't call us by our names because until we met her here, she didn't know our names. Irish with Cameron. Me with Cameron. It's easy to see this is taken the same day if you look at what people are wearing.
:No, it's not. He said "he played in college" and for someone his age, there's a big difference. Maybe for a 21 year old it's slang, but AJ Cooper isn't a 21 year old. ] (]) 16:08, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
:::And thanks Rm994, that's really cool. ] (]) 04:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
:::: KellyAna, you are allowed to defend yourself. If you are able to promise that you will present your comments in a civil way, I would be willing to unblock you, with the understanding that for the next 48 hours (or whatever remains of the block) that you will limit yourself to posting only at the SSP page and here on your talkpage. --]]] 04:34, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
:::::Thank you but I don't want that. I want to honestly serve my time. If I don't just because someone accused me of being a sock it's not right. It's killing me, I've already seen vandalism to the ] article so I know I can't stay to just the two pages. Okay, so removing that Billie raped Bo might not be vandalism to you, but it is to me and it shouldn't be removed because she did rape him. Besides, Daniel is right and I hate that I disappointed him. I mean, I really hate it. He's a really good guy and that just cuts that I disappointed him. I know DJS is just being vindictive and I'll prove him wrong but I'll do it when I'm allowed to edit, not under special circumstances. ] (]) 04:42, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


== Re: References == == Changed my mind ==
Oh, this comment is just wrong when someone who I have had minimal contact with can't even offer a comment ON MY TALK PAGE without being attacked, he didn't even comment on the sock puppet stuff. That's not right and not fair. I'm used to Irish and I being accused but to accuse Rm just because he's got a random edit to a Days page and a school, that's not right. ] (]) 04:55, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


:KellyAna, I think I took care of it. Not that it actually bothers me really. I sort of think its funny. Not sure what he's thinking, but as you are well aware, I am not a sock, nor are we the same person :). I would like to be involed with the Days of Our Lives cast page if at all possible. I remember lots of past stars that aren't on the list and would like to contribute. Yes, I have communicated with IrishLass, when I was new to editing. I was so mean to her. I felt like an idiot after she explained the rules. Feel better :) ] (]) 05:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
It's a dead link. ] 05:04, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
::Thanks. I dont want you falsely accused, that's not right. What's so funny is DJS and Blackwatch are so socks but I've never reported them. I don't have the time to play that game but he apparently does. We've always edited the same pages, she watches my as because I'm a bitch but we were cleared before. Whatever, I can't do anything more than I've done because I'm blocked which I'm cool with. Thanks for having my back.] (]) 05:21, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
:No, it's not. This is the link you keep removing and it's working just fine. ] (]) 05:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
:: My bad. It's just me, I've asked 2 others ]s (] n' ]) n' they said the link's workin' fine. I apologize. ] 06:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
::It's also a '''blog''', as their own "About us" testifies. "TV Fodder is an oft-updated '''blog''' featuring TV news, features, reviews, commentary and any other TV-related stuff we can throw together." ] (]) 05:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
:::It is a past story that's true. How do we go about balancing? The sites been around for 8 years. This person was removing the link as broken when it isn't. I've never heard of tvfodder.com. I know TVGuide.com has gone to this "blog" format so it's getting muddy in the waters, you know. You tell me. The facts are accurate as ] and ] did leave ]. My returning it was based on its correctness of facts. His/her removal was based on the false information that it was a broken link. ] (]) 05:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


::::This is also a thread on the article's talk page. I suggest that the appropriateness of the source be discussed there, so it's easier for others to see and participate. ] (]) 05:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC) No problem, and thank you as well. I hope we can work on these pages together to make them great. ] (]) 05:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
:::::No problem. I replied there with essentially the same thing I said here. Should it go to that page where sources are discussed? Sorry, I found it once and didn't put it on my watch list so I don't know how to find it again. You know the page, you contribute to it (so I should probably not be lazy and just check your contributes, shouldn't I =) now). I'll wait for others. The Las Vegas article can get nasty, we'll see what others say. ] (]) 05:50, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
::::::Sorry, missed this earlier. The page is located at ] ('''''R'''''eliable '''''S'''''ources/'''''N'''''oticeboard), if I understand your question correctly, but I'm not sure that's necessary at this point. ] (]) 19:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
:::::::No, it's not necessary for the previous issue but I like to have the info available so, thank you. ] (]) 19:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
::::::::No problem. One suggestion I have for the Project, if it hasn't been done already, is to discuss and compile a list of consensus-based reliable sources and a list of unreliable sources. That would provide a handy reference for established editors and a place to refer new editors, as well as diminishing the need to go over the reliability questions again and again. ] (]) 19:20, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


I'm confused on the references. Why are you keeping them if they don't like to the episodes anymore? I tried the links, they just take me to "Three Weddings and a Funeral Parts 1 & 2". ] (]) 22:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC) I guess it wasn't taken care of after all. Now I'm supposedly a sock. Oh well. Enjoy the rest of your weekend. ] (]) 03:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
:Because they were valid on the "retrieved on" date making them a valid reference. That's why there is a "retrieved on" date on each reference. It's this easy, DON'T REMOVE ANY REFERENCES. Period. Leave the references alone or get blocked again. ] (]) 22:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


== ] ==
::I WILL REMOVE REFERENCE WHERE I SEE FIT!!!!!! Do yourself a favour, don't wait until near th end of the season to jump onboard. Also when are you going to add those so called "valid" references for ALL past episodes?????? I'm still waiting since they're "valid". 22:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC) <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::Fine, but you'll be blocked. You've been warned and blocked before, you'll continue to be blocked for your actions. You've also had the situation explained to you by an admin and he's told you to stop removing the references, that means your actions are vandalism. Plain and simple. Fortunately, anyone can revert vandalism. ] (]) 22:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
::::I see Robin is back to her usual ways, is she removing the same references? I see Fuhghettaboutit gave her one more chance, however I have a feeling she is going to continue reverting. I'm going to keep watching her, as I'm sure you will too. P.S. - Going to Daytona Sunday?? - Thanks DJS --] (]) 23:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
:::::Thursday (was supposed to leave tomorrow but my ride is snowed in in PA and I try to avoid flying at all costs). We're hooked up with the trucks and the <s>Busch</s> Nationwide series. Yes, Robin is up to it. We'll see what happens. He's only giving her one chance so it shouldn't be too much of a problem. ] (]) 23:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
::::::Yeah, I'll be down there Sat and Sun for the 500. --] (]) 23:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
:::::::I haven't been able to stay for the 500 since 2001. It's just too much for me, you know. Although, I was supposed to ride back with my neighbor but for some reason the town cops are at his house right now so who knows what that could mean. My other neighbor is in the infield for the week starting tomorrow so I could stay with them for Sunday. That's the beauty of my neighborhood, many, many options. ] (]) 00:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Really? I guess you haven't heard of internet cafes or using friends' computers. Here's an original thought. DO NOT THREATEN ME AND DO NOT BARK ORDERS AT ME!!!!! You are not my boss and I don't respond AT ALL to threats. What's "is up to it" supposed to mean? None of you were around at the beginning of Season 5 of Las Vegas, only the end and have the nerve to say that I have no idea what I'm doing - right. ] (]) 23:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
:Robin, you've been warned by all the proper authorities. Go heed and leave me alone. ] (]) 00:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


As you may know, a request for checkuser has been filed to help clear things up in the ] DJS24 filed against you. The checkuser found that you and IrishLass0128 are editing from the same area. An explanation about your off-site relationship with IrishLass0128 is needed in addition to why the two of you have never edited at the same time. ]] 21:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
"Good heed"? Did you go back a few centuries or something? If you want me to leave you alone, then why don't you try that too? You're the one who started it. ] (]) 07:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


==Re-blocked==
== First off lady ==
<div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:1 week|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week'''|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:Incivility, disruption, and posting private correspondence without permission|'''Incivility, disruption, and posting private correspondence without permission'''|repeated ]}}. Please stop. You're welcome to ] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:]]] 02:55, 9 April 2008 (UTC)|]]] 02:55, 9 April 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 -->


KellyAna, it appears rather than taking advantage of your unblocked state to go back to editing articles, you instead used it to post uncivil comments at the SSP report, the CheckUser page, and here on your own talkpage. You also appear to have posted what may or may not be someone else's private correspondence. When you posted it at ], I deleted it, and you then reacted by posting it again here at your own talkpage. Both versions have been deleted, and removed from page history. As Daniel Case is an administrator, he will be able to look into the history and still see it. I am also willing to forward any emails that I have received from you or any other accounts associated with yours, to any admins that wish to view them for themselves.
Calm down, because you are not correct it doesn't and shouldn't take years for a characters to get notable. Second off this is only you and IrishLass's opinion if you have a problem bring it to the Project page, until then please ''refrain'' (is that a better term) from doing things as you see fit wait until a concensus happens, are we clear?--] (]) 22:27, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
:First off lady? Take your attitude and your insults off my page. End of discussion before it starts. I'll be glad to nominate the article for deletion. Not a problem. It's already been deleted once, did you even know that, which is why it was redirected (which is in accordance with the soap project) I'm sure it can be deleted again. Before it was a speedy delete, I'll just nominate now for a full delete. By the way, talk to me like this again and you will be reported for gross incivility. ] (]) 22:30, 3 February 2008 (UTC):
::Talk to you like what tell you to calm down, and try to catch your ear in a brash way because you '''''know''''' you wouldn't listen to me anyway because you are dead set on what you believe in? Am I right or am I wrong? If I'm wrong report me then.--] (]) 22:37, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
:::Article's nominated. Nothing you can say or do now. Your behavior is noted. ] (]) 22:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


<s>Your account is currently blocked for one week, though depending on how discussions go at the SSP page, this may be extended to indefinite.</s> It appears that based on discussions at the SSP page, your block has now been extended to indefinite. Please find something else to do on the internet. We are trying to build an encyclopedia here, and your assistance is no longer desired. --]]] 03:24, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
==Las Vegas==
Danny belived Delinda when she said that they were still married at the annulment party.You should watch the episodes before. you make edits.] (]) 23:03, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
:I did, three times. She said "they're still married" and he said "Really? Noooooo!" We've discussed it on the talk page, you should see there before making edits that remove VERIFIED information. ] (]) 23:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
You did't watch the episode.After delinda told danny that they were still married he said "cooper is going to be pissed" and then she said" but mike and piper aren't".] (]) 15:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


==Sock puppetry block==
I've waited a week, still no references for the rest of the episodes. Where are they? You're the one who insisted past episodes still need a reference, so what's taking so long to add them? ] (]) 21:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
<div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''blocked indefinitely''' from editing in accordance with ] for {{#if:|'''{{{reason}}}'''|repeated ]}}. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|] <sup>]</sup> 03:17, 9 April 2008 (UTC)|}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3 -->
:It's not my job to go back and find references, it's only my responsibility to make sure what is put there now that I'm here is correct and referenced. Your comments are uncivil and grounds for being reblocked. You've been warned about this, you should heed the warnings. ] (]) 23:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
::It helps Misplaced Pages to add reliable references. It hurts Misplaced Pages to remove them. The fact that there are thousands and thousands of articles that are unverified or undersourced is a problem, not a rationale for removal of references. WP:V is one of our three core policies. Yet, I have now seen quite a few post by you where your logic is along the lines of "well since other things aren't fully referenced" or "since you haven't referenced these things" that means references can/should be removed. That argument is the equivalent of saying "This street has a lot of litter on it, therefore I should be allowed to litter". Actually, it's worse than that. Since the references already exist what you're doing is reaching into garbage cans and strewing litter on a street that was already cleaned up. Your haranguing of Kellyana here to add references fits in this analogy well too. She's another pedestrian on the same littered street. You're now bothering here because she hasn't cleaned up the communal street? Please stop this whole illogical line of attack. You obviously care about the articles you are involved with. If you just keep a few of our policies in mind, which keeps this place a reliable encyclopedia and not something else, you will avoid all these arguments and drama.--] (]) 00:35, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


See ] for evidence. ] <sup>]</sup> 03:17, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sami and EJ.png)==
Then why are the old but "good" references deleted from past episodes? That's what I'm trying to find out but you guys don't seem to want to answer! ] (]) 03:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).
:Because someone else removed them, not me. If they've been removed it was done improperly and incorrectly. I returned several references but before references weren't even being put. I can only address what I see, not what I don't see. Just listen to Fuhghettaboutit because he's an admin and he is in charge of enforcing the rules. ] (]) 14:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 12:03, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
== IP harrassment ==


== Car5ly85/Randy ==
If it happens again, let me know, or post at ], and your talk page can be semi-protected to stop IPs editing it for a while. --]] 01:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
:Thank you. ] (]) 01:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


She was actually telling the truth and the reason that i know this is because she's my cousin and she's doesn't lie to anyone. You probaruly had issues with her in the past but she doesn't like being called a lier. --] (]) 03:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
==Source Question ==
Have you ever heard of the site http://www.afterelton.com/blog? I have someone using it as a source, to reference a pretty big statement. With the statement being as big as it is, I want to make sure it's a reliable source. I'm only asking you because you clearly know TV and I haven't heard of the site before. It looks like a blog(unreliable) to me. Thanks DJS--] (]) 04:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
:Definitely an unreliable blog. Interesting for sure, but still a blog which is first and foremost unreliable. ] (]) 23:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
::I just saw this, so I'm late butting in. But blogs from commentators/critics/editors known as reliable in their field from websites that are considered reliable are allowed on Misplaced Pages, sort of like . AfterElton.com is a reliable source, as is ], of course (a source that I use often). ]'s blogs, of AfterEllen.com, for instance, would be considered reliable. Just wanted to point that out. ] (]) 05:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
:::I'm not sure I agree with that statement. I work around TV sites often, and I have never heard of that site until days ago. I'll let others reply. Thanks DJS--] (]) 16:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


== ]. == == Lucas From DAYS ==


So when somebody else change Lucas' last name to Horton, it's OK. But when ''I'' do it, something gets said to me. WTF IS UP WIT THAT?! ] (]) 00:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Right you are... sorry about that. I've blocked him for 55 hours. · ] <sup>]</sup> 02:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stefano 190x143.jpg)==
:Bless you for pointing it out. :) · ] <sup>]</sup> 02:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 05:02, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
== Thanks ==


== I miss you and Misplaced Pages is generally poorer as a result of your absence ==
...for . Seems like you ... is this the first time? ] (]) 03:28, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
:I have some IP that keeps violating my page but this tweedle seems to be new. A 24 hour block seems rather short for his violations, don't you think? ] (]) 03:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


Please come back. That is all. ] (]) 07:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
::He's a sock of ], who's evidently tweaked off that I declined his unblock, then protected his page when he came back with another, frivolous request right afterwards. If you look at his history you'll see why he's been blocked indefinitely. ] (]) 05:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
: Why would you want someone who was found to be disruptive by using sock puppets come back? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


==Orphaned non-free media (Image:CiaraBrady2.jpg)==
== Warnings ==
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 05:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
See ] for user warnings. <font style="color:Blue;">'' ''']'''<sup>(])</sup><sub>(])</sub> ''</font> 02:31, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
:Thank you. ] (]) 02:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


==Orphaned non-free media (Image:Faquir.jpg)==
== Protection ==
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 05:08, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
I don't think it is needed. The IP's edit on your talk was just a rambling rationale for reverting your edit . It wasn't related to the earlier abuse, and it's in a very different IP range. --]] 03:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


==Orphaned non-free media (Image:JohnnyRoman.jpg)==
== What is Wrong? ==
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 05:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
I put what Alina is mostly known for! What else do you want? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:54, 10 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:See ] she has no notability to have an article in an encyclopedia. ] (]) 00:56, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
==]==
The twins who played this character previously, their article survived an AfD ]. So sadly precedent would seem to say these very young child actors are notable. ] (]) 00:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
:The twins had a long history. This child has been an actor for a minute and a half with only 2 episodes in one show and one month on Days and has been fired. Notability per guidelines do not exist. As for Ava and Olivia, they had notability based on the honor of receiving a contract and being under contract as the youngest child actors ever. There a huge difference. But I can always put the article up for deletion the old fashion way. ] (]) 01:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
::Yes, AfD would be the best way to go on this. ] (]) 01:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
:::I'm trying but having a devil of a time. I knew how to do it one way but was told that was wrong and now I'm completely confused as to what step 2 is. ] (]) 01:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


==Orphaned non-free media (File:CiaraBrady2.jpg)==
But she hasn't been in just 2 episodes! This coming Wednesday will be her 18th episode! And I'm more than certain that she will get more roles. She is the daughter of actors!
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 05:22, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
::::Go to ] and fill in the required info using <nowiki>{{subst:afd2 | pg=Alina Foley | cat=B | text=Reason the page should be deleted}} ~~~~</nowiki>. Then goto and use <nowiki>{{subst:afd3 | pg=Alina Foley}}</nowiki>. ] ] 01:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


== File:Ejsavessami.jpg listed for deletion ==
:::::Got it all fixed now. ] ] 01:21, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Idw --> ] 20:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


== ] nomination of ] ==
]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "]").


Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).


You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
== Cousins field ==


'''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Why didn't anybody tell me that until now? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
==Orphaned non-free image File:Philip Kiriakis.jpg==
:Don't know. It's there right above the relatives field. ] (]) 01:21, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).
== All in the Family ==
] article confirms the statement. History Bites, is therefore the source. ] (]) 21:08, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
:An unsourced article cannot be the source for information in another article. See ] for clarification. ] (]) 23:05, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


'''PLEASE NOTE:'''
In this case, I know the ''All in the Family'' television series inside out and I have personally seen the ''Talkin' Turkey'' episode of the ''History Bites'' series. So, I could be the source. ] (]) 02:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
::Check policy. You can't claim "I know" as reference. It's not allowed at Misplaced Pages and you can be blocked for adding stuff based on "me" as a referenced especially when citing it as a reference. ] (]) 02:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
----


* I am a ], and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
{{talkback|Pairadox}}
* I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
You like using this new toy you found :) ] (]) 02:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
* If you receive this notice ''after'' the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
* To opt out of these bot messages, add <code><nowiki>{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}</nowiki></code> to your talk page.
*If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off ] and leave a message on ].


:Well, primarily I like keeping discussions together, but if one can have a bit of fun along the way... :D ] (]) 03:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 00:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
==Sorry==
==Orphaned non-free image File:Philip Kiriakis.jpg==
Sorry I wasn't around to help you, I was in Florida all weekend. As I see now, Bleek25 has been blocked for good reasons. Also I can see, he reverted your edits and mine several times without discussing. I haven't read the Las Vegas Talk page yet, but I will. Thanks DJS --] (]) 06:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
:No problem. We were supposed to go this weekend but we really weren't needed and I have company coming so I thought it better to stay home. It was only cup quals so our time would be limited. I don't know what Bleek's problem is. He's pissed at me for other people's reverts and that he reverted more than 3 times. Just keep an eye on the page. It's funny how it's only when he's around that there's a problem. ] (]) 01:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).
== Article protection ==


'''PLEASE NOTE:'''
You really can't proactively protect articles until and unless they get hit again. At least I don't think so.


* I am a ], and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
Probably very soon, I am going to request that he be considered banned by the community. Six months of blocking him indefinitely haven't changed one thing about him. It won't have a practical effect except to require that any edit he makes be reverted. And just show how gone our patience with him is. ] (]) 04:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
* I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
:Okay, thanks. He was back again under another soap's name fan. I think he's even back again but I can't prove it. There's an editor who claims to be from California but edits at 3 am California time. It may be coincidence but maybe not. I'll let you know. Thanks for any help. ] (]) 04:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
* If you receive this notice ''after'' the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
* To opt out of these bot messages, add <code><nowiki>{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}</nowiki></code> to your talk page.
*If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off ] and leave a message on ].


The two reverts you guys did seem to have stopped those vandals (I don't think they're Grant. Not yet). I'll keep an eye on it; if I'm not available put a request in at ]. ] (]) 02:28, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 05:32, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
== Episode counts ==


== ] nomination of ] ==
Hello... sorry to disturb, but I came across a post you made at Danigro89's talk page. FYI, it is not appropriate to update the episode count for a series prior to the episode in question actually airing, and reverting such changes is not considered vandalism. The accepted custom is to wait until it airs, as we cannot predict whether or not the event will actually happen until it does. By way of comparison, let's say we had an article about the space shuttle that said "<s>''Atlantis''</s>The space shuttle is scheduled to launch at 8 PM EST on February 12th." We certainly wouldn't change the article to say "<s>''Atlantis''</s>The space shuttle '''launched''' at 8 PM EST on February 12th" hours - or in the case of some of Danigro's edits, ''a day'' - in advance of the actual event.) Hope this helps. --''']'''''<small><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></small>'' 06:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
:I have no freakin clue what you are talking about. I don't watch anything titled Atlantis (I hate all Sci-Fi Star Trek related shows, isn't that what Atlantis is) so you're not making any sense. ] (]) 14:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
::"'']''" is one of the three remaining US space shuttles... although I can see the possibility for confusion with '']''. Sorry if the use of a shuttle name confused things... I've reworked my example to remove it. The point still stands, however - changing episode counts prior to the episode airing is not appropriate, and reverting said changes is not vandalism. Cheers. --''']'''''<small><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></small>'' 17:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
:::Oh, that Atlantis. That one I know. I thought you were talking about the show. I find Misplaced Pages an odd entity. You hear two different things from two different people. I don't care one way or another it's all a matter of preference to editors in cases like this. Yesterday I saw it said it was okay to put an end date for a character even though they are still appearing on a show, so there seems to be a lack in consistency. Thanks anyway and thanks for clearing that up. ] (]) 17:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw --> ] (]) 05:27, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
== Confused ==
==Orphaned non-free image File:Abe Carver.jpg==
I'm so confused. You said that there was two head writers when Tony was created and not Pat Falken Smith alone and that we do not know which of the writers who created him. But two writers were writing when Caroline Brady was created, Sheri Anderson & Maggie DePriest. It does not say which one of the writers who created her.


<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).
And also Stefano was created by Pat Falken Smith and only her alone, according to the article. Why is that not the same for Tony? Did the other writer leave before Stefano was created and after Tony & Roman were created?


'''PLEASE NOTE:'''
Also some unreliable sources and Misplaced Pages states that Sheri Anderson and Maggie DePriest were co-head writers from April 1982 to September 1984. I just need this cleared up ] (]) 12:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
:I saw the edit summaries and think I know what was meant. When Tony was created, 1981, there was more than one head writer during that time, not two co-head writers like Sheri and Maggie, two entirely separate writing teams. Gary Tomlin & Michelle Poteet Lisanti were around until October of 1981 followed by Pat Smith. Which created him? It's impossible to know without external sources of the actual date Tony arrived in Salem to pinpoint who his creator was. It is highly unlikely Pat Smith created Tony since she was only there for 2 months in 1981, it could have been, most likely was, her predecessors. However, there is no way to know that for certain unless he arrived well prior to Smith taking over.


* I am a ], and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{tlp|helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
:As for Caroline, the team of DePriest and Anderson are jointly credited (no writer in a pair of head writers is ever credited as a single for creating a character. It's not done) because she was created in the middle of their tenure so it's obvious they created her.
* I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
* If you receive this notice ''after'' the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
* To opt out of these bot messages, add <code><nowiki>{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}</nowiki></code> to your talk page.
*If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off ] and leave a message on ].


:As for Stefano, Smith was the only writer when he appeared, therefore, obviously she created him. We've had this issue come up before which is why I would delete any writer without source from Tony or Roman. Source is imperative when adding information to articles. ] (]) 17:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
::Ok I see what you mean now. First I thought that KellyAna meant that Pat was co-writing with someone at the time Tony was created. Like Sheri & Maggie was co-writing. I see what you mean now. And that decision is for the best of course. As long as the exact dates are not known it is best not to have any mention. It wouldn't look good if the creator is said to be "either Gary Tomlin & Michelle Poteet Lisanti or Pat Falken Smith"
::Though I am still a little confused about Bo. KellyAna said Sheri wasn't even head writer when he was created. He was created after Shawn & Caroline somewhere in the spring of 1983. Wasn't Sheri & Maggie the HWs until October 1984 when DePriest left Sheri & Thom Racina? ] (]) 19:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
:::Okay, I found the problem, Sheri Anderson is listed two different ways. If you look at her page, she's not listed as a head writer. If you look at the Days page, she is. It's a matter that needs sources. I won't be able to look for them, maybe you or Kelly can. I'm limited right now in my access. Sorry I can't be more help. ] (]) 20:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 17:34, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
==What did I do exactly==
==Orphaned non-free image File:Belle Black.jpg==
Sorry, but I'm confused about what I did that was wrong? Would you like to clue me in? I just added soap to the infobox title on the Courtney Matthews page. ] (]) 17:33, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
:Yep, if you just add "soap" the box is incomplete. Your best bet is to copy the original template and put it in instead of just adding a word. ] (]) 18:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).
==Carly Corinthos Jacks==


'''PLEASE NOTE:'''
Carly's name is Corinthos Jacks. Check out the ABC Page and click on Character Bio's and then you shal see Carly CORINTHOS Jacks. I'm Sorry for correcting a mistake. Why are you so mean to me. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:47, 17 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Doesn't matter what the site temporarily says, see the ] policy. I'm not "mean to you" I follow policy which includes following guidelines, not vandalizing pages, and not uploading illegal images. ] (]) 18:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
::No U dont. You are mean. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


* I am a ], and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{tlp|helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
==Carly Corinthos Jacks II==
* I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
* If you receive this notice ''after'' the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
* To opt out of these bot messages, add <code><nowiki>{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}</nowiki></code> to your talk page.
*If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off ] and leave a message on ].


Are you Crazy? The policy is there all right but you are the Fricking one who changes it. UNDERSTAND! I'm not going agiants policy by CORRECTING something. I should correct you UGLY LOSER!<small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:37, 17 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:The policy says common names are to be used, not married names and her common name is Corinthos. You've been reported again for gross incivility. ] (]) 18:40, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
:: her common name is Corinthos Jacks. It was stated on the ABC General Hospital Website.
:::No, it is not. You need to read policy and stop this vandalizing. ] (]) 18:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
:::I stopped but you have been really unfair. IT IS CARLY CORINTHOS JACKS. ABC, the people who control the soap have credited Laura Wright on the credits and on the website as Carly Corinthos Jacks or Carly Jacks.


Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 05:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
==Please understand==
==Orphaned non-free image File:BbasShawnD.jpg==


<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).
If you can change the page as Carly Corinthos Jacks and keep it like that until she changes her name (again), I will never bother you or EVER make another edit. Please. I PROMISE! I KEEP MY PROMISES.
:No, per WIKIPEDIA guidelines, she stays Corinthos. PERIOD. Policy dictates her name, nothing more. ] (]) 19:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


'''PLEASE NOTE:'''
== Charmed pics ==


* I am a ], and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{tlp|helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
sorry for uploading the illegal pics. had no idea i couldn't do that. was just trying to make the pages better. ] (]) 19:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
* I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
:No problem. It was your first offense so no harm, just please don't do it again and if you have questions, feel free to ask, I'll be happy to help. ] (]) 19:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
* If you receive this notice ''after'' the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
* To opt out of these bot messages, add <code><nowiki>{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}</nowiki></code> to your talk page.
*If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off ] and leave a message on ].


==I'm Sorry==


Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 05:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
I never meant harm. Please unreport me. I just wanted to make corections. Friends? Truce OK. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:No truce. No unreport. You keep ILLEGALLY moving pages and refuse to stop. That's vandalism. You're continually going against policy and personally attacking me when I am only trying to keep WIKIPEDIA clean and within guidelines. Your page moves are causing issues as are all the pages you created just to redirect to Carly's page. You need to step back and take a time out, if it takes an admin to do that by reporting you that's fine with me. ] (]) 19:10, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:01, 19 February 2023

Welcome to my talk page

  • If you post a message on this page, I'll reply on this page.
  • If I've left you a message on your talk page, I will watch it for your response, so please reply there. RESPONSES LEFT HERE WILL BE MOVED TO YOUR PAGE.
  • Please sign and date your comments by inserting four tildes (~~~~) at the end.

Credit goes to Pairadox for the big orange banner

Archive

Archives

  1. Archive 1 August 2007 thru October 2007
  2. Archive 2 November to December 31 2007
  3. Archive 3 January 2008 to February 2008
  4. Archive 4 March 2008 to

Nicole Walker

Listen, you. Stop altering the Nicole page with false information. I have asked you nicely. Now you are just being annoying.


Apology

I don't know how to reply on "my page." I am sorry for my comment and question on the EJ Wells talk page that were so inappropriate that they had to be immediately deleted. Your time is valuable and I should mind my own business and not bother you. NBK1122 (talk) 03:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Grant Chuggle now on LTA

To bring back a brief blast from what I hope will always remain the past, I have taken the trouble to create an entry at LTA for Grant, in case he returns. This way you can include the link with any AIV report to save the trouble of explaining him to another admin. Daniel Case (talk) 20:18, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome back

Welcome back, hope all is well! — TAnthony 23:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

As well as can be expected. LOL. Good, or maybe bad, news is I went to the doctor today and found out why the mood swings and really really bad moods. I don't have allergies, I have a roaring sinus infection. Not making excuses, I did what I did, but at least I got an answer to why. How's life as an unemployed person in LA? KellyAna (talk) 23:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm glad that you're getting to the bottom of things. I have suffered from sinus infections myself and I know that they're no fun! Do you trust the doctor? I had to go through 3 or 4 doctors before I found one who I really felt was understanding things, and then once I found a good one, I've stuck with him for years.  :)
BTW, one other small piece of "course correction" advice. Please be very careful with what you put into edit summaries. Sometimes they can get you into even more trouble than actual comments, because they show up more quickly if someone is doing a quick scan of your contribs: KellyAna (talk · contribs). So I recommend that you be scrupulous about keeping the summaries limited to the content, and don't refer to other users at all. You're doing a good job reverting bona fide vandalism, but be careful to only use the word "vandalism" in an edit summary if you're reverting something really blatant (like the editor that changed "son" to "daughter"). That's definitely vandalism. However other edits, where people seem to be making good faith changes that are just wrong, it's not okay to refer to them as vandalism. A revert may still be appropriate, but it would be better to use some other edit summary such as "reverting unsourced material" or "fixing", or when in doubt, the nice neutral "copyediting" is always safe. :) Just giving you a heads-up, --Elonka 00:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
To be honest, it's too soon to tell about the doctor. Knowing that Claritan isn't going to help an infection did make sense and the "mood swing" comment didn't until I looked it up. He explained the combination of an infection with the wrong medicine and the proximity to the brain and pain effecting moods, yada yada yada.... I guess it makes sense in a way, I have been in a lot of pain but I thought it was because the world bloomed all at once without warning and then we had close to a week of rain. I don't know anymore, I just want the pain to stop and the moods to go back to normal because this isn't working.
Now, about "vandalism." I didn't think I had used that word tonight except for the guy who called Lorenzo Lamas a girl. But maybe I did.
I am sorry for what I said to you. The infection is no excuse, we should control our bodies, not our bodies control us. The head pain (my face hurts if I bite down with my front teeth), the wrong medicine, the lack of ability to breath are factors but they aren't an excuse for how I treated you. I make no excuses, I should have walked away rather than been such a bitch. I'm sorry. Please accept my apology. I can't guarantee I won't do it again, that would be a lie, but I can say I'll try not to. KellyAna (talk) 00:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Apology

I knew I'd misclicked and reverted your edits to the 3RR noticeboard, but I originally thought I must have accidentally hit the rollback button. I just noticed that it was actually twinkle's vandalism button, so I wanted to apologize for the edit summary even though I'd rolled myself back within a few seconds. --OnoremDil 03:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

You're all good. Thanks for taking the time to apologize, that's really nice. A lot of people wouldn't do that. I appreciate that you did. Have a good night and thanks again. KellyAna (talk) 03:34, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Politeness

I said "polite and friendly." This doesn't cut it. Please read WP:AGF. --Elonka 04:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

This is getting WAY TOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MUCH. I was nice. I didn't snark. You are "holding me to too high a standard" and by your standards I'll never cut it. I'm going to go cry myself to sleep because I can't, I just can't live up to your new found standards. I was not impolite. I WASN'T. Why are you being mean? Going to cry now because YOU told me to warn him about the April Fools thing. Maybe you should have done it instead of telling me to do it.KellyAna (talk) 04:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
If I would have done it, I would have posted something like, "Hah, cute April Fools joke on your userpage. Too bad you can't keep it there for awhile, but it does kind of run afoul of WP:USER. Just thought I'd drop you a reminder about it. I look forward to reading more about you, the editor, when you update it!" (note: This doesn't mean I want you to copy/paste, I'm just suggesting a different kind of tone. But you gotta write whatever feels sincere to you) --Elonka 04:53, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
I have no sense of humor, I hate April Fools and got a man fired for pulling an April Fools joke. I was nice to the best of my ability based on what you said to tell him, you need to stop holding me to some ridiculously impossible standard that I will never live up to. You should have done it yourself and not chastized me for not doing it your way. If it really is an April Fools joke, it's not funny. KellyAna (talk) 04:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
For what it's worth, I feel the same about 80% of the April Fools jokes I see.  ;) But you really have to work on your courtesy. --Elonka 05:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Gina Von Amberg

Thank you so much for that spelling correction! It has been bothering me for quite some time! Rm994 (talk) 18:42, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. KellyAna (talk) 19:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

The Walker Family

Why did you undo all my contributions? Paul, Fay, and Taylor need their own pages and now they are gone. RionDC (talk) 19:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Minor characters with little to no notability have no place in an encyclopedia. These pages were previously merged or deleted and do not belong on Misplaced Pages. This is not a fan site, it is an encyclopedia. When notability is not there, pages get removed. KellyAna (talk) 19:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Want me to block him now? Scarian 19:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Yes please. He's being uncivil and removing valid content along with creating unnecessary previously merged or deleted pages AND I am 99% sure he's a sock. Thank you. KellyAna (talk) 19:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Bah, I gave him a block for 24 hours. Maybe he'll calm down after that. Keep up the good work and happy editing! Scarian 19:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. I'm curious to see if NikoSwavae00 (talk · contribs) now shows up. They were editing the same brand new pages that I redirected back to the main Days page. Grant Chuggle (talk · contribs) used to delete any mention of retcons so it makes me really suspicious. I guess I'll just have to be vigilante tonight. KellyAna (talk) 20:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

I have no idea. I didn't really pay so much attention to the content but to the fact that RionDC was doing things he shouldn't have been doing. I'll take a look and see if I can spot any similiarities. Scarian 16:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

- Could be grounds in itself for an WP:SSP. But you'd need to find harder similiarities than just editing the same article. Sorry I couldn't be of any more help. Message me if you need anything else! Scarian 16:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Morgan Hollingsworth

Why was the page deleted? Reid Hochstedler 17:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

The page was deemed unnecessary as she is not notable by Misplaced Pages standards. She's a minor character and this is an encyclopedia, not a fan site. Minor characters don't warrant pages. KellyAna (talk) 17:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
I disagree, I believe she is notable. The character has been involved in story lines which could be considered central to the show, e.g. Campus Rapist, Ford Decker death, ... I will reinstate the page and add a notability tag, if other people questions her notability I will delete the page. Reid Hochstedler 17:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reidhoch (talkcontribs)
Well, several others with more experience than you or I decided the page should be redirected to the main Days page. If you reinstate a deleted page, you will be flagged. Her page has already been deleted. Adding back a deleted page is a violation of Misplaced Pages policy. Consider this a warning. KellyAna (talk) 17:23, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
I can agree with creating a list page for minor characters. Thank you for not being irrational. Reid Hochstedler 17:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reidhoch (talkcontribs)

Wiccan!

Uhhh, that's about all I had to say...sorry. Blizzard Beast 19:42, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Okay. I'm confused. Am I needed to work a spell or something? KellyAna (talk) 19:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Shell 22:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


You've been repeatedly asked to stop the personal attacks and maintain civility. Calling good faith edits vandalism and the dropping a vandalism warning on the editor's page isn't maintaining civility; you've been specifically asked before to stop referring to contributions you don't like as vandalism. I have blocked your account for 24 hours. When you return, please remember that you can always step away from Misplaced Pages for a bit if you don't feel you can respond in a calm and civil manner. Shell 22:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KellyAna (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please, seriously, explain what personal attacks I made. Someone claiming to remove content that they own which you cannot own date information? How is that not vandalism? I feel that what I did was in good faith and not personal attacks. Seems as though others can call things vandalism or call dates their work but I cannot revert removal of mass amounts of verified content. I, further, don't appreciate the false accusations of a "need to step away" as I was only doing what I've done for months and NEVER been warned about. I was not even afforded a cursory "this might not be the way to do something" even though I believe what I did was correct and did not violate civility. The revert of removal of mass content has always been reverting vandalism, since when is it not. The editor removed content claiming it as his own, that's not allowed.

Decline reason:

I do this with a somewhat heavy heart. Under her former username, I had helped her out a lot in her early days here and it was quite fulfilling to watch someone you'd mentored a little grow and develop. I was stunned by the first block, but I have long trusted Elonka and I should say that the way she is handling this is vindicating many of us who supported her RfA a few months ago. Reading her explanation below, especially the bit about the harassing emails, really makes me sad. Kelly, don't do this. If you have a roaring sinus infection it might be a good idea to just sit back and do something else until you feel better, even after the block expires, as it and the medication cannot be helping your mood. Harassing emails is serious business ... this gets people banned. I don't want Kelly to be one of them, as she is capable of so much. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I support the block. KellyAna had been cautioned, by me, that it was uncivil to refer to good faith edits as vandalism. Jason47a is an editor with whom she was involved in a prior dispute, and had issued personal attacks towards. She had also been blocked for those attacks. Jason47a noted a page on Misplaced Pages, List of Days of our Lives producers and writers, which was unsourced. He added a source to the page, which was his own personal website. KellyAna removed that source as unreliable. Jason47a consulted me (Elonka) for advice, and I counseled him that per WP:V, unsourced information could be removed by any editor. He could have removed large portions of the page, but instead he simply modified some dates and removed some details. Then KellyAna reverted him, called it "vandalism" in the edit summary, and even worse, put a vandalism warning on his talkpage. This was inappropriate on multiple levels, and KellyAna's actions violated multiple policies, from Misplaced Pages:Verifiability to Misplaced Pages:Civility and Misplaced Pages:Don't bite the newcomers. She has already been blocked multiple times just over the last week or so, and received cautions from numerous editors and administrators. I actually think that a 24-hour block is quite lenient at this point. If KellyAna wants to continue participating on Misplaced Pages, she needs to abide by policies, and she needs to show that she can work in a cooperative and collegial manner with other editors. --Elonka 00:25, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Extension of block

I am extending the block to 48 hours. Jason47a informed me that someone matching KellyAna's communication style had sent him a harassing email. I asked him to forward the email to me, and I can confirm that it is from the same Yahoo address which KellyAna previously used to write harassing emails to me, and that it has the same communication style. Along with extending the block, I am also disabling email for this account. If any reviewing admins would like to see the email, please contact me or Jason47a, thanks.

KellyAna, stop this, before the block is extended even further. --Elonka 00:49, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Page unprotection

I have unprotected the page since someone wanted to post an SSP report here. KellyAna, you are allowed to post here again, but please make sure all comments are in compliance with the civility policy. I may also be willing to lift the block, so that you can post at the SSP page, but I would need assurances from you that you would be able to moderate your behavior. --Elonka 02:30, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Listen, I'm okay with the 24 hour block. That's fine. I said it, I did it, I was the bitch that I am (although I didn't mean to violate policy, but it is how it is). What I'm really pissed about is I didn't "abuse the Misplaced Pages email system." Jason's email is available on his site and it has been since we first tussled nearly 2 years ago on NBC. Quite honestly, since I've seen the SSP, I don't think unblocking me is a good idea because I'll likely tell DJS, a one time confirmed sock puppeteer himself CarsGm5 (talk · contribs), where to "stick it." I know when I "need a time out" and with as pissed as I am, a time out until tomorrow morning is probably a good idea. Leave it for 24, I'm pissed and a bitch right now, leaving it is best. KellyAna (talk) 03:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Leave it for 48. I just read Daniel's comments and just cried. He is so sweet and always has been. He's right, I need the break and a block is just how it needs to be done. Or maybe unblock and see if I can control. Irregardless, I'm okay with it staying. I can piss off a lot of people but disappointing Daniel is too much. KellyAna (talk) 03:25, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Question

Is it allowable to link a video or upload pictures to prove identity? I took them, or was in the picture. It's visual proof of who I am and who Irish is and why we talk to each other off of Wiki through our other site. KellyAna (talk) 03:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Sure, you can upload a reasonable amount of fair use images. But better would be if you could come up with a plausible explanation for why you use a similar writing style, and you're never online at the same time. --Elonka 03:12, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
That's Irish presenting Ali the pony. That's me next to her. KellyAna (talk) 03:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I don't think you're the same person. Irishlass updated the Gina Von Amberg article months ago...you made the spelling change a few days ago. If you were her, why didn't you make the change then? I may not agree with everything other editors say and do, but I will stick up for someone when they are wronged. Sorry you're having such a hard time. Rm994 (talk) 04:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

As I am not allowed to defend myself against DJS's accusations, why is a video of the two of us so offensive? No, Ali didn't call us by our names because until we met her here, she didn't know our names. Irish with Cameron. Me with Cameron. It's easy to see this is taken the same day if you look at what people are wearing.
And thanks Rm994, that's really cool. KellyAna (talk) 04:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
KellyAna, you are allowed to defend yourself. If you are able to promise that you will present your comments in a civil way, I would be willing to unblock you, with the understanding that for the next 48 hours (or whatever remains of the block) that you will limit yourself to posting only at the SSP page and here on your talkpage. --Elonka 04:34, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you but I don't want that. I want to honestly serve my time. If I don't just because someone accused me of being a sock it's not right. It's killing me, I've already seen vandalism to the Billie Reed article so I know I can't stay to just the two pages. Okay, so removing that Billie raped Bo might not be vandalism to you, but it is to me and it shouldn't be removed because she did rape him. Besides, Daniel is right and I hate that I disappointed him. I mean, I really hate it. He's a really good guy and that just cuts that I disappointed him. I know DJS is just being vindictive and I'll prove him wrong but I'll do it when I'm allowed to edit, not under special circumstances. KellyAna (talk) 04:42, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Changed my mind

Oh, this comment is just wrong when someone who I have had minimal contact with can't even offer a comment ON MY TALK PAGE without being attacked, he didn't even comment on the sock puppet stuff. That's not right and not fair. I'm used to Irish and I being accused but to accuse Rm just because he's got a random edit to a Days page and a school, that's not right. KellyAna (talk) 04:55, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

KellyAna, I think I took care of it. Not that it actually bothers me really. I sort of think its funny. Not sure what he's thinking, but as you are well aware, I am not a sock, nor are we the same person :). I would like to be involed with the Days of Our Lives cast page if at all possible. I remember lots of past stars that aren't on the list and would like to contribute. Yes, I have communicated with IrishLass, when I was new to editing. I was so mean to her. I felt like an idiot after she explained the rules. Feel better :) Rm994 (talk) 05:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. I dont want you falsely accused, that's not right. What's so funny is DJS and Blackwatch are so socks but I've never reported them. I don't have the time to play that game but he apparently does. We've always edited the same pages, she watches my as because I'm a bitch but we were cleared before. Whatever, I can't do anything more than I've done because I'm blocked which I'm cool with. Thanks for having my back.KellyAna (talk) 05:21, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

No problem, and thank you as well. I hope we can work on these pages together to make them great. Rm994 (talk) 05:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

I guess it wasn't taken care of after all. Now I'm supposedly a sock. Oh well. Enjoy the rest of your weekend. Rm994 (talk) 03:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/KellyAna

As you may know, a request for checkuser has been filed to help clear things up in the suspected sockpuppetry case DJS24 filed against you. The checkuser found that you and IrishLass0128 are editing from the same area. An explanation about your off-site relationship with IrishLass0128 is needed in addition to why the two of you have never edited at the same time. AniMate 21:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Re-blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for Incivility, disruption, and posting private correspondence without permission. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Elonka 02:55, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

KellyAna, it appears rather than taking advantage of your unblocked state to go back to editing articles, you instead used it to post uncivil comments at the SSP report, the CheckUser page, and here on your own talkpage. You also appear to have posted what may or may not be someone else's private correspondence. When you posted it at User talk:Daniel Case, I deleted it, and you then reacted by posting it again here at your own talkpage. Both versions have been deleted, and removed from page history. As Daniel Case is an administrator, he will be able to look into the history and still see it. I am also willing to forward any emails that I have received from you or any other accounts associated with yours, to any admins that wish to view them for themselves.

Your account is currently blocked for one week, though depending on how discussions go at the SSP page, this may be extended to indefinite. It appears that based on discussions at the SSP page, your block has now been extended to indefinite. Please find something else to do on the internet. We are trying to build an encyclopedia here, and your assistance is no longer desired. --Elonka 03:24, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Sock puppetry block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

See Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/User:KellyAna(2nd),User:Irishlass0128(2nd) for evidence. Jehochman 03:17, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sami and EJ.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sami and EJ.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:03, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Car5ly85/Randy

She was actually telling the truth and the reason that i know this is because she's my cousin and she's doesn't lie to anyone. You probaruly had issues with her in the past but she doesn't like being called a lier. --Mkk08 (talk) 03:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Lucas From DAYS

So when somebody else change Lucas' last name to Horton, it's OK. But when I do it, something gets said to me. WTF IS UP WIT THAT?! The King Gemini (talk) 00:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stefano 190x143.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stefano 190x143.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

I miss you and Misplaced Pages is generally poorer as a result of your absence

Please come back. That is all. 63.87.104.35 (talk) 07:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Why would you want someone who was found to be disruptive by using sock puppets come back? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.244.91 (talk) 03:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CiaraBrady2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CiaraBrady2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Faquir.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Faquir.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:JohnnyRoman.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:JohnnyRoman.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:CiaraBrady2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:CiaraBrady2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Ejsavessami.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ejsavessami.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 20:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Salem (Days of our Lives)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Salem (Days of our Lives). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Salem (Days of our Lives). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:21, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Philip Kiriakis.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Philip Kiriakis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Philip Kiriakis.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Philip Kiriakis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Children of Days of our Lives

An article that you have been involved in editing, Children of Days of our Lives, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Children of Days of our Lives. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 05:27, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Abe Carver.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Abe Carver.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:34, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Belle Black.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Belle Black.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BbasShawnD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BbasShawnD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)