Revision as of 05:57, 29 July 2005 editAmin123 (talk | contribs)226 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:06, 9 December 2024 edit undoStAnselm (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers160,566 edits added wikilink | ||
(722 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|none}} | |||
'''Christianity and world religions''' appear to share some elements. In a look at Christianity's relationship with other world religions, this article investigates the differences and similiarities of Christianity to other religions. | |||
{{Multiple issues| | |||
{{synthesis|date=March 2009}} | |||
{{more citations needed|date=September 2007}} | |||
{{lead too short|date=October 2018}} | |||
}} | |||
{{Christianity|expanded=Related}} | |||
'''Christianity and other religions''' documents ]'s relationship with other world religions, and the differences and similarities. | |||
==Christian groups== | |||
==Relationship with Judaism== | |||
{{See also|Catholic–Protestant relations|Catholic–Eastern Orthodox relations}} | |||
==Christian views on religious pluralism== | |||
The Jewish conception of the ] (משיח "mashiach" in Hebrew) holds certain similarities to that of Christians, yet there are substantial differences. According to ]s, the ] contain a small number of prophecies concerning a future descendant of King ], who will be anointed (Hebrew: moshiach) as the Jewish people's new leader and will establish the throne of David in Jerusalem forever. In the Jewish view, this fully human and mortal leader will rebuild the land of ] and restore the Davidic Kingdom. This subject is covered in the section on ]. Christian understandings of the term "messiah" are based on Jesus' statements about himself in the New Testament, namely: (a) that he was the fulfilment of many ] prophecies, most significantly the 'Servant Songs' in Isaiah, (b) that he came to establish the Kingdom of God (or ]), which was not to be an earthly kingdom, (c) that when asked whether he was the expected messiah, he pointed at the miracles he performed, (d) prophecies he fulfilled, (e) as well as referring to himself by titles that Jews would recognize as belonging properly to the messiah, and (f) by showing himself to be the exemplar of lowliness of mind in his role as heir of the Kingdom of God. (See ] and ]). | |||
===Western Christian views=== | |||
==Possible relationship with Zoroastrianism through the Judaism== | |||
Some Christians have argued that ] is an invalid or a self-contradictory concept. Maximal forms of religious pluralism claim that all religions are equally true, or they claim that one religion can be true for some people and another religion can be true for others. Some Christians hold the view that such pluralism is logically impossible.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091003214003/http://www.christianministriesintl.org/articles/12.html |date=2009-10-03 }} By Jason Carlson, Christian Ministries International</ref> ] believes that while it is the fullest and most complete revelation of God to man, other Christian denominations have also received genuine ]. | |||
Although ] believe that God and the truth of God cannot be plural, they also believe that those civil ordinances of man which restrain man from doing evil and encourage man to do good, are ordinances of God (regardless of the religion, or the lack of it, of those who wield that power). Christians are obligated to be at peace with all men, as far as it is up to them, and they are also obligated to submit to governments for the Lord's sake, and pray for their enemies. Calvinism is not pacifistic, and as a result, Calvinists have been involved in religious wars, most notably, they were involved in the ] and the ]. Some of the first parts of modern Europe where religious tolerance was practiced had Calvinistic populations, most notably the ].{{citation needed|date=April 2021}} | |||
Some scholars{{ref|ZoroastrianismScholars}} believe the entire eschatology of Judaism, a key influence on Christianity, originated in ], and was transferred to Judaism during the ]. They also believe Monotheism to have been a Zoroastrian influence, as Isaiah supposedly makes a first monotheistic declaration (Isaiah 45:5-7) during the reign of the Persian Kings, that corresponding to his declaration that Jews were to obey ], Kouroush in Persian ( and ). According to ] "Zoroastrianism is the oldest of the revealed credal religions, and it has probably had more influence on mankind, directly or indirectly, than any other single faith... some of its leading doctrines were adopted by Judaism, Christianity and Islam". {{ref|Boyce}} Zoroastrianism has been proposed as the source of some of the most important post-] aspects of Judaic religious thinking, which emerged after the ], from which Jews were liberated by Cyrus the Great. This is a view put forward by King and Moore, who wrote in ''The Gnostics and Their Remains'' (1887) that "it was from this very creed of Zoroaster that the Jews derived all the angelology of their religion... the belief in a future state; of rewards and punishments, ...the soul's immortality, and the Last Judgment - all of them essential parts of the Zoroastrian scheme." {{ref|KingMoore}} | |||
] believe that religious pluralism is ] and contradicts the ].<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170908152915/http://www.thegospelcoalition.org/about/foundation-documents/confessional/ |date=2017-09-08 }} By ]</ref> | |||
However, according to other scholars, the Persians may have gotten some of their ideas from the Jews, and from Ezekiel or Daniel. There are general ideas they have in common, but in terms of borrowing, no definitive evidence exists one way or the other, and a determination depends on the interpretations and datings of Zoroastrian texts. According to ], Zoroastrian scholars offer no consensus on the subject; he cites one Zoroastrian scholar who believes that the Jews borrowed, another that says there is no way to tell who borrowed, and yet another who says that the borrowing was the other way.{{ref|Yamauchi}} ] states "we cannot say with any certainty whether the Jews borrowed from Zoroastrianism or the Zoroastrians from the Jews or whether either in fact borrowed from each other"{{ref|Zaehner}} and the ''The Oxford History of the Biblical World'' states "There is little if any effect of Zoroastrian elements on Judaism in the Persian period."{{ref|OxfordHistoryOnZoroastrianism}} | |||
===Eastern Orthodox views=== | |||
==Relationship with Mithraism== | |||
{{See also|Eastern Orthodoxy and Judaism}} | |||
===Modern (post-Enlightenment) Christian views=== | |||
There are many parallels between ] and Christianity. These include the central figures of each religion having the same birthdate (December 25th) and virgin births, the stories of Christ and Mithra as children being visited by shepherds, the trinity, and the immortal soul. Mithraism was popular in the Roman administered regions before the advent of Christianity, and some have theorized that these themes were transferred to early Christianity by proponents of Mithraism. | |||
{{unreferenced section|date=April 2021}} | |||
In recent years, some Christian groups have become more open to religious pluralism; this has led to many cases of reconciliation between Christians and people of other faiths. The liberalization of many seminaries and theological institutions, particularly in regards to the rejection of the notion that the Bible is an infallible document, has led to a much more human-centered and secular movement within Mainline Christian denominations, particularly in the United States. Some Mainline churches no longer hold to ] views on salvation. | |||
In recent years there has been much to note in the way of reconciliation between some Christian groups and the Jewish people. Many modern day Christians, including many Catholics and some liberal Protestants, have developed a view of the New Testament as an extended covenant; they believe that ]s are still in a valid relationship with God, and that Jews can avoid damnation and earn a heavenly reward. For these Christians, the New Testament extended God's original covenant to cover non-Jews. The article ] deals with this issue in detail. | |||
However, writers of Christian ] have argued that because the Gospels were written before 100 and that since little is known of Roman Mithraism until after 100 that it is not possible to definitively state that Christianity borrowed any of its doctrines from Mithraism; some have even suggested it is more likely the flow was the other way. {{ref|carm}} Ronald H. Nash has stated "allegations of an early Christian dependence on Mithraism have been rejected on many grounds. Mithraism had no concept of the death and resurrection of its god and no place for any concept of rebirth -- at least during its early stages...During the early stages of the cult, the notion of rebirth would have been foreign to its basic outlook...Moreover, Mithraism was basically a military cult. Therefore, one must be skeptical about suggestions that it appealed to nonmilitary people like the early Christians." {{ref|Nash}} | |||
Multiple smaller Christian groups in the US and Canada have come into being over the last 40 years, such as "Christians for Israel." Their website says that they exist in order to "expand Christian-Jewish dialogue in the broadest sense in order to improve the relationship between Christians and Jews, but also between Church and Synagogue, emphasizing Christian repentance, the purging of anti-Jewish preliminary attitudes and the false 'Replacement' theology rampant throughout Christian teachings." | |||
A number of large Christian groups, including the Catholic Church and several large Protestant churches, have publicly declared that they will no longer ] Jews. | |||
Other Modern Christian views, including some conservative ], reject the idea of the New Testament as an extended covenant, and retain the classical Christian view as described earlier. | |||
===Modern views specific to Catholicism=== | |||
{{Main|Catholic Church and ecumenism}} | |||
For the Catholic Church, there has been a move at reconciliation not only with Judaism, but also ]. The ] states that salvation includes others who acknowledge the same creator, and explicitly lists Muslims among those (using the term ], which was the word commonly used among non-Muslims at the time). The official Catholic position is therefore that Jews, Muslims and Christians (including churches outside of Rome's authority) all acknowledge the same God, though Jews and Muslims have not yet received the gospel while other churches are generally considered deviant to a greater or lesser degree. | |||
The most prominent event in the way of dialogue between religions has arguably been the 1986 Peace Prayer in ], to which Pope ], against considerable resistance also from within the ] church, invited representatives of all world religions. John Paul II’s remarks regarding Christian denominations were found in his ] address. This initiative was taken up by the ], who, with the support of John Paul II, organized yearly peace meetings of religious representatives. These meetings, consisting of round tables on different issues and of a common time of prayer, have done much to further understanding and friendship between religious leaders and to further concrete peace initiatives. In order to avoid the reproaches of ] that were leveled at the 1986 Assisi meeting where the representatives of all religions held one common prayer, the follow-up meetings saw the representatives of the different religions pray in different places according to their respective traditions. | |||
The question of whether traditional Chinese ancestor veneration, consists of worshipping a God or veneration of a saint was important to the ] church during the ] of the early 18th century. This dispute was between the ]s who argued that Confucianism and Chinese folk religion was worship, and therefore incompatible with Catholicism, and the ] who argued the reverse. The ] ultimately ruled in favor of the Dominicans, a decision which greatly reduced the role of Catholic missionaries in China. However, this decision was partially reversed by Pope ] in 1939; after this, Chinese customs were no longer considered superstition or idolatry, but a way of honoring esteemed relatives (not entirely dissimilar to the Catholic practice of praying for the dead). | |||
==Relationship with the Baháʼí Faith== | |||
The ] believes that there is one God who sends ] to guide humanity throughout time, which is called ]—and is different from the Christian belief of ]. They believe in the divine knowledge and essence of ], among other messengers such as ], ], ], ], ], and others. Interpretations vary, but the Baháʼí Faith is sometimes considered an ]. The followers of the Baháʼí Faith believe in God, as do Christians, and recognize Jesus' teachings, but they have different views of the ] and divinity of Jesus. The Baháʼí view of prophets is that although they have both human and divine characteristics, they are not themselves God, but rather "divine manifestations." They also see the Trinity as symbolic where Jesus and the Holy Spirit are polished mirrors that reflect the pure light from God. Although Baháʼís affirm the Bible as sacred scripture, they do not consider the Bible to be wholly authentic as ], the ], affirmed that "The Bible is not wholly authentic, and in this respect not to be compared with the Qur’án, and should be wholly subordinated to the authentic Sayings of Bahá’u’lláh."<ref>{{cite book |last= Effendi |first= Shoghi| author-link = Shoghi Effendi |date= 1973 |title= Directives from the Guardian | chapter= 32: BIBLE (Authenticity of the)| chapter-url= http://reference.bahai.org/en/t/se/DG/dg-32.html| url= http://reference.bahai.org/en/t/se/DG/ }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= http://bahai-library.com/uhj_old_new_testaments |title= The Bible: Extracts on the Old and New Testaments |last1= Bahá'u'lláh, Abdu'l-Bahá, Shoghi Effendi, and Universal House of Justice |website= Baháʼí Library Online |access-date= November 6, 2016 }}</ref> | |||
Baháʼís share some views with Christianity regarding moral and immoral behavior. Baháʼís condemn ], ], and ] while treating everyone, including homosexuals, with love, respect, and dignity. | |||
==Relationship with Buddhism== | |||
{{main|Buddhism and Christianity}} | |||
In the 19th century, some scholars began to perceive similarities between Buddhist and Christian practices. For example, in 1878, ] wrote that the earliest missionaries to ] observed that similarities have been seen in Christianity and Buddhism since the first known contact was made between adherents of the two religions.<ref name=Davids>''Encyclopædia Britannica'', 1878 edition, article ''Buddhism'' by T.W. Rhys Davids</ref> In 1880 Ernest De Bunsen made similar observations and noted that except for the death of Jesus on the cross, and the Christian doctrine of atonement, the most ancient Buddhist records noted that similarities existed between Buddhist and Christian traditions.<ref>{{cite book|last=De Bunsen|first=Ernest|title=The Angel-Messiah of Buddhists, Essenes, and Christians|url=https://archive.org/details/angelmessiahofbu00bunsrich|year=1880|publisher=Longmans, Green, and Company|page=}}</ref> | |||
] and ] came into political conflict in 19th century ] and Tibet c. 1904 (the Francis Younghusband Expedition). Various individuals and organizations have helped introduce various strains of Buddhist theology and meditation to several generations of Western spiritual seekers (including some Catholic religious). Relations between both religions are generally good, except in ] where Christians have damaged ] and engaged in other forms of ].<ref>{{Cite journal|jstor = 1390412|title = Questions for Buddhist and Christian Cooperation in Korea|journal = Buddhist-Christian Studies|volume = 17|pages = 179–195|last1 = Tedesco|first1 = Frank|year = 1997|doi = 10.2307/1390412}}</ref> The Russian republic of ] recognizes ]/Lamaist Buddhism and ] as its official religions. | |||
==Relationship with Druze== | |||
{{Main|Christianity and Druze}} | |||
] al-Masih (]) in ]: Both religions revere Jesus.<ref name="Hitti 1928 37" /><ref name="Dana 2008 17" />]] | |||
] and ] are ]s that share a historical traditional connection with some major theological differences. The two faiths share a common place of origin in the ], and consider themselves to be ]. | |||
