Revision as of 18:23, 16 August 2005 editSpangineer (talk | contribs)Administrators16,440 edits Rubik's Cube← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:18, 4 November 2021 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,063 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Flowerparty/Archive 2) (bot | ||
(561 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|3=September 11, 2009}} | |||
] | |||
{{Archives|auto=short|style=width:60px;}}{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
|maxarchivesize = 128K | |||
|counter = 2 | |||
|algo = old(48h) | |||
|archive = User talk:Flowerparty/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
== |
==Deletion review for ]== | ||
An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> ] (]) 19:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
I know it's been a great many years, but do you remember where you got the release date for The Fall's '']''? All contemporaneous articles I've found hover in the May/June time frame; though, admittedly, none of those articles was from the U.K. ] (]) 22:28, 17 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
You've reverted blanking on the above article twice now... Notably, a vote of deletion has been placed on the article by its author and only editor who had blanked it. I am a relative newbie, so please explain if there is a reason that it should be unblanked, and not just speedy-deleted...? --] ] 08:44, 1 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:The Slider.jpg== | |||
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 03:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
==Thank you!== | |||
== "The Voice (EP) (Album)" listed at ] == | |||
Thank you for your support on my RfA! When I submitted it, I was unsure of how I'd do, but the support was great. I promise that I won't do anything ''too'' stupid with the trust you've given me. ''']''']]<sup>]</sup> 19:44, 2 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
:P.S. Stop by ]! | |||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''The Voice (EP) (Album)'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 08:42, 30 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
== "High Voltage (Interntional album)" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> Regards, ]'']'' 22:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Speedy deletion nomination of Off The Record == | |||
== vfd == | |||
Hello Flowerparty, | |||
You should have kept it in sandbox until the entry was ready. ] 22:10, 6 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ] for deletion, because it seems to be ], rather than an encyclopedia article. | |||
== Style Manual == | |||
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can <span class="plainlinks">''''''</span>, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. | |||
The link in your comment to the Style Manual is a dead link (it's red). I tried to find something like that, but couldn't, so I just assumed the articles I was looking at were sloppy. However, I do think some of the changes I made were appropriate, like making separate sections for the card series vs. the movie, and deleting a dead external link. ] 19:30, 2005 August 9 (UTC) | |||
You can leave a note on ] if you have questions. Thanks! | |||
== Thanks for your support == | |||
] | |||
Thank you for voting to support ]. I've been promoted, and I promise to wield the mop with good faith, patience, and fairness... except when I'm exterminating vandals with the M-16 recoilless nuclear Gatling mop. --] ] 07:49, 10 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
<small>Message delivered via the ] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.</small><!-- Template:Spam-warn-NPF --> | |||
==Songs/Album colors== | |||
Thank you for pointing that out - both sides were incomplete, and gosh it was hard to kind the key. Noticed some inconsistencies so i went in to clean up - thanks for pointing out the extra table. though it doesnt seem to include a couple other single categories, like the lightblue for 12" MAXI singles. ] 12:20 10 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
::You responded saying there shouldnt be additional color codes for singles. Too late :) - they already have been. | |||
] (] | ]) @ 15:29, 3 November 2021 (UTC) | |||
::(see http://en.wikipedia.org/Like_a_Virgin_%28song%29) I didn't make the color code, but it made sense so I added it to the album table (see Madonna's MAXI Single list for example - (http://en.wikipedia.org/Like_a_Virgin_%28song%29) all in lightblue. | |||
::so they all need to be adjusted to yellow, or this additional category which seems to be in place needs to be promoted. :) ] 12:29 10 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
== Func's RfA :) == | |||
Flowerparty, I want to thank you for not being ''rude'' and supporting my adminship, thank you very much! :) | |||
Please never hesitate to let me know if you have concerns with any administrative action I may make. | |||
]( ], ], ], ) 19:13, 11 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
==More Gopal Das!== | |||
Regarding the ] and ] articles, which were the subject of that dramatic VfD; they now have a category, and that category has four articles in it. Looking through those four, however, they're rather stubby; I was thinking about merging them into a new article called ], and explaining what the hell an ECK Master is. Looking at the Eckankar website, there's more of these guys, and researching them and writing on them would be a learning experience for me, which is always welcome. It would also make them less vulnerable to VfDs; "ECK Master" gets a substantial number of Google hits, whereas "Rami Nuri" performs dismally. In fact, the second thing that pops up is that note you left on my talk page. What do you think? ] 19:57, 12 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
:Yeah, that sounds like a sensible, nay excellent idea. Much more managable, anyway. I thought about tidying up the ] page before but was kind of worried about showing my face 'round there, and never got much past the first paragraph; "brought forth"? "...for spiritual upliftment"?! But if you're feeling '''bold''' I'll have a look at it. I think it's got a long way to go before it follows Xenu, though! ] ] 22:59, 12 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
::The Eckankar main article has problems. So do the subarticles, actually. But, I'm just writing to say that I took out a book in the university library and am going through the website, and the new article is going to be different and thoroughly referenced. It has the potential to be just as horrifying as Xenu. It's a work in progress, but none of it is yet saved in Misplaced Pages, just on my computer. ] 00:13, 14 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
::: ] ] 00:29, 15 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
== Rubik's Cube == | |||
Sorry about that; I'm not sure what happened (I was editing the external link section). I've switched back to mathematics, but I think it's better to not use the main article format. I've heard that using "main article: " is only used when that section is about twice the length of the lead of the article being linked to, and in any case, the section doesn't treat just the contents of that article. The article I split off is just about math, not about physics, so it doesn't really belong there, in my opinion. --] <small>]</small> 18:23, August 16, 2005 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 02:18, 4 November 2021
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Flowerparty has not edited Misplaced Pages since September 11, 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Deletion review for Amharic Misplaced Pages
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Amharic Misplaced Pages. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. A12n (talk) 19:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
I know it's been a great many years, but do you remember where you got the release date for The Fall's The Frenz Experiment? All contemporaneous articles I've found hover in the May/June time frame; though, admittedly, none of those articles was from the U.K. alainsane (talk) 22:28, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Slider.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Slider.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
"The Voice (EP) (Album)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Voice (EP) (Album). Since you had some involvement with the The Voice (EP) (Album) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:42, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
"High Voltage (Interntional album)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect High Voltage (Interntional album). The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 18#High Voltage (Interntional album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 22:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Off The Record
Hello Flowerparty,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Off The Record for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Tol (talk | contribs) @ 15:29, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Categories: