| Revision as of 20:43, 15 March 2008 editGimmeBot (talk | contribs)Bots75,273 editsm GimmeBot updating {{ArticleHistory}}← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:27, 2 November 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,833,983 editsm Category:List-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings: -Start, keep List; cleanupTag: AWB |
| (9 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Article history |
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
|
|action1=FLC |
|
|action1=FLC |
|
|action1date=18:35, 22 May 2006 |
|
|action1date=18:35, 22 May 2006 |
| Line 14: |
Line 14: |
|
|currentstatus=FFL |
|
|currentstatus=FFL |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{WikiProject Anime and manga |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=List|listas=Planetes episodes| |
|
|
{{WikiProject Anime and manga| importance=low}} |
|
| class=list |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Television |episode-coverage=yes |auto=Inherit |importance=Low}} |
|
| listas=Planetes episodes |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Science Fiction |importance=Low}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Airdates== |
|
==Airdates== |
| Line 36: |
Line 36: |
|
:Done. --] 16:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
:Done. --] 16:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Actually this has been done per discussion at (as opposed to the outdated link above), but good work Ali'i. ] <small><font color="red">(aka ])</font></small> 16:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
::Actually this has been done per discussion at (as opposed to the outdated link above), but good work Ali'i. ] <small><span style="color: red;">(aka ])</span></small> 16:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::Yes, sorry 'bout that. --] 17:07, 1 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
:::Yes, sorry 'bout that. --] 17:07, 1 May 2007 (UTC) |
| Line 50: |
Line 50: |
|
Please replace the images, this page is only a violation of a disputed reading of our policies. The only consensus that exists about this is that we are not going to change our rules to prohibit images in lists like this. See ]. - ] 21:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
Please replace the images, this page is only a violation of a disputed reading of our policies. The only consensus that exists about this is that we are not going to change our rules to prohibit images in lists like this. See ]. - ] 21:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Needless to say I and many other editors disagree. As you well know, there is a lengthy discussion underway about this at ] where you are welcome to make your voice heard. I would just note that your notion that there is not a consensus is irrelevant in that we are enforcing Foundation policies. As many have pointed out, if a proper Fair Use rationale is added for an image, the image is specifically described in the text and a minimal number of images are used, then this is alright. However, a list with pictures that are not even mentioned by the text is a decorative use and this is expressly forbidden by our Fair Use policy. Just because enforcement has been neglected on this article until now does not mean that this list of images is any more justifiable. Meanwhile, I suggest further discussion is made at AN. ] <small><font color="red">(aka ])</font></small> 21:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
:Needless to say I and many other editors disagree. As you well know, there is a lengthy discussion underway about this at ] where you are welcome to make your voice heard. I would just note that your notion that there is not a consensus is irrelevant in that we are enforcing Foundation policies. As many have pointed out, if a proper Fair Use rationale is added for an image, the image is specifically described in the text and a minimal number of images are used, then this is alright. However, a list with pictures that are not even mentioned by the text is a decorative use and this is expressly forbidden by our Fair Use policy. Just because enforcement has been neglected on this article until now does not mean that this list of images is any more justifiable. Meanwhile, I suggest further discussion is made at AN. ] <small><span style="color: red;">(aka ])</span></small> 21:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
::The '''work''' needs to be described in the text. We don't need the text to say "this screenshot". A screenshot is similar to a quotation from a longer text - the quotation can be used to illustrate a relevant point without saying "this quotation". --] 17:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
::The '''work''' needs to be described in the text. We don't need the text to say "this screenshot". A screenshot is similar to a quotation from a longer text - the quotation can be used to illustrate a relevant point without saying "this quotation". --] 17:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
::Also, the idea that the images can be replaced with anything is rather silly. --] 05:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC) |
|
::Also, the idea that the images can be replaced with anything is rather silly. --] 05:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC) |
It's been a while since I've looked at this article, and I gotta say... I liked it a LOT better with individual images for each episode. I noticed no discussion was brought up for this, not that it seems controversial or anything. The layout with individual images became the inspiration for many other articles I worked on, and I don't understand the reasoning to change it. I'm assuming related concerns such as this had something to do with it? I'm of the opinion of the others who found this table way to chunky, and even though the image use (of BOTH DVD covers and individual episode images) is in hot dispute, I'm going to be bold and reformat it. From the featured list discussion, it does not seem this would break it's status.. If it does please revert my edits, and I will bring it up for further discussion. -- Ned Scott 12:19, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
