Misplaced Pages

Jakub Świnka: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:29, 25 July 2005 editGentgeen (talk | contribs)Administrators24,097 edits recat← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:31, 24 July 2024 edit undoSmasongarrison (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers723,166 edits Moving from Category:13th-century Polish clergy to Category:13th-century Polish Roman Catholic priests Diffusing per WP:DIFFUSE and/or WP:ALLINCLUDED using Cat-a-lot 
(67 intermediate revisions by 54 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|13th / 14th century Polish Catholic archbishop}}
'''Jakub Świnka''' (died on ], ]) was a ] Catholic priest, the Archbishop of ] and a notable politician and supporter of the idea of unification of all Polish lands under the rule of ]. His Coat of Arms was ].
{{Infobox Christian leader
| type = Archbishop
| honorific-prefix = His Excellency
| title = ]
| name = Jakub Świnka
| image = Jakub Świnka.PNG
| image_size =
| caption =
| birth_date = unknown
| birth_place =
| death_date = 4 March 1314
| death_place =
| church = ]
| archdiocese = ]
| province =
| metropolis =
| diocese =
| see =
| enthroned = 1283
| ended = 1314
| ordination =
| consecration =
| cardinal =
| rank =
| other_post =
| coat_of_arms = POL COA Świnka.svg
| coat_of_arms_alt = Coat of arms of Archbishop Jakub Swinka
| motto =
| shrine =
| suppressed_date = <!-- -------- Other -------- -->
| other =
| ordained_by =
| consecrated_by =
| predecessor = ]
| successor = ]
}}
'''Jakub Świnka''' (died 4 March 1314) was a Polish Catholic priest, the ] and a notable politician and statesman, supporter of the idea of unification of all Polish lands under the rule of ] ("the Short"). His coat of arms was ].


==Biography== ==Life==
Little is known about the early life of Jakub Świnka, nor are his parents known. It is thought he came from a pagan family and his grandmother was a herbalist, which inevitably at that time included elements of paganism.<ref>Płomienna korona</ref> Świnka was a descendant of a noble family from ] or ] coat of arms Świnka. His family started a career in Greater Poland, but with limited success. It is known that his elder brother Sułek did not hold any official posts while his uncle Jan Świnka was mentioned in 1286 as the ] of a town of ].


Jakub Świnka probably joined the Catholic priesthood and it is also probable that he graduated from a law school – probably in ] or ]. In the 1270s he was promoted to the post of a ] of the ] in ]. For his service to the ], most notably to ] and to ] he was awarded, on 8 January 1294, with the village of Polanowo.
Little is known about the early life of Jakub &#346;winka, nor are his parents known. It is probable that &#346;winka was a descendant of a peasant family from ] or ]. His family started a career in Greater Poland, but with a limited success. It is known that his elder brother Su&#322;ek did not hold any official posts while his uncle Jan &#346;winka was mentioned in ] as the ] of a tiny town of ].


Świnka was consecrated as archbishop in ] on 30 July 1283 and the results of the voting were accepted by Pope ] on 19 December the same year. The election of a Polish archbishop was seen by the rulers of Greater Poland as a chance to break the links with the ], and on 1 August 1284 Duke Przemysł II granted the bishops of Gniezno with a privilege to mint their own coins. This strengthened their power significantly.
Jakub &#346;winka must have joined the Catholic Church and it is also probable that he graduated from a law school (probably in Cracow or Prague). In 1270's he was promoted to the post of a ] of the chapter in ]. For his service to the ], most notably to ] and to ] he was awarded on ], ], with the village of Polanowo.


From the earliest days of his reign, Świnka faced a strong opposition to his rule. The most important issues were the problem of the ] of ] (to which belonged both the cities of ] and ]) that was claimed both by the Polish bishop of Gniezno and the German ], and the struggle for dominance over the Catholics in Poland between Polish and German hierarchs. The latter problem was seen as the most important, since several monasteries in ] decided to break the links with its Polish-Bohemian province and apply for membership in the ] branch of the ] order.
In early ] the German archbishop of Gniezno ] abdicated and soon afterwards &#346;winka was chosen by the chapter as his successor. However, due to strong opposition to his rule it was not until 12 years afterwards when he was officially named the archbishop. &#346;winka was consecrated in ] on ], ] and the results of the voting were accepted by Pope ] on ] of the same year. The election of a Polish archbishop was seen by the rulers of Greater Poland as a chance to break the links with the ] and on ], ], ] granted the bishops of Gniezno with a privilege to mint their own coins. This strengthened their power significantly.


To counter the expansion of ], Świnka organized a ] that took place on 6 January 1285 in ]. During the meeting, he ordered all priests that were subject to his bishopric to give their ]s in ] rather than German. To further unify the church in Poland he also organized a series of synods held every couple of years, which served as a means to control the changes within the church. The synods were:
From the earliest days of his reign, &#346;winka faced a strong opposition to his rule. The most important issues were the problem of the ] of ] (to which belonged both the cities of ] and ]) that was claimed both by the Polish bishop of ] and the German bishops of ], and the struggle for dominance over the catholics in Poland between Polish and German hierarchs. The latter problem was seen as the most important, since several monasteries in ] decided to break the links with its Polish-Bohemian province and apply for membership in the ] branch of the ] order.
# ], 6 January 1285
# Łęczyca, 26 October 1287
# ], 14 October 1290
# Gniezno, April 1298
# unknown place, May 1306
# Gniezno, May 1309


As a politician, Jakub Świnka was a strong supporter of the idea of re-unification of ], divided onto separate duchies after the death of ]. To unify the Polish lands culturally and oppose the aggressive German culture, he strongly promoted the cult of St. ], one of the ]s of Poland. To further his cause, he tried to diminish the tensions between the dukes of various parts of Poland and the Catholic bishops. This was the case with ] ] and the ] ], whom Świnka wanted to reconcile.
To counter the expansion of ], &#346;winka organised a ] that took place on ], ], in ]. During the meeting, he ordered all priests that were subject to his bishopry to give their ]s in ] rather than German. To further unify the church in Poland he also organised a series of synods held every couple of years, which served as a means to control the changes within the church. The synods were:
# ], ], ]
# &#321;&#281;czyca, ], ]
# ], ], ]
# Gniezno, April ]
# unknown place, May ]
# Gniezno, May ]


As a politician, Jakub &#346;winka was a strong supporter of the idea of re-unification of ], divided onto separate duchies after the death of ]. To unify the Polish lands culturally and oppose the aggressive German culture, he strongly promoted the cult of ], the first Polish catholic saint and one of the ]s of Poland. To further his cause, he tried to diminish the tensions between the dukes of various parts of Poland and the catholic bishops. This was the case with bishop of ] ] and the ] ], whom &#346;winka wanted to re conciliate. Jakub Świnka was also a strong supporter of ] Przemysł II. Until recently it was believed that Świnka was the main architect of an alliance signed in 1287 by the most notable dukes of Poland of the ] dynasty, among them Henry IV the Righteous, ], Przemysł II and ]. However, recent studies show that the ongoing conflicts between the dukes of various parts of divided Poland make the existence of such an alliance highly unlikely.


However, after the congress of ], held in January 1293, such an alliance between Przemysł II, ] and his brother ] was indeed concluded. The three dukes agreed to support each other in the effort of retaking the lands of ] conquered by ]. Świnka was to become a full member of the alliance, probably responsible for propaganda and gathering support of the Pope and the Catholic Church. On 12 January he was also promised a huge reward if Kraków is taken: 300 golden coins a year from the ] and additional 100 golden coins a year for three years after the victory.
Jakub &#346;winka was also a strong supporter of ] ]. Until recently it was believed that &#346;winka was the main architect of an alliance signed in ] by the most notable dukes of Poland of the ] dynasty, among them ], ], Przemys&#322; II and ]. However, recent studies show that the ongoing conflicts between the dukes of various parts of divided Poland make the existence of such an alliance highly unlikely.


On 26 July 1295 Jakub Świnka concluded his first major political victory: despite lack of papal acceptance, he crowned Przemysł II the ] in the ]. Although the ruler controlled only a small part of the Polish domain, he was given a powerful weapon against the Bohemian rulers who also had claims to the Polish throne. Because of great authority of the bishop, the act of coronation was not questioned by any European ruler of the epoch. However, the reign of Przemysł II lasted only 7 months: on 8 February 1296 he was murdered in ] by the ]ians. Following the treaty Kalisz, Świnka backed up Wladislaus the Short, whom he considered the strongest of the candidates to the throne of Greater Poland and ], and possibly the only ruler who could reunite Poland and liberate it of ] influence.
However, after the congress of ], held in January ], such an alliance between Przemys&#322; II, ] and his brother ] was indeed concluded. The three dukes agreed to support each other in the effort of retaking the lands of ] conquered by ] of ]. &#346;winka was to become a full member of the alliance, probably responsible for propaganda and gathering support of the Pope and the catholic church. On ] he was also promised a huge reward if ] is taken: 300 golden coins a year from the salt mines of ] and additional 100 golden coins a year for three years after the victory.


Wladislaus assumed the power in Greater Poland and Pomerania, and added those lands to his tiny domain of ]. However, the struggle against other pretenders (Henry III of Głogów and Wenceslaus II of Bohemia) weakened his rule and finally led to a conflict with the Catholic hierarchy. Świnka broke the pacts he had with Wladislaus, and on 25 July 1300 crowned Wenceslaus II as the King of Poland. It is probable that he lost his belief in weak Wladislaus and saw the new king as the Slavic ruler who could be able to group all Polish lands in one hand. However, the new ruler adopted a pro-German position and started promoting ] ]ns over Polish-speaking priests and politicians. Since 1304 king Wenceslaus also supported ], Kraków bishop of German-Silesian origin, in his struggle for separation of the ] from the bishopric of Gniezno, which only embittered the conflict. This led to yet another vote, after which Świnka resumed good relation with dukes of Cuyavia, relatives of defeated Wladislaus.
On ], ], Jakub &#346;winka concluded his first major political victory: despite lack of papal acceptance, he crowned ] the ] in the cathedral of Gniezno. Although the ruler controlled only a small part of the Polish domain, he was given a powerful weapon against the Bohemian rulers who also had claims to the Polish throne. Because of great authority of the bishop, the act of coronation was not questioned by any European ruler of the epoch. However, the reign of Przemys&#322; II lasted only 7 months: on ], ], he was murdered in ] by the ]ians. Following the treaty Kalisz, &#346;winka backed up ], whom he considered the strongest of the candidates to the throne of Greater Poland and ], and possibly the only ruler who could reunite Poland and liberate it of Bohemian influence.


After the sudden death of Wenceslaus II on 21 June 1305, Świnka yet again supported Wladislaus. It is not known how he reacted to assassination of Wenceslaus' son, ] less than a year later. After a short fight, Wladislaus recaptured all his lands in Cuyavia, and then conquered Lesser Poland and ]. Greater Poland, to which the city of Gniezno belongs, was conquered by Henry III of Głogów and Jakub Świnka moved to ] and ], cities controlled by Wladislaus.
Wladislaus assumed the power in Greater Poland and Pomerania, and added those lands to his tiny domain of ]. However, the struggle against other pretenders (] and ]) weakened his rule and finally led to a conflict with the Catholic hierarchy. &#346;winka broke the pacts he had with Wladislaus and on ], ], crowned ] as the ]. It is probable that he lost his belief in weak Wladislaus and saw the new king as the Slavic ruler who could be able to group all Polish lands in one hand. However, the new ruler adopted a pro-German position and started promoting ] ]ns over Polish-speaking priests and politicians. By ] Wenceslas II also backed the German bishop of ] ] in the struggle for separation of the ] of ] from the bishopry of Gniezno, which only embittered the conflict. This led to yet another volte, after which &#346;winka resumed good relation with dukes of Cuyavia, relatives of defeated Wladislaus II.


On 20 March 1306 Świnka restarted the conflict against Jan Muskata. This time the bishop of Kraków was not backed by the rulers of Bohemia who lost all their influence in Poland, while Świnka was strongly endorsed by Wladislaus. This led to Muskata being deprived of his post on 14 June 1308. The archbishop of Gniezno resumed his control over Lesser Poland. However, after 1311 there are no mentions of his political activity. It is probable that he retired due to old age and poor health.
After the sudden death of ] on ], ], &#346;winka yet again supported Wladislaus. It is not known how he reacted to the death of Wenceslas' son, ] less than a year later. After a short fight, Wladislaus recaptured all his lands in Cuyavia, and then conquered ] and ]. ], to which the city of ] belongs, was conquered by ] and Jakub &#346;winka moved to ] and ], cities controlled by Wladislaus.


He died on 4 March 1314 and was buried in ]. It took another six years for his protégé Wladislaus to finally reunite Poland and be crowned as Polish king.
On ], ], &#346;winka restarted the conflict against ]. This time the bishop of Kraków was not backed by the rulers of Bohemia who lost all their influence in Poland, while &#346;winka was strongly supported by Wladislaus. This led to Muskata being deprived of his post on ], ]. The archbishop of Gniezno resumed his control over Lesser Poland. However, after ] there are no mentions of his political activity. It is probable that he retired due to old age and poor health. He died ], ] and was buried in ] in ]. It took his protege, ] another 6 years to reunite Poland and be crowned the ].


== Bibliography == == See also ==
* ]
* ]

== Further reading ==
::<small>'''Detailed biographies bolded'''</small> ::<small>'''Detailed biographies bolded'''</small>


* Abraham W., Studia krytyczne do dziejów średniowiecznych synodów prowincjonalnych Kościoła polskiego, Kraków 1917.
* Baszkiewicz J., Polska czasów Łokietka, Warszawa 1968.
* Baszkiewicz J., Powstanie zjednoczonego państwa polskiego na przełomie XIII i XIV wieku, Warszawa 1954.
* Bieniak J., Wielkopolska, Kujawy, ziemie łęczycka i sieradzka wobec problemu zjednoczenia państwowego w latach 1300–1306, “Roczniki Towarzystwa Naukowego w Toruniu”, R. LXXIV, 1969, z. 2.
* Bieniak J., Zjednoczenie państwa polskiego, Polska dzielnicowa i zjednoczona, pod red. A. Gieysztora, Warszawa 1972.
* Długopolski E., Władysław Łokietek na tle swoich czasów, Wrocław 1951.
* Dowiat J., Historia kościoła katolickiego w Polsce (do połowy XV wieku), Warszawa 1968.
* Dowiat J., Polska państwem średniowiecznej Europy, Warszawa 1968.
* Karasiewicz W., Episkopat, jego działalność, wybitne jednostki, Historia Kościoła w Polsce, pod red. B. Kumora, Z. Obertyńskiego, t. I, cz. 1., Poznań-Warszawa 1974.
* '''Karasiewicz W., Jakób II Świnka, arcybiskup gnieźnieński, Poznań 1948.'''
* Korytkowski J., Arcybiskupi gnieźnieńscy, prymasowie i metropolici polscy od roku 1000 aż do roku 1821, t. I, Poznań 1888.
* Kumor B., Kościół w obronie polskości. Działalność metropolity Jakuba Świnki, Historia Kościoła w Polsce, pod red. B. Kumora, Z. Obertyńskiego, t. I, cz. 1., Poznań-Warszawa 1974.
* Morawski M., Synod prowincjonalny prowincji gnieźnieńskiej w dawnej Polsce, Włocławek 1935.
* Nitecki P., Biskupi Kościoła w Polsce. Słownik biograficzny, Warszawa 1992.
* Pietras T., "Krwawy wilk z pastorałem". Biskup krakowski Jan zwany Muskatą, Warszawa 2001.
* '''Silnicki T., Gołąb K., Arcybiskup Jakub Świnka i jego epoka, Warszawa 1956.'''
* Subera I., Synody prowincjonalne arcybiskupów gnieźnieńskich, Warszawa 1971.
* Szostkiewicz Z., Katalog biskupów obrządku łacińskiego przedrozbiorowej Polski, „Sacrum Polaniae Millennium”, t. I, 1954. 1925, nr 7–12.
* Tymieniecki K., Jakub Świnka, PSB, t. X, Wrocław-Warszawa-Kraków 1962–1964.
* Zachorowski S., Wiek XIII i panowanie Władysława Łokietka, Grodecki R., Zachorowski S., Dąbrowski J., Dzieje Polski Średniowiecznej, t. I, Kraków 1926.


==References==
* Abraham W., Studia krytyczne do dziejów &#347;redniowiecznych synodów prowincjonalnych Ko&#347;cio&#322;a polskiego, Kraków 1917.
{{Reflist}}
* Baszkiewicz J., Polska czasów &#321;okietka, Warszawa 1968.
* Baszkiewicz J., Powstanie zjednoczonego pa&#324;stwa polskiego na prze&#322;omie XIII i XIV wieku, Warszawa 1954.
* Bieniak J., Wielkopolska, Kujawy, ziemie &#322;&#281;czycka i sieradzka wobec problemu zjednoczenia pa&#324;stwowego w latach 1300-1306, “Roczniki Towarzystwa Naukowego w Toruniu”, R. LXXIV, 1969, z. 2.
* Bieniak J., Zjednoczenie pa&#324;stwa polskiego, Polska dzielnicowa i zjednoczona, pod red. A. Gieysztora, Warszawa 1972.
* D&#322;ugopolski E., W&#322;adys&#322;aw &#321;okietek na tle swoich czasów, Wroc&#322;aw 1951.
* Dowiat J., Historia ko&#347;cio&#322;a katolickiego w Polsce (do po&#322;owy XV wieku), Warszawa 1968.
* Dowiat J., Polska pa&#324;stwem &#347;redniowiecznej Europy, Warszawa 1968.
* Karasiewicz W., Episkopat, jego dzia&#322;alno&#347;&#263;, wybitne jednostki, Historia Ko&#347;cio&#322;a w Polsce, pod red. B. Kumora, Z. Oberty&#324;skiego, t. I, cz. 1., Pozna&#324;-Warszawa 1974.
* '''Karasiewicz W., Jakób II &#346;winka, arcybiskup gnie&#378;nie&#324;ski, Pozna&#324; 1948.'''
* Korytkowski J., Arcybiskupi gnie&#378;nie&#324;scy, prymasowie i metropolici polscy od roku 1000 a&#380; do roku 1821, t. I, Pozna&#324; 1888.
* Kumor B., Ko&#347;ció&#322; w obronie polsko&#347;ci. Dzia&#322;alno&#347;&#263; metropolity Jakuba &#346;winki, Historia Ko&#347;cio&#322;a w Polsce, pod red. B. Kumora, Z. Oberty&#324;skiego, t. I, cz. 1., Pozna&#324;-Warszawa 1974.
* Morawski M., Synod prowincjonalny prowincji gnie&#378;nie&#324;skiej w dawnej Polsce, W&#322;oc&#322;awek 1935.
* Nitecki P., Biskupi Ko&#347;cio&#322;a w Polsce. S&#322;ownik biograficzny, Warszawa 1992.
* Pietras T., "Krwawy wilk z pastora&#322;em". Biskup krakowski Jan zwany Muskat&#261;, Warszawa 2001.
* '''Silnicki T., Go&#322;&#261;b K., Arcybiskup Jakub &#346;winka i jego epoka, Warszawa 1956.'''
* Subera I., Synody prowincjonalne arcybiskupów gnie&#378;nie&#324;skich, Warszawa 1971.
* Szostkiewicz Z., Katalog biskupów obrz&#261;dku &#322;aci&#324;skiego przedrozbiorowej Polski, „Sacrum Polaniae Millennium”, t. I, 1954. 1925, nr 7-12.
* Tymieniecki K., Jakub &#346;winka, PSB, t. X, Wroc&#322;aw-Warszawa-Kraków 1962-1964.
* Zachorowski S., Wiek XIII i panowanie W&#322;adys&#322;awa &#321;okietka, Grodecki R., Zachorowski S., D&#261;browski J., Dzieje Polski &#346;redniowiecznej, t. I, Kraków 1926.

== See also ==
* ]
* ]
* ]


==External links==
{{Archbishop of Gniezno|
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200717104400/http://www.archidiecezja.pl/panorama/katedra360/index.html |date=2020-07-17 }}
Predecessor=]|
{{s-start}}
Successor=]|Dates=1283 &ndash; 1314}}
{{s-rel|ca}}
{{s-bef | before=]}}
{{s-ttl | title=] | years=1283–1314}}
{{s-aft | after=]}}
{{end}}


{{authority control}}
]
]
]
]
]


{{DEFAULTSORT:Swinka, Jakub}}
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 23:31, 24 July 2024

13th / 14th century Polish Catholic archbishop
His Excellency
Jakub Świnka
Archbishop of Gniezno
ChurchRoman Catholic
ArchdioceseGniezno
Installed1283
Term ended1314
PredecessorMartin of Opava
SuccessorBorzysław I
Personal details
Bornunknown
Died4 March 1314
Coat of armsCoat of arms of Archbishop Jakub Swinka

Jakub Świnka (died 4 March 1314) was a Polish Catholic priest, the Archbishop of Gniezno and a notable politician and statesman, supporter of the idea of unification of all Polish lands under the rule of Władysław I the Elbow-high ("the Short"). His coat of arms was Świnka.

Life

Little is known about the early life of Jakub Świnka, nor are his parents known. It is thought he came from a pagan family and his grandmother was a herbalist, which inevitably at that time included elements of paganism. Świnka was a descendant of a noble family from Greater Poland or Silesia coat of arms Świnka. His family started a career in Greater Poland, but with limited success. It is known that his elder brother Sułek did not hold any official posts while his uncle Jan Świnka was mentioned in 1286 as the castellan of a town of Spycimierz.

Jakub Świnka probably joined the Catholic priesthood and it is also probable that he graduated from a law school – probably in Kraków or Prague. In the 1270s he was promoted to the post of a cantor of the chapter in Gniezno. For his service to the Dukes of Greater Poland, most notably to Bolesław the Pious and to Przemysł II he was awarded, on 8 January 1294, with the village of Polanowo.

Świnka was consecrated as archbishop in Kalisz on 30 July 1283 and the results of the voting were accepted by Pope Martin IV on 19 December the same year. The election of a Polish archbishop was seen by the rulers of Greater Poland as a chance to break the links with the Holy Roman Empire, and on 1 August 1284 Duke Przemysł II granted the bishops of Gniezno with a privilege to mint their own coins. This strengthened their power significantly.

From the earliest days of his reign, Świnka faced a strong opposition to his rule. The most important issues were the problem of the diocese of Włocławek (to which belonged both the cities of Słupsk and Gdańsk) that was claimed both by the Polish bishop of Gniezno and the German bishops of Merseburg, and the struggle for dominance over the Catholics in Poland between Polish and German hierarchs. The latter problem was seen as the most important, since several monasteries in Lower Silesia decided to break the links with its Polish-Bohemian province and apply for membership in the Saxon branch of the Franciscan order.

To counter the expansion of German, Świnka organized a synod that took place on 6 January 1285 in Łęczyca. During the meeting, he ordered all priests that were subject to his bishopric to give their sermons in Polish rather than German. To further unify the church in Poland he also organized a series of synods held every couple of years, which served as a means to control the changes within the church. The synods were:

  1. Łęczyca, 6 January 1285
  2. Łęczyca, 26 October 1287
  3. Gniezno, 14 October 1290
  4. Gniezno, April 1298
  5. unknown place, May 1306
  6. Gniezno, May 1309

As a politician, Jakub Świnka was a strong supporter of the idea of re-unification of Poland, divided onto separate duchies after the death of Bolesław III Wrymouth. To unify the Polish lands culturally and oppose the aggressive German culture, he strongly promoted the cult of St. Adalbert of Prague, one of the patron saints of Poland. To further his cause, he tried to diminish the tensions between the dukes of various parts of Poland and the Catholic bishops. This was the case with bishop of Wrocław Tomasz II Zaremba and the Duke of Silesia Henry IV the Righteous, whom Świnka wanted to reconcile.

Jakub Świnka was also a strong supporter of Duke of Greater Poland Przemysł II. Until recently it was believed that Świnka was the main architect of an alliance signed in 1287 by the most notable dukes of Poland of the Piast dynasty, among them Henry IV the Righteous, Leszek the Black, Przemysł II and Henry III of Głogów. However, recent studies show that the ongoing conflicts between the dukes of various parts of divided Poland make the existence of such an alliance highly unlikely.

However, after the congress of Kalisz, held in January 1293, such an alliance between Przemysł II, Wladislaus the Short and his brother Casimir II was indeed concluded. The three dukes agreed to support each other in the effort of retaking the lands of Lesser Poland conquered by Wenceslaus II of Bohemia. Świnka was to become a full member of the alliance, probably responsible for propaganda and gathering support of the Pope and the Catholic Church. On 12 January he was also promised a huge reward if Kraków is taken: 300 golden coins a year from the salt mines of Wieliczka and additional 100 golden coins a year for three years after the victory.

On 26 July 1295 Jakub Świnka concluded his first major political victory: despite lack of papal acceptance, he crowned Przemysł II the King of Poland in the cathedral of Gniezno. Although the ruler controlled only a small part of the Polish domain, he was given a powerful weapon against the Bohemian rulers who also had claims to the Polish throne. Because of great authority of the bishop, the act of coronation was not questioned by any European ruler of the epoch. However, the reign of Przemysł II lasted only 7 months: on 8 February 1296 he was murdered in Rogoźno by the Brandenburgians. Following the treaty Kalisz, Świnka backed up Wladislaus the Short, whom he considered the strongest of the candidates to the throne of Greater Poland and Pomerania, and possibly the only ruler who could reunite Poland and liberate it of Bohemian influence.

Wladislaus assumed the power in Greater Poland and Pomerania, and added those lands to his tiny domain of Cuyavia. However, the struggle against other pretenders (Henry III of Głogów and Wenceslaus II of Bohemia) weakened his rule and finally led to a conflict with the Catholic hierarchy. Świnka broke the pacts he had with Wladislaus, and on 25 July 1300 crowned Wenceslaus II as the King of Poland. It is probable that he lost his belief in weak Wladislaus and saw the new king as the Slavic ruler who could be able to group all Polish lands in one hand. However, the new ruler adopted a pro-German position and started promoting Germanized Silesians over Polish-speaking priests and politicians. Since 1304 king Wenceslaus also supported Jan Muskata, Kraków bishop of German-Silesian origin, in his struggle for separation of the Diocese of Kraków from the bishopric of Gniezno, which only embittered the conflict. This led to yet another vote, after which Świnka resumed good relation with dukes of Cuyavia, relatives of defeated Wladislaus.

After the sudden death of Wenceslaus II on 21 June 1305, Świnka yet again supported Wladislaus. It is not known how he reacted to assassination of Wenceslaus' son, Wenceslaus III of Bohemia less than a year later. After a short fight, Wladislaus recaptured all his lands in Cuyavia, and then conquered Lesser Poland and Pomerania. Greater Poland, to which the city of Gniezno belongs, was conquered by Henry III of Głogów and Jakub Świnka moved to Uniejów and Łowicz, cities controlled by Wladislaus.

On 20 March 1306 Świnka restarted the conflict against Jan Muskata. This time the bishop of Kraków was not backed by the rulers of Bohemia who lost all their influence in Poland, while Świnka was strongly endorsed by Wladislaus. This led to Muskata being deprived of his post on 14 June 1308. The archbishop of Gniezno resumed his control over Lesser Poland. However, after 1311 there are no mentions of his political activity. It is probable that he retired due to old age and poor health.

He died on 4 March 1314 and was buried in St. George's Church, Gniezno. It took another six years for his protégé Wladislaus to finally reunite Poland and be crowned as Polish king.

See also

Further reading

Detailed biographies bolded
  • Abraham W., Studia krytyczne do dziejów średniowiecznych synodów prowincjonalnych Kościoła polskiego, Kraków 1917.
  • Baszkiewicz J., Polska czasów Łokietka, Warszawa 1968.
  • Baszkiewicz J., Powstanie zjednoczonego państwa polskiego na przełomie XIII i XIV wieku, Warszawa 1954.
  • Bieniak J., Wielkopolska, Kujawy, ziemie łęczycka i sieradzka wobec problemu zjednoczenia państwowego w latach 1300–1306, “Roczniki Towarzystwa Naukowego w Toruniu”, R. LXXIV, 1969, z. 2.
  • Bieniak J., Zjednoczenie państwa polskiego, Polska dzielnicowa i zjednoczona, pod red. A. Gieysztora, Warszawa 1972.
  • Długopolski E., Władysław Łokietek na tle swoich czasów, Wrocław 1951.
  • Dowiat J., Historia kościoła katolickiego w Polsce (do połowy XV wieku), Warszawa 1968.
  • Dowiat J., Polska państwem średniowiecznej Europy, Warszawa 1968.
  • Karasiewicz W., Episkopat, jego działalność, wybitne jednostki, Historia Kościoła w Polsce, pod red. B. Kumora, Z. Obertyńskiego, t. I, cz. 1., Poznań-Warszawa 1974.
  • Karasiewicz W., Jakób II Świnka, arcybiskup gnieźnieński, Poznań 1948.
  • Korytkowski J., Arcybiskupi gnieźnieńscy, prymasowie i metropolici polscy od roku 1000 aż do roku 1821, t. I, Poznań 1888.
  • Kumor B., Kościół w obronie polskości. Działalność metropolity Jakuba Świnki, Historia Kościoła w Polsce, pod red. B. Kumora, Z. Obertyńskiego, t. I, cz. 1., Poznań-Warszawa 1974.
  • Morawski M., Synod prowincjonalny prowincji gnieźnieńskiej w dawnej Polsce, Włocławek 1935.
  • Nitecki P., Biskupi Kościoła w Polsce. Słownik biograficzny, Warszawa 1992.
  • Pietras T., "Krwawy wilk z pastorałem". Biskup krakowski Jan zwany Muskatą, Warszawa 2001.
  • Silnicki T., Gołąb K., Arcybiskup Jakub Świnka i jego epoka, Warszawa 1956.
  • Subera I., Synody prowincjonalne arcybiskupów gnieźnieńskich, Warszawa 1971.
  • Szostkiewicz Z., Katalog biskupów obrządku łacińskiego przedrozbiorowej Polski, „Sacrum Polaniae Millennium”, t. I, 1954. 1925, nr 7–12.
  • Tymieniecki K., Jakub Świnka, PSB, t. X, Wrocław-Warszawa-Kraków 1962–1964.
  • Zachorowski S., Wiek XIII i panowanie Władysława Łokietka, Grodecki R., Zachorowski S., Dąbrowski J., Dzieje Polski Średniowiecznej, t. I, Kraków 1926.

References

  1. Płomienna korona

External links

Catholic Church titles
Preceded byMartin of Opava Archbishop of Gniezno
1283–1314 		Succeeded byBorzysław I
Categories: