Revision as of 00:28, 25 February 2008 editUmrguy42 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,685 edits explanation of reversion← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:29, 29 January 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Replaced obsolete font tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(81 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{unblock reviewed|1= This was the only account I had and I'm not a sockpuppet. I was falsely accused.|decline=In view of your previous disruption, a mere protestation of innocence is not enough to call this block into doubt. Convince us. See ]. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 17:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
==Your recent edits== | |||
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> --] (]) 19:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
{{unblock reviewed|1= I'm innocent. I contacted a user by the name of Canadian Paul to ask him how he got his userbox on his talk page. I first noticed his page after witnessing vandalism by a user on ] or another article on details about ], but after asking CP, then he put me in a sockpuppet case. I did nothing wrong in my opinion.|decline=At the very least, you were edit warring; this is a blockable offense in itself. Beside that, you were being disruptive elsewhere. Your actions do seem to relate to those of another user, and this block seems valid. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 02:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
Thanks for the advice I didn't know how that was done.(] (]) 20:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)) | |||
==Wiki Boxing Project - input needed== | |||
:We don't need a race-by-race update. It makes the article too long and hard to read. --] (]) 00:18, 25 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
There is a discussing relating to the use of boxer's nickname/s in the infobox. Please could you give your opinion ]. Thanks.--] (]) 15:19, 16 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Hey, thought I'd put in an explanation for my recent reversion of your addition to Dale Jr.'s page (the "one-click" reversion didn't give me the chance to update the reason) - as the user above stated, 1. we don't really need race-by-race updates, and 2. more importantly, I would recommend holding off on calling a racer "out of it" until we see the final result of the race. In addition, you might want to consider the overall impact of certain races on the entire season - given the number of wrecks and DNFs, I would suggest waiting to see the overall picture - i.e., instead of listing every wreck, IF NEEDED, it might go (at the end of the season) towards a statement on the order of "Wrecks at {Race 1}, {Race 2}, {Race 3}, ... contributed to Jr. not making the Chase"... Anyway, hope these suggestions help you with your edits in the future. --] (]) 00:28, 25 February 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 09:29, 29 January 2022
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Gordon24fan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This was the only account I had and I'm not a sockpuppet. I was falsely accused.
Decline reason:
In view of your previous disruption, a mere protestation of innocence is not enough to call this block into doubt. Convince us. See WP:GAB. Sandstein 17:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Gordon24fan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm innocent. I contacted a user by the name of Canadian Paul to ask him how he got his userbox on his talk page. I first noticed his page after witnessing vandalism by a user on Anne Frank or another article on details about World War II, but after asking CP, then he put me in a sockpuppet case. I did nothing wrong in my opinion.
Decline reason:
At the very least, you were edit warring; this is a blockable offense in itself. Beside that, you were being disruptive elsewhere. Your actions do seem to relate to those of another user, and this block seems valid. Hersfold 02:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Wiki Boxing Project - input needed
There is a discussing relating to the use of boxer's nickname/s in the infobox. Please could you give your opinion here. Thanks.--Vintagekits (talk) 15:19, 16 October 2009 (UTC)