Misplaced Pages

User talk:Elonka: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:13, 23 March 2008 editKellyAna (talk | contribs)6,723 edits →Thank you for trying: m← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:42, 22 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,294,330 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Elonka/Archive 45) (bot 
Line 1: Line 1:

{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{administrator}}{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 50K
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|counter = 14
|maxarchivesize = 300K
|algo = old(30d)
|counter = 45
|algo = old(5d)
|archive = User talk:Elonka/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:Elonka/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
{| align="right" cellpadding="5" style="background:none;"
{{archives|auto=yes}}

{{tocright}}

== Brian D Foy/brian d foy ==

Hi Elonka, would you care to join us or at least have an eye on ]? The whole thing is probably just another routine quarrel on formatting, but I do get a little tense once opposing editors feel the need to point out their admin status, so having another sysops wielder around for checks and balances might considerably improve the climate over there. – ] <sup>(])</sup> 07:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

== PWNO ==

Elonka, I don't wish to distrub thee too much from the time-sucking thing that is the ], but I fear your moderating voice is needed for the ]. Things had gotten good for a while, but there are signs that it may go back to its old ways. I refer you to comments such as and . As Piotrus has let such comments go, I'm requesting you to put in a word. All the best, ] (<small>]</small>) 22:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
: Sorry, I'd love to help, but I'm currently traveling, and just snatching a few minutes here and there for Misplaced Pages, while perched in my hotel room. If you think things are bad enough, you could try taking it to ANI. Or if not, I'll try to take a look when I'm back home again. Good luck, ]]] 22:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

:: Just don't want things to return to their old ways. Enjoy your trip! ] (<small>]</small>) 22:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

== Kaaba ==

Hi, You had ] voted to support a Kaaba picture at FPC. An edit has been made to that picture and is up for voting again. I would be pleased if you could please vote for it. Regards, ]] 14:31, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

== ] ==

I wondered why your has a misleading edit summary suggesting it was merely ] cleanup. The addition of ] could be considered as such, but you also added alternative capitalisations to the lede as expressly forbidden in the start of ], re-ordered many entries without explanation (not that I actually wish to dispute that), removed redlinks and their most relevant wikilinks for reasons I can't fathom, added entries and increased the length of some entries by re-writing them into ]s describing the words rather than the concepts (as is expected in an encyclopedia).

] ] ] 12:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
: Well first, ] is a guideline, not a policy. I reviewed my changes but don't see exactly which problems that you're referring to. In any case, on Misplaced Pages, if you see something you would like to change, the best way to deal with things is usually to just change it, not to chase after the previous editor who was on the page. There are preferred methods of doing things, but that doesn't mean that they're required. Either way, your change seems fine, it could really be done either way. --]]] 19:05, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

== ] ==

I imagine you're already aware of the baloney going on around this article, but I thought I'd alert you just in case. I've already deleted some of the dreck on the talk page per ] but it's been reinstated. Several good quality editors now have an eye on this article so there's a limit to how far the nonsense will be allowed to go. Cheers. --] (]) 13:21, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
: Thanks for the heads-up, and I'm glad to hear that others are keeping an eye on it. I'm still going to be traveling off and on for the next week or two, and my wiki-time is severely curtailed. Looks like I'll have lots of !entertaining reading to do when I get back! :) --]]] 18:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
::That certainly sounds like our old friend Dr B. (I'm not the only one to think so either ). --] (]) 19:52, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
:::Update: blocked indefinitely by Moreschi . Dr. B and his possible imitators are already indef. blocked so their socks can be instantly blocked too. --] (]) 20:03, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

== Request for Mediation ==

Hi Elonka, I was sent here by ] because I had a dispute about an edit at the ] page ( here is a link to the diff). He deleted a large amount of text that I feel didn't need to be deleted. I explain my stance in the talk page. I already undid his edit, then he redid it, and I dont' want to get into an "undo" war, so if you could help me it would be much appreciated! Thanks!--] (]) 14:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

== In theory... ==

My ISP has fixed my issues. Note I said in theory. Things seem to be working for now... we'll see what happens. ] | ] 21:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

== Thanks for the kind words ==

I appreciate the kind words. Honestly, I'm just a kid playing with a new toy, ] --<span style="border:1px solid #63B8FF; font-weight:bold; color:#23238E; background-color:#D0E7FF;"> ] <sub> ] ] </sub> </span> 05:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

== Sockpuppet hunt ==

<small>(This relates to your question to ])</small>

Howdy,

If you're looking for ], yes he's the creator of the French version of the Boubouleix article. IP 86.207.56.195 also intervened, as well as the 4 IP and users below. No other contributor of significance.

FYI: ], ] and ] are all sockpuppets of one another (+IP 86.207.121.187), but seem to be distinct from G.S. (we ran a Check User on them names, see ]).

Hope this helps! Cheers, ] <sup>]</sup> 10:14, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
:what he said :) ] x 11:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
:: Thanks! :) --]]] 16:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

== G. Smith incident ==

It was a very strange incident. Both the main perpetrators, Geir Smith and Dominique Boubouleix (plus his various socks), have been banned from Misplaced Pages. They posted some bizarre conspiracy theory rants about you here and on the French Misplaced Pages. You can see the unfolding saga at ]. We concluded that Smith was a crank who was trolling for hits for his website(s). He was desperate to get PHG on his side but we haven't found evidence that PHG was involved in any way. As Dbachmann said: "it transpires that is embraced as a brother in arms by the Warriors of Shambhala because he is in dispute with Elonka. I am sure he will be nonplussed to learn of his popularity among the Immortals". Cheers. --] (]) 10:29, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
:"My CIA handlers will be pleased". Boubouleix's sock puppet "Lord Hearntown" also alleged you were really Jewish and a Mossad agent on French Misplaced Pages (since blanked). I haven't kept track of PHG's editing history in detail but we found no on-wiki evidence of collaboration between him and Smith, so I have no idea whether he's been inducted into the Warrior Cult of Shambhala, knowingly or unknowingly. This whole episode has been the strangest I have encountered on Misplaced Pages and has left me wondering about the quality of mental health care in France. --] (]) 16:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)


== Dirty Dancing ==

Let me know if you want me to look at the article. I'm certainly not the greatest FAC reveiwer, but I can usually see where something is unclear. Normally I don't do "modern" stuff much, things past the Reformation bore me usually. ] | ] 04:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
:ah, and I keep forgetting about this resource, you can dig around at ]. ] (]) 04:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
:I'll try to get to it tomorrow. I do most of my reviewing in the morning while my eyes are still fresh and I can face the task of being utterly picky. (grins). ] | ] 04:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

:There, later than I hoped (stupid Daylight savings time change always annoys me) but got it done. I put a few questions/concerns/suggestions up on the talk page. Hopefully it helps. ] | ] 01:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

== RE: Request for review ==

Thanks for the message Elonka. Arabo-Norman civilization did not exist... and a quick Google search for the term shows the Misplaced Pages article as the only result. It should be speedy redirected to ]... because that is the time period in which Sicily went from been a Muslim country, to once against a Christian country (under the Normans). I'll redirect it myself due to it been a completely invented term. - ] (]) 09:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

== Priory of Sion ==

Hello Elonka! Congratulations on becoming a Misplaced Pages administrator! Would you have the time and interest in collaborating with me to improve the ] article enough to meet ]? --] (]) 10:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

:By the way, I recently did some tweaking of the ] article. Did you have any comments? --] (]) 10:23, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
:: Hi, I saw that you'd been working on it, yes. Though I didn't review the edits in detail, because I know that you know what you're talking about, so I trust you to put in good material. :) When I get a chance, I'll go in and look in more detail. The ] project sounds like a good one too, I'll definitely help as I can, though right now my time is a bit crunched. I've been sick with the flu for a couple weeks, and when I do have time (and health) for Misplaced Pages, my attention has mainly been on ]. It's in voting phase now, but even after it's done, there are a ] (some of them Templar-related) that are going to need complex cleanup. I am also trying to get '']'' to FA, and will be submitting it for another Peer Review soon, and probably FA again next week. But if you still need help on Priory of Sion after I get those projects off my plate, yes, I'll definitely help out! :) --]]] 19:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

:::Thank you. I'm currently satisfied with the current content of the Priory of Sion. The help I need is with standardizing the citing of sources. Anyway, take care of yourself. --] (]) 03:24, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

== Dated sub-cats ==

Essentially the templates need to be tweaked, and the sub cats created. There's a few bits of admin too, but that's the crux. I'll have a look at it. ''] ]'', 21:29 ] ] (GMT).
:Basically done. ''] ]'', 22:41 ] ] (GMT).

== Sorkhagtni bekh ==

Dear Elonka and Friends,

I read the secret history of mongols 3 times. Because I am mongol. Although I am a financer, i love medieval history especially mongolian.

I think the right spell for her name is Sorkhagtni but not Sorgaghtni. I think mongols did not use K instead of Kh or H in early times. '''K''' is foreign letter for us. For example, people call some names such as Kublai, Kaidu (or Qaidu)and more. Mongols call them Khubilai and Khaidu in mongolian.

Thank you!

] <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:34, 12 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== longissimam agnoscere veritatis viam ==

]: your recommendation at ] seems sound. Would you mind, however, proposing the redirects ] and ] for speedy deletion by way of <tt>{{]}}</tt>? These are ordinary Latin infinitives with many other uses. ] (]) 14:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks. The solution for ] and ] is good. ] (]) 18:24, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

== ] ==

This Arbitration case is closed and the final decision has been published at the link above. {{user|PHG}} is prohibited from editing articles relating to medieval or ancient history for a period of one year. He is permitted to make suggestions on talk pages, provided that he interacts with other editors in a civil fashion. PHG is reminded that in contributing to Misplaced Pages (including his talkpage contributions, contributions in other subject-matter areas, and contributions after the one-year editing restriction has expired), it is important that all sourced edits must fairly and accurately reflect the content of the cited work taken as a whole. PHG is also reminded that Misplaced Pages is a collaborative project and it is essential that all editors work towards compromise and a neutral point of view in a good-faith fashion. When one editor finds themselves at odds with most other editors on a topic, it can be disruptive to continue repeating the same argument. After suggestions have been properly considered and debated, and possible options considered, if a consensus is clear, the collegial and cooperative thing to do is to acknowledge the consensus, and move on to other debates.

PHG is encouraged to continue contributing to Misplaced Pages and Wikimedia projects in other ways, including by suggesting topics for articles, making well-sourced suggestions on talkpages, and continuing to contribute free-content images to Wikimedia Commons.

For the Arbitration committee, ] 01:07, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

: Wow, while my mind was on other things, somebody just quietly got on with a very careful and well researched job, and got a result that will help raise the quality of Misplaced Pages's medieval studies articles. Well done, Elonka. --] 17:22, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

== User:KellyAna ==

Hi, don't want to bother you, but you're an Admin now &mdash; with that and your vast experience (and participation in WP:SOAPS), I'd like your advice on how to deal with ]. I have just hit my limit with her behavior and misguided edits. As you may know, she does not accept criticism or advice, but I am hoping there is an official way to get through to her. Her edit summaries and history and behavior on her own talk page (she ignores or deletes critical comments because they're placed "in the wrong place" on her page) should prove my case alone, but there are also several editors I feel she has terrorized and steamrolled lately and their interaction would also be illuminating. Please advise. &mdash; ]<sup>]</sup> 03:41, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
:Hi Elonka. I have previously warned this user several times for her edit-warring, falsely labelling good-faith edits as vandalism, a technical problem with her user talk page, etc. Because of the idiosyncratic way she 'archives' her user talk, you may want to read the history, from about on to get a picture. Best wishes, and I hope adminship is suiting you. --] (]) 04:40, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
::] may also be of interest. --] (]) 04:47, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
:::Thanks Elonka, as always ... I have never felt the need to intervene with an editor like this before, so I appreciate your advice. I of course don't wish to get KellyAna "in trouble" or even blocked, but hope to somehow get her to listen to reason. I do plan to post a detailed comment on her talk page, and amass links to the various recent situations I feel have been a problem (like John's, above). I may even ask you to look it over before I post it, so expect me to get back in touch ;). Thanks again. &mdash; ]<sup>]</sup> 05:09, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

== Barnstar of Diligence ==

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence'''
|- |-
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your work in ensuring historical accuracy across a wide range of articles, I award you this Barnstar of Diligence. ''']''' <small>]</small> 17:21, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
{{archives|auto=yes|search=yes}}
|} |}
{{tocleft}}{{-}}


== Nonsensical ==


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
A comment that makes no sense is nonsensical and I have a right to remove anything from my page that I don't understand the wording of. It is not "uncivil" it is fact. Have people speak in normal English and I'll not remove their comments. Comments that makes no sense will be removed as "nonsensical." ] (]) 03:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
:And how is it I can be called INSANE and that editor doesn't get a warning but I remove a nonsensical comment and I get a civility warning? Double standard much? ] (]) 03:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
::Apparently your warning to TAnthony went unheeded. I removed it from my talk page because you told us to stop but you can see his personal attack within my history. ] (]) 16:21, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
== The Real G-Unit BarnStar! ==
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Fraternity/Sorority Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For being apart of WikiProject Freemasonry! '''] 05:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
|}


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
: Erm, thanks, but I'm not comfortable accepting a barnstar just for belonging to a WikiProject. I'd rather know that I actually ''did'' something to deserve it. --]]] 05:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


</div>
== Crusades task force ==
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 -->


== Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards ==
Hi Elonka, I've created a ] as part of the Middle Ages WikiProject, which I thought you might be interested in. ] (]) 09:46, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


Voting is now open for the ] ] and ] awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes ] and ] respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via ] (]) 23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
== Request to amend ] ==
<!-- Message sent by User:Hawkeye7@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members/Active&oldid=1259903100 -->


== Administrators' newsletter – December 2024 ==
Hi Elonka. I hope you've been keeping well and enjoying your new shiny buttons :)


] from the past month (November 2024).
Just letting you know that I've filed a request to amend the Franco-Mongol alliance case, mainly the restriction on PHG and medieval or ancient history. Your comments at ] would be much appreciated. Cheers, ] (]) 10:03, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


]
== Your new, er, friend ==


] '''Administrator changes'''
Ok noted. Do you have a policy here on :en that allows you to ban people whose username translates into ''asshole'' and clearly state that they're not coming to help? I guess that'd save you a loooot of time :-)
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}


] '''Interface administrator changes'''
Cheers, ] <sup>]</sup> 20:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] ]


] '''CheckUser changes'''
== Rude people ==
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}


] '''Guideline and policy news'''
. Basically I told him to get off my page if he was going to be rude "clean your glasses" but you've asked me to play nice with others. How is this possible when people attack you just for questioning an uploaded picture. Seriously, I asked TAnthony and he even agreed the picture was not Lorenzo Lamas. ] (]) 01:24, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
* Following ], the ] has been updated. All former administrators may now only regain the tools following a request at the ] within 5 years of their most recent admin action. Previously this applied only to administrators deysopped for inactivity.
* Following a ], a new speedy deletion criterion, ], has been enacted. This applies to template subpages that are no longer used.


] '''Technical news'''
== Thanks! ==
* Technical volunteers can now register for the ], which will take place in Istanbul, Turkey. is open from November 12 to December 10, 2024.


] '''Arbitration'''
Hey Elonka. Thanks for blocking 98.194.118.152, I just found out they blanked my user page earlier. Mad Props!--'''] 16:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
* The arbitration case '']'' (formerly titled '']'') has been closed.
:: RE - Do it. That would be peachy. --'''] 17:25, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
* An arbitration case titled '']'' has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 14 December.


----
== ] ==
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 16:19, 3 December 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1259680487 -->
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
This article has unfortunately taken up far too much of my time at Misplaced Pages as of late, and I have no time these days to give to it. As it is, I'm limiting myself to one edit a day here since I've got a ridiculous amount of drawing to do in the next week and don't want to overuse my moneymakers typing unless I absolutely have to. Significant progress has been made on this article, but it's come at the price of hurt feelings and more than one editor deciding to leave the article. The current debate centers on an article from "Mount Holyoke News" independent student publication (which is the schools official newspaper I believe) and whether or not it is a reliable source. I've removed it from the ] article but it is still currently in the ] article.
<blockquote>'''I see no evidence of notability per NCORP.'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
Anyway, I'd really appreciate it if you could take a look at the current debate and maybe give some feedback on the source and the direction of the article. I've contacted you because I know that ] and ] (who has all but left the article) both hold you in high regards, and would rather solicit the advice of a friendly and familiar admin that take a crap shoot with the reliable sources noticeboard or filing an RFC. Thanks, Animate
:I'm breaking my own rule about posting once a day, but I'm dealing with a little insomnia and am hoping briefly dealing with this will get my mind off work and ready to shut down. Anyway, you should know that this isn't a huge conflict and none of the editing relationships are beyond repair. There are clear "sides" for lack of a better term, but I think (for the most part) everyone has been relatively civil, refactored uncivil comments, and apologized when necessary. The reason I contacted you, is because I think we just need an new set of uninvolved eyes. Right now, there are three or four editors going round and round in circles and it's not productive. I guess this is my own bastardized version of ] option in the dispute resolution process, and what better opinion than that of a fellow editor I know the other editors on the page trust implicitly. ] 10:16, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 22:54, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
== WP:USER rationale ==


== CIR issue with editor you warned once for lack of sources ==
Hello. Thank you for stating a rationale at .


See https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Proudbharati huge number of terrible changes, done in haste. ] ] 11:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
As wikipedia is a consensus system, it helps to record the rationale behind each decision and best practice, since people are required to supply such a rationale when asked for one. (else negotiation becomes rather difficult ;-) )


:Ignore, I CIR blocked. ] ] 12:52, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Could you please update ] with your information as well?

Thank you very much! :-)

--] (]) 19:57, 20 March 2008 (UTC) <small>''Meh, why does that sound like a template? Think of it this way: Update the page, and you might avoid having to answer that question again ;-)''</small>

==re: Advice==
The thing is, aside from being an utter ], I am not sure which of his ArbCom sanctions he would be violating. The same edit, offered over and over again wth naught but edit summaries to provide his reasoning is disruptive, sure. And yes, he is the ony one being disruptive in the article. And yes, he has at least one editor. I am not sure how - aside from being a disruptive lout - this is anything more than an AN/I complaint. I welcome your thoughts on how to proceed, though. People are getting fed up in the article, and I don't want more to walk away, afraid to comment. - ] ] 03:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)</small>


==Supercouples==
Hello Elonka, Thank you so much for agreeing to help out on the list of supercouples. Trouble is brewing again down to a conflict of views - as evidenced on AniMate's talk page. You expert guidance skills would be appreciated here! And yes, I need to control my temper....] (]) 21:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
:No, Elonka, trouble's not brewing, I'm too busy pulling my head out of my ass and trying to figure out how to deal with people in the real world to cause trouble on the article. Not that I need to tell you, but please view my talk page. ] (]) 21:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
::If my comment about how KellyAna dealing with people outside of Misplaced Pages crossed a line, I apologize, but I've noticed what seems to be a pattern of immediate incivility with people who she doesn't agree with. You say she's getting better, than I'll believe you. Still I think a reminder of what you said might be in order. ] 00:26, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
:::I wasn't "immediately incivil," I said I just couldn't go back to the page after Paul's insistence the lists must go. That's not uncivil, it's fact. You attacked me, my real life existence, my job, my personal interactions. I wasn't even talking to you and you attacked me. That's a fact that can't be swept under a rug by apologizing to a third party. And those conditions were to be upheld only if Elonka and I were to participate in the article. I gave a waiver and said I couldn't adhere because of Paul's comments and I wouldn't be participating. ] (]) 00:31, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
::::(ec)KellyAna you were immediately uncivil with me in our first interaction. You misinterpreted something I said and refused to accept my apology. I see multiple instances on your talk page of confrontations with other users. If I offended you I apologize, but your interactions with people at Misplaced Pages are problematic and I was merely wondering if you are so quick to fight in your "real" life. I'm guessing no. The thing about being anonymous on the 'net is that we say things we might not normally say in everyday life. I do it. You do it. Elonka and Paul both do it. It was a roundabout way of saying we should interact with each other as if we are sitting across from one another at a table. It was done inartfully, but it was not an attack and I again apologize for offending you. Please accept it.
::::Also, those conditions Elonka set out are conditions every single Wikipedian should follow no matter what is going on. ] 00:39, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
:::::That's an apology? ] (]) 00:44, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
::::::Yes. Again, I apologize if I offended you. ] 00:46, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
:::::::I don't accept what my mother called "back handed apologies" and that's what that was. I never attacked your personal life or being and you can't say the same. I left the article because you and Paul made it your mission to ruin it. I wanted out and you not only tried to pull me back you insulted me in the process. Paul did everything he could to bring me to tears. Your back handed whatever isn't enough. ] (]) 00:50, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
You have misinterpreted what I said. I never meant to insult your personal life. I am sorry for what I said. ]] 01:02, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Kelly, I can't speak for Paul, but AniMate sounds sincere. If AniMate isn't using words which properly convey that to you though, then the thing to do (per that ] thing I told you about), is for ''you'' to decide for yourself, "What would I need to hear from AniMate, to help improve our ability to communicate?" Instead of just saying, "You're not meeting my needs" (which is the "C" in the PAC at TA), the more adult way to handle things is to take the responsibility for communication of just what your needs are. Another way of describing it, is with a mother and a baby. If a baby has a wet diaper, the baby just cries, and it's up to the mother to try and deduce what the baby wants, and fix it. But what I'm trying to encourage you to do, is to deal with things in a different way. So instead of just "crying" (not saying that you are, I'm just using that as an analogy), imagine that you were a baby and you could say, "Um, mom, the diaper's wet again. I'd change it but I obviously don't have motor control (or reach past the crib walls here) to do it. Think you could take care of this for me? Thanks so much, I really appreciate it." :) --]]] 01:03, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
:Indeed I am sincere. I never want to hurt anyone's feelings. I do think you misinterpreted what I said, and I really am sorry. That being said, I still think all of the principles Elonka laid out on your talk page are things every single Wikipedian should follow every time they post. Paul certainly did not do that on my talk page, and Elonka correctly warned him. However, I do think incivility and not assuming good faith are real problems with you. We're discussing it here, and it's being discussed on your page by another admin. My mission has ''never'' been to ruin anything. All I've wanted is to collaborate with all sides in this and improve the article. ]] 01:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
::Here's what "pisses" me off. I asked weeks ago to get away from the article. I was happy, content to be away and some how someone tried to suck me back in and this happens. Do you see why I wanted out? I wanted nothing to do with any of it. Why did you do this to me? I wanted out, done, gone, bye, over, not to touch again because I can't deal with people like Paul. I don't appreciate this escalation over an article I stepped away from weeks ago. It's very unfair. ] (]) 01:31, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
:::The reason I asked you back is because I was unhappy that you left the article. I wanted to work with you and thought it possible that two people like us with vastly different opinions could work something out. It's as simple as that. No one should feel they have to flee an article. I was simply reaching out to see if maybe you would want to participate in something I knew you had cared about in the past. ]] 01:35, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
:::: Kelly, this is the internet, no one can force you to do anything you don't want to do. :) If you think someone is "coercing" you to do something, close the browser. :) Unplug the computer, walk away. You have complete control over what you do or don't do online. If you don't want to work on the article, don't. It's as simple as that. You don't need to justify, or explain, or react... Just go work on something you ''do'' want to work on. :) --]]] 01:49, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
::::(ec)Yeah, I cared about it but according to Paul's accusations I claimed to own it. I guarantee you I don't own that article and NEVER claimed to. I've always said that was Flyer's article and I just a contributor. I don't even know that it is you that would be "to blame" but rather Paul. I think maybe, but not necessarily likely, you, Flyer, and I might be able to work things through but Paul is the one I can't work with which is what I was replying to on your page. I just think it's better for me to not be involved because, quite honestly, the removal of the "notable wave" section infuriates me. I know me, I know when it's better to walk away. It was what was best for me and all involved for me to walk away. Look what happened tonight. I've made more enemies than friends tonight and it's all because of that stupid Supercouple list set me off. Just let me walk away. PLEASE. It's what I wanted weeks ago, it's what I still want. And what else I want is for Elonka to help me and this article isn't part of that agenda when the talk about it includes comments like "what planet" and "pull your head out." I just don't need that abuse, I have a teenager, I get enough abuse at home =)] (]) 01:51, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
::::::Well, I also apologise to KellyAna for my comments if it is any use. In defending myself in probably an undefenbisble situation is thyat you are increasing difficult to work with KellyAna. From the moment myself and AniMate came across this article, if you have been aggressive and uncivil. All i did was stumble across an article by sheer mistake that I thought needed some help. Correctly or incorrectly, I thought it didn't adhere to Misplaced Pages guidelines and thought it could be improved - AniMate obviously felt the same. I feel incredibly frustrated that every time we attempt to do something, you turn on us and cry foul. This is the reason why I suggested you behave as if you own the article. When I made one of my first edits to the article you left me a message saying something along the lines of "Thank you for experimenting on the List Of Supercouples article - please don't do it again, next time use the sandbox". That is not a very helpful attitude. It is this frustration of being able to get anywhere with you that lead me to lash out yesterday with some unkind language. I am sorry, it shouldn't have been said and yes I have problems control my temper. My apologies go out to you, AniMate, Elonka and everyone else involved. It was a stupid thing to do and did not advance the case any further. But KellyAna, please, no matter what I have said in the past can you try and be a little more flexible with us, and not shout us down everytime we say something? We are NOT trying to ruin this article, despite what you think. We are not the Wicked Witches of the West patrolling Misplaced Pages in an attempt to destroy things. We both just happened to see an article we thought needed help. OUR thoughts. No-one elses. Misplaced Pages is there to be read, used, edited and changed by everyone and we have the right to our own opinion. From day one both myself and AniMate have been confronted with rudeness and uncivility, but we have weathered the storm. If you could please accept that we have differing views and then we can all move on. And yes, I don't like lists - so what? Do you really think that means I will be a one man army that will destroy every list on the site? I really don;t have the time or inclination. By walking away from this list now, you are effectively giving control to the evil twins leaving us free to do whatever we want to the article, and I don't think you want that. :) Why don't you stick around, I don't care if you hate me, internet snipings don't bother me. Just please please try and accept that we all have different views and are not insidiously evil out to ruin things. ] (]) 11:31, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
::::::::No, Paul, anything and everything you say only makes things worse, as you've done here AGAIN. The message, ''{{vandal1}}'' is just a default message used by Misplaced Pages, it's a template not my words. If you'd been around as long as you claim, you should know that and not have taken it personally. What absolutely gauls me is I haven't even touched the article but to add one reference in a long time and when I repeated WHY I won't touch it, because of you and what you've done, you immediately attacked. You should have celebrated because I was stating I wasn't coming back and you could continue ruining the article to your hearts content. Why when I'm saying "I'll leave you to your destruction and won't interfere" are you still attacking me? I really think you need to look at the past conversations and stop attacking me for NOT PARTICIPATING. Stop dwelling and stop attacking me. And what "walking away now"??? I walked away WEEKS AGO so LEAVE ME ALONE and move on and go back to destroying the Supercouple list but LEAVE ME OUT OF IT. Your apology is not accepted as it is backhanded and lacks knowledge of my lack of involvement and lack of desire to be involved. ] (]) 15:13, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

== What the? ==
Any thoughts on this one? ?? IRC? Banned? Blocked because I'm pissy tonight but banned and what is IRC? Is this a joke? ] (]) 01:56, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

==DreamGuy at AE==
Not sure if you were aware of it, but I submitted a report on DreamGuy at ]. I am also not sure if you want to be involved with it, but perhaps you could tell me how long it takes for investigation/action to be taken on a submitted enforcement complaint. Either way, thanks for pointing me int he right direction with your comment on my User Talk page. - ] ] 17:48, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
: Heh, GMTA, I actually just posted. As for how long it takes to get action, it really depends who's watching the page. It might be worth posting a note at ANI, reminding the admins there to check the enforcement board since no one else seems to be watching it at the moment. If you do post at ANI, let me know and I'll weigh in too. --]]] 17:55, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Considering your long history of wikistalking me, Elonka, you know you shouldn't be getting involved here. But then you never seem to care. ] (]) 21:47, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
:: DreamGuy, the above comment is ], an assumption of ], and a violation of your ArbCom restrictions (see ]). Please, understand that I do see the ''good'' work that you do. I know you have expertise in certain topic areas, and I do see you working hard to fight spam and vandalism and POV-pushing, and I appreciate how much you care about Misplaced Pages. What I don't like though, is when you mistreat other editors, when you assume bad faith, and when you play fast and loose with the truth. When you are uncivil, you make Misplaced Pages a more unpleasant place to work. I also take exception with the way that you throw around terms such as "harassment" and "stalking". When you make false accusations like that, it makes situations more difficult to resolve. Even when you are being faced with rude behavior, it does not give you the right to be rude in return. And when people caution you about rude behavior, you most especially do not have the right to react to them with abusive comments and false accusations, and thereby further escalate the situation.

:: I wish that you could hear the good things that people say about what you do, and take enough pride in that, that you didn't have to react so defensively to the bad. I wish that you could acknowledge your temper, and say, "I'm sorry, I shouldn't have said that, I'm going to try and do better in the future." If you could do that, I think you would find an enormous number of people here who would be eager to put aside old grievances, and genuinely try to give you another chance. Apologies can be powerful. I wish you would consider one once in awhile. --]]] 23:15, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

== Thank you for trying ==

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Peace'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For grace under fire and for effortless diplomacy in tense situations. ]] 23:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
|}
Your "Dancing With the Stars" analogy was dead on. I know how much effort goes in to playing referee with two people bound and determined to piss each other off, but... you make it look easy. Cheers. ]] 00:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
:Not to butt in on the barnstar but if you REALLY think '''I''' was "bound and determined to piss Paul off" then you are sorely wrong. You came to me, I came back and said why I had to decline and then he attacked, as did you AniMate. How exactly does that make me "bound and determined to piss him off?" ] (]) 01:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
:: Erm, Kelly, she didn't mention you. I work with other disputes, too. :) In fact, if you look at my contribs, I think you'll find some things that you might find interesting. --]]] 01:10, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
:::Well, I was the only one she was "involved" with. LOL. Believe me, I know you deserve the Barnstar. If I knew how to create one you'd get the "BARNSTAR FOR PUTTING UP WITH PAINS IN THE ASS" which is one you really need. =) I've admired your work for months since the Pauleen Fowler article. Didn't mean to rain on your parade. ] (]) 01:53, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
:::: Heh. Well, I could link you to a page that shows how to create Barnstars, but I shudder to think what the graphic might look like for that particular one. ;) "I hereby award you the Hemorrhoid Barnstar".... :) --]]] 02:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
:::::Actually, it's not that bad. This is what I thought would be appropriate (you get to throw little Ninja stars at me and those like me =)
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Putting up with the Likes of Me'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For putting up with all of us that try your patience and make you want to pull your hair out but who really do appreciate your efforts, grace, understanding, and patience.
] (]) 02:09, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
|}
The other option was:
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Putting up with Crabby People'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For putting up with all of us that try your patience and make you want to pull your hair out but really do appreciate you.
] (]) 02:13, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
|}

Latest revision as of 15:42, 22 December 2024


Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45


This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.


ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

added
readded Pppery

CheckUser changes

readded

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Games, Learning & Society Conference

Notice

The article Games, Learning & Society Conference has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I see no evidence of notability per NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 22:54, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

CIR issue with editor you warned once for lack of sources

See https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Proudbharati huge number of terrible changes, done in haste. Doug Weller talk 11:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Ignore, I CIR blocked. Doug Weller talk 12:52, 20 December 2024 (UTC)