Misplaced Pages

User talk:C.Fred: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:14, 15 March 2008 edit利害(Li4Hai) (talk | contribs)264 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:33, 15 January 2025 edit undoC.Fred (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators278,036 edits Undid revision 1269532152 by CollectiveWest (talk) - redundantTag: Undo 
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--Headings. If you're leaving a new message, please do so at the BOTTOM of the page. Thank you!-->
{{tmbox
|text=Welcome to my talk page.
* Please sign and date your comment (by adding <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.
* Please if you wish to leave me a new message. If you're following up on a previous message, keep your comment in that same place:
** If you leave me a message here, I will reply here and {{tl|Mention}} you here or leave a {{tl|Talkback}} template on your talk page, unless you indicate that you are watching my page or no talkback message is necessary.
** '''If you are responding to a message I left on your talk page, please reply there''' so the discussion stays in one place. Please {{tl|Mention}} me in the message there or leave a {{tl|Talkback}} template here so I know about the message, unless I indicate that no talkback is necessary in my message. ''If you are commenting here on a message or warning I left there, don't be surprised if I move the discussion back to your talk page.''
* This page is set for automatic archiving every 7 days. I will remove talkback messages as acknowledgment that I have read the related reply, and I reserve the right to summarily remove any uncivil comments or frivolous warnings.
Thank you, and happy editing!
}}
{{archive box|auto=yes}} {{archive box|auto=yes}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 200K |maxarchivesize = 200K
|counter = 2 |counter = 32
|algo = old(7d) |algo = old(7d)
|archive = User talk:C.Fred/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:C.Fred/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
{{Busy|end=]}} <!-- {{Busy|end=]}} -->
<!-- End of headings, but please add comments to the bottom of the page, or use the New Section tab on the toolbar -->
'''Note: Due to work obligations, my responses to comments made here may be delayed from Feb. 1 until April 15.'''


== Regarding Al-Bukhari. ==
''Please add new threads to the bottom of the page. I will reply to your talk page unless you request otherwise. I may reply to your talk page and copy my response here to preserve a thread or note that the issue has been dealt with.''


Hello threre, regarding my edits on '''Al-Bukhari''' article, first of all i am not the one who started this editing war. hence i am not sure why you're reverting my changes. the matter of the fact is that the ancestry of al-bukhari is not agreed upon by Muslim scholars, neither early ones nor contemporary. and there are three opinions on the matter and historians have differed widely on the subject. I have re-written the article to reflect all points of view objectively and without bias. so what's the problem here? ] (]) 17:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
''Note that all threads older than 7 days will be archived. Please sign and date your comment (by adding ''<code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>'' at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.''


:@] You are the one who is at (or has actually crossed) the 3RR brightline. —''']''' (]) 18:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
''Uncivil comments may be deleted summarily.''
::What about the article itself. you did not address this issue. Let me say it again: the ancestry of al-bukhari is not agreed upon by Muslim scholars, neither early ones nor contemporary. and there are three opinions on the matter and historians have differed widely on the subject. I have re-written the article to reflect all points of view objectively and without bias. and then ] comes and reverts my chances as if he is the authority on the subject. I am not stating my own opinions, i'm stating the opinions of scholars in my edits. and he keeps reverting them like someone with an agenda. ] (]) 20:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
:::@] I am not convinced that any editor is acting in bad faith. To the extent that I am taking ''administrative action'' related to the article, I am not wading into the ''content discussions'' related to the article. Again, I reverted your edits to bring you out of violation of 3RR; I figured that was a better solution than blocking your account. Do you think I erred in that decision? —''']''' (]) 20:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC)


== Keep improving == == Hello ==


I am reverting the deleted articles because the guy who nominated them (who is the same person) has demonstrated a clesr bias against survivor pages and a lack of regard for winners and that their pages are meant to stay ] (]) 21:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Regarding with the topic:] .
While before me classmate is not familiar with the function of wiki and they dont put much reference. However, we are working on this and please share you tips with us to improve the creditability. Why we want to share is just because this is a new topic of our univeristy course and just taught by our professor. We want to share our view and collection of studies while gather other knowledge as well as learn from each others. Please give your helpful hand. We are not promoting anything and just want to share and build knowledge.


:@] The community feels otherwise, based on the respective discussions. See your talk page. —''']''' (]) 21:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
== You're FAST! ==
::"The community" you cant call a barley attened afd started by a guy with a bias against them doesnt coint as comminity ] (]) 21:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
:::Could you help me set some deletion reviews up? I have no idea how too ] (]) 14:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
::::@] What part of the ] instructions is unclear? —''']''' (]) 02:29, 5 January 2025 (UTC)


== Administrators' newsletter – January 2025 ==
When they say "speedy delete," you really mean business. Thanks for your vigilance!] (]) 05:22, 7 March 2008 (UTC)


] from the past month (December 2024).
p.s. am i improving a bit? i notice you're doing mop-up behind me. and for that i am thankful. ] (]) 07:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)


<div style="display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap">
== Muleko ==
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">


] '''Administrator changes'''
hey im not agree with the delete of my article muleko, there are things that doesnt exist yet, there are feelings which dont have name yet, and we can create them, stop reading history and start to make it, is this real 💕?, why do i have to write on somebody elses articles. this is not neutral <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 23:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned2 -->
:] ]
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}


] '''CheckUser changes'''
== Oops! ==
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] ]
:] ]


</div>
I guess our friend with the hot dog cart wasn't aware that the user whose page he chose to vandalize happens to be in control of the "block user" tab. :) Can't say we didn't try. Best, --] (]) 03:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
<div style="flex: 1 0 20em">
]


] '''Oversight changes'''
*Fred, you're one of the good ones, even during this rather stressful season here in the good old USA. :) Have a cookie. --] (]) 04:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
:] {{hlist|class=inline

|]
</noinclude><div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]
|]

|]
] (]) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! <br />
|]

|]
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{tls|Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
}}
</div><!-- Template:Cookie -->
:] ]

Yeah, buddy! That "April 15" jumped off the page. Please stay sane. Cookies help oodles. --] (]) 04:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

LOL! Gee, I might have to ask Jimbo to give back the mop and broom I gave up. Seems like the perks have gotten a lot better, even if some of the users are still a bit odd at times. --] (]) 04:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

== y did u block? Did u look 1st ?] ==

I thought u r busy with your taxes? I guess u mean ''I'm 2 busy 2 bee attentive 2 detail so I'll block arbitrarily''.<br>
Did u look? The info is reliable and has reliable sources. I was in the process of adding the < ref> but the damn bot kept interjecting so I had 2 keep going back & undoing so I could see where 2 add the < ref> to! How r my changes vandalisation? I did cleanup, & made the info clearer. The info I added has sources. What is the spam that the bot has a problem with ? ] (]) 15:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

== Sources on ] ==


</div>
Well, the ]'s archives have been up and down, but I promise you that the article exists in print form. Also, I found a copy of the msnbc article . —] (]/]) 23:16, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
</div>


] '''Guideline and policy news'''
== Declination of ] and ] ==
* Following ], ] was adopted as a ].
* A ] is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
] '''Technical news'''
* The Nuke feature also now ] to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.


] '''Arbitration'''
Hi C.Fred,
* Following the ], the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: {{noping|CaptainEek}}, {{noping|Daniel}}, {{noping|Elli}}, {{noping|KrakatoaKatie}}, {{noping|Liz}}, {{noping|Primefac}}, {{noping|ScottishFinnishRadish}}, {{noping|Theleekycauldron}}, {{noping|Worm That Turned}}.


] '''Miscellaneous'''
I just wanted to stop by and thank you for stopping by the deletion discussion and explaining a bit about your reasons for declining the speedy tag. Given the user's history of trying to put himself on Misplaced Pages I'm inclined to think that they were trying to simply host rather than improve the page in their userspace, but I see where you're coming from. Thanks! --]-]] 01:04, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
* A ] is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the ]. ]


----
== Amalaki ==
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 15:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1266956718 -->


== Lemons drop ==
Hey Fred - improved material for Amalaki is not self-published; it is the html version of the same monograph published in a textbook by Caldecott called "Ayurveda: The Divine Science of Life", in 2006 by medical/scientific publisher Mosby/Elsevier. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned2 -->


This is an English sweet so why do you feel American English should apply ] (]) 12:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)


:@] Because the article is written in American English. —''']''' (]) 14:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
==Thanks==


== modification cancelled ==
Thanks a lot. Your senseless and baseless criticism of my wikipedia entry concerning IMPACT- Charlottesville has proven that wikipedia is not, in fact, a public encyclopedia that encourages everyone to contribute sensible, informative and interesting articles. I believe as an administrator you have a duty to engender an ethos of contribution, not lambast it with non-existent local clauses. You spend way too much time on your computer and not enough in the real world and in short, are unworthy of such a position. I will immediately lodge a complaint with whatever authorities hold you responsible, and if that does not work, your fellow peers. ] (]) 17:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


*I merely try to establish the fact that you sir, are an idiot, sir and unworthy of whatever title this sycophantic community has bestowed on you. ] (]) 18:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC) Hi, can I ask you why my change was cancelled by you? ] (]) 17:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)


:@] For obviously going against consensus and concealing relevant information from the article. —''']''' (]) 17:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
**] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive comments. <br> If you continue to make personal attacks on other people{{#if:|&#32;as you did at ]}}, you '''will''' be ] for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npa4 -->
::I understand your point, however, I believe the information I previously removed, and which was later reinserted by you, is quite irrelevant. There does not appear to be any connection between the police officer's skin colour and the homicide committed by him. ] (]) 17:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
] (]) 18:14, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
:::@] This has been discussed before, and consensus is that it is rather relevant. —''']''' (]) 17:30, 12 January 2025 (UTC)


== ] ==
== Woit/Stinkdiagram ==


The user's got a visible ], seeing as he has edited no other page whatsoever. The first few diffs are worrying and have escalated to "revert-on-sight". ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 18:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC) I recalled that you previously blocked this ip for edit warring and has resumed edit Warring using an different ip see ] ] (]) 01:13, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:33, 15 January 2025

Welcome to my talk page.
  • Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.
  • Please add a new thread to the bottom of the page if you wish to leave me a new message. If you're following up on a previous message, keep your comment in that same place:
    • If you leave me a message here, I will reply here and {{Mention}} you here or leave a {{Talkback}} template on your talk page, unless you indicate that you are watching my page or no talkback message is necessary.
    • If you are responding to a message I left on your talk page, please reply there so the discussion stays in one place. Please {{Mention}} me in the message there or leave a {{Talkback}} template here so I know about the message, unless I indicate that no talkback is necessary in my message. If you are commenting here on a message or warning I left there, don't be surprised if I move the discussion back to your talk page.
  • This page is set for automatic archiving every 7 days. I will remove talkback messages as acknowledgment that I have read the related reply, and I reserve the right to summarily remove any uncivil comments or frivolous warnings.
Thank you, and happy editing!
Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Regarding Al-Bukhari.

Hello threre, regarding my edits on Al-Bukhari article, first of all i am not the one who started this editing war. hence i am not sure why you're reverting my changes. the matter of the fact is that the ancestry of al-bukhari is not agreed upon by Muslim scholars, neither early ones nor contemporary. and there are three opinions on the matter and historians have differed widely on the subject. I have re-written the article to reflect all points of view objectively and without bias. so what's the problem here? Bakkouz (talk) 17:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

@Bakkouz You are the one who is at (or has actually crossed) the 3RR brightline. —C.Fred (talk) 18:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
What about the article itself. you did not address this issue. Let me say it again: the ancestry of al-bukhari is not agreed upon by Muslim scholars, neither early ones nor contemporary. and there are three opinions on the matter and historians have differed widely on the subject. I have re-written the article to reflect all points of view objectively and without bias. and then User:شاه عباس comes and reverts my chances as if he is the authority on the subject. I am not stating my own opinions, i'm stating the opinions of scholars in my edits. and he keeps reverting them like someone with an agenda. Bakkouz (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
@Bakkouz I am not convinced that any editor is acting in bad faith. To the extent that I am taking administrative action related to the article, I am not wading into the content discussions related to the article. Again, I reverted your edits to bring you out of violation of 3RR; I figured that was a better solution than blocking your account. Do you think I erred in that decision? —C.Fred (talk) 20:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello

I am reverting the deleted articles because the guy who nominated them (who is the same person) has demonstrated a clesr bias against survivor pages and a lack of regard for winners and that their pages are meant to stay Wwew345t (talk) 21:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

@Wwew345t The community feels otherwise, based on the respective discussions. See your talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 21:03, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
"The community" you cant call a barley attened afd started by a guy with a bias against them doesnt coint as comminity Wwew345t (talk) 21:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Could you help me set some deletion reviews up? I have no idea how too Wwew345t (talk) 14:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
@Wwew345t What part of the WP:Deletion review instructions is unclear? —C.Fred (talk) 02:29, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).

Administrator changes

added Sennecaster
readded
removed

CheckUser changes

added
readded Worm That Turned
removed Ferret

Oversight changes

added
readded Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Lemons drop

This is an English sweet so why do you feel American English should apply Sharnadd (talk) 12:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

@Sharnadd Because the article is written in American English. —C.Fred (talk) 14:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

modification cancelled

Hi, can I ask you why my change was cancelled by you? Slancio2 (talk) 17:23, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

@Slancio2 For obviously going against consensus and concealing relevant information from the article. —C.Fred (talk) 17:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
I understand your point, however, I believe the information I previously removed, and which was later reinserted by you, is quite irrelevant. There does not appear to be any connection between the police officer's skin colour and the homicide committed by him. Slancio2 (talk) 17:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
@Slancio2 This has been discussed before, and consensus is that it is rather relevant. —C.Fred (talk) 17:30, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/104.173.25.23

I recalled that you previously blocked this ip for edit warring and has resumed edit Warring using an different ip see Special:Contributions/74.87.19.246 Untamed1910 (talk) 01:13, 15 January 2025 (UTC)