| Revision as of 20:52, 19 August 2005 editNicodemus75 (talk | contribs)1,695 edits →[]← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:13, 31 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page. | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the VfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result of the debate was | |||
| '''speedy keep''' as bad faith nomination... article has already survived a VFD and abusive behaviour from nominator suggests a troll. ] 21:45, 19 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Line 4: | Line 11: | ||
| *'''Keep'''. Not any less encyclopedic than other forms of ]. - ] | *'''Keep'''. Not any less encyclopedic than other forms of ]. - ] | ||
| *'''Keep'''. As per ]. Also a well written article. I suspect this VfD is a shill for censoring the content. --] 20:52, 19 August 2005 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. As per ]. Also a well written article. I suspect this VfD is a shill for censoring the content. --] 20:52, 19 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :: Don't give me any of that gay rights feces. Masturbation involving the anus is far outside the mainstream. ] | |||
| :::It's not necessarily a homosexual activity (indeed, by the definition it need only involve one person). Oh, and '''speedy keep''' as a bad-faith nomination. ] ] 21:16, August 19, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::: We're not interested in your irrelevant and inane speculations. Vote on the subject, or shut the fuck up. ] | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> | |||
Latest revision as of 08:13, 31 March 2022
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy keep as bad faith nomination... article has already survived a VFD and abusive behaviour from nominator suggests a troll. FCYTravis 21:45, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
Anal masturbation
Fringe activity. Article non-encylopedic. Erwin Walsh
- Keep. Not any less encyclopedic than other forms of masturbation. - Thatdog
- Keep. As per Thatdog. Also a well written article. I suspect this VfD is a shill for censoring the content. --Nicodemus75 20:52, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
- Don't give me any of that gay rights feces. Masturbation involving the anus is far outside the mainstream. Erwin Walsh
- It's not necessarily a homosexual activity (indeed, by the definition it need only involve one person). Oh, and speedy keep as a bad-faith nomination. Meelar (talk) 21:16, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
- We're not interested in your irrelevant and inane speculations. Vote on the subject, or shut the fuck up. Erwin Walsh
- It's not necessarily a homosexual activity (indeed, by the definition it need only involve one person). Oh, and speedy keep as a bad-faith nomination. Meelar (talk) 21:16, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Don't give me any of that gay rights feces. Masturbation involving the anus is far outside the mainstream. Erwin Walsh
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.