| Revision as of 21:01, 30 April 2008 editDarkspots (talk | contribs)6,346 edits adding mention of Nazi architecture← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:53, 11 May 2008 edit undoDarkspots (talk | contribs)6,346 editsm →User:SirIsaacBrock: spelling | ||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{SSPa}} | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| ;Suspected sockpuppeteer | ;Suspected sockpuppeteer | ||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
| ;Evidence | ;Evidence | ||
| Chessy999 has edited ] to defend the article in the form written by |
Chessy999 has edited ] to defend the article in the form written by SirIsaacBrock: | ||
| Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
| Chessy999, SirIsaacBrock, and ] (a confirmed sock of SirIsaacBrock) have all edited ]. | Chessy999, SirIsaacBrock, and ] (a confirmed sock of SirIsaacBrock) have all edited ]. | ||
| Chessy999 and SirIsaacBrock have both edited articles about accounting, infantry weapons, War of 1812 battles, fighting dogs (obviously), chess and specifically chess pieces (many for Chessy, for SirIsaacBrook), Nazism, and Canadian military history. The ''majority'' of the edits of each user fall into one of these categories of articles. | |||
| This is all too close for coincidence. SirIsaacBrock is banned by the community for disruptive behavior and rampant sockpuppetry (]). Chessy999 has a lot of civility/tendentious editing complaints on his user talk page. This user should be indef blocked as the sockpuppet of a banned user. | This is all too close for coincidence. SirIsaacBrock is banned by the community for disruptive behavior and rampant sockpuppetry (]). Chessy999 has a lot of civility/tendentious editing complaints on his user talk page. This user should be indef blocked as the sockpuppet of a banned user. | ||
| Line 36: | Line 39: | ||
| ;Comments | ;Comments | ||
| After looking a little more at the edits of the two accounts, I would have to agree. | |||
| Chessy seems to have taken over the work that SirIsaac was doing on the monkey-baiting article, defending the same sections in the same manner. | |||
| They both have made edits on articles relating to terrorism in Canada, Nazi books, Nazi architecture, Hunting/Fighting dog breeds, articles relating to firearms, articles relating to finance/accounting and they both refer to users who they have content disputes as vandals. | |||
| I have no details regarding IPs etc, however apart from a few slight differences, both users edit the same or very closely related articles - I would agree with the above, baiting dogs/fighting dogs, Nazi books, Nazi architecture, Canadian conflicts/terrorism and military firearms. | |||
| I would not care so much if Chessy was a sockpuppet of a banned user, if Chessy had been blocked, decided on a new start, and kept a low profile - acting in a way that is helpful. He does not, it is still the same aggressive editor, with a total arrogant lack of respect for others, their edits and consensus. ] (]) 03:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Chessy999, SirIsaacBrock, and ] have all edited the following: | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_conflicts_in_Canada&limit=500&action=history | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Old_English_Bulldog&limit=500&action=history | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_Adolf_Hitler_books&limit=500&action=history | |||
| I could go back further and check every single edit, but doing it manually is a pain in the ass. | |||
| It seems very suspect that you would have 3 editors with such shared interests, I would understand if they shared one category, but to share an interest in Nazi architecture and books, monkeys fighting dogs, accountancy, chess and 1812 seems to be too much to put down to coincedence. ] (]) 07:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Looks obvious to me; also quite a few coincidences with {{user|PianoKeys}}, who was active between May and July 2007. --] ] 12:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::: If the edits of Pianokeys match up with those of the above editors, then it would all make sense. There was a small gap between writercramp/sirisaac and chessy..but who knows there could well be another 5 or 6 accounts out there. | |||
| :::: ] (]) 16:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: I have looked at the history of some of the articles, and could not find any other recent accounts; I have found {{user|Octopus-Hands}} which looks likely, but no edits from that user since February 2007. --] ] 17:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ;Conclusions | ;Conclusions | ||
| Quack. Blocked. <sub>]</sub><sup>]/]</sup> 09:13, 11 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | ---- | ||
Latest revision as of 12:53, 11 May 2008
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
User:SirIsaacBrock
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
SirIsaacBrock (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
Chessy999 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
Darkspots (talk) 19:01, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Evidence
Chessy999 has edited Monkey-baiting to defend the article in the form written by SirIsaacBrock:
Both users have edited the following (partial) list of articles:
They have both moved Bait (dogs), from some other article name to that article name. Chessy999: SirIsaacBrock:
Chessy999, SirIsaacBrock, and User:WritersCramp (a confirmed sock of SirIsaacBrock) have all edited Nazi architecture.
Chessy999 and SirIsaacBrock have both edited articles about accounting, infantry weapons, War of 1812 battles, fighting dogs (obviously), chess and specifically chess pieces (many for Chessy, for SirIsaacBrook), Nazism, and Canadian military history. The majority of the edits of each user fall into one of these categories of articles.
This is all too close for coincidence. SirIsaacBrock is banned by the community for disruptive behavior and rampant sockpuppetry (Misplaced Pages:List of banned users#SirIsaacBrock). Chessy999 has a lot of civility/tendentious editing complaints on his user talk page. This user should be indef blocked as the sockpuppet of a banned user.
- Comments
After looking a little more at the edits of the two accounts, I would have to agree.
Chessy seems to have taken over the work that SirIsaac was doing on the monkey-baiting article, defending the same sections in the same manner. They both have made edits on articles relating to terrorism in Canada, Nazi books, Nazi architecture, Hunting/Fighting dog breeds, articles relating to firearms, articles relating to finance/accounting and they both refer to users who they have content disputes as vandals.
I have no details regarding IPs etc, however apart from a few slight differences, both users edit the same or very closely related articles - I would agree with the above, baiting dogs/fighting dogs, Nazi books, Nazi architecture, Canadian conflicts/terrorism and military firearms.
I would not care so much if Chessy was a sockpuppet of a banned user, if Chessy had been blocked, decided on a new start, and kept a low profile - acting in a way that is helpful. He does not, it is still the same aggressive editor, with a total arrogant lack of respect for others, their edits and consensus. Sennen goroshi (talk) 03:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Chessy999, SirIsaacBrock, and User:WritersCramp have all edited the following:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_conflicts_in_Canada&limit=500&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Old_English_Bulldog&limit=500&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_Adolf_Hitler_books&limit=500&action=history
I could go back further and check every single edit, but doing it manually is a pain in the ass.
It seems very suspect that you would have 3 editors with such shared interests, I would understand if they shared one category, but to share an interest in Nazi architecture and books, monkeys fighting dogs, accountancy, chess and 1812 seems to be too much to put down to coincedence. Sennen goroshi (talk) 07:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Looks obvious to me; also quite a few coincidences with PianoKeys (talk · contribs), who was active between May and July 2007. --Snigbrook 12:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- If the edits of Pianokeys match up with those of the above editors, then it would all make sense. There was a small gap between writercramp/sirisaac and chessy..but who knows there could well be another 5 or 6 accounts out there.
- Sennen goroshi (talk) 16:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- I have looked at the history of some of the articles, and could not find any other recent accounts; I have found Octopus-Hands (talk · contribs) which looks likely, but no edits from that user since February 2007. --Snigbrook 17:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Conclusions
Quack. Blocked. GB 09:13, 11 May 2008 (UTC)