| Revision as of 00:38, 18 August 2005 editAlexR (talk | contribs)3,829 edits →[]← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:50, 9 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page. | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the VfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result of the debate was '''Nomination withdrawn'''. --] ] 05:45, 18 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Shes a god-fearing woman so shes not as bad as the other Jezebels but please, lets scare some sense into this lady by removing her from here and showing her the world disagrees with her hardcore pornographic lifetyle ] 12:21, 16 August 2005 (UTC) | <s>Shes a god-fearing woman so shes not as bad as the other Jezebels but please, lets scare some sense into this lady by removing her from here and showing her the world disagrees with her hardcore pornographic lifetyle ] 12:21, 16 August 2005 (UTC)</s> | ||
| *'''Speedy keep''' Clueless newbie nomination. --] ] 13:17, 16 August 2005 (UTC) | *'''Speedy keep''' Clueless newbie nomination. --] ] 13:17, 16 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| Line 6: | Line 12: | ||
| *'''Keep'''. For someone who clains to be so shocked by these entries, ] seems to be spending an awfully long time trawling through Misplaced Pages looking for similiar entries and then demanding their deletion. Is this what you get off on, ] ? You want to be careful, you may find your eye-sight affected. ] 13:51, 16 August 2005 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. For someone who clains to be so shocked by these entries, ] seems to be spending an awfully long time trawling through Misplaced Pages looking for similiar entries and then demanding their deletion. Is this what you get off on, ] ? You want to be careful, you may find your eye-sight affected. ] 13:51, 16 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' As with the above. A sense of decency is not incompatible with the five pillars of Misplaced Pages. No-one needs this information ] 15:05, 16 August 2005 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' As with the above. A sense of decency is not incompatible with the five pillars of Misplaced Pages. No-one needs this information ] 15:05, 16 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep'''. ] 15:21, August 16, 2005 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. ] 15:21, August 16, 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' — I find such bible-thumping censorship attempts to be rather offensive. >:-> — ] 15:44, 16 August 2005 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' — I find such bible-thumping censorship attempts to be rather offensive. >:-> — ] 15:44, 16 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy keep'''... how many more big-bust models am I going to have to look at today? Dang. --] 16:18, 16 August 2005 (UTC) | *'''Speedy keep'''... how many more big-bust models am I going to have to look at today? Dang. --] 16:18, 16 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| Line 22: | Line 28: | ||
| *I agree with the previously mentioned '''keep and ban''' ] 00:32, August 18, 2005 (UTC) | *I agree with the previously mentioned '''keep and ban''' ] 00:32, August 18, 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' Misplaced Pages is not for "scaring sense" into people, and hey, if "the world" really would disagree with her lifestyle, I guess her flicks wouldn't sell so well. -- ] 00:38, 18 August 2005 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' Misplaced Pages is not for "scaring sense" into people, and hey, if "the world" really would disagree with her lifestyle, I guess her flicks wouldn't sell so well. -- ] 00:38, 18 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| Due to recent developments and new knowledge on SaRenna Lee after feverish research I have withdrawn my VfD claim, this VfD is now OVER, concensus to '''Delete''' but changed to '''Keep''' at behest of initatior. -] 03:16, 18 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep''' ... probably an unneeded vote, but one for the record anyway. ] 03:21, 18 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep'''. I see nothing wrong with this. ] | ] 05:03, 18 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> | |||
Latest revision as of 02:50, 9 February 2023
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Nomination withdrawn. --Ryan Delaney 05:45, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
SaRenna Lee
Shes a god-fearing woman so shes not as bad as the other Jezebels but please, lets scare some sense into this lady by removing her from here and showing her the world disagrees with her hardcore pornographic lifetyle DavidsCrusader 12:21, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Clueless newbie nomination. --Ryan Delaney 13:17, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. DavidsCrusader seems to be going through List_of_big-bust_models_and_performers and putting up VfDs for all of them. --GraemeL
- Keep. For someone who clains to be so shocked by these entries, DavidsCrusader seems to be spending an awfully long time trawling through Misplaced Pages looking for similiar entries and then demanding their deletion. Is this what you get off on, DavidsCrusader ? You want to be careful, you may find your eye-sight affected. Markb 13:51, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete As with the above. A sense of decency is not incompatible with the five pillars of Misplaced Pages. No-one needs this information Bhoeble 15:05, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. tregoweth 15:21, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep — I find such bible-thumping censorship attempts to be rather offensive. >:-> — RJH 15:44, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy keep... how many more big-bust models am I going to have to look at today? Dang. --Howcheng 16:18, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Sliggy 17:28, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and ban. Don't you guys know a troll when you see one? -HX
- Keep User:Pirate2000. No reason to delete something just because it offends people.
- Keep, this VfD was made in bad faith by a religious troll. He's never posted before except to delete this and other like entries.Gateman1997 22:28, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep the article and nominate this VfD for BJAODN. --Tony Sidaway 00:16, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep notable and not obscene. --Noitall 00:41, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep sigh! Lectonar 05:59, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Good WP:FAITH is assumed but nominator does not appear to understand the criteria for VfD. Hall Monitor 17:13, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep I'd like to vote delete because her bleached blonde hair is so unappealing, but that's not how Misplaced Pages works. It's an encyclopaedic entry. Keep it. Don't be so scared of breasts. KeithD (talk) 20:28, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- Oh dear god. Keep, absolutely invalid reason for nomination. CanadianCaesar 23:52, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- I agree with the previously mentioned keep and ban DreamGuy 00:32, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Misplaced Pages is not for "scaring sense" into people, and hey, if "the world" really would disagree with her lifestyle, I guess her flicks wouldn't sell so well. -- AlexR 00:38, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
Due to recent developments and new knowledge on SaRenna Lee after feverish research I have withdrawn my VfD claim, this VfD is now OVER, concensus to Delete but changed to Keep at behest of initatior. -DavidsCrusader 03:16, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep ... probably an unneeded vote, but one for the record anyway. 23skidoo 03:21, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. I see nothing wrong with this. — JIP | Talk 05:03, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.