| Revision as of 21:42, 18 February 2008 editDominic (talk | contribs)Administrators29,558 edits →Incivility: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:18, 2 May 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,133,069 edits →Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| (887 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Message | |||
| Deja Messages Ici Bitte | |||
| | bgcolor = #gray | |||
| | border-color = #black | |||
| | color = #black | |||
| | linkcolor = #orange | |||
| }} | |||
| {{TOCleft}} | |||
| -------------- | -------------- | ||
| {{archivebox| | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #]}} | |||
| == January 2023 == | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| ] Thank you for ] to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you copied or moved text from ] into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Misplaced Pages's content, here or elsewhere, ] does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Misplaced Pages, this is supplied at minimum in an ] at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and ] to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>]</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying --> ] ] 14:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Dynamite == | |||
| == ] moved to draftspace == | |||
| Sure! ] 11:36, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for your contributions to ]. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it has no sources'''. | |||
| ==Episode review== | |||
| I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. | |||
| Why are you adding those? The point of the review is to gain a view or consensus when one isn't clear. There is no real reason to clog it with clear cut cases (unless we want to speed it up, so we don't have to take over a week on some cartoon episodes). ] 16:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *No real disagreement from me on this - you are doing yeoman's work. But in the face of dispute, the proper place to list these is on the episode review page since it provides legitimacy for subsequent redirects and should help avoid flame wars from dedicated fans who are apparently incapable of reading WP guidelines. Remove them from the list, however, if you disagree. ] 16:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yeah, I have add them whenever they receive responses from people other than IPs or the people like Fisher (though I haven't really looked at my list recently). Otherwise, it is just better to let them sit. I won't bother removing the ones you've added, though. ] 16:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Please see more information at ]. | |||
| ==Second Lady of the United States== | |||
| When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ] (]) 19:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| I noticed on the ] AFD page that you are in favor of deleting the article entirely. As noted in my comments on that page, I partially disagree, however, I think the questions raised regarding the article are also applicable to the related similarly-named category, ], which should probably be renamed, although I am not sure if we should wait until the AFD vote on the article is closed before initiating any action with respect to the category. --] 19:38, 2 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| ==Madeline Fitzpatrick Redirect Issue== | |||
| <blockquote>'''Unsourced with unclear claim to notability.'''</blockquote> | |||
| This is quickly turning into a blatant edit war. I'm considering bringing this to the attention of an experienced administrator to review this and see what needs to be done. ] 19:26, 6 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't think it's reached that point yet - discussion first, then mediation after, I'd say. ] 21:58, 6 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| ===Re: Guidelines=== | |||
| My issue is that it seems to be this particular character as opposed to, for example, ]. ] 19:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| ===Poor Redirect=== | |||
| My issue isn't one with ] itself (in fact, I tend to agree that the article lacks notability in that sense), but with the redirect itself. It is fundamentally flawed to redirect a topic to an article that DOES NOT CONTAIN INFORMATION ON THE TOPIC. Redirecting ] to ] or ] is actually more detrimental to the encyclopedic nature of Misplaced Pages than leaving the article as-is. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 19:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| That being said, redirecting to ] would probably be acceptable. Though, such action should also go hand-in-hand with the concurrent redirecting of ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ] to the same place, as none of those articles meet WP:FICT criteria either. Failure to do so would seem to be highly indicative of inherent bias against this single character, and not simply a desire to maintain Misplaced Pages standards (which could itself be considered a violation of ]). ] 21:58, 6 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
| == Lauren Cohen (economist) == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| Your reconsideration at ] AFD would be greately appreciated in light of his renaming and the new arguments presented.--] <small>(]/]/]/]) </small> 19:37, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == An Introduction to the Study of Indian History == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
| You redirected the article ] back to the author page. Where exactly do i find out if a particular book is notable enough to need its own page? ] does not clearly give this information. ] 14:44, 14 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| == Bsharvy == | |||
| </div> | |||
| Is there a way (that doens't require hours of work) to get an admin to look at this user's behavior, hopefully as a prelude to getting rid of him and his disruptive behavior? ] 21:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 --> | |||
| == Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| <section begin="announcement-content" /> | |||
| No, this is not a ]. I have now rewritten the article, with new sources and a section on ]. I have also nominated it for ]. I hope you could reconsider your vote at ]. -- ] 00:44, 24 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :''] '' | |||
| Dear Wikimedian, | |||
| == Big bonnet == | |||
| Big "thanks" for getting "]" deleted. You said it had no references, perhaps you should have checked the talk page, which listed it as coming from ]'s dictionary. It is not a bloody hoax, it is a Scottish folk tradition. | |||
| You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process. | |||
| "Look before you leap" next time.--] 17:35, 24 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the ] to learn more about voting and voter eligibility. | |||
| p.s. For future reference ], where people who actually know about the subject matter in question can comment. | |||
| The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please ]. | |||
| == September 2007 == | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] 04:22, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well. | |||
| == 3rr == | |||
| Did you look at the talk page?? You will see that this an attempt to assert policy. ] 04:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Ok, maybe. But discuss it on the talk page, as the issue doesn't seem to be clear... and if he reverts again, report him to the 3RR noticeboard, as I've warned you both. ] 04:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: Consensus trumps the SPAs that have been focused on this page. The guideline at wp:music is clear and this should be redirected (see the talk). Please protect the page. ] 04:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Who, me? I'm not an admin; I can't. Go request it yourself -- ]. And from looking at the talk page, the issue is far from clear -- so discuss, don't revert. Thanks. ] 04:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Oh, and this: ?? He has every right to do so, if he has an issue, or wants to discuss something with you. Cool down a little, and discuss, don't be uncivil to other users. Thanks. ] 04:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::: 2 established editors v 1 wikistalker does not make the issue ambiguous. I will revert tyvm ] 04:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC): Do you have any idea what you have wandered into? ] 04:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I wouldn't -- if you do, you will be blocked for violating the ] -- this doesn't fall under the exceptions to the rule. Please don't, and discuss on the talk page. ] 04:41, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::This HAS BEEN discussed on the talk page. A bunch of SPAs responded. If you look into it, you will see that a redirect is indeed appropriate. Meanwhile, Alansohn is wikistalking me after his RfC. Soit informé. ] 04:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::I see the discussion, I see no consensus. The act of discussing does not give you the right to revert. And the claim of stalking... I see no evidence of that. If he's stalking you in terms of this specific article, then that hardly counts -- he's watching the article. This'd all be much better if you actually tried discussing with him, please! ] 04:51, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| See ] ] 04:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| On behalf of the UCoC project team,<section end="announcement-content" /> | |||
| :That has no bearing on the fact that he's trying to discuss this, and as far as I can tell, civilly. I suggest you try the same, and try to come to a consensus, because there currently is none, no matter how many times you say there is. I'm going to bed now, so don't expect another reply. ] 04:58, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:RamzyM (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Coordinating_Committee/Election/2024/Previous_voters_list&oldid=26721206 --> | |||
| Your changes to the ] article have been reverted again, the 14th time your decision to undo the article has been reverted, by a total of 11 different editors who disagree with your opinion on this issue, if I count correctly. I am only one of may people who believe that independent notability with multiple reliable and verifiable sources has been established for Conley; you are in a very distinct minority. Once your ] issues with this article have been addressed, I would strongly suggest taking this article to AfD to see if you can demonstrate that notability has not been established here. ] 04:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Robbins Landon and symphony 26; an issue regarding 34, and, Haydn, sym 26 and Sturm und Drang, or no?? == | |||
| Actually, I'm wondering myself- I don't think that section of the article gives a reference for the dates, though I'll look again. It follows them with contrasting quotes from two HCRL works- and I assumed, and should not have. I am beginning to gather that Zaslaw has done research into this dating himself, in fact. | |||
| Hrm. It's from a table at the end of the article entitled "Symphonies (and two other works) of Joseph Haydn with sacred connections according to Landon." That doesn't mean that Landon's dating is used, or if so from when (a revision later in his career, say, since it quotes "Haydn: Chronicle and Works" as well as "The Symphonies of Joseph Haydn". | |||
| (No previews of the Landon books available from Google books- which may prove a useful resource where available, within required limits, that I only began to think about using today...) | |||
| Also interesting and related to a work on which there is as yet no Misplaced Pages article is - well, re Symphony No. 34 in D question-mark: since it seems that Haydn's own listing -in a (the? one of three?) catalog he put together of his symphonies at the end of his life - has the slow movement in second place. | |||
| Which would make ''that'' work (possibly written, not in 1770, but earlier than sym. 26, according to recent sources? - I need to look into why the claim is made that sym. 34 is "the first Haydn symphony in the minor"- if it's in the minor at all, which I now come to doubt- and according to Ethan Haimo's ''Haydn's Symphonic Forms: Essays in Compositional Logic'' (page 43, searchable at Google Books) Haydn's minor-mode symphonies before 1770 were 26 and 39, 34 not in his list...)- a symphony in D major, wouldn't it, if accurate... (depending on whether, as with sym. 26 apparently and some Haydn scores certainly, the manuscript is not yet found, the first published score- with D minor slow movement first- may not have been seen by Haydn, etc. ... - see ''Drei Haydn Kataloge in Faksimile, mit Einleitung und erganzenden Themenverzeichnissen'' by Jens Peter Larsen (1902-1988) as reviewed in ''Music & Letters'', Vol. 27, No. 3 (Jul., 1946), pp. 195-197 -- anyway, the Larsen book reviewed in that article was republished by Pendragon Press in 1979, as "Three Haydn catalogues", ISBN 091872810X.) (Haimo does maintain that 34 opens with a slow movement, though...) | |||
| BTW Zaslaw questions the use of Sturm und Drang to describe symphony 26 and other pre-1770 Haydn symphonies, as the movement in literature (and music) was barely in existence by the time that work was written, and for other reasons (viz. his review of Salomons' recording of the work (Sturm und Drang Symphonies 1766-1768 (Nos.35, 38, 39, 49, 58, 59), ''The Musical Times'' '''124''' (1681): 173-4 (Mar. 1983). Also and more pointedly re: Haydn and Sturm und Drang, see the article by Mark Evan Bonds, "Haydn's 'Cours complet de la composition' and the ''Sturm und Drang''" in the book ''Haydn Studies'', W. Dean Sutcliffe, ed., ISBN 0521580528 (previewable at least in part over google books too. - ] | ] 00:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your incivility== | |||
| What is a sockpuppet? I have no idea what you are talking about? However I found your comment on my talk page offencing and uncivil. A bit of a look at some of the policies turned up ], plus your ] is an opinion essay, not an actual policy. If you are a regular, then you would know that removal of information from someone elses talk page is vandalism. | |||
| BTW, some advice ]. ] 07:20, 27 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| * ] | |||
| I've started an AfD on this - my first! Please post your thought and expand on the reasons to delete. Thanks. -] 16:32, 29 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| =="needs rewrite"== | |||
| Re your comments on ]. Don't let the "keep but rewrite" !voters upset you. A large article may be nominated for deletion, and emerge as a kept stub if conscientious editors decide to ]. An article which is kept, but filled with un-verifyable or NPOV statements can, and usually ought, to be edited free of all such content. ] 03:13, 30 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :HI, thanks for the kind words re: ], I hope it won't bum you out that I changed my !vote to "merge". Cheers, ] 20:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC). | |||
| == Re: your comment on my talk page == | |||
| I'm not interested, frankly, in a pointless war of words with you. However, I will say that it is very telling that you chose to respond to a disagreement over ''content'' with a carefully veiled ''personal'' jibe - that being the insinuation of vandalism on my part. I won't dwell on the insulting nature of your comment, other than to note that a) even the most cursory examination of my contribution history (and absence of blocks and warnings) would demonstrate that I spend an enormous percentage of my time on Misplaced Pages ''removing'' vandalism, and b) you obviously couldn't be bothered to make such an obvious, essential check of said records before hitting "save". It is also interesting to point out that, according to your note on this page, my actions ''"border on vandalism"'' because I am ''"very familiar"'' with Misplaced Pages's policies. However, at the ], you stated that I was ''"unfamiliar"'' with these same policies. Either I'm a really, really quick study (given that the messages are only three minutes apart) or else you're just saying whatever you feel like in order to try to justify your actions. Kind of sucks, really, and it is completely contrary to what this project is supposed to be about. --''']'''''<small><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></small>'' 04:42, 6 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your recent edits== | |||
| Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the ], and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> --] 22:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| {{{1|]]]}}} has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! <br /> Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. | |||
| </div><!-- Template:smile --> | |||
| just made my morning. I just hope this will bring a conclusion and peace can be restored to the universe. ]]] 13:30, 19 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Good Humor''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I notice I'm not the only one who thought your comment at ] was special. Thanks for lightening up the mood in a matter that is difficult for all parties. – ] <sup>]•c</sup> 13:57, 19 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==Hey== | |||
| Yeah, I saw that msg about your 'tirade' at the top of the page. Lol. We'll see what he comes up with. Mop is good but a lot of responsibility and a lot of work. Not for the faint of heart. See ya around! --'''<span style="background:Black;color:White"> ]|]|] </span>''' 15:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Farscape stuff == | |||
| Hi. Could you keep an eye out for a new anon removing clean-up tags from Farscape images and the articles they're in? See: | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| and the user talk pages - these are blocked, but user seem insistent. Blocking admin is ]. Best, ] 12:46, 22 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I may as well just use this section. Do you think another redirection attempt should be taken? It looks like ] is gone, so someone reverting is less likely. ] 21:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, I just saw your on TTN's talk page. My discussion with Gavin.collins at ] might be of interest here. Greetings, – ] <sup>]•c</sup> 18:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Uh...No == | |||
| If you would look at the talk page, you'd see that I'm the only one who has bothered to engage in discussion. Thanks. ] 00:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : Also, if you're going to give me one bullshit warning like that, you should give one to the other party. Until you do, i'm removing it from my talk page. ] 00:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ohhhh...pardon me, I wasn't aware the god of wikipedia had signed on. Tennis Experts blatant edit warring is not also unacceptable? Hmmm, interesting. I was under the impression that edit warring required TWO people. Actually since you involved yourself, that's now THREE of us who were doing it. Give me a break man. ] 00:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==arcane== | |||
| How do you know that the Jan 6, 2001 independent article doesn't meantion the characters?] 17:20, 9 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Thanks for re-directing those pages, at the moment I am editing the pages to improve thier standard as I have on the episode "Eales" (3x01) we have descided we will wait a month to improve the articals (see my talk page) then we will reveiw them and see if they should be kept. So I would like it if you could wait until the articals have been edited before redirecting.--] 23:35, 12 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Sure I will sandbox it but I will not be visiting wikia.--] 11:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Rudeness == | |||
| Is this a good way to talk to someone on wikipedia? "Hey wiggstar, don't wig out, and why do you keep referring to articals? Why not artikals or even Artikel, which would at least be a correct spelling in German." | |||
| :If I have mispelled the word article this is no reason for a personal attack.--] 13:40, 14 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Farscape== | |||
| Your comment here is erroneous and wrong-headed. Are you suggesting that Misplaced Pages policies be ignored simply because, as a fan of the series, you like the episode articles? We have a clear policy of redirection in these instances, a policy that has been amply confirmed. These will be redirected; I suggest you open up an RfA if you are unhappy that policies and guidelines are being applied and followed. Eusebeus 19:07, 14 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :What part is erroneous and wrong-headed? The part where I say that it takes time to edit pages? The part where I reject your argument that valuable information should be redirected on your say-so? You keep pushing the argument that the only reason to keep the pages is ILIKEIT, and I and others keep saying that it takes time to edit these pages. By redirecting them, you cause people who are potential editors to be unable to find the pages and have to redo the same work again and again. These pages ARE important and they WILL be edited to make them better. Come back in six months. But no, you can't wait that long. You've got to keep repeating your same desires to destroy others' work. Go create something instead of destroying what others are doing.] 20:17, 14 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Advertiseing== | |||
| Please stop advertiseing wikia. What they will or will not take is not relivant to wikipedia.] 17:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Revert Kim Possible Movie== | |||
| Please give me a link where the issue was discussed and consensus was reached. Thank you. ] 22:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Kim Possible == | |||
| I'm sorry, but there was clearly merge discussion taking place and most if not all pages were clearly tagged as being part of the discussion. You redirected without merging which not only went against the discussion but ignored it completely. That kind of unilateralism goes against the community ethos of Misplaced Pages. | |||
| If you had attempted to merge it would have been a different picture but as it was you made absolutely no attempt to transfer any information at all. | |||
| ] (]) 09:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Please read ] and use the things.] (]) 16:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located ]. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, ]. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ]. | |||
| On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ] ] 21:05, 22 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==School consensus== | |||
| I've created a project page: ], because of ]. I thought you might want to participate. --] 06:01, 24 November 2007 (UTC)== | |||
| ==Official thanks, slightly delayed due to post-RfA crash (who knew?)== | |||
| <div style="padding: 5px; style="background-color: #32005B;" border-style: solid; border-width: 3px; border-color: "000000"; font-size: 100%; "> | |||
| <center> | |||
| <div style="margin-top: 3px; padding-top: 9px; padding-bottom: 9px; padding-left: 9px; padding-right: 9px; width: 300px; float: center;">]</div> | |||
| </center> | |||
| <div class="NavFrame" style="padding: 0px; border-style: none; font-size: 100%;"> | |||
| <div class="NavFrame" style="padding: 0px; border-style: none;"> | |||
| <div class="NavHead" style="background: black; text-align: center;"><font color="E4D5E8"><font face="Georgia">Tapadh Leibh ]...</font></font></div> | |||
| <div class="NavContent" style="display: none; text-align: center;"> | |||
| <font color="E4D5E8"><font face="Georgia"><br> | |||
| ...for helping me navigate the waters of my surprisingly peaceful ], which closed successfully with 85 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutral. | |||
| I would particularly like to thank ] and ], my nominators, and everyone who watched the page and ran the tally. | |||
| If there is anything I can do to be of service in the future, please feel free to contact me. | |||
| If you hate RfA thankspam, please forgive me. I promise I won't block you in retaliation for deleting it ;-) | |||
| And forgive me if I need a ] now and then (like now. I'm exhausted!). You wouldn’t want to see me ], now would you? | |||
| Off to flail around with my new mop! (what?!)<br> | |||
| <center><center><font face="comic sans ms">''']</b> ]<font color="FCD73F">♦</font>]'''</font></font> | |||
| <br><font color="#000000"><small>'''This RfA thanks inspired by Neranei's, which was inspired by VanTucky's which was in turn inspired by LaraLove's which was inspired by The Random Editor's, which was inspired by Phaedriel's original thanks.'''</small></font></div></div></div></div> | |||
| == Arwing and Star Fox == | |||
| ] reported you to ] for redirecting ] to ], I think you should talk to him about the edits. --] (]) 15:53, 29 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==I, E.T.== | |||
| Just to make sure that the people like QuizzicalBee don't get upset or anything for now, it seems best to leave the fourteen or so articles. After a little bit, I'm sure we can discuss with the users that are working to improve them about redirecting those that are still non-notable. ] 19:45, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, I just don't want to end up back at square one because of someone getting pissed off. They either don't want their work to have been "a waste of time" or they get so caught up in their fandom that they forget/ignore that this is not a fan site. ] 20:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Ummm... == | |||
| Thanks for showing me how to do it properly, but are you proposing that I be deleted as well? If not, I'd prefer if you left that sort of a thing on my talkpage. ] 20:46, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Thing That Wouldn't Die == | |||
| I'm a bit puzzled by your comments ]. Multiple newspaper reviews have always been enough to satisfy the general notability criterion at ]. What are you looking for, exactly? ]''']''' 20:53, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Do you have a response? ]''']''' 20:24, 2 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Characters of Firefly== | |||
| Recently you contibuted to ]. There is now an ongoing discussion stemming from that AfD ] if you wish to contribute. ] 15:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)]] | |||
| == Merge discussions are not afd's == | |||
| Merge discussions are not deletion debates. Further, as you rightly say, we have to judge all consensus based policies against each other, and I did that, balancing, ], ] and ] against guidelines such as ], ] and ]. Based on our policies, and the guidelines which support those policies, , the consensus in the debate was that the articles could be improved. Whether that process involves merging or cleaning the articles up is not clear; we guide that one possibility is to merge, but that is quite clearly not a rule which must be obeyed. Were I to close that debate as merge, it would cause a fracture and lead to edit warring and drive away contributors. I have to keep in mind ], ] as well as ]. As an admin closing a debate, I am not resolving a dispute. For that you need ]. I am not going to pick sides and state one guideline has primacy over another, indeed that is not my role. I have to weigh the policies against the guidance, the debate against that, and judge consensus. I'd note their is a longstanding consensus that articles do not have to be merged in this manner, established at ], it is something that should grow from editing. Misplaced Pages is not in a rush, there is no ]. I see no reason that I should force this issue by preferring guidance over policy. If all editors edit in line with policy, the matter will resolve itself. Thanks for your concern, ] <small>] </small> 11:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *Oh I see. Looks like we got our wires crossed. You just want to open the debate to continue discussing the issues? That's no problem. ] <small>] </small> 09:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Friends episodes == | |||
| I de-watchlist-ed the Friends LoE so didn't notice you'd done the redirects. I think I've made it perfectly clear that I don't agree with the ''methods'' by which episodes are redirected, though I agree with the ''principle'' for why it happens; a user can write an absurdly long plot summary of an episode and then run off without any intention of explaining to readers why an article for it should exist on Misplaced Pages. I appreciate that you've apologised for how the discussion go out of hand, though one isn't necessary, although I agree we have different views on how an episode can be notable (I check for write-ups of episodes beyond what Entertainment Weekly might have, though include those as well, you seem to want an episode to have incited a killing spree) The problem came when I'd exhausted all possible routes for expanding the tagged episode articles, started redirecting them myself and then ended up ''having to explain myself'' to an admin, leaving myself stuck between a rock and a hard place (granted, some of those outstanding episode articles are borderline notable, like ]). Anyway, I don't plan to go about expanding any more of those articles; it's annoying to have to constantly revert "WHERE IZ TEH TRIVIA????" "contributions". Regarding your suggestion of merging the main characters, I recommend you start a discussion on ]. ] 18:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==FYI== | |||
| In case you don't know, I'm giving you a heads up on this . If you want to comment, let me know on my user page because your page is not in my watchlist. --] (]) 03:55, 8 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Wikiquette alerts == | |||
| Hi! I'd like to see if you and Taric25 can agree on a wording that would communicate the seriousness of your message in a manner that is mutually acceptable. Tariq25 has commented on what would be acceptable (and please note he has not denied the legitimacy of the message). Perhaps you could comment on whether his wording would be acceptable to you. ] (]) 19:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :The hideousness of the behavior is exactly why we need to get the wording issue out of the way. If he and you agree on a wording for the warning he has no choice left but to focus on the warning itself. Best, ] (]) 19:37, 10 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::It is your choice, but I think since you were the one to warn him and you know the case the best, you are really the best spokesman. Sometimes the way we say things can actually get in way of someone hearing us even when we have something important to say (think about the boss who yells, the parent who accuses, or the piano player who bangs out Mozart on the keyboard). | |||
| ::Restating things in a mutually acceptable way would let him ''hear'' your warning more easily and ''may'' prevent things getting to block point. I think the goal here is behavior change. Don't you think it is worth the chance? But as I said, this is your choice. ] (]) 20:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I wanted to let you know that I've marked this WQA alert as stuck. While I am of the opinion that your actions were not uncivil, I would like to let you know that in the future, you could probably avoid having to entertain such (erroneous) accusations so much if you were more diplomatic. While this is not required, it may reduce the amount of conflict you run into. I hope you take this as a learning experience, even if you would not be considered at fault. Regards. --] (]) 21:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Apology == | |||
| Hello Eusebeus, I would like to take this time to apologize to you. During the course of the SSP, I did not realize how quickly an edit war could occur. I realize it was wrong for me to make three reverts in one day, and I should have taken more time to discuss the issue with you. I do not apologize for reporting TTN at SSP in the first place, because I really do believe he is guilty of sockpuppeteering, however, I do apologize for edit warring on his userpage, and I will write him an apology for that on his talk page shortly. | |||
| In the future, I hope we can discuss these types of situations more before they become so problematic. To be perfectly honest, if you would have simply asked me,<br/> | |||
| :"Hi, Taric, I saw you reported TTN at SSP, and I would like to discuss my concerns with you. I have known TTN for a long time, and I realize he is well-known for his disagreements with yourself and others. This is not because he hates you or because he's a jerk; it's simply because he believes in what he's doing. Kindly, would you ''temporarily'' withdraw your claim and discuss it with me? If after we discuss it, you still believe that TTN is guilty of sockpuppeteering or if the current AfD closes with a decision to delete or merge and you suspect vote fraud, then by all means relist it and/or request checkuser. Thank you.", | |||
| then I would have happily withdrawn the SSP and discussed it with you. By the way, since the AfD ended with a keep, you could have very well convinced me that since Henke37 is not a very active user anyway, it would be much better for me to focus my energy to improve the article rather than use that time on SSP, and if something like that happened again, then I really would have evidence for my case. I hope you will accept my apology and forgive me. Thank you. ] (]) 00:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==very funny== | |||
| hi eusebeus - just wanted to say that i, at least, appreciated your 12/6 summary on ] ... i think i'll stash a copy & a link somewhere in my user space to restore my spirits in times of conflict. ] (]) 18:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == RfArb Workshop == | |||
| Hi Eusebeus, I understand that the request for arbitration has become somewhat frustrating and is slowly dissolving into a fit of mudslinging but I think comments like don't serve to advance the goals of arbitration. In particular I'm concerned that this could be viewed as a personal attack (you are commenting on the contributor, not their contributions) and I think in the long run will not help the case. In particular the relevant essay would be ]. I don't mean to pick on you but reading that comment concerned me somewhat and I thought I should mention it to you. As we're being reminded on occasion, the arbitration isn't about whether the content is right or wrong but about the conduct of both sides of the dispute (supposedly), acting in ways that are against policy during the case will certainly not help prove that "mergists" and their friends are the epitome of decorum. Best of luck. ]]] 18:31, 13 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I did look at her page and I in no way endorse her behavior. My intention with ] was merely to point out that it is difficult to accept anyone's statements that another user is making personal attacks when such a statement is also phrased as a personal attack. I did not mean to imply that every statement you applied to her would necessarily also apply to you or that you were "systematically uncivil, wikilawyerish, trollish, pointy and disruptive". I think you generally do good work and my only goal is to keep you from digging your way into the same hole TTN is being pushed into in the arbcom (I think banning him from even discussing merges and deletions is thoroughly ridiculous but clearly my opinion is not the one that matters once we reach this level). And if Vivian is going to come back claiming you have been incivil I don't see how it helps to confirm these accusations by acting incivilly. Anyway, it was meant as friendly advice and I hoped it could be taken that way, I hate to see a valid point (yours) drowned out by so much negativity. ]]] 20:29, 13 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == signature == | |||
| I'm not trying to sound obnoxious. I'm just telling you that i've viewed the wikipedia policy, and it does not violate it, other than for people whining about me having a unique signature. Simply because i stand out, i'm being whined at. However, if i MUST have it changed, i'll have a section on my user page for you and your friends to suggest new things. example: is the box surrounding my text alright? or is it the colouring? i'm angry becuase people are telling me to change my signature, and not saying what is wrong, or on what to change it to. if there are those that can't read it, that's fine. I'll change to support them, but i think this is just ]ing going too far. i prefer individuality. ] 22:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Reply == | |||
| Never mind. ] (]) 13:02, 16 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you == | |||
| Even though I'm still trying to get the ] episode pages back, I want to say thank you because you seem to be the only person trying to find solutions that everyone will like. You're the only person who's against having article pages who seems to have a soul. I mean, ] honestly? So I just want to thank you for being a real, decent, and smart person. {{Unsigned|Laynethebangs}} (08:25, 23 December 2007) | |||
| == an AfD closing statement worth reading == | |||
| see ]. --] 09:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| see also ] and ]. --] 10:52, 24 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Scrubs episode guides== | |||
| While WP policy does say "no plots" and all, IAR does say that if it adds value to WP, ignore all those rules. Clearly, the deletion of plots is not being applied to every article with a plot in it (see Star Wars, most movies, etc). Why are Scrubs episode articles deleted when they had value to so many people? If it's just "It goes against WP Policy" then that goes against WP Policy, taking IAR in to account. The fact remains, there was valuable information on those articles, and now folks don't have that information. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Ye Art Cordially Invited to the Annex == | |||
| Hello, My good Fellow, listen and I shalt telleth Ye a Tale of a Wiki that well comes All Manner of Articles relating to Fiction. What is This wonderful Place of Fantasy, You ask? It is the <span class="plainlinks"></span>, Haven to All fiction-related Refugee Articles from Misplaced Pages. | |||
| Before nominating or proposing a fiction-related Article for Deletion, It is My sincerest Hope that Ye import It to the Annex. Why do This, You wonder? Individuals have dedicated an enormous Amount of Time to writing These Articles, and ’twould be a Pity for the Information to Vanish unto the Oblivion where only Administrators could see Them. | |||
| Here is a Step-by-Step Process of how to Bringeth Articles into the Annex: | |||
| #Ye shall need at least three Browser Tabs or Windows open. For the first Tab or Window, go to ]. For the second, go <span class="plainlinks"></span>. (If Ye have not an Account at Wikia, then create One.) Do whatever Ye want for the third. | |||
| #Next, open the Program known as ]. If Ye haveth It not, then open ]. Go to “Save as,” and for “Encoding,” select either “Unicode” or “UTF-8.” For “Save as type,” select “All Files.” For “File name,” input “<code>export.xml</code>” and save It. Leave the Window open. | |||
| #Next, go to the ] Window at Misplaced Pages, and un-check the two small Boxes near the “Export” Button. Input the Name of the Misplaced Pages Article which Ye wish to import to the Annex into the large Field, and click “Export.” | |||
| #Right-click on the Page full of Code which appears, and clicketh on “View Source” or “View Page Source” or any Option with similar Wording. A new Notepad Window called “index” or Something similar should appear. Press Ctrl+A to highlight All the Text then Ctrl+C to copy It. Close yon “index” Window, and go to the Notepad “export.xml” Window. Press Ctrl+V to pasteth the Text There, and then save It by pressing Ctrl+S. | |||
| #Now go to the <span class="plainlinks"></span> Window over at the Annex. Clicketh on “Browse…” and select the “export.xml” File. At last, click on “Upload file,” and Thou art done, My Friend! However, if It says 100 Revisions be imported, Ye be not quite finished just yet. Go back to Misplaced Pages’s ], and leave only the “Include only the current revision, not the full history” Box checked. Export That, copy the Page Source, close the “index” Window, and go to the “export.xml” Window. Press Ctrl+A to highlight the Code all ready There, press “backspace” to erase It, and press Ctrl+V to pasteth the new Code There. Press Ctrl+S to save It, then upload once more to the Annex. Paste <code><nowiki>{{Misplaced Pages|{{PAGENAME}}}}</nowiki></code> at the Bottom of the imported Article at the Annex, and Ye art now finally done! Keepeth the “export.xml” File for future Use. | |||
| Thank Ye for using the Annex, My Friend, — ] 05:09, 29 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Request== | |||
| If you get a chance, can you run through ]? He is one of those fun wikilawyers that only like to deal with a few articles at a time. ] (]) 19:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :However blunt force reverting without a reason is not a very good resonce.] (]) 19:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Restoring articles that violate our guidelines and policies is disruptive; that is resonce enough. ] (]) 19:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks for the help. ] (]) 02:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| whatever then, why was that message that you posted on my page in German?. ] (]) 19:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Ok then, sorry if I caused you any problems. :) ] (]) 19:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Montreal== | |||
| ] | |||
| By the way, Montreal is one of my favorite cities to have ever visited! Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 20:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Swamp Skiin' Throwdown|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 23:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :It popped up on ] so I warned both sides. Hopefully it doesn't need to be protected. Could it not be discussed somewhere? Regards. ] (]) 00:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::(X-posted) No need to protect. there are another half dozen editors who will revert should I fall foul of 3RR on that page. Thanks for being diligent! ] (]) 07:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == VivianDarkbloom == | |||
| You described her as a "self-admitted sock". I gather that ] and ] are one and the same. Any other personalities that you are aware of?] (]) 17:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I am pretty sure it's a him actually and I cannot remember which account they were using before, but it was part of the user's whole anti-porn thing (which, ironically, I actually agree with - the bar for notability is ridiculously, absurdly low for that kind of shit, which is what you get I guess when you have a site made up mostly of young single males). I'm sure if you start to dig around old porn actor AfDs, it could be figured out quite quickly. Vivian is a PITA, but he doesn't contribute that much and his reverts to the fiction stuff is only because he has a personal grudge against me,TTN, etc.... Vivian, like my other stalker, the highly disagreeable Alansohn, is certainly committed to the view that I am ruining wikipedia and hence my edits need to be reverted and my votes countered. Muh - maybe they're right. ] (]) 18:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I warn you that WP:NPA applies to user talk pages. ''']''' (]) 20:08, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks for that DGG. I've only been here for about three years, so I am still learning my way around. I appreciate the tip and I see upon review that my comment is just riddled with vicious personal attacks, so I'll have to watch my step. ] (]) 20:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I think you intended to be satyrical, but if you do not realize after three years that "the highly disagreeable X", "a personal grudge against me" are personal attacks, I'm glad i did remind you. ''']''' (]) 05:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Tx DGG - but you are wrong; I intended to be ironic, perhaps satirical. But I am not a ], so satyre is something to which I have yet to aspire. But I do appreciate the heads up. Fine stuff indeed my good man. ] (]) | |||
| == Scrubs characters == | |||
| Are you still working on or have you given up? TTN a merge in August, but there has obviously been little or no improvement. Scrubs is kind of a cool show (although I didn't really watch it beyond Season 2), so it would be sad to see the character articles redirected/deleted in three years just because current fan-editors are unwilling to cooperate in cleaning up the mess. – ] <sup>]•c</sup> 12:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==AfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ]An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:adw --> ] 15:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I have to say that you all should be careful pushing this one. You put it up for AFD, they responded by improving the article. Is it likely to be trouble later? Sure it is. Is it deletable right now? Probably not. You would build more brownie points for good faith by recognizing the improvements and withdrawing the nomination. If it immediately falls to hell, renominate, and you can point at the collapse as justification.] (]) 16:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit warring == | |||
| Please stop edit warring or there is a possibility that you both will be blocked. Discuss changes in a civil manner. Thanks, - ] (]) 22:35, 13 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Request for Arbitration== | |||
| I have filed a request for arbitration which involves you. Please see ]. ] 04:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Opinion == | |||
| Seeing as you were involved in both the merge discussion and what happened last night ''against'' episode articles... ? ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 19:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Centralized TV Episode Discussion == | |||
| Over the past months, TV episodes have been reverted by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here . --] (]) 18:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Figures? == | |||
| You hate fancruft with a deep and burning passion. <!-- Not an accusation, just an awesome phrase. -->That was clear from the where you urged us to destroy such content to rescue Misplaced Pages's reputation. Fair enough. | |||
| You may have noticed that I've been trying - insofar as I've been able to work here - to burrow into the underlying issues. The way I see it, there's a lot of headbutting and people slapping each other with acronyms going on, but we have no clear idea of what we're doing and why, and no real vocabulary for discussing that. Misplaced Pages's reputation is one of the several issues involved. As such, could you tell me how you came to that conclusion and of the sources you have for supporting it? Data on what Misplaced Pages's reputation is like and how that's been found out would also be helpful, as would discussion on how such a campaign would affect our reputation, and on the grounds it takes for mass deletion of content based on external pressure to be justified. Thanks, ]<font color="black">]</font><font color="green">]</font> 03:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located ]. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, ]. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ]. | |||
| On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ] (]) 21:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==I would like to make a proposition== | |||
| Hello. I understand that you are TTN's accomplice in the edits to Misplaced Pages, correct. I would like to reach a comprimise then. I already talked with TTN about the Fatal Fury and Street Fighter character articles. I have already redirected some non-notable crap to the main game page, so if you have the time, then perhaps you can help me to decide which articles sould or should not be merged or deleted. Thank you, friend. ] (]) 09:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| I have blocked you for 24 hours for your disruptive mass-reverts lacking an explanation. Please do not do so in the future, as the episode pages are controversial enough as it is. <font color="DarkGreen">]</font><sup>]</sup> 14:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|I see I have been blocked, but the reason seems peremptory. Ample discussion has taken place on the talk page of the ] LOE page in question (to the issue of explanation), so that reasoning strikes me as off-base. Whilst the redirects are perhaps controversial (although there is plenty of consensus for them and they are fully backed up by our policies as has been discussed ''at length'') I think procedurally a sternly worded, stentorian warning would have been in order prior to the issue of an outright block. I note further that there is no consensus that we stop applying our policies and guidelines during the course of arbcom, which after all is not in a position to rule on content issues, so this actions seems capricious. I therefore request this block be removed. ] (]) 22:52, 30 January 2008 (UTC)|decline=''I think procedurally a sternly worded, stentorian warning would have been in order prior to the issue of an outright block.'' Misplaced Pages is not a bureacracy, it is obvious from the arbcom that this is controversial, and you show no remorse for your actions, or an indication that you would stop. ] (]) 22:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)}} | |||
| : There appears to have been discussion for around two months, initiated by Eusebeus at the top of the talk page. A number of users on the List of Scrubs episodes talk page agreed with Will/Sceptre's statement "Keep the ones in the navbox as sufficiently notable (award winning, etc). Redirect the less for lack of real world context." Other users suggested season redirects. I also note Cowman has stated "I'll have no issue if another administrator wishes to unblock him". I think there are several different interpretations, Cowman had one and I had another. Accordingly, I am unblocking. ] 23:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Symphonies by ]== | |||
| ], I am trying to understand your notion of notability. I see from your userpage that you've contributed to a few articles about symphonies by ]. You created the ] article, but it does not contain "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Do you think that symphony is notable? | |||
| The articles ], ], and ] also do not contain "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Do you think those articles should be redirected to ]? Does the ] make each of those symphonies notable enough to have their own article? --] (]) 05:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notification of injunction relating to episodes and characters== | |||
| The ], in ], have voted to implement a ]. It can be viewed on the case page by following ]. The injunction is as follows: | |||
| <blockquote>For the duration of ], no editor shall redirect or delete any currently existing article regarding a television series episode or character; nor un-redirect or un-delete any currently redirected or deleted article on such a topic, nor apply or remove a tag related to notability to such an article. Administrators are authorized to revert such changes on sight, and to block any editors that persist in making them after being warned of this injunction.</blockquote> | |||
| As noted in the text of the injunction, this restriction is in effect until the ] case is officially closed by a clerk, following a successful motion to close by the arbitrators. Please note that, for the purposes of enforcement (c.f. the final line of the text of the injunction), all parties in this case at the time of this message () have been notified of this injunction. | |||
| On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ] (]) 02:19, 3 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == I think you quoted the wrong the policy == | |||
| Actually, that was a carefully thought out and custom written response to Ned's "solution" to the problem. The policy you quoted had something to do with not using a boiler-plate response. Sorry you disagree, friend of Ned, but I made the comment in response to his being lazy and using the Undo button instead of taking note of changes made to the template since mine were applied. --] (]) 20:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh those, does him being "established" make him above the law? I picked two appropriate notices (could've applied more than I did) and followed proper procedure when adding them to his talk page. Simple as that. A parking ticket is "indecorous", but it's there to remind people that they shouldn't park their cars in certain places. --] (]) 22:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Nav template stuff == | |||
| Aeron has now started an ] thread about me reverting his style removals at ]. If you'd like to leave any comments regarding the situation please do. If not, no worries. -- ] 08:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Happy Valentine's Day! == | |||
| ] has wished you a happy Valentine's day, and good luck in love and friendship!]] | |||
| A short/sweet little message, which I hope has made your day better! Happy Valentine's Day!!! ] (]) 02:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Incivility == | |||
| Language like is quite inappropriate for an encyclopedia, and especially at an arbitration case where decorum is at issue. I can tell that you disagreed strongly with the proposal, but saying things like "disgusting, scurrilous and scabrous, even judged by the abominably low standards induced by the bleating querulousness & rampant fractiousness of ]", and calling it "gutter slandermongering" is not an acceptable response. You can disagree without over-the-top attacks on character. ]·] 21:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:18, 2 May 2024
| Please leave a new message. |
 Archives |
January 2023
Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you copied or moved text from Jean Jullien into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Misplaced Pages's content, here or elsewhere, Misplaced Pages's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Misplaced Pages, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 14:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Christian Friedrich Michaelis (philosopher)
The article Christian Friedrich Michaelis (philosopher) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced with unclear claim to notability.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,