| Revision as of 23:47, 8 August 2005 editUser2004 (talk | contribs)23,415 edits →Welcome: having fun?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:20, 4 October 2021 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)Tag: AWB | ||
| (140 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| All other news found in archive. Thanks, and goodnight. | |||
| Please stop vandalising ] or you may be ] from editing. Please read the ] page if you are interested in contributing here. Thanks. ] July 8, 2005 22:36 (UTC) | |||
| ==Wiki-Stalker== | |||
| :PS: adding a derogatory website as his "official website" is a form of vandalism. -] July 9, 2005 00:14 (UTC) | |||
| * My Wiki-Stalker is | |||
| So, Willmcw followed me around. now I keep a very low profile so he wont revert to his ] of me. I leave this page up for him to see, so he knows he hasn't destroyed my ability to work within the rightful structures of ] and be a non fascisitic editor. If You see a post on here by Willmcw, then you know it is written out of spite and is an attempt to debase anything I've written.02:35, 25 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| I have removed all postings here to the archive in the spirit of positivity. let's see how long the truce shall last. Credit goes to ] for working with me] 20:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| :::I have found that they are indeed official websites. I contacted a webmaster and even he agreed that it would be an easy mistake to make. Nonetheless, I was wrong. I apologize to you for accusing you of vandalism by adding them. Cheers, -] 04:29, July 10, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| If you post any personal information about a user you will be instantly blocked indefinitely from editing this site. ]]\] 22:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| ==Disputed article== | |||
| I see you posted this: | |||
| Jonah, you've been reported on ] regarding one or more articles you've created, which are perceived (rightly or wrongly) to have been created for the purposes of harassment. Could I ask you please to consider dropping this issue, regardless of how it started? I'm prepared to discuss this with you by e-mail if you'd like, so please e-mail me using the link on my user page if you'd like to try that. In the meantime, I'd like to delete the recent article that's causing the problem, because I think it's fairly clear the person is non-notable, and the reason for creating it does seem to be related to the dispute between you. Please e-mail me and we can discuss this in detail if you'd like to. Cheers, ] ] 22:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *''-is actually sockpuppet of biff rose] 18:16, 8 August 2005 (UTC)Jonay Ayers'' | |||
| on the user page of ]. Can you explain how you know this? There do appear to be a number of sockpuppets involved in editing this page, as they (yourself included) make identical edits to an obscure article. Deleting NPOV material is a form of vandalism and is not welcome. If you have verifiable information that is negative that can be added, but don't delete positive info just becuase you don't like the subject. -] 23:00, August 8, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for your note. You mention the case with Rangerdude; if you saw that, please don't make the same mistakes, because look what ended up happening. In his case, the whole thing seems to have started as a misunderstanding, and maybe there's a similar misunderstanding here, but once these things escalate, they take on a life of their own, and everyone loses. The subject really isn't notable enough, and if he is, someone else will create it. It looks very bad to suddenly create an article on someone you're involved in an on-going dispute with. Would you mind e-mailing me (or posting here if you prefer) with some details? I'd like to try to stop this escalating any further if I can. ] ] 22:22, 20 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Welcome== | |||
| ::(edit conflict) Thanks, Jonah. I honestly have no knowledge of the Biff Rose page. I've been asked a couple of times to look at it, but I haven't done it (or at least don't recall doing it), and this was a long time ago. Whatever the dispute is, it's time that it stopped, and I'd like to help with that. I was hoping you could tell me what it is you're trying to achieve that you feel is being thwarted, and we could start from there. ] ] 22:36, 20 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Greetings and welcome to wikipedia. Please excuse the rude treatment you've received from the administrator who has engaged most of your attention thus far. He has a bad habit of disregarding ], especially where a newcomer has made edits to an article or subject he deems to be his territory. You should not let a hostile reception deter you from participating here and I hope you will stay. While editing I encourage you to review Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines located . Please make a good faith attempt at abiding by each, and if you believe that another user you have encountered is not doing so a proper recourse is to inform him/her of it. Thanks and welcome once again. ] 23:30, 8 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==3RR== | |||
| :Gee, now I've got my very own wikistalker. Enjoying yourself? -] 23:47, August 8, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, I haven't been following the discussions on ], but I notice you have been making several edits in the last few hours. Please be aware of the 3 Revert Rule. If you revert an article more than three times in a 24 hour period, you can be blocked for 24 hours. Just want to make sure you're aware of the rule. ]|] 05:28, 21 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Personal details== | |||
| Jonah, I would like to try to help sort out the dispute between you and the other editor, but I have to tell you that, if you insert any more personal details about this or any other user into any of the namespaces, including the main namespace, you're likely to be blocked without further warning, perhaps indefinitely. I hope it won't come to that, and that you'll e-mail me and let me know whether I can help to sort things out. ] ] 09:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi again, as you've continued posting personal details, this account has been blocked indefinitely. I'm very willing to unblock if we can come to an agreement that you will stop harassing this user (or doing anything to make him feel he's being harassed). You're welcome to contact me by e-mail if you would like to discuss it. ] ] 01:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::For any admins needing to know the background, see ]. ] ] 01:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==E-mail== | |||
| Jonah, you keep posting with sock puppets to my talk page saying I haven't responded to your e-mail. But I haven't received an e-mail from you. If you genuinely want to discuss the issue, by all means get in touch using the link on my user page. Cheers, ] ] 09:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Non-free use disputed for Image:BbiffRose.jpg== | |||
| {| align="center" style="background-color: white; border:8px solid red; padding:5px; text-align: center; font-size: larger;" | |||
| |] | |||
| |This file may be '''deleted'''. | |||
| |} | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at ] and then go to ] and clarify why you think the image qualifies. | |||
| If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] 02:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:20, 4 October 2021
All other news found in archive. Thanks, and goodnight.
Wiki-Stalker
- My Wiki-Stalker is
So, Willmcw followed me around. now I keep a very low profile so he wont revert to his wiki-stalking of me. I leave this page up for him to see, so he knows he hasn't destroyed my ability to work within the rightful structures of wikipedia and be a non fascisitic editor. If You see a post on here by Willmcw, then you know it is written out of spite and is an attempt to debase anything I've written.02:35, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
I have removed all postings here to the archive in the spirit of positivity. let's see how long the truce shall last. Credit goes to Derex for working with meJonah Ayers 20:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
If you post any personal information about a user you will be instantly blocked indefinitely from editing this site. FearÉIREANN
\ 22:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Disputed article
Jonah, you've been reported on WP:AN/I regarding one or more articles you've created, which are perceived (rightly or wrongly) to have been created for the purposes of harassment. Could I ask you please to consider dropping this issue, regardless of how it started? I'm prepared to discuss this with you by e-mail if you'd like, so please e-mail me using the link on my user page if you'd like to try that. In the meantime, I'd like to delete the recent article that's causing the problem, because I think it's fairly clear the person is non-notable, and the reason for creating it does seem to be related to the dispute between you. Please e-mail me and we can discuss this in detail if you'd like to. Cheers, SlimVirgin 22:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note. You mention the case with Rangerdude; if you saw that, please don't make the same mistakes, because look what ended up happening. In his case, the whole thing seems to have started as a misunderstanding, and maybe there's a similar misunderstanding here, but once these things escalate, they take on a life of their own, and everyone loses. The subject really isn't notable enough, and if he is, someone else will create it. It looks very bad to suddenly create an article on someone you're involved in an on-going dispute with. Would you mind e-mailing me (or posting here if you prefer) with some details? I'd like to try to stop this escalating any further if I can. SlimVirgin 22:22, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Thanks, Jonah. I honestly have no knowledge of the Biff Rose page. I've been asked a couple of times to look at it, but I haven't done it (or at least don't recall doing it), and this was a long time ago. Whatever the dispute is, it's time that it stopped, and I'd like to help with that. I was hoping you could tell me what it is you're trying to achieve that you feel is being thwarted, and we could start from there. SlimVirgin 22:36, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
3RR
Hi, I haven't been following the discussions on Biff Rose, but I notice you have been making several edits in the last few hours. Please be aware of the 3 Revert Rule. If you revert an article more than three times in a 24 hour period, you can be blocked for 24 hours. Just want to make sure you're aware of the rule. User:Zoe| 05:28, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Personal details
Jonah, I would like to try to help sort out the dispute between you and the other editor, but I have to tell you that, if you insert any more personal details about this or any other user into any of the namespaces, including the main namespace, you're likely to be blocked without further warning, perhaps indefinitely. I hope it won't come to that, and that you'll e-mail me and let me know whether I can help to sort things out. SlimVirgin 09:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Hi again, as you've continued posting personal details, this account has been blocked indefinitely. I'm very willing to unblock if we can come to an agreement that you will stop harassing this user (or doing anything to make him feel he's being harassed). You're welcome to contact me by e-mail if you would like to discuss it. SlimVirgin 01:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
- For any admins needing to know the background, see here. SlimVirgin 01:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Jonah, you keep posting with sock puppets to my talk page saying I haven't responded to your e-mail. But I haven't received an e-mail from you. If you genuinely want to discuss the issue, by all means get in touch using the link on my user page. Cheers, SlimVirgin 09:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:BbiffRose.jpg
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:BbiffRose.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
