Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Gelf Darkhearth: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:27, 1 March 2008 editShadzar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,137 edits →Gelf Darkhearth← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:45, 6 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(17 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''Delete''' --] 00:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|F}}


:{{la|Gelf Darkhearth}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Gelf Darkhearth}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Non notable ''Dungeons & Dragons'' deity, appearing briefly in a single supplement. As far as I know, and as far as the article states, mentioned no where else. No evidence of third party coverage. ] (]) 18:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC) Non notable ''Dungeons & Dragons'' deity, appearing briefly in a single supplement. As far as I know, and as far as the article states, mentioned no where else. No evidence of third party coverage. ] (]) 18:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
*'''Make like ] did to ] and Delete'''. Obscurity does not an article make. -'']'' <sup>(<font color="0000FF">] ]</font>)</sup> 18:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC) *'''Make like ] did to ] and Delete'''. Obscurity does not an article make. -'']'' <sup>(] ])</sup> 18:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - non notable, so much so it took 24 (1980-2004) years before he was introduced as the brother of Garl Glittergold? serious retcon here. ]|]|] 19:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - non notable, so much so it took 24 (1980-2004) years before he was introduced as the brother of Garl Glittergold? serious retcon here. ]|]|] 19:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

'''Delete''' Fails ]. ] (]) 19:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

'''Delete''' Non-notable. March is D&D Spring Cleaning Month; you can help. Cheers, ] 08:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>--] (]) 10:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' No secondary sources, no assertion of notability. Fails ] and ]. ] (]) 10:41, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
'''Keep''' Notable fictional deity passes ]. Consistent with a ] on . Sincerely, --<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;">]</span><sup>'']''</sup> 16:16, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

'''Delete''' Unnotable fictional character which fails ]. Inconsistent with an encyclopaedia and belongs instead on a specialised fan wikia. ] (]) 17:45, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
:Not currently; I have seen material from the D&D Wiki and can confirm that it allows homebrewed material. -'']'' <sup>(] ])</sup> 18:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Character first appeared in a D&D supplement, and is not part of any "core" pantheon which recurs in novels or throughout several products. ] ] 10:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small><small>—] (]) 23:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)</small>


:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 21:45, 6 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Gelf Darkhearth

Gelf Darkhearth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable Dungeons & Dragons deity, appearing briefly in a single supplement. As far as I know, and as far as the article states, mentioned no where else. No evidence of third party coverage. J Milburn (talk) 18:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:N. ArcAngel (talk) 19:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete Non-notable. March is D&D Spring Cleaning Month; you can help. Cheers, Jack Merridew 08:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Keep Notable fictional deity passes WP:N. Consistent with a specizalized encyclopedia on Dungeons & Dragons deities. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 16:16, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete Unnotable fictional character which fails WP:N. Inconsistent with an encyclopaedia and belongs instead on a specialised fan wikia. Eusebeus (talk) 17:45, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Not currently; I have seen material from the D&D Wiki and can confirm that it allows homebrewed material. -Jéské 18:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.