| Revision as of 00:37, 22 August 2005 editSleepnomore (talk | contribs)610 edits One more attempt← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:11, 16 July 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)Tag: AWB | ||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{ |
{{Blanked IP talk}} | ||
| {{test2}} - ]]] 21:58, 19 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| {{anon}} | |||
| {{sign}} ] 06:30, 24 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Ted Kennedy == | |||
| "Surrogate father" doesn't necessarily mean biological father...maybe a different term should be used, but I think it only means to say that he was close to his nieces and nephews. Thus, I reverted your edit. --- ] 04:47, 6 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Also, "witnessed" the assassination is loose language, but I'm sure they meant "went through" rather than "saw personally"...you can change the phrasing to that if you think it's clearer. --- ] 04:49, 6 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| It is inappropriate to report a dispute over content as vandalism. If you wish other editors to become involved in a content discussion, please use ]. ] 20:04, 6 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ===Incorrect references to vandalism=== | |||
| Your attention is called to Gamaliel's statement on 6 August that it is incorrect to report a dispute over content as vandalism. It is similarly incorrect to indicate in an edit summary that deletion of material whose value is questioned is vandalism. ] 15:44, 14 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == It Helps to Create an Account == | |||
| There have been some edits from this IP address that may be reasonable but may be unreasonable. I am not making a judgment. | |||
| If anyone has been editing from this address on a subject other than ], it might be a good idea to create an account in case this address is blocked. ] 03:14, 8 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Three revert rule == | |||
| Please adhere to the ]. The rule applies to users, not accounts or IP addresses, so using another IP address to make additional reverts is not permitted. ] 16:24, 14 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Do not alter the statement of the dispute again. You are free to respond in your own section at length, but if you forge or alter the comments of others again you will be blocked for vandalism. ] 01:21, 18 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Read and follow the format and instructions of the RfC. It is not your sandbox and you are not free to spew your rants all over it. You are free to write whatever you want if you stay within the perscribed format and put unrelated material on the talk page. It is not that difficult to understand. Just color inside the lines. ] 03:39, 18 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Create a Signed-In Account == | |||
| This IP address is apparently being used by an ]. If anyone is using this IP address to make constructive edits to Misplaced Pages, they may consider creating a signed-in account so that they will not be blocked if the troll is disruptive. ] 15:29, 18 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Please See Request for Comments == | |||
| A ] has been posted concerning a user of this address. ] 16:45, 20 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ===To any other users of this address=== | |||
| If anyone is using this address who is not the subject of the conduct described in the RfC, please consider creating an account so as not to be blocked. ] 16:45, 20 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Did someone put ] in charge while I was sleeping? Where is rule that says others can't login from the same IP address? Also the vote is overwhelming in the RfC, so why would anyone be blocked?--] 12:32, 21 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Please Stop == | |||
| I'm trying to tone down the rhetoric. Keeping RFCs on the page are not neccessary. Please use user talk pages for personal discussion and RfC announcements. I would like to keep the article talk page to discuss the article -- not users. Thanks for your help. You only strengthen your opinion by cooperating and helping out. Thanks in advance - ] 22:55, August 21, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == One more attempt == | |||
| I understand your idea here, but it really isn't acceptable. That isn't what the article talk pages are used for. I don't hold a real opinion on these pages other than the disputes are out of control. I did provide feedback which stated that I am in favor of keeping controversial material in there. The point is, you can't expect to be taken serious when you are arguing minor points and making waves where they aren't neccessary. Leave your arguments on a point by point basis and make them refute them. That's the only way you are going to win -- not with continued dispute over where the RfC's are announced. I'm not telling you to drop the RfC. That's up to you. I'm telling you to keep it to talk pages. I'm not a policeman of the sites, I'm simply trying to make this article work for everyone and we can't come to an agreement while this bickering goes on around article discussion. Common man. This really is pettty and you know it. Don't let them get to you and bring you to their level. = ] 00:37, August 22, 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:11, 16 July 2022
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.