Revision as of 20:57, 15 May 2008 editSheffieldSteel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,979 edits →Hey: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:16, 15 January 2024 edit undoHouseBlaster (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators58,589 edits fix date | ||
(232 intermediate revisions by 79 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Not around|date=27 March 2023}} | |||
<font face="Verdana"> | |||
{{Archive box|image=]|box-width=10em|<center>] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]</center>}} | |||
] | |||
{{-}} | |||
== |
== wow == | ||
Talk about a blast from the past, is a name I haven't seen in a very long time. How ya doin? — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 13:42, 26 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
Please stop trying to delete the evidence of why this user is banned. He has been conducting an offsite campaign recruiting and directing meatpuppets from WikipediaReview to act on his behalf since he is banned which has resulted in much disruption of Misplaced Pages. Your actions on his user page are not helpful, and can be taken to be acting on his account as well since there's 5500+ other banned users who's user pages you are not trying to whitewash. Again, please to be more helpful. ] (]) 14:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Very well. How are you? ] ] 04:45, 10 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
:Can you reblock him whilst you're at it please? I'm not too sure what duration you're going to set, but I'd suggest nothing less than indef. ] 14:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::: Made it through another birthday, and I bitch about my health - but every day above ground eh? I miss seeing you around buddy. Hmmmm ... think maybe I might have you on Facebook, but I don't really do that too often anymore either. Anyway - it was really great seeing your sig pop up .. blast from the past and all that. You thinking of getting back to editing here? It'd be great to work with you again. MZM is still around. Lara's been busy IRL. Not sure how many of the old BRC are still hangin in there .. Evula is. Anyway .. I'm just violating the crap outta ] here, but good to touch base with you. — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 19:11, 11 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
::I've reinstated the community ban, which was indef. Since his plea to be heard about unblocking was rejected by the arbcom, I'm wondering what justification in policy The undertow has for his unilateral unblock of Moulton. ] (]) 14:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Can you please link me to the community ban? ''']''']''']''' 15:21, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::Background info found linked from ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 15:23, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::I read that. Where's this community ban FM referred to? ''']''']''']''' 15:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::Ok, if you're going to play wikilawyer Lara, where's the discussion with the blocking admin? ] discussion clearly supports the block. ] 15:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Yes, six people. Silly me. No wait, that's what I was talking about. ''']''']''']''' 17:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::::More to the point, all of Arbcom who voiced an opinion supported the block, and declined even looking at unblocking, due to the Rfc and how the request was framed (making it clear Moulton had not changed his approach a bit.) ]<sup>]</sup> 15:37, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::::As his current meatpuppetry campaign confirms. ] (]) 15:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
I agree with FM's comment above. Moulton was banned for good cause, and the arbcom saw no reason to change that. ] (]) 15:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::::I'm not endorsing the_undertow's action, I'm just asking where the community ban is. ''']''']''']''' 15:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Its an odd thing about vandalism - the vandal rarely labels it "vandalism". Just so, sarcasm rarely comes with a label "Sarcasm". And community bans don't come with big neon labels so you can read the words "Community ban". Read the linked Rfc, ANI, and ArbCom replies, and the block log. The sum of those items '''''IS''''' the community ban. I thought you were brighter than this, Lara. Are you having a bad day? ]<sup>]</sup> 15:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::I haven't read the Arb case yet, but the rest is unimpressive, especially considering other editors have been unblocked that were way more disruptive than Moulton. Let me read over it. And no, I'm not having a bad day, but thanks for asking. ''']''']''']''' 17:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave. --] (]) 05:06, 3 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
== File:Wales on millionaire.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
: I am disquieted by your deletion of ] just after consensus had been reached in the MfD; in your deletion comment you implicitly cite the "Right to Vanish", though obviously you'll be aware that this doesn't apply to persistent users who have been banned. Either way, I think it was a mistake to ignore consensus in this way, and it seems to me (from a brief reading) that your actions and general point of view in the matter put you in a conflict of interest. | |||
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 15:49, 30 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
: Consequently, I am minded to undo your deletion and restore the page to the consensus-agreed page. I would appreciate some feedback on this (I may well have missed some obvious point, for example), as I don't like to undo the actions of fellow sysops. | |||
:Thanks. I went ahead and explained why I do not agree with your rationale, as the file I uploaded is superior in quality and relevance, compared to the file you feel I have duplicated. ] ] 16:02, 30 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
: ] ] 19:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
== File:DramaOut.png listed for deletion == | |||
::I do think it was a bad move to delete it at this point, but <s>it's unclear how "a consensus had been reached in the MFD" - it's not been open four hours, and there are clearly people stating opinions in both directions. </s> you were talking about the compromise --] (]) 20:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 20:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::I gave a lot of thought to what was said before, but I must say that pretty much it's all the suck. And if you weren't so busy fucking sniping on my contribs, this dood, who had a shitty 'banning' would have been able to edit with guidelines. When the fuck will people here learn to fucking let shit go. There's a whole world out there guys. I'm serious. You can go fuck, maybe get a degree and perhaps even cyber with some 'chick' on a webcam for a mere 50 bucks. Instead, you decide to snipe on what I do, in hopes that what? You think that 127 blocks will get you laid faster than me? Fucking realize that this is a hobby. You are not paid. Go fucking make a difference by donating blood and not tagging articles for speedy deletion. In the end, you have nothing left but memories. And you better pray to God right now that your memories don't consist of AfD, nor RfC, nor ANI, but perhaps the time you left the house and fucking had a drink. ] ] 20:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::Whoa, the undertow. I think you may need to take a breath. I've only briefly looked into the Moltoun thing, and I think I would tend towards agreeing with you, but this is a bit over the top. Please rethink what you wrote. Mahalo. --] 20:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
::::Its a hobby that people care about, with a goal that people believe in. It sounds like you are the one taking this too seriously. There is no inalienable right to edit Misplaced Pages - there are many other useful things Moulton can do with his time if is he unable to edit here. This hobby is a shared one, and maintains itself through (in this case relatively simple) rules and the good will of its members. Sorry to butt in, but I think you do a disservice to the folks involved in this sort of thing and the various elements of Misplaced Pages by your comments. If Misplaced Pages is so unworthy to you, and so disturbing to your equilibrium, there are other hobbies. ]] 20:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
:I find that above response from you completely unacceptable and have therefore asked for opinions on AN/I. Please see ]. ] 20:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692007949 --> | |||
== Proposed deletion of 88 Precepts == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
:: OK, I'll take this as tacit approval. Thanks. | |||
:'''Not notable''' | |||
:: ] ] 21:10, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
:::His poorly worded point is that there are certain editors here who apparently have nothing better to do than hold grudges against others. What he so boldly stated (as I read it) was their time would be better spent out in the world rather than forcing their decision on everyone else like their community of six means something. What he didn't point out is that there's a group of editors in this project that appear to some to have an unruly amount of power, and also that if he'd teamed up with another powerful admin and created some sort of mentorship draft and gone before the community with his intentions, he could have successfully unblocked Moulton, regardless of the community's feelings on it, as was done with ]. ''']''']''']''' 01:07, 15 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
::The "community ban" was instigated by a member of http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:WikiProject_intelligent_design and supported by some of those members (Baegis seems to be a puppet of one of those, that focused primarily on following Moulton around it seems... You can see the in the first 40+ edits or so) The interesting thing is that Moulton at that time was debating with that crowd about several BLP's that they had slanted (in moulton's view). So I see an admin banning someone that they didn't agree with and then being supported by "his" crowd, so that it could be called a community ban. I did not know Misplaced Pages had so few members so that 6 counts as valid support by the community. (As a side note, the ID crowd can be seen "vote stacking" in several different areas: RFA's, content discussions, RFD etc. quite interesting) ] (]) 07:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::It wasn't a community ban, it was bullshit. the_undertow had every right to lift the block. Should he have discussed it somewhere first? Ideally. But this little Trifecta that popped up had no right to respond the way they did, and what it's escalated into is ridiculous. I agree with your assessment and my time here now will be spent investigating it. ''']''']''']''' 12:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 21:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
==Comments by LaraLove== | |||
==] nomination of ]== | |||
(moved from thread above as off-topic and confusing) | |||
] | |||
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not ] how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about ]. | |||
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 23:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::Did he forget to do the customary AN/I thread where he waits a few hours and then unblocks after no consensus is reached based on his subpage with a mentorship plan? Damn... you should write a guide on that, Ryan. But it's good to see that Moulton is reblocked now, right? But only for indef? Why not longer, as Ryan hoped... how long would longer than indef be? ''']''']''']''' 14:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:3rd eye (Tool song - sample).ogg== | |||
::::"He" who, Lara? He Ryan? Your entire post seems to be a snide comment on Ryan, which normally I'd be sympathetic with, but in the middle of this rather serious situation regarding The undertow's actions, serves only to confuse and belittle the issues. I'd appreciate if you'd move your comment to Ryan's page so as to keep this thread for the main topic at hand - thanks in advance. ]<sup>]</sup> 15:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
:::::''"how long would longer than indef be?"'' Indef implies a chance to return, hence for infinity would be longer. :) ]<sup>]</sup> 19:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::Actually, there is no correct answer. As indefinite is no set amount of time, you can't specify a greater length of time. That's what I was facetiously pointing out before everything went batshit crazy. ''']''']''']''' 00:11, 15 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::Spring fever, maybe? Oh, and my kids had Toy Story on when I typed that and I almost wrote "for infinity and beyond". Darned kids' movies. :) ]<sup>]</sup> 18:44, 15 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:22, 23 May 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Why we can't not be sober on this issue == | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:ArenaUrbanJungle.jpg== | |||
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:19, 9 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
Hi, | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Pink Dot logo.png== | |||
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:26, 23 June 2018 (UTC) | |||
It seems you have stepped on a mine. I once did something very similar, but on a much smaller scale. I think I proposed some edits on ] that had previously been proposed by a certain banned user, and well I was totally perplexed by the reaction and also went almost crazy; I know it's not easy to stay sober when basically out of nothing it seems all the world suddenly turns against you; but take it easy and don't take it personally, this Moulton guy seems like a really really disruptive troublemaker. I don't know the full history, and neither do you seem to know it, so please don't fight this fight, and maybe we can just start this over. | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Dicks logo.jpg== | |||
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:32, 20 December 2018 (UTC) | |||
Best wishes, ] (]) 21:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
:I appreciate the sentiment. It's nice to know that others are willing to empathize. But let it just play out naturally. There are 3 sides to every story, and not everyone is going to agree with the side I have taken. In the interim, I put my complete faith in the system, and if they deem that I have fought the wrong fight, then I lose. It's simply a gamble. And again, your words are greatly appreciated. ] ] 21:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
<blockquote>Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.</blockquote> | |||
::There may be 3 sides to every story, but when you remain silent, we don't get to see/hear it. Sorry, but that's just stupid. People are willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, but your attitude/response is making it hard to do so.] (]) 21:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:It almost seems like you're endorsing that articles will be OWNed and that that's just the way it is. I hope not - why should anyone be spanked for daring to tread on what a group have decided. I read elsewhere on this page that the people who're at the very center of this dispute took themselves to equal 'community', too, and are now protesting the unblocking of what they had decided. Not so sure this should just be "move along"ed from. ] (]) 23:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:: I apologize for that tone, of course people should fight for what they believe in, but I wanted to share my experience and express some sympathy. I only wished to say what I could so that the wonderful people at Wikiproject Tool, and the rest of us at Misplaced Pages, wouldn't lose a valuable editor because he got caught up in some stupid fight. If the fight is not stupid, then by all means fight it. I'm simply not a judge of that, but I think he needed to hear something like the above when everyone was attacking him. I meant it more as emotional support than actual advice on what is the Right Thing. Given that I'm terrible with emotions, I think that for once, I did it quite well, don't you think? :D ] (]) 23:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
==Request for arbitration== | |||
I have filed a request for arbitration based on your recent actions. See http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#The_undertow ] (]) 21:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
: Oh, no, and there is an arbcom filing against Cla68!!! This has to be one of the saddest day in the history of Misplaced Pages. I'm not siding with anyone here, but this is going to mean big fights between many editors that I respect on both sides. :( :( ] (]) 21:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 18:52, 14 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
::I am aware of the arbitration request and have the utmost respect that this situation will be dealt with godspeed. I should point out that 3rd party communications are of no value, as Misplaced Pages does not entertain off-site behavior. That being said, I will gladly adhere to whatever outcome ARBCOM decides, because after 11,000 edits, and numerous administrative actions, I believe in the system that I have given my free time to. Thank you. ] ] 22:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago == | |||
== WP:CIVIL warning == | |||
{{User QAIbox | |||
| title = Awesome | |||
| image = Cscr-featured.svg | |||
| image_upright = 0.35 | |||
| bold = ] | |||
}} | |||
--] (]) 05:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC) | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Tool - Undertow.ogg== | |||
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:34, 20 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
was a violation of ]. Keep it up and I'll take a personal interest in seeing that you are prevented from making one again. ] (]) 22:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:I personally view this as somewhat trolling. I get the impression that you are ''trying'' to get the_undertow to make another personal attack. I view this as a personal threat in ways. I feel that a Warning Template instead of personal message should have been used. This is entirely my opinion. <b>] ] ]</b> 22:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Good grief, a template would have violated ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 22:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::I wasn't familiar with this essay, but the fact is that it is an essay and not a policy. I just feel that the choice words used were interpereted by me as trolling, and either a template, or a different choice of words would work better. <b>] ] ]</b> 23:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Which is why we have AGF - please try to apply it, rather than suggest templating. ]<sup>]</sup> 15:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
:He made it personal. That was inappropriate. But, indeed, we don't template the regulars. ''']''']''']''' 16:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Topgun2.jpg== | |||
==Crowley== | |||
] | |||
I hope that you are not labelled a ], and are not cast irretrievably into the Abyss. :) ]</font></b> ]</font></b> 01:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by ]. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from ] is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an ]; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. | |||
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with ]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-disputed fair use rationale-notice --> -- ] (]) 21:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
== De-sysoping. == | |||
== The Racing Madness Wiki == | |||
Hey. | |||
I'm an admin for the Racing Madness Wiki, a FANDOM site that covers all info on the Racing Madness games, https://racingmadness.fandom.com/Home. Anybody who is interested can hop aboard! {{User|Mountain4567}} ] (]) 22:37, 15 March 2023 (UTC) ] (]) 22:53, 15 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
Per your agreement, which , a Steward has removed your sysop right. | |||
Yours, | |||
] ] 20:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Hey == | |||
I get the impression that you are going through some serious shit right now in real life. I just wanted to say that I hope it gets better. <font color="006622">]</font><sup><small><b>]</b></small></sup> 20:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 03:16, 15 January 2024
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. The undertow has not edited Misplaced Pages since 27 March 2023. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
wow
Talk about a blast from the past, there is a name I haven't seen in a very long time. How ya doin? — Ched : ? 13:42, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Very well. How are you? the_undertow 04:45, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- Made it through another birthday, and I bitch about my health - but every day above ground eh? I miss seeing you around buddy. Hmmmm ... think maybe I might have you on Facebook, but I don't really do that too often anymore either. Anyway - it was really great seeing your sig pop up .. blast from the past and all that. You thinking of getting back to editing here? It'd be great to work with you again. MZM is still around. Lara's been busy IRL. Not sure how many of the old BRC are still hangin in there .. Evula is. Anyway .. I'm just violating the crap outta WP:NOTSOCIAL here, but good to touch base with you. — Ched : ? 19:11, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- Very well. How are you? the_undertow 04:45, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:06, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Wales on millionaire.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wales on millionaire.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. AldezD (talk) 15:49, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. I went ahead and explained why I do not agree with your rationale, as the file I uploaded is superior in quality and relevance, compared to the file you feel I have duplicated. the_undertow 16:02, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
File:DramaOut.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DramaOut.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of 88 Precepts
The article 88 Precepts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not notable
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 21:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 88 Precepts
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on 88 Precepts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dave Dial (talk) 23:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:3rd eye (Tool song - sample).ogg
Thanks for uploading File:3rd eye (Tool song - sample).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ArenaUrbanJungle.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ArenaUrbanJungle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Pink Dot logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Pink Dot logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Dicks logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dicks logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of File:DramaOut.png
The file File:DramaOut.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 18:52, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
Ten years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Tool - Undertow.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Tool - Undertow.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Topgun2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Topgun2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Misplaced Pages:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:28, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
The Racing Madness Wiki
I'm an admin for the Racing Madness Wiki, a FANDOM site that covers all info on the Racing Madness games, https://racingmadness.fandom.com/Home. Anybody who is interested can hop aboard! Mountain4567 (talk · contribs) 71.178.26.30 (talk) 22:37, 15 March 2023 (UTC) 71.178.26.30 (talk) 22:53, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Categories: