Misplaced Pages

:Responsible Editing Pledge: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:44, 23 April 2008 editJosette (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers3,665 editsm →Ah but, might this mean a Wikipedian gets harassed by the subject of the bio?: sp← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:14, 25 February 2023 edit undoHeavy Water (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers4,637 edits Change per MOS:S/HE.Tag: 2017 wikitext editor 
(30 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{essay|WP:REEP}} {{essay|WP:REEP}}
{{nutshell|Publishing information about any living individual, particularly if that information is critical or negative, whilst hiding behind a the anonymity of the screenname is unethical. We will not do it.}} {{nutshell|Publishing information about any living individual, particularly if that information is critical or negative, whilst hiding behind the anonymity of a screenname is unethical. Those who sign will not do it.}}


Misplaced Pages normally allows users to edit any article without logging in or to edit through a using pseudonym (an account that does not identify the real name of the user). This policy is useful. It allows people to edit without fear of harassment, or any unjustifiable interference to their "real" life (although it does not guarantee anonymity). Misplaced Pages normally allows users to edit any article without logging in or to edit by using a pseudonym (an account that does not identify the real name of the user). This policy is useful. It allows people to edit without fear of harassment, or any unjustifiable interference to their "real" life (although it does not guarantee anonymity).


However, with regard to the ], there seems an unfairness about users being able to comment on another person, whilst withholding their own identity. Other publications may provide information or commentary on living individuals, but the authors or editors responsible for such material are publicly named. Such writers stake their real life reputations on the accuracy and fairness of what they write, and indeed may legally held to account. However, with regard to the ], there seems an unfairness about users being able to comment on another person, whilst withholding their own identity. Other publications may provide information or commentary on living individuals, but the authors or editors responsible for such material are publicly named. Such writers stake their real life reputations on the accuracy and fairness of what they write, and indeed may legally be held to account.


Whilst, Wikipedians being sued is not something desirable, Wikipedians knowing that their personal reputation is at stake and that they are legal accountable, will encourage responsible editing. It is fair to the subject. It gives reassurance to the reader. Whilst Wikipedians being sued is not something desirable, Wikipedians knowing that their personal reputation is at stake and that they are legally accountable, will encourage responsible editing. It is fair to the subject. It gives reassurance to the reader.




===Ah but, might this mean a Wikipedian gets harassed by the subject of the bio?=== ===Ah but, might this mean a Wikipedian gets harassed by the subject of the bio?===
Well, it indeed might. But consider: Well, it indeed might. But consider:
*Which happens more, a Wikipedian gets harassed by a biographical subject, or a biographical subject gets libelled or attacked by an anonymous wikipedian? (Sometimes we seem more concerned with our rights, privacy and reputation than with those of real people.) *Which happens more, a Wikipedian gets harassed by a biographical subject, or a biographical subject gets libelled or attacked by an anonymous Wikipedian? (Sometimes we seem more concerned with our rights, privacy and reputation than with those of real people.)
*A Wikipedian can walk away, the biographical subject cannot. *A Wikipedian can walk away, the biographical subject cannot.
*A Wikipedian who wants to avoid real life consequences for his edits does not need to edit biographies of living people (or indeed at all) *A Wikipedian who wants to avoid real life consequences for their edits does not need to edit biographies of living people (or indeed at all)
*Writing about a living person anonymously is blatantly cowardly. *Writing negatively about a living person anonymously may be viewed as cowardly.


==The Pledge== ==The Pledge==
Line 24: Line 24:
*already using accounts identifying their real identity (and will not use sock puppets on BLPs) *already using accounts identifying their real identity (and will not use sock puppets on BLPs)
*OR pledging not to add content concerning living people *OR pledging not to add content concerning living people
*OR intending creating separate accounts, linked to their real identities, for this purpose *OR intending to create separate accounts, linked to their real identities, for this purpose


===Signatories=== ===Signatories===
Line 30: Line 30:
#] (]) 18:46, 23 April 2008 (UTC) #] (]) 18:46, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
#''']''' <sup>]</sup> #''']''' <sup>]</sup>
#]] ] 19:30, 23 April 2008 (UTC) #My is fairly well known. ]] ] 19:30, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
#-- <span style="background:#ffff00;border:2px solid #00bfff;">]</span> 19:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
# ++]: ]/] 20:20, 23 April 2008 (UTC) # ++]: ]/] 20:20, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
# after reflection is my pledge. Thanks, ] 23:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC) # after reflection is my pledge. Thanks, ] 23:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
# ] (]) 04:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
# ] (]) 08:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
# already using my real identity for all edits on all articles, and will not use socks on any article --] (]) 13:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
#I would prefer all editors to say who they are, but would not like to see that made a rule. <span style="border: 1px #F10; background-color:cream;">''']''' *]</span> 21:44, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
# I only use this account, and pledge to continue to do so. Although, I would not support or endorse this as anything more than a voluntary pledge. Note that my support applies only to the pledge as of this time, and any further edits to the text may or may not have my support. - ] 03:24, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
# ] (]:]) 22:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
#I don't wish to reveal my identity, so I will not put statements about living people in an encyclopedia. This is a necessary tradeoff. -] (]) 22:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
# &mdash; ]\<sup>]</sup> 00:02, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
# ] (]) 10:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
# My identity can be found in my contributions. ] ] 10:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
# <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 15:15, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
# <span style="font-variant:small-caps">] <sup>'''(])'''</sup></span> 12:03, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
# —<span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;">'''] <sup>(] • ])</sup>''' • '''5:21pm''' •</span> 07:21, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:14, 25 February 2023

Essay on editing Misplaced Pages
This is an essay.
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Misplaced Pages contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Misplaced Pages's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.		Shortcut
This page in a nutshell: Publishing information about any living individual, particularly if that information is critical or negative, whilst hiding behind the anonymity of a screenname is unethical. Those who sign will not do it.

Misplaced Pages normally allows users to edit any article without logging in or to edit by using a pseudonym (an account that does not identify the real name of the user). This policy is useful. It allows people to edit without fear of harassment, or any unjustifiable interference to their "real" life (although it does not guarantee anonymity).

However, with regard to the biographies of living people, there seems an unfairness about users being able to comment on another person, whilst withholding their own identity. Other publications may provide information or commentary on living individuals, but the authors or editors responsible for such material are publicly named. Such writers stake their real life reputations on the accuracy and fairness of what they write, and indeed may legally be held to account.

Whilst Wikipedians being sued is not something desirable, Wikipedians knowing that their personal reputation is at stake and that they are legally accountable, will encourage responsible editing. It is fair to the subject. It gives reassurance to the reader.


Ah but, might this mean a Wikipedian gets harassed by the subject of the bio?

Well, it indeed might. But consider:

  • Which happens more, a Wikipedian gets harassed by a biographical subject, or a biographical subject gets libelled or attacked by an anonymous Wikipedian? (Sometimes we seem more concerned with our rights, privacy and reputation than with those of real people.)
  • A Wikipedian can walk away, the biographical subject cannot.
  • A Wikipedian who wants to avoid real life consequences for their edits does not need to edit biographies of living people (or indeed at all)
  • Writing negatively about a living person anonymously may be viewed as cowardly.

The Pledge

Without necessarily calling for any change in Misplaced Pages policy we, the undersigned, pledge NOT to engage in the anonymous or pseudonymous publication of material on any living individual.

With regard to biographies of living people, we will not contribute content (that is other than copyediting, or removing inappropriate content) unless through accounts linked to our real identity.

That is, the undersigned are either:

  • already using accounts identifying their real identity (and will not use sock puppets on BLPs)
  • OR pledging not to add content concerning living people
  • OR intending to create separate accounts, linked to their real identities, for this purpose

Signatories

  1. --Doc 13:58, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 18:46, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
  3. MBisanz
  4. My real name is fairly well known. ⇒SWATJester 19:30, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
  5. ++Lar: t/c 20:20, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
  6. after reflection this is my pledge. Thanks, SqueakBox 23:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
  7. Bstone (talk) 04:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  8. FCYTravis (talk) 08:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  9. already using my real identity for all edits on all articles, and will not use socks on any article --Enric Naval (talk) 13:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  10. I would prefer all editors to say who they are, but would not like to see that made a rule. SilkTork * 21:44, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
  11. I only use this account, and pledge to continue to do so. Although, I would not support or endorse this as anything more than a voluntary pledge. Note that my support applies only to the pledge as of this time, and any further edits to the text may or may not have my support. - Philippe 03:24, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
  12. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 22:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
  13. I don't wish to reveal my identity, so I will not put statements about living people in an encyclopedia. This is a necessary tradeoff. -67.121.114.251 (talk) 22:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
  14. — Catherine\ 00:02, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
  15. MessedRocker (talk) 10:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
  16. My identity can be found in my contributions. Celarnor 10:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
  17. Guy (Help!) 15:15, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
  18. John Vandenberg 12:03, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
  19. —James • 5:21pm • 07:21, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Category: