Revision as of 17:53, 23 August 2005 editSynaptidude (talk | contribs)491 edits →choice← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:49, 15 September 2016 edit undoAndy M. Wang (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users39,857 edits link corr. | ||
(47 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. | |||
==choice== | |||
If further archiving is needed, see ]. | |||
'''Previous discussions:''' | |||
Bensaccount, you said "I won't even bother any more" in your response. The point of this RFC isn't to run you off the articles so you no longer contribute. The point is to get you to contribute within NPOV policy. If you refuse to follow NPOV policy and stop contributing, that's your choice, but another option is to make your contributions so that they also follow policy. That's another choice available to you. It means you'll have to learn the policy and understand what you need to change to follow it, but it's a choice available to you if you choose it. ] 16:10, 22 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
*]: | |||
Bensaccount, I can understand why you are angry, but it saddens me to read this: | |||
*]: | |||
---- | |||
It is just too much work to constantly battle these POV pushers and their attempts to erode and twist NPOV. Why should I care if the Creation science article is misleading, anyways. I won't even bother any more. Bensaccount 04:47, 22 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Can you see that there is room to believe that some might think it is you pushing POV? |
Latest revision as of 01:49, 15 September 2016
Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Misplaced Pages:How to archive a talk page.
Previous discussions: