Misplaced Pages

User talk:Irishpunktom: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:19, 23 August 2005 editJayjg (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators134,922 edits 3RR at []: about to his submit← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:07, 6 February 2024 edit undoأنون (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users567 edits Nomination of Shaykh Muhammad Sarwar for deletion: new sectionTag: New topic 
(946 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{not around|3=1 October 2013}}
]
==Dispute on FGC==
Hi. I am having a dispute with a user on ]. I noticed your previous contribution and hoped you might provide some third-party commentary on a dispute at ]. Your opinion would be greatly appreciated. Thank You. ] (]) 01:46, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Coldastheclay.jpg==
== new vfd ==
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at ] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.


If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] (]) 20:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
The prior VFD that you voted at ended with no consensus, a new VFD has been opened at ]. ] 18:45, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
==VfD pollution ==
] enlisted Persecution by Muslims for VfD again, just 24 hours after the article withstood the first VfD. You might be interested to watch it. --] (] | ] ]) 10:50, 30 July 2005 (UTC)


==Slave trade==


==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Expressveil.gif==
It seems that Guy Montag and Jayjg have blindly reverted our edits at that article.] 17:17, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at ] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
:Blindly? I examined every edit you made; none benefitted the article. As for Tom's edits, they're still in the article. ]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></sup> 17:20, 3 August 2005 (UTC)


If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] (]) 21:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
==Dispute with an admin==


Hi,


==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PicofJlarkin.jpeg==
I have a complaint against ], an administrator. Basically, he violated the blocking policy, by blocking me (for 72 hours) after I made 2 reverts, claiming I had broken the 3RR policy listing 4 reverts - , , , - however, none of these cover a period over 24 hours. At the time of the fourth revert listed, there was only 1 prior revert in the prior 24 hours. This is also true for the time of the 3rd revert listed.
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by ]. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an ]; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.


If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our ]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] (]) 14:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I accused UnivitedCompany of breaking the blocking policy, and UnivitedCompany openly admitted doing so - . I also accused UninvitedCompany of blocking me because he/she has an anti-Islamic POV and didn't like the fact that I was opposing anti-Islamic POV pushers, UninvitedCompany replied admitting that they have an .


== AfD ==
I don't feel this is appropriate behaviour for an administrator - violating blocking policy, and reinterpreting 3RR as 1RR, simply to punish people whose opinions they disagree with, isn't really something that should be permissable. Several administrators have already stated that the block was probably inappropriate (and none have supported UninvitedCompany's stance), but they seem unwilling to become involved (possibly due to UninvitedCompany's status as a longstanding admin (which UninvitedCompany claims makes him a "senior administrator", a post which simply does not exist), not that a cabal exists).


Hi. You commented on a previous AfD debate on the article ]. There is a new AfD ]. Regards, ]<sup>]</sup> 05:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
I would like to raise an RFC over the matter, but I need a co-signatory to do so, so I was wondering if you would be able to look into the matter.




==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Atwar bahjat.jpg}==
Thanks,
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by ]. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an ] linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
:* That there is a ] on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
:* That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an ]; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.


If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our ]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. ] (]) 11:37, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
-Ril-


== Miraj.jpg ==
] ( ] | ] | ] ) 14:30, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
----


Hi, would you please tell me the reference of this picture :, We in fa.wiki want to make an article and we need the complete information about this picture. thankx
Thanks - ]
--] (]) 21:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)


==Proposed deletion of Zachariah Blanton==
] ( ] | ] | ] ) 16:11, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
]
A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
:<b>Convicted murderer of no significant or lasting notability; now amounts to a BLP violation as references are all dead links.</b>


All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ].
== source ==


Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 19:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Do you have a source for ?
*** ] (during an interview with General Ouze Merham in 1956) "I vow that I’ll burn every Palestinian child (that) will be born in this area. The Palestinian women and child is more dangerous than the man, because the Palestinian child’s existence infers that generations will go on, but the man causes limited danger. I vow that if I was just an Israeli civilian and I met a Palestinian I would burn him and I would make him suffer before killing him. With one hit I've killed 750 Palestinians (in Rafah in 1956). I wanted to encourage my soldiers by raping Arabic girls as the Palestinian woman is a slave for Jews, and we do whatever we want to her and nobody tells us what we shall do but we tell others what they shall do"
--]\<sup>]</sup> 14:30, August 10, 2005 (UTC)


== Regarding Image Muhammad_callig.gif ==
#
This is regarding your uploaded image ]. As per the Muslim viewpoint, the name of Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) must always include the honorifics 'Peace Be Upon Him' in English or 'sallAllahu `alayhi wa sallam' in Arabic. Your image has none. This image could be acceptable as an image depicting the word 'Muhammed' but certainly cannot refer to Prophet Muhammed (pbuh). The concern I have is that this image is used in template { {Muhammad} } everywhere on Misplaced Pages. Request you to please upload an image with the honorifics included. Thanks ] (]) 13:35, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
#
# (very POV website)
# (guardian newspaper)
#
#
#
#
# (Daily Mirror (not the UK newspaper, but one from elsewhere))
# (Annual Islamophobia awards (UK)) - '''this is where I first got it from'''
#
# (Palestine chronicle)


==Unreferenced BLPs==
] ( ] | ] | ] ) 14:49, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
] Hello Irishpunktom! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''2''' of the articles that you created are tagged as]. Please note that all biographies of living persons '''must be sourced'''. If you were to add ], ] ] to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:


# ] - <small>{{findsources|Muhammad Shaykh Sarwar}}</small>
:Why are these all using Google cache? And why are you quoting reader ''comments'' (ala a comment in the Guardian blog) as verifiable?! Absurd. - ] 01:13, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
# ] - <small>{{findsources|Svat Soucek}}</small>
Thanks!--] (]) 23:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


==] of ]==
::The quote is actually taken from a fictional work ''In the Land of Israel'' by ], and has been attributed on propaganda sites to Sharon. It's a well-known hoax. See ]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></sup> 01:21, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
]


The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
:See ]. Cheers, ] <sup>]</font></sup> 03:01, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
:<b>Non-notable author. No evidence of notability given, and a Google search finds only directory listings, no significant coverage in reliable sources.</b>


While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].
== Three-revert rule violation ==


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
You have been blocked for 24 hours for violating the ] on ]. --] 07:17, 12 August 2005 (UTC)


Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 02:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
*Ill take a look :) --] 19:39, 15 August 2005 (UTC)


==File source problem with File:Pilgrimschaucer.gif==
== Al-Andalus ==
]
If shows the revert war then I would say this... haven should definitely not be linked to as it has no useful definition pertinent to what it's being linked for. I would also remove haven... which seems to be the main point of contention. I wouldn't mind saying that they were "quite tolerant"... I would also remove that source... it's on an orthopedics page... so... not the most trustworthy... if it comes originally from a good source then you can link that. If there is a strong source that says the took in Jews and Sufis then I think "absorbing religious minorities persecuted in other lands, such as ]s and ]" would be fine using the other source. There is plenty linked about tolerance here. I would give up on that battle or compromise and find a source talking about how dhimmis didn't have to serve in the military... I know that's true in most doctrine... I don't know if this happened in Al-Andalus but if it's true it's notable. This may not have been the answer you wanted but... that's what I think about it all. ] ] 19:52, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.


If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created . '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''' per Misplaced Pages's ], ]. If the image is ] and ], '''the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC)''' per ] criterion ]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ] (]) 11:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
:Well, I'd cite that book about the Malis going as an example for that opening. I don't think haven is any simpler than saying "place of tolerance". I think something like that will suffice... I don't think it's something worth getting into an edit war over and I do see Jayjg's point... haven implies a lot... as if many were fleeing and all went there... I don't know... I personally don't think haven is too bad or implies too much more than place of tolerance.... maybe you'd prefer refuge... if that'd be allowed but I think that'd be the same problem as haven. ] ] 03:38, 16 August 2005 (UTC)


==Fair use rationale for File:Kamrams coins.jpg==
== hi ==
]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ] but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to ] and edit it to include a ].


If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ] (]) 17:44, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
First of all, its not "near the end of time", Shia started dissliking Umar from the very first, refer to Sahi Muslim to read that Ali And Ibn Abbas thought of Umar and Abu Bakr as liers, sinfull, treacherous and dishonest.
==Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Muslim history==


''']''', which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. —]❤]☮]☺]☯ 21:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
For the second part, Umar and Abu Bakr both abused and talked bad of other Sahaba, so if anything, im following their way.


== Image deletion notification ==
Third, in one hadith it is clear that Muhammad (as) did not regard Khalid ibn Walid as a Sahaba. So in Muhammads (as) view, not anyone was a sahaba.


FYI - I nominated an image you uploaded for deletion . ] (]) 18:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
--] 11:44, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
:assuming it was you commenting there as an IP, I asked a follow-up question. ] (]) 19:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
::I responded there, this time with a link to a page where the image was found four months before you uploaded it here.... Any explanation? ] (]) 20:29, 24 October 2011 (UTC)


== File:Marblearch.JPG listed for deletion ==
== Be aware ==
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 17:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up. It's something like that I would expect from him. Anyway, it's not much I can do about it, but to let the facts talk for themselves. Oh, I really don't like the "ganging up" mentality some people get. All I want to do is to do some edits and then get on with my life. I neither want not have the time to build up a gang to wage war. // ]
== File:Charteris.jpeg listed for deletion ==
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 17:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
==Non-free rationale for File:Plagge.JPG==
]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to ''']'''. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under ], but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to ], and edit it to include a ].


If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on ]. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no fair use rationale-notice --> ] (]) 00:30, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
== 3RR at ] ==
==Nominated for deletion (4th time)==
I'm trying to get this article deleted, ], please consider entering the discussion! ] (]) 16:06, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


== Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library! ==
Tom, by re-adding the phrase "noted for its tolerance, was a refuge for people fleeing oppression, such as Jews escaping", you've violated the 3RR at Al-Andalus. Moreover, since you have only provided examples of Jews, the phrase "such as Jews" is incorrect. I recommend you revert yourself before you are blocked. ]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></sup> 14:28, 23 August 2005 (UTC)


{|style="background:#CEE3F6; border:1px solid #cee3f6; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius: 8px;"
As I explained, you have reverted to the phrase "noted for its tolerance, was a refuge for people fleeing oppression, such as Jews escaping etc." 4 times now. The only example we have of it being a refuge is for Jews, no other peoples, therefore it is inaccurate, which is why I keep removing it. As well, the phrase "noted for its tolerance" is POV, and we have been disagreeing about that for weeks; it is disingenuous to now claim you don't understand why reverting to it is controversial. Please revert your 3RR violation, as I do not want to see you blocked. ]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></sup> 14:43, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
|-
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%;"|] Misplaced Pages Partnership - We need ''you!''
|-
|]
|Hi '''{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}ROOTPAGENAME}}'''! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the ], a project of the ] and ]. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Misplaced Pages using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate ]. Thanks for editing Misplaced Pages and I look forward to working with you! 14:21, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
|}
<!-- EdwardsBot 0531 -->


== An RfC that you ''may'' be interested in... ==
Right now I'd like you to revert your 3RR violation, as I'm about to fill out the 3RR report. We can talk about the exact wording of a new version on the Talk: page. ]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></sup> 15:12, 23 August 2005 (UTC)


As one of the previous contributors to {{Tl|Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a ] started on the talk page as to ]. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
I'm about to hit the submit button, Tom. Please re-consider this course of action. I'll give it a couple more minutes. ]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></sup> 15:19, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
: <small>This message was sent by ] (]) on behalf of <span class="nowrap">&#123;&#123;U&#124;]&#125;&#125;</span> <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Technical 13@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template:Infobox_film/list&oldid=598721132 -->
==Orphaned non-free image File:Veil Case Teacher.gif==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

== ] ==

{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691987405 -->

{{tb|Talk:Seljuk}}
== United NationsN listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''United NationsN'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> - ''']''' <sup>(]) (]) (]) </sup> 03:20, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

== Nomination for merging of ] ==
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (]) 09:24, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

== Nomination for merging of ] ==
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (]) 10:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 4#Heavy metal in Islamic countries}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 18:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 23:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:07, 6 February 2024

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Irishpunktom has not edited Misplaced Pages since 1 October 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Dispute on FGC

Hi. I am having a dispute with a user on FGC. I noticed your previous contribution and hoped you might provide some third-party commentary on a dispute at Blackworm’s objections. Your opinion would be greatly appreciated. Thank You. Phyesalis (talk) 01:46, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Coldastheclay.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Coldastheclay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Expressveil.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Expressveil.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PicofJlarkin.jpeg

Thank you for uploading Image:PicofJlarkin.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD

Hi. You commented on a previous AfD debate on the article Hattrick. There is a new AfD here. Regards, Bastun 05:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Atwar bahjat.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Atwar bahjat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:37, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Miraj.jpg

Hi, would you please tell me the reference of this picture :, We in fa.wiki want to make an article and we need the complete information about this picture. thankx --Achaemenian (talk) 21:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zachariah Blanton

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Zachariah Blanton, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Convicted murderer of no significant or lasting notability; now amounts to a BLP violation as references are all dead links.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jfire (talk) 19:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Regarding Image Muhammad_callig.gif

This is regarding your uploaded image File:Muhammad callig.gif. As per the Muslim viewpoint, the name of Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) must always include the honorifics 'Peace Be Upon Him' in English or 'sallAllahu `alayhi wa sallam' in Arabic. Your image has none. This image could be acceptable as an image depicting the word 'Muhammed' but certainly cannot refer to Prophet Muhammed (pbuh). The concern I have is that this image is used in template { {Muhammad} } everywhere on Misplaced Pages. Request you to please upload an image with the honorifics included. Thanks 'Abd el 'Azeez (talk) 13:35, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Irishpunktom! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Muhammad Shaykh Sarwar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Svat Soucek - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Muhammad Shaykh Sarwar

The article Muhammad Shaykh Sarwar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable author. No evidence of notability given, and a Google search finds only directory listings, no significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robofish (talk) 02:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Pilgrimschaucer.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Pilgrimschaucer.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Misplaced Pages's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Kamrams coins.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kamrams coins.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:44, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Muslim history

Category:Muslim history, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)TCM21:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Image deletion notification

FYI - I nominated an image you uploaded for deletion here. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

assuming it was you commenting there as an IP, I asked a follow-up question. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
I responded there, this time with a link to a page where the image was found four months before you uploaded it here.... Any explanation? Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:29, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Marblearch.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Marblearch.JPG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Charteris.jpeg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charteris.jpeg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Plagge.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Plagge.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:30, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Nominated for deletion (4th time)

I'm trying to get this article deleted, List of former atheists and agnostics, please consider entering the discussion! Ncboy2010 (talk) 16:06, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Misplaced Pages Partnership - We need you!
Hi Irishpunktom! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Misplaced Pages using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Misplaced Pages and I look forward to working with you! 14:21, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Veil Case Teacher.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Veil Case Teacher.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Irishpunktom. You have new messages at Talk:Seljuk.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

United NationsN listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect United NationsN. Since you had some involvement with the United NationsN redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION 03:20, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Islamic holidays

Template:Islamic holidays has been nominated for merging with Template:Eid. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 09:24, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Muslimmonths

Template:Muslimmonths has been nominated for merging with Template:Religious year in Islam. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 10:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

"Heavy metal in Islamic countries" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Heavy metal in Islamic countries has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 4 § Heavy metal in Islamic countries until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 18:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Shaykh Muhammad Sarwar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaykh Muhammad Sarwar is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Shaykh Muhammad Sarwar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lolekek (talk) 23:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Categories: