Misplaced Pages

Divine Light Mission: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:33, 27 April 2008 editMomento (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,864 edits Millennium '73: context← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:41, 14 June 2024 edit undoBookeWorme (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users906 edits See alsoTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 
(580 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Hindu organization}}
The '''Divine Light Mission''' (DLM) was a spiritual organization founded by ] in 1960 to further his work in northern India. When Shri Maharaji died in 1966, he was succeeded as ] by his eight year old fourth son, ] (also known as Sant Ji and Balyogeshwar at the time, and later as Guru Maharaj Ji, then Maharaji).
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2022}}
The '''Divine Light Mission''' (''Divya Sandesh Parishad''; '''DLM''') was an organization founded in 1960 by ] ] for his following in northern India. During the 1970s, the DLM gained prominence in the ] under the leadership of his fourth and youngest son (]). Some scholars noted the influence of the ] and the ] tradition, a.k.a. ] movement, but the western movement was widely seen as a ], a ], a charismatic ] or an alternative religion. DLM officials said the movement represented a church rather than a religion.<ref>"Miami's startled elite wish the guru, in short, a pleasant stay", By Barry Bearak, Knight-Ridder Service, 30 July 1977. INDEPENDENT PRESS TELEGRAM (Long Beach, CA) A-11 "ACCORDING to Anctil and mission president Bill Patterson, they represent a church rather than a religion."</ref>


When Shri Hans Ji Maharaj died in 1966, he was succeeded as guru by Prem Rawat, then just eight years old, despite rival claims from other family members. Although Prem Rawat was accepted as his father's successor, because of his age his family retained effective control of the DLM. In 1971, Rawat defied his mother by travelling to the UK and the US, where local branches of DLM were established and rapidly expanded. By 1973, DLM had over a million followers in India and tens of thousands of followers in the West, along with dozens of ]s and hundreds of centers.<ref>Downton (1979), p. 5</ref>
Although Prem Rawat was accepted as his father's successor in 1966, effective control of DLM was shared by the whole family.<ref>Melton, Gordon J. Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America, (1986), pp.141-2 Garland Publishing, ISBN 0-8240-9036-5 "Just six years after the founding of the Mission, Shri Hans Ji Maharaj was succeeded by his younger son Prem Pal Singh Rawat, who was eight when he was recognized as the new Perfect Master and assumed the title Maharaj Ji. Maharaj Ji had been recognized as spiritually adept, even within the circle of the Holy Family, as Shri Hans' family was called. He had been initiated at the age of six He assumed the role of Perfect Master at his father's funeral by telling the disciples who had gathered. Though officially the autocratic leader of the Mission, because of Maharaji's age authority was shared by the whole family."</ref><ref>Aagaard, Johannes. ''Who Is Who In Guruism?'' (1980) "During the first 6 years of the new movement its head was Shri Hans, the father of the young Maharaj Ji, who, at the age of 8 years, succeeded his father in 1966."</ref><ref>U. S. Department of the Army, ''Religious Requirements and Practices of Certain Selected Groups: A Handbook for Chaplains'' (2001) pp.1-5 , The Minerva Group, ISBN 0-89875-607-3<br /> Following his death, Shri Hans Ji appointed the youngest of his four sons, Sant Ji as the next Perfect Master and therefore he assumed the head of the Divine Light Mission as decreed by his father."</ref> In 1971 Rawat travelled to the U.K. and the U.S. where local branches of DLM were established and rapidly expanded. As Rawat matured he began to take a more active role in Western DLM, taking administrative control of the U.S. branch when he turned sixteen. His increasing independence and his marriage to a non-Indian caused a permanent rift with his mother and two of his brothers. They returned to India and his eldest brother Satpal gained control of the DLM in India, while Rawat remained the leader in the rest of the world. Divine United Organization (DUO) was set up in India in 1977 to disseminate Rawat's teachings. The Western DLM in the U.S., U.K., France, and Australia changed its name to ] beginning in 1983.

As Rawat grew older, he began to take a more active role in the movement and, when he turned sixteen, following the financially disastrous ] festival, he took administrative control of the US branch. His increasing independence and his marriage to a non-Indian in 1974, caused a permanent rift with his mother and two of his brothers, Satpal Ji Maharaj and Bhole Ji Maharaj. They returned to India, where his eldest brother ] took over the control of the Indian DLM.

In the early 1980s, Rawat began disbanding the western DLM. He closed the ashrams and eliminated the remaining Indian influences from his presentation to make it independent of any specific culture or religion. In the US, UK, France and Australia, ] was formed to replace the DLM in supporting Rawat in his role as teacher.


==History== ==History==

===Founding and early years in India=== ===Founding and early years in India===
{{details|Hans_Ji_Maharaj#Succession}} {{Further|Hans Ji Maharaj#Succession}}
], initiated by the Sant Mat guru Sri ], began teaching in the Sind and Lahore provinces of India in the 1930s. In 1950 he began initiating ''Mahatmas'', followers who could themselves initiate devotees, and formed a magazine called "Hansadesh."<ref>J. Gordon Melton, "Encylcopedic Handbook of Cults in America, Revised and Updated Edition", Garland Publishing: New York, 1992, p. 217-218</ref> ], initiated by the ] guru Sri ], began teaching in the ] and ] provinces of India in the 1930s. In 1950 he began initiating '']'', followers who could themselves initiate devotees, and formed a magazine called "Hansadesh" which is still active in 2017.<ref>Melton (1992), pp. 217-218</ref>


In 1960 in the city of Patna, he founded the Divine Light Mission (''Divya Sandesh Parishad'') to organize followers across Northern India. At the time of the guru's death on July 19, 1966, the Divine Light Mission had six million members in India.<ref> "Whatever Happened to Guru Maharaj Ji? ", Hinduism Today Magazine, October 1983 (Retrieved March 2008)</ref> In 1960 in the city of ], he founded the Divine Light Mission (''Divya Sandesh Parishad'') to organize followers across Northern India. At the time of his death on 19 July 1966, the Divine Light Mission had six million members in India.<ref>"Whatever Happened to Guru Maharaj Ji? ", Hinduism Today Magazine, October 1983 (Retrieved March 2008)</ref>


During the customary 13 days of mourning, his mother and senior officials of the organization discussed the succession. Prem Rawat, who was 8 years-old at the time, addressed the crowd and was accepted by them as their teacher and "]" and was named as Bal Bhagwan.<ref>Aagaard (1980)</ref><ref>U. S. Department of the Army (2001), pp.1-5</ref><ref>Fahlbusch et al. (1998), p. 861</ref> Because of his age, effective control of the DLM was shared by the whole family.<ref name="Melton 1986, pp.141-2">Melton (1986), pp.141-2</ref>
Prem Rawat was accepted as his father's successor, though effective control of DLM was shared by the whole family as Rawat was only 8 years old at the time.<ref>Melton, Gordon J. Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America, (1986), pp.141-2 Garland Publishing, ISBN 0-8240-9036-5 "Just six years after the founding of the Mission, Shri Hans Ji Maharaj was succeeded by his younger son Prem Pal Singh Rawat, who was eight when he was recognized as the new Perfect Master and assumed the title Maharaj Ji. Maharaj Ji had been recognized as spiritually adept, even within the circle of the Holy Family, as Shri Hans' family was called. He had been initiated at the age of six He assumed the role of Perfect Master at his father's funeral by telling the disciples who had gathered. Though officially the autocratic leader of the Mission, because of Maharaji's age authority was shared by the whole family."</ref><ref> Lee, Raymond L M. ''Sacred Tensions: Modernity and Religious Transformation in Malaysia'' (1997) pp.109-110 The University of South Carolina Press. ISBN 1-57003-167-3 "Upon the death of the founder in 1966, one of his sons, Guru Maharaj Ji, assumed leadership of the movement and won the hearts of many young Westerners." (p.109)</ref><ref>Aagaard, Johannes. ''Who Is Who In Guruism?'' (1980) "During the first 6 years of the new movement its head was Shri Hans, the father of the young Maharaj Ji, who, at the age of 8 years, succeeded his father in 1966."</ref><ref>U. S. Department of the Army, ''Religious Requirements and Practices of Certain Selected Groups: A Handbook for Chaplains'' (2001) pp.1-5 , The Minerva Group, ISBN 0-89875-607-3<br /> Following his death, Shri Hans Ji appointed the youngest of his four sons, Sant Ji as the next Perfect Master and therefore he assumed the head of the Divine Light Mission as decreed by his father."</ref> In the early 1970s, his family told American reporters that Shri Hans was travelling at the time of his death, but had written a letter home essentially naming Prem as his successor. Shri Hans' personal driver, who was a witness, confirms that Shri Hans publicly requested that Rawat would continue his work, but that some disregarded this request. During the customary 12 days of mourning, discussions were held about the succession. This culminated in Prem Rawat addressing the crowd and being accepted by them as their teacher and "]".<ref>
Singh, Bihari. ''Maharaji Accepted by His Father's Students'', .<br>"Right after Shri Maharaj Ji’s death, the family and several mahatmas were discussing who would become Master after the 13 days of mourning were over. They were thinking about Bal Bhagwan Ji, who was the eldest son. When they asked me what I thought, I said, 'Shri Maharaj Ji told us when Maharaji was born, "He’s going to take my message all over the world."' Some were suggesting that there be several gurus (all four brothers or some group of 5 or 7 gurus), and others were still in the Bal Bhagwan Ji camp. Particularly in India, when a father dies, the older son steps into his place. Twelve days after Shri Maharaj Ji’s death, Maharaji went on stage with a handkerchief on his head and spoke for about 45 minutes to the people who had gathered. After listening to him, everybody accepted him as their Master."
</ref><ref>Fahlbusch E., Lochman J. M., Mbiti J., Pelikan J., Vischer L, Barret D. (Eds.) ''The Encyclopedia of Christianity'' (1998). p.861, ISBN 90-04-11316-9<br .>"At the funeral of Shree Hans, his son Prem Pal Singh Rawat comforted those who mourned his father's death with the thought that they still had perfect knowledge with them. The son himself had become the subject of this knowledge, the perfect master, in the place of his father, and took the title of "guru" and the name of Maharaj Ji, or great king, a title of respect to which other titular names were added. The honors paid him by his followers gave him the characteristic of a messianic child. These were supposedly his by nature and they helped him to eliminate rival claims from his own family."</ref><ref>Melton, Gordon J. Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America, (1986), p 218 Garland Publishing, ISBN 0-8240-9036-5</ref>


===International expansion=== ===International Footprints===


In 1971, Rawat, then known as Guru Maharaji Ji, travelled to the West against his mother's wishes.<ref>Lewis, James R. ''The encyclopedia of cults, sects, and new religions''. Amherst, N.Y. : Prometheus Books, 1998. ISBN 1573922226 p 301</ref> DLMs were established in the U.S. and the U.K. The U.S. branch was headquartered in ]. It was registered there as a non-profit corporation and in 1974 was recognized as a church by the United States ] under section 501(c)(3).<ref>Stephen J. Hunt Alternative Religions: A Sociological Introduction (2003), pp.116-7, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. ISBN 0-7546-3410-8 In 1971, Rawat, then known as Guru Maharaji Ji, travelled to the West against his mother's wish & will.<ref name=autogenerated9>Lewis (1998), p. 301</ref> DLM was established in the U.S. and the UK. The U.S. branch was headquartered in ]. It was registered there as a non-profit corporation and in 1974 was recognized as a church by the United States ] under section 501(c)(3).<ref name="Hunt 2003, pp.116-7">Hunt (2003), pp.116-7</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.guidestar.org/pqShowGsReport.do?partner=amex&ein=23-7174539#rptlink1 |title=American Express Search – ELAN VITAL INC |publisher=GuideStar |access-date=2014-07-17}}</ref>
The leader of the Divine Light Mission, the Guru Maharaji, was 13 years old when he spectacularly rose to fame in the early 1970's. His global tour in 1971 helped to establish a large following in Britain and the USA.</ref><ref>http://www.guidestar.org/pqShowGsReport.do?partner=amex&ein=23-7174539#rptlink1</ref>


By 1972 DLM was operating in North and South America, Europe and Australia. Tens of thousands of people had been initiated (become ]s) and several hundred centers and dozens of ashrams formed.<ref>J. Gordon Melton, ''Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America.'' New York/London: Garland, 1986; revised edition, pp. 141-145<br /> "Many were initiated and became the core of the Mission in the United States. Headquarters were established in Denver, and by the end of 1973, tens of thousands had been initiated, and several hundred centers as well as over twenty ashrams, which housed approximately 500 of the most dedicated premies, had emerged."</small></ref> By 1973 the DLM said it had 8,000 devotees and forty ashrams in the U.K.<ref>Price, Maeve (1979): "The Divine Light Mission as a social organization". ''Sociological Review'', 27, Page 279-296. "It was an opportune moment for DLM to appear on the scene and, by the summer of 1973, the mission claimed to have a following of 8,000 devotees, or premies, in Britain. From the small beginning of one mahatma in London and a handful of premies, the mission grew, with up to half a dozen mahatmas at any one time giving knowledge, the establishment of Divine Information Centres in most major towns and cities and the setting up of about forty ashrams (designated premie households) throughout Britain by the end of 1973."</ref> By 1972 DLM was operating in North and South America, Europe and Australia. By 1973, DLM was operating in 37 countries, tens of thousands of people had been initiated (become premies) and several hundred centers and dozens of ashrams formed in the U.S. and the UK. DLM said it had 8,000 devotees and forty ashrams at that time.<ref name=autogenerated1>Oz in the Astrodome; Middle-class premies find Guru. The guru enthroned by Ted Morgan, New York Times, 9 December 1973, Page 338</ref><ref name="autogenerated5"/><ref name="Price 1979">Price (1979)</ref>


In the United States, the staff of the headquarters grew to 125. Social service facilities, including a medical clinic in New York City, were opened. A Women's Spiritual Right Organization dedicated to reaching out to persons in prisons, mental institutions, and hospitals, was organized.<ref>Melton J. Gordon Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America. New York/London: Garland, 1986 (revised edition), ISBN 0-8240-9036-5, pp. 141-145</ref><ref>Messer, Jeanne. 1976 "Guru Maharaj Ji and the Divine Light Mission," in Charles Y. Glock and Robert N. Bellah, eds. The New Religious Consciousness. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 52-72. ISBN 0-52003-472-4</ref> The U.S. DLM published two periodicals, ''And it is Divine'' and ''Divine Times''.<ref>Lewis, James R. ''Cults in America''. ABC-CLIO, Inc. Santa Barbara, 1998. p 83</ref> The World Peace Corps (WPC) was established to provide protection for Rawat, but became the organizing agent of meetings and businesses.<ref>Price, Maeve (1979): "The Divine Light Mission as a social organization". ''Sociological Review'', 27, pp. 279-296. "A special branch of the mission, known as the World Peace Corps (WPC) was established, initially to provide protection for Maharaj Ji. However it soon became the main agent for organizing meetings or 'programmes' and securing financial support and it ventured into all kinds of supposedly money-making enterprises such as transport, building and the distribution of vegetarian food and certain Indian products such as incense. "</ref> A variety of businesses were founded under DLM auspices including laundromats, used clothing stores, and the "Cleanliness-is-Next-to Godliness" janitorial service.<ref>"Guru's 17th birthday observed", KENNETH T. WALSH Associated Press, ''GREELEY (Colo.) TRIBUNE'' December 11, 1974 p.16</ref> In the United States, the staff at the headquarters grew to 125, and ]es connected the headquarters with the ashrams.<ref name=autogenerated6>"Indian Shrewdness Plus American Merchandising Equals Guru", BETTY FLYNN ''Chicago Daily News''</ref> Social service facilities, including a medical clinic in New York City, were opened. A Women's Spiritual Right Organization dedicated to reaching out to persons in prisons, mental institutions and hospitals, was organized.<ref name=autogenerated5>Melton (1986), pp. 141-145</ref><ref>Messer in Glock & Bellah (1976), pp. 52-72</ref> The U.S. DLM published two periodicals: ''And It Is Divine'' (''AIID''), a monthly magazine with a circulation of 90,000; and ''Divine Times'', a biweekly newspaper with a circulation of 60,000.<ref>"Snowballing Movement Centers On Teen-Age Guru From India", AP, ''THE LAWTON CONSTITUTION-MORNING PRESS'', Sunday, 29 July 1973</ref> The cover price of ''AIID'' was $1 but most were given away free, as were the advertisements.<ref>Messer in Glock & Bellah (1976), p. 66</ref> The World Peace Corps (WPC) was established as a security force to provide protection for Rawat. After Bob Mishler, the DLM President, was removed from power he said that Rawat got the idea to start a bodyguard unit after watching ''The Godfather''.<ref>{{Cite news|last=UPI|author-link=United Press International|title=Maharaj Ji has Jones-like traits|periodical=Chronicle-Telegram|location=Elyria|page=A–3|date=25 November 1978}}</ref> The WPC became the organizing agent of meetings and businesses.<ref name="Price 1979"/> A variety of businesses were founded under US DLM auspices including laundromats, used clothing stores, a plane charter agency ("Divine Travel Services"), a repair service, and the "Cleanliness-is-Next-to-Godliness" janitorial service.<ref name=autogenerated6 /><ref>"Guru's 17th birthday observed", KENNETH T. WALSH Associated Press, ''GREELEY (Colo.) TRIBUNE'' 11 December 1974 p.16</ref>


===Detroit incident===
On ] ], a reporter from an underground paper slapped Rawat in the face with a shaving cream pie.<ref>"15-Year Old Guru Slapped in Face by Shaving Cream Pie", UPI, ''Los Angeles Times'', Aug 8, 1973; pg. 2</ref> Rawat responded by saying that he did not want the attacker arrested or hurt, but the reporter was seriously injured a few days later by two members of the DLM.<ref>J. Gordon Melton Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America (New York/London: Garland, 1986; revised edition, Garland, p 380</ref> When local members heard of the incident they notified Rawat in Los Angeles who immediately requested that DLM conduct a full investigation. The suspected assailants, one of them a mahatma, were located and held for the police but the police chose not to arrest them.<ref>Page 2 - Section B – Sun News – Las Cruces, New Mexico - Wednesday, August 22, 1973</ref><ref>Guru Goons Loose Fifth Estate Magazine Article - December 1973 - Volume 8 No. 18 the Guru immediately requested that the Divine Light Mission conduct a full investigation ... As a result of this investigation the assailants were located, confessed their part in the incident, and offered to turn themselves in. The local authorities were immediately notified but apparently made no effort to arrest.</ref><ref>"Get Your Red-Hot Panaceas!", Ken Kelley, ''New York Times'', January 19, 1974</ref>
<div id="Pat Halley beating" ></div>On 8 August 1973, while Rawat was at the Detroit City Hall to receive a testimonial resolution praising his work, Pat Halley, who was at the time a reporter from Detroit's underground periodical '']'', slapped him in the face with a shaving cream pie.<ref>"Guru Gets Testimonial And Some Pie in Face", "New York Times", 8 August 1973 Page 43</ref><ref>"15-Year Old Guru Slapped in Face by Shaving Cream Pie", UPI, ''Los Angeles Times'', 8 August 1973; pg. 2</ref> Rawat responded by saying that he did not want his attacker arrested or hurt, but the reporter was attacked by two men a few days later and seriously injured.<ref>A-6 Independent (AM) Press-Telegram (PM) Long Beach, Calif., Wed., 8 August 1973</ref><ref>Melton (1992), p. 222</ref> When local members heard of the incident they notified Rawat in Los Angeles who extended his regrets and condolences to Pat Halley's family, and requested that the DLM conduct a full investigation. The assailants, one of them an Indian, were identified. They admitted their part in the incident and offered to turn themselves in. The Chicago police were immediately notified.<ref>Page 2 – Section B – Sun News – Las Cruces, New Mexico – Wednesday, 22 August 1973</ref> The Detroit police declined to initiate extradition proceedings, variously claiming that they were unable to locate the assailants, or that the cost of extraditing them from Chicago to Detroit made it impractical. The arrest warrant remained outstanding.<ref>I See The Light, by Ken Kelley, Penthouse (July 1974), page 98-100, 137-138, 146, 148, & 150-151.</ref> This lack of action by the Detroit police was attributed by some to Halley's radical politics. A spokesman later stated that the Indian national had been "shipped off to Europe".<ref>"Get Your Red-Hot Panaceas!", Ken Kelley, ''New York Times'', 19 January 1974</ref>


===Millennium '73=== ===Festivals===
]s were a regular part of the Divine Light Mission's activities and a source of revenue. Members would pay from $50 to $100 to attend, and ] events would generate considerable donations.<ref>"Financing the New Religions: Comparative and Theoretical Considerations" JAMES T. RICHARDSON p.259</ref> The DLM celebrated three main festivals: Holi, which is celebrated in late March or early April; Guru Puja, which was held in July; and Hans Jayanti, which falls in November.<ref>435 A.2d 1368. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Mark A. ''DOTTER v. MAINE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION''. Argued 2 March 1981. Decided 19 October 1981. ]</ref> Hans Jayanti marks the birthday of the DLM's founder.<ref>Galanter (1999), p. 20</ref> According to ], the members at a festival in Orlando, Florida "looked as though they had been drawn from the graduate campus of a large university—bright, not too carefully groomed, casually dressed. They were lively, good-tempered, and committed to their mutual effort. There was no idleness, brashness, marijuana, beer, loud music, or flirtation—all hallmarks of a more typical assembly of people in their twenties".<ref>Galanter (1999), pp. 22-28</ref> Other festivals were held nationally and locally, and sometimes organized with little advance notice. Attending as many as ten festivals a year meant many members were unable to hold regular full-time jobs, and required sacrificing leisure and community activities in order to devote time to earning the money needed to attend.<ref>DuPertuis (1986), p. 118</ref>


In 1972, seven ]s were chartered to bring members from the U.S. and other countries to the Hans Jayanti festival held at the main ashram near ]. 2500 foreign members camped out at the mission's "city of love" for a month.<ref name=autogenerated3>"Some feel the youth is fraud" Long Beach, Calif., Sun., 19 December 1972 ''INDEPENDENT, PRESS-TELEGRAM'' A-27</ref> The event attracted a reported total of 500,000 attendees.<ref>"Guru's Pupil Slates Talk", ''SYRACUSE POST-STANDARD'' 3 February 1973. p. 3</ref> When Rawat flew to India to attend, he was accused of attempting to smuggle $65,000 worth of cash and jewelry into the country, but no charges were ever filed.<ref name="CBY1974">Moritz, (1974)</ref> and the Indian government later issued an apology.<ref>Downton (1979), pp. 187-8</ref><ref>"The Mini-Guru: Discourse on Maharaj Ji is scheduled in Wiesbaden" J. KING CRUGER, 3 February 1973 ''THE STARS AND STRIPES'' Page 9</ref> The accusation led to negative coverage in the Indian press and hard feelings between Rawat and his mother, who had persuaded him to return to India for the festival.<ref name=autogenerated3 />
In 1973 Rawat put his eldest brother Satpal in charge of organizing "Millennium '73", a three-day event celebrating the birthday of Rawat’s father at the ], the youth culture event of the year.<ref>"Under the Astrodome: Maharaj Ji – The Selling of a Guru", Gregg Kilday, Los Angeles Times, Nov 13, 1973 <small>So when the DLM's annual Hans Jayanti festival drew near, although it has been traditionally held in India, the decision was made to move the show to America.</small></ref><ref>Worshipping the Absurd 'The Negation of Social Causality among the Followers of Guru Maharaj Ji.' Article by Daniel Foss and Larkin in Sociological Analysis, 1978.</ref><ref>Sophia Collier.Soul Rush'The Odyssey of a Young Woman of the '70s', New York : Morrow, 1978. From the first he had taken a great interest in the festival, and sometime in the early summer Maharaj Ji had put him "in charge" of the festival effort. Despite the title though, it was commonly understood that Rennie Davis, going under the more humble billing of "General Coordinator," was the person to listen to on any nuts and bolts issues involving the event.</ref> Billed as "the most significant event in human history" it was said to herald "a thousand years of peace for people who want peace", the idea being that peace could come to the world as individuals experiencing inner peace.<ref name = "nytmillennium" /> The event featured spectacular staging, a 56-piece rock band and a giant video screen that showed a barrage of shots from the tumultuous 1960s. An architect gave details of a planned "Divine City" with translucent hexagonal plastic houses connected with monorails, polluting vehicles would be banned and solar power would be used.<ref>"Kent, Stephen A. ''From Slogans to Mantras'' Syracuse University Press, 2001. p 156</ref><ref>J. Gordon Melton Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America (New York/London: Garland, 1986; revised edition, Garland, pages 141-145</ref><ref name="nytoz">"Oz in the Astrodome", by Ted Morgan, New York Times, December 9, 1973</ref><ref name = "nytmillennium">“Guru's Followers Cheer 'Millennium' in Festivities in Astrodome", by Eleanor Blau, New York Times, November 12, 1973</ref><ref>"Maharaji Ji: The Selling of a Guru, 1973", by Gregg Killday, Los Angeles Times, November 13, 1973, p. D1</ref> Some predicted that 100,000 people would attend, and even provided a space in the parking lot for a flying saucer to land.<ref>"Kent, Stephen A. ''From Slogans to Mantras'' Syracuse University Press, 2001. p 156</ref> When Satpal heard about the flying saucer he said, "If you see any, just give them some of our literature".<ref>Oz in the Astrodome; Middle-class premies find Guru The guru enthroned by Ted Morgan, New York Times, December 9, 1973, Page 338</ref> ], the General Coordinator of the event, predicted 22,000. The actual attendance was estimated at 25,000 by followers and 10,000 by police.<ref name = "nytmillennium" /><ref>"Worshiping the Absurd: The Negation Of Social Causality Among The Followers of Guru Maharaj Ji", Daniel A. Foss, Ralph W. Larkin, Sociological Analysis, 1978, 39, 2:157-164</ref> <ref>Sophia Collier. Soul Rush – The Odyssey of a Young Woman of the '70s, New York: Morrow, 1978. "From my tours to promote the festival and my previous experience organizing this sort of event, I know 22,000 is all we can count on. It's a reasonable figure," I had heard Rennie remark a few days before. "If others come," Rennie continued almost whimsically, "it will be the grace of God, so then the grace of God can house them, too."</ref>


In June 1973, the British DLM, with Prem Rawat's mother acting on behalf of her son, organized the "Festival of Love" at ] in London. While it drew thousands of attendees, Rawat began receiving hostile press coverage, partly due to his showing up late, or not at all, at scheduled appearances. The membership had grown very rapidly but the organizers had no clear idea where to lead the following, nor did they have the financial resources to maintain so many full-time workers.<ref name="Price 1979"/>
Davis, well known as one of the defendants in the ] trial, attracted extensive media coverage as a spokesperson for Rawat.<ref name="tvmeditating">"TV: Meditating on a Young Guru and His Followers", by John O'Connor, New York Times, February 25, 1974</ref><ref name="nytoz" /><ref>"Houston's Version of Peace in Our Time" GREGG KILDAY, Los Angeles Times Nov 25, 1973 p. S18</ref><ref>Sophia Collier.Soul Rush'The Odyssey of a Young Woman of the '70s', New York : Morrow, 1978.it was commonly understood that Rennie Davis, going under the more humble billing of "General Coordinator," was the person to listen to on any nuts and bolts issues involving the event.</ref> At the event he declared that "All I can say is, honestly, very soon now, every single human being will know the one who was waited for by every religion of all times has actually come."<ref>"Kent, Stephen A. ''From Slogans to Mantras'' Syracuse University Press, 2001. p 52</ref>In an interview at Millennium Rawat denied being the Messiah and when asked by reporters about the claims made by his followers Rawat said "why don't you do me a favor.. . why don't you go to the devotees and ask their explanation about it?"<ref>RollingStone Magazine Issue N°156 - March 14, 1974 (Page 36-50)</ref>


====Millennium '73====
The Mission incurred a debt which has been estimated as between $600,000 and over $1 million, severely damaging its finances, though it had been able to reduce the debt to $80,000 by late 1976.<ref>"Growing Pile of Unpaid Bills Beneath Guru's Spiritual Bliss", Deborah Frazier, UPI, March 23, 1975, Lincoln, Neb., Sunday Journal and Star</ref><ref>"New Religious Movements Turn to Worldly Success", KIRPAL SINGH KHALSA, JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION, Vol. 25, No. 2 (Jun., 1986), pp. 233–247</ref><ref>Carroll Stoner & Jo Anne Parke All God's Children, Chilton Book Co ISBN 0801966205</ref> The event was depicted in the award-winning U.S. documentary ] broadcast by ] in 1974.<ref>"Videotape Explorers on the Trail of a Guru", by Dick Adler, Los Angeles Times, February 23, 1974 p. B2 </ref><ref name="tvmeditating" />
{{main|Millennium '73}}
The 1973 Hans Jayanti festival was held at the ] in ], and publicized as "Millennium '73".<ref>"Under the Astrodome: Maharaj Ji – The Selling of a Guru", Gregg Kilday, Los Angeles Times, 13 November 1973</ref> The free three-day event was billed as "the most significant event in human history" that would herald "a thousand years of peace for people who want peace", the idea being that peace would come to the world as individuals experienced inner peace.<ref name = "nytmillennium" /> To promote the event, Prem Rawat's 20-year-old brother, Bhole Ji Rawat toured with a 60-piece band, ] for two weeks giving free concerts.<ref>"'Round and About" ''The Vidville Messenger''. Valparaiso, Indiana, 25 October 1973</ref> The 500-member tour was dubbed "Soul Rush" and traveled to seven cities on the way to Houston.<ref>Collier (1978), p. 170</ref>


], well known as one of the defendants in the ] trial, attracted extensive media coverage as a spokesperson for Rawat.<ref name="tvmeditating">"TV: Meditating on a Young Guru and His Followers", by John O'Connor, New York Times, 25 February 1974</ref><ref name="nytoz" /><ref>"Houston's Version of Peace in Our Time" GREGG KILDAY, Los Angeles Times 25 November 1973 p. S18</ref> At the event, Davis declared that "All I can say is, honestly, very soon now, every single human being will know the one who was waited for by every religion of all times has actually come."<ref name="Kent 2001, p. 52">Kent (2001), p. 52</ref> In a ] at Millennium, Rawat denied being the Messiah, and when asked by reporters about the contradictions between what he said about himself and what his followers said about him, Rawat replied, "Why don't you do me a favor&nbsp;... why don't you go to the devotees and ask their explanation about it?"<ref>Rolling Stone Magazine Issue N°156 – 14 March 1974 (Page 36-50)</ref> While Rawat's brother Satpal was nominally in charge of the festival, Davis was the "General Coordinator" and handled the details.<ref name="Collier 1978">Collier (1978)</ref>
Also in 1973 the U.K. DLM with Mata Ji acting as regent for her son, organized a major festival in the United Kingdom. The "Festival of Love" was held at ] in London. While it drew thousands of attendees, Rawat began receiving "increasingly hostile press coverage", one factor of which was his habit of showing up late, if at all, to scheduled appearances. Following the event the organization was directionless and underfunded.<ref>Price, Maeve (1979): "The Divine Light Mission as a social organization". ''Sociological Review'', 27, Page 279-296. "In Britain there was the Festival of Love at Alexandra Palace which drew thousands of premies and seekers, and where the unpredictable behaviour of Maharaj Ji antagonized the British press who had waited for hours for his scheduled appearance. ...A large membership had grown up very rapidly but the organizers had no clear idea where to lead the following, nor did they have the financial resources to maintain so many full-time workers...Guru Maharaj Ji's habit of arriving late, or not at all, for public programmes in Britain was doubtless a factor in his receiving an increasingly hostile press coverage which, in turn, may have contributed to the decline in recruitment which took place after the Alexandra Palace festival</ref>


Expectations for the event were very high, with predictions that it would attract more than 100,000,<ref>"A LOOK BACK AT THE '70S" HENRY ALLEN, Los Angeles Times 16 December 1979; p. K30</ref> or even as many as 400,000 people from Satpal. Davis privately said he thought 22,000 was a more realistic estimate and reserved 22,000 hotel beds.<ref>Collier (1978), p. 159</ref> There was even talk about a space in the parking lot reserved for a flying saucer to land.<ref name=autogenerated7>Kent (2001), p. 156</ref> When Satpal heard about the flying saucer he said, "If you see any, just give them some of our literature".<ref name=autogenerated1 />
===Prem Rawat assumes control of DLM in the West===
The actual attendance was estimated at 35,000, and at 10,000 by police.<ref name = "nytmillennium" /><ref>Foss & Larkin (1978), pp. 157-164 "in fact attended by a maximum of 35,000</ref>
Owing to Rawat's age, his mother, Mata Ji, had managed the affairs of the world wide DLM with the help of her eldest son Satpal. As Rawat approached sixteen he wanted to take a more active part in deciding the direction and management of the movement. According to Downton "this meant he had to encroach on his mother's territory and, given the fact that she was accustomed to having control, a fight was inevitable".<ref>Downton, James V. (1979). Sacred Journeys: The Conversion of Young Americans to Divine Light Mission. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-04198-5.Chapter 12 Changes in the Movement</ref><ref>Geaves, Ron, Globalization, charisma, innovation, and tradition: An exploration of the transformations in the organisational vehicles for the transmission of the teachings of Prem Rawat (Maharaji), 2006, Journal of Alternative Spiritualities and New Age Studies, 2 44-62</ref> In December 1973, when he turned 16, Rawat took administrative control of the Mission's U.S. branch and began to assert his independence from his mother. In May 1974 he applied to become an ] and, in direct defiance of his mother's wishes, married Marolyn Johnson, a 24-year old follower.<ref>Melton J. Gordon Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America. New York/London: Garland, 1986 (revised edition), ISBN 0-8240-9036-5, pp. 141-145</ref>


The event featured spectacular staging, a 56-piece rock band and a giant video screen that showed a barrage of shots from the tumultuous 1960s.<ref name="autogenerated5" /><ref name = "nytmillennium">"Guru's Followers Cheer 'Millennium' in Festivities in Astrodome", by Eleanor Blau, New York Times, 12 November 1973</ref><ref>"Maharaji Ji: The Selling of a Guru, 1973", by Gregg Killday, Los Angeles Times, 13 November 1973, p. D1</ref> Though it was not covered by the national television news, it did get extensive coverage in the print media. The premies were reported to be "cheerful, friendly and unruffled, and seemed nourished by their faith". To the 400 premie parents who attended, Rawat "was a rehabilitator of prodigal sons and daughters".<ref>"Oz in the Astrodome" Ted Morgen New York Times</ref> Media people found a "confused jumble of inarticulately expressed ideas."<ref>Collier (1978), p. 176</ref> It was depicted in the award-winning U.S. documentary ] broadcast by ] in 1974.<ref name="tvmeditating" /><ref>"Videotape Explorers on the Trail of a Guru" by Dick Adler, Los Angeles Times, 23 February 1974 p. B2</ref> The event was called the "youth culture event of the year".<ref name="Foss & Larkin 1978">Foss & Larkin (1978)</ref> Singer-songwriter ] visited the festival and later remarked that while the premies inside were looking happy the ones outside were arguing with ]s and ]. Wainwright's song "I am the Way" was partly inspired by Prem Rawat.<ref>"They Won't Boo Loudon Any Longer", Grace Lichtenstein, ''New York Times'', 3 February 1974</ref>
Rawat's decision to marry a Westerner, rather than the Indian woman his mother had planned on, precipitated a struggle for control.<ref> Cagan, A. Peace is Possible: The Life and Message of Prem Rawat. Mighty River Press. ISBN 0-9788694-9-4, Page 198</ref><ref>New Religions: A Guide: New Religious Movements, Sects and Alternative Spiritualities pp.201-202, Oxford University Press, USA (2004) ISBN 978-0195220421</ref>His mother claimed that Rawat had broken his spiritual discipline by marrying and becoming a "playboy". She returned to India and appointed Satpal, as the new head of DLM but the Western premies remained loyal to Rawat.<ref>Melton J. Gordon Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America. New York/London: Garland, 1986 (revised edition), ISBN 0-8240-9036-5, pp. 141-145</ref> The marriage led to a permanent rift with his mother and it was also credited with causing a profound disruption in the movement. Many followers left the ashrams to get married and produce their own children and the base of support inevitably shifted from the ashrams to the wider premie community.<ref>Melton J. Gordon Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America. New York/London: Garland, 1986 (revised edition), ISBN 0-8240-9036-5, pp. 141-145</ref> Others felt "almost betrayed", in part because he had championed celibacy before getting married himself.<ref>Price, Maeve (1979): "The Divine Light Mission as a social organization". ''Sociological Review'', 27, Page 279-296. "When Maharaj Ji began to assert his independence from his mother, both as an individual and as a leader, the mission entered a period of crises, internal conflict and consequent recession. (25) In May 1974, Maharaj Ji married an American girl, Marolyn Johnson (now called Durga Ji), in direct defiance of his mother's wishes and the event shook the mission to its foundations. This marriage brought about an exodus from the ashrams, the stable core of the mission which had been a vital means of social control, as premies flocked to get married and began to produce their own children, within customary marriage structures. It was an important turning point for the mission. The followers seemed to grow up overnight into adults with normal family responsibilities and ties. The base of support inevitably shifted from the ashrams to the wider premie community. This meant that central control was very much weakened and that the ordinary, non-ashram premie began to play a more important role in determining the mission's fortunes. At the same time, many premies were shaken by the marriage and felt almost betrayed by their leader. It is apparent that the marriage was responsible for a loss of morale and therefore of support for the mission by many premies. "</ref><ref>Richardson, James T., in ''Encyclopedia of Religion and Society'', William H. Swatos, ed., Rowman Altamira 1998 p.141 ISBN 0761989560 "Also, the guru married his Caucasian secretary in 1974 when he was 17, shocking many of his followers (he had championed celibacy until his marriage) and leading to many defections."</ref><ref>Olson, Carl. ''The Many Colors of Hinduism: A Thematic-Historical Introduction''. 2007 Rutgers University Press. ISBN 0813540682 p. 345 "The movement split after Guru Maharaj Ji married his American secretary and broke his vow of celibacy. "</ref>


At the festival, Larry Bernstein, a prize-winning, 41-year-old architect described a "Divine City" to be built from the ground up starting the following year. It was to feature translucent hexagonal plastic houses stacked on concrete columns and connected with monorails. Polluting vehicles would be replaced by electric vehicles, and solar power would be used to provide energy. Cards would replace cash. The use of advanced technologies to ensure pollution-free air, Rennie Davis told a journalist, would be a practical demonstration of what it means to have Heaven on Earth.<ref name=autogenerated12>Kopkind (1995), p. 234</ref> Two sites were suggested: either the ] or somewhere near ].<ref name="nytoz">"Oz in the Astrodome", by Ted Morgan, New York Times, 9 December 1973</ref><ref name=autogenerated7 /> The former president and vice president of the DLM later said that Prem Rawat had spoken frequently of building such a city.<ref name=autogenerated11>"Two ex-cult officers see possible Guyana repeat", UPI, ''Newport Rhode Island Daily News'' 25 November 1978. p. 8</ref> Plans for the city were delayed amid the fiscal crisis following the Millennium festival.<ref name = "isbn0-8423-6417-X"/> Incorporation papers for the formation of the "City of Love and Light Unlimited, Inc." were filed in Colorado in 1974, and there was a failed attempt in 1975 to build the community near San Antonio, Texas.<ref>Rudin & Rudin (1980), p. 62</ref>
DLM's post Millennium financial troubles forced it to close ashrams, sell its printing business and real estate, and to drop the lease on its IBM computer. Monthly donations fell from $100,000 to $30,000. The setbacks caused by the bad press from the festivals, along with the rift caused by Prem Rawat's marriage in 1974, marked the end of the movement's growth phase.<ref>"Guru Maharaj Ji." Religious Leaders of America, 2nd ed. Gale Group, 1999. Reproduced in Biography Resource Center. Farmington Hills, Mich.: Gale, 2008 </ref><ref>"Guru Maharaj Ji." Encyclopedia of Occultism and Parapsychology, 5th ed. Gale Group, 2001. Reproduced in Biography Resource Center. Farmington Hills, Mich.: Gale, 2008. </ref><ref>"A LOOK BACK AT THE '70S" HENRY ALLEN, Los Angeles Times Dec 16, 1979; p. K30</ref><ref>Price, Maeve (1979): "The Divine Light Mission as a social organization". ''Sociological Review'', 27, Page 279-296.</ref>


The DLM incurred a debt estimated between $600,000 and over $1 million, attributed to poor management and low attendance.<ref>Khalsa (1986)</ref><ref name=autogenerated10>Stoner & Parke (1977)</ref><ref name="Pilarzyk 1978">Pilarzyk (1978)</ref> The debt severely damaged the DLM's finances.<ref name="Foss & Larkin 1978"/><ref>Messer in Glock & Bellah (1976), p. 67</ref> Event-related expenses were covered by short-term credit based on the expectation that contributions would pour in following the free festival.<ref>Collier (1978), p. 166</ref> DLM's post-Millennium financial troubles forced it to close ashrams, sell its printing business and real estate, and to drop the lease on its IBM computer. Monthly donations fell from $100,000 to $70,000.<ref name="GuruFollDown">"Guru following down; tactics changing", UPI, ''Waterloo Courier'' 25 November 1976</ref> According to Messer, "to pay the debts remaining from the Houston event, devotees all over the country turned over their own possessions to Divine Sales, which had crash garage sales, attended flea markets, and invented numerous activities to dispose of the goods."<ref name="Messer, 1976">Messer, 1976</ref> By 1976 it was able to reduce the debt to $80,000.<ref>"Growing Pile of Unpaid Bills Beneath Guru's Spiritual Bliss", Deborah Frazier, UPI, 23 March 1975, Lincoln, Neb., Sunday Journal and Star</ref> Consequently, the festival necessitated policy shifts within the movement organization.<ref name="Pilarzyk 1978"/>
Following the rift with his mother, Rawat announced that he was replacing the predominantly Indian image with a Western one and began to wear business suits instead of his all-white Indian attire.<ref>Melton J. Gordon Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America. New York/London: Garland, 1986 (revised edition), ISBN 0-8240-9036-5, pp. 141-145</ref><ref name="GuruFollDown">"Guru following down; tactics changing", UPI, ''Waterloo Courier'' Nov. 25, 1976</ref>


===Marriage and rift===
In 1975 Prem Rawat returned to India in an attempt to gain control of the Indian DLM. A court-ordered settlement resulted in his eldest brother Satpal retaining control of the Indian DLM, while Rawat maintained control of the DLM outside of India.<ref>Lewis, James R. ''The encyclopedia of cults, sects, and new religions''. Amherst, N.Y. : Prometheus Books, 1998. ISBN 1573922226 p 301</ref> In the United Kingdom Mataji maintained her control of the DLM but the organizing center was shifted to the Divine United Organization by Rawat's followers.<ref>Price, Maeve (1979): "The Divine Light Mission as a social organization". ''Sociological Review'', 27, Page 279-296. "In Britain a long wrangle ensued over the legal control of DLM as Maharaj Ji was not yet of age, but Mata Ji was out-manoevred by Maharaj Ji's supporters who by-passed the officially registered Divine Light Mission and used Divine United Organization (DUO) (which had already been established in 1973 to co-ordinate the mission's activities) and this became the mission's operational headquarters."</ref>
Because of Prem Rawat's age, Jagat janni Mata Ji, his mother, and her eldest son, Satpal Rawat (later known as Satpal Ji Maharaj) had managed the affairs of the worldwide DLM. As Prem Rawat approached sixteen he wanted to take a more active part in guiding the movement. According to Downton, "this meant he had to encroach on his mother's territory and, given the fact that she was accustomed to having control, a fight was inevitable".<ref name=autogenerated2>Downton (1979), ch. 12</ref><ref name="Geaves2006">Geaves (2006)</ref> In December 1973, when he turned 16, Rawat took administrative control of the Mission's U.S. branch and began to assert his independence from his mother who returned to India with Satpal.<ref name="autogenerated5"/>


In May 1974, a judge gave Rawat his consent to marry without parental permission.<ref>"Guru, 16, marries secretary" AP Tues. 21 May 1974 ''Greeley Tribune''</ref> His marriage to his secretary, Marolyn Johnson, a 24-year-old follower from ], was celebrated at a non-denominational church in ].<ref>"The Guru's Wife Is Another Devotee", Robert P. Dalton, AP Staff Writer, ''Oakland Tribune''. 23 May 1974.</ref> Rawat's mother, Mata Ji, had not been invited.<ref>Downton (1979), p. 191.</ref> As a result of his marriage, Rawat became an ]. He called his wife "Durga Ji", after the Hindu goddess ].<ref>{{Cite magazine| issn=0040-781X| title = One Lord Too Many| magazine = Time| access-date = 2009-05-31| date = 28 April 1975| url = http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,917390,00.html| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080214000406/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,917390,00.html| url-status = dead| archive-date = 14 February 2008}}<br/>{{Cite book |publisher = Cornerstone |isbn =978-0-940895-03-4 |last = Mangalwadi |first = Vishal |author-link = Vishal Mangalwadi |title = The world of gurus |location = Chicago, Ill. |year = 1992}}<br/>{{Cite book|publisher = Garland Pub. |isbn = 978-0-8240-9036-4 |last = Melton |first = J. Gordon. |author-link = J. Gordon Melton |title = The encyclopedic handbook of cults in America |location = New York |series = Garland reference library of social science, v. 213 |year = 1986 |url = https://archive.org/details/encyclopedichand00melt }}<br/>{{Cite book |publisher = ABC-CLIO |isbn = 978-0-585-05843-6 |last = Lewis |first = James |author2=NetLibrary, Inc. |title = Cults in America a reference handbook |url = https://archive.org/details/cultsinamericare0000lewi |url-access = registration |location = Santa Barbara Calif. |date = 1998a}}</ref><ref name=autogenerated5 />
As the Mission continued to Westernize, the Indian mahatmas were replaced with Western ones, Indian terminology fell from use and Rawat encouraged premies to leave the ashram. <ref>Downton, James V. (1979). Sacred Journeys: The Conversion of Young Americans to Divine Light Mission. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-04198-5.Chapter 12 Changes in the Movement</ref>According to estimates, the worldwide membership had declined from 6 million to 1.2 million by 1976,<ref name="GuruFollDown" /> and in the U.S. the 50,000 initiates had dwindled to 15,000 regular contributors.<ref name="GuruStyle" /> One estimate had from 500 to 1200 members living in ashrams in the mid-1970s.<ref>Bomley and Shupe, 1981, p. 43</ref> By the end of the 1970s the movement had lost an estimated 80% of its followers in the U.S.<ref>Lewis, James R. ''Cults in America''. ABC-CLIO, Inc. Santa Barbara, 1998. p 83</ref> Bromley and Hammond attribute the decline of groups including the Divine Light Mission to internal factors, but also in part to the news media's "discrediting reports about their activities", accounts which created a "wide-spread public perception of 'mind control' and other 'cult' stereotypes."<ref name="isbn0-865-54238-4">Bromley, Hammond, 1983: 113-4, 227</ref>


Rawat's decision to marry a Westerner precipitated a struggle for control of DLM.<ref name="Partridge 2004 pp.201-202">Geaves in Partridge (2004), pp.201-202</ref> His mother claimed that Rawat had broken his spiritual discipline by marrying, and had become a "playboy". She appointed Satpal as the new head of DLM India, but the Western premies remained loyal to Rawat.<ref name=autogenerated5 /> The marriage led to a permanent rift between Prem Rawat and his mother, and was also credited with causing a profound disruption in the movement. Many followers left the ashrams to get married, and the base of support inevitably shifted from the ashrams to the wider premie community.<ref name=autogenerated5 /> Others felt "almost betrayed", in part because he had championed celibacy, one of the requirements of ashram life, before getting married himself.<ref name="Price 1979"/><ref name="Pilarzyk 1978"/><ref>Richardson in Swatos (1998), p.141</ref><ref>Olson (2007), p. 345</ref>
The Divine Light Mission attracted the attention of the ] and some members were ] and even kidnapped.<ref>"Cult Deprogrammer Patrick Sentenced to Year in Kidnaping", JACK JONES. ''Los Angeles Times'' Sep 27, 1980, pg. SD_A1</ref> Some former members became outspoken critics of the organization and attacked the group with standard anti-cult charges of brainwashing and mind control. In reference to ex-followers, Anctil said that "A lot of people were just on a trip in the beginning. They felt they had to be 'hyped', and some didn't stay long enough to get beyond that. But we've changed as our understanding has changed."<ref name="GuruStyle">"Guru's cult changing style" GEORGE CORNELL, AP Religion Writer</ref><ref>Melton, Gordon J. Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America, (1986), p. 219–222 Garland Publishing, ISBN 0-8240-9036-5</ref> Bob Mishler, the founding president of the DLM in the U.S., left the organization in 1977 and gave an interview in 1979, along with the former vice president, in which he accused the DLM of becoming a "tax evasion for the guru", and said he feared a repeat of ].<ref>"FIRM LOYALTY: Guru's Sect: Misgivings in Malibu" MARK FORSTER ''Los Angeles Times'' Jan 12, 1979; pg. A1. </ref><ref>"Two ex-cult officers see possible Guyana repeat", UPI, ''Newport Rhode Island Daily News'' November 25, 1978. p. 8</ref> Mishler's charges found little support and did not affect the progress of the Mission.<ref>Melton J. Gordon Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America. New York/London: Garland, 1986 (revised edition), ISBN 0-8240-9036-5, pp. 141-145</ref>
The bad press from the festivals and the rift caused by Prem Rawat's marriage in 1974 marked the end of the movement's growth phase.<ref name="Price 1979"/><ref name="autogenerated10"/><ref>Melton (1999)</ref><ref>Melton (2001)</ref>


In 1975, Prem Rawat returned to India in an attempt to gain control of the Indian DLM. A court-ordered settlement resulted in his eldest brother Satpal retaining control of the Indian DLM, while Rawat maintained control of the DLM outside of India.<ref name=autogenerated9 />
In the 1980s, the Rawat-led DLM became more Western as he removed the Indian trappings from his message and adopted a more universal style.<ref>Lippy, Charles H. ''Pluralism Comes of Age: American Religious Culture in the Twentieth Century'' p.114, M. E. Sharpe (2002), ISBN 0-7656-0151-6<br />
"The Divine Light Mission, for example, in the 1980s became Elan Vital and dropped most of its Asian trappings."</ref> Prem Rawat was no longer to be venerated as a god or regarded as a Perfect Master.<ref>Lewis, James R. ''Cults in America''. ABC-CLIO, Inc. Santa Barbara, 1998. p 83</ref><ref>Miller, Tomothy. ''America's Alternative Religions'', 1995, SUNY Press ISBN 0791423972 p. 364</ref> The ashrams were closed, as were the Denver headquarters (1979), and the organisation's name was changed to ] in 1983, by filing an entity name change.<ref></ref><ref> Elan Vital FAQs - About Elan Vital, Inc. (Retrieved May, 2006)</ref> Similar name changes occurred in the U.K. (in 1991), Australia, and France (in 1987).<ref>Abgrall, Jean-Marie . ''Soul Snatchers: The Mechanics of Cults'' Algora Publishing 2000 ISBN 189294104X p. 285</ref> Since then the Elan Vital has been "virtually invisible." Rawat stopped granting interviews and making public announcements of his visits.<ref>Melton, Gordon J. Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America, (1986), pp 221 222 Garland Publishing, ISBN 0-8240-9036-5</ref>


===Westernization===
According to ], a follower and religious scholar:
Following the rift with his mother, Rawat announced that he was replacing the predominantly Indian image with a Western one and began to wear business suits instead of his all-white Indian attire.<ref name=autogenerated5 /> The Indian mahatmas were replaced with Westerners, and Indian terminology fell from use. Rawat encouraged premies to leave the ashrams.<ref name=autogenerated2 /> According to one estimate, the worldwide membership had declined from 6 million to 1.2 million by 1976,<ref name="GuruFollDown" /> and in the U.S. the 50,000 claimed initiates had dwindled to 15,000 regular contributors.<ref name="GuruStyle"/> A spokesman for the Mission explained in 1976 that the higher numbers had been inflated due to poor record-keeping.<ref>"Guru Maharaj Ji To Launch World Tour To Aid Mission" UPI, PLAYGROUND DAILY NEWS, 15 April 1976-Page 3E</ref> One estimate had from 500 to 1200 members living in ashrams in the mid-1970s.<ref>Bromley & Shupe (1981), p. 43</ref> By the end of the 1970s, the movement had lost an estimated 80% of its followers in the U.S.<ref name=autogenerated4>Lewis (1998), p. 83</ref> Bromley and Hammond attribute the decline of groups including the Divine Light Mission to internal factors, but also in part to the news media's "discrediting reports about their activities", accounts which created a "wide-spread public perception of 'mind control' and other 'cult' stereotypes."<ref name="isbn0-865-54238-4">Bromley & Hammond (1987), pp. 113-4, 227</ref>
<blockquote>Maharaji has chosen a route of perpetual transformation in which organizational forms are created and utilized and then destroyed, thus providing flexibility to deal with rapidly changing social attitudes, to provide pragmatic solutions to internal problems, and above all to keep his students focused on the core message rather than the peripheral requirements of organizational forms.<ref>Geaves, Ron, From Divine Light Mission to Elan Vital and Beyond: An Exploration of Change and Adaptation, Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, March 2004, Vol. 7, No. 3, Pages 45-62.</ref></blockquote>
According to the ''Encyclopedia of American Religions,'' the mission was disbanded Prem Rawat personally renounced the trappings of Indian culture and religion, to make his teachings independent of culture, beliefs and lifestyles.<ref name="EnAmRe">Melton, Gordon, ''Encyclopedia of American Religions'' 7th edition. Thomson (2003) p.2328 ISBN 0-7876-6384-0<br />"In the early 1980s, Maharaj Ji moved to disband the Divine Light Mission and he personally renounced the trappings of Indian culture and religion, disbanding the mission, he founded Elan Vital, an organization to support his future role as teacher." Maharaji had made every attempt to abandon the traditional Indian religious trappings in which the techniques originated and to make his presentation acceptable to all the various cultural settings in which followers live. He sees his teachings as independent of culture, religion, beliefs, or lifestyles, and regularly addresses audiences in places as culturally diverse as India, Japan, Taiwan, the Ivory Coast, Slovenia, Mauritius and Venezuela, as well as North America, Europe and the South Pacific.</ref><ref>Melton, Gordon, ''Encyclopedia of American Religions 7th edition. Thomson (2003) p.2328 ISBN 0-7876-7702-7''<br /> "In the early 1980s, Maharaj Ji moved to disband the Divine Light Mission and he personally renounced the trappings of Indian culture and religion. Disbanding the mission, he founded Elan Vital, an organization suited to his future role as teacher." Maharaji had made every attempt to abandon the traditional Indian religious trappings in which the techniques originated and to make his presentation acceptable to all the various cultural settings in which followers live. He sees his teachings as independent of culture, religion, beliefs, or lifestyles, and regularly addresses audiences in places as culturally diverse as India, Japan, Taiwan, the Ivory Coast, Slovenia, Mauritius and Venezuela, as well as North America, Europe and the South Pacific.</ref> Prem Rawat asked to be referred to as "Maharaji" instead of "Guru Maharaj Ji." At the close of 2007
<ref>
{{cite web
|url=http://contactinfo.net/events.cfm
|title=Contact Info - Events
|publisher=contactinfo.net
|accessdate=2008-04-19
|last=
|first=
}}
</ref>
he was continuing to write, lecture, and tour actively.


The Divine Light Mission also attracted the attention of the ]. Some members were violently kidnapped and ].<ref>"Cult Deprogrammer Patrick Sentenced to Year in Kidnaping", JACK JONES. ''Los Angeles Times'' 27 September 1980, pg. SD_A1</ref> Some former members became outspoken critics of the organization and attacked the group with what Melton calls "standard anti-cult charges of brainwashing and mind control".<ref>Melton (1986), p. 222</ref> In reference to ex-followers, DLM spokesman Joe Anctil said that "A lot of people were just on a trip in the beginning. They felt they had to be 'hyped', and some didn't stay long enough to get beyond that. But we've changed as our understanding has changed."<ref name="GuruStyle">"Guru's cult changing style" GEORGE CORNELL, AP Religion Writer</ref><ref>Melton (1986), p. 219</ref> Bob Mishler, the founding president of the DLM in the U.S., was removed by Rawat in 1977 and gave an interview in 1979, along with the former vice president, in which he said he was concerned that the DLM was becoming a "tax evasion for the guru", and said he feared a repeat of ]. They also accused Rawat of engaging in inappropriate behavior.<ref name=autogenerated11 /><ref>"FIRM LOYALTY: Guru's Sect: Misgivings in Malibu" MARK FORSTER ''Los Angeles Times'' 12 January 1979; pg. A1.</ref> Mishler's charges found little support and did not affect the progress of the Mission.<ref name=autogenerated5 />
===DLM in India===


In the 1980s, Prem Rawat removed the Indian trappings from his message, and adopted a more Western style.<ref name="Hunt 2003, pp.116-7"/><ref>Lippy (2002) p. 114</ref> Melton said the mission was disbanded Prem Rawat personally renounced the trappings of Indian culture and religion, to make his teachings independent of culture, beliefs and lifestyles.<ref name="EnAmRe">Melton (2003), p.2328</ref> Prem Rawat was no longer to be venerated as a god or regarded as a Perfect Master.<ref name=autogenerated4 /><ref name="EnAmRe" /><ref>Miller (1995), p. 364</ref> The ashrams were closed along with the Denver headquarters (1979). The Divine Light Mission organization was replaced by ];<ref>Abgrall (2000), p. 285</ref><ref>Geaves, Ron. "From Guru Maharaj Ji to Prem Rawat: Paradigm Shifts over the Period of 40 Years as a 'Master'". In: {{Cite book | last1 = Gallagher | first1 = Eugene V. | last2 = Ashcraft | first2 = W. Michael (eds.) | title = Introduction to New and Alternative Religions in America | place = Westport CT | publisher = Greenwood Press | year = 2006 | volume = 4 | pages = 71–73 | isbn = 978-0-275-98712-1}}</ref> the U.S. organization's name was changed to Elan Vital in 1983, by filing an entity name change.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sos.state.co.us/biz/ViewImage.do;jsessionid=0000x3kyxhvQmIUOPNwkHlTDN7v:10e81ru5k?masterFileId=19871234276&fileId=19871509395 |title=Colorado Secretary of State, Business Center. |access-date=2014-07-17}}</ref><ref>Elan Vital FAQs – About Elan Vital, Inc. (Retrieved May, 2006)</ref> Prem Rawat asked to be referred to as "Maharaji" instead of "Guru Maharaj Ji."
In 1975 Mataji, took control of the DLM in India as a result of the rift and installed Rawat's eldest brother as its head. The eldest brother Satpal claims in his website that his father, ], had "bequeathed his mission and unfinished work" to him.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.manavdharam.org/ssjm/1_brief_into.html |title=Satpal Ji Maharaj |format= |work= |accessdate=April 2008}}</ref> Scholars that have written about the succession report the contrary, and it is clear that Satpal and the rest of the family accepted and supported Prem's declaration of succession for eight years.<ref>] ''The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Active New Religions, Sects and Cults'' (1997), ISBN 0-8239-1505-0 p.85 "Divine Light Mission". "When the founder died in 1966, the eight-year old Pretap stood up at the funeral to announce his ascent to the throne and became the movement's recognized leader. Maharaj Ji was considered ], or the Perfect Master."</ref><ref>] ''Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America'', (1986), pp.141-2 entry Divine Light Mission Garland Publishing, ISBN 0-8240-9036-5 <br>"Just six years after the founding of the Mission, Shri Hans Ji Maharaj was succeeded by his younger son Prem Pal Singh Rawat, who was eight when he was recognized as the new Perfect Master and assumed the title, Maharaj Ji. Maharaj Ji had been recognized as spiritually adept, even within the circle of the Holy Family as Shri Hans family was called. He had been initiated at the age of six He assumed the role of Perfect Master at his father's funeral by telling the disciples who had gathered. Though officially the autocratic leader of the Mission, because of Maharaji's age authority was shared by the whole family."</ref><ref name=USChaplains>
U. S. Department of the Army, ''Religious Requirements and Practices of Certain Selected Groups: A Handbook for Chaplains'' (2001) pp.11-5 , The Minerva Group, ISBN 0-89875-607-3<br />"Following his death, Shri Hans Ji Maharaj appointed the youngest of his four sons, Sant Ji, as the next Perfect Master and thereby the assumed head of Divine Light Mission as decreed by his father. Since that time, Guru Maharaj Ji has inspired a world wide movement and the Mission is active in 55 countries."</ref> A lawsuit in India resulted in his brother Satpal gaining control of the Divine Light Mission in India, and Rawat continuing to lead DLM in the rest of the world.<ref>J. Gordon Melton, Christopher Partridge (Eds.), ''New Religions: A Guide. New Religious Movements, Sects and Alternative Spiritualities.'' pp.201-202, Oxford University Press, USA (2004) ISBN 978-0195220421. <br />"As Maharaji began to grow older and establish his teachings worldwide he increasingly desired to manifest his own vision of development and growth. This conflict resulted in a split between Maharaji and his family, ostensibly caused by his mother's inability to accept Maharaji's marriage to an American follower rather than the planned traditional arranged marriage."</small></ref><ref>Downton, ''Sacred Journeys.'' "Nearly sixteen, he was ready to assume a more active part in deciding what direction the movement should take. This of course meant that he had to encroach on his mother's territory and, given the fact that she was accustomed to having control, a fight was inevitable." </small></ref><ref >name="thomsonwife">"Guru Maharaj Ji", ''Biography Resource Center''. ], ], 2007. The marriage further disrupted his relationship with his mother and older brothers. A lawsuit in India gave control of the Indian branch of the Divine Light Mission to Maharaj's mother and led to a complete break with her son, who maintained the complete support of the Western disciples.</ref>


According to ], a religious scholar who has been associated with the teachings of Prem Rawat for the last thirty years:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://rongeaves.com/ |title="A Statement from Dr. Ron Geaves" September 27, 2004 |access-date=2014-07-17 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071120235856/http://rongeaves.com/ |archive-date=20 November 2007 }}</ref>
Satpal, now known as Shri Satpal Ji Maharaj, continues to teach "Manav Dharam" (the "Dharam (Religion) of Mankind"). He is also a politician in India, and founded Manav Utthan Sewa Samiti which he describes as "an all-India registered voluntary social welfare and charitable organization", that is also "making freely available the spiritual Knowledge which is the essence of all religions."<ref>{{cite web|year = 2008|url = http://www.manavdharam.org | title= Manav Dharam |accessdate = 2008-03-09}}</ref>
<blockquote>Maharaji has chosen a route of perpetual transformation in which organizational forms are created and utilized and then destroyed, thus providing flexibility to deal with rapidly changing social attitudes, to provide pragmatic solutions to internal problems, and above all to keep his students focused on the core message rather than the peripheral requirements of organizational forms.<ref>Geaves (2004), pp. 45-62</ref></blockquote>
Since then the Elan Vital has been "virtually invisible." Rawat stopped granting interviews and making public announcements of his visits.<ref>Melton (1986), pp. 221, 222</ref> As of 2008, he has continued to write, lecture, and tour with the support of the Elan Vital and the Prem Rawat Foundation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://contactinfo.net/previous_events.cfm|title=Contact Info – Events|publisher=contactinfo.net|access-date=2008-04-19}}</ref>


===DLM in India===
The '''Divine United Organization''' (DUO) was an organization registered under the Societies Registration Act 21 of 1860 with the Registrar of ] in 1977, to disseminate the teachings of ] (known also as Balyogeshwar) in India.

In 1975, Mata Ji took control of the DLM in India as a result of the rift and installed her eldest son, ], as its head. A lawsuit in India resulted in his brother Satpal gaining control of the Divine Light Mission in India, and Rawat continuing to lead DLM in the rest of the world.<ref>Melton in Partridge (2004), pp.201-202</ref><ref>Downton (1979)</ref><ref name="thomsonwife">''Biography Resource Center''. ], ], 2007</ref>


Satpal Rawat, now known as Shri Satpal Ji Maharaj, teaches "Manav Dharam" (the "Dharam of Mankind"). He is also a politician and former ] in India, and founded Manav Utthan Sewa Samiti, which he describes as "an all-India registered voluntary social welfare and charitable organization", that is also "making freely available the spiritual Knowledge which is the essence of all religions."<ref>{{cite web|year = 2008|url = http://www.manavdharam.org | title= Manav Dharam |access-date = 2008-03-09}}</ref> Satpal Rawat's supporters now assert that he is the rightful successor to his father, ].<ref>McKean, (1996), p. 54</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.manavdharam.org/ssjm/1_brief_into.html |title=Satpal Ji Maharaj |access-date= |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060217210705/http://www.manavdharam.org/ssjm/1_brief_into.html |archive-date=17 February 2006 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Scholars that have written about the succession report that Satpal and the rest of the family accepted and supported Prem's declaration of succession for eight years.<ref name="Melton 1986, pp.141-2"/><ref>Beit-Hallahami (1997), p.85</ref><ref name=USChaplains>United States (2001), pp. 11-5</ref>
Shri Sant Ji Maharaj was one of honorary names given to Prem Rawat by his students in India.


The Divine United Organization (DUO) was an organization registered under the Societies Registration Act 21 of 1860<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.scribd.com/document/337921744/Sant-Mat-pdf|title=Sant_Mat.pdf {{!}} Bhakti Movement {{!}} Religious Comparison|via=Scribd|language=en|access-date=2018-03-22}}</ref> with the Registrar of ] in 1977, to disseminate the teachings of Prem Rawat in India. According to Geaves, DUO remained in India until it was replaced by '''Raj Vidya Bhavan''' .<ref name="Geaves2006" /> '''Raj Vidya Kender''' (Center for the King of Knowledge) states on its website that it was registered under the societies Registration Act in 1977, with registration No. 8845/77, "by individuals eager to help in the dissemination of Maharaji's message of hope and peace."<ref name="RVKabout"> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080514022036/http://www.rajvidyakender.org/aboutus.html |date=14 May 2008 }}</ref>
DUO was replaced in recent years by the '''Raj Vidya Kender''' (Center for the King of Knowledge), in ], India.


==Beliefs and practices== ==Beliefs and practices==
{{details|Teachings of Prem Rawat}} {{Further|Techniques of Knowledge|Teachings of Prem Rawat}}
According to some scholars, Shri Hans was influenced by both the ] tradition and the ]. ] wrote that from the former came the reduction of Hinduism to the inner realization of the divine and the veneration of the guru, and from the latter the emphasis on the practical life. Hummel also noted that the DLM never developed a systematic doctrine, either during Hans' time or Prem Rawat's time. Hummel also asserted that the influence of the North Indian Sant tradition was dominant in Hans' ] thinking, and that from the Sant tradition also came the rejection of outward rituals and ceremonies; the rejection of asceticism in favor of life as a householder; the rejection of veneration of idols and the focus on the guru as the manifestation of the divine. Hummel further wrote that ] are of central importance to Prem, as they were to Hans.<ref>] ''Indische Mission und neue Frömmigkeit im Westen. Religiöse Bewegungen in westlichen Kulturen'', Stuttgart 1980, ISBN 3-17-005609-3, <br>pp.76-77: :pp.76-77: "Eine systematisch entwickelte Lehre hat die Divine Light Mission weder zur Zeit des Vaters Śhrī Hans noch des Sohnes besessen. Beide haben darin eher einen Vorzug als einen Mangel gesehen. Hatte der Vater sich vornehmlich als »Guru der Armen« verstanden und sich in einer bilderreichen Sprache mehr um praktische Anwendbarkeit als um theoretische Durchdringung bemüht, so blieb doch der Inhalt seiner Satsangs auf dem Hintergrund der Hinduistischen Tradition klar verständlich. Die Satsangs jedoch, die der Sohn im Westen gehalten hat und die mit einem Minimum hinduistischer Terminologie und Konzepte auskommen, müssen für den nichthinduistischen Hörer vage bleiben. Der junge Guru erklärt das konzeptionelle Denken, das auch in deutschen Übersetzungen mit dem englischen Wort »mind« bezeichnet wird, als Hauptfeind der unmittelbaren religösen Erfahrung. So ist es nicht verwunderlich, daß von seinen Anhängern nur wenig Handfestes über die DLM-lehre zu erfahren ist. Anderseits eröffnet ihnen der Mangel an vorgegebenen Konzepten einen Freiraum für Äußerungen einer spontanen Subjektivität, die wohltuend vom unselbständigen Reproduzieren autoritativ verkündeter Lehren absticht, wie man es vor allem bei den Anhängern der ] antrifft. Wie auch immer die Bewertung ausfallen mag – die geistige Konturlosigkeit der Bewegung fällt allen Beobachtern auf. Im Zentrum steht bei Vater und Sohn die vierfache Meditationstechnik, die vier »Kriyas«, die Sri Hans von Svami Sarupanand gelernt hatte. " p. 78: "Innerhalb dieses eklektischen Denkens dominiert der Einfluß der in Nordindien beheimateten Sant-Tradition, der schon in der Geschichte des Radhasoami Satsang wirksam war. Von ihr bestimmt ist die Ablehnung äußerlicher Rituale und Zeremonien und die Forderung, das Göttliche im eigenen Inneren zu suchen; damit verbunden die Polemik gegen den trennenden Charakter der in Äußerlichkeiten erstarrten Religionen und gegen die Kastentrennung; ferner die Ablehnung der Askese zugunsten des Lebens im Stande des Haushalters, wie Sri Hans es selbst geführt hat; die Ablehnung der Bilderverehrung und die Konzentration auf den Guru als die Manifestation des Göttlichen; "</ref> According to some scholars, Shri Hans was influenced by both the ] tradition and the ]. ] wrote that from the former came the reduction of Hinduism to the inner realization of the divine and the veneration of the guru, and from the latter the emphasis on the practical life. Hummel also noted that the DLM never developed a systematic doctrine, either during Hans' time or Prem Rawat's time. Hummel further asserted that the influence of the North Indian Sant tradition was dominant in Hans' ] thinking, and that from the Sant tradition also came the rejection of outward rituals and ceremonies; the rejection of asceticism in favor of life as a householder; the rejection of veneration of idols, and the focus on the guru as the manifestation of the divine. Hummel also noted that ] are of central importance to Prem, as they were to Hans.<ref>Hummel (1980), pp.76-77</ref>


No rules or regulations were imposed, and no beliefs or ethical practices were taught.<ref>Ron Geaves in Christopher Partridge (Eds.), New Religions: A Guide: New Religious Movements, Sects and Alternative Spiritualities pp.201-202, Oxford University Press, USA (2004) ISBN 978-0195220421 Maharaji asserts that he is not teaching a religion and there are no particular rituals, sacred days, pilgrimages, sacred places, doctrines, scriptures or specific dress codes, dietary requirements or any other dimension associated with a religious lifestyle.</ref><ref>Messer, Jeanne. 1976 "Guru Maharaj Ji and the Divine Light Mission," in Charles Y. Glock and Robert N. Bellah, eds. The New Religious Consciousness. Berkeley: University of CaliforniaPress. pp.52-72. ISBN 0-52003-472-4 His teaching consists simply of what he calls "giving knowledge," not of any extensive set of moral precepts. Unlike most Eastern religious teachers, he generally refuses to give concrete instructions regarding what one should eat, how one should make a living, or what one's disciplehood should involve.</ref> The fundamental practices of inner peace were embodied and experienced through ], service and ], the sum of which is an experience that ] calls "Knowledge." Members of the DLM meditated formally twice daily and attended discourses on the Knowledge (known as satsang) when possible. In a study by ] and ] former followers said that they had spent 32.9 hours per week in group-related processes and ritual and 19.9 hours in additional study or indoctrination (lectures, seminars, workshops etc).<ref>Conway, Flo & Siegelman, Jim. ''Snapping: America's Epidemic of Sudden Personality Change''. Stillpoint Press, New York, 1995, 2nd ed., p. 361</ref> Vegetarianism was encouraged but not enforced. No rules or regulations were imposed, and no beliefs or ethical practices were taught.<ref name="Partridge 2004 pp.201-202"/><ref name="Messer in Glock & Bellah 1976">Messer in Glock & Bellah (1976)</ref> The fundamental practices of inner peace were embodied and experienced through ], service and ], the sum of which is an experience called "Knowledge." Members of the DLM meditated formally twice daily and attended discourses on the Knowledge (known as satsang) when possible. According to Galanter "satsang could be delivered to active members or to those with only a casual interest. It was something of a polemic interspersed with parables, and because members were bright and sophisticated, these discourses tended to be engaging, making use of both Hindu mythology and Western philosophy". In a study by ] and ], former followers said that they had spent 32.9 hours per week in group-related processes and ritual and 19.9 hours in additional study or ] (lectures, seminars, workshops etc).<ref>Conway & Siegelman (1995), p. 361</ref> Vegetarianism was encouraged but not enforced except in ashrams and Divine Centers.


Five "commandments" were part of the Divine Light Mission's teachings:<ref name="isbn0-8423-6417-X">{{cite book |author=Larson, Bob |title=Larson's Book of World Religions and Alternative PUBLISHER: Tyndale House Publishers |publisher=Tyndale House Publishers |location=Wheaton, Ill |year=2004 |pages=p.151 |isbn=0-8423-6417-X |oclc= |doi=}}</ref> Five "commandments" were part of the Divine Light Mission's teachings:<ref name="isbn0-8423-6417-X">Larson (2004), p. 151</ref><ref>Levine, 1974</ref>
#Do not put off until tomorrow what you can do today. #Do not put off until tomorrow what you can do today.
#Constantly meditate and remember the Holy Name. #Constantly meditate and remember the Holy Name.
#Leave no room for doubt in the mind. #Leave no room for doubt in the mind.
#Never delay attending satsang. #Never delay attending satsang.
#Always have faith in God. #Always have faith in God.


In the United States, the early years of the Divine Light Mission were marked by the rapid growth of loosely affiliated local ashrams, united mainly by a shared devotion to Guru Maharaj Ji. As the DLM became more and more structured and centralized, leadership and power came to be concentrated in the Denver headquarters. According to scholars, Prem Rawat's desire to consolidate his power and authority over the U.S. movement led to increasing formalization, with rules and regulations for ashram living, standards for recruited "candidates," and pressure towards certification of the movement's teachers.<ref>McGuire, Meredith B. "Religion: the Social Context" fifth edition (2002) ISBN 0-534-54126-7 Chapter. 5 "The Dynamics of Religious Collectivities", section “How Religious Collectivities Develop and Change’’, sub-section "Organizational Transformations" p. 175 In the United States, the early years of the Divine Light Mission were marked by the rapid growth of loosely affiliated local ashrams, united mainly by a shared devotion to Guru Maharaj Ji. As the DLM became more and more structured and centralized, leadership and power came to be concentrated in the Denver headquarters. According to scholars, Prem Rawat's desire to consolidate his power and authority over the U.S. movement led to increasing formalization, with rules and regulations for ashram living, standards for recruited "candidates," and pressure towards certification of the movement's teachers.<ref name="Pilarzyk 1978"/><ref>Meredith (2002), p. 175</ref> According to scholars Foss and van der Lans, the teachings of Hans Ji Maharaj were minimized after 1975, and followers were expected to accept Prem Rawat as their personal savior.<ref>Foss & van der Lans in Barker (1983), p. 305</ref>
"As Weber pointed out, the long-term impact of a movement hinges on transformation of bases of authority and leadership from a charismatic mode to either traditional or legal-traditional rational structures. When a movement becomes established, there is a strong tendency for the organization to calcify around the memory of the early dynamism; its own tradition becomes the rationalization for why things should be done in a certain way.


] noted that the DLM movement was often criticized for emphasizing the superiority of subjective emotional experience over intellect.<ref>Barrett (2003), p. 65</ref> The sociologists ] and Daniel A. Foss made similar observations in 1978.<ref name="Foss & Larkin 1978"/> In response, the religious scholar ], himself a member of the movement, accused Foss and Larkin of bias.<ref>Geaves (2004), p. 45-62</ref>
Early stages of a movement's organization involve simple structures such as the charismatic leader and followers or leader, core followers, and other followers. The transition to legal-rational structures is typically accompanied by the elaboration and standardization of procedures, the emergence of specialized statuses and roles, and the formalizing of communication among members. The early years of the Divine Light Mission in the United States were characterized by rapidly growing, loosely affiliated local ashrams (i.e., groups of devotees, usually living communally), united mainly by the devotion to the ambiguous charismatic figure of Guru Maharaj Ji. As the DLM became increasingly structured and centralized, leadership and power focused in the Denver headquarters. The guru's desire to consolidate his power and authority over the movement in the United States resulted in greater formalization: rules and regulations for ashram living, standards for recruited "candidates", and pressure toward certifying the movement's teachers."</ref><ref>Thomas Pilarzyk ‘’The Origin, Development, and Decline of a Youth Culture Religion: An Application of the Sectarianization Theory’’ in "Review of Religious Research" 20, 1:33-37, 1978) Like some of its youth culture counterparts, the Divine Light Mission movement experienced rapid growth from its inception in the United States in 1971. By the summer of 1974, the American movement had grown to a total of 27 ashrams which housed over 1200 of an estimated 50,000 members or "premies." However, its development was not as simple, gradual, consistent, nor as long-lasting as changes within other "Eastern imports" such as the Hare Krsna movement. By July of 1972, the first national conference of DLM leaders took place, and guidelines were laid down which specified certain rules and regulations for U.S. ashrams. DLM officials note that this led to an initial departure of followers who viewed ashram life more as an economic convenience than as a step toward the enhancement of the spiritual path to God-realization. </ref>


A 1981 article based on the Dutch branch of the Divine Light Mission, stated that the DLM had little philosophical background and that all its central creeds and tenets were described in the song associated with the Hindu ritual called ].<ref>Haan in Kranenborg (1981) pp.55-57</ref> Arti was sung to Prem Rawat in the morning and evening in ashrams.<ref>] "The Guru: Perceptions of American Devotees of the Divine Light Mission", '']'' 7/1 (1980), 69-81</ref>
] noted that the DLM movement was often criticized for emphasizing the superiority of subjective emotional experience over intellect.<ref>Barrett, David V., The New Believers: A Survey of Sects, Cults and Alternative Religions (2003), Cassel, ISBN 1-84403-040-7 Page 65</ref> The sociologists ] and Daniel A. Foss made similar observations in 1978.<ref>Foss & Larkin.Worshipping the Absurd 'The Negation of Social Causality among the Followers of Guru Maharaj Ji.' Article by Daniel Foss and Larkin in Sociological Analysis, 1978.</ref> In response, the religious scholar ], himself a member of the movement, accused Foss and Larkin of bias.<ref>Geaves, ''From Divine Light Mission to Elan Vital and Beyond'', 2004: 45-62</ref>


Rawat says he does not charge for teaching people the techniques of Knowledge.<ref>'']'', p. 229</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://thekeys.maharaji.net/home/index.php?_a=knowledgebase&_j=questiondetails&_i=392 |title=The Keys, by Maharaji – "Is there a charge for viewing the Keys and receiving Knowledge?" | access-date=2008-11-20}}</ref> Related organizations that support the dissemination of Rawat's message are funded by donations.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://tprf.org/events/nam08/den0908/ |title=Maharaji in North America }}</ref> According to the Prem Rawat Foundation, it is supported by people who appreciate Rawat's message and wish to help make it available to others.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tprf.org/faqs.htm |title=FAQ }}</ref>
A 1981 article based on the Dutch branch of the Divine Light Mission stated that the DLM hardly had any philosophy background and that the all its central creeds and tenets were described in the song associated with the Hindu ritual called ]<ref>Haan, Wim '''' in the the series ''Religieuze bewegingen in Nederland: Feiten en Visies''/''Religious movements in the Netherlands: facts and opinions'' nr. 3, herfst 1981, edited by Dr. R. Bakker, Dr. C. J. G. van der Burg, ], Dr. ], and Dr. H. C. Stoffels. ISBN 90-242-2341-5 (Mainly based on the Dutch branch of the Divine Light Missionh, pp.55-57 contains the text of the ] song in English. Note: Haan described himself as a member of a critical movement with the Catholic Church at the moment that he wrote this article. </ref>


==Members== ==Members==
In a comparison of new religious movements, Gartrell and Shannon noted that people appeared to seek out such religious organizations to get answers to questions about ultimate meaning as well as answers to more prosaic issues. In discussing the differences in recruiting tactics employed by these groups, they placed the Divine Light Mission in the middle ground between movements in which recruits were ], or overwhelmed by waves of intense sentiment, and those in which affective bonds were discouraged. They reported that close ties between newcomers and DLM members developed gradually over a period of three to four months, between initial contact and their attending a "Knowledge session", and the emergent friendships were an important forum in which recruits aired doubts and discussed DLM beliefs. These relationships thus supplemented a very cognitive conversion process, in which active consideration of the movement's ideas and beliefs was encouraged from the outset. They found little evidence to suggest that social rewards were orchestrated by the movement, either in degree or timing.<ref>Gartrell and Shannon, 1985: 35</ref> In a comparison of new religious movements, Gartrell and Shannon noted that people appeared to seek out such religious organizations to get answers to questions about ultimate meaning as well as answers to more prosaic issues. In discussing the differences in recruiting tactics employed by these groups, they placed the Divine Light Mission in the middle ground between movements in which recruits were ], or overwhelmed by waves of intense sentiment, and those in which affective bonds were discouraged. They reported that close ties between newcomers and DLM members developed gradually over a period of three to four months, between initial contact and their attending a "Knowledge session", and the emergent friendships were an important forum in which recruits aired doubts and discussed DLM beliefs. These relationships thus supplemented a very cognitive conversion process, in which active consideration of the movement's ideas and beliefs was encouraged from the outset. They found little evidence to suggest that social rewards were orchestrated by the movement, either in degree or timing.<ref>Gartrell & Shannon (1985), p. 35</ref>


The sociologist ], who studied the DLM for five years, reported that the "idealism of these premies was one of the motivating forces behind their conversion . They wanted to create a more caring world".<ref> ] "]" Columbia Univ Press (July 1979) ISBN 0231041985 Chapter 6: Growing Up/Uncaring Institutions page 87</ref> Five years after the subjects of his study became premies he wrote: The sociologist ], who studied the DLM for five years, reported that the "idealism of these premies was one of the motivating forces behind their conversion . They wanted to create a more caring world".<ref>Downton (1979), p. 87</ref> Five years after the subjects of his study became premies he wrote:
<blockquote>"There is little doubt in my mind that these premies have changed in a positive way. Today, they seem less alienated, aimless, worried, afraid, and more peaceful, loving, confident, and appreciative of life. We could attribute these changes to surrender, devotion, and their involvement in the premie community. Each of these undoubtedly had a positive impact, but, if we accept what premies say, none were as critical as their experience of the universal spirit. Meditating on the life-energy for five years, they report having more positive attitudes about themselves."<ref> ] "]" Columbia Univ Press (July 1979) ISBN 0231041985 Chapter 12: Changes Page 210</ref></blockquote> <blockquote>"There is little doubt in my mind that these premies have changed in a positive way. Today, they seem less alienated, aimless, worried, afraid, and more peaceful, loving, confident, and appreciative of life. We could attribute these changes to surrender, devotion, and their involvement in the premie community. Each of these undoubtedly had a positive impact, but, if we accept what premies say, none were as critical as their experience of the universal spirit. Meditating on the life-energy for five years, they report having more positive attitudes about themselves."<ref>Downton (1979), p. 210</ref></blockquote>

According to Carroll Stoner and Jo Anne Parke, when they visited an ashram the premies "appeared to be in control of their own lives and seemed to be achieving some measure of peace as a by-product of a lifestyle they feel is constructive and healthy". When the same members attended an appearance by Prem Rawat a week later, "they lost control, sobbed and swayed and knelt to kiss his feet."<ref name="autogenerated10"/>

According to Foss and van der Lans, members who joined before 1975 tended to be young people from the counterculture who had used psychedelic drugs. Later members, they asserted, were older and more responsible with ordinary jobs who were disillusioned with conventional religions or other Eastern movements.<ref>Foss & van der Lans in Barker (1983), pp. 304-306</ref>

A study of ] carried out by ] in 1974, based on questionnaire responses given by 119 DLM members randomly chosen from festival registration lines, found that after two years involvement with DLM, members reported a considerable decline in psychological distress and drug use compared to their pre membership status. The study found that 45% of those surveyed had used marijuana daily before joining, while only 7% did so at the time of the study. Seventy-one percent reported psychological stress before joining compared to 37% at the time of the study. Overall, 38% had sought professional help for psychological problems before joining. These observations led to what Galanter's describes as "an apparent overall improvement in psychiatric state derived from conversion and its retention through continued membership", and that members, whether they were seriously distressed or not before joining, reported an improved emotional state after joining. Galanter reports that 82% of members surveyed were single, 97% were white, and 73% were in their twenties. The percentage of these with ] or ] backgrounds mirrored the general population, while there were ten times as many members with ] backgrounds as in the general population (21% versus 2%). Three-quarters of them had attended college.<ref name="isbn0-19-512370-0">Galanter (1999)</ref>
] conducted a comparative study of 41 DLM members from three US cities, 29 members of the ] movement and 40 college students. Among the DLM members the average age was 23 and ranged from 19 to 29. They came from middle-class backgrounds, all were white and had attended an average of 1.5 years of college, similar to the Hare Krishna sample, though DLM members were less likely to have come from broken homes. Sixty-five percent of DLM members reported having religious experiences while tripping on ]. Overall, 95% of DLM members had used psychedelic drugs, compared to 89% of Hare Krishna and 67% of the college student cohort. Compared to the college students, fewer DLM members had had religious upbringings and they tended to have had worse family experiences though only 17% came from "broken homes".<ref>Downton (1979), pp 228-230</ref>

One member, writing in the 1970s said that followers were "nagged to donate funds of their own" and some devotees signed pledges to donate a dollar a day to provide the Mission with some reliable income.<ref name="Messer, 1976"/> One former accountant for the DLM said that new followers were asked to turn over their entire savings, sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars, and in several cases their families contested the donations. He was quoted as saying "it takes a lot of money to keep a guru." Bob Mishler, the mission's executive director, talked one person into signing over power of attorney shortly after she joined. Mishler was sacked by Rawat in 1976.<ref>{{cite news|title=Growing Pile of Unpaid Bills Beneath Guru's Spiritual Bliss|first=Deborah| last=Frazier| agency=United Press International|date=23 March 1975|work=Sunday Journal and Star|location=Lincoln, Nebraska|page=11A}}</ref><ref>Price, Maeve (1979): The Divine Light Mission as a social organization. (1) Sociological Review, 27, Page 279-296</ref>


==Ashrams== ==Ashrams==
The Divine Light Mission began creating ashrams in India in the 1960s, starting with a small one in ] and a larger one called Satlok ("Place of Truth") between ] and ]. <ref>''Hans Jayanti'' (2000), pp.24-37. DUO, New Delhi, Book published in commemoration of the 100th anniversary of Hans Ji Maharaj's birth by Prem Rawat's Indian organization. </ref>


=== In India ===
Soon after the Divine Light Mission expanded to the West, several dozen ashrams were formed in the US, Britain, Europe and Australia. Followers ("premies") who lived in them often worked part or full time at ordinary jobs and gave a sizable portion – sometimes all – of their income to the movement. In the ashrams they practiced celibacy, vegetarianism, and frequent meditation.<ref><small> All Mission activities depend entirely on volunteered labor and funds. The knowledge itself, the primary source of satisfaction to devotees, is independent of the Mission proper, and DLM has no power to discipline or enforce agreements. Devotees move in and out of service roles or financial commitments, and DLM has little chance to predict or control income or staffing.''</small> Messer, Jeanne 'Guru Maharaj Ji and the Divine Light Mission,'' in ''The New Religious Consciousness'' edited by ] and ], Berkeley: University of California Press. pp.52-72. ISBN 0-52003-472-4</ref><ref><small>Premies could live in ashrams to devote themselves more fully to Service. Premies often worked part or full time outside the ashram and gave a sizable portion-sometimes all-of their income to the movement. They also practiced celibacy, vegetarianism, and frequent meditation. The focus of this ascetic existence was their religious mission rather than personal pleasure or gain.</small>{{cite book |author=Galanter, Marc |title=Cults: faith, healing, and coercion |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |year=1999 |pages= |isbn=0-19-512370-0 |oclc= |doi=}}</ref><ref><small>Many of the characteristics of the Indian movement founded by Prem Rawat’s father, who had died only in 1966, were imported wholesale into the western environment. Ashrams were established with a lifetime commitment of celibacy expected from those who joined. Members were expected to forswear drugs and alcohol, and adopt a strict vegetarian diet. The closing of the ashrams took away the possibility of a committed workforce and instead Prem Rawat’s activities to promote his teachings became more dependent on part-time volunteer assistance from individuals who were now raising families and creating careers for themselves.</small> Geaves, Ron, Globalization, Charisma, Innovation and Tradition: An exploration of the transformations in the organisational vehicles for the transmission of the teachings of Prem Rawat (Maharaji), 2006, Journal of Alternative Spiritualities and New Age Studies, 2 44-62</ref> The ashram premies became the core of the Mission in the United States, but the ashrams themselves were not a source of income, never becoming more than self-sufficient.<ref><small>Many were initiated and became the core of the Mission in the United States. Headquarters were established in Denver, and by the end of 1973, tens of thousands had been initiated, and several hundred centers as well as over twenty ashrams, which housed approximately 500 of the most dedicated premies, had emerged.</small> J. Gordon Melton ''Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America'' New York/London: Garland, 1986; revised edition, Garland, pages 141-145</ref><ref><small> While the ashrams have often been self-supporting they have not been a good source of income for the Mission. Unlike the Moonies, the Children of God, or the Hare Krishnas, Divine Light Mission members do not sell anything. They do not solicit on street corners, selling candy, flowers, peanuts, or literature. And unlike the Church of Scientology, Guru Maharaj Ji's group does not charge for the courses or the teaching of the techniques of "knowledge." The group gets its money through gifts and the tithing of its members. The more gainfully employed a premie is, the higher the tithe the Mission receives.</small></ref><ref name="isbn0-8019-6620-5">{{cite book |author=Parke, Jo Anne; Stoner, Carroll |title=All gods children: the cult experience--salvation or slavery? |publisher=Chilton |location=Radnor, Pa |year=1977 |pages= |isbn=0-8019-6620-5 |oclc= |doi=}}</ref><ref><small>Like some of its youth culture counterparts, the Divine Light Mission movement experienced rapid growth from its inception in the United States in 1971. By the summer of 1974, the American movement had grown to a total of 27 ashrams which housed over 1200 of an estimated 50,000 members or "premies." However, its development was not as simple, gradual, consistent, nor as long-lasting as changes within other "Eastern imports" such as the Hare Krsna movement. By July of 1972, the first national conference of DLM leaders took place, and guidelines were laid down which specified certain rules and regulations for U.S. ashrams. DLM officials note that this led to an initial departure of followers who viewed ashram life more as an economic convenience than as a step toward the enhancement of the spiritual path to God-realization.</small> Pilarzyk, Thomas, ''The Origin, Development, and Decline of a Youth Culture Religion: An Application of Sectarianization Theory Review of Religious Research, Vol. 20, No. 1 (Autumn, 1978), pp. 23-43</ref><ref><small>From the small beginning of one mahatma in London and a handful of premies, the mission grew, with up to half a dozen mahatmas at any one time giving knowledge, the establishment of Divine Information Centres in most major towns and cities and the setting up of about forty ashrams (designated premie households) throughout Britain by the end of 1973. Ashrams played an important part in the mission's structure. Here premies had chosen to live in small communal households, under vows of poverty, chastity and obedience. In practice they were under the direct supervision of head office and acted as cadres for the whole movement. A large membership had grown up very rapidly but the organizers had no clear idea where to lead the following, nor did they have the financial resources to maintain so many full-time workers. The ashrams which should have provided a sound financial basis for the mission's operations were not even self-financing and had to be supported from funds.</small> Price, Maeve (1979): The Divine Light Mission as a social organization. Sociological Review, 27, Page 279-296</ref>
The Divine Light Mission began creating ashrams in India in the 1960s, starting with a small one in ] and a larger one called Satlok ("Place of Truth") between ] and ].<ref>''Hans Jayanti'' (2000), pp.24-37. DUO, New Delhi, Book published in commemoration of the 100th anniversary of Hans Ji Maharaj's birth by Prem Rawat's Indian organization.</ref> ], who visited the Mission's headquarters in Delhi in 1973 described it as being like a fortress with {{convert|8|ft|m|adj=on}}-high walls, an iron grilled gate enclosing a courtyard and a complex of buildings capable of housing 100 and with the capacity to feed 50,000 visitors on special occasions. Singh also described "the lavish use of marble, wall-to-wall carpets, chandeliers and modern furnishings" as evidence of affluence.<ref>{{cite news | title = The Guru Business | author = ] | work = The New York Times| date = 8 April 1973 | url = http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F00D11F83F5C147A93CAA9178FD85F478785F9 }}</ref>


=== In the West ===
Carroll Stoner and Jo Anne Parke, in their 1977 book, ], wrote of their visits to several ashrams that -
Only a small fraction of the overall DLM membership lived in organized ashrams during its short history but several dozen ashrams were formed in the U.S., Britain, Europe and Australia. Ashrams were run by "general secretaries" appointed by the national office.<ref name="Pilarzyk 1978"/><ref>Messer in Glock & Bellah (1976), p. 64</ref> Each ashram had a "house mother" who oversaw cooking, washing, ironing, and food service but the normal isolation of the housewife and cook became a communal, everyone-pitchin-and-help festival.<ref name=autogenerated12 /><ref name=autogenerated10 /><ref name="Geaves2006" /><ref name="Messer in Glock & Bellah 1976"/><ref name="isbn0-19-512370-0"/>
Followers ("premies") who lived in them often worked part or full time at ordinary jobs and gave a sizable portion – sometimes all – of their income to the movement. Ashrams typically had an associated business, such as a Divine Sales outlet and a Divine Service Company.<ref name=autogenerated8>Messer in Glock & Bellah (1976), p. 65</ref> The ashram premies became the core of the Mission in the United States, but the ashrams themselves were not a source of income, never becoming more than self-sufficient.<ref name="Price 1979"/><ref name="autogenerated10"/><ref name="Pilarzyk 1978"/><ref>Melton (1986)</ref> Followers wishing to stay in the ]s established by Rawat were required to fill out detailed applications that focused on their trust funds, insurance policies, and other assets.<ref>{{cite news|title=The guru who minds his mother|first=Malcom N. |last=Carter|page=A6|work= The Stars and Stripes|date=4 November 1973|agency=Associated Press}}</ref>


In Australia in the early 1970s, a small percentage of premies lived in ashrams. Some premies choose to live in an ashram for a couple of months, to get into their meditation, and then moved out into households or shared houses. Ashram rules demanded celibacy and abstinence from meat, alcohol, cigarettes and drugs. Married people, as well as single, lived in ashrams and, in their case, the practice of celibacy meant that they had sexual relations only with their marital partner. About three hundred people chose to live in communal houses and almost all households were non-smoking, non-drinking and vegetarian and, in some, the finances and energies were pooled for the good of all. Each household made its own decisions about life styles and often contained students and married couples.<ref>Harper, Derek & Michael McDonald in Smith & Crossley (1975)</ref>
<blockquote>"There was no persuasion or cajoling for us to become part of this group. We did feel a sense of calm and peace in the ashrams. Most of the premies seemed sincere and rational. They appeared to be in control of their own lives and seemed to be achieving some measure of peace as a by-product of a lifestyle they feel is constructive and healthy.<ref>Carroll Stoner and Jo Anne Parke,All God's Children,Chilton Book Co ISBN 0801966205,During the visit and on previous occasions when we visited ashrams as undeclared aspirants, there was no persuasion or cajoling for us to become part of this group. We did feel a sense of calm and peace in the ashrams. Most of the premies seemed sincere and rational. They appeared to be in control of their own lives and seemed to be achieving some measure of peace as a by-product of a lifestyle they feel is constructive and healthy."</ref></blockquote>


In addition to the ashrams, there were many more residences with less formality. "Premie Centers", were households committed to the Mission's activity that donated 30% of their income and followed dietary rules, but that allowed married, non-celibate couples and children, and which weren't subject to orders from the national Mission. "Premie houses" were informal households (with as many as 30 followers) held together by their shared commitments and values. Ashrams served as local coordinating centers for all the local devotees.<ref name=autogenerated8 />
], in his 1990 book, ], wrote of his visit to a DLM ashram that –


<blockquote> "The atmosphere in the ashram was indeed quite striking.&nbsp;... I was greeted in a friendly, even intimate fashion by people who were complete strangers. The intense communality of the members was immediately apparent, a quality that was clearly an important aspect of the group's function. One could sense a closeness among those present, and an absence of the minor tensions that would be expected in a setting where two dozen people were living in tight quarters.&nbsp;... Caring and intimacy, reflective of the group's cohesiveness, seemed to mute any expression of animosity.&nbsp;... I was made to feel as if I were entering a supportive envelope, to be protected from the rough edges of relationships in the outside world.<ref>Marc Galanter, Cults: Faith, Healing and Coercion, Oxford University Press (1999) ISBN 0-19-512370-0 Initial Encounters, p. 25</ref></blockquote> Carroll Stoner and Jo Anne Parke wrote in 1977 of their visits to several ashrams that "there was no persuasion or cajoling for us to become part of this group. We did feel a sense of calm and peace in the ashrams.<ref>Stoner & Parker (1977)</ref> ], wrote in 1989 of his visit to a DLM ashram that —
<blockquote> "The atmosphere in the ashram was indeed quite striking.&nbsp;... I was greeted in a friendly, even intimate fashion by people who were complete strangers. The intense communality of the members was immediately apparent, a quality that was clearly an important aspect of the group's function. One could sense a closeness among those present, and an absence of the minor tensions that would be expected in a setting where two dozen people were living in tight quarters.&nbsp;... Caring and intimacy, reflective of the group's cohesiveness, seemed to mute any expression of animosity.&nbsp;... I was made to feel as if I were entering a supportive envelope, to be protected from the rough edges of relationships in the outside world.<ref>Galanter (1999), p. 25</ref></blockquote>


==Reception== ==Reception==


The Divine Light Mission has been described in various and sometimes conflicting terms. It has been called a ],<ref>Hunt, 2003: 116; Derks and van der Lans ''Of Gods and Men'' 1983: 303; Wilson, ''Social Dimensions of Sectarism'', 1990: 209</ref> a ],<ref>Beckford, ''Of Gods and Men'' 1983: 195; Langone, 1995 :41</ref> a charismatic ],<ref name=galanter1999>Galanter, 1999: 19</ref> an offshoot of ],<ref>Lewis, 2004: 24; Edwards, 2001 :227</ref> an alternative religion or spin-off from other traditional religions,<ref>Guiley, 1991: 152; >Barret, 1996</ref> a ] offshoot,<ref>Miller, 474: 364; Juergensmeyer, 1991 :207</ref> an orthodox ] community,<ref>Sutton, 2005 :44</ref> an ] related tradition,<ref>Geaves, 2002</ref> as a founded, proselytizing religion ("Guru-ism"),<ref>Axel Michaels, Barbara Harshav. ''Hinduism: Past and Present.'' 2004 Princeton University Press, p. 23. ISBN 0691089523</ref> and a defunct religious movement.<ref>Olson, Roger E., in Miller 1995: 364</ref> A study of terms used in U.S. newspapers and news magazines, which examined the media's failure to use the more neutral terminology favored by social scientists, found that the Divine Light Mission was referred to as a "sect" in 10.3% of articles, as a "cult" in 24.1%, and as both in 13.8%. It was referred to as a "sect" in 21.4% of headlines, with 0% for "cult".<ref>van Driel, Barend and James T. Richardson. "Research Note Categorization of New Religious Movements in American Print Media". Sociological Analysis 1988, 49, 2:171-183</ref> The Divine Light Mission was described in various and sometimes conflicting terms. It was called a ],<ref>Hunt (2003), p. 116; Derks and van der Lans (1983), p. 303; Wilson (1990), p. 209</ref> a ],<ref>Beckford (1983), p. 195; Langone (1995), p. 41</ref> a charismatic ],<ref name=galanter1999>Galanter (1999), p. 19</ref> an offshoot of ],<ref>Lewis (2004), p. 24; Edwards (2001), p. 227</ref> an alternative religion or spin-off from other traditional religions,<ref>Guiley (1991), p. 152; Barret (1996)</ref> a youth religion,<ref name=Seiwert>Seiwert, H. (2004), "The German Enquete Commission: Political Conflicts and Compromises", in Richardson, James T. (ed.) (2004), ''Regulating Religion: Case Studies from Around the Globe'', New York, NY: Luwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, {{ISBN|978-0-306-47887-1}}, p. 86</ref> a ] offshoot,<ref>Miller (1995), pp. 474, 364; Juergensmeyer (1991), p. 207</ref> an orthodox ] community,<ref>Sutton (2005), p. 44</ref> an ] related tradition,<ref>Geaves (2002)</ref> a proselytizing religion ("Guru-ism"),<ref>Axel & Harshav (2004), p. 23</ref> and a defunct religious movement.<ref>Olson, Roger E., in Miller (1995), p. 364</ref> A study of terms used in U.S. newspapers and news magazines, which examined the media's failure to use the more neutral terminology favored by social scientists, found that the Divine Light Mission was referred to as a "sect" in 10.3% of articles, as a "cult" in 24.1%, and as both in 13.8%. It was referred to as a "sect" in 21.4% of headlines, with 0% for "cult".<ref>van Driel & Richardson (1988)</ref>

The president and spokesman of the DLM said in 1977 that "they represent a church rather than a religion".<ref>"Miami's startled elite wish the guru, in short, a pleasant stay", By Barry Bearak, Knight-Ridder Service, 30 July 1977. ''Independent Press Telegram'' (Long Beach, CA) A-11</ref>

In some countries, the DLM faced persecution and even banning. In 1972, in ], as part of a crackdown on small religious groups by the ], 87 members of the DLM were arrested in ] on charges of using drugs and practising their faith. The DLM, the Hare Krishnas and the Jehovah's Witnesses were banned, reportedly at the behest of the Roman Catholic Church.<ref>Ferrara, Grace, M., ''Latin America – 1978, Facts on File''.</ref><ref>Gill (1998), p. 168</ref> The ] arrested over 200 members, including 12 foreigners, in 1974.<ref>"Five sect leaders in Chile sent to desert prison camp.", Jonathan Kandell, New York Times, 24 March 1974</ref> The Jehovah's Witnesses and DLM were also banned by ] authorities.<ref>Mauzy (2002), p. 132</ref>

Bromley and Hammond described the Divine Light Mission as belonging in a "medium tension category", among movements that were seen by the public as peculiar rather than threatening, and to which society responded with watchfulness and ostracism.<ref name="isbn0-865-54238-4"/> ] ] wrote that the DLM, along with other groups such as the ], was widely held in low esteem – families felt their children were being financially exploited while the groups' leaders lived in "ostentation and offensive opulence."<ref>Levine (1989), pp. 96, 102</ref>

Ron Geaves states that the Divine Light Mission "developed into a vigorous new religious movement with its own specific traits that included characteristics of a contemporary North Indian ] panth (sectarian institution) and ] ] was combined with intense reverence for the living ] and ] expectations of the western ]."<ref name="Geaves2006" />


According to sociologist Pilarzyk the youth culture response – mainly from a decidedly leftist political perspective – was somewhat ambiguous, combining indifference with some instances of overt hostility. Pilarzyk mentioned that these criticisms usually focused on the perceived phoniness of the "blissed-out premies", the "hocuspocus" aspects of the meditation, and the "materialistic fixations" and physical condition of the guru. These accounts are described by Pilarzyk as being quite negative and full of distortions from the DLM's adherents point of view and drawing responses from them that varied from bewilderment and amusement to extreme defensiveness. Positive comments came from youth culture "folk heroes" such as anti-war activist Rev. ], radical lawyer ], and singer-songwriter ].<ref name="Pilarzyk1978">Pilarzyk, Thomas. "The Origin, Development, and Decline of a Youth Culture Religion: An Application of Sectarianization Theory" in ''Review of Religious Research''. Fall 1978, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 23-43. </ref>
The group called itself a "church not a religion".<ref>"Miami's startled elite wish the
guru, in short, a pleasant stay", By Barry Bearak, Knight-Ridder Service, July 30, 1977. ''INDEPENDENT PRESS TELEGRAM'' (Long Beach, CA) A-11 "ACCORDING to Anctil and mission president Bill Patterson, they represent a church rather than a religion."</ref>


Summarizing his 1985 review of studies of a number of new religious movements, such as ], the ], the ] group in Europe and the Divine Light Mission, ] stated that "life in the new religions is often therapeutic instead of harmful", and suggested that the young people attracted to these movements were affirming their idealism by their involvement. Richardson asserted that his review found there was little data to support the almost completely negative picture of these groups painted by a few mental health professionals and others.<ref>Richardson (1995), p. 147</ref>
Bromley and Hammond describe the Divine Light Mission as belonging in a "medium tension category", defined as movements that were seen by the public as peculiar rather than threatening and to which society responded with watchfulnes and ostracism.<ref name="isbn0-865-54238-4">Bromley, Hammond, 1983: 113-4, 227</ref> ] ] wrote that the DLM, along with other groups such as the ], was widely held in low esteem – families felt their children were being financially exploited, while the groups' leaders lived in "ostentation and offensive opulence."<ref>Levine, 1989: 96, 102</ref>


==Notable members==
Summarizing his 1985 review of studies of a number of new religious movements, such as ], the ], the ] group in Europe and the Divine Light Mission, ] stated that "life in the new religions is often therapeutic instead of harmful", and that other information would suggest that the young people attracted to these movements were affirming their idealism by their involvement. Richardson asserted that his review found there was little data to support the almost completely negative picture of these groups painted by a few mental health professionals and others.<ref>Richardson, 1995: 147</ref>
*]<ref>"The Mail man, the Maharaji and the exploding love-bomb: Francis Wheen on: Divine intervention at the Daily Mail." Francis Wheen, ''The Guardian'' London, England, 14 July 1999</ref>
*]<ref name="Collier 1978"/>
*]<ref name="Kent 2001, p. 52"/>
*]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mindyourownmusic.co.uk/paul-dunmall-interview.htm| title=Paul Dunmall interview| work=Mind Your Own Music|access-date=2 February 2009}}</ref>
*]<ref>du Plessix Gray, Francine, "Blissing Out in Houston", ''New York Review of Books'', 13 December 1973</ref>
*]
*]
*]<ref>Gillmore brings intellect, idealism to country music", DAVID FRICKE ''Rolling Stone Magazine'', reprinted in the ''Daily Herald'' 10 March 1994</ref>
*]<ref>"Chess", by Richard Shorman ''Hayward Daily Review'', 7 October 1973</ref>
*]<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090606020014/http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid:244698 |date=6 June 2009 }}, MARGARET MOSER, ''Austin Chronicle'' 31 DECEMBER 2004</ref>
*]<ref>Sadie & Rhian (1995)</ref>
*]<ref>"Rodgers Follows Guru", ], ''Winnipeg Free Press'', Friday, 23 January 1976</ref>


==See also==
Ron Geaves states that the Divine Light Mission
*]
<blockquote>...developed into a vigorous new religious movement with its own specific traits that included characteristics of a contemporary North Indian ] panth (sectarian institution) and ] ] was combined with intense reverence for the living ] and ] expectations of the western ].<ref>Geaves, Ron, "Globalization, charisma, innovation, and tradition: An exploration of the transformations in the organisational vehicles for the transmission of the teachings of Prem Rawat (Maharaji)", 2006, ''Journal of Alternative Spiritualities and New Age Studies'', 2 44-62 </ref></blockquote>
*]


==Footnotes== ==Footnotes==
{{reflist|2}} {{Reflist}}


==References== ==References==
{{refbegin|2}}
* {{cite book |author=Barbour, John D. |title=Versions of deconversion : autobiography and the loss of faith |publisher=University Press of Virginia |location=Charlottesville |year=1994 |pages= |isbn=9780813915463 |oclc=30355348 |doi=}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Algora Pub. |isbn = 978-1-892941-10-7 |last = Abgrall |first = Jean-Marie | author-link = Jean-Marie Abgrall|author2=NetLibrary, Inc. |title = Soul snatchers the mechanics of cults |url = https://archive.org/details/soulsnatchersmec0000abgr |url-access = registration |location = New York |year = 2000}}
* ] (1989), ''New Religious Movements: A Practical Introduction'', London, HMSO
*{{Cite book|publisher = Henry Regnery|isbn = 978-0-8092-8407-8|last = Bancroft|first = Anne|title = Twentieth Century Mystics and Sages|location = Chicago|year = 1976|url-access = registration|url = https://archive.org/details/twentiethcentury0000banc}} (See pages 136-147.)
* {{cite book |author=Barrett, David V. |title=Sects, cults, and alternative religions: a world survey and sourcebook |publisher=Blandford |location=London |year=1996 |pages= |isbn=0-7137-2567-2 |oclc= |doi=}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = University Press of Virginia |isbn = 978-0-8139-1546-3 |last = Barbour |first = John D. |title = Versions of deconversion : autobiography and the loss of faith |location = Charlottesville |year = 1994}}
* {{cite book |author=Barrett, David V. |title=The New Believers: Sects, 'Cults' and Alternative Religions |publisher=Cassell |location=London |year=2003 |pages= |isbn=1-84403-040-7 |oclc= |doi=}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Mercer University Press |isbn = 978-0-86554-095-8 |last = Barker |first = Eileen |author-link = Eileen Barker |author2 = British Sociological Association. |title = Of gods and men : new religious movements in the West : proceedings of the 1981 Annual Conference of the British Sociological Association, Sociology of Religion Study Group |location = Macon GA |year = 1983 |url-access = registration |url = https://archive.org/details/unset0000unse_m4v9 }}
* {{cite book |author=Beckford, James A. |title=New religious movements and rapid social change |publisher=Sage Publications |location=Thousand Oaks |year=1986 |pages= |isbn=0-8039-8003-5 |oclc= |doi=}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = H.M.S.O. |isbn = 978-0-11-340927-3 |last = Barker |first = Eileen | author-link = Eileen Barker|author2=Great Britain. |title = New religious movements : a practical introduction |location = London |year = 1989}}
* {{cite book |author=Bromley, David G., Phillip E. Hammond |title=The Future of new religious movements |publisher=Mercer University Press |location=Macon, GA |year=1987 |pages= |isbn=0-86554-238-4 |oclc= |doi=}}
*{{Cite book|publisher = Blandford; Distributed in the United States by Sterling Pub. |isbn = 978-0-7137-2567-4 |last = Barrett |first = David V. |author-link = David V. Barrett |title = Sects, cults, and alternative religions : a world survey and sourcebook |location = London; New York |year = 1996 |url = https://archive.org/details/sectscultsaltern00barr }}
* {{cite book |author=Bromley, David G., Anson D. Shupe |title=Strange Gods: The Great American Cult Scare |publisher=Beacon Press |location=Boston |year=1981 |pages= |isbn=0-8070-3256-5 |oclc= |doi=}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Cassell; Distributed in the United States by Sterling Pub. |isbn = 978-0-304-35592-1 |last = Barrett |first = David V. | author-link = David V. Barrett |title = ] |location = London; New York, NY |year = 2001}}
*{{cite book |author=Chryssides, George D. |title=Historical dictionary of new religious movements |publisher=Scarecrow Press |location=Metuchen, N.J |year=2001 |pages= |isbn=0-8108-4095-2 |oclc= |doi=}}
*{{Cite book|publisher = Sage Publications;Unesco |isbn = 978-0-8039-8003-7 |last = Beckford |first = James |author2 = International Sociological Association. |title = New religious movements and rapid social change |location = London;Beverly Hills, Calif.;Paris, France |year = 1986 |url = https://archive.org/details/newreligiousmove00reli }}
*{{Cite book|publisher = Rosen Pub. Group |isbn = 978-0-8239-1505-7 |last = Beit-Hallahmi |first = Benjamin |author-link = Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi |title = The illustrated encyclopedia of active new religions, sects, and cults |location = New York |year = 1993 |url = https://archive.org/details/illustratedencyc00beit }}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Beacon Press |isbn = 978-0-8070-3256-5 |last = Bromley |first = David G. | author-link = David G. Bromley|author2=Anson D. Shupe |title = Strange gods : the great American cult scare |url = https://archive.org/details/strangegodsgreat00brom |url-access = registration |location = Boston |year = 1981}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Mercer University Press |isbn = 978-0-86554-237-2 |last = Bromley |first = David| author-link = David G. Bromley |author2 = New Ecumenical Research Association (Unification Theological Seminary), Phillip E. Hammond |title = The Future of new religious movements |location = Macon Ga. |year = 1987}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Bloomsbury |isbn = 978-1-58234-001-2
| last = Brown |first = Mick | author-link = Mick Brown (journalist) |title = The Spiritual Tourist: A Personal Odyssey Through the Outer Reaches of Belief|url = https://archive.org/details/spiritualtourist0000brow |url-access = registration |location = London |year = 1998}} (See pages 195-196.)
*{{Cite book |publisher = Mighty River Press |isbn = 978-0-9788694-9-6 |last = Cagan |first = Andrea| author-link = Andrea Cagan |title = Peace is possible : the life and message of Prem Rawat |location = Dresher, PA |year = 2006}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Scarecrow Press |isbn = 978-0-8108-4095-9 |last = Chryssides |first = George D. |author-link = George D. Chryssides |title = Historical dictionary of new religious movements |location = Lanham, Md. |series = Historical dictionaries of religions, philosophies, and movements, no. 42 |year = 2001 |url-access = registration |url = https://archive.org/details/historicaldictio0000chry }}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Routledge |isbn = 978-0-415-26707-6 | editor-last = Clarke |editor-first = Peter B| title = Encyclopedia of New Religious Movements |location = Abingdon & New York |year = 2006}} (See pages 167, 'Divine Light Mission' (Kim Knott), and 508, 'Radhasoami Movements', PierLuigi Zoccatelli.)
*{{Cite book |edition = 1st |publisher = Morrow |isbn = 978-0-688-03276-0 |last = Collier |first = Sophia| author-link = Sophia Collier |title = ] |location = New York |year = 1978}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Stillpoint Press |isbn = 978-0-9647650-0-9 |last = Conway |first = Flo | author-link = Flo Conway|author2=Jim. Siegelman |title = ]|location = New York |year = 1995}}
*Divine Light Mission, India (1970). ''Satgurudev Shri Hans Ji Maharaj: Eternal is He, Eternal is His Knowledge''. *Divine Light Mission, India (1970). ''Satgurudev Shri Hans Ji Maharaj: Eternal is He, Eternal is His Knowledge''.
*{{Cite book |publisher = ] |isbn = 978-0-231-04198-0 |last = Downton |first = James V. | author-link = James V. Downton|title = ] |location = New York |year = 1979}}
* {{cite book |author=Conway, Flo, Siegelman, Jim |title=Snapping: America's Epidemic of Sudden Personality Change |publisher=Stillpoint Press |location=NY, NY |year=1995 |pages= |isbn=0-9647650-0-4|oclc= |doi=}}
*{{Cite journal| issn = 0038-0210| volume = 47| issue = 2| pages = 111–124| last = DuPertuis| first = Lucy| title = How People Recognize Charisma: The Case of Darshan in Radhasoami and Divine Light Mission| journal = Sociological Analysis| year = 1986| jstor = 3711456| doi = 10.2307/3711456| publisher = Oxford University Press}}
* {{cite book |author=Downton, James V. |title=] |publisher=Columbia University Press |location=New York |year=1979 |pages= |isbn=0-231-04198-5 |oclc= |doi=}}
* {{cite book |author=Edwards, Linda |title=A brief guide to beliefs: ideas, theologies, mysteries, and movements |publisher=Westminster John Knox Press |location=Louisville, Ky |year=2001 |pages= |isbn=0-664-22259-5 |oclc= |doi=}} *{{Cite book|publisher = Westminster John Knox Press |isbn = 978-0-664-22259-8 |last = Edwards |first = Linda |title = A brief guide to beliefs : ideas, theologies, mysteries, and movements |location = Louisville |year = 2001 |url = https://archive.org/details/unset0000unse_s5t3 }}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Wm. B. Eerdmans Pub. |isbn = 978-0-8028-2413-4 |last = Fahlbusch |first = Erwin. |author2 = Geoffrey William. Bromiley |title = Eerdmans encyclopedia of Christianity |location = Grand Rapids, Mich. |year = 1998 |url-access = registration |url = https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofch0001unse_t6f2 }}
* Foss, Daniel, and Ralph Larkin. ''Worshipping the Absurd: The Negation of Social Causality Among the Followers of the Guru Maharaji'ji.'' Sociological Analysis, 39 (1978): 157-164.
*{{Cite book |publisher = Babbling Brook Press |isbn =978-1-4392-4504-0|
* Galanter, Marc M. D. (2002) ''Alcohol & Drug Abuse: Healing Through Social and Spiritual Affiliation'', Psychiatric Services 53:1072-1074, September 2002. American Psychiatric Association
last = Finch |first = Michael |title = Without the Guru. (How I took my life back after thirty years)|year = 2009}}
* Galanter M, Buckley P, Deutsch A, Rabkin R, Rabkin J (1980) ''Large group influence for decreased drug use: findings from two contemporary religious sects'' Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1980;7(3-4):291-304.
*{{Cite journal| issn = 0038-0210| volume = 39| issue = 2| pages = 157–164| last = Foss| first = Daniel A.| author-link = Daniel Foss|author2=Ralph W. Larkin| title = Worshiping the Absurd: The Negation of Social Causality among the Followers of Guru Maharaj Ji| journal = Sociological Analysis| date = Summer 1978| jstor = 3710215 |doi=10.2307/3710215| publisher = Oxford University Press}}
* {{cite book |author=Galanter, Marc |title=Cults: faith, healing, and coercion |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |year=1999 |pages= |isbn=0-19-512369-7 |oclc= |doi=}}
*{{Cite journal| doi = 10.3109/00952998008993428| issn = 0095-2990| volume = 7| issue = 3–4| pages = 291–304| last = Galanter| first = Marc| author-link = Marc Galanter (psychiatrist)|author2=P Buckley|author3=A Deutsch|author4=R Rabkin|author5=J Rabkin| title = Large group influence for decreased drug use: findings from two contemporary religious sects| journal = The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse| year = 1980| pmid = 7258164}}
* {{cite book |author=Galanter, Marc |title=Cults and new religious movements: a report of the American Psychiatric Association |publisher=The Association |location= |year=1989 |pages= |isbn=0-89042-212-5 |oclc= |doi=}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = ] |isbn = 978-0-19-512369-2 |last = Galanter |first = Marc| author-link = Marc Galanter (psychiatrist) |title = ] |location = New York |year = 1999}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = The Association |isbn = 978-0-89042-212-0 |last = Galanter |first = Marc | author-link = Marc Galanter (psychiatrist)|author2 = American Psychiatric Association. Committee on Psychiatry and Religion. |title = Cults and new religious movements : a report of the American Psychiatric Association |location = Washington, DC |year = 1989}}
*{{Cite journal| doi = 10.1176/appi.ps.53.9.1072| volume = 53| issue = 9| pages = 1072–1074| last = Galanter| first = Marc| author-link = Marc Galanter (psychiatrist)| title = Alcohol & Drug Abuse: Healing Through Social and Spiritual Affiliation| journal = Psychiatr Serv| access-date = 2008-10-14| date = 1 September 2002| url = http://ps.psychiatryonline.org| pmid = 12221303}}
* Gartrell, C. David and Shannon, Zane K., ''Contacts, Cognitions, and Conversion: a Rational Choice Approach'', Review of Religious Research, Vol. 27, 1985 * Gartrell, C. David and Shannon, Zane K., ''Contacts, Cognitions, and Conversion: a Rational Choice Approach'', Review of Religious Research, Vol. 27, 1985
* Geaves, Ron (2002), ''From Totapuri to Maharaji: Reflections on a Lineage (Parampara)'', paper delivered to the 27th Spalding Symposium on Indian Religions, Regents Park College, Oxford, 22–24 March 2002 * Geaves, Ron (2002), ''From Totapuri to Maharaji: Reflections on a Lineage (Parampara)'', paper delivered to the 27th Spalding Symposium on Indian Religions, Regents Park College, Oxford, 22–24 March 2002
* Geaves, Ron. ''From Divine Light Mission to Elan Vital and Beyond: An Exploration of Change and Adaptation'', Nova Religio, March 2004, Vol. 7, No. 3, Pages 45-62 *{{Cite journal| volume = 7| issue = 3| pages = 45–62| last = Geaves| first = Ron| author-link = Ron Geaves| title = From Divine Light Mission to Elan Vital and Beyond: An Exploration of Change and Adaptation| journal = Nova Religio| access-date = 2008-10-14| date = March 2004| url = http://caliber.ucpress.net/doi/abs/10.1525/nr.2004.7.3.45| doi = 10.1525/nr.2004.7.3.45| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110519001820/http://caliber.ucpress.net/doi/abs/10.1525/nr.2004.7.3.45| archive-date = 19 May 2011| url-status = dead}}
* Geaves, Ron, ''Globalization, charisma, innovation, and tradition: An exploration of the transformations in the organisational vehicles for the transmission of the teachings of Prem Rawat (Maharaji)'', 2006, Journal of Alternative Spiritualities and New Age Studies, 2 44-62 * Geaves, Ron. "Globalization, charisma, innovation, and tradition: An exploration of the transformations in the organisational vehicles for the transmission of the teachings of Prem Rawat (Maharaji)" in ''Journal of Alternative Spiritualities and New Age Studies – Volume 2'', 2006, {{ISBN|978-1-4196-2696-8}}, pp.&nbsp;44–62.
*{{Cite book |publisher = University of Chicago Press |isbn = 978-0-226-29383-7 |last = Gill |first = Anthony James |title = Rendering unto Caesar : the Catholic Church and the state in Latin America |location = Chicago, IL |year = 1998 |url-access = registration |url = https://archive.org/details/renderinguntocae0000gill }}
* {{cite book |author=Guiley, Rosemary |title=Harper's encyclopedia of mystical & paranormal experience |publisher=HarperSanFrancisco |location= |year=1991 |pages= |isbn=0-06-250366-9 |oclc= |doi=}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = University of California Press |isbn =978-0-520-03083-1 |last = Glock |first = Charles Y. |author2=Robert Neelly Bellah|author3=Randall H. Alfred |title = The New religious consciousness |location = Berkeley |year = 1976}}
* Haan, Wim (Dutch language) ''De missie van het Goddelijk licht van goeroe Maharaj Ji: een subjektieve duiding'' from the series ''Religieuze bewegingen in Nederland: Feiten en Visies'' nr. 3, autumn 1981 (The article is mainly based on the Dutch branch of the Divine Light Mission) ISBN 90-242-2341-5
*{{Cite book|publisher = ] |isbn = 978-0-06-250366-4 |last = Guiley |first = Rosemary |author-link = Rosemary Ellen Guiley |title = Harper's Encyclopedia of Mystical & Paranormal Experience |year = 1991 |url = https://archive.org/details/harpersencyclope00guil }}
* {{cite book |author=Hunt, Stephen |title=Alternative religions: a sociological introduction |publisher=Ashgate |location=Aldershot, Hants, England |year=2003 |pages= |isbn=0-7546-3410-8 |oclc= |doi=}}
* Haan, Wim (Dutch language) ''De missie van het Goddelijk licht van goeroe Maharaj Ji: een subjektieve duiding'' from the series ''Religieuze bewegingen in Nederland: Feiten en Visies'' nr. 3, autumn 1981 (The article is mainly based on the Dutch branch of the Divine Light Mission) {{ISBN|978-90-242-2341-1}}
* {{cite book |author=Juergensmeyer, Mark |title=Radhasoami reality: the logic of a modern faith |publisher=Princeton University Press |location=Princeton, N.J |year=1996 |pages= |isbn=0-691-01092-7 |oclc= |doi=}}
*{{Cite book |isbn = 978-3-17-005609-1 |last = Hummel |first = Reinhard |title = Indische Mission und neue Fro?mmigkeit im Westen. Religio?se Bewegungen Indiens in westl. |location = Stuttgart Berlin Ko?ln Mainz Kohlhammer |year = 1980 |publisher = ]}}
* {{cite book |author=Kent, Stephen A. |title=From Slogans to Mantras: Social Protest and Religious Conversion in the Late Vietnam War Era |publisher=Syracuse University Press |location=Syracuse, N.Y. |year=2001 |pages= |isbn=0-8156-2923-0 |oclc= |doi=}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Ashgate |isbn = 978-0-7546-3409-6 |last = Hunt |first = Stephen | author-link = Stephen J. Hunt|title = Alternative religions : a sociological introduction |location = Aldershot, Hampshire, England; Burlington, VT |year = 2003}}
* {{cite book |author=Langone, Michael D. |title=Recovery from cults help for victims of psychological and spiritual abuse |publisher=Norton |location=New York |year=1993 |pages= |isbn=0-393-31321-2 |oclc= |doi=}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = ] |isbn = 978-0-691-07378-1 |last = Juergensmeyer |first = Mark| author-link = Mark Juergensmeyer |title = Radhasoami reality : the logic of a modern faith |location = Princeton, N.J. |year = 1991}}
* Levine, Saul V. in {{cite book |author=Galanter, Marc |title=Cults and New Religious Movements: A Report of the American Psychiatric Association |publisher=American Psychiatric Pub., Inc |location= |year=1989 |pages= |isbn=0890422125 |oclc= |doi=}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Syracuse University Press |isbn = 978-0-8156-2923-8 |last = Kent |first = Stephen A. | author-link = Stephen A. Kent|title = ] |location = Syracuse, N.Y. |series = Religion and politics |year = 2001}}
* {{cite book |author=Lewis, James P., Melton, J. Gordon] |title=The encyclopedia of cults, sects, and new religions |publisher=Prometheus Books |location=Buffalo, N.Y |year=1998 |pages= |isbn=1-57392-222-6 |oclc= |doi=}}
*{{Cite journal| issn = 0021-8294| volume = 25| issue = 2| pages = 233–247| last = Khalsa| first = Kirpal Singh| title = New Religious Movements Turn to Worldly Success| journal = Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion| date = June 1986| jstor = 1385479| doi = 10.2307/1385479| publisher = Blackwell Publishing}}
*] and Lewis, R. James. Department of the USA Army, Office of the Chief of Chaplains ''Religious Requirements and practices. A Handbook for Chaplains''
*{{Cite book |publisher = Verso |isbn = 978-1-85984-096-2 |last = Kopkind |first = Andrew | author-link = Andrew Kopkind|author2=JoAnn. Wypijewski |title = The thirty years' wars : dispatches and diversions of a radical journalist, 1965-1994 |location = London |year = 1995}}
* {{cite book |author=Miller, Timothy |title=America's alternative religions |publisher=State University of New York Press |location=Albany, N.Y |year=1995 |pages= |isbn=0-7914-2397-2 |oclc= |doi=}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Kok |isbn = 978-90-242-2341-1 |last = Kranenborg |first = R. |title = De Goddelijke Beginselen en de Verenigingskerk (2) |location = Kampen |series = Religieuze bewegingen in Nederland, Nr. 3 |year = 1981}}
* Richardson, James, T. ''Clinical and Personality Assessment of Participants in New Religions'', International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, Vol. 5, 1995
*{{Cite book |publisher = W.W. Norton |isbn = 978-0-393-31321-5 |last = Langone |first = Michael D. | author-link = Michael Langone|title = ] |location = New York |year = 1995}}
* {{cite book |author=Sutton, Robert Mize |title=Modern American communes: a dictionary |publisher=Greenwood Press |location=Westport, Conn |year=2005 |pages= |isbn=0-313-32181-7 |oclc= |doi=}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Tyndale House Publishers |isbn = 978-0-8423-6417-1 |last = Larson |first = Bob | author-link = Bob Larson |title = Larson's book of world religions and alternative spirituality |location = Wheaton, Ill. |year = 2004}}
* {{cite book |author=Wilson, Bryan |title=The social dimensions of sectarianism: sects and new religious movements in contemporary society |publisher=Clarendon Press |location=Oxford |year=1990 |pages= |isbn=0-19-827883-7 |oclc= |doi=}}
* ] in {{cite book |author=Galanter, Marc |title=Cults and New Religious Movements: A Report of the American Psychiatric Association |publisher=American Psychiatric Pub., Inc |year=1989 |isbn=978-0-89042-212-0 }}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Prometheus Books |isbn = 978-1-57392-222-7 |last = Lewis |first = James R. | author-link = James R. Lewis (scholar)|title = The encyclopedia of cults, sects, and new religions |location = Amherst, N.Y. |year = 1998}}
*{{Cite book| publisher = M.E. Sharpe| isbn = 978-0-7656-0151-3| last = Lippy| first = Charles H.| title = Pluralism comes of age : American religious culture in the twentieth century| location = Armonk, N.Y.| year = 2002}}
*{{Cite book | edition= 3rd |publisher =Cornerstone Press |isbn =978-0-940895-03-4 |last = Mangalwadi |first =Vishal | author-link = Vishal Mangalwadi |author2=Hoeksema, Kurt| title = The World of Gurus: A Critical Look at the Philosophies of India's Influential Gurus and Mystics |location = Chicago |year = 1992}} (See Chapter 10, 'The Divine Light Mission') (The first two editions were published in India by Vishal Mangalwadi as sole author in 1977 and 1987.)
*{{Cite book |publisher = Routledge |isbn = 978-0-415-24652-1 |last = Mauzy |first = Diane K. |author2=R. S. Milne |title = Singapore politics under the People's Action Party |location = London; New York |series = Politics in Asia series |year = 2002}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Wadsworth Thomson Learning |isbn = 978-0-534-54126-2 |last = McGuire |first = Meredith B. |title = Religion, the social context |location = Belmont, CA |year = 2002}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = University of Chicago Press |isbn = 978-0-226-56009-0 |last = McKean |first = Lise|title = Divine enterprise : Gurus and the Hindu Nationalist Movement |location = Chicago |year = 1996}}
*{{Cite book|publisher = Garland Pub. |isbn = 978-0-8240-9036-4 |last = Melton |first = J. Gordon. |author-link = J. Gordon Melton |title = The encyclopedic handbook of cults in America |location = New York |series = Garland reference library of social science, v. 213 |year = 1986 |url = https://archive.org/details/encyclopedichand00melt }}
*{{Cite book |edition = Rev. and updated |publisher = Garland |isbn = 978-0-8153-0502-6 |last = Melton |first = J. Gordon | author-link = J. Gordon Melton|title = Encyclopedic handbook of cults in America |url = https://archive.org/details/encyclopedichand0000melt |url-access = registration |location = New York |year = 1992}}
*{{Cite journal|last1=Melton|first1=J. Gordon, Project Director|author-link=J. Gordon Melton|first2=James R., Senior Research Associate|last2=Lewis|author2-link=James R. Lewis (scholar)|title=Religious Requirements and Practices of Certain Selected Groups: A Handbook for Chaplains by The Institute for the Study of American Religion|year=1993 }}
*{{Cite book |edition = 2d |publisher = Gale Research |isbn = 978-0-8103-8878-9 |last = Melton |first = J Gordon| author-link = J. Gordon Melton |title = Religious leaders of America : a biographical guide to founders and leaders of religious bodies, churches, and spiritual groups in North America |location = Detroit MI |year = 1999}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Gale Group |isbn = 978-0-8103-8570-2 |last = Melton |first = J. Gordon | author-link = J. Gordon Melton |title = Encyclopedia of occultism & parapsychology |location = Detroit |year = 2001}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Gale |isbn = 978-0-7876-6384-1 |last = Melton |first = J. Gordon. | author-link = J. Gordon Melton|title = Encyclopedia of American religions |location = Detroit |year = 2003}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = ] |isbn = 978-0-691-08952-2 |last = Michaels |first = Axel |author2=Barbara Harshav |title = Hinduism : past and present |location = Princeton, N.J. |year = 2004}}
*{{Cite book|publisher = ] |isbn = 978-0-7914-2397-4 |last = Miller |first = Timothy |author-link = Timothy Miller |title = America's alternative religions |location = Albany |year = 1995 |url = https://archive.org/details/americasalternat00mill }}
*{{Cite book |publisher = ] |isbn = 978-0-8135-4067-2 |last = Olson |first = Carl |title = The many colors of Hinduism : a thematic-historical introduction |location = New Brunswick N.J. |year = 2007}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = ] |isbn = 978-0-19-522042-1 |last = Partridge |first = Christopher H. | author-link = Christopher Partridge|title = New religions : a guide : new religious movements, sects, and alternative spiritualities |location = New York |year = 2004}}
*{{Cite journal| issn = 0034-673X| volume = 20| issue = 1| pages = 23–43| last = Pilarzyk| first = Thomas| title = The Origin, Development, and Decline of a Youth Culture Religion: An Application of Sectarianization Theory| journal = Review of Religious Research| year = 1978| jstor = 3509939| doi = 10.2307/3509939| publisher = Religious Research Association, Inc.}}
*{{cite journal|title=The Divine Light Mission as a social organization|journal=Sociological Review|year=1979|first=Maeve |last=Price|volume=27|issue=2|pages=279–296 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-954X.1979.tb00335.x|s2cid=144659402}}
*{{cite journal|journal=]|title=Clinical and personality assessment of participants in new religions|year=1995|first=James T.|last=Richardson| author-link =James Richardson (sociologist)
|volume=5|issue=3|pages=145–170|doi=10.1207/s15327582ijpr0503_1 }}
*{{Cite book|publisher = Fortress Press |isbn = 978-0-8006-0637-4 |last = Rudin |first = A. James |author2 = Marcia R. Rudin |title = Prison or paradise? : The new religious cults |location = Philadelphia |year = 1980 |url = https://archive.org/details/prisonorparadise00rudi }}
*{{Cite book|publisher = W.W. Norton |isbn = 978-0-393-03487-5 |last = Sadie |first = Julie Anne |author2 = Rhian. Samuel |title = The Norton/Grove dictionary of women composers |location = New York |year = 1995 |url = https://archive.org/details/nortongrovedicti00sadi }}
*{{Cite book |publisher = Lansdowne |isbn = 978-0-7018-0429-9 |last = Smith |first = Margaret. |author2=David J. Crossley |title = The Way out : radical alternatives in Australia |location = Melbourne |year = 1975}} "The Divine Light Mission in Australia" by Derek Harper & Michael McDonald
*{{Cite book |publisher = Chilton |isbn = 978-0-8019-6620-0 |last = Stoner |first = Carroll |author2=Jo Anne Parke |title = ] |location = Radnor, Pa. |year = 1977}}
*{{Cite book|publisher = Greenwood Press |isbn = 978-0-313-32181-8 |last = Sutton |first = Robert P. |title = Modern American communes : a dictionary |location = Westport, Conn. |year = 2005 |url = https://archive.org/details/modernamericanco00robe }}
*{{Cite book |publisher = AltaMira Press |isbn = 978-0-7619-8956-1 |last = Swatos |first = William H. |author2=Peter Kivisto |title = Encyclopedia of religion and society |location = Walnut Creek, Calif. |year = 1998}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = University Press of the Pacific U.S. Dept. of Defense Dept. of the Army Office of the Chief of Chaplains |isbn = 978-0-89875-607-4 |last = United States.;Kirschner Associates.;Institute for the Study of American Religion. |title = Religious requirements and practices of certain selected groups : a handbook for chaplains |location = Honolulu HI |year = 2001}}
*{{Cite journal| issn = 0038-0210| volume = 49| issue = 2| pages = 171–183| last = van Driel| first = Barend |author2=James T. Richardson| title = Categorization of New Religious Movements in American Print Media| journal = Sociological Analysis| year = 1988| jstor = 3711011| doi = 10.2307/3711011| publisher = Oxford University Press}}
*{{Cite book |publisher = ]; ] |isbn = 978-0-19-827883-2 |last = Wilson |first = Bryan R.| author-link = Bryan R. Wilson |title = The social dimensions of sectarianism : sects and new religious movements in contemporary society |location = Oxford; New York |year = 1992}}


{{refend}}
==External links==
*Article by ] (1983)
* by the psychologists of religion Dr. ] and Dr. Frans Derks in which they compared the adherents of the Divine Light Mission with followers of the ], originally published in ''Update: A Quarterly Journal on New Religious Movements'', X/2 (June 1986)
*
{{Prem_Rawat}}


] {{Prem Rawat}}
{{Sant Mat}}
{{New Religious Movements}}
{{Authority control}}


]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 17:41, 14 June 2024

Hindu organization

The Divine Light Mission (Divya Sandesh Parishad; DLM) was an organization founded in 1960 by guru Hans Ji Maharaj for his following in northern India. During the 1970s, the DLM gained prominence in the West under the leadership of his fourth and youngest son (Prem Rawat). Some scholars noted the influence of the Bhagavad Gita and the Radha Soami tradition, a.k.a. Sant Mat movement, but the western movement was widely seen as a new religious movement, a cult, a charismatic religious sect or an alternative religion. DLM officials said the movement represented a church rather than a religion.

When Shri Hans Ji Maharaj died in 1966, he was succeeded as guru by Prem Rawat, then just eight years old, despite rival claims from other family members. Although Prem Rawat was accepted as his father's successor, because of his age his family retained effective control of the DLM. In 1971, Rawat defied his mother by travelling to the UK and the US, where local branches of DLM were established and rapidly expanded. By 1973, DLM had over a million followers in India and tens of thousands of followers in the West, along with dozens of ashrams and hundreds of centers.

As Rawat grew older, he began to take a more active role in the movement and, when he turned sixteen, following the financially disastrous Millennium '73 festival, he took administrative control of the US branch. His increasing independence and his marriage to a non-Indian in 1974, caused a permanent rift with his mother and two of his brothers, Satpal Ji Maharaj and Bhole Ji Maharaj. They returned to India, where his eldest brother Satpal Maharaj took over the control of the Indian DLM.

In the early 1980s, Rawat began disbanding the western DLM. He closed the ashrams and eliminated the remaining Indian influences from his presentation to make it independent of any specific culture or religion. In the US, UK, France and Australia, Elan Vital was formed to replace the DLM in supporting Rawat in his role as teacher.

History

Founding and early years in India

Further information: Hans Ji Maharaj § Succession

Shri Hans Maharaj Ji, initiated by the Sant Mat guru Sri Swarupanand Ji, began teaching in the Sind and Lahore provinces of India in the 1930s. In 1950 he began initiating Mahatmas, followers who could themselves initiate devotees, and formed a magazine called "Hansadesh" which is still active in 2017.

In 1960 in the city of Patna, he founded the Divine Light Mission (Divya Sandesh Parishad) to organize followers across Northern India. At the time of his death on 19 July 1966, the Divine Light Mission had six million members in India.

During the customary 13 days of mourning, his mother and senior officials of the organization discussed the succession. Prem Rawat, who was 8 years-old at the time, addressed the crowd and was accepted by them as their teacher and "Perfect Master" and was named as Bal Bhagwan. Because of his age, effective control of the DLM was shared by the whole family.

International Footprints

In 1971, Rawat, then known as Guru Maharaji Ji, travelled to the West against his mother's wish & will. DLM was established in the U.S. and the UK. The U.S. branch was headquartered in Denver, Colorado. It was registered there as a non-profit corporation and in 1974 was recognized as a church by the United States Internal Revenue Service under section 501(c)(3).

By 1972 DLM was operating in North and South America, Europe and Australia. By 1973, DLM was operating in 37 countries, tens of thousands of people had been initiated (become premies) and several hundred centers and dozens of ashrams formed in the U.S. and the UK. DLM said it had 8,000 devotees and forty ashrams at that time.

In the United States, the staff at the headquarters grew to 125, and Telexes connected the headquarters with the ashrams. Social service facilities, including a medical clinic in New York City, were opened. A Women's Spiritual Right Organization dedicated to reaching out to persons in prisons, mental institutions and hospitals, was organized. The U.S. DLM published two periodicals: And It Is Divine (AIID), a monthly magazine with a circulation of 90,000; and Divine Times, a biweekly newspaper with a circulation of 60,000. The cover price of AIID was $1 but most were given away free, as were the advertisements. The World Peace Corps (WPC) was established as a security force to provide protection for Rawat. After Bob Mishler, the DLM President, was removed from power he said that Rawat got the idea to start a bodyguard unit after watching The Godfather. The WPC became the organizing agent of meetings and businesses. A variety of businesses were founded under US DLM auspices including laundromats, used clothing stores, a plane charter agency ("Divine Travel Services"), a repair service, and the "Cleanliness-is-Next-to-Godliness" janitorial service.

Detroit incident

On 8 August 1973, while Rawat was at the Detroit City Hall to receive a testimonial resolution praising his work, Pat Halley, who was at the time a reporter from Detroit's underground periodical Fifth Estate, slapped him in the face with a shaving cream pie. Rawat responded by saying that he did not want his attacker arrested or hurt, but the reporter was attacked by two men a few days later and seriously injured. When local members heard of the incident they notified Rawat in Los Angeles who extended his regrets and condolences to Pat Halley's family, and requested that the DLM conduct a full investigation. The assailants, one of them an Indian, were identified. They admitted their part in the incident and offered to turn themselves in. The Chicago police were immediately notified. The Detroit police declined to initiate extradition proceedings, variously claiming that they were unable to locate the assailants, or that the cost of extraditing them from Chicago to Detroit made it impractical. The arrest warrant remained outstanding. This lack of action by the Detroit police was attributed by some to Halley's radical politics. A spokesman later stated that the Indian national had been "shipped off to Europe".

Festivals

Festivals were a regular part of the Divine Light Mission's activities and a source of revenue. Members would pay from $50 to $100 to attend, and Darshan events would generate considerable donations. The DLM celebrated three main festivals: Holi, which is celebrated in late March or early April; Guru Puja, which was held in July; and Hans Jayanti, which falls in November. Hans Jayanti marks the birthday of the DLM's founder. According to Marc Galanter, the members at a festival in Orlando, Florida "looked as though they had been drawn from the graduate campus of a large university—bright, not too carefully groomed, casually dressed. They were lively, good-tempered, and committed to their mutual effort. There was no idleness, brashness, marijuana, beer, loud music, or flirtation—all hallmarks of a more typical assembly of people in their twenties". Other festivals were held nationally and locally, and sometimes organized with little advance notice. Attending as many as ten festivals a year meant many members were unable to hold regular full-time jobs, and required sacrificing leisure and community activities in order to devote time to earning the money needed to attend.

In 1972, seven jumbo jets were chartered to bring members from the U.S. and other countries to the Hans Jayanti festival held at the main ashram near New Delhi. 2500 foreign members camped out at the mission's "city of love" for a month. The event attracted a reported total of 500,000 attendees. When Rawat flew to India to attend, he was accused of attempting to smuggle $65,000 worth of cash and jewelry into the country, but no charges were ever filed. and the Indian government later issued an apology. The accusation led to negative coverage in the Indian press and hard feelings between Rawat and his mother, who had persuaded him to return to India for the festival.

In June 1973, the British DLM, with Prem Rawat's mother acting on behalf of her son, organized the "Festival of Love" at Alexandra Palace in London. While it drew thousands of attendees, Rawat began receiving hostile press coverage, partly due to his showing up late, or not at all, at scheduled appearances. The membership had grown very rapidly but the organizers had no clear idea where to lead the following, nor did they have the financial resources to maintain so many full-time workers.

Millennium '73

Main article: Millennium '73

The 1973 Hans Jayanti festival was held at the Astrodome in Houston, Texas, and publicized as "Millennium '73". The free three-day event was billed as "the most significant event in human history" that would herald "a thousand years of peace for people who want peace", the idea being that peace would come to the world as individuals experienced inner peace. To promote the event, Prem Rawat's 20-year-old brother, Bhole Ji Rawat toured with a 60-piece band, Blue Aquarius for two weeks giving free concerts. The 500-member tour was dubbed "Soul Rush" and traveled to seven cities on the way to Houston.

Rennie Davis, well known as one of the defendants in the Chicago Seven trial, attracted extensive media coverage as a spokesperson for Rawat. At the event, Davis declared that "All I can say is, honestly, very soon now, every single human being will know the one who was waited for by every religion of all times has actually come." In a press conference at Millennium, Rawat denied being the Messiah, and when asked by reporters about the contradictions between what he said about himself and what his followers said about him, Rawat replied, "Why don't you do me a favor ... why don't you go to the devotees and ask their explanation about it?" While Rawat's brother Satpal was nominally in charge of the festival, Davis was the "General Coordinator" and handled the details.

Expectations for the event were very high, with predictions that it would attract more than 100,000, or even as many as 400,000 people from Satpal. Davis privately said he thought 22,000 was a more realistic estimate and reserved 22,000 hotel beds. There was even talk about a space in the parking lot reserved for a flying saucer to land. When Satpal heard about the flying saucer he said, "If you see any, just give them some of our literature". The actual attendance was estimated at 35,000, and at 10,000 by police.

The event featured spectacular staging, a 56-piece rock band and a giant video screen that showed a barrage of shots from the tumultuous 1960s. Though it was not covered by the national television news, it did get extensive coverage in the print media. The premies were reported to be "cheerful, friendly and unruffled, and seemed nourished by their faith". To the 400 premie parents who attended, Rawat "was a rehabilitator of prodigal sons and daughters". Media people found a "confused jumble of inarticulately expressed ideas." It was depicted in the award-winning U.S. documentary "Lord of the Universe" broadcast by PBS Television in 1974. The event was called the "youth culture event of the year". Singer-songwriter Loudon Wainwright III visited the festival and later remarked that while the premies inside were looking happy the ones outside were arguing with Jesus Freaks and Hare Krishnas. Wainwright's song "I am the Way" was partly inspired by Prem Rawat.

At the festival, Larry Bernstein, a prize-winning, 41-year-old architect described a "Divine City" to be built from the ground up starting the following year. It was to feature translucent hexagonal plastic houses stacked on concrete columns and connected with monorails. Polluting vehicles would be replaced by electric vehicles, and solar power would be used to provide energy. Cards would replace cash. The use of advanced technologies to ensure pollution-free air, Rennie Davis told a journalist, would be a practical demonstration of what it means to have Heaven on Earth. Two sites were suggested: either the Blue Ridge Mountains or somewhere near Santa Barbara, California. The former president and vice president of the DLM later said that Prem Rawat had spoken frequently of building such a city. Plans for the city were delayed amid the fiscal crisis following the Millennium festival. Incorporation papers for the formation of the "City of Love and Light Unlimited, Inc." were filed in Colorado in 1974, and there was a failed attempt in 1975 to build the community near San Antonio, Texas.

The DLM incurred a debt estimated between $600,000 and over $1 million, attributed to poor management and low attendance. The debt severely damaged the DLM's finances. Event-related expenses were covered by short-term credit based on the expectation that contributions would pour in following the free festival. DLM's post-Millennium financial troubles forced it to close ashrams, sell its printing business and real estate, and to drop the lease on its IBM computer. Monthly donations fell from $100,000 to $70,000. According to Messer, "to pay the debts remaining from the Houston event, devotees all over the country turned over their own possessions to Divine Sales, which had crash garage sales, attended flea markets, and invented numerous activities to dispose of the goods." By 1976 it was able to reduce the debt to $80,000. Consequently, the festival necessitated policy shifts within the movement organization.

Marriage and rift

Because of Prem Rawat's age, Jagat janni Mata Ji, his mother, and her eldest son, Satpal Rawat (later known as Satpal Ji Maharaj) had managed the affairs of the worldwide DLM. As Prem Rawat approached sixteen he wanted to take a more active part in guiding the movement. According to Downton, "this meant he had to encroach on his mother's territory and, given the fact that she was accustomed to having control, a fight was inevitable". In December 1973, when he turned 16, Rawat took administrative control of the Mission's U.S. branch and began to assert his independence from his mother who returned to India with Satpal.

In May 1974, a judge gave Rawat his consent to marry without parental permission. His marriage to his secretary, Marolyn Johnson, a 24-year-old follower from San Diego, California, was celebrated at a non-denominational church in Golden, Colorado. Rawat's mother, Mata Ji, had not been invited. As a result of his marriage, Rawat became an emancipated minor. He called his wife "Durga Ji", after the Hindu goddess Durga.

Rawat's decision to marry a Westerner precipitated a struggle for control of DLM. His mother claimed that Rawat had broken his spiritual discipline by marrying, and had become a "playboy". She appointed Satpal as the new head of DLM India, but the Western premies remained loyal to Rawat. The marriage led to a permanent rift between Prem Rawat and his mother, and was also credited with causing a profound disruption in the movement. Many followers left the ashrams to get married, and the base of support inevitably shifted from the ashrams to the wider premie community. Others felt "almost betrayed", in part because he had championed celibacy, one of the requirements of ashram life, before getting married himself. The bad press from the festivals and the rift caused by Prem Rawat's marriage in 1974 marked the end of the movement's growth phase.

In 1975, Prem Rawat returned to India in an attempt to gain control of the Indian DLM. A court-ordered settlement resulted in his eldest brother Satpal retaining control of the Indian DLM, while Rawat maintained control of the DLM outside of India.

Westernization

Following the rift with his mother, Rawat announced that he was replacing the predominantly Indian image with a Western one and began to wear business suits instead of his all-white Indian attire. The Indian mahatmas were replaced with Westerners, and Indian terminology fell from use. Rawat encouraged premies to leave the ashrams. According to one estimate, the worldwide membership had declined from 6 million to 1.2 million by 1976, and in the U.S. the 50,000 claimed initiates had dwindled to 15,000 regular contributors. A spokesman for the Mission explained in 1976 that the higher numbers had been inflated due to poor record-keeping. One estimate had from 500 to 1200 members living in ashrams in the mid-1970s. By the end of the 1970s, the movement had lost an estimated 80% of its followers in the U.S. Bromley and Hammond attribute the decline of groups including the Divine Light Mission to internal factors, but also in part to the news media's "discrediting reports about their activities", accounts which created a "wide-spread public perception of 'mind control' and other 'cult' stereotypes."

The Divine Light Mission also attracted the attention of the anti-cult movement. Some members were violently kidnapped and deprogrammed. Some former members became outspoken critics of the organization and attacked the group with what Melton calls "standard anti-cult charges of brainwashing and mind control". In reference to ex-followers, DLM spokesman Joe Anctil said that "A lot of people were just on a trip in the beginning. They felt they had to be 'hyped', and some didn't stay long enough to get beyond that. But we've changed as our understanding has changed." Bob Mishler, the founding president of the DLM in the U.S., was removed by Rawat in 1977 and gave an interview in 1979, along with the former vice president, in which he said he was concerned that the DLM was becoming a "tax evasion for the guru", and said he feared a repeat of Jonestown. They also accused Rawat of engaging in inappropriate behavior. Mishler's charges found little support and did not affect the progress of the Mission.

In the 1980s, Prem Rawat removed the Indian trappings from his message, and adopted a more Western style. Melton said the mission was disbanded Prem Rawat personally renounced the trappings of Indian culture and religion, to make his teachings independent of culture, beliefs and lifestyles. Prem Rawat was no longer to be venerated as a god or regarded as a Perfect Master. The ashrams were closed along with the Denver headquarters (1979). The Divine Light Mission organization was replaced by Elan Vital; the U.S. organization's name was changed to Elan Vital in 1983, by filing an entity name change. Prem Rawat asked to be referred to as "Maharaji" instead of "Guru Maharaj Ji."

According to Ron Geaves, a religious scholar who has been associated with the teachings of Prem Rawat for the last thirty years:

Maharaji has chosen a route of perpetual transformation in which organizational forms are created and utilized and then destroyed, thus providing flexibility to deal with rapidly changing social attitudes, to provide pragmatic solutions to internal problems, and above all to keep his students focused on the core message rather than the peripheral requirements of organizational forms.

Since then the Elan Vital has been "virtually invisible." Rawat stopped granting interviews and making public announcements of his visits. As of 2008, he has continued to write, lecture, and tour with the support of the Elan Vital and the Prem Rawat Foundation.

DLM in India

In 1975, Mata Ji took control of the DLM in India as a result of the rift and installed her eldest son, Satpal Rawat, as its head. A lawsuit in India resulted in his brother Satpal gaining control of the Divine Light Mission in India, and Rawat continuing to lead DLM in the rest of the world.

Satpal Rawat, now known as Shri Satpal Ji Maharaj, teaches "Manav Dharam" (the "Dharam of Mankind"). He is also a politician and former Union Minister in India, and founded Manav Utthan Sewa Samiti, which he describes as "an all-India registered voluntary social welfare and charitable organization", that is also "making freely available the spiritual Knowledge which is the essence of all religions." Satpal Rawat's supporters now assert that he is the rightful successor to his father, Hans Ji Maharaj. Scholars that have written about the succession report that Satpal and the rest of the family accepted and supported Prem's declaration of succession for eight years.

The Divine United Organization (DUO) was an organization registered under the Societies Registration Act 21 of 1860 with the Registrar of Delhi in 1977, to disseminate the teachings of Prem Rawat in India. According to Geaves, DUO remained in India until it was replaced by Raj Vidya Bhavan . Raj Vidya Kender (Center for the King of Knowledge) states on its website that it was registered under the societies Registration Act in 1977, with registration No. 8845/77, "by individuals eager to help in the dissemination of Maharaji's message of hope and peace."

Beliefs and practices

Further information: Techniques of Knowledge and Teachings of Prem Rawat

According to some scholars, Shri Hans was influenced by both the Sant tradition and the Bhagavad Gita. Reinhart Hummel wrote that from the former came the reduction of Hinduism to the inner realization of the divine and the veneration of the guru, and from the latter the emphasis on the practical life. Hummel also noted that the DLM never developed a systematic doctrine, either during Hans' time or Prem Rawat's time. Hummel further asserted that the influence of the North Indian Sant tradition was dominant in Hans' eclectic thinking, and that from the Sant tradition also came the rejection of outward rituals and ceremonies; the rejection of asceticism in favor of life as a householder; the rejection of veneration of idols, and the focus on the guru as the manifestation of the divine. Hummel also noted that the four meditation techniques are of central importance to Prem, as they were to Hans.

No rules or regulations were imposed, and no beliefs or ethical practices were taught. The fundamental practices of inner peace were embodied and experienced through satsang, service and meditation, the sum of which is an experience called "Knowledge." Members of the DLM meditated formally twice daily and attended discourses on the Knowledge (known as satsang) when possible. According to Galanter "satsang could be delivered to active members or to those with only a casual interest. It was something of a polemic interspersed with parables, and because members were bright and sophisticated, these discourses tended to be engaging, making use of both Hindu mythology and Western philosophy". In a study by Flo Conway and Jim Siegelman, former followers said that they had spent 32.9 hours per week in group-related processes and ritual and 19.9 hours in additional study or indoctrination (lectures, seminars, workshops etc). Vegetarianism was encouraged but not enforced except in ashrams and Divine Centers.

Five "commandments" were part of the Divine Light Mission's teachings:

  1. Do not put off until tomorrow what you can do today.
  2. Constantly meditate and remember the Holy Name.
  3. Leave no room for doubt in the mind.
  4. Never delay attending satsang.
  5. Always have faith in God.

In the United States, the early years of the Divine Light Mission were marked by the rapid growth of loosely affiliated local ashrams, united mainly by a shared devotion to Guru Maharaj Ji. As the DLM became more and more structured and centralized, leadership and power came to be concentrated in the Denver headquarters. According to scholars, Prem Rawat's desire to consolidate his power and authority over the U.S. movement led to increasing formalization, with rules and regulations for ashram living, standards for recruited "candidates," and pressure towards certification of the movement's teachers. According to scholars Foss and van der Lans, the teachings of Hans Ji Maharaj were minimized after 1975, and followers were expected to accept Prem Rawat as their personal savior.

David V. Barrett noted that the DLM movement was often criticized for emphasizing the superiority of subjective emotional experience over intellect. The sociologists Ralph Larkin and Daniel A. Foss made similar observations in 1978. In response, the religious scholar Ron Geaves, himself a member of the movement, accused Foss and Larkin of bias.

A 1981 article based on the Dutch branch of the Divine Light Mission, stated that the DLM had little philosophical background and that all its central creeds and tenets were described in the song associated with the Hindu ritual called aarti. Arti was sung to Prem Rawat in the morning and evening in ashrams.

Rawat says he does not charge for teaching people the techniques of Knowledge. Related organizations that support the dissemination of Rawat's message are funded by donations. According to the Prem Rawat Foundation, it is supported by people who appreciate Rawat's message and wish to help make it available to others.

Members

In a comparison of new religious movements, Gartrell and Shannon noted that people appeared to seek out such religious organizations to get answers to questions about ultimate meaning as well as answers to more prosaic issues. In discussing the differences in recruiting tactics employed by these groups, they placed the Divine Light Mission in the middle ground between movements in which recruits were love bombed, or overwhelmed by waves of intense sentiment, and those in which affective bonds were discouraged. They reported that close ties between newcomers and DLM members developed gradually over a period of three to four months, between initial contact and their attending a "Knowledge session", and the emergent friendships were an important forum in which recruits aired doubts and discussed DLM beliefs. These relationships thus supplemented a very cognitive conversion process, in which active consideration of the movement's ideas and beliefs was encouraged from the outset. They found little evidence to suggest that social rewards were orchestrated by the movement, either in degree or timing.

The sociologist James V. Downton, who studied the DLM for five years, reported that the "idealism of these premies was one of the motivating forces behind their conversion . They wanted to create a more caring world". Five years after the subjects of his study became premies he wrote:

"There is little doubt in my mind that these premies have changed in a positive way. Today, they seem less alienated, aimless, worried, afraid, and more peaceful, loving, confident, and appreciative of life. We could attribute these changes to surrender, devotion, and their involvement in the premie community. Each of these undoubtedly had a positive impact, but, if we accept what premies say, none were as critical as their experience of the universal spirit. Meditating on the life-energy for five years, they report having more positive attitudes about themselves."

According to Carroll Stoner and Jo Anne Parke, when they visited an ashram the premies "appeared to be in control of their own lives and seemed to be achieving some measure of peace as a by-product of a lifestyle they feel is constructive and healthy". When the same members attended an appearance by Prem Rawat a week later, "they lost control, sobbed and swayed and knelt to kiss his feet."

According to Foss and van der Lans, members who joined before 1975 tended to be young people from the counterculture who had used psychedelic drugs. Later members, they asserted, were older and more responsible with ordinary jobs who were disillusioned with conventional religions or other Eastern movements.

A study of group cohesiveness carried out by Marc Galanter in 1974, based on questionnaire responses given by 119 DLM members randomly chosen from festival registration lines, found that after two years involvement with DLM, members reported a considerable decline in psychological distress and drug use compared to their pre membership status. The study found that 45% of those surveyed had used marijuana daily before joining, while only 7% did so at the time of the study. Seventy-one percent reported psychological stress before joining compared to 37% at the time of the study. Overall, 38% had sought professional help for psychological problems before joining. These observations led to what Galanter's describes as "an apparent overall improvement in psychiatric state derived from conversion and its retention through continued membership", and that members, whether they were seriously distressed or not before joining, reported an improved emotional state after joining. Galanter reports that 82% of members surveyed were single, 97% were white, and 73% were in their twenties. The percentage of these with Catholic or Protestant backgrounds mirrored the general population, while there were ten times as many members with Jewish backgrounds as in the general population (21% versus 2%). Three-quarters of them had attended college.

James V. Downton conducted a comparative study of 41 DLM members from three US cities, 29 members of the Hare Krishna movement and 40 college students. Among the DLM members the average age was 23 and ranged from 19 to 29. They came from middle-class backgrounds, all were white and had attended an average of 1.5 years of college, similar to the Hare Krishna sample, though DLM members were less likely to have come from broken homes. Sixty-five percent of DLM members reported having religious experiences while tripping on LSD. Overall, 95% of DLM members had used psychedelic drugs, compared to 89% of Hare Krishna and 67% of the college student cohort. Compared to the college students, fewer DLM members had had religious upbringings and they tended to have had worse family experiences though only 17% came from "broken homes".

One member, writing in the 1970s said that followers were "nagged to donate funds of their own" and some devotees signed pledges to donate a dollar a day to provide the Mission with some reliable income. One former accountant for the DLM said that new followers were asked to turn over their entire savings, sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars, and in several cases their families contested the donations. He was quoted as saying "it takes a lot of money to keep a guru." Bob Mishler, the mission's executive director, talked one person into signing over power of attorney shortly after she joined. Mishler was sacked by Rawat in 1976.

Ashrams

In India

The Divine Light Mission began creating ashrams in India in the 1960s, starting with a small one in Rajasthan and a larger one called Satlok ("Place of Truth") between Delhi and Haridwar. Khushwant Singh, who visited the Mission's headquarters in Delhi in 1973 described it as being like a fortress with 8-foot (2.4 m)-high walls, an iron grilled gate enclosing a courtyard and a complex of buildings capable of housing 100 and with the capacity to feed 50,000 visitors on special occasions. Singh also described "the lavish use of marble, wall-to-wall carpets, chandeliers and modern furnishings" as evidence of affluence.

In the West

Only a small fraction of the overall DLM membership lived in organized ashrams during its short history but several dozen ashrams were formed in the U.S., Britain, Europe and Australia. Ashrams were run by "general secretaries" appointed by the national office. Each ashram had a "house mother" who oversaw cooking, washing, ironing, and food service but the normal isolation of the housewife and cook became a communal, everyone-pitchin-and-help festival. Followers ("premies") who lived in them often worked part or full time at ordinary jobs and gave a sizable portion – sometimes all – of their income to the movement. Ashrams typically had an associated business, such as a Divine Sales outlet and a Divine Service Company. The ashram premies became the core of the Mission in the United States, but the ashrams themselves were not a source of income, never becoming more than self-sufficient. Followers wishing to stay in the ashrams established by Rawat were required to fill out detailed applications that focused on their trust funds, insurance policies, and other assets.

In Australia in the early 1970s, a small percentage of premies lived in ashrams. Some premies choose to live in an ashram for a couple of months, to get into their meditation, and then moved out into households or shared houses. Ashram rules demanded celibacy and abstinence from meat, alcohol, cigarettes and drugs. Married people, as well as single, lived in ashrams and, in their case, the practice of celibacy meant that they had sexual relations only with their marital partner. About three hundred people chose to live in communal houses and almost all households were non-smoking, non-drinking and vegetarian and, in some, the finances and energies were pooled for the good of all. Each household made its own decisions about life styles and often contained students and married couples.

In addition to the ashrams, there were many more residences with less formality. "Premie Centers", were households committed to the Mission's activity that donated 30% of their income and followed dietary rules, but that allowed married, non-celibate couples and children, and which weren't subject to orders from the national Mission. "Premie houses" were informal households (with as many as 30 followers) held together by their shared commitments and values. Ashrams served as local coordinating centers for all the local devotees.

Carroll Stoner and Jo Anne Parke wrote in 1977 of their visits to several ashrams that "there was no persuasion or cajoling for us to become part of this group. We did feel a sense of calm and peace in the ashrams. Marc Galanter, wrote in 1989 of his visit to a DLM ashram that —

"The atmosphere in the ashram was indeed quite striking. ... I was greeted in a friendly, even intimate fashion by people who were complete strangers. The intense communality of the members was immediately apparent, a quality that was clearly an important aspect of the group's function. One could sense a closeness among those present, and an absence of the minor tensions that would be expected in a setting where two dozen people were living in tight quarters. ... Caring and intimacy, reflective of the group's cohesiveness, seemed to mute any expression of animosity. ... I was made to feel as if I were entering a supportive envelope, to be protected from the rough edges of relationships in the outside world.

Reception

The Divine Light Mission was described in various and sometimes conflicting terms. It was called a new religious movement, a cult, a charismatic religious sect, an offshoot of Sant Mat, an alternative religion or spin-off from other traditional religions, a youth religion, a Radhasoami offshoot, an orthodox Sikh community, an Advait Mat related tradition, a proselytizing religion ("Guru-ism"), and a defunct religious movement. A study of terms used in U.S. newspapers and news magazines, which examined the media's failure to use the more neutral terminology favored by social scientists, found that the Divine Light Mission was referred to as a "sect" in 10.3% of articles, as a "cult" in 24.1%, and as both in 13.8%. It was referred to as a "sect" in 21.4% of headlines, with 0% for "cult".

The president and spokesman of the DLM said in 1977 that "they represent a church rather than a religion".

In some countries, the DLM faced persecution and even banning. In 1972, in Argentina, as part of a crackdown on small religious groups by the military junta, 87 members of the DLM were arrested in Mar del Plata on charges of using drugs and practising their faith. The DLM, the Hare Krishnas and the Jehovah's Witnesses were banned, reportedly at the behest of the Roman Catholic Church. The Government Junta of Chile (1973) arrested over 200 members, including 12 foreigners, in 1974. The Jehovah's Witnesses and DLM were also banned by Singapore authorities.

Bromley and Hammond described the Divine Light Mission as belonging in a "medium tension category", among movements that were seen by the public as peculiar rather than threatening, and to which society responded with watchfulness and ostracism. Psychiatrist Saul V. Levine wrote that the DLM, along with other groups such as the Unification Church, was widely held in low esteem – families felt their children were being financially exploited while the groups' leaders lived in "ostentation and offensive opulence."

Ron Geaves states that the Divine Light Mission "developed into a vigorous new religious movement with its own specific traits that included characteristics of a contemporary North Indian Sant panth (sectarian institution) and nirguna bhakti was combined with intense reverence for the living satguru and millennial expectations of the western counter-culture."

According to sociologist Pilarzyk the youth culture response – mainly from a decidedly leftist political perspective – was somewhat ambiguous, combining indifference with some instances of overt hostility. Pilarzyk mentioned that these criticisms usually focused on the perceived phoniness of the "blissed-out premies", the "hocuspocus" aspects of the meditation, and the "materialistic fixations" and physical condition of the guru. These accounts are described by Pilarzyk as being quite negative and full of distortions from the DLM's adherents point of view and drawing responses from them that varied from bewilderment and amusement to extreme defensiveness. Positive comments came from youth culture "folk heroes" such as anti-war activist Rev. Daniel Berrigan, radical lawyer William Kunstler, and singer-songwriter Cat Stevens.

Summarizing his 1985 review of studies of a number of new religious movements, such as The Jesus Movement, the Unification Church, the Children of God group in Europe and the Divine Light Mission, James T. Richardson stated that "life in the new religions is often therapeutic instead of harmful", and suggested that the young people attracted to these movements were affirming their idealism by their involvement. Richardson asserted that his review found there was little data to support the almost completely negative picture of these groups painted by a few mental health professionals and others.

Notable members

See also

Footnotes

  1. "Miami's startled elite wish the guru, in short, a pleasant stay", By Barry Bearak, Knight-Ridder Service, 30 July 1977. INDEPENDENT PRESS TELEGRAM (Long Beach, CA) A-11 "ACCORDING to Anctil and mission president Bill Patterson, they represent a church rather than a religion."
  2. Downton (1979), p. 5
  3. Melton (1992), pp. 217-218
  4. "Whatever Happened to Guru Maharaj Ji? ", Hinduism Today Magazine, October 1983 Available Online (Retrieved March 2008)
  5. Aagaard (1980)
  6. U. S. Department of the Army (2001), pp.1-5
  7. Fahlbusch et al. (1998), p. 861
  8. ^ Melton (1986), pp.141-2
  9. ^ Lewis (1998), p. 301
  10. ^ Hunt (2003), pp.116-7
  11. "American Express Search – ELAN VITAL INC". GuideStar. Retrieved 17 July 2014.
  12. ^ Oz in the Astrodome; Middle-class premies find Guru. The guru enthroned by Ted Morgan, New York Times, 9 December 1973, Page 338
  13. ^ Melton (1986), pp. 141-145
  14. ^ Price (1979)
  15. ^ "Indian Shrewdness Plus American Merchandising Equals Guru", BETTY FLYNN Chicago Daily News
  16. Messer in Glock & Bellah (1976), pp. 52-72
  17. "Snowballing Movement Centers On Teen-Age Guru From India", AP, THE LAWTON CONSTITUTION-MORNING PRESS, Sunday, 29 July 1973
  18. Messer in Glock & Bellah (1976), p. 66
  19. UPI (25 November 1978). "Maharaj Ji has Jones-like traits". Chronicle-Telegram. Elyria. p. A–3.
  20. "Guru's 17th birthday observed", KENNETH T. WALSH Associated Press, GREELEY (Colo.) TRIBUNE 11 December 1974 p.16
  21. "Guru Gets Testimonial And Some Pie in Face", "New York Times", 8 August 1973 Page 43
  22. "15-Year Old Guru Slapped in Face by Shaving Cream Pie", UPI, Los Angeles Times, 8 August 1973; pg. 2
  23. A-6 Independent (AM) Press-Telegram (PM) Long Beach, Calif., Wed., 8 August 1973
  24. Melton (1992), p. 222
  25. Page 2 – Section B – Sun News – Las Cruces, New Mexico – Wednesday, 22 August 1973
  26. I See The Light, by Ken Kelley, Penthouse (July 1974), page 98-100, 137-138, 146, 148, & 150-151.
  27. "Get Your Red-Hot Panaceas!", Ken Kelley, New York Times, 19 January 1974
  28. "Financing the New Religions: Comparative and Theoretical Considerations" JAMES T. RICHARDSON p.259
  29. 435 A.2d 1368. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Mark A. DOTTER v. MAINE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION. Argued 2 March 1981. Decided 19 October 1981. s:Dotter v. Maine Employment Sec. Commission 435 A.2d 1368
  30. Galanter (1999), p. 20
  31. Galanter (1999), pp. 22-28
  32. DuPertuis (1986), p. 118
  33. ^ "Some feel the youth is fraud" Long Beach, Calif., Sun., 19 December 1972 INDEPENDENT, PRESS-TELEGRAM A-27
  34. "Guru's Pupil Slates Talk", SYRACUSE POST-STANDARD 3 February 1973. p. 3
  35. Moritz, (1974)
  36. Downton (1979), pp. 187-8
  37. "The Mini-Guru: Discourse on Maharaj Ji is scheduled in Wiesbaden" J. KING CRUGER, 3 February 1973 THE STARS AND STRIPES Page 9
  38. "Under the Astrodome: Maharaj Ji – The Selling of a Guru", Gregg Kilday, Los Angeles Times, 13 November 1973
  39. ^ "Guru's Followers Cheer 'Millennium' in Festivities in Astrodome", by Eleanor Blau, New York Times, 12 November 1973
  40. "'Round and About" The Vidville Messenger. Valparaiso, Indiana, 25 October 1973
  41. Collier (1978), p. 170
  42. ^ "TV: Meditating on a Young Guru and His Followers", by John O'Connor, New York Times, 25 February 1974
  43. ^ "Oz in the Astrodome", by Ted Morgan, New York Times, 9 December 1973
  44. "Houston's Version of Peace in Our Time" GREGG KILDAY, Los Angeles Times 25 November 1973 p. S18
  45. ^ Kent (2001), p. 52
  46. Rolling Stone Magazine Issue N°156 – 14 March 1974 (Page 36-50)
  47. ^ Collier (1978)
  48. "A LOOK BACK AT THE '70S" HENRY ALLEN, Los Angeles Times 16 December 1979; p. K30
  49. Collier (1978), p. 159
  50. ^ Kent (2001), p. 156
  51. Foss & Larkin (1978), pp. 157-164 "in fact attended by a maximum of 35,000
  52. "Maharaji Ji: The Selling of a Guru, 1973", by Gregg Killday, Los Angeles Times, 13 November 1973, p. D1
  53. "Oz in the Astrodome" Ted Morgen New York Times
  54. Collier (1978), p. 176
  55. "Videotape Explorers on the Trail of a Guru" by Dick Adler, Los Angeles Times, 23 February 1974 p. B2
  56. ^ Foss & Larkin (1978)
  57. "They Won't Boo Loudon Any Longer", Grace Lichtenstein, New York Times, 3 February 1974
  58. ^ Kopkind (1995), p. 234
  59. ^ "Two ex-cult officers see possible Guyana repeat", UPI, Newport Rhode Island Daily News 25 November 1978. p. 8
  60. ^ Larson (2004), p. 151
  61. Rudin & Rudin (1980), p. 62
  62. Khalsa (1986)
  63. ^ Stoner & Parke (1977)
  64. ^ Pilarzyk (1978)
  65. Messer in Glock & Bellah (1976), p. 67
  66. Collier (1978), p. 166
  67. ^ "Guru following down; tactics changing", UPI, Waterloo Courier 25 November 1976
  68. ^ Messer, 1976
  69. "Growing Pile of Unpaid Bills Beneath Guru's Spiritual Bliss", Deborah Frazier, UPI, 23 March 1975, Lincoln, Neb., Sunday Journal and Star
  70. ^ Downton (1979), ch. 12
  71. ^ Geaves (2006)
  72. "Guru, 16, marries secretary" AP Tues. 21 May 1974 Greeley Tribune
  73. "The Guru's Wife Is Another Devotee", Robert P. Dalton, AP Staff Writer, Oakland Tribune. 23 May 1974.
  74. Downton (1979), p. 191.
  75. "One Lord Too Many". Time. 28 April 1975. ISSN 0040-781X. Archived from the original on 14 February 2008. Retrieved 31 May 2009.
    Mangalwadi, Vishal (1992). The world of gurus. Chicago, Ill.: Cornerstone. ISBN 978-0-940895-03-4.
    Melton, J. Gordon. (1986). The encyclopedic handbook of cults in America. Garland reference library of social science, v. 213. New York: Garland Pub. ISBN 978-0-8240-9036-4.
    Lewis, James; NetLibrary, Inc. (1998a). Cults in America a reference handbook. Santa Barbara Calif.: ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-0-585-05843-6.
  76. ^ Geaves in Partridge (2004), pp.201-202
  77. Richardson in Swatos (1998), p.141
  78. Olson (2007), p. 345
  79. Melton (1999)
  80. Melton (2001)
  81. ^ "Guru's cult changing style" GEORGE CORNELL, AP Religion Writer
  82. "Guru Maharaj Ji To Launch World Tour To Aid Mission" UPI, PLAYGROUND DAILY NEWS, 15 April 1976-Page 3E
  83. Bromley & Shupe (1981), p. 43
  84. ^ Lewis (1998), p. 83
  85. ^ Bromley & Hammond (1987), pp. 113-4, 227
  86. "Cult Deprogrammer Patrick Sentenced to Year in Kidnaping", JACK JONES. Los Angeles Times 27 September 1980, pg. SD_A1
  87. Melton (1986), p. 222
  88. Melton (1986), p. 219
  89. "FIRM LOYALTY: Guru's Sect: Misgivings in Malibu" MARK FORSTER Los Angeles Times 12 January 1979; pg. A1.
  90. Lippy (2002) p. 114
  91. ^ Melton (2003), p.2328
  92. Miller (1995), p. 364
  93. Abgrall (2000), p. 285
  94. Geaves, Ron. "From Guru Maharaj Ji to Prem Rawat: Paradigm Shifts over the Period of 40 Years as a 'Master'". In: Gallagher, Eugene V.; Ashcraft, W. Michael (eds.) (2006). Introduction to New and Alternative Religions in America. Vol. 4. Westport CT: Greenwood Press. pp. 71–73. ISBN 978-0-275-98712-1. {{cite book}}: |first2= has generic name (help)
  95. "Colorado Secretary of State, Business Center". Retrieved 17 July 2014.
  96. Elan Vital FAQs – About Elan Vital, Inc. Available online (Retrieved May, 2006)
  97. ""A Statement from Dr. Ron Geaves" September 27, 2004". Archived from the original on 20 November 2007. Retrieved 17 July 2014.
  98. Geaves (2004), pp. 45-62
  99. Melton (1986), pp. 221, 222
  100. "Contact Info – Events". contactinfo.net. Retrieved 19 April 2008.
  101. Melton in Partridge (2004), pp.201-202
  102. Downton (1979)
  103. Biography Resource Center. Farmington Hills, Michigan, Thomson Gale, 2007
  104. "Manav Dharam". 2008. Retrieved 9 March 2008.
  105. McKean, (1996), p. 54
  106. "Satpal Ji Maharaj". Archived from the original on 17 February 2006.
  107. Beit-Hallahami (1997), p.85
  108. United States (2001), pp. 11-5
  109. "Sant_Mat.pdf | Bhakti Movement | Religious Comparison". Retrieved 22 March 2018 – via Scribd.
  110. "About Us" page on Raj Vidya Kender website Archived 14 May 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  111. Hummel (1980), pp.76-77
  112. ^ Messer in Glock & Bellah (1976)
  113. Conway & Siegelman (1995), p. 361
  114. Levine, 1974
  115. Meredith (2002), p. 175
  116. Foss & van der Lans in Barker (1983), p. 305
  117. Barrett (2003), p. 65
  118. Geaves (2004), p. 45-62
  119. Haan in Kranenborg (1981) pp.55-57
  120. Saliba, John A. "The Guru: Perceptions of American Devotees of the Divine Light Mission", HORIZONS 7/1 (1980), 69-81
  121. Who Is Guru Maharaj Ji?, p. 229
  122. "The Keys, by Maharaji – "Is there a charge for viewing the Keys and receiving Knowledge?"". Retrieved 20 November 2008.
  123. "Maharaji in North America".
  124. "FAQ".
  125. Gartrell & Shannon (1985), p. 35
  126. Downton (1979), p. 87
  127. Downton (1979), p. 210
  128. Foss & van der Lans in Barker (1983), pp. 304-306
  129. ^ Galanter (1999)
  130. Downton (1979), pp 228-230
  131. Frazier, Deborah (23 March 1975). "Growing Pile of Unpaid Bills Beneath Guru's Spiritual Bliss". Sunday Journal and Star. Lincoln, Nebraska. United Press International. p. 11A.
  132. Price, Maeve (1979): The Divine Light Mission as a social organization. (1) Sociological Review, 27, Page 279-296
  133. Hans Jayanti (2000), pp.24-37. DUO, New Delhi, Book published in commemoration of the 100th anniversary of Hans Ji Maharaj's birth by Prem Rawat's Indian organization.
  134. Khushwant Singh (8 April 1973). "The Guru Business". The New York Times.
  135. Messer in Glock & Bellah (1976), p. 64
  136. ^ Messer in Glock & Bellah (1976), p. 65
  137. Melton (1986)
  138. Carter, Malcom N. (4 November 1973). "The guru who minds his mother". The Stars and Stripes. Associated Press. p. A6.
  139. Harper, Derek & Michael McDonald in Smith & Crossley (1975)
  140. Stoner & Parker (1977)
  141. Galanter (1999), p. 25
  142. Hunt (2003), p. 116; Derks and van der Lans (1983), p. 303; Wilson (1990), p. 209
  143. Beckford (1983), p. 195; Langone (1995), p. 41
  144. Galanter (1999), p. 19
  145. Lewis (2004), p. 24; Edwards (2001), p. 227
  146. Guiley (1991), p. 152; Barret (1996)
  147. Seiwert, H. (2004), "The German Enquete Commission: Political Conflicts and Compromises", in Richardson, James T. (ed.) (2004), Regulating Religion: Case Studies from Around the Globe, New York, NY: Luwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, ISBN 978-0-306-47887-1, p. 86
  148. Miller (1995), pp. 474, 364; Juergensmeyer (1991), p. 207
  149. Sutton (2005), p. 44
  150. Geaves (2002)
  151. Axel & Harshav (2004), p. 23
  152. Olson, Roger E., in Miller (1995), p. 364
  153. van Driel & Richardson (1988)
  154. "Miami's startled elite wish the guru, in short, a pleasant stay", By Barry Bearak, Knight-Ridder Service, 30 July 1977. Independent Press Telegram (Long Beach, CA) A-11
  155. Ferrara, Grace, M., Latin America – 1978, Facts on File.
  156. Gill (1998), p. 168
  157. "Five sect leaders in Chile sent to desert prison camp.", Jonathan Kandell, New York Times, 24 March 1974
  158. Mauzy (2002), p. 132
  159. Levine (1989), pp. 96, 102
  160. Pilarzyk, Thomas. "The Origin, Development, and Decline of a Youth Culture Religion: An Application of Sectarianization Theory" in Review of Religious Research. Fall 1978, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 23-43. At JSTOR
  161. Richardson (1995), p. 147
  162. "The Mail man, the Maharaji and the exploding love-bomb: Francis Wheen on: Divine intervention at the Daily Mail." Francis Wheen, The Guardian London, England, 14 July 1999
  163. "Paul Dunmall interview". Mind Your Own Music. Retrieved 2 February 2009.
  164. du Plessix Gray, Francine, "Blissing Out in Houston", New York Review of Books, 13 December 1973
  165. Gillmore brings intellect, idealism to country music", DAVID FRICKE Rolling Stone Magazine, reprinted in the Daily Herald 10 March 1994
  166. "Chess", by Richard Shorman Hayward Daily Review, 7 October 1973
  167. "Roadside Playboys and Texana Dames: The supernatural saga of the Hancock family" Archived 6 June 2009 at the Wayback Machine, MARGARET MOSER, Austin Chronicle 31 DECEMBER 2004
  168. Sadie & Rhian (1995)
  169. "Rodgers Follows Guru", Associated Press, Winnipeg Free Press, Friday, 23 January 1976

References

Prem Rawat (related topics)
Teachings
Books
Films
Related
Sant Mat
Sant Mat
Contemporary
movements
Contemporary
gurus
New religious movements
Major groups
Notable figures
By region
Concepts
Public education
Scholarship
Opposition
Lists
Categories: