| Revision as of 17:08, 13 August 2005 editVBGFscJUn3 (talk | contribs)5,058 edits →[]← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:58, 6 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page. | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the VfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result of the debate was '''delete''' --]] 19:53, 23 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Get a life. No place in a serious encyclopedia. ] | Get a life. No place in a serious encyclopedia. ] | ||
| *'''Keep''' and ignore this troll, he has VFD a whole slew of material that should not be. Most being stubs that people were editing at the time. Walsh is currently reported for this behavior after refusing to stop. He just sits on new articles and VFDs them without any consideration. ''(Unsigned by ])'' | *'''Keep''' and ignore this troll, he has VFD a whole slew of material that should not be. Most being stubs that people were editing at the time. Walsh is currently reported for this behavior after refusing to stop. He just sits on new articles and VFDs them without any consideration. ''(Unsigned by ])'' | ||
| *''' |
**'''Delete'''I was trying to keep up with Walsh posting VFD on new articles before he created too many flame wars. After reading and googling I agree the article is cruft and should be removed--] 17:41, 13 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ***Do you want to strike your original vote with the <strike> tag, for clarity's sake? - ] (] | ]) 20:56, 13 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Comment''': ] seems to be very "]". That doesn't make him wrong (since this article does not seem very useful or well written) but his nominations for deletion should be taken with a grain of salt. ] 17:08, 13 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *Irrespective of the nominator's credentials, this article is webcruft that should be '''delete'''d. ] 17:15, 13 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete'''. This is in fact an instance of forumcruft and should be deleted; however, that does not excuse the personal attack in ]'s nomination. ] ]/] 17:21, 13 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' nn forumcruft. -] 17:52, 13 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' forumcruft, but come on. This isn't necessarily any geekier than, say, contributing to an online encyclopedia. - ] (] | ]) 20:54, 13 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| **You have a point. Who are we kidding? Most non-Wikipedians would probably think we all need to get lives. -] ("<span style="color:#ba0000;"><u>Sarah</u></span>") 02:30, 14 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ***Heck, I'm a Wikipedian and I think we all need to get lives. ;) - ] (] | ]) 03:48, 14 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete'''. -] ("<span style="color:#ba0000;"><u>Sarah</u></span>") 02:30, 14 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> | |||
Latest revision as of 08:58, 6 February 2023
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Tony Sidaway 19:53, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Dark Lords Council
Get a life. No place in a serious encyclopedia. Erwin Walsh
- Keep and ignore this troll, he has VFD a whole slew of material that should not be. Most being stubs that people were editing at the time. Walsh is currently reported for this behavior after refusing to stop. He just sits on new articles and VFDs them without any consideration. (Unsigned by Gorgonzilla)
- DeleteI was trying to keep up with Walsh posting VFD on new articles before he created too many flame wars. After reading and googling I agree the article is cruft and should be removed--Gorgonzilla 17:41, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- Do you want to strike your original vote with the <strike> tag, for clarity's sake? - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 20:56, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- DeleteI was trying to keep up with Walsh posting VFD on new articles before he created too many flame wars. After reading and googling I agree the article is cruft and should be removed--Gorgonzilla 17:41, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: Erwin Walsh seems to be very "delete-happy". That doesn't make him wrong (since this article does not seem very useful or well written) but his nominations for deletion should be taken with a grain of salt. Explodicle 17:08, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- Irrespective of the nominator's credentials, this article is webcruft that should be deleted. Martg76 17:15, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. This is in fact an instance of forumcruft and should be deleted; however, that does not excuse the personal attack in Erwin Walsh's nomination. Fernando Rizo T/C 17:21, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nn forumcruft. -Splash 17:52, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete forumcruft, but come on. This isn't necessarily any geekier than, say, contributing to an online encyclopedia. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 20:54, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- You have a point. Who are we kidding? Most non-Wikipedians would probably think we all need to get lives. -Aranel ("Sarah") 02:30, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Heck, I'm a Wikipedian and I think we all need to get lives. ;) - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 03:48, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- You have a point. Who are we kidding? Most non-Wikipedians would probably think we all need to get lives. -Aranel ("Sarah") 02:30, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. -Aranel ("Sarah") 02:30, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.