The relationship between the Druze and Christians has been characterized by ] and peaceful ],<ref>{{cite book|title=The Druze Community and the Lebanese State: Between Confrontation and Reconciliation| first=Yusri|last=Hazran|year= 2013| isbn= 9781317931737| page = 32|publisher=Routledge|quote= the Druze had been able to live in harmony with the Christian}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Confrontation and Coexistence| first=Pinḥas |last=Artzi|year= 1984| isbn= 9789652260499| page =166 |publisher=Bar-Ilan University Press|quote=.. Europeans who visited the area during this period related that the Druze "love the Christians more than the other believers," and that they "hate the Turks, the Muslims and the Arabs with an intense hatred.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title= The Druzes and the Maronites|last=CHURCHILL|year= 1862| page =25 |publisher=Montserrat Abbey Library|quote= ..the Druzes and Christians lived together in the most perfect harmony and good-will..}}</ref><ref name="Hobby 1985 53">{{cite book|title= Near East/South Asia Report|last=Hobby|year=1985| page =53|publisher=Foreign Broadcast Information Service|quote= the Druzes and the Christians in the Shuf Mountains in the past lived in complete harmony..}}</ref> with amicable relations between the two groups prevailing throughout history, with the exception of some periods, including ].<ref name="google">{{cite book |title=An Occasion for War: Civil Conflict in Lebanon and Damascus in 1860 |author=Fawaz, L.T. |date=1994 |publisher=] |isbn=9780520087828 |url=https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_nE7RjS91_E4C |access-date=2015-04-16}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Vocke |first=Harald |title=The Lebanese war: its origins and political dimensions |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Fvu6AAAAIAAJ&q=The+Lebanese+war:+its+origins+and+political+dimensions |year=1978 |publisher=C. Hurst |isbn=0-903983-92-3 |pages=10 }}</ref> | |||
] used to be common practice in the ] region.<ref>{{cite book|title=Catholics and Sultans: The Church and the Ottoman Empire 1453-1923|last= A. Frazee|first=Charles|year= 2006| isbn= 9780521027007 | page = 191|publisher=Cambridge University Press|quote =the conversion to Christianity of several Muslim and Druze families aided this growth immeasurably }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4b6fe27e0.pdf|title=Refugee Review Tribunal: What is the attitude of the Druze community toward inter-religious marriages?|date=6 June 2006|publisher=Refworl}}</ref> Over the centuries, several prominent members of the Druze community have embraced Christianity,<ref>{{cite book|title=The Arab Americans|first=Randa|last=A. Kayyali|year= 2006| isbn= 9780313332197| page =21 |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group|quote= some Christians (mostly from the Orthodox faith), as well as Druze, converted to Protestantism...}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=The Arab Americans|first=Randa|last=A. Kayyali|year= 2006| isbn= 9780313332197| page =21 |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group|quote= Many of the Druze have chosen to deemphasize their ethnic identity, and some have officially converted to Christianity.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title= Encyclopedia of Cultures and Daily Life|first=Jeneen|last=Hobby|year= 2011| isbn= 9781414448916| page =232 |publisher=University of Philadelphia Press|quote= US Druze settled in small towns and kept a low profile, joining Protestant churches (usually Presbyterian or Methodist) and often Americanizing their names..}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Granli | first1 = Elisabet | title =Religious conversion in Syria : Alawite and Druze believers | journal = ] | date = 2011 | url =https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/16181}}</ref> including some of ] members,<ref name="Mishaqa23">{{cite book|last1=Mishaqa|first1=Mikhail|editor1-last=Thackston|editor1-first=Wheeler McIntosh|title=Murder, Mayhem, Pillage, and Plunder: The History of the Lebanon in the 18th and 19th Centuries by Mikhayil Mishaqa (1800–1873)|date=1988|publisher=State University of New York Press|isbn=9780887067129|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ISHHYMNmp0gC&pg=PA23|page=23}}</ref> as well as the Abi-Lamma clan.<ref name="ÁgostonMasters2009">{{cite book|author1=Gábor Ágoston|author2=Bruce Alan Masters|title=Encyclopedia of the Ottoman Empire|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QjzYdCxumFcC&pg=PA530|access-date=2013-05-25|date=2009-01-01|publisher=Infobase Publishing|isbn=978-1-4381-1025-7|page=530}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=The Breakdown of the State in Lebanon, 1967-1976|last= al- H̲azīn|first= Farīd |year= 2000| isbn=9780674081055 | page = 35|publisher=Harvard University Press|quote =So did other amirs, like the originally Druze Abi-llamah family, which also became Maronite}}</ref> | |||
] and Druze communities share a long history of interaction dating back roughly a millennium, particularly in ].<ref>{{cite book|title=Lebanon: A House Divided|last=Mackey|first=Sandra|year=2006|isbn=9780393352764|page=62|publisher=W.W. Norton}}</ref> Interaction between Christian communities (], ], ], and others) and the Unitarian Druze, led to the presence of mixed villages and towns in ], ],<ref name="Hobby 1985 53"/> ],<ref name="Daftary1992">{{cite book|author=Farhad Daftary|title=The Isma'ilis: Their History and Doctrines|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kQGlyZAy134C&pg=PA375|access-date=13 September 2012|date=24 April 1992|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-42974-0|pages=375–}}</ref> ],<ref></ref> the ] region, ], and ].<ref>Fadwa N. Kirrish, "Druze Ethnicity in the Golan Heights: The Interface of Religion and Politics," Journal of the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs 13.1 (1992), 122-135</ref> The ] ]s and the Druze founded modern ] in the early eighteenth century, through a governing and social system known as the "]-Druze dualism" in the ].<ref>{{cite book|title=Syria, Iran, and Hezbollah: The Unholy Alliance and Its War on Lebanon| first=Marius|last=Deeb|year= 2013| isbn= 9780817916664|publisher=Hoover Press|quote= the Maronites and the Druze, who founded Lebanon in the early eighteenth century.}}</ref> | |||
Druze doctrine teaches that Christianity is to be "esteemed and praised" as the ] are regarded as "carriers of wisdom".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.commentary.org/articles/ray-alan/on-the-horizon-the-strange-world-of-the-druzes/|title=On the Horizon: The Strange World of the Druzes|date=20 January 1956|publisher=Commentary Magazine}}</ref> The Druze faith incorporates some elements of ],<ref>{{cite book|title=Syria and the New World Order| first= Neil |last= Quilliam|year= 1999| isbn= 9780863722493| page =42 |publisher=Michigan University press}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=The New Encyclopaedia Britannica|year= 1992| isbn= 9780852295533| page =237 |publisher=Encyclopaedia Britannica|quote= Druze religious beliefs developed out of Isma'ill teachings. Various Jewish, Christian, Gnostic, Neoplatonic, and Iranian elements, however, are combined under a doctrine of strict monotheism.}}</ref><ref name="Mahmut 2023">{{cite journal |last1=Mahmut|first1=R. İbrahim|title=The Christian Influences in Ismaili Thought|journal=The Journal of Iranian Studies|date=2023|volume=7|issue=1|pages=83–99|doi=10.33201/iranian.1199758|doi-access=free}}</ref> and other religious beliefs. The full Druze canon or Druze scripture (]) includes the ],<ref name=Nisan2002/> the ],<ref name=Nisan2002/> the ] and ] works by ] and those influenced by ] among works from other ] and ],<ref name=Nisan2002/> and adopted some Christian elements.<ref name="SmetTamīmī2007">{{cite book|author1=D. De Smet|author2=Ismāʻīl Tamīmī|author3=Ḥamzah ibn ʻAlī ibn Aḥmad|title=Les Epitres Sacrees Des Druzes Rasa'il Al-hikma: Introduction, Edition Critique Et Traduction Annotee Des Traites Attribues a Hamza B. 'ali Et Isma'il At-tamimi|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ixMLAQAAMAAJ|access-date=17 March 2011|year=2007|publisher=Peeters|isbn=978-90-429-1943-3}}</ref> The Druze faith shows influence of ], among other religious practices.<ref>{{cite book|title=Cultural Sociology of the Middle East, Asia, and Africa: An Encyclopedia|first=Andrea |last=L. Stanton|year= 2012| isbn=9781412981767| page =330|publisher=SAGE|quote=}}</ref><ref name="Mahmut 2023"/> Some scholars suggest that ] ] beliefs might have influenced Druze theology, particularly in concepts of ] and ].<ref name="Mahmut 2023"/> These influences and incorporations of Christian elements encompass the adoption of the concept of ] al-]'s persona among the Druze, as well as the integration of verses from the ] concerning the Messiah by certain Druze founders.<ref name="Mahmut 2023"/> | |||
In terms of religious comparison, ] do not believe in ] or the ], contrary to the beliefs of the Druze.<ref name=Nisan2002>{{Citation | title = Minorities in the Middle East: a history of struggle and self-expression | first =Mordechai | last = Nisan | edition= 2nd, illustrated | year=2002 | isbn=978-0-7864-1375-1|access-date=4 April 2012 | publisher = McFarland|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=keD9z1XWuNwC&pg=PA98|page=95}}</ref> Christianity teaches ], often through the establishment of ], unlike the Druze who do not accept converts to their faith. Marriage outside the Druze faith is rare and is strongly discouraged. Similarities between the Druze and Christians include commonalities in their view of ] ] and ], as well as belief in the ] and ].<ref name=Nisan2002/> | |||
] and ] in ]: Historically; the ] and the ] in the Shuf Mountains lived in complete harmony.<ref name="Hobby 1985 53"/>]] | |||
Christianity does not require male ], with ] teaching that the Christian ] of ] fulfills the Israelite practice of circumcision, both being signs and seals of the covenant of grace.<ref name="Clark2012">{{cite web |last1=Clark |first1=R. Scott |author-link=R. Scott Clark|title=Baptism and Circumcision According to Colossians 2:11–12 |url=https://heidelblog.net/2012/09/baptism-and-circumcision-according-to-colossians-211-12/ |publisher=The Heidelblog |access-date=24 December 2020 |language=English |date=17 September 2012}}</ref><ref name="Crowther1815">{{cite book|last=Crowther|first=Jonathan |title=A Portraiture of Methodism|year=1815|language=en|page=224}}</ref> Most mainstream Christian denominations currently maintain a neutral position on the practice of non-religious circumcision.<ref name="Marie2016">{{cite web |last1=Marie |first1=André |title=Circumcision: An Acceptable Practice? |url=https://catholicism.org/ad-rem-no-283.html |publisher=] |access-date=23 December 2020 |language=English |date=26 December 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Sicard |first1=Sigvard von |title=The Lutheran Church on the Coast of Tanzania 1887-1914: With Special Reference to the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Tanzania, Synod of Uzaramo-Uluguru |date=1970 |publisher=Gleerup |page=157 |language=English}}</ref> Male circumcision is commonly practiced in many predominantly ] and many Christian communities,<ref>{{cite book|title=The Female Circumcision Controversy: An Anthropological Perspective|first=Ellen|last= Gruenbaum|year= 2015| isbn= 9780812292510| page =61 |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press|quote= Christian theology generally interprets male circumcision to be an Old Testament rule that is no longer an obligation ... though in many countries (especially the United States and Sub-Saharan Africa, but not so much in Europe) it is widely practiced among Christians}}</ref> and in the ], the ] and the ] it is seen as a ].<ref>{{Cite book|last= Stearns|first=Peter N. |title=The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World|publisher=]|year=2008|isbn=9780195176322|page=179|quote=Uniformly practiced by Jews, Muslims, and the members of Coptic, Ethiopian, and Eritrean Orthodox Churches, male circumcision remains prevalent in many regions of the world, particularly Africa, South and East Asia, Oceania, and Anglosphere countries.}}</ref><ref name=WHO_2007_GTDPSA>{{cite web |title=Male circumcision: Global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety and acceptability |year=2007 |publisher=World Health Organization |url=http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/jc1360_male_circumcision_en_0.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222194858/http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/jc1360_male_circumcision_en_0.pdf |archive-date=2015-12-22 }}</ref><ref name=riggs_2006>{{cite book |author=Thomas Riggs |title=Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices: Religions and denominations |chapter=Christianity: Coptic Christianity |year=2006 |publisher=Thomson Gale |isbn=978-0-7876-6612-5 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uTMOAQAAMAAJ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160118224324/https://books.google.com/books?id=uTMOAQAAMAAJ |archive-date=2016-01-18 }}</ref><ref name=Columbia_encyc_2011_circ>{{cite encyclopedia |year=2011 |title=Circumcision |encyclopedia=Columbia Encyclopedia |publisher=Columbia University Press |url=http://www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/science/circumcision.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924051012/http://www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/science/circumcision.html |archive-date=2015-09-24 }}</ref><ref name=clark_2011>{{cite book |author=Clark M |title=Islam For Dummies |page=170 |date=10 March 2011 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-118-05396-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zPXu561ZpvgC&pg=PA178 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160118224324/https://books.google.com/books?id=zPXu561ZpvgC&pg=PA178 |archive-date=18 January 2016 }}</ref> While male ] is widely practiced by the Druze,<ref>{{cite book|title=The Druze and Their Faith in Tawhid| first=Anis|last=Ubayd|year= 2006| isbn=9780815630975| page =150|publisher=Syracuse University Press|quote=Male circumcision is standard practice, by tradition, among the Druze}}</ref> the procedure is practiced as a cultural tradition, and has no religious significance in the Druze faith.<ref>{{cite book|title=Israel and the Palestinian Territories: The Rough Guide| first=Daniel|last=Jacobs|year= 1998| isbn=9781858282480| page =147|publisher=Rough Guides|quote=Circumcision is not compulsory and has no religious significance.}}</ref> Some Druzes do not circumcise their male children, and refuse to observe this practice.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Sunni-Shi'a Divide: Islam's Internal Divisions and Their Global Consequences| first=Robert|last=Brenton Betts|year= 2013| isbn=9781612345239| page =56|publisher=Potomac Books, Inc.|quote=There are many references to the Druze refusal to observe this common Muslim practice, one of the earliest being the rediscoverer of the ruins of Petra, John Burckhardt. “The Druses do not circumcise their children}}</ref> | |||
Both faiths give a prominent place to ]:<ref name="Hitti 1928 37" /><ref name="Dana 2008 17" /> Jesus is the central figure of ], and in the ] faith, Jesus is considered an important prophet of God,<ref name="Hitti 1928 37">{{cite book|title=The Origins of the Druze People and Religion: With Extracts from Their Sacred Writings| first= Philip K.|last= Hitti|year= 1928| isbn= 9781465546623| page =37 |publisher=Library of Alexandria}}</ref><ref name="Dana 2008 17">{{cite book|title=The Druze in the Middle East: Their Faith, Leadership, Identity and Status| first= Nissim |last= Dana|year= 2008| isbn= 9781903900369| page =17 |publisher=Michigan University press}}</ref> being among the seven prophets who appeared in different periods of history.<ref>{{cite book|title=A Political and Economic Dictionary of the Middle East|year= 2013| isbn= 9781135355616|publisher=Routledge|quote= ...Druze believe in seven prophets: Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Muhammad, and Muhammad ibn Ismail ad-Darazi..}}</ref> The Druze revere Jesus "the son of ] and ]" and his ], who wrote the ].<ref name="Dana47">{{cite book|title=The Druze in the Middle East: Their Faith, Leadership, Identity and Status| first= Nissim |last= Dana|year= 2008| isbn= 978-1-903900-36-9| page =47 |publisher=Michigan University press}}</ref> According to the Druze manuscripts Jesus is the Greatest Imam and the incarnation of Ultimate ] (''Akl'') on earth and the first cosmic principle (''Hadd''),<ref name="Dana47" /><ref name="Louis">{{cite book|title=The Passion of Al-Hallaj, Mystic and Martyr of Islam, Volume 1: The Life of Al-Hallaj| first= Louis |last= Massignon|year= 2019| isbn= 9780691610832| page =594 |publisher=Princeton University Press}}</ref> and regards ] and ] as the incarnations of one of the five great celestial powers, who form part of their system.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought|first=Patricia|last= Crone|year= 2013| isbn=9780691134840| page =139|publisher=Princeton University Press|quote=}}</ref> In the Druze tradition, Jesus is known under three titles: the True Messiah (''al-Masih al-Haq''), the Messiah of all Nations (''Masih al-Umam''), and the Messiah of Sinners. This is due, respectively, to the belief that Jesus delivered the true Gospel message, the belief that he was the Saviour of all nations, and the belief that he offers forgiveness.<ref>{{cite book|title=The A to Z of the Druzes| first= Samy |last=Swayd|year= 2019| isbn=9780810870024| page =88 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|quote=Jesus is known in the Druze tradition as the "True Messiah" (al-Masih al-Haq), for he delivered what Druzes view as the true message. He is also referred to as the "Messiah of the Nations" (Masih al-Umam) because he was sent to the world as "Masih of Sins" because he is the one who forgives.}}</ref> | |||
Both religions venerate the ],<ref>{{cite book|title=The Culture of Sectarianism: Community, History, and Violence in Nineteenth-Century Ottoman Lebanon|first=Ussama|last=Makdisi|year=2000|isbn=978-0520218468|page =35|publisher=University of California Press|quote=}}</ref> ],<ref name="Swayd 2015 77">{{cite book|title=Historical Dictionary of the Druzes| first= Samy |last=Swayd|year= 2015| isbn= 978-1442246171| page =77 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield}}</ref> ],<ref>{{cite book|title=The Holy Land: An Oxford Archaeological Guide from Earliest Times to 1700| first= Jerome|last= Murphy-O'Connor|year= 2008| isbn= 9780191647666| page =205 |publisher=OUP Oxford}}</ref> ],<ref name="Swayd 2015 77"/> ],<ref name="S. Swayd 2009 109">{{cite book|title=The A to Z of the Druzes| first=Samy |last=S. Swayd|year= 2009| isbn= 9780810868366| page =109|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|quote=They also cover the lives and teachings of some biblical personages, such as Job, Jethro, Jesus, John, Luke, and others}}</ref> ],<ref name="Glenn2012">{{cite book|title=Sharing the Sacra: The Politics and Pragmatics of Intercommunal Relations Around Holy Places|first=Glenn|last= Bowman|year=2012|isbn=9780857454867|page=17|publisher=Berghahn Books}}</ref> ] and other common figures.<ref name="S. Swayd 2009 109"/> Figures in the ] such as ], ], ], and ] are considered important prophets of God in the Druze faith, being among the seven prophets who appeared in different periods of history.<ref name="Hitti 1928 37" /><ref name="Dana 2008 17" /> In the ], ] was ]' father-in-law, a ] shepherd and priest of ].<ref name ="Harris">], Understanding the Bible. Palo Alto: Mayfield. 1985.</ref> ] or Jethro of Midian is considered an ancestor of the Druze who revere him as their spiritual founder and chief prophet.<ref>{{cite book|title=A Political and Economic Dictionary of the Middle East|year= 2013| isbn= 9781135355616|publisher=Routledge|quote= }}</ref> | |||
Historians notes that the ] have historically maintained a ], as evidenced by shared traditions and social practices in ].<ref>{{cite book |title=Lebanon in History: From the Earliest Times to the Present|last=Hitti|first=Philip|year=2010|isbn=9789004129382|page=408-410|publisher=University of Michigan Press}}</ref><ref name="Mackey 2009 62">{{cite book|title=Lebanon: A House Divided|last=Mackey|first=Sandra|year=2006|isbn=9780393352764|page=62|publisher=W. W. Norton}}</ref> This interaction has led to overlapping symbols, customs, mutual veneration of saints and their shrines, and shared terminology for God.<ref name="Beaurepaire 2017 310-314">{{cite book|title=Religious Interactions in Europe and the Mediterranean World: Coexistence and Dialogue from the 12th to the 20th Centuries|first=Pierre-Yves|last=Beaurepaire|year=2017|isbn=9781351722179|pages=310–314|publisher=Taylor & Francis}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Munro|first1=Dane|last2=Haddad|first2=Nour Fara|title=Peace Journeys: A New Direction in Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage Research|year=2019|publisher=Cambridge Scholars Publishing|location=Cambridge|isbn=9781527543133|pages=7}}</ref> Sites such as the ] in ], historically a popular ] among the Druze, exemplify this cultural exchange.<ref>{{cite book|title=Sharing the Sacra: The Politics and Pragmatics of Intercommunal Relations Around Holy Places|first=Glenn|last= Bowman|year=2012|isbn=9780857454867|page=17|publisher=Berghahn Books}}</ref> The Druze also venerate Christian saints like ] and the ], admired for their "bravery and warrior-like qualities".<ref name="Beaurepaire 2017 310-314" /> Scholar Pierre-Yves Beaurepaire observes that these ] resonate with the Druze due to their parallels with Druze militarized traditions.<ref name="Beaurepaire 2017 310-314" /> | |||
==Relationship with Hinduism== | |||
{{see also|Hinduism and other religions#Christianity}} | |||
], ] and Christianity differ in their fundamental beliefs with regard to ], ] and ], to name a few. From the Hindu perspective, heaven (] '']'') and hell ('']'') are temporary places, where every ] has to live, either for the good deeds which they have done or for the ]s which they have committed. | |||
There are also significant similarities between Christian and Hindu theology, most notably, both religions present a trinitarian view of God. The Holy ] in Christianity, which consists of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, is sometimes seen as being roughly analogous to the ] in Hinduism, whose members—], ], and ]—are seen as the three principal manifestations of ], or Godhead. Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva are recognized as distinct deities as opposed to a singular being. | |||
Christian-Hindu relations are a mixed affair. On one hand, Hinduism's natural tendency has been to recognize the divine basis of various other religions, and to revere their founders and saintly practitioners. In Western countries, ] has influenced some Christian thinkers, while others in the anti-] movement have reacted against the activities of immigrant ] and their followers. (See also: ], ], ], ].) | |||
The ], a movement within ] in ], embraces ] and the teachings of the East, attempting to combine the Christian faith with the Hindu ] model and ] with the Hindu '']'' tradition.<ref>]</ref> ] is considered a syncretism of Hinduism with Protestantism or Lutheranism.<ref name="Natesan 1948 p. ">{{cite book | last=Natesan | first=G.A. | title=The Indian Review | publisher=G. A. Natesan & Company | issue=v. 49 | year=1948 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zJjDHHkTlbEC&q=%22protestant%22 | access-date=2023-03-01 | page=}}</ref><ref name="Bergunder Frese Schröder 2011 p. 319">{{cite book | last1=Bergunder | first1=M. | last2=Frese | first2=H. | last3=Schröder | first3=U. | title=Ritual, Caste, and Religion in Colonial South India | publisher=Primus Books | year=2011 | isbn=978-93-80607-21-4 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OcEM2IsnA1AC&pg=PA319 | access-date=2023-03-01 | page=319}}</ref><ref name="van Bijlert 2020 p. 188">{{cite book | last=van Bijlert | first=V.A. | title=Vedantic Hinduism in Colonial Bengal: Reformed Hinduism and Western Protestantism | publisher=Taylor & Francis | series=Routledge Studies in Religion | year=2020 | isbn=978-1-000-16997-3 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WS3tDwAAQBAJ&q=%22protestant+brahmoism%22&pg=PT188 | access-date=2023-03-01 | page=188}}</ref><ref name="Indian Institute of World Culture 1993 p. ">{{cite book | author=Indian Institute of World Culture | title=Transaction - Indian Institute of World Culture | issue=90 | year=1993 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LfELAQAAIAAJ&q=%22brahmo+samaj%22+%22lutheran+protestants%22 | access-date=2023-03-01 | page=}}</ref><ref name="The Court Journal: Court Circular & Fashionable Gazette 1833 p. 723">{{cite book | title=The Court Journal: Court Circular & Fashionable Gazette | publisher=Alabaster, Pasemore & sons, Limited | issue=v. 5 | year=1833 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qrYRAAAAYAAJ&dq=%22rammohun%22+%22was+a+lutheran+with%22&pg=PA723 | access-date=2023-03-01 | page=723}}</ref> | |||
==Relationship with Islam== | ==Relationship with Islam== | ||
{{See also|Christianity and Islam|Christian view of Muhammad|Christian influences in Islam}} | |||
] followed by ]]] | |||
] shares a number of beliefs with Christianity. They share similar views on ], heaven, hell, spirits, angels, and a ]. Jesus is acknowledged as a prophet by Muslims. However, while Islam relegates the man Jesus the Christ to a lesser status than God — "in the company of those nearest to God" in the ], mainstream (]) Christianity since the ] teaches without question the belief that Jesus is both fully man and fully ], one of the three ] (common English: persons) of Christianity's ], divinely co-equal and co-eternal with the ] and the ]. | |||
Both religions share the belief in the ],<ref>{{cite book|last=Robinson|first=Neal|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ht1hpisBQF0C&pg=PA12|title=Christ in Islam and Christianity|date=31 July 1991|publisher=State University of New York Press|isbn=978-0791405598|location=New York|page=12}}</ref> his ] and healings, and they also share the belief that he ]. However, Jesus is not accepted as the ] by Muslims, who strictly maintain the belief that he was a ] who was loved by God and exalted to the ranks of the most righteous by God. They believe that God is a single entity, and do not accept the first person in the Trinity as God as the vast majority of Christians do. Additionally, Muslims do not accept Jesus's literal ] and subsequent ]. Since Muslims believe in the worship of a strictly monotheistic form of ] who they do not believe ] in the Holy Trinity through Jesus Christ, they do not accept the use of ]s to worship God, which they consider ]. Muslim influence played a part in the initiation of ] and their conquests caused the ] in the ].<ref>{{cite book|title=A Study of History: Abridgement of volumes VII-X|first= Arnold Joseph |last=Toynbee|author-link=Arnold J. Toynbee| page=259 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oaPRQiPOfDoC&pg=PA259|isbn= 9780195050813 |year= 1987 |publisher= Oxford University Press}}</ref> For the same reason, they do not worship or pray to ], ], or any other prophets; they only pray to ]. | |||
Adherents of Islam have historically referred to themselves, Jews, and Christians (among others) as ] since they all base their religion on ] books that are considered to have a divine origin.<ref name=EI>{{Cite encyclopedia|author=Vajda, G | year= 2012 | title=Ahl al-Kitāb |encyclopedia=Encyclopaedia of Islam| edition=2nd|publisher=Brill |editor=P. Bearman |editor2=Th. Bianquis |editor3=C.E. Bosworth |editor4=E. van Donzel |editor5=W.P. Heinrichs|volume=1|page=264| doi= 10.1163/1573-3912_islam_SIM_0383 }}</ref> Christians, with the notable exception of ] adherents however, neither recognize the ] as a genuine book of divine revelation, nor agree with its lowly assessment of Jesus only as a prophet, on par with ], nor for that matter accept that Muhammad was a genuine prophet of God. In the 7th century text '']'', ] named ] as Christological ], referring to it as the "heresy of the Ishmaelites" (see '']'').<ref>{{cite book |last1=Griffith |first1=Sidney H. |title=The Church in the Shadow of the Mosque: Christians and Muslims in the World of Islam |date=April 4, 2010 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-14628-7 |page=41 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IwV2G-A-Oz0C&q=Islam+Christian+heresy+Damascus&pg=PA41}}</ref> The position has remained popular in Christian circles well into the 20th century, by theologians such as the Congregationalist cleric ] and the Roman Catholic historian ], the latter of who described it as "the great and enduring heresy of Mohammed."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Wismer |first1=Don |title=Routledge Revivals: The Islamic Jesus (1977): An Annotated Bibliography of Sources in English and French |publisher=Routledge |date=September 13, 2016 |quote=The old opinion of John of Damascus continues to persist among Christian orientalists. The author here replies to Frank Hugh Foster (see 233), who said that Islam is in fact heretical Christianity.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Murray |first1=Douglas |title=The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam |date=May 4, 2017 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing |isbn=978-1-4729-4222-7 |page=131 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dk6mDgAAQBAJ&q=the+great+and+enduring+heresy+of+Mohammed+belloc&pg=PA131}}</ref> | |||
Most Muslims, for their part, believe that parts of the Gospels, Torah and Jewish prophetic books have been forgotten, misinterpreted, or distorted by their followers. Based on that perspective, Muslims view the Qur'an as correcting the errors of traditional ]. For example, with the exception of ] and sometimes ], Muslims in general on an ] basis reject belief in the ] or any other expression of the divinity of Jesus as incompatible with monotheism. | |||
] and the ], ]]] | |||
Not surprisingly, the two faiths have often experienced mutual controversy and conflict (an example being the ], fought in response to Islamic conquests and attitudes to non-Muslims, in the near and Middle East). At the same time, much fruitful dialogue has occurred with the ] as well, especially since in the wake of the modernizing liberal reforms of ] regarding proper Catholic relations with many other major world religions. The writings of Catholic theologian ] frequently cite those of the Jewish philosopher ], as well as Muslim thinker ] ('Ibn-Rushd). | |||
On the other hand, the two faiths have experienced mutual peaceful coexistence, interaction, and cultural and sociala, and there was a cultural and human exchange between the ] and ]s. The ] is home to some of the world's most ],<ref>{{cite book|title=The Rowman & Littlefield Handbook of Christianity in the Middle East|first=Philip |last=Jenkins|year= 2020| isbn=9781538124185| page =XLVIII|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield}}</ref> and some of the most important cities of the ]—including three of its five great patriarchates (], ], and ]).<ref>{{cite book|title=The World's Christians: Who they are, Where they are, and How they got there| first1=Douglas |last1=Jacobsen|year= 2011| isbn=9781444397291|page =423|publisher=John Wiley & Sons}}</ref> Scholars and intellectuals agree ] to Arab and Islamic civilization since the introduction of ],<ref>Hill, Donald. ''Islamic Science and Engineering''. 1993. Edinburgh Univ. Press. {{ISBN|0-7486-0455-3}}, p. 4</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=The Legend of the Middle Ages|author=Brague, Rémi|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=c8YjEkLPXNYC|isbn=978-0-226-07080-3|page=164|year=2009|publisher=University of Chicago Press }}</ref> and they have had a significant impact contributing the culture of the ] and other areas.<ref>{{cite book|last=Pacini|first=Andrea|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KMfYAAAAMAAJ|title=Christian Communities in the Arab Middle East: The Challenge of the Future|publisher=Clarendon Press|year=1998|isbn=978-0-19-829388-0|pages=38, 55|access-date=21 October 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210310101859/https://books.google.com/books?id=KMfYAAAAMAAJ|archive-date=10 March 2021|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Jews, Antisemitism, and the Middle East|first=Kail|last= C. Ellis|year= 2017| isbn=9781351510721| page =173|publisher=Routledge}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Secular Nationalism and Citizenship in Muslim Countries: Arab Christians in the Levant|first=Michael |last=Curtis|year= 2018| isbn=9781351510721| page =11|publisher=Springer|quote=Christian contributions to art, culture, and literature in the Arab-Islamic world; Christian contributions education and social advancement in the region.}}</ref> ] estimates indicate that in 2010, more than 64 million ] lived in countries with Muslim majorities (excluding ]). The Pew Forum study finds that ] (21.1 million) has the largest Christian population in the ], followed by ], ] and ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2011/12/Christianity-fullreport-web.pdf|title=Global Christianity – A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World's Christian Population|publisher=Pew Research Center|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190801204254/https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2011/12/Christianity-fullreport-web.pdf|archive-date=1 August 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
On May 6, 2001 ], the first pope to pray in a ], delivered an address at ] in ], saying: "It is important that Muslims and Christians continue to explore philosophical and theological questions together, in order to come to a more objective and comprehensive knowledge of each other's religious beliefs. Better mutual understanding will surely lead, at the practical level, to a new way of presenting our two religions not in opposition, as has happened too often in the past, but in partnership for the good of the human family." This Mosque of Damascus is famous for containing the head of ]. | |||
==Relationship with Judaism== | |||
{{See also|Antisemitism in Christianity|Christianity and Judaism|Judeo-Christian|Responsibility for the death of Jesus}} The relationship between Christianity and ] has been strained. In the past, Christians were often taught that "], for whose "murder" they bear a ] (an interpretation which most major ] now reject). Meanwhile, Jews have tended to associate Christianity with various ]s, or in better times, they have tended to associate it with the dangers of ]. ] has a long history in Christianity (see ]), and it is far from dead (for example, it exists in ]). However, since the ], much dialogue which is aimed at ] has taken place, and relations between Jews and Christians have greatly improved. Today, many conservative evangelicals support ], much to the irritation of ], partly based on the ] belief that the modern state of ] represents the fulfillment of ]. | |||
According to ], most scholars agree that Jews and Christians in Latin ] lived in relative peace with one another until the 13th century.<ref>{{cite book|editor1-last=Abulafia|editor1-first=Anna Sapir|title=Religious Violence Between Christians and Jews: Medieval Roots, Modern Perspectives|publisher=Palgrave|location=UK|year=2002|isbn=978-1-34942-499-3}}</ref>{{rp|xii}}<ref>{{cite book|last=Bachrach|first=Bernard S.|title=Early medieval Jewish policy in Western Europe| publisher=University of Minnesota Press| location=Minneapolis| year=1977| isbn=0-8166-0814-8}}</ref>{{rp|3}} {{lang|la|]}} (the "Constitution for the Jews") was the official position of the papacy regarding Jews throughout the Middle Ages and later.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Paula |last=Fredriksen |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/600873 |title=Review: Revisiting Augustine's Doctrine of Jewish Witness |journal=The Journal of Religion |volume=89 |issue=4 |pages=564–578 |date=October 2009 |jstor= 10.1086/600873|doi= 10.1086/600873|s2cid=170403439 }}</ref> The first ] was issued in about 1120 by ], intended to protect Jews who suffered during the ], and was reaffirmed by many popes, even until the 15th century although they were not always strictly upheld. The bull forbade, besides other things, Christians from coercing Jews to convert, or to harm them, or to take their property, or to disturb the celebration of their festivals, or to interfere with their cemeteries, on pain of excommunication.<ref name="BaskinSeeskin2010">{{cite book|last1=Baskin|first1=Judith R.|last2=Seeskin|first2=Kenneth|title=The Cambridge Guide to Jewish History, Religion, and Culture|date=12 July 2010|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=9780521869607|page=120}}</ref> | |||
The phenomenon of ] has become something of an irritant to Jewish / Christian relations{{Citation needed|date=December 2008}}. Messianic Jews—who generally seek to combine a Jewish identity with the recognition of Jesus—are rejected by mainstream Jewish groups{{Citation needed|date=December 2008}}, who dismiss Messianic Judaism as little more than Christianity with Jewish undertones. | |||
The Jewish conception of the ] (משיח ''mashiach'' in Hebrew) holds certain similarities to that of Christians, yet there are substantial differences. According to ]s, the ] contain a small number of prophecies concerning a future descendant of King ], who will be anointed (Hebrew: moshiach) as the Jewish people's new leader and will establish the throne of David in Jerusalem forever. In the Jewish view, this fully human and mortal leader will rebuild the land of ] and restore the Davidic Kingdom. This subject is covered in the section on ]. Some Christians have a different understanding of the term ''messiah'', and believe that Jesus is the messiah referred to in the ] prophecies; that the kingdom in these prophecies was to be a ], not an earthly one; and that Jesus' words and actions in the New Testament provide evidence of his identity as messiah and that the remainder of ] will be fulfilled in the ]. Other Christians acknowledge the Jewish definition of ''messiah'', and hold that Jesus fulfills this, being 'fully man' (in addition to being 'fully God'), and believe that the Second Coming will establish the Kingdom of God on earth, where Jesus, as messiah and descendant from David, will reign from Jerusalem. | |||
==Relationship with Mithraism and Sol Invictus== | |||
<!-- {{Contradict|section|about=whether or not Mithraism was known about before 100AD|date=March 2009}} There can be many arguments about a thing which does not make them contradictions because they are just that; arguments. Please see discussion page.--> | |||
There are many parallels between ], the religion of ], and Christianity. ] is believed to have established the ''Dies Natalis Solis Invicti'' (Day of the Birth of Sol Invictus) as an annual festival{{Citation needed|date=July 2009}} held on the day when the sun's daily ] visibly starts rising again after the ], namely on December 25; the birth of the central figure was thus celebrated on the day which Christians later used to celebrate Jesus' birth (having always celebrated this on ]).<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110724173601/http://www.navidadlatina.com/historia/|date=2011-07-24}} </ref> Other similarities include the stories of Christ and Mithra as children being visited by shepherds, the ], and the immortal soul{{Citation needed|date=July 2009}}. Sunday itself was imposed as the official day of rest by ], who referred to it as the ''Day of the venerable Sun''{{Citation needed|date=July 2009}}. (Although Christians worshiped on Sunday from at least 150 years before Constantine)<ref>Justin Martyr, ''First Apology'', 67.3</ref> | |||
The earliest attestation of Mithraism is ]'s record of it being practised in 68BC by ], the first mithraists.<ref>Plutarch, '''', 24.5</ref> ], a Christian writer who lived between the 2nd and 3rd centuries, admitted there was a strong similarity between the practises of the two faiths: | |||
:''the devil, ... mimics even the essential portions of the divine sacraments...he baptises some, that is his own believers, ... he promises the forgiveness of sins... Mithraism, .... also celebrates the ] of bread, and introduces a symbol of the resurrection...'' - Tertullian,<ref>'']'', 40</ref> | |||
], an earlier 2nd century ], agreed that the similarities existed, claiming that Mithraism had copied the ].<ref name="First Apology">, 66.4</ref> Justin argued that the devil had invented Mithraism to mock Christianity.<ref name="First Apology"/> Christian apologist ] stated: | |||
:''allegations of an early Christian dependence on Mithraism have been rejected on many grounds. Mithraism had no concept of the death and resurrection of its god and no place for any concept of rebirth -- at least during its early stages...During the early stages of the cult, the notion of rebirth would have been foreign to its basic outlook...Moreover, Mithraism was basically a military cult. Therefore, one must be skeptical about suggestions that it appealed to nonmilitary people like the early Christians''.<ref>R. Nash, ''Christianity and the Hellenistic World'' as quoted in Baker's Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics, Norman Geisler; Baker Books, Grand Rapids, Mich.; 1999, p. 492.</ref> | |||
==Relationship with Paganism== | |||
{{Main|Christianity and paganism}} | |||
==Relationship with Scientology== | |||
{{See also|Jesus in Scientology}} | |||
In the 2008 book ''Vintage Jesus: Timeless Answers to Timely Questions'', authors Mark Driscoll and Gerry Breshears write: "According to Scientology, Jesus is an "implant" forced upon a Thetan about a million years ago",<ref name="driscoll">{{cite book | last =Driscoll | first =Mark | author2 =Gerry Breshears | title =Vintage Jesus: Timeless Answers to Timely Questions | publisher =Good News Publishers | year =2008 | pages = | isbn =978-1-58134-975-7 | url =https://archive.org/details/vintagejesustime0000dris/page/14 }}</ref> and Jack Huberman writes in ''101 People Who Are Really Screwing America'' that in Scientology Jesus is seen as having been "implanted in humanity's collective memory", by the character ] from ].<ref>{{cite book | last =Huberman | first =Jack | title =101 People Who Are Really Screwing America | publisher =Nation Books | year =2006 | pages = | isbn =978-1-56025-875-9 | url =https://archive.org/details/101peoplewhoarer00hube/page/51 }}</ref> | |||
Professor Paul Blankenship of the ] studied Scientology and commented on this view, saying "They do not do a lot of talking about God or Jesus. It's more getting your mind cleared, and I could see how they could say that that could be compatible. Scientology has not really developed into a complete religious tradition. They may very well develop."<ref name="dries">{{cite news | last =Dries | first =Bill | title =Scientology May Fit In, Say Local Religious Leaders | work =] | page =A1 | date =September 4, 1997 }}</ref> | |||
The Church of Scientology claims that their belief system is different from Christianity because it is based “solely on reason” and that its members “possess a practical system of ethics and justice.” The church likewise claims that “anything religious teachers said or Buddha promised, even the visions of Christianity, are attained in Scientology as a result.” Muck, Netland and McDermott emphasize that this clearly shows that Scientology is incompatible with Christianity.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Muck |first1=Terry C. |last2=Netland |first2=Harold A. |last3=McDermott |first3=Gerald R. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ry_aBAAAQBAJ&q=scientology+religion&pg=PT661 |title=Handbook of Religion: A Christian Engagement with Traditions, Teachings, and Practices |publisher=Baker Academic |year=2014 |isbn=9781441246004 |access-date=2016-06-15 }}</ref> | |||
In the book ''New Religions and the Theological Imagination in America'' (1995) by Mary Farrell Bednarowski, the author comments that "In the game of life as Scientology understands it, sin does not call for repentance as much as it does the eradication of error, and that must come through the technology, the auditing process, sometimes referred to as pastoral counseling. In fact, in regard to getting rid of sin, Scientology sees parallels between the goals of its technology and Jesus's saving action."<ref name="bednarowski">{{cite book | last =Bednarowski | first =Mary Farrell | title = New Religions and the Theological Imagination in America | publisher =Indiana University Press | year =1995 | page =61 | isbn =0-253-20952-8 }}</ref> Bednarowski quotes from the Scientology publication ''The Scientology Catechism'' in noting these parallels between the stated mission of Scientologists and the teachings imparted by Christ to his disciples.<ref name="bednarowski" /> She notes that Scientology founder ] is not regarded in Scientology as a "divine savior", but rather a "loved friend and teacher".<ref name="bednarowski" /> Writing in ''Signs of the Times: The New Religious Movements in Theological Perspective'' (1996), ] cites Mary Bednarowski, and goes on to note "Helle Medgaard asserts that Scientology also misunderstands Jesus and repudiates the key Christian doctrine of the forgiveness of sins."<ref name="saliba">{{cite book | last1 =Saliba | first1 =John A | author-link = John A. Saliba | last2 = Centre d'information sur les nouvelles religions | title =Signs of the Times: The New Religious Movements in Theological Perspective | publisher =Médiaspaul | year =1996 | location =Montreal | page =32 | isbn = 9782894203262| oclc =35886835 }}</ref> In his book ''The Sociology of Religious Movements'' (1996), ] cites the research of ], in noting "Scientology ... has no discernible connection to Christianity".<ref>{{cite book | last =Bainbridge | first =William Sims | title =The Sociology of Religious Movements | publisher =Routledge | year =1996 | page =411 (1997 edition) | isbn = 0-415-91202-4}}</ref> | |||
==Possible relationship with Zoroastrianism through Judaism== | |||
] shares a number of beliefs with Christianity. They both share similar views on monotheism, judgment, heaven, hell, spirits, angels, and a future resurrection. Christ is acknowledged and respected by Muslims as a great and sinless prophet to whom are ascribed titles such as ''Messiah'' and the ''Spirit of God''. However, while Islam relegates Christ to a lesser status than God — "In the company of those nearest to Allah" in the ], mainstream Christianity believes quite firmly and without question that Christ is God, one of the three ''hypostases'' (persons) of Christianity's ], equally God as are the Father and the ]. | |||
<!-- This section has been discussed at great length on the talk page and a vote & consensus was reached; please do not edit before reviewing the discussions and talking with the community...thanks --> | |||
Many scholars<ref>''Zoroastrianism: A Shadowy but Powerful Presence in the Judaeo-Christian World'', Mary Boyce, London, 1987, and ''Encyclopedia Americana'', Danbury, Connecticut, 1988, vol 29, pp. 813–815, article by J. Duchesne-Guillemin.</ref> believe that the ] of ] and the idea of ] as a whole possibly originated in ], and it may have been transferred to Judaism during the ], and it eventually influenced Christian theology. Bible scholar P.R. Ackroyd states: "the whole eschatological scheme, however, of the Last Judgment, rewards and punishments, etc., within which immortality is achieved, is manifestly Zoroastrian in origin and inspiration."<ref>'']'', ] and H.H. Rowley, ed., Revised edition, Nelson, New York, 1982, section 607b</ref> However, the theory is questioned by other mainstream historians and scholars. ''The Oxford History of the Biblical World'' states "There is little if any effect of Zoroastrian elements on Judaism in the Persian period."<ref>''The Oxford History of the Biblical World'', M. Coogan, ed., 1998.</ref> Nevertheless, scholars such as Soloman Nigosian contend, in regarding the similar ideas of Zoroaster and later Jewish writers, that "the ideas were indigenous to Iran...it is hardly conceivable that some of the characteristic ideas and practices in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam came into being without Zoroastrian influence."<ref>S. A. Nigosian, ''The Zoroastrian Faith'', 97</ref> The new faith (Zoroastrianism) emerged in larger Persian empires. " Zoroastrianism reflected the cosmopolitan society of the empires". During this time Zoroastrianism profoundly effected the beliefs and values of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam ("Traditions & Encounters: A brief global History", Jerry H. Bentley. pg. 93). It is also possible that Zoroastrianism and later Jewish theology came from a common source. | |||
''For more on this theory, see ], ], and ].'' | |||
The religions both share a belief in Christ's ], his miracles and healings, and that he ascended bodily into heaven. However, Christ is not accepted as the Person of the Son within the Trinity by Muslims (except in the sense of being someone loved by God). They believe only in God as a single entity, not as the Trinity accepted by the vast majority of Christians. Neither do Muslims accept Christ's ]. Since Muslims believe only in the worship of a strictly monotheistic God who never assumed human flesh, they do not accept the use of ], seeing this as ]. Muslims were the first instigators of ]. For the same reason, they do not worship or pray to the ], ], or any other prophets; only to ]. | |||
In the Younger ], three divinities of the Zoroastrian pantheon are repeatedly identified as ahuric, meaning that each, as ], act together in both representing and protecting ], or the divine truth governing the universe. These three are ], ] and ], and hence known as the "Ahuric triad." Similarities with the Christian Trinity can be seen between Ahura Mazda and God the Father, Mithra and Christ the Logos, as well as between Burz and the Holy Spirit, both of which are associated symbolically with water. Both Zoroastrianism and Christianity consider themselves to be monotheistic, but like all other monotheisms they have highlighted certain aspects or energies of the divine to emphasize, and these are not meant to be interpreted as separate divinities. In both religions there are guardian ], or ], which are considered to be created beings and are distinct from the ] or divine emanations. The Zoroastrian term ], however, has variously been interpreted as meaning emanations or "sparks" of the divine, or as being roughly synonymous with the term "angels." There have been various theories on the possible relationship between these aspects of Zoroastrianism and ideas of divine emanation in ], Jewish ], Islamic mysticism (]), and other religious systems, such as ], ], and the ], among others. | |||
==Relationship with the Bahá'í Faith== | |||
==Sociological aspects== | |||
The ] has a strong basis in ] and recognizes the ], which include ], as messengers of God. Interpretations vary, but Bahá'í is sometimes considered an ]. Although followers of Bahá'í believe in God, as do Christians, they reject the ] and divinity of Jesus, but do recognize some of his teachings. Bahá'ís views prophets with both human and divine characteristics but not themselves God. They see them as a "divine manifestations." | |||
{{unreferenced section|date=April 2021}} | |||
The spread of Christianity has been international, and in some cases it has entirely displaced the religions of those people who it was proselytized to and it has also altered their customs. At times, this centuries-long process has been met with violent opposition, and likewise, the spread of Christianity has been carried out with martial force in some cases. To some extent, the relationship between Christianity and other faiths has been encumbered by this history, and modern Christians, particularly in the West, have expressed embarrassment over the violence which existed in Christianity's past. | |||
] is widely accepted within Christianity. Many Christian organizations believe that they have a duty to make converts among every people. In recent years, ] and dialogue between different religions has been endorsed by many official representatives of the Christian churches, as a way of effecting reconciliation between Christian people and people of other faiths, leading to many cases of reconciliation. In some cases, this endorsement is accompanied by a complete disavowal of all proselytizing efforts under the banner of ]. | |||
Bahá'í shares some views with Christianity regarding moral and immoral behavior. Although the views of ] about homosexuality vary, Bahá'í, like mainstream Christianity, forbids ] and ]. ] is also forbidden. | |||
This is specially marked by the inauguration, or installation, of Archbishop of York Dr ] from Uganda, on November 29, 2005. Dr Sentamu is the first black African archbishop of the Church of England. He is also the first archbishop to beat bongo drums in the cathedral at his own inauguration. The newspaper Guardian, which dedicated the double middle page of the following day's issue to a full picture of the grinning archbishop in full apparel at the porch of the cathedral, said that: | |||
==Relations with other faiths== | |||
"Dr Sentamu's sermon was a stern lecture to the Church of England to grow out of being a 'judgmental and moralising' congregation of 'pew-fillers, sermon-taters, Bible readers, even born-again believers and Spirit-filled charismatics' and go out to make friends in the world. 'We have lost the joy and power that makes real disciples and we've become consumers of religion, not disciples of Jesus-Christ', he said. 'Christians, go and make friends among Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, Muslims, Sikhs, agnostics, atheists, not for the purpose of converting them to your beliefs but for friendship, understanding, listening, hearing.' His remarks were greeted with applause, not with silence as the order of the service instructed." | |||
A special case is the issue of ], in which significant reconciliation has been reached. | |||
The spread of Christianity has been international, in some cases entirely displacing the religions and altering the customs encountered among those people to whom it has come. This centuries-long process has been met with violent opposition at times, and likewise the spread of Christianity has in some cases been carried out with martial force. The relationship of Christianity to other faiths is encumbered to some extent by this history, with modern Christians, particularly in the West, expressing embarrassment over the violence in Christianity's past. While military conquest for the spread of Christianity per se has been disavowed by nearly all branches of Christianity in modern times;. | |||
===Syncretism=== | |||
Converting adherents of other religions, without martial force, is widely accepted within Christianity. Many Christian organizations believe that they have a duty to make converts among every people. In recent years, ] and dialogue between different religions has been endorsed by many official representatives of the Christian churches, as a way of effecting reconciliation between Christian people and people of other faiths, leading to many cases of reconciliation. In some cases, this endorsement is accompanied by a complete disavowal of all proselytizing efforts under the banner of ]. | |||
{{main|Christian syncretism}} | |||
Christian converts have often carried some of their former customs into their new faith. On occasion, this has led to ]s, that are often not accepted by mainstream Christians: | |||
*In ]n ], the ]n ]s are venerated in the shape of Catholic saints. | |||
*The Chinese ] replaced the Bible with the ]. | |||
*The ] of ] mixed ] traditions with Protestantism. | |||
*The Vietnamese syncretic religion ] locates Jesus in the celestial Council of Great Spirits that directs the universe.<ref name="Blagov">{{cite book |last1=Blagov |first1=Serguei A. |title=Caodaism: Vietnamese Traditionalism and Its Leap Into Modernity |date=2001 |publisher=Nova Publishers |isbn=978-1-59033-150-7 |page=53 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fzKjJndNTjIC&q=jesus&pg=PA40 |access-date=3 March 2021 |language=en |chapter=5: Caodaist Hierarchy and Ritials }}</ref> It also has a pope with an elaborate hierarchy and its temples are influenced by Catholic churches. | |||
*The ] of Central America acknowledge Äkyantho', the god of foreigners. He has a son named Hesuklistos (Jesus Christ) who is supposed to be the god of the foreigners. They recognize that Hesuklistos is a god but do not feel he is worthy of worship as he is a minor god.<ref name="Mc1">McGee, Jon (2002) "Watching Lacandon Maya Lives," Boston: Allyn and Bacon.</ref> | |||
==See also== | |||
A special case is the issue of ], in which significant reconciliation has been reached. | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
== |
==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
== |
==Further reading== | ||
*{{cite book|last= Ankerl |first= Guy |title= Global communication without universal civilization |orig-year= 2000 |series= INU societal research |volume= 1: Coexisting contemporary civilizations : Arabo-Muslim, Bharati, Chinese, and Western |publisher= INU Press |location= Geneva |isbn= 978-2-88155-004-1 |year= 2000 }} | |||
#{{note|ZoroastrianismScholars}} See ''Zoroastrianism: A Shadowy but Powerful Presence in the Judaeo-Christian World'', Mary Boyce, London, 1987, ''Peake's Commentary on the Bible'', Matthew Black and H.H. Rowley, ed., Revised edition, Nelson, New York, 1982, section 607b, and ''Encyclopedia Americana'', Danbury, CT, 1988, vol 29, pp. 813-815, article by J. Duchesne-Guillemin. | |||
*Ingham, Michael, Bp. (1997). ''Mansions of the Spirit: the Gospel in a Multi-Faith World''. Toronto, Ont.: Anglican Book Centre. {{ISBN|1-55126-185-5}} | |||
- #{{note|Boyce}} Boyce, Mary. ''Zoroastrians: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices'', Routledge, London, 1979, p. 1. | |||
*Zuckermann, Ghil'ad . "'] ]' and the Power of 'Lexical Engineering' in ], ] and ]. A Socio-Philo(sopho)logical Perspective", ''Explorations in the Sociology of ] and ]'', edited by Tope Omoniyi and Joshua A. Fishman, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 237–258. {{ISBN|90-272-2710-1}} | |||
- #{{note|KingMoore}} C. W. King, ''Gnostics and their Remains Ancient and Mediaeval'' page? | |||
- #{{note|Yamauchi}} Yamauchi, Edwin. ''Persia and the Bible'' (Baker, 1990) p. 461. | |||
- #{{note|Zaehner}} Zaehner, R.C. ''The Dawn and Twilight of Zoroastrianism''. G.P. Putnam's Sons, New York, 1961, pp.57-58. | |||
- #{{note|OxfordHistoryOnZoroastrianism}} ''The Oxford History of the Biblical World'', M. Coogan, ed., 1998. | |||
{{Christianity footer}} | |||
#{{note|carm}} , ''Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry''. Retrieved July 17, 2005. | |||
#{{note|Nash}} R. Nash, ''Christianity and the Hellenistic World'' as quoted in Baker's Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics, Norman Geisler; Baker Books, Grand Rapids, Mich.; 1999, p. 492. | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Christianity And Other Religions}} | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 19:06, 9 December 2024
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Part of a series on | ||||
Christianity | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
Theology | ||||
|
||||
Related topics | ||||
Christianity and other religions documents Christianity's relationship with other world religions, and the differences and similarities.
Christian groups
See also: Catholic–Protestant relations and Catholic–Eastern Orthodox relationsChristian views on religious pluralism
Western Christian views
Some Christians have argued that religious pluralism is an invalid or a self-contradictory concept. Maximal forms of religious pluralism claim that all religions are equally true, or they claim that one religion can be true for some people and another religion can be true for others. Some Christians hold the view that such pluralism is logically impossible. Catholicism believes that while it is the fullest and most complete revelation of God to man, other Christian denominations have also received genuine revelation from God.
Although Calvinists believe that God and the truth of God cannot be plural, they also believe that those civil ordinances of man which restrain man from doing evil and encourage man to do good, are ordinances of God (regardless of the religion, or the lack of it, of those who wield that power). Christians are obligated to be at peace with all men, as far as it is up to them, and they are also obligated to submit to governments for the Lord's sake, and pray for their enemies. Calvinism is not pacifistic, and as a result, Calvinists have been involved in religious wars, most notably, they were involved in the French Wars of Religion and the English Civil War. Some of the first parts of modern Europe where religious tolerance was practiced had Calvinistic populations, most notably the Netherlands.
Evangelical Christians believe that religious pluralism is heresy and contradicts the Bible.
Eastern Orthodox views
See also: Eastern Orthodoxy and JudaismModern (post-Enlightenment) Christian views
This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
In recent years, some Christian groups have become more open to religious pluralism; this has led to many cases of reconciliation between Christians and people of other faiths. The liberalization of many seminaries and theological institutions, particularly in regards to the rejection of the notion that the Bible is an infallible document, has led to a much more human-centered and secular movement within Mainline Christian denominations, particularly in the United States. Some Mainline churches no longer hold to exclusivist views on salvation.
In recent years there has been much to note in the way of reconciliation between some Christian groups and the Jewish people. Many modern day Christians, including many Catholics and some liberal Protestants, have developed a view of the New Testament as an extended covenant; they believe that Jews are still in a valid relationship with God, and that Jews can avoid damnation and earn a heavenly reward. For these Christians, the New Testament extended God's original covenant to cover non-Jews. The article Christian–Jewish reconciliation deals with this issue in detail.
Multiple smaller Christian groups in the US and Canada have come into being over the last 40 years, such as "Christians for Israel." Their website says that they exist in order to "expand Christian-Jewish dialogue in the broadest sense in order to improve the relationship between Christians and Jews, but also between Church and Synagogue, emphasizing Christian repentance, the purging of anti-Jewish preliminary attitudes and the false 'Replacement' theology rampant throughout Christian teachings."
A number of large Christian groups, including the Catholic Church and several large Protestant churches, have publicly declared that they will no longer proselytize Jews.
Other Modern Christian views, including some conservative Protestants, reject the idea of the New Testament as an extended covenant, and retain the classical Christian view as described earlier.
Modern views specific to Catholicism
Main article: Catholic Church and ecumenismFor the Catholic Church, there has been a move at reconciliation not only with Judaism, but also Islam. The Second Vatican Council states that salvation includes others who acknowledge the same creator, and explicitly lists Muslims among those (using the term Mohammedans, which was the word commonly used among non-Muslims at the time). The official Catholic position is therefore that Jews, Muslims and Christians (including churches outside of Rome's authority) all acknowledge the same God, though Jews and Muslims have not yet received the gospel while other churches are generally considered deviant to a greater or lesser degree.
The most prominent event in the way of dialogue between religions has arguably been the 1986 Peace Prayer in Assisi, to which Pope John Paul II, against considerable resistance also from within the Roman Catholic church, invited representatives of all world religions. John Paul II’s remarks regarding Christian denominations were found in his Ut unum sint address. This initiative was taken up by the Community of Sant'Egidio, who, with the support of John Paul II, organized yearly peace meetings of religious representatives. These meetings, consisting of round tables on different issues and of a common time of prayer, have done much to further understanding and friendship between religious leaders and to further concrete peace initiatives. In order to avoid the reproaches of syncretism that were leveled at the 1986 Assisi meeting where the representatives of all religions held one common prayer, the follow-up meetings saw the representatives of the different religions pray in different places according to their respective traditions.
The question of whether traditional Chinese ancestor veneration, consists of worshipping a God or veneration of a saint was important to the Roman Catholic church during the Chinese Rites controversy of the early 18th century. This dispute was between the Dominicans who argued that Confucianism and Chinese folk religion was worship, and therefore incompatible with Catholicism, and the Jesuit who argued the reverse. The pope ultimately ruled in favor of the Dominicans, a decision which greatly reduced the role of Catholic missionaries in China. However, this decision was partially reversed by Pope Pius XII in 1939; after this, Chinese customs were no longer considered superstition or idolatry, but a way of honoring esteemed relatives (not entirely dissimilar to the Catholic practice of praying for the dead).
Relationship with the Baháʼí Faith
The Baháʼí Faith believes that there is one God who sends divine messengers to guide humanity throughout time, which is called Progressive revelation (Baháʼí)—and is different from the Christian belief of Progressive revelation (Christian). They believe in the divine knowledge and essence of Jesus, among other messengers such as Muhammad, Zoroaster, Moses, Buddha, Krishna, and others. Interpretations vary, but the Baháʼí Faith is sometimes considered an Abrahamic faith. The followers of the Baháʼí Faith believe in God, as do Christians, and recognize Jesus' teachings, but they have different views of the Trinity and divinity of Jesus. The Baháʼí view of prophets is that although they have both human and divine characteristics, they are not themselves God, but rather "divine manifestations." They also see the Trinity as symbolic where Jesus and the Holy Spirit are polished mirrors that reflect the pure light from God. Although Baháʼís affirm the Bible as sacred scripture, they do not consider the Bible to be wholly authentic as Shoghi Effendi, the Guardian of the Baháʼí Faith, affirmed that "The Bible is not wholly authentic, and in this respect not to be compared with the Qur’án, and should be wholly subordinated to the authentic Sayings of Bahá’u’lláh."
Baháʼís share some views with Christianity regarding moral and immoral behavior. Baháʼís condemn polygamy, premarital sex, and homosexual acts while treating everyone, including homosexuals, with love, respect, and dignity.
Relationship with Buddhism
Main article: Buddhism and ChristianityIn the 19th century, some scholars began to perceive similarities between Buddhist and Christian practices. For example, in 1878, T.W. Rhys Davids wrote that the earliest missionaries to Tibet observed that similarities have been seen in Christianity and Buddhism since the first known contact was made between adherents of the two religions. In 1880 Ernest De Bunsen made similar observations and noted that except for the death of Jesus on the cross, and the Christian doctrine of atonement, the most ancient Buddhist records noted that similarities existed between Buddhist and Christian traditions.
Buddhism and Protestantism came into political conflict in 19th century Sri Lanka and Tibet c. 1904 (the Francis Younghusband Expedition). Various individuals and organizations have helped introduce various strains of Buddhist theology and meditation to several generations of Western spiritual seekers (including some Catholic religious). Relations between both religions are generally good, except in South Korea where Christians have damaged Buddhist temples and engaged in other forms of Christian extremism. The Russian republic of Kalmykia recognizes Tibetan/Lamaist Buddhism and Russian Orthodoxy as its official religions.
Relationship with Druze
Main article: Christianity and DruzeChristianity and Druze are Abrahamic religions that share a historical traditional connection with some major theological differences. The two faiths share a common place of origin in the Middle East, and consider themselves to be monotheistic. The relationship between the Druze and Christians has been characterized by harmony and peaceful coexistence, with amicable relations between the two groups prevailing throughout history, with the exception of some periods, including 1860 Mount Lebanon civil war. Conversion of Druze to Christianity used to be common practice in the Levant region. Over the centuries, several prominent members of the Druze community have embraced Christianity, including some of Shihab dynasty members, as well as the Abi-Lamma clan.
Christian and Druze communities share a long history of interaction dating back roughly a millennium, particularly in Mount Lebanon. Interaction between Christian communities (Maronites, Eastern Orthodox, Melkite Catholic, and others) and the Unitarian Druze, led to the presence of mixed villages and towns in Mount Lebanon, Chouf, Wadi al-Taym, Jabal al-Druze, the Galilee region, Mount Carmel, and Golan Heights. The Maronite Catholics and the Druze founded modern Lebanon in the early eighteenth century, through a governing and social system known as the "Maronite-Druze dualism" in the Mount Lebanon Mutasarrifate.
Druze doctrine teaches that Christianity is to be "esteemed and praised" as the Gospel writers are regarded as "carriers of wisdom". The Druze faith incorporates some elements of Christianity, and other religious beliefs. The full Druze canon or Druze scripture (Epistles of Wisdom) includes the Old Testament, the New Testament, the Quran and philosophical works by Plato and those influenced by Socrates among works from other religions and philosophers, and adopted some Christian elements. The Druze faith shows influence of Christian monasticism, among other religious practices. Some scholars suggest that early Christian Gnostic beliefs might have influenced Druze theology, particularly in concepts of divine knowledge and reincarnation. These influences and incorporations of Christian elements encompass the adoption of the concept of Christianizing al-Mahdi's persona among the Druze, as well as the integration of verses from the Bible concerning the Messiah by certain Druze founders.
In terms of religious comparison, mainstream Christian denominations do not believe in reincarnation or the transmigration of the soul, contrary to the beliefs of the Druze. Christianity teaches evangelism, often through the establishment of missions, unlike the Druze who do not accept converts to their faith. Marriage outside the Druze faith is rare and is strongly discouraged. Similarities between the Druze and Christians include commonalities in their view of monogamous marriage and divorce, as well as belief in the oneness of God and theophany.
Christianity does not require male circumcision, with covenant theology teaching that the Christian sacrament of baptism fulfills the Israelite practice of circumcision, both being signs and seals of the covenant of grace. Most mainstream Christian denominations currently maintain a neutral position on the practice of non-religious circumcision. Male circumcision is commonly practiced in many predominantly Christian countries and many Christian communities, and in the Coptic Orthodox Church, the Ethiopian Orthodox Church and the Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Church it is seen as a rite of passage. While male Circumcision is widely practiced by the Druze, the procedure is practiced as a cultural tradition, and has no religious significance in the Druze faith. Some Druzes do not circumcise their male children, and refuse to observe this practice.
Both faiths give a prominent place to Jesus: Jesus is the central figure of Christianity, and in the Druze faith, Jesus is considered an important prophet of God, being among the seven prophets who appeared in different periods of history. The Druze revere Jesus "the son of Joseph and Mary" and his four disciples, who wrote the Gospels. According to the Druze manuscripts Jesus is the Greatest Imam and the incarnation of Ultimate Reason (Akl) on earth and the first cosmic principle (Hadd), and regards Jesus and Hamza ibn Ali as the incarnations of one of the five great celestial powers, who form part of their system. In the Druze tradition, Jesus is known under three titles: the True Messiah (al-Masih al-Haq), the Messiah of all Nations (Masih al-Umam), and the Messiah of Sinners. This is due, respectively, to the belief that Jesus delivered the true Gospel message, the belief that he was the Saviour of all nations, and the belief that he offers forgiveness.
Both religions venerate the Virgin Mary, John the Baptist, Saint George, Elijah, Luke the Evangelist, Virgin Mary, Job and other common figures. Figures in the Old Testament such as Adam, Noah, Abraham, and Moses are considered important prophets of God in the Druze faith, being among the seven prophets who appeared in different periods of history. In the Old Testament, Jethro was Moses' father-in-law, a Kenite shepherd and priest of Midian. Shuaib or Jethro of Midian is considered an ancestor of the Druze who revere him as their spiritual founder and chief prophet.
Historians notes that the Druze have historically maintained a positive relationship with Christians, as evidenced by shared traditions and social practices in Mount Lebanon. This interaction has led to overlapping symbols, customs, mutual veneration of saints and their shrines, and shared terminology for God. Sites such as the Church of Saidet et Tallé in Deir el Qamar, historically a popular Marian pilgrimage site among the Druze, exemplify this cultural exchange. The Druze also venerate Christian saints like Saint George and the Prophet Elijah, admired for their "bravery and warrior-like qualities". Scholar Pierre-Yves Beaurepaire observes that these warrior saints resonate with the Druze due to their parallels with Druze militarized traditions.
Relationship with Hinduism
See also: Hinduism and other religions § ChristianityBuddhism, Hinduism and Christianity differ in their fundamental beliefs with regard to heaven, hell and reincarnation, to name a few. From the Hindu perspective, heaven (Sanskrit svarga) and hell (Naraka) are temporary places, where every soul has to live, either for the good deeds which they have done or for the sins which they have committed.
There are also significant similarities between Christian and Hindu theology, most notably, both religions present a trinitarian view of God. The Holy Trinity in Christianity, which consists of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, is sometimes seen as being roughly analogous to the Trimurti in Hinduism, whose members—Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva—are seen as the three principal manifestations of Brahman, or Godhead. Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva are recognized as distinct deities as opposed to a singular being.
Christian-Hindu relations are a mixed affair. On one hand, Hinduism's natural tendency has been to recognize the divine basis of various other religions, and to revere their founders and saintly practitioners. In Western countries, Vedanta has influenced some Christian thinkers, while others in the anti-cult movement have reacted against the activities of immigrant gurus and their followers. (See also: Pierre Johanns, Abhishiktananda, Bede Griffiths, Dalit theology.)
The Christian Ashram Movement, a movement within Christianity in India, embraces Vedanta and the teachings of the East, attempting to combine the Christian faith with the Hindu ashram model and Christian monasticism with the Hindu sannyasa tradition. Brahmoism is considered a syncretism of Hinduism with Protestantism or Lutheranism.
Relationship with Islam
See also: Christianity and Islam, Christian view of Muhammad, and Christian influences in IslamIslam shares a number of beliefs with Christianity. They share similar views on judgment, heaven, hell, spirits, angels, and a future resurrection. Jesus is acknowledged as a prophet by Muslims. However, while Islam relegates the man Jesus the Christ to a lesser status than God — "in the company of those nearest to God" in the Qur'an, mainstream (Trinitarian) Christianity since the Council of Nicea teaches without question the belief that Jesus is both fully man and fully God the Son, one of the three Hypostases (common English: persons) of Christianity's Trinity, divinely co-equal and co-eternal with the Father and the Holy Spirit.
Both religions share the belief in the virgin birth of Jesus, his miracles and healings, and they also share the belief that he ascended bodily into heaven. However, Jesus is not accepted as the Son of God by Muslims, who strictly maintain the belief that he was a human being who was loved by God and exalted to the ranks of the most righteous by God. They believe that God is a single entity, and do not accept the first person in the Trinity as God as the vast majority of Christians do. Additionally, Muslims do not accept Jesus's literal crucifixion and subsequent resurrection. Since Muslims believe in the worship of a strictly monotheistic form of God the Father who they do not believe assumed human form in the Holy Trinity through Jesus Christ, they do not accept the use of icons to worship God, which they consider shirk (idolatry). Muslim influence played a part in the initiation of iconoclasm and their conquests caused the iconoclasm in the Byzantine Empire. For the same reason, they do not worship or pray to Muhammad, Jesus, or any other prophets; they only pray to God.
Adherents of Islam have historically referred to themselves, Jews, and Christians (among others) as People of the Book since they all base their religion on Abrahamic books that are considered to have a divine origin. Christians, with the notable exception of Chrislam adherents however, neither recognize the Qur'an as a genuine book of divine revelation, nor agree with its lowly assessment of Jesus only as a prophet, on par with Muhammad, nor for that matter accept that Muhammad was a genuine prophet of God. In the 7th century text Concerning Heresy, Saint John of Damascus named Islam as Christological heresy, referring to it as the "heresy of the Ishmaelites" (see medieval Christian views on Muhammad). The position has remained popular in Christian circles well into the 20th century, by theologians such as the Congregationalist cleric Frank Hugh Foster and the Roman Catholic historian Hilaire Belloc, the latter of who described it as "the great and enduring heresy of Mohammed."
Most Muslims, for their part, believe that parts of the Gospels, Torah and Jewish prophetic books have been forgotten, misinterpreted, or distorted by their followers. Based on that perspective, Muslims view the Qur'an as correcting the errors of traditional Judeo-Christianity. For example, with the exception of Messianic Islam and sometimes Koranism, Muslims in general on an anti-Catholic basis reject belief in the Trinity or any other expression of the divinity of Jesus as incompatible with monotheism.
Not surprisingly, the two faiths have often experienced mutual controversy and conflict (an example being the Crusades, fought in response to Islamic conquests and attitudes to non-Muslims, in the near and Middle East). At the same time, much fruitful dialogue has occurred with the Catholic Church as well, especially since in the wake of the modernizing liberal reforms of Vatican 2 regarding proper Catholic relations with many other major world religions. The writings of Catholic theologian Thomas Aquinas frequently cite those of the Jewish philosopher Moses Maimonides, as well as Muslim thinker Averroes ('Ibn-Rushd).
On the other hand, the two faiths have experienced mutual peaceful coexistence, interaction, and cultural and sociala, and there was a cultural and human exchange between the Christian and Islamic worlds. The Muslim world is home to some of the world's most ancient Christian communities, and some of the most important cities of the Christian world—including three of its five great patriarchates (Alexandria, Antioch, and Constantinople). Scholars and intellectuals agree Christians have made significant contributions to Arab and Islamic civilization since the introduction of Islam, and they have had a significant impact contributing the culture of the Middle East and North Africa and other areas. Pew Research Center estimates indicate that in 2010, more than 64 million Christians lived in countries with Muslim majorities (excluding Nigeria). The Pew Forum study finds that Indonesia (21.1 million) has the largest Christian population in the Muslim world, followed by Egypt, Chad and Kazakhstan.
On May 6, 2001 Pope John Paul II, the first pope to pray in a mosque, delivered an address at Umayyad Mosque in Damascus, saying: "It is important that Muslims and Christians continue to explore philosophical and theological questions together, in order to come to a more objective and comprehensive knowledge of each other's religious beliefs. Better mutual understanding will surely lead, at the practical level, to a new way of presenting our two religions not in opposition, as has happened too often in the past, but in partnership for the good of the human family." This Mosque of Damascus is famous for containing the head of John the Baptist.
Relationship with Judaism
See also: Antisemitism in Christianity, Christianity and Judaism, Judeo-Christian, and Responsibility for the death of JesusThe relationship between Christianity and Judaism has been strained. In the past, Christians were often taught that "the Jews" killed Christ, for whose "murder" they bear a collective guilt (an interpretation which most major denominations now reject). Meanwhile, Jews have tended to associate Christianity with various pogroms, or in better times, they have tended to associate it with the dangers of assimilation. Anti-Semitism has a long history in Christianity (see Antisemitism in Christianity), and it is far from dead (for example, it exists in contemporary Russia). However, since the Holocaust, much dialogue which is aimed at Christian–Jewish reconciliation has taken place, and relations between Jews and Christians have greatly improved. Today, many conservative evangelicals support Christian Zionism, much to the irritation of Arab Christians, partly based on the Millennialist belief that the modern state of Israel represents the fulfillment of Biblical prophecy.
According to Anna Sapir Abulafia, most scholars agree that Jews and Christians in Latin Christendom lived in relative peace with one another until the 13th century. Sicut Judaeis (the "Constitution for the Jews") was the official position of the papacy regarding Jews throughout the Middle Ages and later. The first papal bull was issued in about 1120 by Calixtus II, intended to protect Jews who suffered during the First Crusade, and was reaffirmed by many popes, even until the 15th century although they were not always strictly upheld. The bull forbade, besides other things, Christians from coercing Jews to convert, or to harm them, or to take their property, or to disturb the celebration of their festivals, or to interfere with their cemeteries, on pain of excommunication.
The phenomenon of Messianic Judaism has become something of an irritant to Jewish / Christian relations. Messianic Jews—who generally seek to combine a Jewish identity with the recognition of Jesus—are rejected by mainstream Jewish groups, who dismiss Messianic Judaism as little more than Christianity with Jewish undertones.
The Jewish conception of the messiah (משיח mashiach in Hebrew) holds certain similarities to that of Christians, yet there are substantial differences. According to Jews, the Hebrew Scriptures contain a small number of prophecies concerning a future descendant of King David, who will be anointed (Hebrew: moshiach) as the Jewish people's new leader and will establish the throne of David in Jerusalem forever. In the Jewish view, this fully human and mortal leader will rebuild the land of Israel and restore the Davidic Kingdom. This subject is covered in the section on Jewish eschatology. Some Christians have a different understanding of the term messiah, and believe that Jesus is the messiah referred to in the Old Testament prophecies; that the kingdom in these prophecies was to be a heavenly kingdom, not an earthly one; and that Jesus' words and actions in the New Testament provide evidence of his identity as messiah and that the remainder of messianic prophecy will be fulfilled in the Second Coming. Other Christians acknowledge the Jewish definition of messiah, and hold that Jesus fulfills this, being 'fully man' (in addition to being 'fully God'), and believe that the Second Coming will establish the Kingdom of God on earth, where Jesus, as messiah and descendant from David, will reign from Jerusalem.
Relationship with Mithraism and Sol Invictus
There are many parallels between Mithraism, the religion of Sol Invictus, and Christianity. Aurelian is believed to have established the Dies Natalis Solis Invicti (Day of the Birth of Sol Invictus) as an annual festival held on the day when the sun's daily declination visibly starts rising again after the winter solstice, namely on December 25; the birth of the central figure was thus celebrated on the day which Christians later used to celebrate Jesus' birth (having always celebrated this on Epiphany). Other similarities include the stories of Christ and Mithra as children being visited by shepherds, the trinity, and the immortal soul. Sunday itself was imposed as the official day of rest by Constantine, who referred to it as the Day of the venerable Sun. (Although Christians worshiped on Sunday from at least 150 years before Constantine)
The earliest attestation of Mithraism is Plutarch's record of it being practised in 68BC by Cilician pirates, the first mithraists. Tertullian, a Christian writer who lived between the 2nd and 3rd centuries, admitted there was a strong similarity between the practises of the two faiths:
- the devil, ... mimics even the essential portions of the divine sacraments...he baptises some, that is his own believers, ... he promises the forgiveness of sins... Mithraism, .... also celebrates the oblation of bread, and introduces a symbol of the resurrection... - Tertullian,
Justin Martyr, an earlier 2nd century Church Father, agreed that the similarities existed, claiming that Mithraism had copied the Eucharist. Justin argued that the devil had invented Mithraism to mock Christianity. Christian apologist Ronald H. Nash stated:
- allegations of an early Christian dependence on Mithraism have been rejected on many grounds. Mithraism had no concept of the death and resurrection of its god and no place for any concept of rebirth -- at least during its early stages...During the early stages of the cult, the notion of rebirth would have been foreign to its basic outlook...Moreover, Mithraism was basically a military cult. Therefore, one must be skeptical about suggestions that it appealed to nonmilitary people like the early Christians.
Relationship with Paganism
Main article: Christianity and paganismRelationship with Scientology
See also: Jesus in ScientologyIn the 2008 book Vintage Jesus: Timeless Answers to Timely Questions, authors Mark Driscoll and Gerry Breshears write: "According to Scientology, Jesus is an "implant" forced upon a Thetan about a million years ago", and Jack Huberman writes in 101 People Who Are Really Screwing America that in Scientology Jesus is seen as having been "implanted in humanity's collective memory", by the character Xenu from Scientology space opera.
Professor Paul Blankenship of the Memphis Theological Seminary studied Scientology and commented on this view, saying "They do not do a lot of talking about God or Jesus. It's more getting your mind cleared, and I could see how they could say that that could be compatible. Scientology has not really developed into a complete religious tradition. They may very well develop."
The Church of Scientology claims that their belief system is different from Christianity because it is based “solely on reason” and that its members “possess a practical system of ethics and justice.” The church likewise claims that “anything religious teachers said or Buddha promised, even the visions of Christianity, are attained in Scientology as a result.” Muck, Netland and McDermott emphasize that this clearly shows that Scientology is incompatible with Christianity.
In the book New Religions and the Theological Imagination in America (1995) by Mary Farrell Bednarowski, the author comments that "In the game of life as Scientology understands it, sin does not call for repentance as much as it does the eradication of error, and that must come through the technology, the auditing process, sometimes referred to as pastoral counseling. In fact, in regard to getting rid of sin, Scientology sees parallels between the goals of its technology and Jesus's saving action." Bednarowski quotes from the Scientology publication The Scientology Catechism in noting these parallels between the stated mission of Scientologists and the teachings imparted by Christ to his disciples. She notes that Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard is not regarded in Scientology as a "divine savior", but rather a "loved friend and teacher". Writing in Signs of the Times: The New Religious Movements in Theological Perspective (1996), John A. Saliba cites Mary Bednarowski, and goes on to note "Helle Medgaard asserts that Scientology also misunderstands Jesus and repudiates the key Christian doctrine of the forgiveness of sins." In his book The Sociology of Religious Movements (1996), William Sims Bainbridge cites the research of Roy Wallis, in noting "Scientology ... has no discernible connection to Christianity".
Possible relationship with Zoroastrianism through Judaism
Many scholars believe that the eschatology of Judaism and the idea of monotheism as a whole possibly originated in Zoroastrianism, and it may have been transferred to Judaism during the Babylonian captivity, and it eventually influenced Christian theology. Bible scholar P.R. Ackroyd states: "the whole eschatological scheme, however, of the Last Judgment, rewards and punishments, etc., within which immortality is achieved, is manifestly Zoroastrian in origin and inspiration." However, the theory is questioned by other mainstream historians and scholars. The Oxford History of the Biblical World states "There is little if any effect of Zoroastrian elements on Judaism in the Persian period." Nevertheless, scholars such as Soloman Nigosian contend, in regarding the similar ideas of Zoroaster and later Jewish writers, that "the ideas were indigenous to Iran...it is hardly conceivable that some of the characteristic ideas and practices in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam came into being without Zoroastrian influence." The new faith (Zoroastrianism) emerged in larger Persian empires. " Zoroastrianism reflected the cosmopolitan society of the empires". During this time Zoroastrianism profoundly effected the beliefs and values of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam ("Traditions & Encounters: A brief global History", Jerry H. Bentley. pg. 93). It is also possible that Zoroastrianism and later Jewish theology came from a common source.
For more on this theory, see Jewish history, Judaism, and Zoroastrianism.
In the Younger Avesta, three divinities of the Zoroastrian pantheon are repeatedly identified as ahuric, meaning that each, as Ahura, act together in both representing and protecting Asha, or the divine truth governing the universe. These three are Ahura Mazda, Mithra and Burz, and hence known as the "Ahuric triad." Similarities with the Christian Trinity can be seen between Ahura Mazda and God the Father, Mithra and Christ the Logos, as well as between Burz and the Holy Spirit, both of which are associated symbolically with water. Both Zoroastrianism and Christianity consider themselves to be monotheistic, but like all other monotheisms they have highlighted certain aspects or energies of the divine to emphasize, and these are not meant to be interpreted as separate divinities. In both religions there are guardian angels, or fravashi, which are considered to be created beings and are distinct from the Energies of God or divine emanations. The Zoroastrian term yazata, however, has variously been interpreted as meaning emanations or "sparks" of the divine, or as being roughly synonymous with the term "angels." There have been various theories on the possible relationship between these aspects of Zoroastrianism and ideas of divine emanation in esoteric Christianity, Jewish Kabbalah, Islamic mysticism (Sufism), and other religious systems, such as Gnosticism, Yazidism, and the Druze, among others.
Sociological aspects
This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The spread of Christianity has been international, and in some cases it has entirely displaced the religions of those people who it was proselytized to and it has also altered their customs. At times, this centuries-long process has been met with violent opposition, and likewise, the spread of Christianity has been carried out with martial force in some cases. To some extent, the relationship between Christianity and other faiths has been encumbered by this history, and modern Christians, particularly in the West, have expressed embarrassment over the violence which existed in Christianity's past.
The conversion of adherents of other religions is widely accepted within Christianity. Many Christian organizations believe that they have a duty to make converts among every people. In recent years, ecumenism and dialogue between different religions has been endorsed by many official representatives of the Christian churches, as a way of effecting reconciliation between Christian people and people of other faiths, leading to many cases of reconciliation. In some cases, this endorsement is accompanied by a complete disavowal of all proselytizing efforts under the banner of religious pluralism.
This is specially marked by the inauguration, or installation, of Archbishop of York Dr John Sentamu from Uganda, on November 29, 2005. Dr Sentamu is the first black African archbishop of the Church of England. He is also the first archbishop to beat bongo drums in the cathedral at his own inauguration. The newspaper Guardian, which dedicated the double middle page of the following day's issue to a full picture of the grinning archbishop in full apparel at the porch of the cathedral, said that: "Dr Sentamu's sermon was a stern lecture to the Church of England to grow out of being a 'judgmental and moralising' congregation of 'pew-fillers, sermon-taters, Bible readers, even born-again believers and Spirit-filled charismatics' and go out to make friends in the world. 'We have lost the joy and power that makes real disciples and we've become consumers of religion, not disciples of Jesus-Christ', he said. 'Christians, go and make friends among Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, Muslims, Sikhs, agnostics, atheists, not for the purpose of converting them to your beliefs but for friendship, understanding, listening, hearing.' His remarks were greeted with applause, not with silence as the order of the service instructed."
A special case is the issue of Christian–Jewish reconciliation, in which significant reconciliation has been reached.
Syncretism
Main article: Christian syncretismChristian converts have often carried some of their former customs into their new faith. On occasion, this has led to syncretisms, that are often not accepted by mainstream Christians:
- In Cuban Santería, the West African orishas are venerated in the shape of Catholic saints.
- The Chinese Taiping Rebels replaced the Bible with the Confucian classics.
- The God's Army of Myanmar mixed Karen traditions with Protestantism.
- The Vietnamese syncretic religion Cao Dai locates Jesus in the celestial Council of Great Spirits that directs the universe. It also has a pope with an elaborate hierarchy and its temples are influenced by Catholic churches.
- The Lacandon people of Central America acknowledge Äkyantho', the god of foreigners. He has a son named Hesuklistos (Jesus Christ) who is supposed to be the god of the foreigners. They recognize that Hesuklistos is a god but do not feel he is worthy of worship as he is a minor god.
See also
- Christ myth theory
- Christian views on astrology
- Christian views on magic
- Comparative religion
- Institute for Interreligious Dialogue
- Islam and other religions
- Jewish views on religious pluralism
- Missiology
- Theology of religions
References
- Defending Salvation Through Christ Alone Archived 2009-10-03 at the Wayback Machine By Jason Carlson, Christian Ministries International
- Foundation Documents: Confessional Statement Archived 2017-09-08 at the Wayback Machine By The Gospel Coalition
- Effendi, Shoghi (1973). "32: BIBLE (Authenticity of the)". Directives from the Guardian.
- Bahá'u'lláh, Abdu'l-Bahá, Shoghi Effendi, and Universal House of Justice. "The Bible: Extracts on the Old and New Testaments". Baháʼí Library Online. Retrieved November 6, 2016.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Encyclopædia Britannica, 1878 edition, article Buddhism by T.W. Rhys Davids
- De Bunsen, Ernest (1880). The Angel-Messiah of Buddhists, Essenes, and Christians. Longmans, Green, and Company. p. 50.
- Tedesco, Frank (1997). "Questions for Buddhist and Christian Cooperation in Korea". Buddhist-Christian Studies. 17: 179–195. doi:10.2307/1390412. JSTOR 1390412.
- ^ Hitti, Philip K. (1928). The Origins of the Druze People and Religion: With Extracts from Their Sacred Writings. Library of Alexandria. p. 37. ISBN 9781465546623.
- ^ Dana, Nissim (2008). The Druze in the Middle East: Their Faith, Leadership, Identity and Status. Michigan University press. p. 17. ISBN 9781903900369.
- Hazran, Yusri (2013). The Druze Community and the Lebanese State: Between Confrontation and Reconciliation. Routledge. p. 32. ISBN 9781317931737.
the Druze had been able to live in harmony with the Christian
- Artzi, Pinḥas (1984). Confrontation and Coexistence. Bar-Ilan University Press. p. 166. ISBN 9789652260499.
.. Europeans who visited the area during this period related that the Druze "love the Christians more than the other believers," and that they "hate the Turks, the Muslims and the Arabs with an intense hatred.
- CHURCHILL (1862). The Druzes and the Maronites. Montserrat Abbey Library. p. 25.
..the Druzes and Christians lived together in the most perfect harmony and good-will..
- ^ Hobby (1985). Near East/South Asia Report. Foreign Broadcast Information Service. p. 53.
the Druzes and the Christians in the Shuf Mountains in the past lived in complete harmony..
- Fawaz, L.T. (1994). An Occasion for War: Civil Conflict in Lebanon and Damascus in 1860. University of California Press. ISBN 9780520087828. Retrieved 2015-04-16.
- Vocke, Harald (1978). The Lebanese war: its origins and political dimensions. C. Hurst. p. 10. ISBN 0-903983-92-3.
- A. Frazee, Charles (2006). Catholics and Sultans: The Church and the Ottoman Empire 1453-1923. Cambridge University Press. p. 191. ISBN 9780521027007.
the conversion to Christianity of several Muslim and Druze families aided this growth immeasurably
- "Refugee Review Tribunal: What is the attitude of the Druze community toward inter-religious marriages?" (PDF). Refworl. 6 June 2006.
- A. Kayyali, Randa (2006). The Arab Americans. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 21. ISBN 9780313332197.
some Christians (mostly from the Orthodox faith), as well as Druze, converted to Protestantism...
- A. Kayyali, Randa (2006). The Arab Americans. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 21. ISBN 9780313332197.
Many of the Druze have chosen to deemphasize their ethnic identity, and some have officially converted to Christianity.
- Hobby, Jeneen (2011). Encyclopedia of Cultures and Daily Life. University of Philadelphia Press. p. 232. ISBN 9781414448916.
US Druze settled in small towns and kept a low profile, joining Protestant churches (usually Presbyterian or Methodist) and often Americanizing their names..
- Granli, Elisabet (2011). "Religious conversion in Syria : Alawite and Druze believers". University of Oslo.
- Mishaqa, Mikhail (1988). Thackston, Wheeler McIntosh (ed.). Murder, Mayhem, Pillage, and Plunder: The History of the Lebanon in the 18th and 19th Centuries by Mikhayil Mishaqa (1800–1873). State University of New York Press. p. 23. ISBN 9780887067129.
- Gábor Ágoston; Bruce Alan Masters (2009-01-01). Encyclopedia of the Ottoman Empire. Infobase Publishing. p. 530. ISBN 978-1-4381-1025-7. Retrieved 2013-05-25.
- al- H̲azīn, Farīd (2000). The Breakdown of the State in Lebanon, 1967-1976. Harvard University Press. p. 35. ISBN 9780674081055.
So did other amirs, like the originally Druze Abi-llamah family, which also became Maronite
- Mackey, Sandra (2006). Lebanon: A House Divided. W.W. Norton. p. 62. ISBN 9780393352764.
- Farhad Daftary (24 April 1992). The Isma'ilis: Their History and Doctrines. Cambridge University Press. pp. 375–. ISBN 978-0-521-42974-0. Retrieved 13 September 2012.
- The Druze and Assad: Strategic Bedfellows
- Fadwa N. Kirrish, "Druze Ethnicity in the Golan Heights: The Interface of Religion and Politics," Journal of the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs 13.1 (1992), 122-135
- Deeb, Marius (2013). Syria, Iran, and Hezbollah: The Unholy Alliance and Its War on Lebanon. Hoover Press. ISBN 9780817916664.
the Maronites and the Druze, who founded Lebanon in the early eighteenth century.
- "On the Horizon: The Strange World of the Druzes". Commentary Magazine. 20 January 1956.
- Quilliam, Neil (1999). Syria and the New World Order. Michigan University press. p. 42. ISBN 9780863722493.
- The New Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica. 1992. p. 237. ISBN 9780852295533.
Druze religious beliefs developed out of Isma'ill teachings. Various Jewish, Christian, Gnostic, Neoplatonic, and Iranian elements, however, are combined under a doctrine of strict monotheism.
- ^ Mahmut, R. İbrahim (2023). "The Christian Influences in Ismaili Thought". The Journal of Iranian Studies. 7 (1): 83–99. doi:10.33201/iranian.1199758.
- ^ Nisan, Mordechai (2002), Minorities in the Middle East: a history of struggle and self-expression (2nd, illustrated ed.), McFarland, p. 95, ISBN 978-0-7864-1375-1, retrieved 4 April 2012
- D. De Smet; Ismāʻīl Tamīmī; Ḥamzah ibn ʻAlī ibn Aḥmad (2007). Les Epitres Sacrees Des Druzes Rasa'il Al-hikma: Introduction, Edition Critique Et Traduction Annotee Des Traites Attribues a Hamza B. 'ali Et Isma'il At-tamimi. Peeters. ISBN 978-90-429-1943-3. Retrieved 17 March 2011.
- L. Stanton, Andrea (2012). Cultural Sociology of the Middle East, Asia, and Africa: An Encyclopedia. SAGE. p. 330. ISBN 9781412981767.
- Clark, R. Scott (17 September 2012). "Baptism and Circumcision According to Colossians 2:11–12". The Heidelblog. Retrieved 24 December 2020.
- Crowther, Jonathan (1815). A Portraiture of Methodism. p. 224.
- Marie, André (26 December 2016). "Circumcision: An Acceptable Practice?". The Catholic Thing. Retrieved 23 December 2020.
- Sicard, Sigvard von (1970). The Lutheran Church on the Coast of Tanzania 1887-1914: With Special Reference to the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Tanzania, Synod of Uzaramo-Uluguru. Gleerup. p. 157.
- Gruenbaum, Ellen (2015). The Female Circumcision Controversy: An Anthropological Perspective. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 61. ISBN 9780812292510.
Christian theology generally interprets male circumcision to be an Old Testament rule that is no longer an obligation ... though in many countries (especially the United States and Sub-Saharan Africa, but not so much in Europe) it is widely practiced among Christians
- Stearns, Peter N. (2008). The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World. Oxford University Press. p. 179. ISBN 9780195176322.
Uniformly practiced by Jews, Muslims, and the members of Coptic, Ethiopian, and Eritrean Orthodox Churches, male circumcision remains prevalent in many regions of the world, particularly Africa, South and East Asia, Oceania, and Anglosphere countries.
- "Male circumcision: Global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety and acceptability" (PDF). World Health Organization. 2007. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-12-22.
- Thomas Riggs (2006). "Christianity: Coptic Christianity". Worldmark Encyclopedia of Religious Practices: Religions and denominations. Thomson Gale. ISBN 978-0-7876-6612-5. Archived from the original on 2016-01-18.
- "Circumcision". Columbia Encyclopedia. Columbia University Press. 2011. Archived from the original on 2015-09-24.
- Clark M (10 March 2011). Islam For Dummies. John Wiley & Sons. p. 170. ISBN 978-1-118-05396-6. Archived from the original on 18 January 2016.
- Ubayd, Anis (2006). The Druze and Their Faith in Tawhid. Syracuse University Press. p. 150. ISBN 9780815630975.
Male circumcision is standard practice, by tradition, among the Druze
- Jacobs, Daniel (1998). Israel and the Palestinian Territories: The Rough Guide. Rough Guides. p. 147. ISBN 9781858282480.
Circumcision is not compulsory and has no religious significance.
- Brenton Betts, Robert (2013). The Sunni-Shi'a Divide: Islam's Internal Divisions and Their Global Consequences. Potomac Books, Inc. p. 56. ISBN 9781612345239.
There are many references to the Druze refusal to observe this common Muslim practice, one of the earliest being the rediscoverer of the ruins of Petra, John Burckhardt. "The Druses do not circumcise their children
- A Political and Economic Dictionary of the Middle East. Routledge. 2013. ISBN 9781135355616.
...Druze believe in seven prophets: Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Muhammad, and Muhammad ibn Ismail ad-Darazi..
- ^ Dana, Nissim (2008). The Druze in the Middle East: Their Faith, Leadership, Identity and Status. Michigan University press. p. 47. ISBN 978-1-903900-36-9.
- Massignon, Louis (2019). The Passion of Al-Hallaj, Mystic and Martyr of Islam, Volume 1: The Life of Al-Hallaj. Princeton University Press. p. 594. ISBN 9780691610832.
- Crone, Patricia (2013). The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought. Princeton University Press. p. 139. ISBN 9780691134840.
- Swayd, Samy (2019). The A to Z of the Druzes. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 88. ISBN 9780810870024.
Jesus is known in the Druze tradition as the "True Messiah" (al-Masih al-Haq), for he delivered what Druzes view as the true message. He is also referred to as the "Messiah of the Nations" (Masih al-Umam) because he was sent to the world as "Masih of Sins" because he is the one who forgives.
- Makdisi, Ussama (2000). The Culture of Sectarianism: Community, History, and Violence in Nineteenth-Century Ottoman Lebanon. University of California Press. p. 35. ISBN 978-0520218468.
- ^ Swayd, Samy (2015). Historical Dictionary of the Druzes. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 77. ISBN 978-1442246171.
- Murphy-O'Connor, Jerome (2008). The Holy Land: An Oxford Archaeological Guide from Earliest Times to 1700. OUP Oxford. p. 205. ISBN 9780191647666.
- ^ S. Swayd, Samy (2009). The A to Z of the Druzes. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 109. ISBN 9780810868366.
They also cover the lives and teachings of some biblical personages, such as Job, Jethro, Jesus, John, Luke, and others
- Bowman, Glenn (2012). Sharing the Sacra: The Politics and Pragmatics of Intercommunal Relations Around Holy Places. Berghahn Books. p. 17. ISBN 9780857454867.
- Harris, Stephen L., Understanding the Bible. Palo Alto: Mayfield. 1985.
- A Political and Economic Dictionary of the Middle East. Routledge. 2013. ISBN 9781135355616.
- Hitti, Philip (2010). Lebanon in History: From the Earliest Times to the Present. University of Michigan Press. p. 408-410. ISBN 9789004129382.
- Mackey, Sandra (2006). Lebanon: A House Divided. W. W. Norton. p. 62. ISBN 9780393352764.
- ^ Beaurepaire, Pierre-Yves (2017). Religious Interactions in Europe and the Mediterranean World: Coexistence and Dialogue from the 12th to the 20th Centuries. Taylor & Francis. pp. 310–314. ISBN 9781351722179.
- Munro, Dane; Haddad, Nour Fara (2019). Peace Journeys: A New Direction in Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage Research. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 7. ISBN 9781527543133.
- Bowman, Glenn (2012). Sharing the Sacra: The Politics and Pragmatics of Intercommunal Relations Around Holy Places. Berghahn Books. p. 17. ISBN 9780857454867.
- Christian Ashram Movement
- Natesan, G.A. (1948). The Indian Review. G. A. Natesan & Company. Retrieved 2023-03-01.
- Bergunder, M.; Frese, H.; Schröder, U. (2011). Ritual, Caste, and Religion in Colonial South India. Primus Books. p. 319. ISBN 978-93-80607-21-4. Retrieved 2023-03-01.
- van Bijlert, V.A. (2020). Vedantic Hinduism in Colonial Bengal: Reformed Hinduism and Western Protestantism. Routledge Studies in Religion. Taylor & Francis. p. 188. ISBN 978-1-000-16997-3. Retrieved 2023-03-01.
- Indian Institute of World Culture (1993). Transaction - Indian Institute of World Culture. Retrieved 2023-03-01.
- The Court Journal: Court Circular & Fashionable Gazette. Alabaster, Pasemore & sons, Limited. 1833. p. 723. Retrieved 2023-03-01.
- Robinson, Neal (31 July 1991). Christ in Islam and Christianity. New York: State University of New York Press. p. 12. ISBN 978-0791405598.
- Toynbee, Arnold Joseph (1987). A Study of History: Abridgement of volumes VII-X. Oxford University Press. p. 259. ISBN 9780195050813.
- Vajda, G (2012). "Ahl al-Kitāb". In P. Bearman; Th. Bianquis; C.E. Bosworth; E. van Donzel; W.P. Heinrichs (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Brill. p. 264. doi:10.1163/1573-3912_islam_SIM_0383.
- Griffith, Sidney H. (April 4, 2010). The Church in the Shadow of the Mosque: Christians and Muslims in the World of Islam. Princeton University Press. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-691-14628-7.
- Wismer, Don (September 13, 2016). Routledge Revivals: The Islamic Jesus (1977): An Annotated Bibliography of Sources in English and French. Routledge.
The old opinion of John of Damascus continues to persist among Christian orientalists. The author here replies to Frank Hugh Foster (see 233), who said that Islam is in fact heretical Christianity.
- Murray, Douglas (May 4, 2017). The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 131. ISBN 978-1-4729-4222-7.
- Jenkins, Philip (2020). The Rowman & Littlefield Handbook of Christianity in the Middle East. Rowman & Littlefield. p. XLVIII. ISBN 9781538124185.
- Jacobsen, Douglas (2011). The World's Christians: Who they are, Where they are, and How they got there. John Wiley & Sons. p. 423. ISBN 9781444397291.
- Hill, Donald. Islamic Science and Engineering. 1993. Edinburgh Univ. Press. ISBN 0-7486-0455-3, p. 4
- Brague, Rémi (2009). The Legend of the Middle Ages. University of Chicago Press. p. 164. ISBN 978-0-226-07080-3.
- Pacini, Andrea (1998). Christian Communities in the Arab Middle East: The Challenge of the Future. Clarendon Press. pp. 38, 55. ISBN 978-0-19-829388-0. Archived from the original on 10 March 2021. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
- C. Ellis, Kail (2017). Jews, Antisemitism, and the Middle East. Routledge. p. 173. ISBN 9781351510721.
- Curtis, Michael (2018). Secular Nationalism and Citizenship in Muslim Countries: Arab Christians in the Levant. Springer. p. 11. ISBN 9781351510721.
Christian contributions to art, culture, and literature in the Arab-Islamic world; Christian contributions education and social advancement in the region.
- "Global Christianity – A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World's Christian Population" (PDF). Pew Research Center. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 August 2019.
- Abulafia, Anna Sapir, ed. (2002). Religious Violence Between Christians and Jews: Medieval Roots, Modern Perspectives. UK: Palgrave. ISBN 978-1-34942-499-3.
- Bachrach, Bernard S. (1977). Early medieval Jewish policy in Western Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 0-8166-0814-8.
- Fredriksen, Paula (October 2009). "Review: Revisiting Augustine's Doctrine of Jewish Witness". The Journal of Religion. 89 (4): 564–578. doi:10.1086/600873. JSTOR 10.1086/600873. S2CID 170403439.
- Baskin, Judith R.; Seeskin, Kenneth (12 July 2010). The Cambridge Guide to Jewish History, Religion, and Culture. Cambridge University Press. p. 120. ISBN 9780521869607.
- Archived 2011-07-24 at the Wayback Machine
- Justin Martyr, First Apology, 67.3
- Plutarch, Life of Pompey, 24.5
- The Prescription Against Heretics, 40
- ^ First Apology, 66.4
- R. Nash, Christianity and the Hellenistic World as quoted in Baker's Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics, Norman Geisler; Baker Books, Grand Rapids, Mich.; 1999, p. 492.
- Driscoll, Mark; Gerry Breshears (2008). Vintage Jesus: Timeless Answers to Timely Questions. Good News Publishers. pp. 14, 183. ISBN 978-1-58134-975-7.
- Huberman, Jack (2006). 101 People Who Are Really Screwing America. Nation Books. pp. 51. ISBN 978-1-56025-875-9.
- Dries, Bill (September 4, 1997). "Scientology May Fit In, Say Local Religious Leaders". The Commercial Appeal. p. A1.
- Muck, Terry C.; Netland, Harold A.; McDermott, Gerald R. (2014). Handbook of Religion: A Christian Engagement with Traditions, Teachings, and Practices. Baker Academic. ISBN 9781441246004. Retrieved 2016-06-15.
- ^ Bednarowski, Mary Farrell (1995). New Religions and the Theological Imagination in America. Indiana University Press. p. 61. ISBN 0-253-20952-8.
- Saliba, John A; Centre d'information sur les nouvelles religions (1996). Signs of the Times: The New Religious Movements in Theological Perspective. Montreal: Médiaspaul. p. 32. ISBN 9782894203262. OCLC 35886835.
- Bainbridge, William Sims (1996). The Sociology of Religious Movements. Routledge. p. 411 (1997 edition). ISBN 0-415-91202-4.
- Zoroastrianism: A Shadowy but Powerful Presence in the Judaeo-Christian World, Mary Boyce, London, 1987, and Encyclopedia Americana, Danbury, Connecticut, 1988, vol 29, pp. 813–815, article by J. Duchesne-Guillemin.
- Peake's Commentary on the Bible, Matthew Black and H.H. Rowley, ed., Revised edition, Nelson, New York, 1982, section 607b
- The Oxford History of the Biblical World, M. Coogan, ed., 1998.
- S. A. Nigosian, The Zoroastrian Faith, 97
- Blagov, Serguei A. (2001). "5: Caodaist Hierarchy and Ritials ". Caodaism: Vietnamese Traditionalism and Its Leap Into Modernity. Nova Publishers. p. 53. ISBN 978-1-59033-150-7. Retrieved 3 March 2021.
- McGee, Jon (2002) "Watching Lacandon Maya Lives," Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Further reading
- Ankerl, Guy (2000) . Global communication without universal civilization. INU societal research. Vol. 1: Coexisting contemporary civilizations : Arabo-Muslim, Bharati, Chinese, and Western. Geneva: INU Press. ISBN 978-2-88155-004-1.
- Ingham, Michael, Bp. (1997). Mansions of the Spirit: the Gospel in a Multi-Faith World. Toronto, Ont.: Anglican Book Centre. ISBN 1-55126-185-5
- Zuckermann, Ghil'ad . "'Etymythological Othering' and the Power of 'Lexical Engineering' in Judaism, Islam and Christianity. A Socio-Philo(sopho)logical Perspective", Explorations in the Sociology of Language and Religion, edited by Tope Omoniyi and Joshua A. Fishman, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 237–258. ISBN 90-272-2710-1
Christianity | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bible (Scriptures) | |||||||||
Foundations | |||||||||
History (timeline) (spread) |
| ||||||||
Denominations (list, members) |
| ||||||||
Theology | |||||||||
Philosophy | |||||||||
Other features |
| ||||||||