Misplaced Pages

User talk:Sharavanabhava: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:09, 28 February 2008 editAnthon01 (talk | contribs)4,204 edits Help w dilutions← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:29, 14 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,239 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <center> (1x)Tag: Fixed lint errors 
(311 intermediate revisions by 45 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Notice|If you leave a comment for me here, I will respond ''here'' and will let you know on your talk page using the {{tl|Talkback}} template. If I have left a comment for you on your talk page, expect that I will be watching ''your'' page and you should reply there (if you wish) rather than here. This way, conversations are kept in their proper context. However, if your talk page policy is different than mine, I may follow your preferred style of conversation. I reserve the right to delete or archive (but will not otherwise modify) any comments left here.}} {{Notice|If you leave a comment for me here, I will respond ''here'' and will let you know on your talk page using the {{tl|Talkback}} template unless you are likely to be watching this page. If I have left a comment for you on your talk page, expect that I will be watching ''your'' page and you should reply there (if you wish) rather than here. This way, conversations are kept in their proper context. However, if your talk page policy is different than mine, I may follow your preferred style of conversation. I reserve the right to delete or archive (but will not otherwise modify) any comments left here.}}
<center>''''''</center> <div class="center">''''''</div>
{{archive box|]. ].}} {{archive box|]. ].}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
Line 6: Line 6:
|counter = 2 |counter = 2
|algo = old(14d) |algo = old(14d)
|archive = User talk:Whig/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:Sharavanabhava/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
== Top heading ==
For some reason, the automatic archiver may not want to archive this section. &mdash;] (''']''') 07:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


== ] ==
== Chris Bennet ==


Hi,<br>
I checked out that article a bit. I've read a lot like it and I have a copy of the green gold book.
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=693174033 -->


== ]: Voting now open! ==
I actually started to call Chris to use as a reference but he's super busy and in all honesty, he's kind of a prick if you ask him to do something on the fly from what I've heard. (Understandable) I don't even know for sure that he is aware of the kabbalistic link, but I do believe he would put his name on the fact that tiferet's paths do look like a cananbis leaf if he was made aware. I am taking a bit of flack for not having a Chris Bennet-like name to back up my image's utility. I will probably call him when I get the time.


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Sharavanabhava. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
Feel free to let me know if you have any other comments or suggestions. =)
--] (]) 22:54, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thanks for the comment. You have irc? Maybe even email -Much better mode of communication for telling me to stfu. =)
Much love bro --] (]) 08:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Actually, no, feel free to express stfu'ness on wikipedia. That's why this is such a great resource, constructive criticism. Thanks again / God Bless--] (]) 08:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/3&oldid=750539315 -->


== ]: Voting now open! ==


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Sharavanabhava. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
Update 2/13:
I wrote a little summary of my wikiexperience for one of the admins. If you get a chance, check it out and tell me if you think I'm addressing the situation properly at this point: http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:B#Godislove.png


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
My first few moves on wikipedia weren't the biggest crowd pleasers, but I think everything has been correctd perfectly. =)
--] (]) 18:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
:Well, there's a learning curve to everything. :) &mdash;] (''']''') 18:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/3&oldid=750539315 -->


== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
== Question ==


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Sharavanabhava. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
Could you clarify what your post on VU talk page means? ] (]) 02:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
:For what it is worth, I would prefer that the matter be dropped at this point, per my comments on that page. Regards, ] (]) 02:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
::Will do. &mdash;] (''']''') 05:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.


If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/08&oldid=813407029 -->


== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==
== Spicuzza article ==


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Sharavanabhava. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
Thanks for the comment. What did she talk to you about then? ] (]) 06:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== Answer ==


If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, but I didn't get around to answering your question amidst all the inappropriate discussion and cross-commenting going on. That's the problem with disruptive editing. I'll try to get back to your question when I get a chance. --] (]) 17:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
:Do you think that comments like this are appropriate ? I do not. --] (]) 17:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/10&oldid=866998363 -->
::Yes, I think that comment was appropriate. You still have not gotten around to answering my question, and I'm not interested in going round in circles again. &mdash;] (''']''') 18:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
:::You've not answered mine either. Should I accuse the same of you then? --] (]) 18:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
::::This is disruptive. I believe it is time for an RfC. &mdash;] (''']''') 18:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
:::::Yes, it is disruptive. I'm asking for people to follow WP:TALK, and instead I get disruption. --] (]) 18:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm not agreeing to disagree. If someone cannot follow WP:TALK, disruption results. I'm agreeing that there's disruption. I'm saying it is being caused by multiple editors, including yourself, who are repeatedly violating WP:TALK. --] (]) 01:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

== John Roberts's education ==

Please provide a citation showing that Chief Justice John Roberts ever attended Sacred Heart. I am reasonably sure that he matriculated to Harvard after high school.
:I have tagged it for citation. When you find facts in the encyclopedia you think may be wrong, placing a {{tl|fact}} tag lets other editors know that a citation is necessary. This is preferable to deleting, unless the unverified fact is harmful. &mdash;] (''']''') 10:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Sure thing. Sorry about that. I usually don't edit, but from now on, if I see something that's suspect, I'll do that. Take care.

==Thanks==
I actually have posted on WT:NPOV and RS/N and while the large majority of editors agreed with my understanding of NPOV, the pseudosacience crowd have persisted in pushing their version of NPOV and RS. Filll is always claiming he knows NPOV but I suspect his view is somewhat distorted.] (]) 13:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

I have added ] for discussion. ] (]) 14:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

I didn't assume bad faith. I think Filll was being sincere. I just laughed when I saw the 98% comment, especially in light of he fact that he was lecturing me on NPOV. ] (]) 19:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

:I've had discussions with Filll about NPOV and I find his interpretations quite novel. However, we have had them and do not need to rehash them on WT:NPOV more than needed to allow neutral editors to comment. &mdash;] (''']''') 20:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

== Bénard cells ==

Until I found your mention of ] on ], I never knew that this phenomenon has a name. Thank you. - ] ~(])]~ 22:14, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

==Accusations have been made...==
Whig, I have asked you directly several times, particularly in the aftermath of your complaining about allegedly "uncivil" behaviour on my part whether you had instituted any action against user DanaUllman for effectively accusing me of lying about whether I was in possession of a journal article that was the subject of discussion. I would be grateful for an answer and you have not placed one on my Talk page whether the question was posed to you.] (]) 07:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
:How would I institute an action? &mdash;] (''']''') 08:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
::I don't know. You're the expert. You did do this but I didn't notice you citing any of DU's actions as part of that, though did say this of me "OffTheFence edits only one article and never provides any verifiable, reliable sources for anything he writes, nor will he agree to follow WP:DR". I don't see any criticisms placed on DU's Talk page equivalent to the ones you have made on mine. I would have thought that accusing another editor of lying was a fairly important breach of civility. Perhaps you think otherwise. ] (]) 12:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
:::I never observed DanaUllman to lie. If you'd like to post something yourself, you can do so without my help. &mdash;] (''']''') 16:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
::::Huh? I think you have seriously dropped the plot here. It is DU that accused me of lying and which you seem to have no problem with. He said "please do not allege that my quotes above are not "verifiable" just because you personally do not seem to have a copy of the article." I'm not offended, just observing the behaviour pattern. ] (]) 23:30, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
:::::I see nothing wrong with the quote you supplied. If you have a complaint, perhaps someone else might be interested. &mdash;] (''']''') 02:03, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

==Help w dilutions==
Help with this,if you can. ] (]) 22:01, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

:: You know Filll better than I. What is he talking about? ] (]) 07:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

::: I wouldn't want to psychoanalyze. &mdash;] (''']''') 07:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

:::: Well I thought you might understand or have some inkling of his concern. ] (]) 08:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
::::: I think he is unwilling to admit error, because then he might be confronted with more errors. &mdash;] (''']''') 08:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Since you are both correct and you are sure you are correct, why not go ahead on that basis?--] (]) 08:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

:I am simply asking you to acknowledge your misstatement. &mdash;] (''']''') 08:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I am not allowed to disagree with you since that is uncivil. So you can assume you are correct and act accordingly.--] (]) 08:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

:It is possible to disagree civilly. &mdash;] (''']''') 08:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Do whatever you want. --] (]) 08:33, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

:Fine, okay. Please stop commenting here, in that case. We have nothing further to discuss. &mdash;] (''']''') 08:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm going to try to move the topic back and get it back on topic. I suggested that if Filll wants to continue discussing why things are so dangerous, then he do so on user talk pages and not in the NPOV page. I will not engage him there. ] (]) 13:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:29, 14 March 2023

If you leave a comment for me here, I will respond here and will let you know on your talk page using the {{Talkback}} template unless you are likely to be watching this page. If I have left a comment for you on your talk page, expect that I will be watching your page and you should reply there (if you wish) rather than here. This way, conversations are kept in their proper context. However, if your talk page policy is different than mine, I may follow your preferred style of conversation. I reserve the right to delete or archive (but will not otherwise modify) any comments left here.
Please click here to leave me a new comment.

Archives

Archive 1. Archive 2.



This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sharavanabhava. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sharavanabhava. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sharavanabhava. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sharavanabhava. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)