| Revision as of 18:30, 2 April 2008 editWhatamIdoing (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers122,218 edits →Archive: Split sections← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 09:46, 10 July 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,013,463 editsm Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)Tag: paws [2.2] |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBanners| |
|
|
{{Rational Skepticism|class=B|attention=yes}} |
|
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Alternative medicine|class=B}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Skepticism|importance=mid|attention=}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Alternative medicine}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Alternative Views|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=Low}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{Reliable sources for medical articles}} |
|
{{Calm talk with tea}} |
|
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
{{archive box| |
|
|
|
|target=Talk:Orthomolecular medicine/Archive index |
|
* ] |
|
|
|
|mask=Talk:Orthomolecular medicine/Archive <#> |
|
* ] |
|
|
|
|leading_zeros=0 |
|
* ] |
|
|
|
|indexhere=yes}} |
|
* ] |
|
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
* ] |
|
|
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 200K |
|
|
|counter = 10 |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 4 |
|
|
|algo = old(100d) |
|
|
|archive = Talk:Orthomolecular medicine/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
__FORCETOC__ |
|
|
|
|
: |
|
|
==Archive== |
|
|
I've archived the enormous talk page, using the "move page" method to preserve the edit history. Let's start over, with a clean slate. Maybe we could discuss something simple, like whether #Orthomolecular doctors and #Orthomolecular scientists could be merged, before getting back to the complications of writing a perfect lead. ] (]) 05:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Notable== |
|
|
:"Notable OM Drs & Scientists" would be okay with me. I prefer the 3-4 column format, too.--] (]) 12:09, 2 April 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::What do you think about "Notable supporters"? The word "doctor" makes me itch, because it can legitimately include PhDs, but is usually received as "licensed physicians." ] (]) 18:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Lead== |
|
|
I also agree that leaving the lead alone for a while in the form approved by the RfC is an excellent idea. ] (]) 17:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Thanks for your prompt attention, I said 2 days off. I thought we should try a more neutral, less injurious version on for size, we could still talk. The "faddism" and "quackery" are not acceptable lede material, they are ] attacks given ] weight often based on highly flawed allegations & distortions, even trivially obvious in the scientific senses. Because of the historical facts on major OMM areas, although I will agree that vitriolic critics are notable in the general sense, their inflammatory misrepresentions & coverage promoting distortions & scientific misconduct that scientifically & commercially interferes & unfairly deprecates others' legitimate results should be discussed where there is space for balancing quotes, references and reader's (yawn) voluntary continued interest.--] (]) 17:44, 2 April 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==AMA discussion== |
|
|
In response to your concerns about the inclusion of this source, I have posted a question at the ] so people can discuss the issue. ] (]) 17:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
:I think that is premature, as I said since the AMA doesn't even state "orthomlecular" anywhere that is ] or offtopic. Also many editors *are* AMA members or unfamiliar with the underlying issues that especially concern orthomolecular medicine.--] (]) 17:44, 2 April 2008 (UTC) |
|
