Misplaced Pages

Depiction of Jesus: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:12, 9 March 2008 editWillOakland (talk | contribs)2,848 edits General history: remove very confused and rambling paragraph← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:57, 15 December 2024 edit undoInherentDogma (talk | contribs)97 edits See also 
(871 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Christian icons or images depicting Jesus}}
] ] with the ] in a ] form, used throughout the ]]]
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2015}}
There is no undisputed historical '''depiction of ]'''.
]. One of the first bearded images of Jesus, late 4th century.]]
{{Jesus |expanded=in culture}}


The '''depiction of Jesus''' in pictorial form dates back to ], as ] was rejected within ].<ref name=Irenaeus1>Philip Schaff commenting on Irenaeus, wrote, 'This censure of images as a Gnostic peculiarity, and as a heathenish corruption, should be noted'. Footnote 300 on Contr. Her. .I.XXV.6. ANF</ref><ref name=Elvira36>], 'Pictures are not to be placed in churches, so that they do not become objects of worship and adoration', AD 306, Canon 36</ref><ref>], "The Cult of Images in the Age before Iconoclasm", ''Dumbarton Oaks Papers'', Vol. 8, (1954), pp.&nbsp;83–150, Dumbarton Oaks, Trustees for Harvard University, </ref><ref name="The Westminster theological journal pp. 35–47">{{cite journal | title=The Early Church on the Aniconic Spectrum | journal=The Westminster Theological Journal | volume=83 | issue=1 | issn=0043-4388 | pages=35–47 | url=https://ixtheo.de/Record/1765247462 | access-date=March 2, 2022}}</ref> It took several centuries to reach a conventional standardized form for his physical appearance, which has subsequently remained largely stable since that time. Most images of ] have in common a number of traits which are now almost universally associated with Jesus, although variants are seen.
The most common illustration are ] ]s. Images flourished in ]. Most surviving images of Jesus have in common a number of appearance traits which are now almost universally associated with Jesus despite lack of evidence for the accuracy of these depictions.


The conventional image of a fully bearded Jesus with long hair emerged around AD 300, but did not become established until the 6th century in ], and much later in the West. It has always had the advantage of being easily recognizable, and distinguishing Jesus from other figures shown around him, which the use of a ] also achieves. Earlier images were much more varied.
==General history==
No detailed physical description of Jesus is contained in any of the ]ical ]s. During the ]'s ], Christian art was necessarily furtive and ambiguous. The earliest surviving Christian art comes from the late 3rd and early 4th centuries on the walls of ] ]s in the ]s. Here, and only here, Jesus is portrayed in two different ways: older, bearded and robed and another as a bare faced youth holding a wand. He uses the wand to ], ], and raise ]. When pictured healing, he only ]. The wand is thought to be a symbol of power. The bare faced youth with the wand may indicate that the Jesus was thought of as a user of magic or a wonder worker by some ].<ref>''New Catholic Encyclopedia'': ''Portraits of the Apostoles''</ref> <ref>''The Two Faces of Jesus '' by Robin M. Jensen, ''Bible Review'', 17.8, Oct 2002</ref> Some scholars suggest that the ], the ] and ] (the so-called ]), portray such a wonder worker, user of magic, a magician, or a Divine man.<ref> ''Jesus, the Magician'' by Morton Smith, Harper & Row, 1978.</ref> (Only the Apostle Peter is also depicted in ancient art with a wand). The mysterious images of "]" a beardless youth in ] scenes collecting ]; also found in this early art, are also interpreted by some as Jesus, or ]. <ref>''The Two Faces of Jesus'' by Robin M. Jensen, ''Bible Review'', 17.8, October 2002</ref> <ref> ''Understanding Early Christian Art'' by Robin M. Jensen, Routledge, 2000</ref> Once the bearded, long-haired Jesus became the official and real traditional representation of Jesus, his facial features began to take shape and become recognizable.


Images of Jesus tend to show ethnic characteristics similar to those of the culture in which the image has been created. Beliefs that certain images are historically authentic, or have acquired an authoritative status from Church tradition, remain powerful among some of the faithful, in Eastern Orthodoxy, Lutheranism, Anglicanism, and Roman Catholicism. The ] is now the best-known example, though the ] and the ] were better known in medieval times.{{Not verified in body|date=April 2012}}
{{Jesus}}


The representation of Jesus was controversial in the early period; the regional ] in Spain in 306 states in its 36th canon that no images should be in churches.<ref>Lisa Maurice, ''Screening Divinity'', Edinburgh University Press, Scotland, 2019, p. 30</ref> Later, in the ], ] banned and destroyed images of Christ for a period, before they returned in full strength. In the 16th-century ], the followers of ] in particular saw images of Christ as ] and enforced their removal.<ref>Robin M. Jensen, ''The Cross: History, Art, and Controversy'', Harvard University Press, USA, 2017, p. 185</ref> Due to their understanding of the second of the ], most ] still avoid displaying representations of Jesus in their places of worship.<ref>Cameron J. Anderson, ''The Faithful Artist: A Vision for Evangelicalism and the Arts'', InterVarsity Press, USA, 2016, p. 124</ref><ref>Doug Jones, ''Sound of Worship'', Taylor & Francis, Abingdon-on-Thames, 2013, p. 90</ref>
==Christian depiction of Jesus==
The earliest Christians did not often depict Jesus, if they did at all, using instead symbols such as the ] (''fish''), the ] (or ''Chi-Rho''), or an anchor. Common themes in early Christian art are Jesus as a healer and the ] of Jesus (who is generally shown standing in water up to the ankles, as ] pours water over his head). This sort of imagery dominated the first centuries of Christian art.


== Early Christianity ==
], it reads: "Alexamenos worships god."]]
=== Before Constantine ===
As Christianity emerged from the catacombs and became a state religion, the images of Jesus began to take on a more imperial look. He was depicted in royal robes, and the ] became very prominent. Themes of the Good Shepherd still remain, as can be seen on the ] ] in the church of ] in Rome, where the ] are depicted as twelve sheep below the imperial Jesus. By this time Jesus had begun to be depicted with the distinctive "look" that dominated much of the history of art, with shoulder-length hair and a beard.
] slab with the '']'' from the ], 3rd century. Plaster cast with added colour.]]
Except for Jesus wearing ]—the tassels on a ]—in Matthew 14:36<ref name=matthew14></ref> and Luke 8:43–44,<ref name="luke8"></ref> there is no physical description of Jesus contained in any of the canonical ]s. In the ], Jesus is said to have manifested as a "light from heaven" that temporarily blinded the ], but no specific form is given. In the ] there is ] of "someone like a ]" in spirit form: "dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest. The hair on his head were white like wool, and his eyes were like blazing fire. His feet were like burnt bronze glowing in a furnace (...) His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance" (Revelation 1:12–16, ]). Use in art of the Revelation description of Jesus has generally been restricted to illustrations of the book itself, and nothing in the scripture confirms the spiritual form's resemblance to the physical form Jesus took in his life on Earth.


In the first-century AD, many Jews understood Exodus 20:4–6 ("]") as a proscription against any depiction of humans or animals. Consequently, no figure art was produced for, or by, the Jewish communities in Judea and Galilee during Jesus' lifetime, or in the decades that followed.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Taylor |first=Joan E. |title=What did Jesus look like? |date=2018 |publisher=Bloomsbury T&T Clark |isbn=978-0-567-67150-9 |location=London |page=1-14}}</ref> But attitudes towards the interpretation of this Commandment changed through the centuries, and by the third century, some Jewish communities were producing figure art. The frescos decorating the interior of ] (c. 240 AD) depict many scenes from ]. They are the earliest-known examples of Jewish figure art.<ref>], Gohei Hata, et al. ''Eusebius, Christianity, and Judaism''. Wayne, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1992. pp. 283–284.</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Baird |first=Jennifer A. |title=Dura-Europos |date=2018 |publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |isbn=978-1-4725-2365-5 |series=Archaeological histories |location=London New York Oxford New Delhi Sydney |page=139-141}}</ref>
French scholar Paul Vignon has listed fifteen similarities (like ]) between most of the icons of Jesus at the time, particularly in the icons of "Christ Pantocrator" ("The all-powerful Messiah"). He claims that these are due to the availability of the ] (which he claims to be identical to the ]) to the artists.


During the ], Christian art was necessarily furtive and ambiguous, and there was hostility to ] in a group still with a large component of members with Jewish origins, surrounded by, and polemicising against, sophisticated pagan images of gods. ] (d. c. 202), ] (d. 215), ] (c. 240–c. 320) and ] (d. c. 339) disapproved of portrayals in images of Jesus. {{citation needed|date=January 2020}} The 36th canon of the non-ecumenical ] in 306 AD reads, "It has been decreed that no pictures be had in the churches, and that which is worshipped or adored be not painted on the walls",<ref name="Elvira2">English translation found at Catholic University of America, accessed 5 September 2012 </ref> which has been interpreted by ] and other ] as an interdiction of the making of images of Christ.<ref name=Calvin>John Calvin ''Institutes of the Christian Religion'' Book 1, Chapter V. Section 6.</ref> The issue remained the subject of controversy until the end of the 4th century.<ref>Hellemo, pp. 3–6, and Cartlidge and Elliott, 61 (Eusebius quotation) and ''passim''. Clement approved the use of symbolic pictograms.</ref>
===Alexamenos graffito===
{{main|Alexamenos graffito}}
The earliest image believed by some to be of Jesus is a piece of ] wall ] near the ] in ]. It was apparently drawn by a Roman soldier to mock another soldier who was a Christian. The caption reads, in ], "Alexamenos worships God", while the image shows a man raising his hand toward a crucified figure with a donkey's head. The head of the donkey seems to refer to a Roman misconception about ]ish religion, so that the image would be at once ] and ]. A small minority of scholars dispute whether this image depicts Jesus, proposing that this image may be a reference to ] {{Fact|date=February 2007}} or another deity.


The earliest surviving Christian art comes from the late 2nd to early 4th centuries on the walls of tombs belonging, most likely, to wealthy<ref>''The Second Church: Popular Christianity A.D. 200–400'' by Ramsay MacMullen, The Society of Biblical Literature, 2009</ref> Christians in the ], although from literary evidence there may well have been panel ]s which, like almost all ], have disappeared.
===Conventional depictions===
Conventional depictions of Christ include:
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*] (mother and dead son)
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]


], dating from about 235]]
===Unconventional depictions===
Many modern artists have focused on the ]al aspects of the Jesus story and thus some have created images with unconventional depictions of Jesus, sometimes to reflect a belief in the universality and non-literal existence of Jesus. Hence there are paintings of black, European, and Chinese Jesuses, and also of Jesus as a woman.
<div style="clear: both"></div>


Initially Jesus was represented indirectly by ] symbols such as the ] (fish), the ], or an anchor (the ] or Chi-Rho was a later development). The ] seems to have been a very early representation of the crucified Jesus within the sacred texts. Later personified symbols were used, including ], whose three days in the belly of the whale pre-figured the interval between Christ's death and ]; ] in the lion's den; or ] charming the animals.<ref>Orpheus as a symbol for ] was already found in hellenized Jewish art. Hall, 66</ref> The image of "]", a ]less youth in ] scenes collecting sheep, was the most common of these images, and was probably not understood as a portrait of the historical Jesus at this period.<ref>Syndicus, 21–3</ref> It continues the classical ] ("ram-bearer" figure), and in some cases may also represent the ], a popular Christian literary work of the 2nd century.<ref>Cartlidge and Elliott, 53–55. See also ''The Two Faces of Jesus'' by Robin M. Jensen, ''Bible Review'', 17.8, October 2002, and ''Understanding Early Christian Art'' by Robin M. Jensen, Routledge, 2000</ref>
==Miraculous images==
{{main|Acheiropoieta}}
]'s negative of his photo of the ]. Many Christians believe this image to be the ]]]
There are, however, some images which have been claimed to realistically show how Jesus looked. One early tradition, recorded by ], says that ] once washed his face with water and then dried it with a cloth, leaving an image of his face imprinted on the cloth. This was sent by him to King ], who had sent a messenger asking Jesus to come and heal him of his disease. This image, called the ''Mandylion'' or ], appears in history in around ]. Numerous replicas of this "]" remain in circulation. As recently as the 19th century, it was not uncommon to find prints of this icon in the homes of Anglicans, along with framed copies of the correspondence between Jesus Christ and the King of Edessa.{{Fact|date=August 2007}}


Among the earliest depictions clearly intended to directly represent Jesus himself are many showing him as a baby, usually held by his mother, especially in the '']'', seen as the first ], or display of the ] Christ to the world at large.<ref>Hall, 70–71</ref> The oldest known portrait of Jesus, found in ] and dated to about 235, shows him as a beardless young man of authoritative and dignified bearing. He is depicted with close-cropped hair and wearing a tunic and ]—the common male dress for much of Greco-Roman society, and similar to that found in the figure art in the Dura-Europos Synagogue.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Turner |first=Katie |title=Bloomsbury CJL |chapter=Clothing and Dress in the Time of Jesus |date=2022 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing |isbn=978-1-350-92807-7 |edition=1 |doi=10.5040/9781350928077.003}}</ref>
The current image used by the Vatican is based on the ], whose records go back to ]. Controversy still surrounds the Shroud of Turin and some have speculated it to be the same image as the Mandylion of Edessa, which disappeared in the wars surrounding the fall of the ] shortly before then. The image from the Shroud of Turin is based on amateur photographer ]'s photograph of 1898 and is used by the Vatican as part of the official ] to the ]. The image can not be clearly seen on the ] with the naked eye and surprised Pia to the extent that he stated that he almost dropped and broke the photographic plate when he first saw the developed image on it the evening of May 28, 1898.


The appearance of Jesus had some theological implications. While some Christians thought Jesus should have the beautiful appearance of a young classical hero,<ref>Zanker, 299</ref> and the ]s tended to think he could change his appearance at will, for which they cited the ] as evidence,<ref>Every, George; ''Christian Mythology'', p. 65, Hamlyn 1988 (1970 1st edn.) {{ISBN|0-600-34290-5}}</ref> others including the Church Fathers ] (d. 165) and ] (d. 220) believed, following ] 53:2, that Christ's appearance was unremarkable:<ref>Syndicus, 92</ref> "he had no form nor comeliness, that we should look upon him, nor beauty that we should delight in him." But when the pagan ] ridiculed the Christian religion for having an ugly God in about 180, ] (d. 248) cited ] 45:3: "Gird thy sword upon thy thigh, mighty one, with thy beauty and fairness"<ref>Cartlidge and Elliott, 53 – this is Psalm 44 in the Latin ]; English bible translations prefer "glory" and "majesty"</ref> Later the emphasis of leading Christian thinkers changed; ] (d. 420) and ] (d. 430) argued that Jesus must have been ideally beautiful in face and body. For Augustine he was "beautiful as a child, beautiful on earth, beautiful in heaven."
Prior to 1898 devotions to the ] used an image based on the ], where legend recounts that Veronica from Jerusalem encountered Jesus along the ] on the way to ]. When she paused to wipe the sweat from Jesus's face with her veil, the image was imprinted on the cloth.


], Rome. Second half of the 4th century. Such works "first present us with the fully formed image of ] that will so dominate Byzantine art."<ref>Zanker, 302.</ref> For detail of Christ, see ].]]
The establishment of these images as ] traces back to Sister ] and the ] ] who started and promoted them from 1844 to 1874 in ] France, and Sister ] De Micheli who associated the image from the Shroud of Turin with the devotion in 1936 in ] Italy.
] in a ] in the church of ], Rome, c. 400–410 AD during the ]]]


From the 3rd century onwards, the first narrative scenes from the '']'' to be clearly seen are the '']'', painted in a catacomb in about 200,<ref>Schiller, I 132. The image comes from the crypt of ] in the ]. There are a number of other 3rd-century images.</ref> and the miracle of the '']'',<ref>Painted over 40 times in the catacombs of Rome, from the early 3rd century on, and also on sarcophagii. As with the ''Baptism'', some early examples are from ]. Schiller, I, 181</ref> both of which can be clearly identified by the inclusion of the dove of the ] in ''Baptisms'', and the vertical, shroud-wrapped body of Lazarus. Other scenes remain ambiguous—an '']'' may be intended as a '']'', but before the development of a recognised physical appearance for Christ, and attributes such as the ], it is impossible to tell, as ''tituli'' or captions are rarely used. There are some surviving scenes from Christ's ''Works'' of about 235 from the ] on the Persian frontier of the Empire. During the 4th century a much greater number of scenes came to be depicted,<ref>Syndicus, 94–95</ref> usually showing Christ as youthful, beardless and with short hair that does not reach his shoulders, although there is considerable variation.<ref>Syndicus, 92–93, </ref>] of '']'', ], {{circa}} 6th century, showing the appearance of Jesus that is still immediately recognised today.]]
There are also ] compositions of Jesus and Mary that are traditionally believed by many ] to have originated in paintings by ].
<div style="clear:both;"></div>


Jesus is sometimes shown performing miracles by means of a wand,<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12294b.htm | title=Catholic Encyclopedia: Portraits of the Apostles | access-date=10 August 2008}}</ref> as on the doors of ] in Rome (430–32). He uses the ] to ], ], and raise ].<ref>Cartlidge and Elliott, 60</ref> When pictured healing, he only ]. The wand is thought to be a symbol of power. The bare-faced youth with the wand may indicate that Jesus was thought of as a user of magic or wonder worker by some of the early Christians.<ref>'' The Two Faces of Jesus'' by Robin M. Jensen, ''Bible Review, 17.8, Oct 2002</ref><ref name="ReferenceA">''New Catholic Encyclopedia: Portraits of the Apostles''</ref> No art has been found picturing Jesus with a wand before the 2nd century. Some scholars suggest that the ], the ] and the ] (the so-called ]), portray such a wonder worker, user of magic, a magician or a Divine man.<ref>''Jesus, the Magician'' by Morton Smith, Harper & Row, 1978</ref> Only the Apostle Peter is also depicted in ancient art with a wand.<ref name="ReferenceA" /> Research by Lee M. Jefferson however, argued that the depiction of Jesus holding a wand is not an attempt to portray Jesus as a magician or magic user, but rather a continuity of biblical tradition of Moses's staff. It is also argued that early Christians were strong in their rejection of magic and anything related to it.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://library.biblicalarchaeology.org/article/jesus-the-magician-why-jesus-holds-a-wand-in-early-christian-art/ |title=Jesus the Magician? Why Jesus holds a wand in early Christian art |last=Jefferson |first=Lee M. | date= 2020| website=Biblical Archaeology Society Library |access-date= February 25, 2024}}</ref>
==Jesus in Islam==


Another depiction, seen from the late 3rd century or early 4th century onwards, showed Jesus with a beard, and within a few decades can be very close to the conventional type that later emerged.<ref>Zanker, 302</ref> This depiction has been said to draw variously on Imperial imagery, the type of the classical philosopher,<ref>Zanker, 300–303, who is rather dismissive of other origins for the type</ref> and that of ], leader of the Greek gods, or ], his Roman equivalent,<ref>Syndicus, 93</ref> and the protector of Rome. According to art historian Paul Zanker, the bearded type has long hair from the start, and a relatively long beard (contrasting with the short "classical" beard and hair always given to St Peter, and most other apostles);<ref>Cartlidge and Elliott, 56–57. St Paul often has a long beard, but short hair, as in the catacomb fresco illustrated. St ] also often has long hair and a beard, and often retains in later art the thick shaggy or wavy long hair seen on some of the earliest depictions of Jesus, and in images of philosophers of the Charismatic type.</ref> this depiction is specifically associated with "Charismatic" philosophers like ], ] and ], some of whom were claimed to perform miracles.<ref>Zanker, 257–266 on the charismatics; 299–306 on the type used for Christ</ref>
Several ] quote the Prophet Muhammad describing ] (the Islamic name of Jesus) as he appeared in a dream, and during prophet Muhammad's ]:


After the very earliest examples of c. 300, this depiction is mostly used for hieratic images of Jesus, and scenes from his life are more likely to use a beardless, youthful type.<ref>Zanker, pp. 299, note 48, and 300. . See also Cartlidge and Elliott, 55–61.</ref> The tendency of older scholars such as Talbot Rice to see the beardless Jesus as associated with a "classical" artistic style and the bearded one as representing an "Eastern" one drawing from ancient Syria, ] and ] seems impossible to sustain, and does not feature in more recent analyses. Equally attempts to relate on a consistent basis the explanation for the type chosen in a particular work to the differing theological views of the time have been unsuccessful.<ref>Grabar, 119</ref> From the 3rd century on, some Christian leaders, such as ], had recommended the wearing of beards by Christian men.<ref>Zanker, 290</ref> The centre parting was also seen from early on, and was also associated with long-haired philosophers.
:"Narrated Abdullah: The Prophet mentioned...While sleeping near the Ka'ba last night, I saw in my dream a man of ''brown color the best one can see amongst brown color and his hair was long that it fell between his shoulders''. His hair was lank and water was dribbling from his head and he was placing his hands on the shoulders of two men while circumambulating the Kaba. I asked, 'Who is this?' They replied, 'This is Jesus, son of Mary.'" (Bukhari {{Bukhari-usc|4|55|649}})
]. "I am the way and the truth and the life" (John 14:6) reads the inscription. ], after 500]]


=== After Constantine ===
:"Narrated Salim from his father: No, By Allah, the Prophet did not tell that Jesus was of ''red complexion'' but said, "While I was asleep circumambulating the Ka'ba (in my dream), suddenly I saw a man of ''brown complexion and lank hair'' walking between two men, and water was dropping from his head. I asked, 'Who is this?' The people said, 'He is the son of Mary.'" (Bukhari {{Bukhari-usc|4|55|650}})
From the middle of the 4th century, after Christianity was legalized by the ] in 313, and gained Imperial favour, there was a new range of images of ],<ref>Syndicus, 92–97, though images of Christ the King are found in the previous century also – Hellemo, 6</ref> using either of the two physical types described above, but adopting the costume and often the poses of Imperial ]. These developed into the various forms of ]. Some scholars reject the connection between the political events and developments in iconography, seeing the change as a purely theological one, resulting from the shift of the concept and title of ] ("Ruler of all") from ] (still not portrayed in art) to Christ, which was a development of the same period, perhaps led by ] (d. 373).<ref>Hellemo, 7–14, citing K. Berger in particular.</ref>


Another depiction drew from classical images of philosophers, often shown as a youthful "intellectual ]" in Roman sarcophagii; the '']'' image initially uses this type.<ref>Zanker, 299. Zanker has a full account of the development of the image of Christ at pp. 289–307.</ref> Gradually Jesus became shown as older, and during the 5th century the image with a beard and long hair, now with a cruciform ], came to dominate, especially in the ]. In the earliest large ] ] cycle, in ], ] (c. 520), Jesus is beardless through the period of his ministry until the scenes of the ], after which he is shown with a beard.<ref>The two parts of the cycle are on opposite walls of the nave; Talbot Rice, 157. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120311034755/http://www.bridgemanart.com/search.aspx?key=Ravenna%20Apollinare%20nuovo&filter=CBPOIHV#2%7CCBPOIHV%7C15%7Cx150 |date=11 March 2012 }}</ref>
:"Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle said, "On the night of my Ascension to Heaven...I saw Jesus who was of ''average height with red face'' as if he had just come out of a bathroom." (Bukhari {{Bukhari-usc|4|55|607}})


The Good Shepherd, now clearly identified as Christ, with halo and often rich robes, is still depicted, as on the ] ] in the church of ] in Rome, where the ] are depicted as twelve sheep below the imperial Jesus, or in the ] at Ravenna.
==Examples==

Once the bearded, long-haired Jesus became the conventional representation of Jesus, his facial features slowly began to be standardised, although this process took until at least the 6th century in the ], and much longer in the West, where clean-shaven Jesuses are common until the 12th century, despite the influence of ]. But by the late Middle Ages the beard became almost universal and when ] showed a clean-shaven Apollo-like Christ in his ] fresco in the ] (1534–41) he came under persistent attack in the ] climate of Rome for this, as well as other things.<ref>, Esperanca Camara, Khan Academy; ], ''Artistic Theory in Italy, 1450–1600'', 112–114, 118–119 (refs to 1985 edn), ], {{ISBN|0198810504}}</ref>

French scholar Paul Vignon has listed fifteen similarities, or "marks," between most of the icons of Jesus after this point, particularly in the icons of "Christ Pantocrator" ("The all-powerful Messiah").<ref> by Paul Vignon, Paul Tice, (2002 – {{ISBN|1-885395-96-5}})</ref>{{notinref|date=November 2023}} He claims that these are due to the availability of the ] (which he claims to be identical to the ]) to the artists, via Constantinople. <ref> by Paul Vignon, Paul Tice, ''op. cit.''</ref>{{notinref|date=November 2023}} Certainly images believed to have miraculous origins, or the ], believed to be a portrait of Mary from the life by ], were widely regarded as authoritative by the ] period and greatly influenced depictions. In ] the form of images was, and largely is, regarded as revealed truth, with a status almost equal to scripture, and the aim of artists is to copy earlier images without originality, although the style and content of images does in fact change slightly over time.<ref>Grigg, 5–7</ref>

As to the historical appearance of Jesus, in one possible translation of the apostle Paul's ], Paul urges Christian men of first-century ] not to have long hair.<ref>Regarding the , and in agreement with modern interpretations of the New Testament, Walvoord and Zuck note, "The alternate translation in the NIV margin, which interprets the man's covering as long hair, is largely based on the view that verse 15 equated the covering with long hair. It is unlikely, however, that this was the point of verse 4." John F. Walvoord and Roy B. Zuck, eds., ''The Bible Knowledge Commentary: New Testament'', "1 Corinthians 11:4", (Wheaton: Victor Books, 1983)</ref> An early commentary by ] (c. AD 354 – c. AD 420/440) says, "Paul was complaining because men were fussing about their hair and women were flaunting their locks in church. Not only was this dishonoring to them, but it was also an incitement to fornication."<ref>Institute for Classical Christian Studies (ICCS) and Thomas Oden, eds., ''The Ancient Christian Commentary Series'', "1 Corinthians 1:4", (Westmont: Inter-Varsity Press, 2005), {{ISBN|0-8308-2492-8}}. </ref> Some{{who|date=March 2013}} have speculated that Jesus and/or Paul were ], a temporary vow during which hair is not cut.{{citation needed|date=March 2013}} Critics{{who|date=March 2013}} emphasize that at the time, long hair on men was considered shameful as Paul states in I Corinthians 11:14. Jesus was a practicing Jew so presumably had a beard.{{Citation needed|date=June 2010}}

== Later periods ==
], still with no beard, from an English 12th-century ].]]By the 5th century depictions of the ] began to appear, perhaps reflecting a change in the theological focus of the early Church.<ref name=Benedetto51>''The New Westminster Dictionary of Church History'' by Robert Benedetto 2006 {{ISBN|0-8264-8011-X}} pp. 51–53</ref> The 6th-century ] includes some of the earliest surviving images of the crucifixion and resurrection.<ref name= Benedetto51 /> By the 6th century the bearded depiction of Jesus had become standard in the ], though the ], especially in northern Europe, continued to mix bearded and unbearded depictions for several centuries. The depiction with a longish face, long straight brown hair parted in the middle, and almond shaped eyes shows consistency from the 6th century to the present. Various legends developed which were believed to authenticate the historical accuracy of the standard depiction, such as the ] and later the ].<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|first=Robin M. |last=Jensen |title=Jesus in Christian art|encyclopedia=The Blackwell Companion to Jesus|editor-first=Delbert|editor-last= Burkett|year= 2010 |isbn= 978-1-4443-5175-0 |pages= 477–502 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons}}</ref>

Partly to aid recognition of the scenes, narrative depictions of the ] focused increasingly on the events celebrated in the major feasts of the ], and the events of the Passion, neglecting the miracles and other events of Jesus' public ministry, except for the ], where the mummy-like wrapped body was shown standing upright, giving an unmistakable visual signature.<ref name="Schiller181">''Iconography of Christian Art, Vol. I'' by G. Schiller 1971 Lund Humphries, London. figs 150-53, 346-54. {{ISBN|0-85331-270-2}} pp. 181–184</ref> A ] was worn only by Jesus (and the other persons of the Trinity), while plain halos distinguished Mary, the Apostles and other saints, helping the viewer to read increasingly populated scenes.<ref name="Schiller181" />

The period of ] acted as a barrier to developments in the East, but by the 9th century art was permitted again. The ] was a major theme in the East and every ] monk who had trained in ] painting had to prove his craft by painting an icon of the Transfiguration.<ref name=Bigham226>''The image of God the Father in Orthodox theology and iconography'' by Steven Bigham 1995 {{ISBN|1-879038-15-3}} pp. 226–227</ref> However, while Western depictions increasingly aimed at ], in Eastern icons a low regard for perspective and alterations in the size and proportion of an image aim to reach beyond earthly reality to a spiritual meaning.<ref>] Vasileios of ], "Icons as Liturgical Analogies" in ''Hymn of entry: liturgy and life in the Orthodox church'' 1997 {{ISBN|978-0-88141-026-6}} pp. 81–90</ref>

The 13th century witnessed a turning point in the portrayal of the powerful ] image of Jesus as a ] in the ], as the ] began to emphasize the humility of Jesus both at his birth and his death via the nativity scene as well as the crucifixion.<ref name=Brooke>''The image of St Francis'' by Rosalind B. Brooke 2006 {{ISBN|0-521-78291-0}} pp. 183–184</ref><ref name=Raab>''The tradition of Catholic prayer'' by Christian Raab, Harry Hagan, St. Meinrad Archabbey 2007 {{ISBN|0-8146-3184-3}} pp. 86–87</ref><ref name=GFinger>''The vitality of the Christian tradition'' by George Finger Thomas 1944 {{ISBN|0-8369-2378-2}} pp. 110–112</ref> The Franciscans approached both ends of this spectrum of emotions and as the joys of the ] of were added to the agony of crucifixion a whole new range of emotions were ushered in, with wide-ranging cultural impact on the image of Jesus for centuries thereafter.<ref name=Brooke /><ref name=GFinger /><ref>''La vida sacra: contemporary Hispanic sacramental theology'' by James L. Empereur, Eduardo Fernández 2006 {{ISBN|0-7425-5157-1}} pp. 3–5</ref><ref>''Philippines'' by Lily Rose R. Tope, Detch P. Nonan-Mercado 2005 {{ISBN|0-7614-1475-4}} p. 109</ref>
]'', 1580, by ], whose art reflects both his roots in Greek Orthodox traditions and the Catholic ]]]

After ], ] and others systematically developed uncluttered images that focused on the depiction of Jesus with an ideal human beauty, in works like ]'s '']'', arguably the first ] painting.<ref>''Experiencing Art Around Us'' by Thomas Buser 2005 {{ISBN|978-0-534-64114-6}} pp. 382–383</ref><ref>''Leonardo da Vinci, the Last Supper: a Cosmic Drama and an Act of Redemption'' by Michael Ladwein 2006 pp. 27, 60</ref> Images of Jesus now drew on classical sculpture, at least in some of their poses. However ] was considered to have gone much too far in his beardless Christ in his '']'' fresco in the ], which very clearly adapted classical sculptures of ], and this path was rarely followed by other artists.

The High Renaissance was contemporary with the start of the ] which, ], violently ], and vast numbers were destroyed. Gradually images of Jesus became acceptable to most Protestants in various contexts, especially in narrative contexts, as book illustrations and prints, and later in larger paintings. Protestant art continued the now-standard depiction of the physical appearance of Jesus. Meanwhile, the Catholic ] re-affirmed the importance of art in assisting the devotions of the faithful, and encouraged the production of new images of or including Jesus in enormous numbers, also continuing to use the standard depiction.

During the 17th century, some writers, such as ] in his ] criticized depictions of Jesus with long hair. Although some scholars believed that Jesus wore long hair because he was a ] and therefore could not cut his hair, Browne argues "that our Saviour was a Nazarite after this kind, we have no reason to determine; for he drank Wine, and was therefore called by the Pharisees, a Wine-bibber; he approached also the dead, as when he raised from death Lazarus, and the daughter of Jairus.”<ref>{{cite book |last1=Browne |first1=Thomas |title=The Works of Thomas Browne Vol. 2 |publisher=Gutenberg |url=https://www.gutenberg.org/files/39961/39961-h/39961-h.htm}}</ref>

By the end of the 19th century, new reports of miraculous images of Jesus had appeared and continue to receive significant attention, e.g. ]'s 1898 photograph of the ], one of the most controversial artifacts in history, which during its May 2010 exposition it was visited by over 2 million people.<ref>Arthur Barnes, 2003 ''Holy Shroud of Turin'' Kessinger Press {{ISBN|0-7661-3425-3}} pp. 2–9</ref><ref name=WMeacham>William Meacham, ''The Authentication of the Turin Shroud:An Issue in Archaeological Epistemology'', ], Volume 24, No 3, June 1983</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.zenit.org/rssenglish-29146 |title=Zenit, May 5, 2010 |publisher=Zenit.org |date=5 May 2010 |access-date=4 November 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120927020556/http://www.zenit.org/rssenglish-29146 |archive-date=27 September 2012 |df=dmy-all }}</ref> Another 20th-century depiction of Jesus, namely the ] based on ]'s reported vision has over 100 million followers.<ref>Catherine M. Odell, 1998, ''Faustina: Apostle of Divine Mercy'' OSV Press {{ISBN|978-0-87973-923-2}} p. 165</ref><ref name="With You Always' page 548">''Am With You Always'' by Benedict Groeschel 2010 {{ISBN|978-1-58617-257-2}} p. 548</ref> The first cinematic portrayal of Jesus was in the 1897 film ''La Passion du Christ'' produced in Paris, which lasted 5 minutes.<ref>''The Challenge of the Silver Screen (Studies in Religion and the Arts)'' By Freek L. Bakker 2009 {{ISBN|90-04-16861-3}} p. 1</ref><ref>''Encyclopedia of early cinema'' by Richard Abe 2005 {{ISBN|0-415-23440-9}} p. 518</ref> Thereafter cinematic portrayals have continued to show Jesus with a beard in the standard western depiction that resembles traditional images.<ref name=BWell526>''The Blackwell Companion to Jesus'' edited by Delbert Burkett 2010 {{ISBN|1-4051-9362-X}} p. 526</ref>

A scene from the documentary film '']'' showed American children being unable to identify a common depiction of Jesus, despite recognizing other figures like ] and ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.preachingtoday.com/illustrations/2004/december/15702.html|title="Super Size Me": Recognizing Jesus|access-date=13 August 2020|archive-date=5 July 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220705192208/https://www.preachingtoday.com/illustrations/2004/december/15702.html|url-status=dead}}</ref>

== Conventional depictions ==
Conventional depictions of Christ developed in medieval art include the narrative scenes of the Life of Christ, and many other conventional depictions:

Common narrative scenes from the ] include:
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
Devotional images include:
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] (mother and dead son)
* ]
* ]
* ]

== Range of depictions ==
{{See also|God the Father in Western art}}
] of Jesus]]
Certain local traditions have maintained different depictions, sometimes reflecting local racial characteristics, as do the Catholic and Orthodox depictions. The ] of ] separated in the 5th century, and has a distinctive depiction of Jesus, consistent with ]. The ], also Coptic, developed on Coptic traditions, but shows Jesus and all Biblical figures with the ] appearance of its members.{{citation needed|date=March 2011}} Other traditions in China, Central Asia and elsewhere generally depict the ] as that of the local population (see the gallery below).{{Citation needed|date=October 2024}}

In modern times such variation has become more common, but images following the traditional depiction in both physical appearance and clothing are still dominant, perhaps surprisingly so. In Europe, local ethnic tendencies in depictions of Jesus can be seen, for example in Spanish, German, or ], but almost always surrounding figures are still more strongly characterised. For example, the ], after the vision reported by ], was often shown with blonde hair, but Christ's is very rarely paler than a light brown.{{Citation needed|date=October 2024}}

Some medieval Western depictions, usually of the ], where his disciples do not recognise him at first (Luke.24.13–32), showed Jesus wearing a ].<ref>A 12th-century English example {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100607133945/http://www.getty.edu/art/gettyguide/artObjectDetails?artobj=311098&handle=book&pg=3 |date=7 June 2010 }}</ref>

] than his traditional depictions in Western art.]]
In 2001, the television series '']'' used one of three first-century Jewish skulls from a leading department of ] in Israel to depict Jesus in a new way.<ref name=G1>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2001/mar/27/broadcasting.uknews2|title=Is this the real face of Jesus Christ?|first=Matt|last=Wells|date=27 March 2001|newspaper=]|publisher=]|location=London|issn=0261-3077|oclc=60623878|access-date=12 May 2011}}</ref> A face was constructed using ] by ], a retired medical artist from the Unit of Art in Medicine at the ].<ref name=CNN /> The face that Neave constructed suggested that Jesus would have had a broad face and large nose, and differed significantly from the traditional depictions of Jesus in renaissance art.<ref name=BBC>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/3958241.stm|title=So what color was Jesus?|first=Giles|last=Wilson|date=27 October 2004|work=BBC News |location=London|access-date=12 May 2011}}</ref> Additional information about Jesus' skin color and hair was provided by ], a New Testament scholar and professor at Duke University.<ref name=BBC />

Using third-century images from a synagogue—the earliest pictures of Jewish people<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/experts-reconstruct-face-of-jesus/|title=Experts Reconstruct Face Of Jesus|date=27 March 2001|publisher=]|location=London|access-date=12 May 2011}}</ref>—Goodacre proposed that Jesus' skin color would have been darker and swarthier than his traditional Western image. He also suggested that he would have had short, curly hair and a short cropped beard.<ref name="Popular Mechanics">{{Cite journal|url=http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/forensics/1282186|title=The Real Face Of Jesus|first=Mike|last=Fillon|date=7 December 2002|journal=]|publisher=]|location=San Francisco|issn=0032-4558|oclc=3643271|access-date=12 May 2011}}</ref> Although entirely speculative as the face of Jesus,<ref name=CNN>{{Cite news|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/12/25/face.jesus/|title=From science and computers, a new face of Jesus|first=Jeordan|last=Legon|date=25 December 2002|publisher=CNN|access-date=12 May 2011}}</ref> the result of the study determined that Jesus' skin would have been more olive-colored than white or black,<ref name=BBC /> and that he would have looked like a typical Galilean Semite. Among the points made was that the Bible records that Jesus's disciple Judas had to point him out to those arresting him in ]. The implied argument is that if Jesus's physical appearance had differed markedly from his disciples, then he would have been relatively easy to identify.<ref name="Popular Mechanics" />

== Miraculous images of Jesus ==
{{Main|Acheiropoieta|Divine Mercy image|Head of Christ}}
]'s negative of his 1898 photo of the ]. Many Christians believe this image to be the ].]]
There are, however, some images which have been claimed to realistically show how Jesus looked. One early tradition, recorded by ], says that Jesus once washed his face with water and then dried it with a cloth, leaving an image of his face imprinted on the cloth. This was sent by him to King ], who had sent a messenger asking Jesus to come and heal him of his disease. This image, called the ''Mandylion'' or ], appears in history in around 525. Numerous replicas of this "]" remain in circulation. There are also ] compositions of Jesus and Mary that are traditionally believed by many ] to have originated in paintings by ].

A currently familiar depiction is that on the ], whose records go back to 1353. Controversy surrounds the shroud and its exact origin remains subject to debate.<ref>William Meacham, ''The Authentication of the Turin Shroud: An Issue in Archaeological Epistemology'', Current Anthropology, Volume 24, No 3, June 1983</ref> The Shroud of Turin is respected by Christians of several traditions, including Baptists, Catholics, Lutherans, Methodists, Orthodox, Pentecostals, and Presbyterians.<ref>{{cite web|title=The Shroud of Turin: Its Ecumenical Implications|last=The Rev. Albert R. Dreisbach|year=1997|quote= Returning to the ecumenical dimension of this sacred linen, it became very evident to me on the night of August 16, 1983, when local judicatory leaders offered their corporate blessing to the TURIN SHROUD EXHIBIT and participated in the Evening Office of the Holy Shroud. The Greek Archbishop, the Roman Catholic Archbishop, the Episcopal Bishop and the Presiding Bishop of the AME Church gathered before the world's first full size, backlit transparency of the Shroud and joined clergy representing the Assemblies of God, Baptists, Lutherans, Methodists and Presbyterians in an amazing witness to ecumenical unity. At the conclusion of the service, His Grace Bishop John of the Greek Orthodox Diocese of Atlanta, turned to me and said: "Thank you very much for picking our day." I didn't fully understand the significance of his remark until he explained to me that August 16th is the Feast of the Holy Mandylion commemorating the occasion in 944 A.D. when the Shroud was first shown to the public in Byzantium following its arrival the previous day from Edessa in southeastern Turkey. }}</ref> It is one of the ]s approved by the Holy See, that to the ], now uses the image of the face on the shroud as it appeared in the negative of the photograph taken by amateur photographer ] in 1898.<ref>Joan Carroll Cruz, 1984, ''Relics'' OSV Press {{ISBN|0-87973-701-8}} p. 49</ref><ref name=Ball635>Ann Ball, 2003 ''Encyclopedia of Catholic Devotions and Practices'' {{ISBN|0-87973-910-X}} pp. 239, 635</ref> The image cannot be clearly seen on the shroud itself with the naked eye, and it surprised Pia to the extent that he said he almost dropped and broke the photographic plate when he first saw the developed negative image on it in the evening of 28 May 1898.<ref name=Ball635 />

Before 1898, devotion to the ] used an image based on the ], where legend recounts that Veronica from Jerusalem encountered Jesus along the ] on the way to ]. When she paused to wipe the sweat from Jesus's face with her veil, the image was imprinted on the cloth. The establishment of these images as ] traces back to Sister ] and the ] ] who started and promoted them from 1844 to 1874 in ] France, and Sister ] De Micheli who associated the image from the Shroud of Turin with the devotion in 1936 in ] Italy.
]ian icon from c. 1100 based on a Byzantine model]]

A very popular 20th-century depiction among Roman Catholics and Anglicans is the ],<ref name="Brockman2011">{{cite book|last=Brockman|first=Norbert|title=Encyclopedia of Sacred Places|date= 2011|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1-59884-654-6|page=140}}<!--|access-date=26 April 2014--></ref> which was approved by Pope ] in April 2000.<ref name="Drake85">Tim Drake, 2002, Saints of the Jubilee, {{ISBN|978-1-4033-1009-5}} pp. 85–95</ref> The Divine Mercy depiction is formally used in celebrations of ] and is venerated by over 100 million Catholics who follow the devotion.<ref name="With You Always' page 548" /> The image is not part of Acheiropoieta in that it has been depicted by modern artists, but the pattern of the image is said to have been miraculously shown to Saint ] in a vision of Jesus in 1931 in ], Poland.<ref name="Drake85" />

Faustina wrote in her diary that Jesus appeared to her and asked her to "Paint an image according to the pattern you see".<ref name="Drake85" /><ref name=Torretto84 /> Faustina eventually found an artist (]) to depict the Divine Mercy image of Jesus with his right hand raised in a sign of blessing and the left hand touching the garment near his breast, with two large rays, one red, the other white emanating from near his heart.<ref name=Torretto84>''A Divine Mercy Resource'' by Richard Torretto 2010 {{ISBN|1-4502-3236-1}} "The Image of Divine Mercy" pp. 84–107</ref><ref name=Odell63>Catherine M. Odell, 1998, Faustina: Apostle of Divine Mercy OSV Press {{ISBN|978-0-87973-923-2}} pp. 63–64</ref> After Faustina's death, a number of other artists painted the image, with the depiction by ] being among the most reproduced.<ref>''Butler's lives of the saints: the third millennium'' by Paul Burns, Alban Butler 2001 {{ISBN|978-0-86012-383-5}} p. 252</ref>

] stated that '']'' was the result of a "miraculous vision that he received late one night", proclaiming that "the answer came at 2 A.M., January 1924" as "a vision in response to my prayer to God in a despairing situation."<ref name="Morgan1996">{{cite book|last=Morgan|first=David|title=Icons of American Protestantism: The Art of Warner Sallman|year=1996|publisher=Yale University Press|isbn=978-0-300-06342-4|page=62|quote=Sallman always insisted that his initial sketch of Jesus was the result of spiritual "picturization," a miraculous vision that he received late one night. "The answer came at 2 A.M., January 1924," he wrote. "It came as a vision in response to my prayer to God in a despairing situation." The situation was a deadline: Sallman had been commissioned to paint the February cover for the ''Covenant Companion'', the monthly magazine of the Evangelical Covenant Church, and he had artist's block for weeks. The February issue was focusing on Christian youth, and Sallman's assignment was to provide an inspirational image of Christ that would "challenge our young people." "I mused over it for a long time in prayer and meditation," Sallman recalled, "seeking for something which would catch the eye and convey the message of the Christian gospel on the cover."}}<!--|access-date=30 April 2014--></ref> The ''Head of Christ'' is venerated in the ],<ref>{{cite journal|date=Fall 1997|journal=Coptic Church Review|volume=18|issue=3|title=Theological Issues of the Coptic Orthodox Inculturation in Western Society|author=Otto F.A. Meinardus, Ph.D.|issn=0273-3269|quote=An interesting case of inculturation occurred on Monday, November 11, 1991 when the 12-year-old Isaac Ayoub of Houston, Texas, suffering from leukemia, saw that the eyes of Jesus in the famous Sallman ''Head of Christ'' began moving and shedding an oily liquid like tears. On the same day, Fr. Ishaq Soliman, the Coptic priest of St. Mark’s Coptic Church in Houston, testified to the miracles. On the following day, Dr. Atef Rizkalla, the family physician, examined the youth and certified that there were no traces of leukemia. Sallman’s ''Head of Christ'' was exhibited in the Coptic Church and more than 50,000 people visited the church. Two Coptic bishops, Anbâ Tadros of Port Said and Anbâ Yuhanna of Cairo verified the story.}}</ref> after twelve-year-old Isaac Ayoub, who diagnosed with cancer, saw the eyes of ] in the painting shedding tears; Fr. Ishaq Soliman of St. Mark's Coptic Church in Houston, on the same day, "testified to the miracles" and on the next day, "Dr. Atef Rizkalla, the family physician, examined the youth and certified that there were no traces of ]".<ref name="Meinardus2006" />

With episcopal approval from Bishop Tadros of Port Said and Bishop Yuhanna of Cairo, "Sallman's ''Head of Christ'' was exhibited in the Coptic Church", with "more than fifty thousand people" visiting the church to see it.<ref name="Meinardus2006">{{cite book|last=Meinardus|first=Otto F. A.|title=Christians In Egypt: Orthodox, Catholic, and Protestant Communities – Past and Present|date=2006|publisher=American University in Cairo Press|isbn=978-1-61797-262-1|page=70|quote=An interesting case of inculturation took place on Monday, November 11, 1991 when the twelve-year-old Isaac Ayoub of Houston, Texas, suffering from leukemia, saw that the eyes of Jesus in the famous Sallman "Head of Christ" began moving and shedding an oily liquid like tears. On the same day, Father Ishaq Soliman, the Coptic priest of St. Mark's Coptic Church in Houston, testified to the miracles. On the following day, Dr. Atef Rizkalla, the family physician, examined the youth and certified that there were no traces of leukemia. Sallman's ''Head of Christ'' was exhibited in the Coptic Church and more than fifty thousand people visited the church. Two Coptic bishops, Bishop Tadros of Port Said and Bishop Yuhanna of Cairo, verified the story.}}<!--|access-date=28 April 2014--></ref> In addition, several ] have explained the "power of Sallman's picture" by documenting occurrences such as ] letting go of a businessman and fleeing after seeing the image, a "thief who aborted his misdeed when he saw the ''Head of Christ'' on a living room wall", and ] of non-believers to Christianity.<ref name="Morgan96">{{cite book|last=Morgan|first=David|title=The Art of Warner Sallman|year=1996|publisher=Yale University Press|isbn=978-0-300-06342-4|page=192|quote=Articles published in popular religious magazines during this time gathered together in an obviously didactic way several anecdotes concerning the power of Sallman's picture among nonwhites, non-Christians, and those exhibiting unacceptable behavior. We read of a white businessman, for instance, in a remote jungle, assaulted by a vicious group of headhunters who demand that he remove his clothes. In going through his billfold, they discover a small reproduction of Sallman's Christ, quickly apologize, then vanish "into the jungle without inflicting further harm." A second article relates the story of the thief who aborted his misdeed when he saw the ''Head of Christ'' on a living room wall. Another tells of the conversion of a Jewish woman on her deathbed, when a hospital chaplain shows her Sallman's picture.}}<!--|access-date=1 May 2014--></ref> As an extraordinarily successful work of ],<ref name="Lippy1994">{{cite book|last=Lippy|first=Charles H.|title=Being Religious, American Style: A History of Popular Religiosity in the United States|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3yB1R5485dUC&pg=PA185|access-date=30 April 2014|date=1994|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group|isbn=978-0-313-27895-2|page=185|quote=Of these one stands out as having deeply impressed itself of the American religious consciousness: the ''Head of Christ'' by artist Warner Sallman (1892–1968). Originally sketched in charcoal as a cover illustration for the ''Covenant Companion'', the magazine of the Swedish Evangelical Mission Covenant of America denomination, and based on an image of Jesus in a painting by the French artist Leon Augustin Lhermitte, Sallman's ''Head of Christ'' was painted in 1940. In half a century, it had been produced more than five hundred million times in formats ranging from large-scale copies for use in churches to wallet-sized ones that individuals could carry with them at all times.}}</ref> it had been reproduced over half a billion times worldwide by the end of the 20th century.<ref name="BlumHarvey2012">{{cite book|last1=Blum|first1=Edward J.|last2=Harvey|first2=Paul|title=Color of Christ|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TPSB1QZkFU0C&pg=PA211|access-date=30 April 2014|date=2012|publisher=UNC Press Books|isbn=978-0-8078-3737-5|page=211|quote=By the 1990s, Sallman's Head of Christ had been printed more than 500 million times and had achieved global iconic status.}}</ref>

== Examples ==
<gallery> <gallery>
File:ChristAsSol.jpg|A representation of Jesus as ]. Mosaic of the 3rd century on the ] under ].
Image:Good shepherd 02b close.jpg|Jesus as the ]. Ceiling of S. Callisto catacomb, mid ].
File:Syriac miniature of Christ.jpg|Christ holding ], miniature in Syriac manuscript DIYR 339, a 6th-century gospel book from ]
Image:ChristAsSol.jpg|A representation of Jesus as the sun-god ]/] riding in his chariot. Mosaic of the ] on the ''Vatican grottoes'' under ].
File:Solidus-Justinian II-Christ b-sb1413.jpg|Jesus depicted on an early 8th-century Byzantine coin. After the ] all coins had Christ on them.
Image:Christ with beard.jpg|Mural painting from the ]. One of the first bearded images of Jesus, late ].
File:Restored Mogao Christian painting 3.jpg|Restored ] ], 9th century
Image:Solidus-Justinian II-Christ b-sb1413.jpg|Jesus depicted on an early ] Byzantine coin. After the ] all coins had Christ on them.
File:Edgar from Winchester Charter.png|A beardless Christ in the ] New Minster Charter, ], mid-10th century
Image:Christ pantocrator daphne1090-1100.jpg|] ] with the ] in a ] form, used throughout the ]. Characteristically, he is portrayed as similar in features and skin tone to the culture of the artist.
File:Jesus Image on a Manichaean Temple Banner.jpg|Reconstruction of the enthroned Jesus ({{transliteration|pal|Yišō}}) image on a Manichaean temple banner from c. 10th-century ] (East Central Asia)
Image:AberdeenBestiaryFolio004vChristInMajesty.jpg|] from an ], 12th century.
File:Christ pantocrator daphne1090-1100.jpg|11th-century ] with the ] in a ] form, used throughout the ]. Characteristically, he is portrayed as similar in features and skin tone to the culture of the artist.
Image:Jesus Coat of Arms 1.jpg|An unusual image of Jesus as a medieval knight bearing an attributed ] based on the ]
File:Christ All Mercy (13 c.).jpg|"Christ All Mercy" Eastern Orthodox icon
Image:Baptism-christ.jpg|''The Baptism of Christ'', by ], ].
File:Jesus as a Manichaean Prophet, 13th century.jpg|'']'', a 12th- or 13th-century Chinese hanging scroll depicting Jesus Christ as the ] prophet ]
Image:Andrea Mantegna 035.jpg|Christ as ] by ]
Image:Christ Carrying the Cross 1580.jpg|Christ Carrying the Cross, 1580, by ] File:Jesus-Christ-from-Hagia-Sophia.jpg|Jesus Christ ] 13th-century ] from ]
File:Jesus Coat of Arms 1.jpg|An unusual 15th-century image of Jesus as a medieval knight bearing an ] ] based on the ]
Image:Ethiopia_African_potrayal_of_Jesus.JPG|An traditional ] depiction of Jesus and Mary with distinctively "Ethiopian" features.
File:Piero, battesimo di cristo 04.jpg|'']'', by ], c. 1448-1450
Image:Jesus and the doctors of the Faith dsc01783.jpg|Jesus, aged 12, teaching the doctors of the Faith, painted by ].
File:Cima da Conegliano, Christus. Dresda.jpg|Portrait of Jesus by ] (1459–1517)
Image:ChineseJesus.jpg|A ] depiction of Jesus and the rich man, from Mark chapter 10.
File:Pietro Perugino 040.jpg|]'s depiction of the ] as '']'', 1482
Image:PortAuPrinceMural.jpg|A mural depicting the baptism of Jesus in a typical Haitian rural scenery, Cathédrale de Sainte Trinité, ], ].
File:Kristus som den lidende frelser.jpg|'']'', c. 1488–1500, by ]
Image:Jesus Christ - Sacred Heart.jpg|Depiction of Jesus and His Most Sacred Heart
File:Nestorian Evangelion (Folio 4v).jpg|A ] "Crucifixion of Jesus", illustration from the '']'', 16th century
Image:Divine Mercy (Adolf Hyla painting)2007-08-16.jpg|] painting by Adolf Hyla (1943).The polish writing at the bottom means "Jesus I trust in you"
File:SAAM-1956.11.21 1.jpg|Palma il Vecchio, Head of Christ, 16th century, Italy
File:Michelangelo, Giudizio Universale 03.jpg|Mary and Christ, in ] by ] (1541). This depiction was much criticised.
File:Titian 1558 Ancona Crucifixion.jpg|The ] of Christ, 1558, by ]
File:Transfiguration by Lodovico Carracci.jpg|'']'' depicting him with ], ] and three apostles by ], 1594
File:Follower of Ribera - Christ among the Doctors.jpg|Jesus, aged 12, ''Jesus among the Doctors (as a child debating in the temple)'', 1630 by ]
File:Noel-coypel-the-resurrection-of-christ-1700.jpg|] by ], 1700, using a ] of Jesus
File:Trevisani baptism christ.JPG|]'s depiction of the typical baptismal scene with the sky opening and the ] descending as a dove, 1723
File:Christ, the Pantocrator.jpg|19th-century Russian icon of Christ Pantocrator
File:Ethiopia African potrayal of Jesus.JPG|A traditional ] depiction of Jesus and Mary with distinctively Ethiopian features
File:Enrique Simonet - Cabeza de Jesús.jpg|''Head of Jesus'' (1890) by ]
File:Christ Pantocrator, Church of the Holy Sepulchre.png|] mosaic in the dome above the ] of the ] in Jerusalem
Alwan Codex 28 Ethiopian Biblical Manuscript (a).jpg|] as depicted in the Ethiopian Alwan Codex, 20th century
File:Jesus by Georg Hansen.jpg|Jesus Christ as painted in the {{ill|Hässleholms kyrka|sv|lt=Church}} of ], Sweden, by the painter Georg Hansen (1868-1932)
File:StJohnsAshfield StainedGlass GoodShepherd-frame crop.jpg|Jesus as ] (1932) in ] at ]
File:PortAuPrinceMural.jpg|A mural (1951) depicting the ] in a typical Haitian rural scenery, ], ], Haiti
File:Touchdown Jesus at Notre Dame.jpg|The '']'' (1964) mural on the side of the ] at the ]
File:SantuariodeSanJosejf0188 14.JPG|Depiction of Jesus at the '']'' in Mandaluyong, Philippines

</gallery> </gallery>


===Sculpture=== === Sculpture ===
{{main|List of statues of Jesus}}
<gallery> <gallery>
File:SalvadorDelMundo.jpg|] is an iconic landmark that represents ] city. It symbolizes the ] standing on top of Earth as the savior of the world
Image:Chartres2006 092.jpg|], ]
File:CristoreiPortugal.jpg|] in ]
Image:Michelangelo's Pieta 5450 cropncleaned.jpg|]'s '']'' shows Mary holding the dead body of Jesus.
File:Christ the Redeemer - Cristo Redentor.jpg|], the most famous icon in ], ]
Image:Cristo de la Concordia 02.jpg|''Cristo de la Concordia'' in ] is the largest statue of Jesus ever made.
File:Chartres2006 092.jpg|'']'', ]
Image:Cristo del Otero (Palencia).jpg|''Cristo del Otero'', above ], Spain
File:Michelangelo's Pieta 5450 cropncleaned.jpg|]'s '']'', 1498–99, shows Mary holding the dead body of Jesus
Image:Statua lignea di Gesu ad Oropa.jpg|Statue at ], ]
File:Cristo de la Concordia 02.jpg|'']'' in ], claimed to be the largest statue of Jesus ever made
Image:Cristo Redentor de los Andes.jpg|4 ton bronze statue of Jesus placed high in the Andes mountains, on a road between Chile and Argentina.
File:Cristo del Otero (Palencia).jpg|'']'', above ], Spain
Image:Thorvaldsen Christus.jpg|]'s ''Christus'', ], ]
File:Thorvaldsen Christus.jpg|]'s '']'', ], Copenhagen
Image:Infant Jesus of Prague.jpg|], one of several miniature statues of an infant Christ that are much venerated by the faithful.
File:Infant Jesus of Prague.jpg|], one of several miniature statues of an infant Christ that are much venerated by the faithful
File:Lux Mundi, the sculpture of Jesus at Solid Rock Church.jpg|'']'', a statue of Jesus by ] completed in 2012<ref name=WCPO>{{cite news|work=WCPO|title=Construction progressing on new Jesus statue along I-75|date=15 June 2012|url=http://www.wcpo.com/dpp/news/region_north_cincinnati/monroe/Construction-to-begin-on-new-Jesus-statue-along-I-75#ixzz1y1CWlU3h|access-date=7 September 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130629192543/http://www.wcpo.com/dpp/news/region_north_cincinnati/monroe/Construction-to-begin-on-new-Jesus-statue-along-I-75#ixzz1y1CWlU3h|archive-date=29 June 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref>
File:Christ the Good Shepherd, Church of the Good Shepherd (Rosemont, Pennsylvania).jpg|The ] as the ], ]
File:Cristo Negro (Black Christ) - Iglesia de San Felipe (01).jpg|The '']'', at the '']'', Portobelo, Panama.
File:Bolestný Kristus (poč. 16. stol.), Cheb.jpg|16th century {{ill|Bolestný Kristus z Chebu|cs|lt=sculpture of suffering Christ}}, ], Czechia.
</gallery> </gallery>


==See also== == See also ==
* ]

* ]
*]
*] * ]
*] * ]
*] * ]
* ]
*]
* ]
*]
* ]
*]
* ]
*]
*] * ]
*] * ]
*] * ]
* ]


==References== == Notes ==
{{Reflist|30em}}
<references/>


==External links== == References ==
* ] and Maciej Jan Jasiński, '''', in ''Church, Communication and Culture'' 9 (2024), pp.&nbsp;1–36. DOI: 10.1080/23753234.2024.2322546.
*
* Cartlidge, David R., and Elliott, J. K. ''Art and the Christian Apocrypha'', Routledge, 2001, {{ISBN|978-0-415-23392-7}},
* at monasteryicons.com
* Every, George. Christian Mythology, Hamlyn 1988 (1970 1st edn.) {{ISBN|0-600-34290-5}}
* December 2005
* Grabar, André. ''Christian iconography: a study of its origins'', Taylor & Francis, 1968, {{ISBN|978-0-7100-0605-9}}
* Grigg, Robert. "Byzantine Credulity as an Impediment to Antiquarianism", ''Gesta'', Vol. 26, No. 1 (1987), pp.&nbsp;3–9, The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the International Center of Medieval Art,
* James Hall. ''A History of Ideas and Images in Italian Art'', 1983, John Murray, London, {{ISBN|0-7195-3971-4}}
* Hellemo, Geir. ''''. Brill; 1989. {{ISBN|978-90-04-08836-8}}.
* Schiller, Gertrud. ''Iconography of Christian Art, Vol. I'', 1971 (English trans from German), Lund Humphries, London, {{ISBN|0-85331-270-2}}
* Syndicus, Eduard. Early Christian Art; Burns & Oates, London, 1962
* ], Byzantine Art, 3rd edn 1968, Penguin Books Ltd
* Zanker, Paul. ]. ''The Mask of Socrates, The Image of the Intellectual in Antiquity'', University of California Press, 1995


== External links ==
* , most dating to his lifetime: includes color paintings found in Ajanta Caves.
{{Commons category|Iconography of Jesus Christ}}
*
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120304220324/http://www.shroudstory.com/art.htm |date=4 March 2012 }} December 2005
* Visual comparison and analysis
* *
*
* Warner Sallman's Head of Christ: An American Icon
*


{{Jesus footer}}
]
{{Christianity footer}}
]
{{Life of Jesus in Christian art}}
{{Religion and philosophy in popular culture}}
{{Authority control}}


]
]
]
]
] ]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 17:57, 15 December 2024

Christian icons or images depicting Jesus

A mural painting from the catacomb of Commodilla. One of the first bearded images of Jesus, late 4th century.
Part of a series on
Jesus
Jesus in Christianity
Jesus in Islam
Background
Jesus in history
Perspectives on Jesus
Jesus in culture

The depiction of Jesus in pictorial form dates back to early Christian art and architecture, as aniconism in Christianity was rejected within the ante-Nicene period. It took several centuries to reach a conventional standardized form for his physical appearance, which has subsequently remained largely stable since that time. Most images of Jesus have in common a number of traits which are now almost universally associated with Jesus, although variants are seen.

The conventional image of a fully bearded Jesus with long hair emerged around AD 300, but did not become established until the 6th century in Eastern Christianity, and much later in the West. It has always had the advantage of being easily recognizable, and distinguishing Jesus from other figures shown around him, which the use of a cruciform halo also achieves. Earlier images were much more varied.

Images of Jesus tend to show ethnic characteristics similar to those of the culture in which the image has been created. Beliefs that certain images are historically authentic, or have acquired an authoritative status from Church tradition, remain powerful among some of the faithful, in Eastern Orthodoxy, Lutheranism, Anglicanism, and Roman Catholicism. The Shroud of Turin is now the best-known example, though the Image of Edessa and the Veil of Veronica were better known in medieval times.

The representation of Jesus was controversial in the early period; the regional Synod of Elvira in Spain in 306 states in its 36th canon that no images should be in churches. Later, in the Eastern church, Byzantine iconoclasm banned and destroyed images of Christ for a period, before they returned in full strength. In the 16th-century Protestant Reformation, the followers of John Calvin in particular saw images of Christ as idolatrous and enforced their removal. Due to their understanding of the second of the Ten Commandments, most Evangelical Protestants still avoid displaying representations of Jesus in their places of worship.

Early Christianity

Before Constantine

Incised sarcophagus slab with the Adoration of the Magi from the Catacombs of Rome, 3rd century. Plaster cast with added colour.

Except for Jesus wearing tzitzit—the tassels on a tallit—in Matthew 14:36 and Luke 8:43–44, there is no physical description of Jesus contained in any of the canonical Gospels. In the Acts of the Apostles, Jesus is said to have manifested as a "light from heaven" that temporarily blinded the Apostle Paul, but no specific form is given. In the Book of Revelation there is a vision the author had of "someone like a Son of Man" in spirit form: "dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest. The hair on his head were white like wool, and his eyes were like blazing fire. His feet were like burnt bronze glowing in a furnace (...) His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance" (Revelation 1:12–16, NIV). Use in art of the Revelation description of Jesus has generally been restricted to illustrations of the book itself, and nothing in the scripture confirms the spiritual form's resemblance to the physical form Jesus took in his life on Earth.

In the first-century AD, many Jews understood Exodus 20:4–6 ("Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image") as a proscription against any depiction of humans or animals. Consequently, no figure art was produced for, or by, the Jewish communities in Judea and Galilee during Jesus' lifetime, or in the decades that followed. But attitudes towards the interpretation of this Commandment changed through the centuries, and by the third century, some Jewish communities were producing figure art. The frescos decorating the interior of Dura-Europos synagogue (c. 240 AD) depict many scenes from the Tanakh. They are the earliest-known examples of Jewish figure art.

During the persecution of Christians under the Roman Empire, Christian art was necessarily furtive and ambiguous, and there was hostility to idols in a group still with a large component of members with Jewish origins, surrounded by, and polemicising against, sophisticated pagan images of gods. Irenaeus (d. c. 202), Clement of Alexandria (d. 215), Lactantius (c. 240–c. 320) and Eusebius of Caesarea (d. c. 339) disapproved of portrayals in images of Jesus. The 36th canon of the non-ecumenical Synod of Elvira in 306 AD reads, "It has been decreed that no pictures be had in the churches, and that which is worshipped or adored be not painted on the walls", which has been interpreted by John Calvin and other Protestants as an interdiction of the making of images of Christ. The issue remained the subject of controversy until the end of the 4th century.

The earliest surviving Christian art comes from the late 2nd to early 4th centuries on the walls of tombs belonging, most likely, to wealthy Christians in the catacombs of Rome, although from literary evidence there may well have been panel icons which, like almost all classical painting, have disappeared.

The Healing of the Paralytic – one of the oldest known depictions of Jesus, from the Syrian city of Dura Europos, dating from about 235

Initially Jesus was represented indirectly by pictogram symbols such as the ichthys (fish), the peacock, or an anchor (the Labarum or Chi-Rho was a later development). The staurogram seems to have been a very early representation of the crucified Jesus within the sacred texts. Later personified symbols were used, including Jonah, whose three days in the belly of the whale pre-figured the interval between Christ's death and resurrection; Daniel in the lion's den; or Orpheus charming the animals. The image of "The Good Shepherd", a beardless youth in pastoral scenes collecting sheep, was the most common of these images, and was probably not understood as a portrait of the historical Jesus at this period. It continues the classical Kriophoros ("ram-bearer" figure), and in some cases may also represent the Shepherd of Hermas, a popular Christian literary work of the 2nd century.

Among the earliest depictions clearly intended to directly represent Jesus himself are many showing him as a baby, usually held by his mother, especially in the Adoration of the Magi, seen as the first theophany, or display of the incarnate Christ to the world at large. The oldest known portrait of Jesus, found in Syria and dated to about 235, shows him as a beardless young man of authoritative and dignified bearing. He is depicted with close-cropped hair and wearing a tunic and pallium—the common male dress for much of Greco-Roman society, and similar to that found in the figure art in the Dura-Europos Synagogue.

The appearance of Jesus had some theological implications. While some Christians thought Jesus should have the beautiful appearance of a young classical hero, and the Gnostics tended to think he could change his appearance at will, for which they cited the Meeting at Emmaus as evidence, others including the Church Fathers Justin (d. 165) and Tertullian (d. 220) believed, following Isaiah 53:2, that Christ's appearance was unremarkable: "he had no form nor comeliness, that we should look upon him, nor beauty that we should delight in him." But when the pagan Celsus ridiculed the Christian religion for having an ugly God in about 180, Origen (d. 248) cited Psalm 45:3: "Gird thy sword upon thy thigh, mighty one, with thy beauty and fairness" Later the emphasis of leading Christian thinkers changed; Jerome (d. 420) and Augustine of Hippo (d. 430) argued that Jesus must have been ideally beautiful in face and body. For Augustine he was "beautiful as a child, beautiful on earth, beautiful in heaven."

Bearded Jesus between Peter and Paul, Catacombs of Marcellinus and Peter, Rome. Second half of the 4th century. Such works "first present us with the fully formed image of Christ in Majesty that will so dominate Byzantine art." For detail of Christ, see this file.
Christ Pantocrator in a Roman mosaic in the church of Santa Pudenziana, Rome, c. 400–410 AD during the Western Roman Empire

From the 3rd century onwards, the first narrative scenes from the Life of Christ to be clearly seen are the Baptism of Christ, painted in a catacomb in about 200, and the miracle of the Raising of Lazarus, both of which can be clearly identified by the inclusion of the dove of the Holy Spirit in Baptisms, and the vertical, shroud-wrapped body of Lazarus. Other scenes remain ambiguous—an agape feast may be intended as a Last Supper, but before the development of a recognised physical appearance for Christ, and attributes such as the halo, it is impossible to tell, as tituli or captions are rarely used. There are some surviving scenes from Christ's Works of about 235 from the Dura Europos church on the Persian frontier of the Empire. During the 4th century a much greater number of scenes came to be depicted, usually showing Christ as youthful, beardless and with short hair that does not reach his shoulders, although there is considerable variation.

The oldest surviving panel icon of Christ Pantocrator, encaustic on panel, c. 6th century, showing the appearance of Jesus that is still immediately recognised today.

Jesus is sometimes shown performing miracles by means of a wand, as on the doors of Santa Sabina in Rome (430–32). He uses the wand to change water to wine, multiply the bread and fishes, and raise Lazarus. When pictured healing, he only lays on hands. The wand is thought to be a symbol of power. The bare-faced youth with the wand may indicate that Jesus was thought of as a user of magic or wonder worker by some of the early Christians. No art has been found picturing Jesus with a wand before the 2nd century. Some scholars suggest that the Gospel of Mark, the Secret Gospel of Mark and the Gospel of John (the so-called Signs Gospel), portray such a wonder worker, user of magic, a magician or a Divine man. Only the Apostle Peter is also depicted in ancient art with a wand. Research by Lee M. Jefferson however, argued that the depiction of Jesus holding a wand is not an attempt to portray Jesus as a magician or magic user, but rather a continuity of biblical tradition of Moses's staff. It is also argued that early Christians were strong in their rejection of magic and anything related to it.

Another depiction, seen from the late 3rd century or early 4th century onwards, showed Jesus with a beard, and within a few decades can be very close to the conventional type that later emerged. This depiction has been said to draw variously on Imperial imagery, the type of the classical philosopher, and that of Zeus, leader of the Greek gods, or Jupiter, his Roman equivalent, and the protector of Rome. According to art historian Paul Zanker, the bearded type has long hair from the start, and a relatively long beard (contrasting with the short "classical" beard and hair always given to St Peter, and most other apostles); this depiction is specifically associated with "Charismatic" philosophers like Euphrates the Stoic, Dio of Prusa and Apollonius of Tyana, some of whom were claimed to perform miracles.

After the very earliest examples of c. 300, this depiction is mostly used for hieratic images of Jesus, and scenes from his life are more likely to use a beardless, youthful type. The tendency of older scholars such as Talbot Rice to see the beardless Jesus as associated with a "classical" artistic style and the bearded one as representing an "Eastern" one drawing from ancient Syria, Mesopotamia and Persia seems impossible to sustain, and does not feature in more recent analyses. Equally attempts to relate on a consistent basis the explanation for the type chosen in a particular work to the differing theological views of the time have been unsuccessful. From the 3rd century on, some Christian leaders, such as Clement of Alexandria, had recommended the wearing of beards by Christian men. The centre parting was also seen from early on, and was also associated with long-haired philosophers.

Christ as Emperor, wearing military dress, and crushing the serpent representing Satan. "I am the way and the truth and the life" (John 14:6) reads the inscription. Ravenna, after 500

After Constantine

From the middle of the 4th century, after Christianity was legalized by the Edict of Milan in 313, and gained Imperial favour, there was a new range of images of Christ the King, using either of the two physical types described above, but adopting the costume and often the poses of Imperial iconography. These developed into the various forms of Christ in Majesty. Some scholars reject the connection between the political events and developments in iconography, seeing the change as a purely theological one, resulting from the shift of the concept and title of Pantocrator ("Ruler of all") from God the Father (still not portrayed in art) to Christ, which was a development of the same period, perhaps led by Athanasius of Alexandria (d. 373).

Another depiction drew from classical images of philosophers, often shown as a youthful "intellectual wunderkind" in Roman sarcophagii; the Traditio Legis image initially uses this type. Gradually Jesus became shown as older, and during the 5th century the image with a beard and long hair, now with a cruciform halo, came to dominate, especially in the Eastern Empire. In the earliest large New Testament mosaic cycle, in Sant'Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna (c. 520), Jesus is beardless through the period of his ministry until the scenes of the Passion, after which he is shown with a beard.

The Good Shepherd, now clearly identified as Christ, with halo and often rich robes, is still depicted, as on the apse mosaic in the church of Santi Cosma e Damiano in Rome, where the twelve apostles are depicted as twelve sheep below the imperial Jesus, or in the Mausoleum of Galla Placidia at Ravenna.

Once the bearded, long-haired Jesus became the conventional representation of Jesus, his facial features slowly began to be standardised, although this process took until at least the 6th century in the Eastern Church, and much longer in the West, where clean-shaven Jesuses are common until the 12th century, despite the influence of Byzantine art. But by the late Middle Ages the beard became almost universal and when Michelangelo showed a clean-shaven Apollo-like Christ in his Last Judgment fresco in the Sistine Chapel (1534–41) he came under persistent attack in the Counter-Reformation climate of Rome for this, as well as other things.

French scholar Paul Vignon has listed fifteen similarities, or "marks," between most of the icons of Jesus after this point, particularly in the icons of "Christ Pantocrator" ("The all-powerful Messiah"). He claims that these are due to the availability of the Image of Edessa (which he claims to be identical to the Shroud of Turin) to the artists, via Constantinople. Certainly images believed to have miraculous origins, or the Hodegetria, believed to be a portrait of Mary from the life by Saint Luke, were widely regarded as authoritative by the Early Medieval period and greatly influenced depictions. In Eastern Orthodoxy the form of images was, and largely is, regarded as revealed truth, with a status almost equal to scripture, and the aim of artists is to copy earlier images without originality, although the style and content of images does in fact change slightly over time.

As to the historical appearance of Jesus, in one possible translation of the apostle Paul's First Epistle to the Corinthians, Paul urges Christian men of first-century Corinth not to have long hair. An early commentary by Pelagius (c. AD 354 – c. AD 420/440) says, "Paul was complaining because men were fussing about their hair and women were flaunting their locks in church. Not only was this dishonoring to them, but it was also an incitement to fornication." Some have speculated that Jesus and/or Paul were Nazirites, a temporary vow during which hair is not cut. Critics emphasize that at the time, long hair on men was considered shameful as Paul states in I Corinthians 11:14. Jesus was a practicing Jew so presumably had a beard.

Later periods

Christ in Majesty, still with no beard, from an English 12th-century illuminated manuscript.

By the 5th century depictions of the Passion began to appear, perhaps reflecting a change in the theological focus of the early Church. The 6th-century Rabbula Gospels includes some of the earliest surviving images of the crucifixion and resurrection. By the 6th century the bearded depiction of Jesus had become standard in the East, though the West, especially in northern Europe, continued to mix bearded and unbearded depictions for several centuries. The depiction with a longish face, long straight brown hair parted in the middle, and almond shaped eyes shows consistency from the 6th century to the present. Various legends developed which were believed to authenticate the historical accuracy of the standard depiction, such as the image of Edessa and later the Veil of Veronica.

Partly to aid recognition of the scenes, narrative depictions of the Life of Christ focused increasingly on the events celebrated in the major feasts of the church calendar, and the events of the Passion, neglecting the miracles and other events of Jesus' public ministry, except for the raising of Lazarus, where the mummy-like wrapped body was shown standing upright, giving an unmistakable visual signature. A cruciform halo was worn only by Jesus (and the other persons of the Trinity), while plain halos distinguished Mary, the Apostles and other saints, helping the viewer to read increasingly populated scenes.

The period of Byzantine Iconoclasm acted as a barrier to developments in the East, but by the 9th century art was permitted again. The Transfiguration of Jesus was a major theme in the East and every Eastern Orthodox monk who had trained in icon painting had to prove his craft by painting an icon of the Transfiguration. However, while Western depictions increasingly aimed at realism, in Eastern icons a low regard for perspective and alterations in the size and proportion of an image aim to reach beyond earthly reality to a spiritual meaning.

The 13th century witnessed a turning point in the portrayal of the powerful Kyrios image of Jesus as a wonder worker in the West, as the Franciscans began to emphasize the humility of Jesus both at his birth and his death via the nativity scene as well as the crucifixion. The Franciscans approached both ends of this spectrum of emotions and as the joys of the Nativity of were added to the agony of crucifixion a whole new range of emotions were ushered in, with wide-ranging cultural impact on the image of Jesus for centuries thereafter.

Christ Carrying the Cross, 1580, by El Greco, whose art reflects both his roots in Greek Orthodox traditions and the Catholic Counter-Reformation

After Giotto, Fra Angelico and others systematically developed uncluttered images that focused on the depiction of Jesus with an ideal human beauty, in works like Leonardo da Vinci's Last Supper, arguably the first High Renaissance painting. Images of Jesus now drew on classical sculpture, at least in some of their poses. However Michelangelo was considered to have gone much too far in his beardless Christ in his The Last Judgment fresco in the Sistine Chapel, which very clearly adapted classical sculptures of Apollo, and this path was rarely followed by other artists.

The High Renaissance was contemporary with the start of the Protestant Reformation which, especially in its first decades, violently objected to almost all public religious images as idolatrous, and vast numbers were destroyed. Gradually images of Jesus became acceptable to most Protestants in various contexts, especially in narrative contexts, as book illustrations and prints, and later in larger paintings. Protestant art continued the now-standard depiction of the physical appearance of Jesus. Meanwhile, the Catholic Counter-Reformation re-affirmed the importance of art in assisting the devotions of the faithful, and encouraged the production of new images of or including Jesus in enormous numbers, also continuing to use the standard depiction.

During the 17th century, some writers, such as Thomas Browne in his Pseudodoxia Epidemica criticized depictions of Jesus with long hair. Although some scholars believed that Jesus wore long hair because he was a Nazarite and therefore could not cut his hair, Browne argues "that our Saviour was a Nazarite after this kind, we have no reason to determine; for he drank Wine, and was therefore called by the Pharisees, a Wine-bibber; he approached also the dead, as when he raised from death Lazarus, and the daughter of Jairus.”

By the end of the 19th century, new reports of miraculous images of Jesus had appeared and continue to receive significant attention, e.g. Secondo Pia's 1898 photograph of the Shroud of Turin, one of the most controversial artifacts in history, which during its May 2010 exposition it was visited by over 2 million people. Another 20th-century depiction of Jesus, namely the Divine Mercy image based on Faustina Kowalska's reported vision has over 100 million followers. The first cinematic portrayal of Jesus was in the 1897 film La Passion du Christ produced in Paris, which lasted 5 minutes. Thereafter cinematic portrayals have continued to show Jesus with a beard in the standard western depiction that resembles traditional images.

A scene from the documentary film Super Size Me showed American children being unable to identify a common depiction of Jesus, despite recognizing other figures like George Washington and Ronald McDonald.

Conventional depictions

Conventional depictions of Christ developed in medieval art include the narrative scenes of the Life of Christ, and many other conventional depictions:

Common narrative scenes from the Life of Christ in art include:

Devotional images include:

Range of depictions

See also: God the Father in Western art
An 18th-century Ethiopian image of Jesus

Certain local traditions have maintained different depictions, sometimes reflecting local racial characteristics, as do the Catholic and Orthodox depictions. The Coptic Church of Egypt separated in the 5th century, and has a distinctive depiction of Jesus, consistent with Coptic art. The Ethiopian Church, also Coptic, developed on Coptic traditions, but shows Jesus and all Biblical figures with the Ethiopian appearance of its members. Other traditions in China, Central Asia and elsewhere generally depict the appearance of Jesus as that of the local population (see the gallery below).

In modern times such variation has become more common, but images following the traditional depiction in both physical appearance and clothing are still dominant, perhaps surprisingly so. In Europe, local ethnic tendencies in depictions of Jesus can be seen, for example in Spanish, German, or Early Netherlandish painting, but almost always surrounding figures are still more strongly characterised. For example, the Virgin Mary, after the vision reported by Bridget of Sweden, was often shown with blonde hair, but Christ's is very rarely paler than a light brown.

Some medieval Western depictions, usually of the Meeting at Emmaus, where his disciples do not recognise him at first (Luke.24.13–32), showed Jesus wearing a Jewish hat.

The CGI model created in 2001 depicted Jesus' skin color as being darker and more olive-colored than his traditional depictions in Western art.

In 2001, the television series Son of God used one of three first-century Jewish skulls from a leading department of forensic science in Israel to depict Jesus in a new way. A face was constructed using forensic anthropology by Richard Neave, a retired medical artist from the Unit of Art in Medicine at the University of Manchester. The face that Neave constructed suggested that Jesus would have had a broad face and large nose, and differed significantly from the traditional depictions of Jesus in renaissance art. Additional information about Jesus' skin color and hair was provided by Mark Goodacre, a New Testament scholar and professor at Duke University.

Using third-century images from a synagogue—the earliest pictures of Jewish people—Goodacre proposed that Jesus' skin color would have been darker and swarthier than his traditional Western image. He also suggested that he would have had short, curly hair and a short cropped beard. Although entirely speculative as the face of Jesus, the result of the study determined that Jesus' skin would have been more olive-colored than white or black, and that he would have looked like a typical Galilean Semite. Among the points made was that the Bible records that Jesus's disciple Judas had to point him out to those arresting him in Gethsemane. The implied argument is that if Jesus's physical appearance had differed markedly from his disciples, then he would have been relatively easy to identify.

Miraculous images of Jesus

Main articles: Acheiropoieta, Divine Mercy image, and Head of Christ
Secondo Pia's negative of his 1898 photo of the Shroud of Turin. Many Christians believe this image to be the Holy Face of Jesus.

There are, however, some images which have been claimed to realistically show how Jesus looked. One early tradition, recorded by Eusebius of Caesarea, says that Jesus once washed his face with water and then dried it with a cloth, leaving an image of his face imprinted on the cloth. This was sent by him to King Abgarus of Edessa, who had sent a messenger asking Jesus to come and heal him of his disease. This image, called the Mandylion or Image of Edessa, appears in history in around 525. Numerous replicas of this "image not made by human hands" remain in circulation. There are also icon compositions of Jesus and Mary that are traditionally believed by many Orthodox to have originated in paintings by Luke the Evangelist.

A currently familiar depiction is that on the Shroud of Turin, whose records go back to 1353. Controversy surrounds the shroud and its exact origin remains subject to debate. The Shroud of Turin is respected by Christians of several traditions, including Baptists, Catholics, Lutherans, Methodists, Orthodox, Pentecostals, and Presbyterians. It is one of the Catholic devotions approved by the Holy See, that to the Holy Face of Jesus, now uses the image of the face on the shroud as it appeared in the negative of the photograph taken by amateur photographer Secondo Pia in 1898. The image cannot be clearly seen on the shroud itself with the naked eye, and it surprised Pia to the extent that he said he almost dropped and broke the photographic plate when he first saw the developed negative image on it in the evening of 28 May 1898.

Before 1898, devotion to the Holy Face of Jesus used an image based on the Veil of Veronica, where legend recounts that Veronica from Jerusalem encountered Jesus along the Via Dolorosa on the way to Calvary. When she paused to wipe the sweat from Jesus's face with her veil, the image was imprinted on the cloth. The establishment of these images as Catholic devotions traces back to Sister Marie of St Peter and the Venerable Leo Dupont who started and promoted them from 1844 to 1874 in Tours France, and Sister Maria Pierina De Micheli who associated the image from the Shroud of Turin with the devotion in 1936 in Milan Italy.

"The Saviour Not Made by Hands", a Novgorodian icon from c. 1100 based on a Byzantine model

A very popular 20th-century depiction among Roman Catholics and Anglicans is the Divine Mercy image, which was approved by Pope John Paul II in April 2000. The Divine Mercy depiction is formally used in celebrations of Divine Mercy Sunday and is venerated by over 100 million Catholics who follow the devotion. The image is not part of Acheiropoieta in that it has been depicted by modern artists, but the pattern of the image is said to have been miraculously shown to Saint Faustina Kowalska in a vision of Jesus in 1931 in Płock, Poland.

Faustina wrote in her diary that Jesus appeared to her and asked her to "Paint an image according to the pattern you see". Faustina eventually found an artist (Eugene Kazimierowski) to depict the Divine Mercy image of Jesus with his right hand raised in a sign of blessing and the left hand touching the garment near his breast, with two large rays, one red, the other white emanating from near his heart. After Faustina's death, a number of other artists painted the image, with the depiction by Adolf Hyla being among the most reproduced.

Warner Sallman stated that The Head of Christ was the result of a "miraculous vision that he received late one night", proclaiming that "the answer came at 2 A.M., January 1924" as "a vision in response to my prayer to God in a despairing situation." The Head of Christ is venerated in the Coptic Orthodox Church, after twelve-year-old Isaac Ayoub, who diagnosed with cancer, saw the eyes of Jesus in the painting shedding tears; Fr. Ishaq Soliman of St. Mark's Coptic Church in Houston, on the same day, "testified to the miracles" and on the next day, "Dr. Atef Rizkalla, the family physician, examined the youth and certified that there were no traces of leukemia".

With episcopal approval from Bishop Tadros of Port Said and Bishop Yuhanna of Cairo, "Sallman's Head of Christ was exhibited in the Coptic Church", with "more than fifty thousand people" visiting the church to see it. In addition, several religious magazines have explained the "power of Sallman's picture" by documenting occurrences such as headhunters letting go of a businessman and fleeing after seeing the image, a "thief who aborted his misdeed when he saw the Head of Christ on a living room wall", and deathbed conversions of non-believers to Christianity. As an extraordinarily successful work of Christian popular devotional art, it had been reproduced over half a billion times worldwide by the end of the 20th century.

Examples

Sculpture

Main article: List of statues of Jesus

See also

Notes

  1. Philip Schaff commenting on Irenaeus, wrote, 'This censure of images as a Gnostic peculiarity, and as a heathenish corruption, should be noted'. Footnote 300 on Contr. Her. .I.XXV.6. ANF
  2. Synod of Elvira, 'Pictures are not to be placed in churches, so that they do not become objects of worship and adoration', AD 306, Canon 36
  3. Kitzinger, Ernst, "The Cult of Images in the Age before Iconoclasm", Dumbarton Oaks Papers, Vol. 8, (1954), pp. 83–150, Dumbarton Oaks, Trustees for Harvard University, JSTOR
  4. "The Early Church on the Aniconic Spectrum". The Westminster Theological Journal. 83 (1): 35–47. ISSN 0043-4388. Retrieved 2 March 2022.
  5. Lisa Maurice, Screening Divinity, Edinburgh University Press, Scotland, 2019, p. 30
  6. Robin M. Jensen, The Cross: History, Art, and Controversy, Harvard University Press, USA, 2017, p. 185
  7. Cameron J. Anderson, The Faithful Artist: A Vision for Evangelicalism and the Arts, InterVarsity Press, USA, 2016, p. 124
  8. Doug Jones, Sound of Worship, Taylor & Francis, Abingdon-on-Thames, 2013, p. 90
  9. Matthew 14:46
  10. Luke 8:43–44
  11. Taylor, Joan E. (2018). What did Jesus look like?. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark. p. 1-14. ISBN 978-0-567-67150-9.
  12. Harold W. Attridge, Gohei Hata, et al. Eusebius, Christianity, and Judaism. Wayne, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1992. pp. 283–284.
  13. Baird, Jennifer A. (2018). Dura-Europos. Archaeological histories. London New York Oxford New Delhi Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic. p. 139-141. ISBN 978-1-4725-2365-5.
  14. English translation found at Catholic University of America, accessed 5 September 2012
  15. John Calvin Institutes of the Christian Religion Book 1, Chapter V. Section 6.
  16. Hellemo, pp. 3–6, and Cartlidge and Elliott, 61 (Eusebius quotation) and passim. Clement approved the use of symbolic pictograms.
  17. The Second Church: Popular Christianity A.D. 200–400 by Ramsay MacMullen, The Society of Biblical Literature, 2009
  18. McKay, John; Hill, Bennett (2011). A History of World Societies, Combined Volume (9 ed.). United States: Macmillan. p. 166. ISBN 978-0-312-66691-0. Retrieved 5 August 2013.
  19. Orpheus as a symbol for David was already found in hellenized Jewish art. Hall, 66
  20. Syndicus, 21–3
  21. Cartlidge and Elliott, 53–55. See also The Two Faces of Jesus by Robin M. Jensen, Bible Review, 17.8, October 2002, and Understanding Early Christian Art by Robin M. Jensen, Routledge, 2000
  22. Hall, 70–71
  23. Turner, Katie (2022). "Clothing and Dress in the Time of Jesus". Bloomsbury CJL (1 ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing. doi:10.5040/9781350928077.003. ISBN 978-1-350-92807-7.
  24. Zanker, 299
  25. Every, George; Christian Mythology, p. 65, Hamlyn 1988 (1970 1st edn.) ISBN 0-600-34290-5
  26. Syndicus, 92
  27. Cartlidge and Elliott, 53 – this is Psalm 44 in the Latin Vulgate; English bible translations prefer "glory" and "majesty"
  28. Zanker, 302.
  29. Schiller, I 132. The image comes from the crypt of Lucina in the Catacombs_of_San_Callisto. There are a number of other 3rd-century images.
  30. Painted over 40 times in the catacombs of Rome, from the early 3rd century on, and also on sarcophagii. As with the Baptism, some early examples are from Gaul. Schiller, I, 181
  31. Syndicus, 94–95
  32. Syndicus, 92–93, Catacomb images
  33. "Catholic Encyclopedia: Portraits of the Apostles". Retrieved 10 August 2008.
  34. Cartlidge and Elliott, 60
  35. The Two Faces of Jesus by Robin M. Jensen, Bible Review, 17.8, Oct 2002
  36. ^ New Catholic Encyclopedia: Portraits of the Apostles
  37. Jesus, the Magician by Morton Smith, Harper & Row, 1978
  38. Jefferson, Lee M. (2020). "Jesus the Magician? Why Jesus holds a wand in early Christian art". Biblical Archaeology Society Library. Retrieved 25 February 2024.
  39. Zanker, 302
  40. Zanker, 300–303, who is rather dismissive of other origins for the type
  41. Syndicus, 93
  42. Cartlidge and Elliott, 56–57. St Paul often has a long beard, but short hair, as in the catacomb fresco illustrated. St John the Baptist also often has long hair and a beard, and often retains in later art the thick shaggy or wavy long hair seen on some of the earliest depictions of Jesus, and in images of philosophers of the Charismatic type.
  43. Zanker, 257–266 on the charismatics; 299–306 on the type used for Christ
  44. Zanker, pp. 299, note 48, and 300. . See also Cartlidge and Elliott, 55–61.
  45. Grabar, 119
  46. Zanker, 290
  47. Syndicus, 92–97, though images of Christ the King are found in the previous century also – Hellemo, 6
  48. Hellemo, 7–14, citing K. Berger in particular.
  49. Zanker, 299. Zanker has a full account of the development of the image of Christ at pp. 289–307.
  50. The two parts of the cycle are on opposite walls of the nave; Talbot Rice, 157. Bridgeman Library Archived 11 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  51. "Last Judgment", Esperanca Camara, Khan Academy; Blunt Anthony, Artistic Theory in Italy, 1450–1600, 112–114, 118–119 (refs to 1985 edn), OUP, ISBN 0198810504
  52. The Shroud of Christ ("marks") by Paul Vignon, Paul Tice, (2002 – ISBN 1-885395-96-5)
  53. The Shroud of Christ ("Constantinople") by Paul Vignon, Paul Tice, op. cit.
  54. Grigg, 5–7
  55. Regarding the alternate NIV translation of 1 Corinthians 11:7, and in agreement with modern interpretations of the New Testament, Walvoord and Zuck note, "The alternate translation in the NIV margin, which interprets the man's covering as long hair, is largely based on the view that verse 15 equated the covering with long hair. It is unlikely, however, that this was the point of verse 4." John F. Walvoord and Roy B. Zuck, eds., The Bible Knowledge Commentary: New Testament, "1 Corinthians 11:4", (Wheaton: Victor Books, 1983)
  56. Institute for Classical Christian Studies (ICCS) and Thomas Oden, eds., The Ancient Christian Commentary Series, "1 Corinthians 1:4", (Westmont: Inter-Varsity Press, 2005), ISBN 0-8308-2492-8. Google Books
  57. ^ The New Westminster Dictionary of Church History by Robert Benedetto 2006 ISBN 0-8264-8011-X pp. 51–53
  58. Jensen, Robin M. (2010). "Jesus in Christian art". In Burkett, Delbert (ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Jesus. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 477–502. ISBN 978-1-4443-5175-0.
  59. ^ Iconography of Christian Art, Vol. I by G. Schiller 1971 Lund Humphries, London. figs 150-53, 346-54. ISBN 0-85331-270-2 pp. 181–184
  60. The image of God the Father in Orthodox theology and iconography by Steven Bigham 1995 ISBN 1-879038-15-3 pp. 226–227
  61. Archimandrite Vasileios of Stavronikita, "Icons as Liturgical Analogies" in Hymn of entry: liturgy and life in the Orthodox church 1997 ISBN 978-0-88141-026-6 pp. 81–90
  62. ^ The image of St Francis by Rosalind B. Brooke 2006 ISBN 0-521-78291-0 pp. 183–184
  63. The tradition of Catholic prayer by Christian Raab, Harry Hagan, St. Meinrad Archabbey 2007 ISBN 0-8146-3184-3 pp. 86–87
  64. ^ The vitality of the Christian tradition by George Finger Thomas 1944 ISBN 0-8369-2378-2 pp. 110–112
  65. La vida sacra: contemporary Hispanic sacramental theology by James L. Empereur, Eduardo Fernández 2006 ISBN 0-7425-5157-1 pp. 3–5
  66. Philippines by Lily Rose R. Tope, Detch P. Nonan-Mercado 2005 ISBN 0-7614-1475-4 p. 109
  67. Experiencing Art Around Us by Thomas Buser 2005 ISBN 978-0-534-64114-6 pp. 382–383
  68. Leonardo da Vinci, the Last Supper: a Cosmic Drama and an Act of Redemption by Michael Ladwein 2006 pp. 27, 60
  69. Browne, Thomas. The Works of Thomas Browne Vol. 2. Gutenberg.
  70. Arthur Barnes, 2003 Holy Shroud of Turin Kessinger Press ISBN 0-7661-3425-3 pp. 2–9
  71. William Meacham, The Authentication of the Turin Shroud:An Issue in Archaeological Epistemology, Current Anthropology, Volume 24, No 3, June 1983
  72. "Zenit, May 5, 2010". Zenit.org. 5 May 2010. Archived from the original on 27 September 2012. Retrieved 4 November 2011.
  73. Catherine M. Odell, 1998, Faustina: Apostle of Divine Mercy OSV Press ISBN 978-0-87973-923-2 p. 165
  74. ^ Am With You Always by Benedict Groeschel 2010 ISBN 978-1-58617-257-2 p. 548
  75. The Challenge of the Silver Screen (Studies in Religion and the Arts) By Freek L. Bakker 2009 ISBN 90-04-16861-3 p. 1
  76. Encyclopedia of early cinema by Richard Abe 2005 ISBN 0-415-23440-9 p. 518
  77. The Blackwell Companion to Jesus edited by Delbert Burkett 2010 ISBN 1-4051-9362-X p. 526
  78. ""Super Size Me": Recognizing Jesus". Archived from the original on 5 July 2022. Retrieved 13 August 2020.
  79. A 12th-century English example is in the Getty Museum Archived 7 June 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  80. Wells, Matt (27 March 2001). "Is this the real face of Jesus Christ?". The Guardian. London: Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. OCLC 60623878. Retrieved 12 May 2011.
  81. ^ Legon, Jeordan (25 December 2002). "From science and computers, a new face of Jesus". CNN. Retrieved 12 May 2011.
  82. ^ Wilson, Giles (27 October 2004). "So what color was Jesus?". BBC News. London. Retrieved 12 May 2011.
  83. "Experts Reconstruct Face Of Jesus". London: CBS. 27 March 2001. Retrieved 12 May 2011.
  84. ^ Fillon, Mike (7 December 2002). "The Real Face Of Jesus". Popular Mechanics. San Francisco: Hearst. ISSN 0032-4558. OCLC 3643271. Retrieved 12 May 2011.
  85. William Meacham, The Authentication of the Turin Shroud: An Issue in Archaeological Epistemology, Current Anthropology, Volume 24, No 3, June 1983
  86. The Rev. Albert R. Dreisbach (1997). "The Shroud of Turin: Its Ecumenical Implications". Returning to the ecumenical dimension of this sacred linen, it became very evident to me on the night of August 16, 1983, when local judicatory leaders offered their corporate blessing to the TURIN SHROUD EXHIBIT and participated in the Evening Office of the Holy Shroud. The Greek Archbishop, the Roman Catholic Archbishop, the Episcopal Bishop and the Presiding Bishop of the AME Church gathered before the world's first full size, backlit transparency of the Shroud and joined clergy representing the Assemblies of God, Baptists, Lutherans, Methodists and Presbyterians in an amazing witness to ecumenical unity. At the conclusion of the service, His Grace Bishop John of the Greek Orthodox Diocese of Atlanta, turned to me and said: "Thank you very much for picking our day." I didn't fully understand the significance of his remark until he explained to me that August 16th is the Feast of the Holy Mandylion commemorating the occasion in 944 A.D. when the Shroud was first shown to the public in Byzantium following its arrival the previous day from Edessa in southeastern Turkey. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help)
  87. Joan Carroll Cruz, 1984, Relics OSV Press ISBN 0-87973-701-8 p. 49
  88. ^ Ann Ball, 2003 Encyclopedia of Catholic Devotions and Practices ISBN 0-87973-910-X pp. 239, 635
  89. Brockman, Norbert (2011). Encyclopedia of Sacred Places. ABC-CLIO. p. 140. ISBN 978-1-59884-654-6.
  90. ^ Tim Drake, 2002, Saints of the Jubilee, ISBN 978-1-4033-1009-5 pp. 85–95
  91. ^ A Divine Mercy Resource by Richard Torretto 2010 ISBN 1-4502-3236-1 "The Image of Divine Mercy" pp. 84–107
  92. Catherine M. Odell, 1998, Faustina: Apostle of Divine Mercy OSV Press ISBN 978-0-87973-923-2 pp. 63–64
  93. Butler's lives of the saints: the third millennium by Paul Burns, Alban Butler 2001 ISBN 978-0-86012-383-5 p. 252
  94. Morgan, David (1996). Icons of American Protestantism: The Art of Warner Sallman. Yale University Press. p. 62. ISBN 978-0-300-06342-4. Sallman always insisted that his initial sketch of Jesus was the result of spiritual "picturization," a miraculous vision that he received late one night. "The answer came at 2 A.M., January 1924," he wrote. "It came as a vision in response to my prayer to God in a despairing situation." The situation was a deadline: Sallman had been commissioned to paint the February cover for the Covenant Companion, the monthly magazine of the Evangelical Covenant Church, and he had artist's block for weeks. The February issue was focusing on Christian youth, and Sallman's assignment was to provide an inspirational image of Christ that would "challenge our young people." "I mused over it for a long time in prayer and meditation," Sallman recalled, "seeking for something which would catch the eye and convey the message of the Christian gospel on the cover."
  95. Otto F.A. Meinardus, Ph.D. (Fall 1997). "Theological Issues of the Coptic Orthodox Inculturation in Western Society". Coptic Church Review. 18 (3). ISSN 0273-3269. An interesting case of inculturation occurred on Monday, November 11, 1991 when the 12-year-old Isaac Ayoub of Houston, Texas, suffering from leukemia, saw that the eyes of Jesus in the famous Sallman Head of Christ began moving and shedding an oily liquid like tears. On the same day, Fr. Ishaq Soliman, the Coptic priest of St. Mark's Coptic Church in Houston, testified to the miracles. On the following day, Dr. Atef Rizkalla, the family physician, examined the youth and certified that there were no traces of leukemia. Sallman's Head of Christ was exhibited in the Coptic Church and more than 50,000 people visited the church. Two Coptic bishops, Anbâ Tadros of Port Said and Anbâ Yuhanna of Cairo verified the story.
  96. ^ Meinardus, Otto F. A. (2006). Christians In Egypt: Orthodox, Catholic, and Protestant Communities – Past and Present. American University in Cairo Press. p. 70. ISBN 978-1-61797-262-1. An interesting case of inculturation took place on Monday, November 11, 1991 when the twelve-year-old Isaac Ayoub of Houston, Texas, suffering from leukemia, saw that the eyes of Jesus in the famous Sallman "Head of Christ" began moving and shedding an oily liquid like tears. On the same day, Father Ishaq Soliman, the Coptic priest of St. Mark's Coptic Church in Houston, testified to the miracles. On the following day, Dr. Atef Rizkalla, the family physician, examined the youth and certified that there were no traces of leukemia. Sallman's Head of Christ was exhibited in the Coptic Church and more than fifty thousand people visited the church. Two Coptic bishops, Bishop Tadros of Port Said and Bishop Yuhanna of Cairo, verified the story.
  97. Morgan, David (1996). The Art of Warner Sallman. Yale University Press. p. 192. ISBN 978-0-300-06342-4. Articles published in popular religious magazines during this time gathered together in an obviously didactic way several anecdotes concerning the power of Sallman's picture among nonwhites, non-Christians, and those exhibiting unacceptable behavior. We read of a white businessman, for instance, in a remote jungle, assaulted by a vicious group of headhunters who demand that he remove his clothes. In going through his billfold, they discover a small reproduction of Sallman's Christ, quickly apologize, then vanish "into the jungle without inflicting further harm." A second article relates the story of the thief who aborted his misdeed when he saw the Head of Christ on a living room wall. Another tells of the conversion of a Jewish woman on her deathbed, when a hospital chaplain shows her Sallman's picture.
  98. Lippy, Charles H. (1994). Being Religious, American Style: A History of Popular Religiosity in the United States. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 185. ISBN 978-0-313-27895-2. Retrieved 30 April 2014. Of these one stands out as having deeply impressed itself of the American religious consciousness: the Head of Christ by artist Warner Sallman (1892–1968). Originally sketched in charcoal as a cover illustration for the Covenant Companion, the magazine of the Swedish Evangelical Mission Covenant of America denomination, and based on an image of Jesus in a painting by the French artist Leon Augustin Lhermitte, Sallman's Head of Christ was painted in 1940. In half a century, it had been produced more than five hundred million times in formats ranging from large-scale copies for use in churches to wallet-sized ones that individuals could carry with them at all times.
  99. Blum, Edward J.; Harvey, Paul (2012). Color of Christ. UNC Press Books. p. 211. ISBN 978-0-8078-3737-5. Retrieved 30 April 2014. By the 1990s, Sallman's Head of Christ had been printed more than 500 million times and had achieved global iconic status.
  100. "Construction progressing on new Jesus statue along I-75". WCPO. 15 June 2012. Archived from the original on 29 June 2013. Retrieved 7 September 2012.

References

External links

Jesus
Chronology
of Jesus's life
New Testament
Historicity
Depictions
Christianity
In other faiths
Family
Related
Christianity
Bible
(Scriptures)
Foundations
History
(timeline)
(spread)
Early
Christianity
Great Church
Middle Ages
Modern era
Denominations
(list, members)
Western
Eastern
Restorationist
Theology
Philosophy
Other
features
Culture
Movements
Cooperation
Related
Life of Jesus in art
Topics
Related
Religion and philosophy in popular culture
Main articles
Religions and
philosophies
Other concepts
Categories: