| Revision as of 16:03, 13 August 2005 editUltramarine (talk | contribs)33,507 edits 2v← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:20, 30 April 2023 edit undoPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,784 editsNo edit summaryTag: 2017 wikitext editor | ||
| (878 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Criticism of communism''' may refer to: | |||
| {{npov}} | |||
| * ], which is criticism of the practical policies implemented by 20th century governments claiming to follow the ideology of Marxism–Leninism (usually known as communist states) | |||
| {{twoversions|20878980}} | |||
| * ], which is criticism of the political ideology and principles most often identified with the word ''communism'' | |||
| {{Template:Communism}} | |||
| {{disambiguation}} | |||
| :''Note that Communism is a branch of ]. This article only discusses criticisms that are specific to communism and not other forms of socialism. See ] for a discussion of objections to socialism in general.'' | |||
| Criticisms of ] can be divided in two broad categories: Those concerning themselves with the practical aspects of 20th century ]s, and those concerning themselves with communist theory. | |||
| ] | |||
| == Criticisms of 20th century Communist states == | |||
| === Arts, science, technology, and environment === | |||
| The Communist states censored the ], usually only allowing ]. Some Communist states have been involved in the destruction of cultural heritage: ] (planned destruction of historical centers of most towns — partially achieved in Bucharest), ] (repression of ]an culture, destructions during the ]) and the Soviet Union (destruction, abandon or reconversion of religious buildings) are the most cited examples . | |||
| ] | |||
| The Communist states also censored ]. One example is ] and ] of history. Research was suppressed in ] and ] (]), ] (]), ], ] and ], and even ]. In some Communist states it was common practice to classify internal critics of the system as having a mental disease, like ] - which was only recognized in Communist states - and incarcerating them in ]. See also ]. | |||
| Soviet technology generally lagged Western technology by many years. Exceptions include areas like the ] and military technology where sometimes the Communist technology was more advanced due to a massive concentration of research resources. Generally, however, much of the technology in the Communist states consisted simply of copies of Western products that had been legally purchased or gained through a massive espionage program. Stricter Western control of the export of technology through ] is often cited as one of the reasons for the fall of Communism . | |||
| Also pointed out is the environmental disasters. One is the gradual disappearance of the ] and a similar diminishing of the ] because of the diversion of the rivers that fed them. Another the pollution of the ], the ], and the unique freshwater environment of ]. Many of the rivers were polluted; several, like the ] and ] rivers in Poland, were virtually ecologically dead. In 1988 only 30% of the ] in the Soviet Union was treated properly. Established health standards for ] was exceeded by ten times or more in 103 cities in the Soviet Union in 1988. The air pollution problem was even more severe in Eastern Europe. It caused ], forest die-back, and damage to buildings and cultural heritages. According to official sources, 58 percent of total agricultural land of the former Soviet Union was affected by ], ], ], or ]. Nuclear waste was dumped in the ], the ], and in locations in the Far East. It was revealed in 1992 that in the city of ] there were 636 radioactive toxic waste sites and 1,500 in ]. . The environmental situation has continued to be poor in some post-Communist states, like Russia, but has improved in others, like in many of the Eastern European and the Baltic states . | |||
| ===Human rights violations=== | |||
| (See references below) | |||
| Extensive historical research has documented large scale human rights violations that occurred in these states, particularly during the regimes of ] and ], but shown to have started immediately after the ] during the regime of ]. Most prominent being deaths due to executions, forced labor camps, genocides of certain ethnic minorities, and mass starvations caused by either government mismanagement or deliberately. The exact number of deaths caused by these regimes is somewhat disputed, but the historical research shows at least tens of millions and several overviews give a number close to one hundred million deaths . Other widespread criticism concern the documented lack of ] in Communist Party regimes, religious and ethnic ]s, and systematic use of ]. | |||
| Many of the Communist states used an extensive network of civilian ] to spy on their own population. This created a society where no one could trust other citizens, who might report real or fabricated criticism of the Communist system to the ]. | |||
| The ], the ], and the ] can be seen as ] wars where military force crushed popular uprisings against the Communist system. There were also many internal uprisings suppressed by military force, like the ] and the ]. | |||
| The Communist states had strict restrictions on ], the most prominent example being the ]. | |||
| Many of the leaders of Communist states cultivated an extensive ]. In some cases the leadership of the state has become inherited. Critics have also argued that a new powerful class of party bureaucrats emerged which exploited the rest of the population. This ] is usually called the ]. | |||
| Several of the Communist states directly supported ]s with money, training and safe bases. Examples include the ], the ], and the ]. | |||
| The leaders of the Communist states themselves frequently announced their support for democracy, held regular elections and sometimes even gave their countries names such as the "]" or the "]". Some supporters of communist states have argued that those states were democratic. However, critics point out that, in practice, one political party held an absolute monopoly on power, dissent was banned, and the elections usually featured a single candidate and were ripe with fraud (often producing implausible results of 99% in favor of the candidate). | |||
| Some supporters of communism find this approach simplistic, noting that humans rights violations such as executions, forced labor camps, the repression of ethnic minorities, and mass starvation were patterns in both non-democratic Russian and Chinese history before their respective Communist takeovers. However, past evils in an old regime can hardly be used to justify new ones; otherwise supporters of ] could justify his deeds by pointing to past human rights crimes by the ] in Africa. Advocates reply that they only seek to put the events into perspective, not justify them. However, this defense can also be criticized. ] argues in his book ] that the living conditions and death rates of the inmates in the Soviet era ] were much worse than those of the Tsarist era ]s. The worst crop failure of late Tsarist Russia, in 1892, caused 375,000 to 400,000 deaths, while famines under both Lenin and Stalin caused many millions of deaths . | |||
| ''See also: ] | |||
| ===Economic and social development=== | |||
| Advocates of communism praise Communist parties for running countries that have sometimes leapt ahead of contemporary "capitalist" countries, offering guaranteed employment, health care and housing to their citizens. Critics of communism typically condemn Communist states by the same criteria, claiming that all lag far behind the industrialized West in terms of economic development and living standards. | |||
| Supporters of the Communist states note the social and cultural programs, sometimes administered by labor organizations. They include guaranteed employment, subsidized food and clothing, free health care, child care, and education. They point out to the high levels of literacy enjoyed by Eastern Europeans (in comparison, for instance, with Southern Europe), Cubans or Chinese. However, Communist compulsory education was full with pro-Communist propaganda and censored opposing views. Workers were not allowed to join free ]s. There were often great scarcity and rationing even of basic products like food and ordinary workers had to spend much of their free time waiting in queues. Some of these benefits can also be found in nations with market economies, like ]. The Communist states do not compare favorable when comparing states with similar culture and economic development before the Communist takeover. Examples include ] vs. ]; ] vs. ] and ]; and ] vs. ]. | |||
| ] | |||
| After 1965, life expectancy began to plateau or even decreased, especially for males, in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe while it continued to increase in Western Europe. This very large divergence between two parts of Europe went on during three decades leading to a profound gap in the mid 90s. The decline in life expectancy accelerated after the change to market economy in several of the states of the former Soviet Union but may now have started to increase in the Baltic states. In many Eastern European nations, life expectancy has increased significantly after the fall of Communism. . | |||
| Central economic planning has in certain instances produced dramatic advances, including rapid development of heavy industry during the 1930s in the Soviet Union. Another example touted by Communists is the development of the pharmaceutical industry in Cuba. Early advances in the status of women were also notable, especially in Islamic areas of the Soviet Union.. However, these examples are anecdotal and there are counter-examples: the failure of the Soviet Union to achieve the same kind of development in agriculture (forcing the Soviet Union to become a net importer of cereals after the Second World War), as well as the continued poverty of other Communist states such as Laos, Vietnam or Maoist China. China only achieved high rates of growth after introducing Capitalist economic reforms. Another example is ], which was among world's most developed industrial countries prior to ], but fell far behind the Western nations under the Communist rule. | |||
| Cuba is often cited as a successful example of by communists. However, Cuba was one of most developed nations in Latin America before Castro. Other Latin American nations have seen greater increases in literacy than Cuba. Calories per person has declined in Cuba while it has increased in most other Latin American nations. Cubans eat less cereals and meat than before Castro . | |||
| ===Were the Communist states communist?=== | |||
| Supporters of communism argue that a "Communist state" is an impossibility according to communist theory. They note that communism itself is stateless in theory and thus argue that it cannot be related to the actions of 20th century states. However, Marx’s dream of a socialist revolution involved a transitory phase known as the ]. Later, Marx reasoned, the state would "whither away". The Communist states claimed to be in this transitory phase and to be "working towards communism". It can thus be argued that the Communist states followed Marx's theory and that it failed to work in the real world. | |||
| ] and other ]s often argue that the bureaucratic and repressive nature of Communist states differs from Lenin's vision of the socialist state. However, during ], Lenin started "requisitioning" supplies from the peasantry for little or nothing in exchange. This led peasants to drastically reduce their crop production. In retaliation, Lenin ordered the seizure of the food peasants had grown for their own subsistence and their seed grain. The ] and the army began by shooting hostages, and ended by waging a second full-scale civil war against the peasantry. Official Soviet reports admitted that fully 30 million Soviet citizens were in danger of death by starvation. At the same time, the areas under White control had built up a food surplus. The famine of ] was much less severe in 1920, because after the reconquest of the White territories, the Reds seized the Whites' grain reserves, although they primarily sent them to cities with less hunger but more political clout. The ] suspended help in ] when it was revealed that the Soviet Union preferred to sell food abroad in order to get hard currency rather than feed its starving people. Estimates on the deaths from this famine are 3-10 million. Lenin started the slave labor camp system and 100000-500000 summary executions of "class enemies" occurred during his regime . Estimates of the number killed: . See also the references below. | |||
| Many Marxists and some Marxist-Leninists argue that most Communist states did not actually adhere to Marxism-Leninism but rather to a perversion heavily influenced by ]. On the other hand, many of the the Communist states were critical of Stalin and many of his policies, especially after his death. They tried many different political and economical systems during their existence. Examples include the profit-sharing in ], the extreme self-reliance in ], and the reforms in ] and ]. ] is a broad concept that includes episodes such as the self-sufficient ] during the ], the anti-intellectualism during the ], and the almost ] ]s. Lenin tried ] and the ]. However, many Marxists argue that the Communist states continued to use many of Stalin institutions and thus continued to be Stalinist. | |||
| Some communist supporters argue that the Communist states were not communist since they were not democratic. However, Marx rejected the concept of ]. He never gave any specific details or had any explicit requirements regarding how the dictatorship of the proletariat should be implemented. Some argue that Marx and Engels may have supported the claimed ] of the ] as a model for transition to communism. Others dispute this and there were human rights violations even during the few months the Commune existed . That all the Communist states became and remained totalitarian as long as the Communists remained in power can be seen as an argument against communism. | |||
| Some adherents to the Marxian doctrine of Historical Materialism argue that true communism can only develop as a response to the contradictions of bourgeois capitalism; therefore, the failure of those experiments in communism to date can be attributed to the fact they did not emerge in this manner. In short, some Marxists argue that, in order for a successful socialist revolution to occur, capitalism must first dominate the globe. The Soviet Union is a case in point - Tsarist Russia was quasi-feudal, not capitalist, and was overthrown by a small cadre rather than by a mass revolution. So it is argued by some Marxists that the failure of Soviet socialism to sustain itself is actually an affirmation of Historical Materialism. | |||
| Thus, as a defense of communism, it is claimed that so-called "Communist states" are unrelated (or only distantly related) to an ideal communist society. Therefore, it is argued, the failings of these states should not be taken as failings of communism ''per se''. Critics of communism find fault with this reasoning, noting that this argument cannot be falsified and is therefore not scientific. Were it valid, they argue, it could similarly be applied to capitalism, fascism or other ideologies. | |||
| == Criticisms of Marxism and communist theory == | |||
| See ] for a general critique of socialism. There are also some specific criticisms of Marxism and communist theory. | |||
| === Historical materialism === | |||
| ] is normally considered the intellectual basis of Marxism. It looks for the causes of developments and changes in human history in economic, technological, and more broadly, material factors, as well as the clashes of material interests among tribes, social classes and nations. | |||
| However, it ignores other causes of historical and social change, like biology, genetics, philosophy, art, religion, or other causes that are not "materialist" according to Marxists. | |||
| === Labor theory of value === | |||
| Fundamental to Marxist theory is the ]. It claims that the value (or, to be more exact, ]) of an item is determined by the ] required to produce it. In other words, the greater the amount of work necessary to produce an object, the greater the value of that object. This implies that value is ], and that it may not be reflected by the ] of the object in question (since price is determined by ], and is not linked to the amount of necessary work that must be expended to produce the object). The labor theory of value was first fully stated by ], from suggestions by ], and later adopted by ]. | |||
| By contrast, most capitalist economists now use the ], which implies that the only value of an object on which different observers can agree is its price on the market (which is based on the subjective utilities of the participants). Critics of communism hold that the qualifier "socially necessary" in the labor theory of value is not well-defined, and conceals a subjective judgment of necessity. | |||
| ===Marx's predictions=== | |||
| Marx made numerous predictions. He thought that the workers would become poorer and poorer as the capitalists exploited them more and more; that differences between the members within each class would become smaller and smaller and the classes would thus become more homogeneous; that the skilled workers would be replaced by unskilled workers doing assembly line work; that relations between the working class and the capitalists would get worse and worse; and that the capitalists would become fewer and fewer due to an increasing number of monopolies. | |||
| Some of these are debatable, while others have been clearly proven wrong. This is often cited by critics as evidence that historical materialism is a flawed theory. Communists reply with two arguments: The first is that there were a number of major events and trends over the past century and a half which Marx could not have predicted: ], ], the rise of ] and ] in the West (that introduced the concept of ], thereby narrowing the gap between rich and poor), ] and finally the ]. In response, critics maintain that if so many unpredictable events have happened in the past, then an equal number could happen in the future, and therefore Marxist theory is not a reliable method of making predictions. | |||
| Lenin noted that the predicted increasing class polarization and Communist revolution had failed to occur in the developed world. He then attempted to explain this by stating that ] is the highest stage of capitalism, and that developed countries had created a ] content with capitalism by exploiting the developing world. | |||
| After the Western nations voluntarily gave up their colonies, supporters of communism have attempted to explain this with still another stage, sometimes called ], arguing that the Third World is exploited even without formal empires. For criticism of this, see ]. | |||
| === Pseudoscience === | |||
| Marxism does not claim be to a science, however Historical materialism does. ] and others have argued that Historical materialism is a ] because it is not ]. Marxists respond that ]s in general are largely not falsifiable, since it is often difficult or outright impossible to test them via ]s (in the way ] can be tested). One response is that many social sciences like psychology, economics, and ] are increasingly being tested, for example by statistical methods. | |||
| <!-- | |||
| === Useful idiots === | |||
| The phrase ] is claimed to have been coined by Vladimir Lenin to describe a person in the West who would endorse the Communist states and their policies in the West. The implication of this was that the person in question was naive, and that he or she was being cynically used by the Communist states. However, Lenin never wrote it in any published document. | |||
| Lenin did state the following: | |||
| :"The so-called cultural element of Western Europe and America are incapable of comprehending the present state of affairs and the actual balance of forces; these elements must be regarded as deaf-mutes and treated accordingly.... | |||
| :"A revolution never develops along a direct line, by continuous expansion, but from a chain of outbursts and withdrawals, attacks and lulls, during which the revolutionary forces gain strength in preparation for their final victory.... | |||
| :"We must: | |||
| :"(a) In order to placate the deaf-mutes, proclaim the fictional separation of our government ... from the Comintern, declaring this agency to be an independent political group. The deaf- mutes will believe it. | |||
| :"(b) Express a desire for the immediate resumption of diplomatic relations with capitalist countries on the basis of complete non-interference in their internal affairs. Again, the deaf- mutes will believe it. They will even be delighted and fling wide-open their doors through which the emissaries of the Comintern and Party Intelligence agencies will quickly infiltrate into these countries disguised as our diplomatic, cultural, and trade representatives. | |||
| :"Capitalists the world over and their governments will, in their desire to win Soviet market, shut their eyes to the above- mentioned activities and thus be turned into blind deaf-mutes. They will furnish credits, which will serve as a means of supporting the Communist parties in their countries, and, by supplying us, will rebuild our war industry, which is essential for our future attacks on our suppliers. In other words, they will be laboring to prepare their own suicide."(''Stalin : The First In-depth Biography Based on Explosive New Documents from Russia's Secret Archives'', 1997, Edvard Radzinsky)(The Lufkin News, King Featurers Syndicate, Inc., 31 July 1962, p. 4, as quoted by the Freeman Report, 30 Sept. 1973, p. 8). . | |||
| According to ] and ], writing in their book ''In Denial: Historians, Communism & Espionage'', many ] studies in the field of ], especially in the area of ] have generally taken a benign view of the Party while minimizing ] atrocities and the ] nature of the movement. Haynes and Klehr attribute the biased stance of these historians, many of whom entered academia during the Vietnam War era, to anti-American and anti-capitalist sentiments. Haynes and Klehr characterize them as ]. There have also been similar criticisms of other fields in academia . | |||
| --> | |||
| == See also == | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| == References and further reading == | |||
| === Scholarly references on human rights violations by Communist states === | |||
| *Applebaum, Anne (2003) ''Gulag: A History''. Broadway Books. ISBN 0767900561 | |||
| *Becker, Jasper (1998) ''Hungry Ghosts : Mao's Secret Famine''. Owl Books. ISBN 0805056688. | |||
| *Conquest, Robert (1991) ''The Great Terror: A Reassessment''. Oxford University Press ISBN 0195071328. | |||
| *Conquest, Robert (1987) ''The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-Famine''. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195051807. | |||
| *Courtois,Stephane; Werth, Nicolas; Panne, Jean-Louis; Paczkowski, Andrzej; Bartosek, Karel; Margolin, Jean-Louis & Kramer, Mark (1999). ''The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression''. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674076087. | |||
| *Hamilton-Merritt, Jane (1999) ''Tragic Mountains: The Hmong, the Americans, and the Secret Wars for Laos, 1942-1992'' Indiana University Press. ISBN 0253207568. | |||
| *Jackson, Karl D. (1992) ''Cambodia, 1975–1978'' Princeton University Press ISBN 069102541X. | |||
| *Kakar, M. Hassan (1997)'' Afghanistan: The Soviet Invasion and the Afghan Response, 1979-1982'' University of California Press. ISBN 0520208935. | |||
| *Khlevniuk, Oleg & Kozlov, Vladimir (2004) ''The History of the Gulag : From Collectivization to the Great Terror (Annals of Communism Series)'' Yale University Pres. ISBN 0300092849. | |||
| *Natsios, Andrew S. (2002) ''The Great North Korean Famine''. Institute of Peace Press. ISBN 1929223331. | |||
| *Nghia M. Vo (2004) ''The Bamboo Gulag: Political Imprisonment in Communist Vietnam'' McFarland & Company ISBN 0786417145. | |||
| *Pipes, Richard (1995) ''Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime''. Vintage. ISBN 0679761845. | |||
| *Pipes, Richard (1991) ''The Russian Revolution''. Vintage. ISBN 0679736603. | |||
| *Rummel, R.J. (1996). ''Lethal Politics: Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1917.'' Transaction Publishers ISBN 1560008873. | |||
| *Todorov, Tzvetan & Zaretsky, Robert (1999). ''Voices from the Gulag: Life and Death in Communist Bulgaria''. Pennsylvania State University Press. ISBN 0271019611. | |||
| *Van Canh, Nyuyen (1985) ''Vietnam Under Communism, 1975-1982.'' Hoover Institution Press. ISBN 0817978526. | |||
| *Yakovlev, Alexander (2004). ''A Century of Violence in Soviet Russia.'' Yale University Press. ISBN 0300103220. | |||
| == External links == | |||
| === Criticisms of communism and the Communist states === | |||
| * | |||
| * A Cato institute article, from a Capitalist point of view. | |||
| * Chinese and general communism analysis. | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| ====Online number estimates of Communist democide==== | |||
| * Note that only some of numbers are totals for the Communist states. | |||
| * | |||
| ** | |||
| ** | |||
| ** | |||
| ** | |||
| === Support for communism === | |||
| ====Support for the Communist states==== | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| ====Communists opposed to the Communist states==== | |||
| * | |||
| ** | |||
| ** | |||
| ** An analysis of ], from a ] point of view. | |||
| * | |||
| ===Neutral=== | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 03:20, 30 April 2023
Criticism of communism may refer to:
- Criticism of communist party rule, which is criticism of the practical policies implemented by 20th century governments claiming to follow the ideology of Marxism–Leninism (usually known as communist states)
- Criticism of Marxism, which is criticism of the political ideology and principles most often identified with the word communism
This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Criticism of communism.If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article. Categories: