| Revision as of 16:32, 6 June 2008 editDaytrivia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers2,296 edits →Frances Seymour, Duchess of Somerset (1599-1674): new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:09, 7 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <span style="position:absolute;top:-37px;left:-180px;z-index:100">]</span> | |||
| <div style="padding: 0px; background: #FAF8EC; border-style: ridge; border-width: 3px; border-color: green;"> | <div style="padding: 0px; background: #FAF8EC; border-style: ridge; border-width: 3px; border-color: green;"> | ||
| <table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="2" style="background: white"> | <table cellspacing="4" cellpadding="2" style="background: white"> | ||
| <tr><td valign="top"><div style="background: #FAF8EC; border-style: ridge; border-width: 0px; border-color: orange; padding: 2em; font-family: |
<tr><td valign="top"><div style="background: #FAF8EC; border-style: ridge; border-width: 0px; border-color: orange; padding: 2em; font-family: trebuchet ms, sans-serif; font-size: 95%; text-align: justify;"> | ||
| {{Rollback}} | {{Rollback}} | ||
| {{User:Tothwolf/harassment-awareness|right=42|top=10}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = |
|maxarchivesize = 60K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 9 | ||
| |algo = old(48h) | |algo = old(48h) | ||
| |archive = User talk:BigDunc/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:BigDunc/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| <center><font face=arial size=6 color="green">Comments that I feel are unhelpful <B>will</B> be removed at my discretion.</font></td><BR></center><br> | |||
| {{userpage}} | |||
| <center></center><br> | |||
| </td></tr></table> | |||
| <table width="100%"> | <table width="100%"> | ||
| <tr bgcolor="green"> | <tr bgcolor="green"> | ||
| Line 20: | Line 16: | ||
| <center>'''Note: If you post a message here, I'll reply here for continuity. If I post a message on your talk page I will have put it on my watchlist, so you can reply there.'''</center></font> | <center>'''Note: If you post a message here, I'll reply here for continuity. If I post a message on your talk page I will have put it on my watchlist, so you can reply there.'''</center></font> | ||
| </td></tr></table> | </td></tr></table> | ||
| {| class="infobox" width="315px" | |||
| |- | |||
| ! align="left" | ]<br />] | |||
| <br> | |||
| |} | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines}} | |||
| == Happy Editing! == | |||
| {{retired}} | |||
| Random smile - happy editing! I hope this smile brightens your day! | |||
| ==What happened?== | |||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| I don't believe my eyes, Dunc! What has happened that made you put the retired template up?!!!!--] (]) 12:39, 15 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I hope your reasons are not health related. ] (]) 16:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| --<span style="border: 1px solid #00a5ff; ">]</span> <sup><i>] ] ]</i></sup> has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! <br /> <small>''Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.''</small> | |||
| </div><!-- Template:smile --> | |||
| == RfC on Community de-adminship == | |||
| You are receiving this message because you contributed to ] and have not participated at ] or been directly informed this RfC has opened. Please accept my apologies if you have been informed of and/or participated in the RfC already. | |||
| This RfC has opened and your comments are welcome and encouraged. Please visit ]. Thank you, --] (]) 16:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == The Wolf Hunter == | |||
| == Wikimedia Ireland == | |||
| I don't see how any one has a right to delete some ones work from here. Misplaced Pages is a Encyclopedia for people to gain knowledge about things in life, pop culture and things from around the world. The Wolf Hunter film it's self is a film that has lots of fans and supporters as does the character. I think just because its not as well known as Freddy or Jason does not mean it should not be on here. I have already seen that some one else has edited the article as well. I think that if this does go off its a shame and what kind of Encyclopedia for the people rob people from learning about films and characters from a independent film. | |||
| Hi, | |||
| --bloodline video 06:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Misplaced Pages has a guidline for articles called ] have a read of it. It is not to late to save the article if you can provide sources for it which are ] which are ] hope this helps you. <strong>]</strong>] 07:46, 30 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| A while back you added your name at ]. Well, it took a year (almost to the day) but ten editors have expressed an interest in starting a Wikimedia chapter in Ireland, which meets the criteria for a "critical mass". If you're still interested, I'd would be great if we could kick off discussion. Maybe, a first step might be to introduce ourselves (anonymously) at ] with some ideas about what a chapter could do or a sketch of your interest in founding one ... or even just say restate an interest and say 'hello' {{mono|:-)}} | |||
| == ] == | |||
| You may also be interested in joining the , if you are not already on it. --RA (]) 20:08, 20 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I suggest that you can delete almost futher unneccesary discussions, because it is 110 KB long and they end up having the dumbest arguments about image deletion. I can't stand scrolling all the way down, which is annoying and exhausting. ] (]) 12:38, 30 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==You are missed== | |||
| :Well as you say ''dont complain''. <strong>]</strong>] 12:39, 30 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Big Dunc, I wish you'd reconsider and come back into the Wikpedia fold. You are sorely missed here.--] (]) 10:27, 23 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
| All I can say, I just hope they realize that the GTA gang images are under . You might need to notify ] and ]. I, for one, can't break up their arguments without one of the admins' help. ] (]) 12:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Could you explain what you mean please? <strong>]</strong>] 12:44, 30 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Take a good look at , , and lastly, . I must warn you, that they are extremely large and must be deleted due to their unneccesary arguments. I did my best to break them up, but never worked, to no avail. ] (]) 12:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :i have put a Collapsible Box around the biggest part of it how is that? <strong>]</strong>] 13:06, 30 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == 1798 Rebellion == | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| I don't know if this is the right place to put this question - but I don't know what was controversial about what I wrote on the 1798 rebellion page. Thats what happened - isn't it? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :Have a read of ] for words to be avoided and how to write sentences might help, happy editing. <strong>]</strong>] 15:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| == {{User|BanditoLoco}} == | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Thanks for the heads up and great observation. Interesting comment posted by Bandit on ]. Care to take this sockpuppet/meatpuppet investigation further? I think that statement followed by initial edit vandalizing your page constitute confirmation of the sock relationship. I'm sure you have insight as to who the "many profiles" are. ] <small>(])</small> 19:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I will put a report on WP:SSP but i'm not aware off hand of the other accounts maybe ] is as the second edit they made was to that page. <strong>]</strong>] 19:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Hi BigDunc, thanks for your reversion of the vandalism. I don't recall having any contact with either of the two accounts you've given me details of so I suspect that there is another yet unknown sockpuppet which we have had contact with? Feel free to submit a report to ] and if they can't pick it up we can try ]. Thanks! Regards, <font face="Tahoma" size="2px">''']'''</font> <font size="1px"><sup>]</sup></font><font size="1px"><sub>]</sub></font> 20:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Apparently, the three of us are collaborating with some sinister plan. I know ], but I'm pretty sure you and I have not crossed paths before. Did you forget to invite me to the Secret Evil Plan meetings? I feel left out. -]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 21:06, 2 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Forgot to send out the memo that day ;) I have filed a sock report I came across WLU when he reverted UDACommander on my page. Maybe you might have more suspects to add to the list. <strong>]</strong>] 21:19, 2 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::As far as I can remember, those are the only ones I've noticed. At least now I know how we got to be in the same cabal; I guess we agreed that maybe a blatant vandal shouldn't be unblocked, even if he did make a dozen requests. How sinister of us. -]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 21:28, 2 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::We are very bad, you just cant win sometimes :) <strong>]</strong>] 21:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ] (]) 15:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==Northern Irish== | |||
| How is it that a person born in Northern Ireland is "not Northern Irish"? ] <sup>]</sup> 08:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :No offence but you obviously know nothing of Irish politics, they are NOT Northern Irish. <strong>]</strong>] 08:44, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::No, I most certainly do. Perhaps you don't realise it's not a political category. It's a birthplace category. Anyway, if you object so much to it on "political" grounds, then would not the sensible thing to do be to place the person in ] instead of the redundant ]? POV may be clouding your thinking, of course. ] <sup>]</sup> 08:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::It is not a birthplace category. ] is a birthplace category, that category is not a birthplace category. Please stop adding contentious categories to biographical articles, especially ones about living people. ] (]) 08:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Who says it's not? I created it; supposedly I could define it as a birthplace/escapee one. So, what about my other points? ] <sup>]</sup> 08:54, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I was not aware you had any other points, I do not see any that have any merit and are in need of addressing. I repeat, please stop adding contentious categories to biograhpical articles, especially ones about living people. The sensible thing to do would be to stop adding or creating offensive categories in the first place, such as claimimg Angelo Fusco is British based on your own conjecture. ] (]) 09:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Let me restate the point I made above, since you were unaware of it. If you disagree with this category, would not the sensible thing to do be to place the person in another category, (like ], e.g.) instead of the redundant ]? As for Angelo Fusco, you seemed to miss the point that the category in question identified the nationality of the granter of the pardon, not the nationality of the recipient. ] <sup>]</sup> 09:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I'm not sure where this discussion is coming from, but people born in Northern Ireland can be considered British, Irish, Northern Irish, even Ulstermen or Ulsterwomen. As the area is contested it's usually polite to refer to the person in the manner to which they'd wish to be referred.] (]) 09:36, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I think that's good advice, which is why I would suggest changing the category to the appropriate one, rather than simply reverting a change that may not be accurate. ] <sup>]</sup> 09:45, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::There has been a arther unfortunate tendency for some ditors to refuse to engage in the debate about this. I am yet to see a proper argument that Northern irish doesn't exist. There has been emphirical evidence produced many times that it does.] (]) 12:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::You are imposing a tag of Northern Irish on people that do not class themselves as such. <strong>]</strong>] 12:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Sable Starr== | |||
| Hello, BigDunc, thanks for relisting my latest srticle on Maud de Braose. My article that you tagged yesterday was deleted as I slept last night by an American editor.(I am on CET).I had found more sources on Sable but it was already deleted. This is not an ego thing, I really believe she desrves her own article. Seeing as Misplaced Pages has a groupies cat, why shouldn't it include one of the most notable groupies of the 1970's along with Bebe Buell and Pamela Des Barres. I grew up in that time and place, I know how famous Sable was, far more so than Connie Hamzy who has her own article. The groupies cat is sparse because we aren't allowed to write articles about the real groupies. What irriates me is how so many editors, especially those in America, have a regional bias-if they have never heard of someone, well they cannot be important, so must be deleted ASAP. As I said, BigDunc, this isn't an ego trip, I don't care who submits the article, I just felt that Sable Starr merited an article and that other editor deleted my article too quickly.Thanks.Sorry for bothering you but I sort of regard you as my mentor here at Misplaced Pages.] (]) 15:30, 6 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :With an article like that you have to be '''very''' careful of violating ]. Have a good read of that, sources have to be strictly adhered to on it. The refs you had were to groupies.com and cant recall the other IMO hardly the most ] wouldn't you agree. Also seems to be a source of the article also not a relaible source. <strong>]</strong>] 15:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Also see it gives you a lot of help in creating articles. <strong>]</strong>] 15:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::I suppose writing about a groupie could be rather dodgy, seeing as she was 15 years old in 1973 and most of the people I mentioned are alive. If I could just get my hands on a proper book about her which could be sourced with dates, names, page numbers, references etc I'd have another go. But until then, I guess my safest bet is to stick with my standard medieval heiresses. They're easier to source and cannot complain about libel!!!Thanks again, BigDunc.Cheers.15:59, 6 June 2008 (UTC)] (]) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Just curious how do we combine the Source section and the ref section because we only need one I believe. ] (]) 16:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692054221 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 02:09, 7 April 2022
|
What happened?I don't believe my eyes, Dunc! What has happened that made you put the retired template up?!!!!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 12:39, 15 February 2010 (UTC) I hope your reasons are not health related. GoodDay (talk) 16:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC) RfC on Community de-adminshipYou are receiving this message because you contributed to Misplaced Pages talk:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC and have not participated at Misplaced Pages:Community de-adminship/RfC or been directly informed this RfC has opened. Please accept my apologies if you have been informed of and/or participated in the RfC already. This RfC has opened and your comments are welcome and encouraged. Please visit Misplaced Pages:Community de-adminship/RfC. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC) Wikimedia IrelandHi, A while back you added your name at Wikimedia Ireland. Well, it took a year (almost to the day) but ten editors have expressed an interest in starting a Wikimedia chapter in Ireland, which meets the criteria for a "critical mass". If you're still interested, I'd would be great if we could kick off discussion. Maybe, a first step might be to introduce ourselves (anonymously) at the chapter talk page with some ideas about what a chapter could do or a sketch of your interest in founding one ... or even just say restate an interest and say 'hello' :-) You may also be interested in joining the Wikimedia Ireland mailing list, if you are not already on it. --RA (talk) 20:08, 20 July 2010 (UTC) You are missedBig Dunc, I wish you'd reconsider and come back into the Wikpedia fold. You are sorely missed here.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 10:27, 23 January 2011 (UTC) Nomination of Errol Fuller for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Errol Fuller is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Errol Fuller until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bender235 (talk) 15:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC) ArbCom elections are now open!Hi, |