Misplaced Pages

Origin of life: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:35, 26 March 2008 editWikidSmaht (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers2,819 edits They generally INCLUDE the origin of life( as that article says), and it is not reasonable to expect that people looking for information about the origin of life are looking for one over the other.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:22, 20 February 2023 edit undoFinnusertop (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users89,190 editsNo edit summary 
(12 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT]
Information regarding the '''origin of life''' falls into two distinct and often contradictory categories:
{{r mentioned in hatnote}}
*See ] for scientific theories on the origin of life
*See ] for religious views on the origin of life
<!--Alphabetical; though I prefer the scientific explanation, I have not given it primacy simply due to my beliefs, so don’t complain.-->
{{dab}}

Latest revision as of 10:22, 20 February 2023

Redirect to:

  • Mentioned in a hatnote: This is a redirect from a title that is mentioned in a hatnote at the redirect target. The mention is usually atop the target article. It may, however, be directly under a section header, or in another article's hatnote (whenever the hatnote is under a section, {{R to section}} should also be used).
    • The titles of redirects mentioned in hatnotes may refer to a subject other than that of the target page. It is possible that this redirect may need to be retargeted, or become an article under its own title (see {{R with possibilities}}). If the title is a good candidate for a Wiktionary link, it may also be added.