| Revision as of 23:22, 28 February 2008 editGordon24fan (talk | contribs)370 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:29, 29 January 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Replaced obsolete font tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (75 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|1= This was the only account I had and I'm not a sockpuppet. I was falsely accused.|decline=In view of your previous disruption, a mere protestation of innocence is not enough to call this block into doubt. Convince us. See ]. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 17:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
| ==Your recent edits== | |||
| Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> --] (]) 19:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1= I'm innocent. I contacted a user by the name of Canadian Paul to ask him how he got his userbox on his talk page. I first noticed his page after witnessing vandalism by a user on ] or another article on details about ], but after asking CP, then he put me in a sockpuppet case. I did nothing wrong in my opinion.|decline=At the very least, you were edit warring; this is a blockable offense in itself. Beside that, you were being disruptive elsewhere. Your actions do seem to relate to those of another user, and this block seems valid. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 02:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
| Thanks for the advice I didn't know how that was done.(] (]) 20:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)) | |||
| ==Wiki Boxing Project - input needed== | |||
| There is a discussing relating to the use of boxer's nickname/s in the infobox. Please could you give your opinion ]. Thanks.--] (]) 15:19, 16 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:29, 29 January 2022
Gordon24fan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This was the only account I had and I'm not a sockpuppet. I was falsely accused.
Decline reason:
In view of your previous disruption, a mere protestation of innocence is not enough to call this block into doubt. Convince us. See WP:GAB. Sandstein 17:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gordon24fan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm innocent. I contacted a user by the name of Canadian Paul to ask him how he got his userbox on his talk page. I first noticed his page after witnessing vandalism by a user on Anne Frank or another article on details about World War II, but after asking CP, then he put me in a sockpuppet case. I did nothing wrong in my opinion.
Decline reason:
At the very least, you were edit warring; this is a blockable offense in itself. Beside that, you were being disruptive elsewhere. Your actions do seem to relate to those of another user, and this block seems valid. Hersfold 02:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Wiki Boxing Project - input needed
There is a discussing relating to the use of boxer's nickname/s in the infobox. Please could you give your opinion here. Thanks.--Vintagekits (talk) 15:19, 16 October 2009 (UTC)