Misplaced Pages

Talk:1 gigametre: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:23, 11 May 2008 editJohn J. Bulten (talk | contribs)12,763 editsm moved Talk:1 E+9 m to Talk:1 gigametre: 1m← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:24, 17 January 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,377 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: paws [2.2] 
(13 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Merged-to|Orders of magnitude (length)|13 July 2016}}
{{oldafdfull|date= ] ] |result= '''Keep''' |page= 1 E0 m }}
{{oldafdmulti
|date= 18 March 2008
|result= '''Keep'''
|page= 1 E0 m
|date2=12 January 2013
|page2=1 gigametre
|result2='''Procedural Close'''
|date3=13 January 2013
|page3=1 metre
|result3='''No Consensus'''
|date4=4 July 2016
|page4=1 myriametre
|result4='''Merge''' to ]}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Measurement|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Lists|importance=low}}
}}
<!-- Formerly assessed as list-class -->

== layout ==

the layout is really confusing: the heading "shorter than distance X" if followed by a list of entries that are greater than X, which makes no sense.

Besides, I don't see why each order of magnitude needs a separate article (and talk page - for example, this comment is probably not going to get appropriate attention on this page, since the problem is common to the related pages, but i couldn't guess where the more appropriate place would be). Why not make all these pages just be subsections of one article, "orders of magnitude (length)"?. ] (]) 02:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

== Dead link ==

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

* http://www.braincampaign.org/Pub/Pub_Main_Display.asp?LC_Docs_ID=2769
** In ] on 2011-06-09 12:30:18, HTTP Redirect Loop: -> -> ->
** In ] on 2011-06-20 03:35:39, HTTP Redirect Loop: -> -> ->

--] (]) 03:35, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:24, 17 January 2024

The contents of the 1 gigametre page were merged into Orders of magnitude (length) on 13 July 2016 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.
Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
This redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMeasurement (defunct)
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement
WikiProject iconLists Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Misplaced Pages. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

layout

the layout is really confusing: the heading "shorter than distance X" if followed by a list of entries that are greater than X, which makes no sense.

Besides, I don't see why each order of magnitude needs a separate article (and talk page - for example, this comment is probably not going to get appropriate attention on this page, since the problem is common to the related pages, but i couldn't guess where the more appropriate place would be). Why not make all these pages just be subsections of one article, "orders of magnitude (length)"?. Cesiumfrog (talk) 02:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:35, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Categories: