| Revision as of 00:23, 11 March 2008 edit76.178.89.6 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:29, 29 January 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Replaced obsolete font tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (22 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|1= This was the only account I had and I'm not a sockpuppet. I was falsely accused.|decline=In view of your previous disruption, a mere protestation of innocence is not enough to call this block into doubt. Convince us. See ]. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 17:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
| ==Your recent edits== | |||
| Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should ] by typing four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!<!-- Template:Tilde --> --] (]) 19:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1= I'm innocent. I contacted a user by the name of Canadian Paul to ask him how he got his userbox on his talk page. I first noticed his page after witnessing vandalism by a user on ] or another article on details about ], but after asking CP, then he put me in a sockpuppet case. I did nothing wrong in my opinion.|decline=At the very least, you were edit warring; this is a blockable offense in itself. Beside that, you were being disruptive elsewhere. Your actions do seem to relate to those of another user, and this block seems valid. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 02:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
| Thanks for the advice I didn't know how that was done.(] (]) 20:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)) | |||
| ==Wiki Boxing Project - input needed== | |||
| == Blocked for vandalism and ] violations == | |||
| There is a discussing relating to the use of boxer's nickname/s in the infobox. Please could you give your opinion ]. Thanks.--] (]) 15:19, 16 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been {{#ifeq:|yes|'''] indefinitely'''|{{#if:24 hours|''']''' for a period of '''24 hours'''|'''temporarily ]'''}}}} from editing in accordance with ] for persistent ''']'''. {{#ifeq:|yes||Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ].}} If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|Cheers, ] 23:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)}}</div>{{#ifeq:|yes|]}}</div><!-- Template:uw-vblock --> | |||
| You have been warned multiple times by various users (, , , ) and have removed these warnings, which is a sign of bad faith. Warnings were issued for a variety of reasons as indicated above and may be perused by examining the rationale for the complaints. In my case it was violations of ] by changing sourced birth years to unsourced ones (, ) and removing references that cite material for living people (). Other examples of inserting false information that did not garner a warning include: , and possibly others. Earlier edits seemed to indicate a willingness to contribute positively, including admonishing others for the very behavior that you are now engaging in, such as adding unsourced material. | |||
| Please review some of Misplaced Pages's core policies regarding ], especially on ], so that you may contribute positively after the block has expired. Cheers, ] 23:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I got rid of the other notes because i didn't want my discussion page to get to big thats not vandalism. It is not bad faith. I changed Isacc Bruce's birthdate because ] said something else. I don't know how to put references on. This is a very stupid block.|decline=Whether removing the warnings was bad faith or not is immaterial; you have been warned and persisted. I am reseting your block to a full 24h in view of your creation of a ] to faux-accept your unblock request. — ] <sup>]</sup> 23:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)}} | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|I didn't create another account because its impossible my ip is blocked as well.|decline=Did too. ], ], and ] are all the same person.]--]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 01:08, 2 March 2008 (UTC)}} | |||
| ::I've left this message before and I see that I need to leave it again: '''You should be adding the season highlights to Misplaced Pages, not every time someone spins out.''' ]. "Misplaced Pages considers the historical notability of persons and events." Please acquire the perspective that what we doing is creating content about the history of a person, not every time that they spin out or have problems. You should be concentrating on the people that win the race, not everyone that has problems. ] 05:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Admin? == | |||
| In this edit, you claim to be an admin, but I don't see you on the list of administrators. Care to explain? - ] | ] 00:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I, however, AM an admin. I strongly suggest that you immediately withdraw that comment for a couple of reasons. First, there's no such thing as a "hide" admin. Second, being an admin gives you no additional power in content disputes. - ] | ] 00:03, 11 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I've removed the admin userbox from your userpage. It is not true, you are not an admin. By contributing to Misplaced Pages in a constructive and neutral way, over time, it very well may be true, but right now, you shouldn't have an admin userbox as it is misleading. ] | ] | ] 00:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::I have blocked you for a week for disruption, there is no such thing as a "secret agent admin", this is not the first time that you have been blocked and that was taken under consideration before issuing said block. - ] 00:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Reversion== | |||
| Please do not revert sensible edits, such as mine for ] ], to ], without talking on the talk page of the article. I am '''not''' a vandal, I do not commit vandalism, and I object strongly to that characterization, as you did at . ] (]) 00:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=Disruption? I was told to provide the specific source to ]. I did and i get banned anyways. That page is getting vandalized like 9 times a minute i tried to get the facts in, but i can't stop everything.|decline=You weren't blocked for that. You were blocked for claiming to be an admin, first to another user and then to me. — - ] | ] 00:16, 11 March 2008 (UTC)}} | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I was trying to stop vandalism on the ] page i posed to be an admin so people would stop vandalizing pages as much. I didn't know you couldn't do that im new to this website and to the rules.|decline=Then you should have told admin, or at least not posed as admin to an admin. The decision is final.}} | |||
| {{subst:Request Accepted|Reason}} | |||
| == Fair warning == | |||
| I hate to see it come to this, but you have had a history of less than civil behavior and misrepresentation of yourself and your actions. This block is currently set for two weeks. The next one will very likely be indefinite. Consider this a friendly warning from somebody who has seen this happen too many times before. – ]] 00:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Correction, the block is currently set for ONE week. - ] | ] 00:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::My mistake. – ]] 00:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:29, 29 January 2022
Gordon24fan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This was the only account I had and I'm not a sockpuppet. I was falsely accused.
Decline reason:
In view of your previous disruption, a mere protestation of innocence is not enough to call this block into doubt. Convince us. See WP:GAB. Sandstein 17:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gordon24fan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm innocent. I contacted a user by the name of Canadian Paul to ask him how he got his userbox on his talk page. I first noticed his page after witnessing vandalism by a user on Anne Frank or another article on details about World War II, but after asking CP, then he put me in a sockpuppet case. I did nothing wrong in my opinion.
Decline reason:
At the very least, you were edit warring; this is a blockable offense in itself. Beside that, you were being disruptive elsewhere. Your actions do seem to relate to those of another user, and this block seems valid. Hersfold 02:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Wiki Boxing Project - input needed
There is a discussing relating to the use of boxer's nickname/s in the infobox. Please could you give your opinion here. Thanks.--Vintagekits (talk) 15:19, 16 October 2009 (UTC)