| Revision as of 00:51, 8 March 2008 editHangingCurve (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers100,943 editsm Reverted 1 edit by Im advertiseing identified as vandalism to last revision by Doc glasgow. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:28, 14 October 2024 edit undoZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,172 edits Earth's magnetic field listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper) | ||
| (97 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I haven't broken a single rule, and I'm being banned by people who hold personal grudges against me. Several Wikipedians have questioned the validity of this ban, so there is clearly not consensus, and meanwhile those banning me have utterly ignored the entire dispute resolution process; in addition, they have banned me from IRC, the mailing list, and are censoring my user_talk page so as to prevent me from having any chance of ever appealing this. All I want is a fair trial before the arbitration committee, where the specific evidence against me is spelled out, and I am given a chance to present my side of the story.|decline=arbcom-l (at) lists (dot) wikimedia.org ]<sup>g</sup> 19:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)}} | |||
| '''Note to all. I have unblocked this user per e-mail assurances of productive contributions to articles from here. I'm giving a final chance. The next 50 edits (at least) will be constructive content. If clear disruption recommences, Lir may be reblocked. But I will take a dim view of anyone provoking. Please let Lir try to do what he's promised to do. If you don't need to post on this page, please do not.'''--]<sup>g</sup> 21:48, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==] of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| The page ] has been speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This was done under ], because it was an ] disambiguation page which either | |||
| :::*disambiguated only one extant Misplaced Pages page and whose title ended in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a ]); | |||
| :::* disambiguated zero extant Misplaced Pages pages, regardless of its title; or | |||
| :::*was a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that did not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function. | |||
| Under the ], such pages may be deleted at any time. Please ]. | |||
| Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=SmarTruck|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at ]. <!-- Template:Db-disambig-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 22:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=As far as I know, the correct procedure for blocking someone requires that the individual with a complaint file a request for arbitration; this has not been done, which makes this an excellent example of how certain users are consistently abusing their authority. The arbcom ruling against me allows people to revert controversial edits, but not to unilaterally ban me indefinitely without trial. In any case, when the system allows rogue admins to block users indefinitely without trial, then there is clearly a serious judicial review problem here. | |||
| == "Hierachy" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 24#Hierachy}} until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <small>]</small> <sup>]</sup> 08:47, 24 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| My ban is not only against the rules of Misplaced Pages, but it has nothing to do with whether or not I am actively contributing to articles (in fact, I can't actively contribute, because of the hostile attitude of corrupt admins), and this ultimately has everything to do with the fact that I have complained about the way some admins treat the common users -- in other words, this ban was politically motivated. Furthermore, it is absurd to claim that I am here causing trouble and making personal attacks, while someone like User:Calton is clearly doing just that, and yet he is never sanctioned for his overtly hostile behavior; meanwhile, whom exactly have I made a personal attack against? As far as I can tell, absolutely nobody. All I want to do is edit the Misplaced Pages like any other user, but it seems some users are more equal than others. Any mis-step we make is used as justification for a ban, while everytime they do something wrong they can quote "Ignore All Rules". --Sheer Hypocrisy--|decline=We're here to write an encyclopedia. You're evidently not. Unless some admin thinks differently, consider this a community ban. Wikilawyering will not work— ]<sup>g</sup> 17:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)}} | |||
| <blockquote>'''No evidence of meeting ].'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| "All I want to do is edit the Misplaced Pages like any other user". OK. Here's the deal. Are you willing to prove that to a community that thinks (on very good evidence) that you are a pure troll? I'm willing to AGF and give you a final last chance to prove that. I will unblock you, *if* you e-mail me and agree that your next 50 edits will all, unequivocally, be ones that relate directly to article improvement. Are you up for that. Anything short of a clear "yes", and I will ignore your e-mail and not be interested in helping you any further. One violation from the agreement and you get re-blocked.--]<sup>g</sup> 19:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 20:02, 25 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 15:28, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:28, 14 October 2024
Lir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I haven't broken a single rule, and I'm being banned by people who hold personal grudges against me. Several Wikipedians have questioned the validity of this ban, so there is clearly not consensus, and meanwhile those banning me have utterly ignored the entire dispute resolution process; in addition, they have banned me from IRC, the mailing list, and are censoring my user_talk page so as to prevent me from having any chance of ever appealing this. All I want is a fair trial before the arbitration committee, where the specific evidence against me is spelled out, and I am given a chance to present my side of the story.
Decline reason:
arbcom-l (at) lists (dot) wikimedia.org Doc 19:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Speedy deletion of SmarTruck
The page SmarTruck has been speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This was done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was an orphaned disambiguation page which either
- disambiguated only one extant Misplaced Pages page and whose title ended in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguated zero extant Misplaced Pages pages, regardless of its title; or
- was a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that did not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Deletion Review. Liz 22:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
"Hierachy" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Hierachy and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 24 § Hierachy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris 08:47, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of List of satellites which have provided data on Earth's magnetosphere
The article List of satellites which have provided data on Earth's magnetosphere has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of meeting WP:NLIST.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:02, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Earth's magnetic field
Earth's magnetic field has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:28, 14 October 2024 (UTC)